HomeMy WebLinkAboutHUMAN BEAN AT SPRING CREEK - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - (2)Comment Responses
Human Bean at spring Creek
1 /10/2007
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: Context Diagram
Number: 51 Created: 12/28/2006
12/28/06] The context diagram does not show the surrounding context of the site.
Please revise to show how this site fits into the larger picture by showing the bus
stops/routes, bike trail etc.
Response:_ Please see the revised context diagram.
Topic: Elevations
Number: 50 Created: 12/28/2006
12/28/06] The building elevations for the front and back are the same. Where are
the doors, walk up window etc? Also, are both side elevations exactly the same?
Only one side is shown.
Response: Please see the revised building elevations.
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: Elevations
Number: 81 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Is the gate on the trash enclosure solid or open? The elevation does not
specify. If open, show spacing of vertical bars, indicating that compliance with
building code and ADA standards has been met.
Response: The gate is solid. Please see the elevations, I have updated the drawing
to clarify.
Number: 82 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Bollards are shown on the "side elevation" and nowhere else, not on any
plans or other elevations. Which is correct? Revise drawings accordingly.
Response: The bollards have been removed. Please see the revised building
elevations.
Number: 83 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Walk-up window will have to be accessible. Indicate on elevations with
dimensioning which service window is accessible.
Response: Please see the revised ramps between the handicap parking space and
the building on the site plan.
Page 1
Topic: Engineering
Number: 84 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Clearly delineate the location of the existing water line along the front of the
property in relation to the existing vegetation. Locate existing trees and shrubs
accurately, including dripline of tree.
Response: Please see revised landscape plan.
Number: 85 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] The 18 inch storm pipe outfall -is that existing pipe to remain or new pipe.
The existing tree next to the pipe may be impacted by the installation of a new pipe.
Clarify outfall pipe and accurately show the type of tree and dripline so that it can be
determined if this tree can be saved. If not, contact Tim Buchanan to discuss tree
mitigation strategies. Section 3.2.1(F&G) have to be considered and addressed in
locating any need pipe. Coordinate with Landscape Plans in regard to preservation
or removal of this and any other trees on -site.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan. We request a meeting in the
field with Dana Levitt and Wes Lamarque to discuss whether or not the existing
stormsewer outfall can be used. We would prefer to use the existing outfall to avoid
disturbing the mature landscaping.
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 12/14/2006
12/14/06] The following departments have indicated that they have no concerns
with this proposal: GIS, Park Planning, Water Conservation, County Assessor.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 5 Created: 12/18/2006
12/18/06] Rick Lee with the Building Department has attached the Current Building
Codes and Standards that will be enforced with this proposal.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 8 Created: 12/19/2006
12/19/06] Bonnie Ham (Growth Coordinator - US Postal Service): Developer must.
provide a mailbox in an agreed upon location.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: Current Planning
Topic: General
Number: 53
Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Created: 1 /3/2007 .
Page 2
1/3/07] General Note # 11, Cover Sheet refers to the Utility Plan for exact geometry
of parking areas. Utility plans do not show any geometry or layout information.
Provide complete layout information on Site Plan.
Response: The parking space dimensions are now shown on the site plan.
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 12 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Per Section 3.2.1(E)(5)(d) connecting walkways through parking lots
shall have one canopy shade tree per 40 lineal feet of such walkway planted in
landscape areas within 5 feet of such walkway. Since your proposed "connecting
walkway" crosses the drive aisle and cannot feature any landscaping, please add a
minimum of one canopy shade tree in the pedestrian/patio area adjacent to the
building (if there is room) and/or add more canopy shade trees in the landscape area
between the street and drive -through.
Response: We have added another tree in the landscape area between the street
and drive -through. Because it's proximity to a lighting pole, we have made this tree
an ornamental.
Number: 52 Created: 12/28/2006
12/28/06] Please see the redlined landscape plan from Forestry for comments from
Tim Buchanan.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan.
Department: Current. Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number. 71 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Clearly show difference between existing and proposed conditions. Plant
symbols do not stand out. Existing conditions that will be removed do not need to be
shown.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan.
Number: 72 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Show lighting fixtures on Landscape Plan.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan.
Number: 73 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Show all utilities on Landscape Plan so that conflicts between utilities and
landscape materials can be identified and/or avoided.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan.
Page 3
Number: 74 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Identify significant existing trees to remain and protect per Section
3.2.1(F&G) of the LUC. There are two trees along the College Ave. frontage to be
considered and one tree off -site on the slope of the Spring Creek embankment.
adjacent to the existing/proposed storm drain pipe to be addressed. Proposed
grading impacts both street side trees.
