HomeMy WebLinkAbout6349 Rookery Rd - Special Inspections/Engineering - 07/07/2006Reinforcing Steel Quality Assurance Observation SECURE
Per the client's request, a representative of SECURE has visually CONSULTING ENGINEERS
observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at
the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations 1i'':' A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY
and opinions at the time of our visit.
Client: 1Sra..v .a �1.sE4 >u_< � r� Site Address: g3y9
Secure Job Lot: i2 Block: 'io Filing:
Date: Contact: =g-el .: ., Subdivision:
Reinforcing Plan Information
Plan By:
Date: o4/2-gA6 Job#: ie3A/
Reinforcing Type(s):
❑ footing
❑ grade beam
❑ structural slab
❑ column
�i( foundation wall
❑ pier cap
❑ slab -on -grade
❑ other
Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Horz.
Vert./Ties
1
G0
21"'/-7T-ffP3db
C/)"vAl
2
Z O
-41 yQ 2'�q,L,
3
de
(_�)rx<l.'iv.
°t6Vs3'0,e,
Pier Cap / Slab Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Longitudinal
Lateral
A
B
C
D
UFER Ground
❑ Installed - Location
4 Not Observed
Max / Min wall height observed: /0 ' / z//
If void forms are required, are they installed as
recommended? /JR-
❑ yes , ❑ no Required thickness: in.
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes b no (% poured = +/-0j)
Weather: -
un,iu-,z �S
Notes:
Summary of Opinions
A It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was in general conformance with the plan.
❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was not in general conformance with the plan.
(2nd observation required).
Deficiencies
Field Representative Date'
By
Tsi
Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 0 Ph`. 970-472-6255 • Fax: 970-472-6256
No Text
Teinforcing Steel Quality Assurance Observation SECURE
Per the client's request, a representative of SECURE has visually CONSULTING ENGINEERS
observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at
the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations %1';' A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY
and opinions at the time of our visit.
Client: Site Address: x9,J
Secure Job Lot: i2 Block: ,zd Filing:
Date:
c�� c,�"vG Contact: Subdivision: Fss•'�' fG �� ��M� L.
s
Reinforcing Plan Information
Plan By: <Xu o e
Date: v6/a-.3 Job#:
Reinforcing Type(s):
❑ footing
❑ grade beam
❑ structural slab
❑ column
,�f foundation wall
❑ pier cap
❑ slab -on -grade
❑ other
Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Horz.
Vert./Ties
1
Gv
21�f/-TP1�P3vo
c//)"y
2
G o
y 1/Q 2 `D• L.
f R/L� sa ''D, G
3
Z
t2)
s" g
4
Z,O
Pier Can / Slab Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Longitudinal
Lateral
A
B
C
D
UFER Ground
❑ Installed - Location
M Not Observed
Max / Min wall height observed: to ' / /
If void forms are re uired, are they installed as
recommended? /
❑ yes , ❑ no Required thickness: in.
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes b no (% poured = +/-p ;)
Weather:
Notes:
Summary of Opinions
74 It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was in general conformance with the plan.
❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was not in general conformance with the plan.
(2nd observation required).
Deficiencies noted:
Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 9 Ph`. 970-472-6255 9 Fax: 970-472-6256
No Text
5_��� tilled Pier Quality Assurance Observation SECURE
�1- CONSULTING ENGINEERS
' Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually observed theMIM
drilling of the piers at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our
observations and opinions at the time of our visit.' A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY
Client: Foundation Plan:
Date: 6 - Z 3 -vG Job:
Secure Job #: ,To / 3 y Soil Report:
Date: C - 29 oG Contact: Job #: Zpoo 5-z— Date: a - S-�
Site Address: 65-�M L. ,,, l? � . j ;r�.< (mil r5
If -
Lot: / Z Block: i o Filing:
Subdivision: a 1 L,l, e., . L,-
Installation Contractor: A..1�
Weather: S - 9� _ s w, ,
Drilled Pier SDecifications
Reinforcing Steel: 34-t5' j '3 at 6,
Pier Diameter /o "
Min. Pier Length: Z 3 C* al - j, C&3 71,
ram,
Min. Penetration
Planned Support Stratum:_
Other: m h o t e I s ��
Description, E=Elevation of top pier, D=Pier Diameter, L=Total Pier Length, P=Penetration, H2O=Depth to Water
Pier
E
D
L
P
H2O
1
3
/'D
,�,
1 3 '
Zo'
2
15/d"
Z3'
/3'
-
3
Yj
0'
Z3
z'
-
4
/o^
Z3'
/31
_
5
t c, ^
2 3
/ 3'
_.
