The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSOUTHSIDE SERVICE CENTER - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2016-05-24City of Fort Collins Current Planning PO Box 580 ' Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 ` 970.224.6134 - fax DATE: September 15, 2010 TO: Engineering PROJECT COMMENT SHEET PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard # 23-10 Transfort Facility Expansion Major Amendment PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: October 06, 2010 Note -Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems �] Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Y"'�l Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 1" Plat 48ite _Drainage Report _Other 4Utility kRedline Utility Landscape 3/23/2011 TO: Ted Shepard City of Fort Collins Current Planning Department 281 N College Ave Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Transfort Facility Expansion Response to Comments Please find our responses to the City's comments on the Transfort Facility Expansion. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING ISSUES: GRAPHIC DESIGN Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Andrew Carney Topic: Utility Plan umber: 35 Created: 12/29/2010 [12/29/10] Please remove the grading lines from the Utility Sheet - it makes the sheet difficult to read and are not required except on the grading sheet. RESPONSE: The contours have been removed from the Utility Sheet. Number: 37 Created: 1/4/2011 O[1/4/11] On the Master Street Plan this portion of Trilby is identified as a constricted arterial which requires a total OW width of 102 feet (51 foot half ROW). Currently, it appears as if the half ROW is only 50 feet. Please dedicate the required additional 1 foot of ROW. I[1/ SPONSE: The additional Vof ROW has been added to the Plat. mber: 47 Created: 1/6/2011 6/11] 1 have only reviewed the planset for items required prior to hearing, therefore additional comments will be de after the project hearing. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Department: Light & Power Topic: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Number: 34 Created: 12/27/2010 [12/27/10] The Light & Power electric development charges were paid in 1988 based on the original lot dimensions. Light & Power charges will apply for the expanded site. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Department: PFA Topic: Fire Issue Contact: Carle Dann Number: 36 Created: 1 /4/2011 PFA has no additional comments or concerns at this time. Thank you for your responses to prior comments. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 43 Created: 1/5/2011 [1/5/11] The Assistant City Forester's name is spelled incorrectly on sheet L1.1 of the Landscape Plans. RESPONSE: This has been corrected. Topic: Site Plan Number: 42 Created: 1/5/2011 [1/5/11] Please remove "County Road 34" from the Site Plan. RESPONSE: This has been removed from the Site Plan. Topic: Subdivision Plat Number: 38 Created: 1/5/2011 [1/5/11] The Subdivision Plat boundary & legal close. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Number: 39 Created: 1/5/2011 [1/5/11] Please remove "County Road 34" from the Subdivision Plat. RESPONSE: This has been removed from the Plat. Number: 40 Created: 1/5/2011 [1/5/11] Please correct the bearings with missing degree symbols on the Subdivision Plat. RESPONSE: This has been corrected. Number: 41 Created: 1/5/2011 [1/5/11] If the noted 6' easement on the Subdivision Plat remains, it will need to be locatable. RESPONSE: This easement has been relocated to the north project boundary. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 8 Created: 10/5/2010 [1/5/11] This text issue still remains. Sheet C4.0 is now sheet C5.0. [10/5/10] There are minor line -over -text issues on sheet C4.0 of the Utility Plans. RESPONSE: Acknowledged and corrected. Number: 44 Created: 1/5/2011 [1/5/11] There are line -over -text issues on sheet C1.0 & C3.0 of the Utility Plans. RESPONSE: Acknowledged and corrected. Number: 45 Created: 1 /5/2011 [1/5/11] Please remove "County Road 34" from sheet C2.0 of the Utility Plans. RESPONSE: This has been removed from the Utility Plans. Number: 46 Created: 1 /5/2011 (1/5/11] Please correct the word "chassis" spelling on sheet C2.0 & C3.1 of the Utility Plans. RESPONSE: Chassis is the correct spelling, it has been updated on all sheets. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 48 Created: 1/7/2011 [1 /7/11 ] Stormwater is ready for a hearing. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Brian Brian Williamson, ASLA LEED AP Landscape Architect Jim Sell Design, Inc. Fort Collins, CO 80524 brianwO-O imselldesign.com phone: (970) 484-1921 x 11 fax: (970) 484-2443 Collins F6rt Current Planning PO Box 580 ` Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750' 970.224.6134 - fax DATE: September 15, 2010 TO: Pavement Mgmt. