Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018CV3112 - Sean Slatton V. Fort Collins Police Department, Todd Hopkins, Brandon Barnes And John Hutto - 137F - Exhibit F - Mccambridge Depo Excerpts30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 2 Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-03112-RBI-STV 3 _________________________________________________________ 4 SEAN SLATTON, 5 Plaintiff, 6 vs. 7 CITY OF FORT COLLINS, 8 Defendant. 9 _________________________________________________________ 10 VIDEOCONFERENCED 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF 11 THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY LIEUTENANT ADAM MCCAMBRIDGE 12 September 15, 2021 _________________________________________________________ 13 VIDEOCONFERENCED APPEARANCES: 14 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF: 15 TYRONE GLOVER, ESQ. Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP 16 1543 Champa Street, Suite 400 Denver, Colorado 80202 17 Phone: 303-571-1000 Email: tglover@kln-law.com 18 ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: 19 MARK RATNER, ESQ. Hall & Evans, LLC 20 1001 17th Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 80202 21 Phone: 303-628-3300 Email: ratnerm@hallevans.com 22 Also Present: John Duval, Esq., City of Fort Collins 23 24 25 Page 1 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 Q And then lastly -- and this one is not so 2 much for the court reporter -- your attorney may -- or 3 Mr. Ratner may, from time to time, make objections. If 4 he is instructing you not to answer, he will say so. If 5 he doesn't say so, then you can go ahead and answer. 6 He's making those objections to preserve the record. 7 A Okay. 8 Q All right? So let's go ahead and get 9 started. 10 Lieutenant, what is your current job? 11 A Currently, I'm a lieutenant in the 12 Professional Standards Unit at Fort Collins Police 13 Services. 14 Q How long have you been in that job? 15 A I've been in this job since July of last 16 year, so approximately 15 months. 17 Q So has the majority of your time in that 18 job been during the pandemic? 19 A Yes. 20 Q So tell me, how has that been? 21 A Well, it's been unique, I think, like it 22 has for everyone else. Worked remote part of the time, 23 and in the office now full-time, basically. So that adds 24 a level of uniqueness, I guess, as it does for everybody. 25 Q How, if at all, is the job different when Page 5 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 Q Okay. So just let's recap briefly so I 2 make sure my timeline is right. In 2013, you were a 3 sergeant in the Patrol Division. May of 2015, you became 4 a sergeant in the Criminal Investigations Division, 5 Impacts Unit. January 2019, you were promoted to a 6 lieutenant in the same Investigations Division. And then 7 in July of last year, you were promoted to lieutenant in 8 Professional Standards? 9 A Yes, sir. 10 Q What do you do as a lieutenant in the 11 Professional Standards Division? 12 A My current role, I'm in charge of the -- 13 I'm the accreditation manager for our agency. So I'm in 14 charge of our CALEA accreditation. I also oversee our 15 Crime Analyst Unit, and I oversee our Internal Affairs 16 Unit. 17 Q So Crime Management, Internal Affairs, and 18 I apologize. I didn't get the -- I think there was one 19 other, the first one that you mentioned. 20 A I'm the accreditation manager, so I oversee 21 our accreditation with CALEA. And then the Crime Analyst 22 Unit, and Internal Affairs. 23 Q And how old are you, Lieutenant? 24 A I'm 50. 25 Q And what did you -- before then, you were a Page 8 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 lieutenant in the Investigations Unit; and before that, 2 you were a sergeant in that same unit. What was the 3 function -- what was your function in that role? 4 A As a lieutenant? 5 Q Yes. 6 A So as lieutenant, I oversaw several units 7 within the Criminal Investigations Division. I oversaw 8 the Criminal Impact Unit, the Property Crimes Unit, the 9 Financial Crimes Unit, and our group of officers that 10 work at a Drug Task Force. So I didn't oversee the Drug 11 Task Force, per se; I was kind of the personnel liaison 12 for those officers that worked there. 