Response: Please see the revised Landscape plan.
Number: 75 Created: 1 /3/2007
1 /3/07] Plant symbols are not shown at mature size. Use appropriately sized
symbols consistently throughout plan.
Response: Please see the revised landscape. plan.
Number: 76 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Use different species of tree and placement in front Lawn area. Consider
pedestrian plaza in planting scheme.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan.
Number: 77 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Parking islands do not have sufficient plant materials. Shrubs and ground
covers are more appropriate and require less maintenance than irrigated turf.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan.
Number: 78 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] The proposed plant material along the south property line is not robust
enough to provide an adequate buffer. Large openings in the buffer will occur where
trees will be located. Additional plant materials in denser planting groups will
provide the type of buffer described in your Request for Buffer Modification.
Response: Please see the revised Landscape plan.
Number: 79 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] No seed mix or types of turf have been shown. The bottom of the water
quality pond will need "water tolerant" grasses. Provide information to address this
issue.
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan. In particular, see landscape
note #5.
Number: 80 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Surface drainage improvements are to be shown on the Landscape Plan..
Page 4
Response: Please see the revised landscape plan.
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: Modification of Standard
Number: 9 Created: 12/20/2006
12/20/06] The justification for the modification of standard request to allow less
than 5 feet of vehicular use area setback along the rear property line (Modification
request #4) is not specific as to why you cannot satisfy the standard. Please clearly
justify this modification request and show the dimensions of the proposed setback
on the site plan.
Response: Please see the revised modification request.
Number. 11 Created: 12/20/2006
12/20/06] Modification of Standards request #2 (vehicle use area between the
building and street) and request #3 (locate the building more than 25 feet behind the
right-of-way) should actually be submitted as a "Request for Exception to the Build -
to Line Standards." Please refer to LUC Section 3.5.3(13)(2)(d) for the standards
pertaining to build -to line exceptions. Your request will be evaluated per the
proposal's conformance with these standard(s) and a modification of standard
request will not be required if these alternative standards can be achieved.
Response: Please see the submitted "request for exception to the build -to line
standards."
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: Modification of Standard
Number: 54 Created: 1/3/2007
1/3/07] Summary of Request, Request For Buffer Modification states that a 45-50
foot buffer between Spring Creek and all vehicular circulation will be provided. The
buffer is measured from top of embankment (Section 3.4.1(E) - Buffer Zone able,
Note 3.C). The buffer zone proposed is much less than the distance cited in the
summary. This part of the request should be removed so that the summary
statement is accurate.
Response: Please see the revised buffer reduction request.
Number: 55 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Buffer Zone Standards 1.e response is in conflict with plans regarding the
preservation of significant existing rees. Upon resolving grading, utility and
landscape plan issues, this statement may need to be modified. If so, address.
Response: Buffer zone standard 1(c) refers to existing trees, and. has been revised
accordingly. Please see the revised buffer reduction request.
Page 5
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 10 Created: 12/20/2006
12/20/061 Please clearly label walk-up window, patio seating, sidewalk widths,
Spring Creek, existing retaining wall, building dimensions, etc. Also, on the site and
landscape plans please use different line weights and label existing features and
proposed improvements, including existing trees, proposed light poles/fixtures etc.
Response: Please see the revised site and landscape plans.
Number: 48 Created: 12/28/2006
12/28/06] How will pedestrians access the building .safely from the proposed
parking area (especially with handicap accessibility)? Perhaps you should continue
the pedestrian crossing across both drive -through aisles.
Response: Please see the revised site and landscape plans.
Number: 49 Created: 12/28/2006
12/28/06] The vault on the western edge of the site is not a Light & Power
transformer. Please clearly identify and label. Can this be rotated to gain
clearance?
Response: Coordination of the relocation and/or realignment of this vault will be
addressed during final compliance review.
Department Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 56 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Remove proposed grading contour lines from plan. Landscape Plan and
Grading Plan sufficient.
Response: Please see the revised site plan.
Number: 57 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Show all existing surface conditions and label. Show existing trees with
canopy/dripline. Include driveway access and plant material at the north property
boundary adjacent to College Ave. Show and label proposed improvements, i.e.
asphalt or concrete pavement, type of walks, island surface, curb cuts, etc.
Response: Please see the revised site plan.
Number: 58 Created: 1/3/2007
1/3/07] Difficult to read site plan - not enough clarity between existing conditions
and proposed improvements. Proposed improvements need to stand out from the
existing conditions. Recommend using a grey scale line type for existing conditions.
