The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About245 Cajetan St - Special Inspections/Engineering - 02/20/2006Footine Ouality Assurance Observation Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually observed the footing forms under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. SECURE CONSULTING ENGINEERS Client: /4nel Site Address: Secure Job #• � �� c •� _ Sib.S' - 9 h/ Lot: _�/ Block: � Filing: Date: s e Contact: Q.QZ r Subdivision: Foundation Plan Information Plan By: ,, /mac' Date:i v/ IkT Job#: Ftgsizes: , )4-' , 2y'' Pad sizes : -5 (d Concrete on site? ❑ yes, X no, (+/- % ftg poured b /1) Are the footing forms free of loose material, frost, water and or ice, roots, etc? X yes , ❑ no Are the Footing / Pad form sizes in general conformance to the above foundation plan? lgyes, ❑ no Is the footing/pad reinforcing steel in -place or on site per the above foundation plan? Jig yes, ❑ no Weather: wooy — 3Sol Notes: r is rpwA. a_ , Summary of Opinions JA It is our opinion that the footing formwork is in general conformance with the foundation design referenced above. ❑ It is our opinion that the footing formwork differs significantly from the foundation design referenced above (2nd observation required). Corrective action: Reinforcing Steel Quality Assurance Observation SECUIVE, Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually CONSULTING ENGINEERS observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. IF A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY Client: /% r!, ,. ;1.� .,,: Nc Site Address: 2y5d Secure Job #• Lot h Block: +Filing- Date:n _ o6 Contact: i B_� �% ��•-�� Subdivision:T�-- Reinforcine Plan Information Plan By: f1c.Qe Date: i?�o. oS Job#: Reinforcing Type(s): ❑ footing .dfoundation wall ❑ grade beam ❑ pier cap ❑ structural slab ❑ slab -on -grade ❑ column ❑ other Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcine Steel rz. Vert./Ties N 7P *W62 Pier Can / Slab Reinforcine Steel Lateral A B 7C DEGradeLongitudinal UFER Ground ,' Installed - Location ❑ Not Observed Max / Min wall height observed: If void forms are required, are they installed as recommended? .0 ❑ yes , ❑ no Required thickness: in. Concrete on -site? ❑ yes Lino (% poured = +I_ -0Z) Weather:, — Notes: Summary of Opinions It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was in general conformance with the plan. ❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was not in general conformance with the plan. (2"d observation required). Deficiencies Secure Foundations, LLC 0 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 0 Ph: 970-472-6255 0 Fax: 970-472-6256 Perimeter Drain / Dampproofing Quality SECU Assurance Observation Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually CONSULTING ENGINEERS observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY time of our visit. Client: Palladian Homes, Inc. Site Address: 245(aietan fr eP P.0- Rnx 2700S3,Fort Col hin Cn F� Cntl I ins C,0 Secure Job # 34 Lot: �_ Block q Filing: Date: 03laioa Contact: br12 G ardnPr Subdivision: S)Igi Town North Project Specifications Foundation Plan By: 5eure Date 03/22/05 Job# SF05-934 Geotechnical Report By: TerraLCon Date 12/ 19 /170 Job# 20005251 Recommended Drain type? ❑ Exterior perimeter (9/Interior ❑ other Observations Pe 'meter drain observed around: f� Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ Other: Where does the pf rimeter drain discharge? ❑ Daylight I� Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain Dp mpproofing observed around: u Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas Comments -} Garda J t - ..G 1 4- . r2.•. t-j—,..r } '. '_. ttldilates {a( 1m7nit(a[f; draltt locat40R :. a;. i SUmmary of Opinions It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed generally conform with the project referenced above. ❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed differs significantly form the project specifications (2nd observation required). Corrective Action: Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 • Ph: 970-472-6255 • Fax: 970-472-6256 Compaction Test Report CLIENT: PALLADIAN HOMES P.O. BOX 270053 FORT COLLINS CO 80527 as INCORPORATED DATE: (IR/14/nR Phase: 330 REPORTNUMBER: SUBJECT: OLD TOWN NORTH PROJECT NUMBER: F A371 2 non SHEET: I_ OF _ i N. COLLEGE AVE. AND CONIFER ST. FORT COLLINS, CO FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL 245 CAJETAN STRFFT TEST 1 LABORATORY FIELD NO. LOCATION DEPTH TEST T TYPPCF PACOT — SOIL TYPE MAX DENSITY OMC% DRY DENSITY MC% FEET PCF % CURVE NO 7 10' N OF SW CORNER OF GARAGE 0.0 NUC 113.0 16.0 102.0 15.1 90 JOB NO FC03712.000 CURVE NO 1 8 10' N OF SE CORNER OF GARAGE 0.0 NUC 113.0 16.0 104.0 14.4 92 JOB NO FC03712.000 CURVE NO 1 9 � RFi nw NE CORNER OF BASEMENT raeno 0.0 NUC 113.0 16.0 104.0 16.2 92 JOB NO FC03712.000 SPECIFICATIONS: 90 % MAXIMUM ASTM D 698 MOISTURE WITHIN TO % OPTIMUM TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: NOT OBSERVED MOISTURE ADDED BY NOT OBSERVED TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO, OF UNITS: NOT OBSERVED THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES PROGRESS REPORT AS REQUESTED BY DOYLE GARDNER WITH PALLADIAN HOMES, A SITE VISIT WAS MADE ON 6/14/06 TO OBSERVE AND TEST FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL AT 245 CAJETAN STREET. THE BACKFILL WAS PLACED PRIOR TO OUR ARRIVAL. THREE LOCATIONS WERE SELECTED BY US FOR TESTING. WE INFORMED THE CONTRACTOR RESULTS FOR TESTS PERFORMED AT THE LOCATIONS DESCRIBED ABOVE WERE WITHIN SPECIFIED LIMITS. OUR OFFICE WILL BE CONTACTED WHEN ADDITIONAL TESTING IS REQUESTED. a IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S) 7-9 ❑ IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S) SCOPE OF FULL OBSERVATION: ❑ TIME; ❑✓ PERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS; ❑✓ ADVISEDCTOR'S OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE KI, .t 1 /��G mil/. r/�j/�IRLLAD HOfiAE FREDERICK BRAUN �i /_ " G FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CTLITNOMPSON, INC. � (d P APPROVED BY ERIC BERNHA T,,•PE MANAGER OF 4LV'SERVICEB' 4001 Automation Way I Suite 201 1 Fort Collins, CO 80525 1 Phone: 970-206-9455 1 Fax: 970-206-9441