The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPRESTON KELLEY SECOND AVAGO INDUSTRIES AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES BUILDING 3 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2016-05-24Avago Building 3 - City Staff Review #1 December 17, 2014 CITY'S FORMAL COMMENTS City0f F&t Cottinbow J0 1000�7 Development and Community Neighborhood Services Avenue 281 North College PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax eview fcgov.com/d`evelopm entr February 11, 2015 Mike McBride BHA DESIGN, INC 1603 OAKRIDGE DR Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Avago Building 3 - Office/Warehouse/Test Facility, MA150006, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Gary Lopez, at 970416-2338 or glopez@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slanoenberger cgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: No text should be in the revision blocks when mylars are submitted for signatures. The revision block is to be used to identify revisions to the plans after they are approved. Response: Noted. Page 4 of 10 Please notify CPI immediately upon receipt of these meeting minutes of any additions or corrections. Avago Building 3 - City Staff Review #1 December 17, 2014 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Need to show the Drainage Easements and the emergency access easement that is needed on at least one of the overall sheets. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Information on the process and procedure for the dedication of easements by separate document can be found at: http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php I can answer any specific questions you may have regarding this process. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: The area to be dedicated as drainage easement shall be determined by Stormwater. The area to be dedicated as emergency access easement shall be determined by PFA. Response: Easements have been provided or will be recorded with a separate instrument. Comment Number: 5 Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Include the department labels in the signature blocks on the utility plans. They are included and shown on sheet C300, but not the other sheets. Response: Labeling has been revised. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchananMcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/09/2015 02/09/2015: Tree Selection Comments: Shumard Oak is quite similar to Texas Red Oak and generally has better availability particularly at the 3.0 inch caliper size. Consider using Shumard oak in place of Texas red oak. Response: Texas Red Oak has been replaced by Shumard Oak. Scotch pine has developed some recent problems with insect issues that makes it not generally preferred for planting in the Fort Collins area. Consider using another species of pine. Response: Scotch Pine has been removed. Page 5 of 10 Please notify CPI immediately upon receipt of these meeting minutes of any additions or corrections. Avago Building 3 - City Staff Review #1 December 17, 2014 Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/09/2015 02/09/2015: An additional site meeting may be needed to identify the inventory and mitigation on trees 138 —146. Please schedule a site meeting with the City Forester if needed to obtain this information. Response:Done Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/09/2015 02/09/2015: Tree transplanting comments: 1. The final landscape plan should include the final tree transplanting information. It appears that trees to transplant are listed as TBD. Response: Trees listed as TBD have been corrected. 2. Show locations on final landscape plan where transplanted trees will be moved to if this is not already included.. Response: Final locations have been added to the landscape plan 3. Provide a note if it does not already occur that says in effect that all tree transplanting will follow the recommendations of a qualified tree transplanting contractor for sized of tree spade, season of the year, staking, building water basins and for providing after care which includes irrigation. Response: Notes have been provided. 4. A mitigation credit of 1 tree per transplanted tree can be recorded in the inventory schedule for any transplanted tree that meets or exceeds the mitigation size below and is less than 6 inches. For trees over 6 inches that are transplanted the mitigation credit would be the actual mitigation value. Canopy shade tree 3.0 inch caliper Ornamental tree 2.5 inch caliper Evergreen tree 8 feet height Response: Final mitigation calculations have been provided. 5. Please evaluate if any of the larger pinon pine which are trees 107-121 can be transplanted. Response: An additional category has been added. 6. On the final landscape plan for any transplanted tree list it in the reason column as transplanted and not removed. Response: An additional category has been added. Comment Number: 4 02/09/2015: Comment Originated: 02/09/2015 Please use some form of labeling that is quite clear such as an X for removal over the tree symbol and the letters T or K by the actual tree number for trees to Transplant or Keep in place. Response: Labeling has been revised. Page 6 of 10 Please notify CPI immediately upon receipt of these meeting minutes of any additions or corrections. Avago Building 3 - City Staff Review #1 December 17, 2014 Comment Number: 5 02/09/2015: Comment Originated: 02/09/2015 Please organize the tree information from the table below the table in the following format. Total trees to remove Total trees to transplant Total mitigation required Total trees kept in place Mitigation trees Additional tree planting Transplanted trees Total tree planting (sum of the three items above) Response: Table has been provided. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyleffcgov.com Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Please update the detention pond calculations in the drainage report using the City approved Modified FAA method for calculating detention volume. Response: Calculations have been updated Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Overall, the drainage and grading concept presented is excellent. It is understood there will be some evolution in the specifics of the design from what is presented in these plans so another detailed round of review may be warranted with the next submittal. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Please remove the drive circulation arrows from the Grading and Drainage Plans to avoid confusion with proposed site drainage pattern. Response: Noted and revised Page 7 of 10 Please notify CPI immediately upon receipt of these meeting minutes of any additions or corrections. Avago Building 3 - City Staff Review #1 December 17, 2014 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Please contact me in order to receive a detention pond outlet detail in CAD format that can be modified to match the proposed outlet configuration. Also please note the details and tables in the current plan set have not been updated to reflect proposed site design. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: The LID design looks great but it is understood this is also going to be evolving as the site design progresses. Regarding the proposed asphalt cuts, it appears these cuts have been configured in such a way as to minimize the amount of asphalt cut in order to minimize the pervious pavement requirements. If this is the case, I would support the idea of being a little flexible on this requirement in order to make these cuts work better for the proposed site work. Response: Noted and appreciated. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountyfficgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 02/06/2015: No comments. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum. Please provide the following information in the EXACT format shown below. If your project is started on NAVD88 datum: 1) PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK #1 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK #2 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: OR, if project has already been surveyed in NAVD29 Unadjusted datum: 2) PROJECT DATUM: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (OLD CITY OF FORT Page 8 of 10 Please notify CPI immediately upon receipt of these meeting minutes of any additions or corrections. s Avago Building 3 - City Staff Review #1 December 17, 2014 COLLINS DATUM) BENCHMARK #1 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK #2 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: If using NGVD29 UNADJUSTED the following equation statement will be needed. NOTE: IF NAVD 88 DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NAVD88 = NGVD29 UNADJUSTED + X.XX' Response: Noted and revised. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: All benchmark statements need to match on all sheets. Response: Noted and revised. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: The lighter text & linework marked on sheet C102 is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up on all sheets. See redlines. Response: Noted and revised. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: Sheets C207 & C208 have the titles running out of the titleblock and off the right side of the sheet. Response: Noted and revised. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: The sheets in the keymaps on sheets C209 & C210 are hatched backwards. Response: Noted and revised. Comment Number: 7 02/06/2015: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Response: Noted and revised. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 8 02/06/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Noted and revised. Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 Page 9 of 10 Please notify CPI immediately upon receipt of these meeting minutes of any additions or corrections. Avago Building 3 - City Staff Review #1 December 17, 2014 Comment Number: 9 02/06/2015: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Response: Noted and revised. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 10 02/06/2015: No comments. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 11 02/06/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Noted and revised. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinsonfficgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: traffic operations provided comments back via email on January 30th. This included wanting additional information for the TIS regarding the Ziegler/Harmony intersection, the right turn volumes at the HP entrance at Harmony, and a summary table of existing / proposed employees on site. Response: Traffic study has been updated. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle cgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/06/2015 02/06/2015: It is not anticipated there will be changes to the public water or sewer infrastructure with this project. If that changes, please contact Water Utilities Engineering to coordinate. Response: Noted. Department: Zoning Contact: Gary Lopez, 970-416-2338, gloaez ccgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/29/2015 01/29/2015: Please show building dimensions on site plan. Response: Dimensions have been provided. Page 10 of 10 Please notify CPI immediately upon receipt of these meeting minutes of any additions or corrections.