Page 6
Response: Please see the revised site plan.
Number: 59 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Insufficient buffer along east property line. Unless turning radius templates
preclude using a consistent outer traffic flowli_ne, the parking lot edge can be offset a
minimum of 5 feet per Section 3.22(J) of the LUC.
Response: Please see the revised modification request.
Number: 60 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Show traffic flow patterns through site, using flow arrows.
Response: We're not sure what this has to do with natural resources, but please
see the revised site plan.
Number: 61 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] The parking bay is dimensioned to 19 feet. Upon measuring the depth, it
appears to be 18 feet. Resolve deficiency.
Response: We're not sure what this has to do with natural resources, but please
see the revised site plan. The parking bay is 19 feet.
Number: 62 Created: 1 /312007
1 /3/07] The accessible parking space does not have accessible ramps/curb cuts or
a "safe travel route" as noted by note #1, Cover Sheet. Integrate required elements
into site design.
Response: We're not sure what this has to do with natural resources, but please
see the revised site plan.
Number: 63 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Accessible parking space requires signage at the head of the stall.
However, with the current layout, the sign is not protected from vehicles pulling into
the parking stall and coming to a halt at the curbline. Resolve conflict.
Response: We have added curb stops. Please see revised site and landscape
plans.
Number: 64 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] With all parking stalls ending at the curb line, which has less than 2 feet of
overhang, there is less than 12' of clear travel lane in the drive -through lane. This
conflict has to be resolved.
Response: We propose to provide the requited overhang by moving the parking
spaces 2 feet towards the north. This will still provide the required drive aisle width.
This detail will be addressed at final.
Page 7
Number: 65 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] The existing fence located within the property along the east property line
appears to be within one foot of the proposed back of curb line. Is the fence to
remain or will it be removed and reinstalled? Provide information on type and height
of fence. The fence has to meet the standards in Section 3.2.1(E.4) of the LUC.
Response: The fence belongs to the neighbor. It's and existing 6 foot cedar fence.
We don't propose to replace it.
Number: 66 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] An existing storm drain is shown on the Site Plan. Remove. Show on
Landscape Plan and on utilities plans.
Response: Please see the revised site plan.
Number: 67 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Show proposed light fixtures on Site Plan.
Response: Please see the revised site plan.
Number: 68 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Proposed sewer line needs to be shown on Landscaping Plan, not Site
Plan.
Response: Please see the revised site plan.
Number: 69 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Hand railing shown on island next to building should extend further to direct
pedestrians to cross driving lanes at pedestrian crossing.
Response: Our thought was that the purpose of this rail is less to direct the
pedestrians, and more of a safety barrier between the customers using the walk-up
window at the time of ordering and the drive lanes. We would prefer not to extend
this rail. Is this really a natural resources issue?
Number: 70 Created: 1 /3/2007
1/3/07] Project description discusses a pedestrian plaza in the southwest comer of
the site. With the water quality pond in this location, another location needs to be
integrated into the design, linking College Ave. sidewalk and the coffee shop.
Response: Please see the revised site and landscape plans.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maitland
Topic; Engineering
Number: 13 Created: 12/22/2006
Page 8
12/22/06] Refer to the Cover sheet —Please add Stuart Street to the Vicinity Map.
Move the Month and Year, updated, underneath the title. Provide benchmark data
2) to cover sheet per LCUASS Appendix E. Provide Geotechnical Engineers
address and phone along with a reference to the latest soils report. Enlarge text as
shown on. the redlines for scana.bility.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 14 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/061 Refer to the Plat — Please remove PDP from the title.. Clearly show, label
and dimension College Avenue ROW on the Plat, existing and proposed. Will need
to provide a minimum of 141 feet of ROW for a 6-Lane arterial standard section
57.5 half ROW). Provide a copy of referenced document for ROW dedication on
College Bk 1094, pg. 574. Show any off -site easements needed and label by
separate document.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 15 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] A CDOT Access Permit will be required for this project. Per discussions
with CDOT, a standard LCUASS driveway with radius curb on both sides will be
required. Please clearly show both sides of proposed driveway curb cut and call out
standard driveway with a detail added to the detail sheets. Any additional ROW or
off -site easements must be dedicated if needed to construct the driveway to
standard.
Response: Acknowledged. A meeting was held with City staff and CDOT
cone_ erning this project, so CDOT is aware of the proposed access. The driveway
has been revised and an access easement will be provided via separate instrument.