13 Q Okay. And can you attempt to explain in, I 14 guess, as layperson terms, non-legal, non-law 15 enforcement, what exactly it is -- let's first start with 16 what exactly do you do in Professional Standards? 17 A Sure. Majority of my time is spent on 18 accreditation matters. So we are CALEA-accredited, which 19 means that we have gone through a process whereby an 20 organization has gone through and looked at our policies 21 and practices and given us -- awarded us an accreditation 22 after a lengthy process. It's my job to then make sure 23 that we maintain that accreditation. So that's an 24 ongoing process that we reassess every year. And so one 25 of my main functions is to make sure we are prepared for Page 9 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 involve? 2 A Well, it involves -- as I said, CALEA sets 3 a group of standards for law enforcement agencies to 4 achieve that are what are considered a gold standard of 5 law enforcement practices based on input from groups 6 from -- or from individuals and organizations around the 7 country. And those folks put together these sets of 8 standards, and then we agree to and do adhere to those 9 standards. So by doing so, we are making sure that our 10 policies and practices are meeting the highest standards 11 of accepted law enforcement practice. 12 Q And, I guess, let's -- specifically as it 13 relates to excessive force -- 14 A Okay. 15 Q -- you know, this case -- are you aware of 16 when this incident took place? 17 A Yes. 18 Q So it was -- I'll represent to you that it 19 was 2016. Have those standards and practices, those 20 CALEA standards and practices, changed as it relates to 21 excessive force since 2016? 22 A Well, we were not CALEA-accredited in 2016. 23 We were -- we became CALEA-accredited in 2019. We were 24 in the process -- we began the application process in 25 2015; however, we had not achieved accreditation at that Page 11 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 for third-degree trespass? Yes. So... 2 Q (By Mr. Glover) And I guess I'm curious. I 3 mean, what I'm trying to understand is what is -- you 4 know, within the law, what is the policy, practice, and 5 training for your department on a case like this, where 6 you've asked somebody to comply with an order? Is it 7 your practice and training that if they don't immediately 8 comply or they hesitate for even a second, you can 9 just -- you can arrest them? Is that the practice in 10 Fort Collins? 11 MR. RATNER: Object to form. It might 12 actually be outside, a little bit, of the scope. 13 But, Lieutenant, you can answer. Do you 14 understand the question, Lieutenant? 15 THE DEPONENT: Yeah. 16 A The practice is to assess every situation 17 individually. There is no blanket policy or practice 18 that says if you ask somebody to leave, they don't leave, 19 you give them five minutes, and then if they still don't 20 leave, then you can cite them. There is nothing like 21 that, obviously. Every situation, like I said, is 22 different. 23 Now, there are a number of factors that may 24 have gone into Hopkins' decision. I don't know. I 25 wasn't there, and there's not a lot of detail to explain Page 50 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 Q Correct. 2 A It is within Fort Collins training, yes. 3 Q Is it within Fort Collins practice? 4 MR. RATNER: Object to form. 5 Q (By Mr. Glover) The use of the baton. 6 MR. RATNER: Same objection. 7 A Yes. 8 Q (By Mr. Glover) And is it in accordance 9 with Fort Collins policy the way that the baton was used 10 in this circumstance? 11 A Yes. 12 Q Tell me a little bit about how -- you know, 13 what is the practice and policy for baton use as it 14 relates to someone who's walking away, like we saw in 15 this situation? 16 MR. RATNER: Object to form. 17 A So this is -- in Officer Hopkins' mind, I 18 believe, based on all this, this is now an obstruction 19 and resisting case. Mr. Slatton has been told he's been 20 detained, and then was told he was under arrest. And 21 Mr. Slatton clearly said, No, I'm not; continued to walk 22 away. 23 So, you know, per our policy, officers are 24 justified using reasonable and appropriate force to 25 effect an arrest. And I think, you know, we had the Page 56 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 original charge of third-degree trespassing, which is a 2 summons-able offense, which progressed into an arrestable 3 offense once we reached the levels of obstruction and 4 then resisting after that. 5 So in those circumstances -- and then you 6 look at the actual circumstance of the officers 7 attempting to arrest Mr. Slatton. What does that look 8 like from an arrest control standpoint? The baton, in 9 this situation, was an option to effect an arrest of a 10 resisting person. 