Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2016-06-01Community Development and Cft'Yof Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6760 970.224.8134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview September 17, 2013 The Neenan Company 2607 Midpoint Dr Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Fort Collins Senior Center Expansion, MA130062, Round Number Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Peter Barnes, at 970-416-2355 or pbarnes@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970.221.6501, tsiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 09/17/2013: The note that was added on sheet C3 references 2ft curb and gutter. Please revise note to match existing or reference LCUASS detail 701 (2.5ft curb and gutter) 08/23/2013: Add a note to sheet C1 referencing the existing driveway is to be removed and replaced with vertical curb and gutter and detached sidewalk to match existing conditions. Please show the sidewalk repair on Sheet C1 as well. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 09/17/2013: Please add a note referencing this on sheet C0.20 and C1.00 08/23/2013: If the existing drive approach that is to remain is not compliant with current ADA standards then removal and replacement of the drive approach will be required as part of this project. Page 1 of 8 f Fd!Cdhns Development and August 22, 2013 Michael Chalona The Neenan Company 2607 Midpoint Dr Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Fort Collins Senior Center Expansion, MA130062, Round Number 1 Community Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.coMdeve/opmenireview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you should contact the individual commenter directly. Please note that I'm still waiting for comments from Forestry, Engineering, and Stormwater Floodplain. Once I receive those comments I'll pass them on to you and let you know how many copies of the revisions you'll need to submit for Round 2. Peter Barnes Zoning Administrator Neenan response in blue JVA response in green 2013-08-29 Comment Summary: Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224-6143, lexacgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: Per the ECS submitted for the project, additional tree and shrub planting materials needs to be added adjacent to the New Mercer canal. Please use only native plantings, to the extent feasible, e.g., chokecherries, plums, etc. and not the Tatarian Maple. Replaced Maples with Chokecherry tree. Please also provide the specifications for the Rocky Mountain Native Mix. Sent specs by email Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartin fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2013 08/08/2013: Light & Power records indicate the existing electric service to this building is 1600 amps at 277/480 Volts. If any changes are required to the electric capacity and/or relocation of the transformer or power lines, please contact Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700. JVA Response: Comment noted Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218.2932, jschlamV-fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/19/2013 08/19/2013: The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. The current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. The Erosion Control Plan needed 1) a detail of the outlet structure protection for the sediment trap. JVA Response: Inlet protection detail is shown on CE1.10. 2) Sequence Chart (Example provided) JVA Response: Sequence chart has been added to the plans as a guide. Detail chart to be generated by contractor with the full SWMP. 3) Standard Erosion Control Notes. JVA Response: CoFC standard notes have been added to the plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/19/2013 08/19/2013: The Erosion Control Report (Stormwater Management Plan) submitted were incomplete and not current neither for City Erosion Control Requirements nor for State SWMP requirements. Please refer to the Erosion Control Check Sheet for the missing aspects of the report. Also included is a copy of the Erosion Control accompanying document to help clarify the requirements. JVA Response: Drainage report has been provided. Additional SWMP documents will be provided by the contractor. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/19/2013 08/19/2013: The Site will also have to supply an Erosion Control Escrow Calculations. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com JVA Response: Escrow calculation attached. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wiamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/22/2013 08/22/2013: The slopes for the new detention pond are steeper than 4:1. Please revise. JVA Response: Slopes within the proposed detention pond have been adjusted to 4:1. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/22/2013 08/22/2013: The drainage design is still very preliminary. Please submit the SWMM model �1 p when completed for review to ensure the overall system will still function and meet the City's criteria. JVA Response: SWMM Model results has been included within the drainage report. If the actual SWMM model is required please contact Dondi Harper at 303-565-4955 dhamer@ivajva.com Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221-6588, jcounbf&cgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: There is a line over text issue on sheet A2.10. See redlines. Addressed, see plan. