Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018CV2867 - FORT COLLINS MENNONITE FELLOWSHIP AND STEVE RAMER V. CITY OF FORT COLLINS, ET AL - 051 - STIPULATION OF HOLLIE JOHNSON TO BE BOUND BY JUDGMENT1745554.1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-02867-NYW FORT COLLINS MENNONITE FELLOWSHIP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, and STEVE RAMER, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, a home rule municipality, THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL, and LAURIE DAVIS, ROBERT DAVIS, MARY RAY, H. STUART MACMILLAN, HOLLY JOHNSON, LAURA PETRICK, DAVE PETRICK, KATHERINE ACOTT, WALTER HICKMAN, PATRICIA DIEHL, LISA EATON, FERAH AZIZ, TARA MCCORMAC, JENNIFER PETRIK, PAMELA REFREM, NICK MATTHEWS, DENNIS BOOKSTABER, BELL GOULD LINDER & SCOTT, P.C. TOM HALL, and STEVE ACKERMAN, in their individual capacities. Defendants. DEFENDANT HOLLIE JOHNSON’S STIPULATION TO BE BOUND BY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM UNDER COLO. R. CIV. P. RULE 106(A)(4) Plaintiffs Fort Collins Mennonite Fellowship, a Colorado nonprofit corporation (the “Fellowship”), and Steve Ramer (“Ramer” and collectively with the Fellowship, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendant Hollie Johnson (“Defendant”), hereby Case 1:18-cv-02867-NYW Document 51 Filed 02/07/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 1745554.1 2 submit this Defendants’ Stipulation to be Bound by this Court’s Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claim Under C.R.C.P. Rule 106(a)(4) (this “Stipulation”), as follows: 1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint and Request for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief in this case on November 6, 2018 (the “Complaint”). The Complaint seeks, among other things, certiorari review pursuant to Colo. R. Civ. P. Rule 106(a)(4) (“Rule 106(a)(4)”). 2. Defendant is an individual who resides at or owns real property located in the vicinity of the Fellowship’s property at issue in this case. Due to a typographical error, Defendant’s name is incorrectly spelled as “Holly” in the case caption. 3. Following the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board’s (the “PZB”) approval of the Fellowship’s Minor Amendment Application at issue in this case, Defendant joined in an Appeal of that approval (the “Appeal”) to the Fort Collins City Council (“City Council”). 4. City Council conducted a public hearing considering the Appeal on October 9, 2018. Defendant appeared in person at the October 9, 2018 City Council hearing in support of the Appeal, and was deemed to be a “party-in-interest” for the Appeal. 5. An applicant for a land use decision, the issuance of which is challenged under Rule 106(a)(4), is an indispensable party to such an action. See Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Carter, 564 P.2d 421, 422 (Colo. 1977). 6. Because Defendant joined in the Appeal, appeared before City Council on October 9, 2018, and was deemed to be a “party-in-interest” by City Council, the Fellowship joined Defendant as an indispensable party in its Second Claim for Relief under Rule 106(a)(4). 7. Defendant is not a party to any other claims in this action. Case 1:18-cv-02867-NYW Document 51 Filed 02/07/19 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5 1745554.1 3 8. Defendant understands that the City of Fort Collins and City Council are defending against Plaintiffs’ 106(a)(4) claim, and Defendant does not wish to actively participate in this action. Defendant agrees to be bound by any decision made by this Court related to that claim. 9. Plaintiffs acknowledge and agree that their Second Claim for Relief under Rule 106(a)(4) does not entitle plaintiff to seek any monetary damages against Defendant, including pecuniary damages or attorneys’ fees. 10. Plaintiffs acknowledge and agree that this Stipulation, and any similar stipulation entered into by other defendants, does not affect or hinder any party’s ability to appear and speak at any public hearing before City Council. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants respectfully request that this Court enter an Order making this Stipulation an Order of the Court. Respectfully submitted this 7th day of February, 2019. /s/David A. Brewster Thomas Macdonald Brian J. Connolly David A. Brewster Andrew L.W. Peters Otten, Johnson, Robinson, Neff & Ragonetti, P.C. 950 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1600 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: 303 825 8400 Facsimile: 303 825 6525 E-mail: mac@ottenjohnson.com E-mail: bconnolly@ottenjohnson.com E-mail: dbrewster@ottenjohnson.com E-mail: apeters@ottenjohnson.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs FORT COLLINS MENNONITE FELLOWSHIP and STEVE RAMER Case 1:18-cv-02867-NYW Document 51 Filed 02/07/19 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5 Case 1:18-cv-02867-NYW Document 51 Filed 02/07/19 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5 1745554.1 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 7th day of February, 2019, a true and correct copy of the foregoing DEFENDANT HOLLIE JOHNSON’S STIPULATION TO BE BOUND BY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM UNDER COLO. R. CIV. P. RULE 106(A)(4) was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following email addresses: Andrew D. Ringel Hall & Evans, L.L.C. 1001 Seventeenth Street, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80202 ringela@hallevans.com Attorney for Defendants The City of Fort Collins and The City of Fort Collins City Council /s/ Margo Brown Margo Brown Case 1:18-cv-02867-NYW Document 51 Filed 02/07/19 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5