Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout901 Oakridge Dr - Special Inspections/Engineering - 02/13/19979 p l 00tkV;J3e O VI*Ue' 95aoG+ 13 February 1997 City of Ft. Collins Building Department 281 North College Avenue Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Miramont Sports Center Job No. 2452.0 Ladies or Gentlemen: FEB 181997 RNF Consultants was retained by Vaught Frye Architects as structural consultants for the contract document and construction administration phases of the Miramont Sports Center project, recently constructed at the site by Baldwin Construction Company. Structural drawings have been prepared under my direction and permits were obtained using documents bearing the seal and signature of Ronald N. Frickel, P.E.. Foundation systems were designed in accordance with the recommndations contained in the Soil Report by Water, Waste & Land, Inc., dated Sept. 27, 1993. Verification of soil bearing material for foundation support was made by the consulting soils engineer. According to our contract for services and as is standard in the structural engineering profession, RNF Consultants has reviewed shop drawings and samples submitted by the contractor for general conformance to the design concept of the project. During the course of construction, RNF Consultants personnel made periodic site observa- tions, when contacted by the contractor, to observe the construction progress and quality of the work and to determine whether the items observed were in general conformance with the design intent of the construction documents. Items requiring correction have been brought to the attention of the contractor for implementation. On the basis of our on -site observations as an engineer, we have endeavored to guard the owner against apparent defects and deficiences in permanent work constructed by the contractor, but we do not guarantee the performance of the contractor, nor are we responsible for any possible failure of the contractor to execute the work in accordance with the construction contract. Our findings were reported in the form of inspection memos addressed to the Architect for distribution and are attached for your information. Dates of these inspections-were-2 August 1995, 11 August 1995, 11 September 1995, 5 October 1995, 11 October 1995 and 1 December 1995. RI �F CONSULTANTS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS • 11290 W. ALAMEDA • LAKEWOOD COLO. 80226.303.986 1546 2 August 1995 SITE OBSERVATION MEt70 TO: Gary Dennison Vaught Frye Architects FROM: Ron Frickel RNF Consultants Re: Miramont Tennis/Fitness Center Job No. 2452.3 The project site was visited with the following observations: 1. Concrete foundation and grade wall construction was proceeding. In general, the east side of the tennis area has been completed, including grade wall, pilasters and building frame anchor bolts. A portion of the south wall has been completed, primarily footings are poured but no grade wall. Footings have been poured around most of the fitness center area. Some remaining work was left at the north end of this area. 2. Pad footings had been installed in the area between the two buildings. No grade wall construction had yet started there. 3. Workmen were in the process of forming and locating reinforcing on the north end of the tennis area towards the west end. All reinforcing observed appeared to have adequate cover, was properly positioned, and in general securely tied to form ties at these locations. 4, At the southeast tens iv -court corner, the top and bottom grade wall bars, which had projected from the end of the pour located a few feet west of the corner, had been cut off with a projection of 8" to 10". This is not adequate to provide development through a splice. It will be necessary to drill and epoxy addi- tional reinforcement. The two top bars can be replaced with 2 - #5 bars located approximately 2" below the existing projecting bars. These should be drilled a minimum of 2' into the concrete and should project a minimum of 2' beyond. One bottom bar was not cut, this can remain as long as straightened. The bottom bar which was cut should be replaced with a #6 bar embedded 2'-3" and projecting 2'-3" located no more than 2" higher than the original bar. It is important to thoroughly clean the drilled holes before installing the epoxy for this to be acceptable. In general, the other items observed appeared to be competently completed and in general conformance to the design intent of the construction documents. -onald n. frickel • structural engineer • 11290 w. alameda • lakewood Colo. 80226 •303 •9861546 Y 021111%97 12:27 -&970 484 0454 1�RRACON FIC Dare October 4, 1995 Baldwin Construction 301 East Lincoln Fort Collins, Colorado 80624 Attention. Mr. Albert Hamill Ra: Miramont Sports Center JOG Nc, 20951075 Gentlemen: we are iransmotlnq ® nerewith C under sapaoate cover --copies of the = Field Data !'C laboratory Data C; Report Pegaroinq' Compacted Fills -Boring Logs I-oot,ngs - Location Ulagram — Drilled Piers Sal Samples F,les Rock Gore Sampie5 _ Concrete Construction Material _ Aspnalt Samples Roofing Moisturo-Donsity _ Aggregate Consolidation = Non-destructive Testing Z Triex!s! Compression of Steel C Permeability _ Non-destructive Tasting C Field Boring Logs of Concrete to structural Steel Grain Size Analysis 4J u 4: Irerracon oONSULTANTS WESTERN. INC. CM71649 "CRATORIES DIVISION P.O. Ogg .503• 701 N. Howes Port Comma. Colarndo 00822 (279) 484k259 Fax (970) 494-0454 Geologic Report of 0 Seismic Survey ❑ Resistivity Survey 7, Site Rock Conditions ❑ Aggregate Development Ceneral information ❑ TBChnlcal Exporli6A ❑ Hesumes U Otner U Report will follow under separate cover On -site observation services were provided ❑ Full time F1 Part tirnd We have not been asked to Interpret the data or to make design and/or construction wcornmendaiions based pn Toe Clara, and cannot assume respons!billty or llabllity for Interpretation of this date by olners Rama*s: Your, truly, TER'R/A�CO�N CONSULTANTS WESTERN, INC. Mike t. Walker, CET Manager of Construction Services in:bn iR-aT-aa-t --- -- ------------------------- 02/11'27 12;27 IT970 184 0454 TERRACON FTC Date: 9126/95 Page 1 of 1 234 Aspen Circle Golden, Colorado 80403 inepex J/N: 9567 Bus; 941.9272 Client J/N: 20951076 Project Name; Miramont Tennis do Fitness Center, Vt. Collins, CO (Ment's Name: umpire Laboratories Contractor: Baldwin Construction Description of Work. VT of structural steel repairs. Persons Notified of Results: M. Walker/Empire; D, Rodarmel/Baldwin Obgervations: Per the request of D. Rodarmel of Udwin Construction, visual inspection of structural steel repairs was performed with results as noted in the following locations: Column to base plate connections. line A @ M2- M7 and line G 0 M2: Column base plates torch cut to accept oversize anchor bolts; %" x 1034" x 4" plates with drilled holes to fit anchor bolts placed, functioning as plats washers; added plates welded in Place with a minimum 3/160 fillet weld at three sides to column base plate and flanges. Missing roof girder to colutrin connection bolts acceptably placed at grid G-M6- All roof girder to column bolted connections acceptably tensioned to bring faring surfaces into contact. (Note: The above conditions originally reported 9112195)- One column to anchor bolt connection nut was noted as loose at grid G-M4. HLO=bO L6-Zi-qaA U.1t-97 12:28 'a`97U 484 0154 - TERP-WON FTC - Empire Laboratories, Inc. Date: September 26, 1995 A Division of The Torraeon Companies, Ine. PC, Sox S07 • 301 No. Howes Baldwin Construction f on cofims. C0101200 e052a 301 East Lincoln 84-0359 FAXN For[ Collins, Colorado 80524 <xa(3c3).ea-osss X'e2-1� Attention: for, Albert HamillRe. Miramont Sports Center - Job No 20951076 Gentlemen: wg are transmitting ® herewith In under separate cover copies of the C Field Cata M Laboratory Data ❑ Report Rcge.,ding. Compacted Ells Footings Drilled PiGr5 ❑ Piles - Concrete Asphalt Rooting Aggregate Non-destruclive Testing of Steel - Nan -destructive TVsling of Concrete Crain Size Analysis C Boring Logs O Location Dlaoram C Sell samples O ROCk Core Samples n construction Material Samples 0 Moisture -Density LJ Consolidation ❑ Triaxial Compression 171 Permeability n Field Boring Logs 3 Structural Steel n Geologic Report of ❑ Seismic Survey G Resistivity Survey LJ Site Rock Conditions Fl Aggregate Development r-1 General Intormation 0 Technical Expertise U Aesumcs U Other F7 Report will fellow under separate cover On -Site observation services were provided 0 Full time ❑ Part time 1N,; have not peen asked to intcrprot the data or to make de3ign ancior constroctiotr racorrtrrlendaiions based on Ine data. and cannot assume responsibility or liability for interpretation of this data by others. Remarks: — Yours truly, EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 14i ke 1. Walker, CET manager of Construction Services HLO=bO L6-Zi—qad .,,11%97 19:28 $970 484 0454 TERRACQN FTC 234 Aspen Card• Date: 9 12/9S Page 1 of 1 Golden, C010tadO 80403 8us:941-9272 Tnspex J/N: 9567 Client J/N: 20951076 Project Name: Miramont Tennis & Fitness Center, Ft, Collins Client's Norm: Empire Laboratories Contractor: RaM win Coustiucticn Description of Work: VT of structural steel erection. Persons Notified of Results: M. Walker/Empire; D. Rodarmel/Saldwin Observations: Per the request of M. Walker of Empire Laboratories, visual inspection of the erection of structural steel in the tennis court structure was perforoied with results as noted in the following locations: Roof girder to column bolted connections along lines A and 0 not sufficiently tensioned to hring member faying surfaces into contact; bolt placement noted as incomplete at two locations along lint G. Window frame and girt to roof rafter welding acceptably complete at all locations at the north and south building walls. Column to anchor bolt connection modifications neccessitated by mismatched bolt and bast plate hole sizes have yet to be accomplished. 