Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018CV3112 - Sean Slatton V. Fort Collins Police Department, Todd Hopkins, Brandon Barnes And John Hutto - 141 - Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To File Response1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-03112-RBJ-STV SEAN SLATTON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FORT COLLINS, a municipality, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 137] ______________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff, Sean Slatton, by and through undersigned counsel, submits the following Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File his Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 on Behalf of the City of Fort Collins [Doc. 137] and requests an additional fourteen (14) days to submit his Response. In support thereof, Plaintiff states: CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1, counsel for Plaintiff certifies that they conferred via email with Mark Ratner, Counsel for Defendant, who indicated that his client does not object to the relief requested herein. 1. On October 4, 2021, the City of Fort Collins filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 137]. 2. The current deadline for Plaintiff to respond is October 25, 2021. 3. Counsel for Plaintiff is diligently working to complete the Response; however, an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including November 8, 2021, is needed to finalize. Case 1:18-cv-03112-RBJ-STV Document 141 Filed 10/18/21 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3 2 4. Tyrone Glover, who is the attorney primarily responsible for drafting the Response, in addition to the usual press of business: was preparing for trial in Manoukian v. Ouelette 20CV30007 in Boulder District Court which recently settled but was scheduled for October 11th- 15th, 2021 and is working on responses to three separate motions for summary judgment in Andersen v. Colorado Springs et. al. 20CV02032-RBJ, which were served on October 12, 2021. 5. David A. Lane, counsel for Plaintiff, is currently in trial October 18th-22nd on Castille v. Gann Jr. 17cv00912-RM-SKC, which has required considerable time and preparation. 6. No party will be prejudiced by the relief requested herein. WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant this motion for extension of time to file his Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including November 8, 2021. Respectfully submitted this 18th day of October 2021. s/Tyrone Glover David A. Lane Tyrone Glover KILLMER, LANE & NEWMAN, LLP 1543 Champa Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 571-1000 (303) 571-1001 facsimile dlane@kln-law.com tglover@kln-law.com Case 1:18-cv-03112-RBJ-STV Document 141 Filed 10/18/21 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 18, 2021, I filed the foregoing via the CM/ECF system, which will send notice to the following: Mark Ratner Hall & Evans, LLC 1001 17th Street, Ste 300 Denver, CO 80202 303-628-3300 ratnerm@hallevans.com Counsel for Defendant the City of Fort Collins Sean Slatton Via email s/ Tyrone Glover Attorney KILLMER, LANE & NEWMAN, LLP Case 1:18-cv-03112-RBJ-STV Document 141 Filed 10/18/21 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3