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 08/20/2013: No comments. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 1-2.01. See redlines. Addressed, see plan. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: There is a text over text issue on sheet L2.01. See redlines. Addressed, see. plan. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 5 08/20/2013: No comments. Topic: Site Plan Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 1-1.01. See redlines. Addressed, see plan. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffingtonM- cgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: Show ALL of the existing, onsite sanitary sewer to the west of the building and proposed parking lot. Will there be any conflicts with the proposed detention pond D? JVA Response: The existing sanitary sewer to the west has been drawn in between the two surveyed manholes. It appears there will be no conflict with the proposed grading for pond D. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: Will there be any changes to water service for the facility? JVA Response: No anticipated water service changes are currently planned! f- Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: If the grease interceptor ends up inside the building, check with the Larimer County Health Department and Mark Taylor (416-2494) regarding any special requirements. Confirmed with health department, grease interceptor meets requirements Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970.416.2355, Pbarnes cgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: The site plan needs to more accurately or clearly identify the additions. The word 'addition' appears numerous times, with lines pointing to areas, but the extent of the additions needs to reflect dimensions and/or floor area, with the boundaries clearly delineated. Addressed, see plan. Added hatch for all addition areas. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 08/20/2013: The parking stall dimensions need to be shown for the new parking areas Addressed, see plan. FORESTRY 1 Landscape Plans 08/28/2013: Provide a tree protection and mitigation plan. Include inventory of impacted existing trees identified as to species, size, condition, transplant, remove or protect and mitigation. Provide this information on a separate landscape sheet that identifies numbered exiting trees impacted with the inventory table. Tree protection specifications notes should be included. Active 1 Tim Buchanan 08/28/2013 Addressed, added sheet. Note located on sheet L2.50 2 Landscape Plans 08/28/2013: The Landscape Architect should set up a meeting with the City Forester to receive tree species selection and specification comments to incorporate into the final landscape plan. Active 1 Tim Buchanan 08/28/201 Will set up onsite meeting: Department: Development Review Engineering Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tsieomund&-knov.com 1 General 08/23/2013: Add a note to sheet C1 referencing the existing driveway is to be removed and replaced with vertical curb and gutter and detached sidewalk to match existing conditions. Please show the sidewalk repair on Sheet C1 as well. Active 1 Tyler Siegmund 08/23/2013 JVA Response: Note has been added to the plan. See sheet CO.20 and C3.00 2 General 08/23/2013: If the existing drive approach that is to remain is not compliant with current ADA standards then removal and replacement of the drive approach will be required as part of this project. Active 1 Tyler Siegmund 08/23/2013 JVA Response: The existing sidewalk at the west drive entrance to the proposed parking lot appears to be ADA compliant. The proposed drive is matching existing back of walk and protecting the existing curb cut/drive entrance. LjaadnAJ`GfJ511pl,t, 3 General 08/23/2013: 3. Please add the standard sidewalk note to sheet C1 and the site plan: Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Active 1 Tyler Siegmund 08/23/2013 JVA Response: The note has been added to C3.00 - Ad g 06 51� F(0n 4 General 08/23/2013: 4. Please add the standard asphalt repair note to sheet Cl: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City of Fort Collins Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with city street repair standards.. Active 1 Tyler Siegmund 08/23/2013 JVA Response: The note has been added to C3.00 - C ya, 0 �9 0-4*0� riwa &W Y 6� _r Fv. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 09/17/2013: Repeat comment; please add the note to the site plan 08/23/2013: Please add the standard sidewalk note to sheet C1 and the site plan: Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 09/17/2013: Please reference on sheet C1 where you show proposed limits at c/g 08/23/2013: Please add the standard asphalt repair note to sheet Cl: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City of Fort Collins Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with city street repair standards. . Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Additional notes need to be added to the General notes section on sheet C0.01. Plesed include all notes from appendix E-1 and E-2 from the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). Contact me for a word doc. of the updated notes if needed. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Please add LCUASS drawing 701 (curb and gutter) to the details sheet. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224.6143, Iexb-fcoov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 09/16/2013: Here are my concerns: I wouldn't want to see a mix with either brome or crested wheatgrass in it. If they can substitute out another species for the Brome in the Rocky Mountain Mix, e.g., Western Wheatgrass or Canada Ryegrass, that would work well for me. Also, while the maples have been replaced, additional shrubs and trees have not been added on the western portion of the site. These still need to be added in order for me to remove my hold. 08/20/2013: Per the ECS submitted for the project, additional tree and shrub planting materials needs to be added adjacent to the New Mercer canal. Please use only native plantings, to the extent feasible, e.g., chokecherries, plums, etc. and not the Tatarian Maple. Please also provide the specifications for the Rocky Mountain Native Mix. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchanan@Acgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Page 2 of 8 • October 09, 2013 The Neenan Company 2607 Midpoint Dr Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Fort Collins Senior Center Expansion, MA130062, Round Number 2 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Port Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6760 970.224.6134 - fax kgov.com/deve%pmenhevlew Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. if you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Peter Barnes, at 970-416-2355 or pbames@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221.6501, taieamundMcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 09/17/2013: The note that was added on sheet C3 references 2ft curb and gutter. Please revise note to match existing or reference LCUASS detail 701 (2.5ft curb and gutter) 08/2312013: Add a note to sheet C1 referencing the existing driveway is to be removed and replaced with vertical curb and gutter and detached sidewalk to match existing conditions. Please show the sidewalk repair on Sheet C1 as well. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 09/17/2013: Please add a note referencing this on sheet C0.20 and C1.00 08/23/2013: If the existing drive approach that is to remain is not compliant with current ADA standards then removal and replacement of the drive approach will be required as part of this project. Page 1 of 7 /9'�Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 `)09/17/2013: Repeat comment; please add the note to the site plan E* 08/23/2013: Please add the standard sidewalk note to sheet C1 and the site plan: Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 09/17/2013: Please reference on sheet C1 where you show proposed limits at c/g 08/23/2013: Please add the standard asphalt repair note to sheet Cl: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City of Fort Collins Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with city street repair standards. . Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: Additional notes need to be added to the General notes section on sheet C0.01. Plesed include all notes from appendix E-1 and E-2 from the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). Contact me for a word doc. of the updated notes if needed. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 -- 09/17/2013: Please add LCUASS drawing 701 (curb and gutter) to the details sheet. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchananOccov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/28/2013 08/28/2013: Provide a tree protection and mitigation plan. Include inventory of impacted existing trees identified as to species, size, condition, transplant, remove or protect and mitigation. Provide this information on a separate landscape sheet that identifies numbered exiting trees impacted with the inventory table. Tree protection specifications notes should be included. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/28/2013 08/28/2013: The Landscape Architect should set up a meeting with the City Forester to receive tree species selection and specification comments to incorporate into the final landscape plan. Page 2 of 7 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/1712013 09/17/2013: Please use the following tree protection notes on L2.04 and L2.50 1. Existing trees marked for protection and preservation shall not be removed. 2. Heavy equipment shall not be allowed to compact over the root zone of existing trees. 3. Avoid cutting surface roots whenever possible. Sidewalks and paving levels should be contoured sufficiently to avoid damage. At any location where roots need to be disturbed or cut, contact the City Forestry Department to review prior to any disturbance or cutting. 4. Root cuts from excavation should be done rapidly. Smooth flush cuts should be made. Backfill before the roots have a chance to dry out and water the tree immediately. Root pruning shall be reviewed by the City Forestry Department and performed by a certified arborist for any roots over 2" diameter. 