HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021CV30425 - Save The Poudre And No Pipe Dream Coporation V. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, Northern Integrated Supply Project Water Activity Enterprise, The City Of Fort Collins - 029 - Response To Motion To Compile Administrative RecordLarimer County District Court
201 La Porte Ave, Suite 100
Fort Collins, CO 80521
COURT USE ONLY
SAVE THE POUDRE, and
NO PIPE DREAM CORPORATION
Plaintiffs
v.
NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY
DISTRICT,
NORTHERN INTERGRATED SUPPLY PROJECT
WATER ACTIVITY ENTERPRISE, and
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, a Colorado home rule city
and municipal corporation,
Defendants.
Attorneys for Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District and Northern Integrated Supply Project Water
Activity Enterprise:
Bennett W. Raley, #13429
Peggy E. Montaño, #11075
William Davis Wert, #48722
Mirko L. Kruse, #52488
TROUT RALEY
1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1600
Denver, CO 80203
Telephone: (303) 861-1963
FAX Number: (303) 832-4465
email: braley@troutlaw.com, pmontano@troutlaw.com,
dwert@troutlaw.com, mkruse@troutlaw.com
Case No. 21CV30425
DEFENDANT NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT’S
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ RE-FILED MOTION TO PREPARE AND CERTIFY
THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
Defendant, the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“Northern Water”), by and
through its undersigned attorneys, hereby responds to Plaintiffs’ Re-Filed Motion to Prepare and
Certify the Administrative Record.
Plaintiffs move this Court for an Order directing Northern Water to prepare and certify the
administrative record “pertaining to its actions of August 12, 2021 and adoption of Resolution D-
1
1367-08-21.” Plaintiffs’ Motion includes an enumerated list of documents and materials they
request Northern Water to include in an administrative record. In general, Northern Water agrees
that the Court should enter an order in accordance with C.R.C.P. 106 requiring preparation and
certification of an administrative record with “the evidence in the record before” the Northern
Water Board of Directors, to the extent that Northern Water’s actions were quasi-judicial in nature.
However, Northern Water disagrees with some of the specifics of Plaintiffs’ Motion and proposed
order and responds as follows:
1. An administrative record is necessary for this Court to review under Rule 106 any
quasi-judicial actions undertaken by Northern Water’s Board of Directors during the August 12,
2021, proceeding. C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4). Northern Water believes both quasi-judicial and quasi-
legislative actions were taken at this proceeding and therefore an administrative record is needed
to review only those actions that are quasi-judicial.
2. Under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)(I), review of quasi-judicial action is “based on the
evidence in the record before the defendant body or officer.” There are several enumerated items
Plaintiffs listed for inclusion in the administrative record that Northern Water does not believe
comprise this administrative record. Specifically, Plaintiffs request that Northern Water state
whether any regulations exist governing “overturn proceedings” pursuant to section 31-23-209,
C.R.S. See Plaintiffs’ Re-Filed Motion, ¶¶ h, i. Such a statement is not a document that comprises
“evidence in the record before the defendant body or officer,” C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)(I), and cannot
be included in the administrative record, Higby v. Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of El Paso Cty., 689 P.2d
635, 639 (Colo. App. 1984) (holding that review under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) “is limited to a review
of the record only”).
2
3. As part of the administrative record, Plaintiffs also request that Northern Water
prepare a transcript of the August 12, 2021 proceeding. In lieu thereof, Northern Water proposes
to submit a video recording of the proceeding, which would reduce the expense and time of
preparing a transcript. Northern Water believes a video would be more than adequate and within
its discretion to include as substitute for a transcript. See Civil Service Commission v. Doyle, 483
P.2d 380, 383 (Colo. 1971) (“The certification of the record is an official act of the inferior tribunal
. . . .”). If the Court requires a transcript, however, Northern Water requests that such a ruling
include an express order that Plaintiffs reimburse Northern Water for these costs, along with all
other reasonable costs Northern Water incurs in preparing the administrative record. See C.R.C.P.
106(a)(4)(IV) (plaintiffs must pay for the reasonable costs of compiling the record).
4. According to Rule 106, the Court must determine a specified date by when
Northern Water must file the certified record along with a certificate of authenticity. C.R.C.P.
106(a)(4)(III). Plaintiffs’ proposed order does not specify this date and requirement. Northern
Water’s proposed order, attached herewith, proposes that the record be certified within 21 days
after Northern Water and the NISP Enterprise file their answer to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint.
3
Respectfully submitted: September 28, 2021.
TROUT RALEY
/s/ Peggy E. Montaño
Peggy E. Montaño, #11075
Bennett W. Raley, #13429
William Davis Wert, #48722
Mirko L. Kruse, #52488
1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1600
Denver, CO 80203
Telephone: (303) 861-1963
Facsimile: (303) 832-4465
braley@troutlaw.com
pmontano@troutlaw.com
dwert@troutlaw.com
mkruse@troutlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants, Northern Colorado
Water Conservancy District and Northern
Integrated Supply Project Water Activity
Enterprise
Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121, a printed or printable copy of the
document bearing the original, electronic, or scanned
signatures is on file in the offices of counsel.
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on September 28, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
DEFENDANT NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT’S
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ RE-FILED MOTION TO PREPARE AND CERTIFY THE
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD was served via the Colorado Courts E-Filing System, on the
following:
Name Attorney Organization
City of Fort Collins Marni L Nathan
Kloster
Nathan Dumm and Mayer PC
City of Fort Collins Nicholas Poppe Nathan Dumm and Mayer PC
City of Fort Collins John R Duval City Attorneys Office
No Pipe Dream Corp John Mclain Barth John M Barth Attorney at Law
Save the Poudre John Mclain Barth John M Barth Attorney at Law
S/ Meichell Walsh
E-filed pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121 §1-26 via the Colorado
Courts E-Filing System. A printed or printable copy of this
document bearing the original, electronic, or scanned
signatures is on file at the office of Trout Raley