Number: 16 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Please add the City standard street cut note, attached to redlines, on the
Utility Plan sheet. A street cut may be needed for the driveway construction as
determined by the City inspector in the field.
Response: No street cuts for utilities are proposed with the project. We believe the
driveway entrance can be constructed without disturbing the paving in College,
however this detail will be further addressed at final. If still needed, the note will be
added to the plans at that time..
Number: 17 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Solid rectangular black boxes are showing on the Utility Plan sheet.
Please correct and clarify what these are.
Response: Our apologies, this was a plotting error and has been addressed.
Page 9
Number: 18 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Please use heavy solid line for proposed improvements and a lighter
weighted line, ghosted line, for existing improvements on the site. Label existing
items to be removed. See redlines for clarification.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 19 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Clearly show, label and dimension the limits of ROW for College Ave. on
the Utility Plan sheet and Grading Plan sheet. Existing and proposed.
Response: The western. ROW was not identified by the project surveyor. The ROW
is approximately 100' wide in this location.
Number: 20 Created: 12/22/2,006
12/22/06] Please show and label any existing buildings or improvements within 50
feet of the site on all 3 sides.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 21 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/061 Please show and label any off -site easements needed by separate
document on the Utility Plan and Grading Plan sheets.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 22 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Please show the existing rip rap pad at the SD outfall on the Utility and
Grading Plan sheets.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 23 Created: 12/22/2006
1.2/22/06] No less than four feet (4) of sidewalk may be added to an existing
sidewalk per City Code. The sidewalk on College Ave. must be removed and
replaced to a sufficient width to satisfy Transportation Planning staff. Please contact
David Averill with Transportation Planning for minimum sidewalk width, attached or
detached, along College Avenue. Please clearly show and label the limits of new
proposed sidewalk and connections to existing sidewalk to the north and south.
Response: The attached sidewalk has been revised to be 9 feet wide in accordance
With David's comments. This requires widening the existing sidewalk 4.5'.
Number: 24 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Please show the high point, grade break line at the entrance. No more
than 750 square feet of paved surface shall drain over the sidewalk, driveway
approach.:
Page 10
Response: Acknowledged.
Number-: 25 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Please use different line weights for existing and proposed grading topo.
Rotate all upside down contour elevations. Correct any overlapping text that will not
scan well.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 26 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Please show and label all storm drain pipe elevations at inlets, outlets
and bend points.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 27 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] Please add a LCUASS standard commercial driveway detail to the detail
sheets.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 28 Created: 12/22/2006
12/22/06] See Site Plan comments on redlines.
Response: See revised site plans.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: Plat
Number: 40 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] From Technical Services: Plat closes, area checks, legal matches.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 41 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] From Technical Services: There is an exception to lots 7 & 8 and this
plat only is involved with portions of those lots.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 42. Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] From Technical Services: Is a .utility easement needed on the north
portion of lot 1 across the emergency and access easements?
Response: Utility easements have been added to the plat.
Page 11
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Electric Utility
Number: 6 Created: 12/18/2006
12/18/06] Plat needs to show a 10 ft. utility easement along the east and west sides
of the property.
Response: Utility easements have been added to the plat.
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 7 Created: 12/18/2006
12/18/06] The electric system shown near College Ave. on the landscape plan
sheet 3 of 4 is not correct (these facilities do not exist as shown).
There are a couple of options concerning provision of electric service.. The nearest
existing electric transformer is at the rear of the Vision Eyeland building. This
transformer is 120/208 volt 3 phase. In order for this transformer to be the power
source to the Human Bean, there will need to be an off -site easement from the
transformer to the lot line of the Human Bean for installation of the electric service
by owner). The 2nd option is to tap the existing underground 13,800 volt power line
along the eastern end of this lot and install a new electric vault and pad type
transformer (at a. cost of appx. $9,000.00 plus normal electric development
charges). In this case, a location for the new vault & transformer would need to be
coordinated with Light & Power Engineering. However there appears to be no
available location for this electrical equipment. For both options, normal. electric
development charges plus electric system modification costs will be charged to the
developer., The developer will need to coordinate power requirements and costs
with Light & Power Engineering (221-6700).
Response: We propose to connect to the existing transformer behind the Vision
Eyeland. A utility easement will be provided by separate instrument.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 37 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] REQUIRED ACCESS: Afire lane is required.. This fire lane shall be
visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane
plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design
criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must
meet the following general requirements:
Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete)
capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used
only for temporary fire lanes or at'construction sites.
Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and
enforceable.
Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement.
Page 12
Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire
lane.