10005 i 1by ANI11 4C�1 p tam 121 °70 WM M; 13 February 1997 Miramont Sports Center Page 2 'special Inspection"- of high Tension Molting was performed by Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. on September 12, 1995 and September 26, 19950, report copies attached. These reports indicate substantial compliance with project specifications for High Strength Bolting. "Special Inspection" for welding was not provided by RNF Consultants as we had no prior knowledge of this requirement. However, our periodic site observations noted general compliance for deck welding and miscellaneous bracing welds. It should be noted that all field welds for this project were designed for less than 50% of the allowable weld stresses, and as such, are minimally loaded and should be excluded from the "Special Inspections" requirement of UBC Sections 305 and 306. We believe the welds observed generally conform to the design intent of the construction documents. For those portions of the building(s) observed, based on the completion of the recommendations above noted, we believe the building constructed to be in general conformance to the design intent of the construction documents. On the basis of our onsite observations as the engineer and to the best of our knowledge, we believe that the structural systems have been constructed in general conformance with the requirements of the construction documents. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, aaaagaa.•n,�q N TANTS Fe kk E O 10 Ro d N. Frickel, P.E1,-49:.-0)4(-A7 RNF/co �'4PONAL I December 1995 + SITE OBSERVATION MEMO TO: Gary Dennison Vaught Frye Architects FROM: Ron Frickel RNF Consultants Re: Miramont Tennis & Fitness Center Job No. 2452.3 The project site was visited today with the following observatons: 1. Finish work is proceeding. Ceilings have not yet been installed, however, drywall partitions have been erected and painted. 2. The metal screen framing around the mechanical equipment has been installed. The bracing angles are placed at the underside of the top chord joist angle and across the bottom of the bottom chord of the trusses. Pipe extending through the roof is welded adja- cent to the joists as detailed. 3. There does not appear to be any angle braces from the ends of the joists down to the bottom flanges of the beams at or near column locations. Refer to the structural drawings. This condition is typical throughout the project. The angle braces which were not installed need to be completed ASAP so as not to delay ceiling construction. 4. At the ends of the mechanical frame or screen, the installation has top and bottom angles between joists and X-bracing between, as indicated on the drawings. 5. At a point just west of the north entry, between the third and fourth joist west of the beam which is on the west side of the entry area, the deck splice is located midway between joists. There is no attachment at this point, and I could not tell if the lap goes all the way to the joist on the west. 6. Top of studs appear to have all been unscrewed so that they are no longer attached to the top track. Where drywall does not extend all the way to the top of the wall, the superintendent was advised to provide a continuous track member just below the top in order to brace the studs. W CONSULTANTS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS • 11290 W. ALAMEDA • LAKEWOOD COLO. 80226.303.986 1546 11 October 1995 SITE OBSERVATION MEMO To: Gary Dennison Vaught -Frye Architects From: Mark A. Miller RNF Consultants Re: Miramont Fitness & Tennis Center Job No. 2452.0 The referenced project site was visited today and the following items were noted: 1. Roof deck welding at the highest roof, and north of grid line 2 was substantially complete. It appeared to be in compliance with the drawings where it was finished. Joists were being installed over the massage -spa - equipment rooms. ' 2. Diagonal bracing was not installed on the four sides of the high roof framing. This was discussed with the superintendent, and should be as noted on plan on sheet S3, as shown on detail M/3-5, and per shop drawing detail P on sheet E3. 3. The roof deck splice which was discussed with Front Range Steel had been located between grids 0 and 1 just east of M. It appeared to be properly done. 4. At the junction of the main building and the tennis building, the cap flashing on the masonry to the north was observed. The horizontal surface did not appear to slope away from the wall as required by your details 3/A-503 and 4/A-503. With the exceptions noted, the work appeared to be in general compliance with the construction documents. If you have any questions, please call. W CONSULTANTS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS • 11290 W. ALAMEDA • LAKEWOOD COLO. 80226.303.986 1546 5 October 1995 SITE OBSERVATION MEMO Zn: Gary Dennison Vaught Frye Architects FROPI: Ron Frickel RNF Consultants Re: Miramont Tennis & Fitness Center Job No. 2452.3 The project site was visited at the request of the contractor for the purpose of observing the construction progress and quality of construction. The following items were noted: 1. The wedge anchors used to attach the edge angle to the masonry wall are "Dual -bolt" wedge anchors made by Dual Fastening, Inc.. 2. The south end of the joists, which bear on the exterior masonry wall, have bearing plates which are accurately set. Welds to the plate are appropriate. Edge angle is welded to the joists as required. Joist spacing varies in accordance with the framing plans. 3. The LH joists are braced with 3 rows of bridging, center row is "X", the outside two are straight top and bottom. This is satisfactory. 