11 Q (By Mr. Glover) So are you saying, in your 12 view, at the moment before -- immediately before Officer 13 Hopkins hits Mr. Slatton on the leg, that he is resisting 14 arrest? 15 A Yes. Mr. Slatton has been told he's under 16 arrest. He's been told to stop. He does not. He says, 17 I'm not under arrest. He uses those words. And 18 continues to walk away, defying the commands of both 19 officers. 20 So, yes, he was resisting arrest prior to 21 being struck with the baton. 22 Q And, Lieutenant, you testified in -- or 23 have you been involved as a patrol officer otherwise in 24 resisting-arrest cases? 25 A Yes. Page 57 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 Q So you're familiar with resisting arrest in 2 Colorado, right? 3 A Yes. 4 MR. RATNER: Object to form. 5 Q (By Mr. Glover) And I just want to make 6 sure we're talking about the same resisting arrest. This 7 is the Class 2 misdemeanor of resisting arrest? 8 A Yes, sir. 9 Q And this is the one that makes it a crime 10 to use threats, force, or violence against the police 11 officers to resist arrest, right? 12 A Yes. 13 Q So, I guess, under these circumstances, 14 what threats, force, or violence was Mr. Slatton using 15 prior to being struck with the baton? 16 MR. RATNER: Object to form. 17 A Well, when you -- as an officer, if you 18 tell somebody they're under arrest, they begin to walk 19 away and then use the words, "No, I'm not," that 20 indicates that there is a level of resistance there that 21 is going to require something more than your words, 22 likely, to effect that arrest. In that -- and due to 23 that, that's a dangerous situation for the subject and 24 for the officer who could -- you know, that could result 25 in bodily injury for the officer. So that is possible. Page 58 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 Q (By Mr. Glover) I guess that wasn't my 2 question. You had said that the force was justified 3 because he was resisting arrest at that point. And my 4 understanding of resisting arrest in Colorado is there 5 needs to be a threat, force, or violence against the 6 officer in order for them to be resisting. 7 My question was: At what point prior to 8 being hit with the baton was he using threats, force, or 9 violence against the officer? And if he wasn't, then 10 that could be the answer. If you have other reasons for 11 why you thought it was justified, I think you just 12 articulated it, but my very specific question is: Did 13 you observe any threats, force, or violence in resisting 14 arrest? 15 MR. RATNER: Object to form. 16 A I would -- as an officer, I could interpret 17 his statement of -- in response to, "You're under 18 arrest," his statement of, "No, I'm not," as a threat. 19 Q (By Mr. Glover) And threatening what in 20 particular? 21 A Threatening the fact that the officer -- 22 he's basically telling the officer, You're going to have 23 to -- he's telling the officer he's going to have to do 24 more to arrest him or do something to arrest him, because 25 he is not going into custody. Page 59 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 Q Just to finish off the video. So we have 2 the baton strike. 3 (Playing video.) 4 Q And then the OC spray. 5 A Yes. 6 Q So was the OC spray in accordance with Fort 7 Collins training, customs, practices, and policies, in 8 your view? 9 MR. RATNER: Object to form. You mean the 10 use of the OC spray? 11 Q (By Mr. Glover) The use of the OC spray. 12 A Yes. Officer Hopkins was continuing to try 13 to get Mr. Slatton to comply and take him into custody at 14 that point. 15 Q And so in your view, in Fort Collins' view, 16 that amount of force to take him into custody on a 17 summons-able petty offense was appropriate? 