HomeMy WebLinkAbout251 Cajetan St - Special Inspections/Engineering - 02/22/2006Footing Ouality Assurance Observation SECURE
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually CONSULTING ENGINEERS
observed the footing forms under construction at the site referenced
below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the/) C
time of our visit. 11//� A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY
Client: f; ,/^i"•-� 4A�^!s - t. Site Address: 25 e'a'e.7
Secure Job #: <? 3 Lot i5- Block:• Filing:
Date: �.�92/. Contact: Subdivision: e�jIW /oe�n, ;IL
b
Foundation Plan Information
Plan By: uKE
Date: 2 oS e5d _ Job#: Sf OS Jay
Fig sizes: g ,r)2 Z 20 ,, 2y
Pad sizes: `O r36 e4. Jb'r 4/2 4, 0'X31;K
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes , * no, (+/- % fig poured za)
Are the footing forms free of loose material, frost, water and
or ice, roots, etc? jyyes , ❑ no
Are the Footing / Pad form sizes in general conformance to
the above foundation plan? ,4 yes , ❑ no
Is the footing/pad reinfo(cing steel in -place or on site per the
above foundation plan? Jd yes, ❑ no
Weather:�zrl/
Notes
_ �1-�+,F _ nee• n j �;�. t ie /' �o . i.
N
Summary of O inions
It is our opinion that the footing formwork is in
general conformance with the foundation design
referenced above.
❑ It is our opinion that the footing formwork differs
significantly from the foundation design referenced
above (2nd observation required).
Corrective action:
llx�wl ' 021a,111 c
Field Representative r-,rff
p0 LIr`F"-,'tea
o `
38108
Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 • Ph: 970-472-6255 • Fax: 970-472-6256
Reinforcing Steel Quality Assurance Observation SECURE
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually CONSULTING ENGINEERS
observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at
the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations r A CTL I THOMPSON COMPANY
and opinions at the time of our visit.
Client: Site Address: _25/ Ze,er ,1 lrrrv.r
Secure Job #: Lot: S Block: _�/ Filing: —
Date: ' Contact: �..c`�-,:� �<-.crr�.,.,r! Subdivision'
Reinforcing Plan Information
Plan By:
Date: ; z i h Job#: 9-7-1/
Reinforcing Type(s):
❑ footing ZY foundation wall
❑ grade beam ❑ pier cap
❑ structural slab ❑ slab -on -grade
❑ column ❑ other
Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Horz.
Vert./Ties
2
A
":. T(rL'
3
ID
4
Pier Car) / Slab Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Longitudinal
Lateral
A
B
C
D
UFER Ground
.d Installed - Location WjE &4er
❑ Not Observed
Max / Min wall height observed:
If void forms are required, are they installed as
11
recommended? G-
❑ yes , ❑ no Required thickness: in.
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes no (%I poured = +11A
Weather:-r�_,`'c / r.;t �✓�i
Notes:
,%
Summary of Opinions
JX It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was in general conformance with the plan.
❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was not in general conformance with the plan.
(2nd observation required).
Deficiencies noted:
Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 0 Ph: 970-472-6255 0 Fax: 970-472-6256
Perimeter Drain / Dampproofine Ouality
Assurance Observation
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually
observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced
above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the
time of our visit.
SECUIX-E.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
A CTL ► THOMPSON COMPANY
Client: -Pa iIa8ian Harnes,Inc. Site Address: 251 Caietan Street
P-1LRok 27a�Q�� Fot� ��I!�n5 �U Fort C Itlns,CO
Secure Job #: S FOoq�4 Lot: _ Block: —4_ Filing:
Date: 03/29/06 Contact: GardnPr Subdivision: C)1cJTou,n North
Proiect Specifications
Foundation Plan By: SP6t)re
Date I2/05/()'=i Job# SF05-q;4
Geotechnical Report By:Termcon
Date 12/19 /OG Job# 20Qp5251
Recommended Drain type?
❑ Exterior perimeter E(Interior
❑ other
Observations
Pef 'meter drain observed around:
f� Basement ❑ Crawlspace
❑ Other:
Where does the pf rimeter drain discharge?
❑ Daylight 16 Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain
Dgmpproofing observed around:
WBasement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas
Comments
Garage
i_
_
W.P3.,
E
t
AVlb''
��
;
A
.
l
- — _ - — — - Indicates approximate_dialn Location _
Summary of Opinions
It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or
dampproofing observed generally conform with the
project referenced above.
❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or
dampproofing observed differs significantly form the
project specifications (2nd observation required).
Corrective Action:
By
�o L„
38108
Secure Foundations, LLC • 211 West Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO 80521 • Ph: 970-472-6255 0 Fax: 970-472-6256