5. Prior to construction tree protection: All existing trees to retain as shown on the plans in dose proximity to any construction shall receive 5 feet height orange protection barrier fencing. Protection barrier fencing shall be supported by 1" X 1" or similar sturdy stock. For shielding of protected trees actuals location of tree protection fencing to be determined by the Forestry Department in the field with the contractor and may include partial fencing within the protection zone. There shall be no movement of equipment or storage of equipment, materials, debris fills or cut unless approved by the City forester. All existing trees to retain in dose proximity to any construction as shown on the plans shall receive concrete blanket wrapped from trunk base to a minimum 6' height. Modification or removal of tree protection fencing or blanket wrap shall be approved by the Forestry Department. 6. Within the drip line of any protected existing tree, there shall be no cut, excavation, or fill unless a qualified arborist or forester has evaluated and approved the disturbance. Approved cut, excavation or fill within the drip line of existing trees must be done by methods approve by the qualified arborist, which can include use of hand tools or air spade where determine necessary. 7. During the construction stage of development, the contractor shall prevent the cleaning of equipment or material or the storage or disposal of waste material such as paints, oils, solvents, asphalt, concrete, motor oil or any other material harmful the life of a tree, within the drip line of any protect tree or group of trees. 8. No damaging attachment, wires, signs or permits may be fastened to any protected tree. 9. All tree removal and any tree pruning that is needed due to construction shall be performed by a private tree service holding a current City of Fort Collins Arborist licensed and on a the City Forestry Department bid list. 10. Mulching over a portion of the root system of existing trees may be directed at individual locations to adequately prevent soil compaction during construction activity. 11. Loss or potential injury to any tree(s) shown to be retained due to contractor neglect or improper construction activities will result in a penalty of up to full damages for the assessed value of the tree(s) as determine by the City Forester or qualified arborist using the Council of Tree an Landscape Appraiser Guide for Plant Appraisal 9th edition . Loss or partial injury value will be assessed to the contractor. 12. A fine of one -thousand dollars may be levied against the contractor for each incident of unnecessary damage to exiting trees by not following the tree protection notes. Page 3 of 7 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: TREE MITIGATION TABLE: Bur Oak number 14 is shown to transplant but will be removed. Will Bur Oak number 13 be removed? If so contact the Forestry Department to clarify the reason for removal. If Bur Oak 13 is removed the mitigation number will be 2 upsized trees. Adjust mitigation numbers from the above changes. TREE SPECIES REQUESTED CHANGES: Use Chanticleer Pear along Raintree Drive because of the narrow parkway. Smaller ornamental tree will function better there. Specify these Chanticleer Pear as 2.5 inch caliper as some of the mitigation trees. Please change the four Sensation Boxelders in the parking lot island and peninsula in the west parking lot and the three Sensation Boxelder in the east parking lot islands to Skyline Honeylocust. Sensation is ok in the detention area. TREE LOCATIONS AND SIZES: Please specify the chokecherry to 6-8 feet multi -stem clumps. Due to some difficulty in transplanting specify Chinkapin Oak as 2.0 inch caliper and upsize other species for mitigation. Show street lights and interior security lights and provide tree light separations to avoid conflicts. If there are street lights along Rraintree Drive show those and keep Chanticleer Pear at least 15 feet away from the lights. Can an ornamental tree or trees be incorporated in landscape area on the east wall near the bike racks? Specify Chanticleer Pear along Raintree Drive parkway as 2.5 inch caliper. Specify the two Catalpas that frame the main entrance as 3.0 inch caliper. ORGANIC MULCH SPECIFICATION: Plant note number 20 should specify that organic mulch shall be City mulch. "Organic Mulch shall be provided by The City of Fort Collins Forestry Division from the Forestry wood lot. Contractor responsibe for hauling and placement. Contact the City Forestry Division at least three days before needed to arrange for pickup (2216660)" Page 4 of 7 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/17/2013 09/17/2013: TREE PLANTING DETAIL: Add information that says that the 4 inch earth saucer shall not apply to trees in irrigated turf areas after spray irrigation is activated. All saucers to be removed in turf areas before seeding or sodding and activation of spray irrigation. Add information that says that pruning of new trees shall only occur where approved by the City Forester. Specify organic mulch for all planting details for trees and shrubs. DEFINE PLANTING