6
2
J
/ON
;,
/ ,
7
/o"-
8_
3
10-
91
n ^
10
T7
/c-
Pier
E
D
L
P
H2O
I
y
/o"
23'
3
12
/v'
3'
1 -3
_
13
a
/o"
2}'
/3'
-
14
/o "
Z3
/ 3'
27-'
15
3
10"
23'
/3'
--
16
/o^
7- -5
17
a #
to "
2 -5,
—
19
20
le2
Subsurface Conditions observed during drilling:
Installation Methods Used
U Pumping ❑ Casing
Q Drill & Pour Tremy
Summary of opinions: N1._r
It is our opinion that the drilled piers observed were in L
general conformance with plans and specifications. y 7.-i
1-4
--9.
❑ It is our opinion that the drilled piers were not in general l i
conformance with plans and specifications.
Corrective
Field Representative: �(,� ��P Q.„ „ Reviewed By:
- , --,
0 Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 0 Ph: 970-4
'Drilled Pier Ouality Assurance Observation SECURE
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually observed the -CONSULTING ENGINEERS
drilling of the piers at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our ow
observations and opinions at the time of our visit. : A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY
Client: i u, . , o-- Foundation Plan:
Date: -z-5 -"G Job: jr-o Ira
Secure Job #•
Date: - Z-1 —oG Contact: Sjg.✓
Site Address: 2oa kA c4 r d .
Lot: /Z Block: / Filing:
Subdivision:��sg: t L4Ic� Qa 1`
Installation Contractor:
Weather: 7S- 90 "
Soil Report:�'c
Job #: Z ao 5Z Date: ! z - 5-- a o
Drilled Pier Specifications
Reinforcing Steel: 3S j 3 G
Pier Diameter ra "
Min. Pier Length: 7-1; l 3Z, 2 G (N �)
Min. Penetration I o '
Planned Support Stratum: mw
Other: �/ < �+, , G /„� y 4-,,
Description, E=Elevation of top pier, D=Pier Diameter, L=Total Pier Length, P=Penetration, H2O=Depth to Water
Pier
E
D
L
P
H2O
2 I
/a "
•2N
1 2
/o'
S 3
/o
Z 4
to
2 5
to '
6
ZgIrz)
_
29t
Io"
�V
1;
t Q'
Z�7
1 -17
Subsurface Conditions observed during drilling:
ra--ZV
Installation Methods Used
Pumping ❑ Casing
qd Drill & Pour (2f Tremy
Summary of opinions:
It is our opinion that the drilled piers observed were in
general conformance with plans and specifications.
❑ It is our opinion that the drilled piers were not in general
conformance with plans and specifications.
Pier
E
D
L
P
H2O
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Corrective Actions: �ti Z i z, B l
p ! L; .I--
D.l'
Field Representative: �L�„ds , Reviewed By:
381
Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 • Ph: 970-4
2
Perimeter Drain / DampproofinE Quality S
�
Assurance Observation C Ul' LOX - U.
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually CONSULTING ENGINEERS
observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced
above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the ' A CTL 1 THOMPSON COMPANY
time of our visit.
Client: 8,a,)n0,) g Cotes/ Nc/: Site Address: 6207 PooEr r pd.d
�d•o��E Ca.�/,�l,a, F•a c.�i.�1. Ce�..��
Secure Job #: Sfo/l3y Lot: /2 Block: /D Filing:
Date: 7-10 -o6 Contact: Subdivision: Fps%/ PAc
Project Specifications
Foundation Plan By: SPcu.
Date �-2'1-06 Job# SFO�/3y
Geotechnical Report By
T„14.'o-,
Date /2-;-Z000 Job# 2000,5236
Recommended Drain type?
ZI Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior
❑ other
Observations
Perimeter drain observed around: - -- -- - - -
;1 Basement - -i ❑ Crawlspace - - --
❑ Other:
Where does the perimeter drain discharge?
❑ Daylight g4 Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain
Dampproofing observed around:
® Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas
Comments D-a•- s oh l :-.s la I!k! c.Je-, e-
;.•ol
y•�clA� ol., i��J .fkck�. Tl,�
LF,�Gi�r G F% i�•8 t�1 •G r4 a.i
r .S --fle �tr �C. p4-�iC)),X GLF I'/brj
Re '-S,)rd,c*, l i re$. 4.,ea,
,
r-
r.
=' ,! v7
J,1 -tii6 F
113E
t
i E
i. * E $nd�Qates apArox mat.c�raln looation
Summary of Opinions w�rc co�.Plrfe
A It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or
dampproofing observed generally conform with the
project referenced above.
❑ .It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or
dampproofing observed differs significantly from the
project specifications (2"d observation required).
Corrective Action:
1.
geld presentatl a ', j IW pate! iDlf
Ar'VL �' % '
Secure Foundations, LLC • 2111 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 • Ph: 970-472-6255 • Fax: 970-472-6256