HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-cv-901 - Surat v. City of Fort Collins, et al. - 112 - ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION10/06/2020 112 ORDER denying Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to
Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
[Doc. #108] 111 . Plaintiff's Motion is once again DENIED without
prejudice to refiling given Plaintiff's counsel's continuing inability to
comply with WJM Revised Practice Standard II.D.2. This Practice
Standard requires that the certificate of service for motions of this type
specifically confirm that service has been made upon moving counsel's
client(s) and, if appropriate, identifies the individual who has received
service of the motion on behalf of any party which is not a natural
person. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/6/2020.
Text Only Entry(wjmsec, ) (Entered: 10/06/2020)