BEDS, AND WHERE MULCH WILL BE PLACED: CONTACT BILL WHIRTY PARKS MANAGER AND HIS STAFF TO GET INPUT AND DIRECTION THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: It is not clear for all the areas where mulch will be placed. Typically areas that are planted to shrubs are in a defined planting bed with edging separating the bed from turf. Please review with Parks staff where they want mulched beds established for shrub areas or in turf areas that will be difficult to mow. Clarify mulch surfaces on the landscape plan with labeling or symbols. APPROVING TREE AND OTHER PLANT LOCATIONS AND INSPECTIONS OF NURSERY STOCK: Please add these plant notes: Actual placement of all landscape plants shall be approved by the Landscape Architect and owner representative. Tree locations shall be staked or marked in the field. Landscape contractor is responsible to arrange for inspections of planting locations by the landscape architect and Owner representative. All plant materials shall be inspected by the Landscape Architects and owner representative prior to planting. Landscape contractor is responsible for arranging for inspections. STORAGE OF NURSERY STOCK ON SITE BEFOREE PLANTING: Please add notes or specification about storage of nursery stock on site before planting. WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS OTHER THAN WHAT IS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS: If there are written specifications other than the notes on the landscape plans than please provide Forestry and Parks staff a copy of the written landscape and irrigation specifications for review. UTILITY SEPARTIONS: Rework landscape note number 23 to incorporate all of the separations as described in LUC 3.2.1 K REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW: Provide Revised Landscape Plan to City Parks and Forestry Staff for review before Construction: Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartineghfcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/0812013 08/08/2013: Light & Power records indicate the existing electric service to this building is 1600 amps at 277/480 Volts. If any changes are required to the electric capacity and/or relocation of the transformer or power lines, please contact Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700. Page 5 of 7 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schism, 970-218.2932, ischlam�fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/09/2013 10/09/2013: 10/912013:1) Please describe how rainfall erodibility will affect the Type B soil, Le. will it cause riling, gulling etc... on page 3.2) Please add a section on "What is the closest water body that this site will effect? MS4 to Spring Creek?" 3) Please describe the Seed Mix (Ibs/pis/acre), Soil Amendment (City Code 12-130:12-132) and Mulch/Crimping Procedures (these three were referenced to a landscape plan but none was included to review) 4) Erosion Control Report should include an Initial percent vegetative density. This is important because later when describing finalization on page 8 it is called out for a'uniform vegetative coverage' which is not completely correct. It is 'uniform vegetative coverage reaching over 70°% of the initial vegetative density. 5) Please include a sequence chart. (Example was emailed 10/9/2013). Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wismargued9cgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08122/2013 08/2212013: The slopes for the new detention pond are steeper than 4:1. Please revise. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/22/2013 08/22/2013: The drainage design is still very preliminary. Please submit the SWMM model when completed for review to ensure the overall system will still function and meet the City's criteria. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, icountydfccov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 09/16/2013: No comments. 08/20/2013: No comments. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 Comment Originated: 08120/2013 09/16/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets L2.01 & 1-2.02. See redlines. 08/20/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet L2.01. See redlines. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/16/2013 09/16/2013: Please mask all text that is within hatched areas. There are issues on sheet L2.01. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 09/16/2013: There is text that is cut off on sheet L2.03. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 5 09/16/2013: No plans were routed to us for this review. 08/20/2013: No comments. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuf ingtoriMcgov.com Page 6 of 7 Comment Originated: 09/16/2013 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/20/2013 09/17/2013: Utility system maps show a sanitary manhole near the SW comer of the Senior Center site with an 8" sewer extending N-NE. It appears that this sewer may be under Detention Pond D. Provide a section along the center line of the sewer to show the resulting cover over the sewer line. 08/20/2013: Show ALL of the existing, onsite sanitary sewer to the west of the building and proposed parking lot. Will there be any conflicts with the proposed detention pond D? Page 7 of 7