18 A Well, at that point, we're not dealing with 19 the petty offense only. We're dealing with the other 20 crimes that have been committed at this point. So 21 there's probable cause for the other related crimes of 22 the actions of Mr. Slatton that happened from the time 23 that he committed the crime of third-degree trespass 24 until he was -- or during the time he was standing there. 25 The application of OC, there's other crimes that occurred Page 60 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 the situation with Mr. Slatton. Was there any sort of 2 Internal Affairs investigation into what happened? 3 A No. 4 Q Was there a use of force investigation? 5 A Yes. 6 Q What is your understanding of what happened 7 during that use of force investigation? 8 A So that investigation was undertaken by 9 Sergeant Heather Moore. She responded -- so these are -- 10 that was what we call a Level I use of force. Those 11 are -- on every use of force incident, a supervisor is 12 required to respond and investigate, to respond to the 13 scene and investigate. Sergeant Moore -- the 14 responsibility fell on Sergeant Moore to do this. So she 15 undertook the investigation that night. 16 Q And prior to being involved in this case, 17 were you aware of the use of force investigation? 18 A No. 19 Q Other than Sergeant Moore, you know, who is 20 aware, you know, in Fort Collins of this investigation? 21 A Well, as part of the data collection 22 function after use of force, officers are required to 23 fill out certain documents and certain systems that then 24 transfer up through the chain of command. So those 25 sergeants and lieutenants would ultimately be aware of Page 69 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 after the investigation was completed and the findings 2 were -- and there were findings that were found. 3 Ultimately, as I mentioned before, the 4 officer was exonerated. The CRB reviewed the 5 investigation, confirmed that. And the chief at the time 6 ultimately concurred with that -- with those findings. 7 Q And just a brief detour, so that I have the 8 context as to what would have been, I guess, the process 9 for these Internal Affairs investigations. Just take me 10 through briefly, you know, what happens, who reviews 11 what, who is involved in this exoneration. 12 A So on use -- you know, use of force 13 complaints typically are what we call a level -- well, a 14 Type 2 -- Level 2 complaint -- I'm sorry -- which are -- 15 Level 2 complaints are investigated by Internal Affairs 16 and not the officer's supervisor. So use of force 17 complaints are investigated by the sergeant who sits 18 underneath. 19 Those complaints certainly, if they come in 20 in written form and generally otherwise -- the results of 21 that investigation will go to the CRB for review, the 22 Citizens' Review Board, and for their input. And then 23 once their input is made on the investigation, it comes 24 back -- they give a recommendation, both the City manager 25 and the chief of police, whether they concur or don't Page 83 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470 30(b)(6) City of Fort Collins Lieutenant Adam McCambridge - September 15, 2021 1 recommendations on some of these cases. On -- I will say 2 at the Level I uses of force -- and in our policies and 3 procedures, Level 1 uses of force are things like -- 4 generally, things like personal weapons, like going 5 hands-on with somebody or using -- using OC spray or 6 baton is considered Level 1 use of force. And those 7 things are investigated and looked at by the supervisor, 8 as we've discussed here today. 9 Higher levels of force, such as using a 10 Taser, maybe using a canine, vehicle pursuit, that 11 elevates it so that those incidents are then looked at by 12 a Force Review Board, a standing Force Review Board, a 13 group of Lieutenants who then do the same kind of thing. 14 You look at it for training, look for supervision, and 15 make recommendations based on that. 16 So -- and, obviously, officer-involved 17 shootings is a Level 3 use of force. 18 Now, any incident can be moved to a level 19 of review by the assistant chief, deputy chief, or chief, 20 obviously. So one of those folks can say, Hey, I would 21 really want a review board or a special review board to 22 look at this particular incident, whatever it is, no 23 matter what level of force was used. So that does 24 happen. 25 Q Isn't it a given that if it goes to the Page 115 Veritext Legal Solutions 303-988-8470