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard # 23-10 Transfort Facility Expansion Major Amendment PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: October 06, 2010 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) ct*v* "�/ Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other, _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape s Fort Collins Selected Issues Report Date: 9/28/2012 TRANSFORT FACILITY EXPANSION MAJOR AMENDMENT PDP- TYPE I SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Engineering; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Andrew Carney Topic: Utility Plan Number:11 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] The utility plan set needs to contain a utility sheet. Number:12 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] Add #48 to the general construction notes. See redlines. Number:13 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] The utility plan set needs to show the entire site, as well as, off site conditions atleast 50 feet off site including grading, driveways, sidewalks, and other major features. Number:14 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] Add checklist item II. E. to the grading sheet. See redlines. Number:15 Created:10/5/2010 Unresolved [10/5/10] Finish grade elevations are needed for lot corners, and finish floors/top of foundation of buildings and lots. See checklist item II. D. Number:16 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] The utility set did not contain a utility sheet so I was not able to review any utility sheet items. Once submitted a review of the utility sheet may result in additional comments. Number:17 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] Are there any proposed emergency access easements? If so, as with other city properties, they will need to be "alignments" not easements. Number:18 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] On the NW corner of the site, off site grading is proposed which will require a off - site easement as well as a letter of intent prior to hearing. Number:19 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] As identified in Conceptual Review, this development will need to terminate Portner road to allow for turn around traffic. It appears that the public ROW ends just after the drive entrance to this site. Engineering is open to solutions on how to properly terminate Portner. Page 1 Number:20 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] Please show the existing sidewalks on the site, landscape, and utility plans. Number:21 Created:10/5/2010 Resolved [10/5/10] According to the current platted lot lines, almost all of the proposed improvements are happening off -site. Is a off -site easement/agreement proposed? A replat is encouraged. Number:22 Created:10/6/2010 Resolved [10/6/10] Please see redlines for additional minor comments. Number:35 Created:12/29/2010 Pending [12/29/10] Please remove the grading lines from the Utility Sheet - it makes the sheet difficult to read and are not required except on the grading sheet. Number:37 Created:1/4/2011 Pending [1/4/11] On the Master Street Plan this portion of Trilby is identified as a constricted arterial which requires a total ROW width of 102 feet (51 foot half ROW). Currently, it appears as if the half ROW is only 50 feet. Please dedicate the required additional 1 foot of ROW. Number:47 Created:1/6/2011 Pending [1/6/11] 1 have only reviewed the planset for items required prior to hearing, therefore additional comments will be made after the project hearing. Page 2 10 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW May 03, 2011 Brian Williamson Jim Sell Design 153 W Mountain Fort Collins, CO 80524 City staff and outside reviewing agencies have reviewed your submittal for Transfort Facility Expansion, and we offer the following comments: Department: Current Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 04/27/2011 04/27/2011: After the staff review on April 27, 2011, staff agreed this project is ready to submit for mylars. The one exception is with regards to Jeff County's comments below - please submit a .pdf document of the three sheets that have minor issues to him (as opposed to the paper copies discussed during review) prior to submitting mylars. Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 2 Created: 04/27/2011 04/27/2011: There is a condition of approval on this plan to provide a revised lighting plan "demonstrating that pole -mounted lighting along the edge of the new concerete paved area for bus operator training complies with Section 3.2.4 of the Land Use Code." The concern from the neighbors was glare and lighting from the parking area. The revised plan now includes a detail that shows a full -cutoff lighting structure and meets Section 3.2.4 of the Land Use Code. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 04/25/2011 04/25/2011: As a reminder, a site visit with Nstural Areas (Rick Bachand) and myself will need to be coordinated prior to construction to assess the site for prairie dog and potential burrowing owls. Let's tentatively discuss timeframes on Wednesday. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine Topic: General Number: 1 04/08/2011: No comments. Department: PFA Contact: Carle Dann Created: 04/08/2011 0- Department: PFA Topic: General Contact: Carle Dann Number: 1 Created: 04/22/2011 04/22/2011: Please refresh my memory. I thought we had agreed upon FIRE LANE NO PARKING signs instead of NO PARKING BETWEEN SIGNS, as well as no red curb paint for the emergency access alignment. I apologize if I'm not recalling this correctly ... ? Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 04/27/2011 04/27/2011: Please see minor comments on the redlined plans. Most comments are regarding additional details for drainage or erosion control improvements. Number: 2 Created: 04/27/2011 04127/2011: Please add an erosion control escrow calculation in the drainage report. Number: 3 Created: 04/27/2011 04/27/2011: Please add a 4th row (hole) to the water quality outlet structure. See redlines. Number: 4 Created: 04/27/2011 04/27/2011: Please provide an erosion control plan and the drainage plan in the utility plan set. Department: Technical Services Topic: Building Elevations Number: 52 04/26/2011: No comments. Topic: Construction Drawings Contact: Jeff County Created: 04/26/2011 Number: 54 Created: 04/26/2011 04/26/2011: There is still aline over text & text over text issue on sheet C5.0, Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 51 Created: 04/26/2011 04/26/2011: No comments. Topic: Plat Number: 47 Created: 04/26/2011 04/26/2011: The boundary and legal close. Page 2 Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County Topic: Plat Number: 48 Created: 04/26/2011 04/26/2011: The boundary and legal do not match. See redlines. Number: 49 Created: 04/26/2011 04/26/2011: The bearing in the basis of bearings statement is missing the degrees symbol. Number: 53 Created: 04/26/2011 04/26/2011: Please "locate" the 30' waterline easement at the north end of the property. Topic: Site Plan Number. 50 Created: 04/26/2011 04/26/2011: There are text over text issues. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to contact me at 970-221-6343. Sincerely, !� I.00 Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 3 Re: Transfort Expasion Major Amendment Page 1 of 2 Andrew Carney From: Langenberger, Sheri Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 3:29 PM To: Carney, Andrew Subject: FW: Transfort Expansion Major Amendment Fyi 1 resolved the comment that you had in DMS — so we now do not comment on this. I also talked to Steve D about the fact that the area that needs to be used as part of the back up area is on PSD property and since it is built as a street and as such the City probably maintains it we are just going to leave it the way that it is. From: Carie Dann [mailto:cdann@poudre-fire.org] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 2:39 PM To: Langenberger, Sheri; Kechter, Ron; Shepard, Ted Subject: Re: Transfort Expasion Major Amendment All, I'm sorry I was unable to attend yesterday's Transportation Coordination meeting. However, I did speak with Sheri about the Portner Road dead-end issue and this letter serves to present my suggestion and reasoning to resolve the issue. Ted, let me know if you want me to insert this into DIMS. FCLUC and the 2006 IFC (with local amendments) require a turnaround of at least 100 feet in diameter at the end of a dead-end street. In case you want the specific wording: FCLUC 3.6.2: (B) Cul-de-sacs shall be permitted only if they are not more than six hundred sixty (660) feet in length and have a turnaround at the end with a diameter of at least one hundred (100) feet. Surface drainage on a cul-de-sac shall be toward the intersecting street, if possible, and if not possible a drainage easement shall be provided from the cul-de-sac. If fire sprinkler systems or other fire prevention devices are to be installed within a residential subdivision, these requirements may be modified by the City Engineer according to established administrative guidelines and upon the recommendation of the Poudre Fire Authority. (C) Except as provided in Subsection (B) above for cul-de-sacs, no dead-end streets shall be permitted except in cases where such streets are designed to connect with future streets on abutting land, in which case a temporary turnaround easement at the end of the street with a diameter of at least one hundred (100) feet must be dedicated and constructed. Such turnaround easement shall not be required if no lots in the subdivision are dependent upon such street for access. Amendment D103.4 Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D 103.4. (Table D shows no turnaround required if the dead end is 0-150 feet in length.) Here's my thinking. The distance from the northernmost drive cut into Transfort, to the farthest end (dead end) of Portner is 140 feet. Since we have agreed that we can back apparatus up to 150 without needing a turnaround, what I propose doing is counting the drive cut as the turnaround location for apparatus. In other 12/29/2010 Re: Transfort Expasion Major Amendment Page 2 of 2 words, we could back apparatus the 140 feet from the end of Portner to the drive cut, and then do a K turn to leave the area. It meets the intent of the code (maximum backing distance of 150 without some other means to turn around). Also, and probably more importantly, the Transfort building is fire sprinklered. I know this differs from The Grove project turnaround. However, there are two big differences. No. 1, while these are both infill projects, The Grove had room to accommodate an established, City turnaround design that met the needs of PFA, developers and The Gardens. And No. 2, The Grove is a multi -family, residential project — yes, those buildings are sprinklered, too, statistically speaking, an R2 poses a higher risk for fire occurrence, injuries and death, which prompts us to ensure we can turn around and maneuver apparatus in as quick a manner as possible. Thanks and have a good weekend. Carie ut . rkrr' Carie Dann ICC Fire Inspector II/CO Firefighter II Poudre Fire Authority 102 Remington St. Fort Collins, CO 80524 Phone 970.219.5337 Email cdann.@.poud_re_-fireo_rg 12/29/2010