4. The lintel over the open area into the mechanical room has approximately 1-1/2" of bearing at the south end. It is attached to a tube column at the north end. We believe this bearing should be extended. We recommend extending the beam web by adding a 1/4" plate to the end of the web, extending at least 6" onto the masonry bearing plate. 5. The interior metal wall studs have been placed so the top is tight up to the underside of beams and joists. Some slip joint allowance should be made for beam/joist deflection under snow loads. The studs have a slip joint under some of the joists but not under the beams. W CONSULTANTS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS • 11290 W. ALAMEDA • LAKEWOOD COLO. 80226.303.986 1546 5 October 1995 Miramont Tennis & Fitness Center Page 2 6. Deck welding was observed and, in general, looked to be of relatively good quality. Near the southeast corner, there were several ribs that were missed at the third row from the east end. Further to the north on that same row, the weld did not hit the joists below and there are 3 or 4 connections that should be re -welded. 7. Edges were welded at 6" on center as specified. S. End of -deck is not yet welded where the roof steps up along the west side of the raised area. In general, the work observed appeared to be in conformance with the design intent of the construction documents. Please call if you have any questions. 11 September 1995 SITE OBSERVATION MEMO TO: Gary Dennison Vaught Frye Architects FROM: Ron Frickel RNF Consultants Re: Miramont Tennis & Fitness Center Job No. 2452.3 The site was visited this day with the following observations: 1. The rigid frame steel building frames have been erected and roof purlins are being_ installed at this time. 2. Some of the large anchor bolts at the bottom of the frame re- quired enlarging of the holes to get the frame to fit over them. We recommend a plate of equal thickness to the existing plate be welded over the top with beveled edge cuts at the existing flange/web to plate intersections to fit over the existing welds. The edge of this plate should be welded all around to the column web and flanges. Anchor bolt locations should be carefully located so that holes through the new plates can be accurately punched. 3. X-braces in the walls have not yet been completely installed but are in place ready for tensioning. 4. Some of the frame splice connections, particularly at the top of the knee where the rafter beam frames into the top of column, do not appear to be tightly fit. There is a gap noted between the plates. These bolts and plate connections need to be tested for compliance with AISC specifications. 5. Anchor bolts along the north end wall were also observed to have been mislocated and new expansion anchors installed at these locations. It appears that a 3 x 3 x 1/4" plate washer welded around the top of the enlarged hole before the nut is tightened would satisfactorily repair this condition. 6. Asphalt paving has been laid in the,tennis center building. W CONSULTANTS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS • 11290 W. ALAMEDA • LAKEWOOD COLO. 80226.303.986 1546 11 September 1995 Miramont Tennis & Fitness Center Page 2 7. Masonry work was proceeding around the southwestern portion of the fitness center. Grout was being installed and reinforcement was being placed near gridlines 5.2 and U. Procedures observed being used were appropriate for the condition. 8. Slab -on -grade has been poured in a portion of the fitness center. Fine grading was underway in other areas. The work observed appeared to be in general conformance with the design intent of the construction documents. I discussed the need to test the high strength bolts at the moment connections on the rigid frames to comply with the ACI specifications for moment connected bolt conditions. 11 August 1995 SITE OBSERVATION MEMO TO: Gary Dennison Vaught Frye Architects FROM: Ron Frickel RNF Consultants Re: Miramont Tennis & Fitness Center Job No. 2452.3 The site was visited this day to observe progress. The following items were noted: 1. A portion of the west wall of the tennis area grade wall was being readied for pouring later today. Forms were set from approximately the intersection with the south wall of the fitness center northward 4 column bays. This will complete the grade wall pour on this wall line. 2. The top bars being placed were resting on top of the top row of form ties. This resulting in_ a concrete cover- at the top- of approximately 1-3/8". I advised the Superintendent to lower the top row to the bottom of the ties and hang them to provide a 2" top cover. 3. The tension tie bars extending across the building at each metal building column frame line were located in trenches and supported on concrete brick turned on edge. This provides the necessary cover at the location of the brick; however, at some locations between supports, the bottom of the trench was not level and in some cases reduced the cover to approximately 2". The Superintendent was advised to lower these high spots to provide a minimum 3" cover in all locations. No other discrepancies to the design intent of the construction documents were noted. ronald n. frickel • structural engineer • 11290 w. alameda • lakewood colo. 80226 •303 •986154t