If a fire lane cannot be provided, the building shall be fire sprinklered. 97UFC
901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1
Response: Acknowledged. Our proposed fire lane does all this.
Number: 38 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] WATER SUPPLY: Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type
approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant
spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of
occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include: Commercial, 1,500
gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 300 feet to the building, on
600-foot centers thereafter. These requirements may be modified if buildings are
equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems.
97UFC 901.2.2.2
Response: No additional fire hydrants are needed for the project, as per discussions
at the review meeting.
Number: 39 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the
street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of six-inch (6) numerals on a
contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not
acceptable).97UFC 901.4.4
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: Traffic Operations
Topic: Traffic
Number: 29
12/22/06] The TIS is acceptable
Response: Acknowledged.
Issue Contact: Eric Bracke
Created: 12/22/2006
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: F/oodp/ain
Number. 43 Created: 12/27/2006
12/27/06] 1. It appears a very small portion of.the site is located in the Spring Creek
100-year floodplain. It is in the flood fringe, not the floodway. Please modify the
report to reflect this.
2. The City floodplain map included in the report has now been officially adopted by
FEMA, therefore there is a new map panel number. Please use FIRM Panel
08069C0987F, Community number 080102 in the report and include the attached
copy of the new map.
Page 13
3. From the plan it appears some landscaping will occur in the floodplain. This is
allowed in the flood fringe. Please include a note in both the report and the
Drainage and Erosion Control Plan: An approved Floodplain Use Permit is required
prior to the start of any construction or site improvements in the floodplain.
4. Please draw and label the floodplain line on the plat, drainage plan and
landscaping plan. We do not yet have the digital version of the new FEMA map,
however, you can use the City floodplain line since the two should be one and the
same.
5. Floodplain Admin. Contact: Susan Hayes, 416-2233.
Response: This will be addressed at final, as discussed at the review meeting. We
are retaining the stormwater redlines for now, and will include them with the first final
submittal.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 36 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26./06] Revise notes on required separation distances as noted on the redlined
plan.
Response: Please see revised site plan notes.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 44 Created: 12/27/2006
12/27/06] Since a new outlet pipe will be used, the outfall needs to meet current
standards. This may include additional erosion protection and realignment of the
outf all pipe to enter Spring Creek more in parallel with flows.
Response: As discussed at the review meeting, a field meeting will be set up with
staff to evaluate the existing condition. This will be addressed at final. We are
retaining the stormwater redlines for now, and will include them in the first final
submittal.
Number: 45 Created: 12/27/2006
12/27/06] Please revise water quality outlet structure detail to the current City
standard. I can email an electronic copy to you.
Response: This will be addressed at final, as discussed at the review meeting. We
are retaining the stormwater redlines for now, and will include them in the first final
submittal
Number: 46 Created: 12/27/2006
12/27/06] Please label storm sewer on the Drainage Plan including size, length,
and type.
Page 14
Response: This will be addressed at final, as discussed at the review meeting. We
are retaining the stormwater redlines for now, and will include them in the first final
submittal.
Number: 47 Created: 12/27/2006
12/27/06] Please include a basin and a water quality pond summary table on the
Drainage Plan.
Response: This will be addressed at final, as discussed at the review meeting. We
are retaining the stormwater redlines for now, and will include them in the first final
submittal.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterissue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: WaterMastewater
Number: 30 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] Coordinate water service location with landscaping to provide minimum
separation distances.
Response: Acknowledged. The water service has been placed to minimize
disturbance to the existing vegetation.
Number. 31 i
Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] Add notes at connection of sewer service to existing MH to core drill
opening in MH and to re -shape bench to channelize flow.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 32 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] Show curb stop on water service.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 33 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] On overall utility plan, label sewer service clean -out as traffic rated.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 34 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] Include correct detail for 3/4-inch meter pit.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 35 Created: 12/26/2006
12/26/06] Provide evidence of a recorded easement from the property to the north
to this property for the offsite portion of the sewer service.
Page 15
Response: This utility easement will be provided by separate instrument.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: Zoning
Number: 2 Created: 12/15/2006
12/15/06] The walk-up window should be labeled on the site plan.
Response: Please see the revised site plan.
Number: 3 Created: 12/15/2006
12/15/06] If there is going to be outdoor seating, then please show the location of
Where this will be. Will it be the patio in the: front of the building ( I assume it's a
patio since it's not labeled) or will it be elsewhere?
Response: Please see the revised site and landscape plan.
Number: 4 Created: 12/15/2006
12/15/06] Label dimensions of building footprint on site plan.
Response: Please see revised site plan.
Page 16