Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023CV30276 - Higgins v. City of Fort Collins, et al. - 040 - C&L Water Solutions Answer To Sunbelt's Counter-Claim 29200100.1:11772-0041 DISTRICT COURT, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 201 La Porte Ave, Suite 100 Ft. Collins, CO 80521 Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN HIGGINS, v. Defendants: CITY OF FORT COLLINS; C&L WATER SOLUTIONS, INC.; SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.; KODIAK FIELD SERVICES, LLC; AND BCH SERVICES, LLC Cross-Claim Plaintiffs: C & L WATER SOLUTIONS, INC; SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. Cross-Claim Defendants: SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.; C & L WATER SOLUTIONS, INC; Attorneys for C&L Water Solutions, Inc. Jason H. Klein, Reg. No. 53303 Tamara C. Jordan, Reg. No. 52061 Susan E. Malcolm, Reg. No. 52612 Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP 1805 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200 Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129 Phone: 720-479-2500 Fax: 303-471-1855 E-mail: jklein@wshblaw.com tjordan@wshblaw.com smalcolm@wshblaw.com ▲ COURT USE ONLY ▲ Case No. 2023CV30276 Division: 4C CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANT C&L WATER SOLUTIONS, INC.'S ANSWER TO CROSS-CLAIM PLAINTIFF SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.'S COUNTER-CLAIM DATE FILED: August 18, 2023 10:38 AM FILING ID: C1B6F9B748A93 CASE NUMBER: 2023CV30276 29200100.1:11772-0041 2 Cross-Claim Defendant C&L Water Solutions, Inc. ("C&L"), by and through its attorneys, Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP, and as for its Answer to Cross-Claim Plaintiff Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.'s Counter-Claim states as follows: IV. PARTIES 1. Without knowledge and therefore, denied. 2. Admitted. V. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. C&L does not dispute venue at this time, however, reserves the right to so dispute should information be obtained during discovery indicating that venue is improper. 4. C&L does not dispute jurisdiction at this time, however, reserves the right to so dispute should information be obtained during discovery indicating that jurisdiction is improper. VI. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 5. Admitted. 6. Admitted that C&L worked with the City pursuant to the Services Agreement dated October 30, 2019. To the extent the allegations herein are an incorrect recitation of that agreement, C&L denies the allegations. 7. Admitted that C&L worked with the City pursuant to the Services Agreement dated October 30, 2019. To the extent the allegations herein are an incorrect recitation of that agreement, C&L denies the allegations. 8. Admitted that C&L worked with the City pursuant to the Services Agreement dated October 30, 2019. To the extent the allegations herein are an incorrect recitation of that agreement, C&L denies the allegations. 9. Admitted. 10. Denied. 11. Denied. 12. Without knowledge and therefore, denied. 13. Without knowledge and therefore, denied. 14. Without knowledge and therefore, denied. 29200100.1:11772-0041 3 15. Without knowledge and therefore, denied. 16. Denied. 17. Denied. 18. Denied. 19. Without knowledge, therefore denied. 20. Denied. VII. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Breach of Contract) 21. C&L hereby incorporates its responses to the above paragraphs of Counter-Claim as if fully restated herein. 22. The allegations in this paragraph are not directed to C&L. To the extent the allegations are deemed to be directed to C&L, C&L denies same. 23. Admitted. 24. Denied. 25. Denied. 26. Denied. 27. Denied. 28, Denied. 29. Denied. 30. Denied. VIII. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Negligence) 31. C&L hereby incorporates its responses to the above paragraphs of Counter-Claim as if fully restated herein. 32. Denied. 33. Denied. 29200100.1:11772-0041 4 34. Denied. 35. Denied. 36. Denied. IX. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Contribution Pursuant to C.R.C. § 13-50.1-101 et seq.) 37. C&L hereby incorporates its responses to the above paragraphs of Counter-Claim as if fully restated herein. 38. Without knowledge, therefore denied. 39. Denied. 40. Denied. WHEREFORE CLAUSE - PRAYER FOR RELIEF C&L denies all allegations contained in the Counter-Claim's "Wherefore" or “Prayer for Relief” clause. GENERAL DENIAL C&L denies all allegations contained in Cross-Claim Plaintiff's Counter-Claim not expressly admitted herein. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 1. Cross-Claim Plaintiff’s claims are barred by a failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2. Cross-Claim Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of comparative negligence pursuant to C.R.S. § 13-21-111. 3. Cross-Claims Plaintiff's alleged damages, if any, and C&L's liability, if any, must be determined in accordance with sections 13-21-102.5 (limitations on damages for non-economic loss or injury), 13-21-111 (comparative negligence as a measure of damages), 13-21-111.5 (pro- rata liability of defendants), 13-21-111.6 (collateral sources), and 13-21-111.7 (assumption of risk) of the Colorado Revised Statutes. 4. Cross-Claim Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of contributory negligence. 29200100.1:11772-0041 5 5. Cross-Claim Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of waiver. 6. Cross-Claim Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of estoppel. 7. Cross-Claim Plaintiff’s claims are barred entirely by the fact its own negligence in unilaterally placing the hose across the subject road – against the express direction of C&L and without any authority or permission from any entity, including C&L – directly caused any and all of the alleged damages Plaintiff is seeking in this matter. RESERVATION OF DEFENSES C&L reserves the right to assert and amend defenses as discovery and investigation in this matter is accomplished, including by amending the Answer to add, delete, and/or modify affirmative defenses. C&L does not waive any applicable defenses. JURY DEMAND C&L demands a jury trial on all issues so triable. Respectfully submitted this 18th day of August, 2023. WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP /s/ Susan E. Malcolm Jason H. Klein Tamara C. Jordan Susan E. Malcolm 29200100.1:11772-0041 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 18th day of August, 2023, a true and correct copy of the CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANT C&L WATER SOLUTIONS, INC.'S ANSWER TO CROSS-CLAIM PLAINTIFF SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.'S COUNTER-CLAIM was e- filed and/or e-served via Colorado Courts E-Filing System on the following parties: Karl Hager VanMeveren Law Group, PC 123 N. College Ave., #112 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Attorneys for Plaintiff Arthur J. Kutzer SGR, LLC 3900 E. Mexico Ave., #700 Denver, CO 80210 Attorneys for Defendant BCH Services, LLC Scott A. Neckers Sean T. Conrecode Overturf McGrath & Hull PC 625 E. 16th Ave., #100 Denver, CO 80203 Attorneys for Defendant Kodiak Field Services LLC Jamey W. Jamison Randee L. Stapp Dino G. Moncecchi Harris, Karstaedt, Jamison & Powers, P.C. 10333 E Dry Creek Rd., #300 Englewood, CO 80112 Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Claim Plaintiff Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. Andrew W. Callahan Cassie L. Williams WICK & TRAUTWEIN, LLC 323 South College Ave., #3 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Attorneys for City of Fort Collins /s/ Joreen Hensley Joreen Hensley