The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIGDEN FARM SEVENTEENTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2014-08-28[tins Current Planning PO Box 580 * Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 * 970.224.6134 - fax DATE: April 26, 2013 PROJECT COMMENT TO: Deve opmen Review En ineering PROJECT PLANNER: Seth Lorson SHEET PDP130015 Rigden Farm Filing Seventeen PDP - Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: May W2013 Note - Please identify vour redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or ACCELA) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other, _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Street Tree Selection: Use species as street trees selected from the City Street Tree List. The following species are not on that list. Confirm all street tree species are from the City Street Tree List. JR: SPECIES OF TREES HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO THE CURRENT APPROVED LIST. Sterling Silver Linden Cimarron Ash Use only canopy shade trees as street trees unless ornamental trees are placed by street lights. Some ornamental trees are being used as street trees. JR: ORNAMENTAL TREES HAVE BEEN REMOVED. Comment Number: 2 05/15/2013: Street Tree Placement: Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 Street trees should be spaced 30-40 feet between trees. Many street trees are closer than that spacing. (LUC 3.2.1 D 2 a) If two or more consecutive residential lots along a street each measure between forty and sixty feet in street frontage width, one tree per lot may be substituted for the thirty to forty foot spacing requirement. Group species and provide variety for the street tree design as illustrated in the City of Fort Collins Streetscape Design Standards Provide Minimum Species Diversity LUC 3.2.1 D 3 Place street trees from utilities, street lights, signs and corners to comply with 3.2.1 K. Some trees are placed very close to corners so should be moved away. Also space 8 feet away from driveways. JR: LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE BEEN UPDATED ACCORDINGLY Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Add Landscape Notes: • Street trees shall be planted by the developer using a qualified landscape contractor. • The developer shall contact the City Forester to inspect all street tree plantings at the completion of each phase of the development. All trees need to have been installed as shown on the landscape plan. Approval of street tree planting is required before final approval of each phase. Failure to obtain approval by the City Forester for street trees in a phase shall result in a hold on certificate of occupancy for future phases of the development. • The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly Page 1 of 8 loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. JR: NOTED Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please edit Landscape note 16 to read 6 feet between water and sewer service lines. Also add a sentence to this note that says Street trees shall be placed at least 8 feet away from the edges of driveways and allys. JR: DONE Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Erosion Control Material for this site is based off the old standards, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com JR: SEE SWMP SUBMITTED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wiamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Please add detailed grading to block 2. This should include typical single family lot grading and spot elevations for the swale behind the homes. JR: DETAIL HAS BEEN ADDED SEE GRADING SHEETS Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcqov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please change the sheet numbering, so that each sheet is not the same. See redlines. A WILL BE COMPLETED BEFORE SUBMITTING MYLARS Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: There are line over text issues. See redlines. JR: LINE OVER TEXT ISSUES WILL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SUBMITTING MYLARS Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please remove the dash from the title on sheet 1. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 Page 1 of 8 05/15/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 5. See redlines. JR: LINE OVER TEXT ISSUES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: There are text over text issues on sheet 5. See redlines. JR: LINE OVER TEXT ISSUES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please change the title on sheet 6, from "Detail Sheet" to "Details" so that it matches the cover sheet index. See redlines. JR: TITLES HAVE BEEN REVISED TO BE CONSISTENT Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please change the sheet titles so that sheet LP1 and the index on SP1 match. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please rotate all circled street names 180 degrees on sheets LP2 & LP3, so that they are plan readable. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please rotate "Tract C" on sheet LP3, so that it is plan readable. See redlines. JR: DONE Topic: Plat Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please change "men" to "persons" in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision. Is the Plat language the most current? JR: DONE Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please show the relationship of the signees between Sierra Resources Corporation, Wolverine Management Group Inc, RFMF LLC and Rigden Farm LLC. See redlines. JR: SIERRA RESOURCES AND WOLVERINE MANAGEMENT ARE OWNERS OF THE OPEN SPACE TRACTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THIS REPLAT THEREFORE THEY ARE SHOWN AS PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURES TO THE REPLAT Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please add ", monumented as shown and described hereon." to the Basis Of Bearings statement on sheet 1. JR: DONE Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please move the signature line for the Surveyor up above the name and LS number. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please remove the crossed out portion of the Title Commitment Note on sheet 1. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please show all distances to the hundredth of a foot. JR: DONE Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: What is the 1.8' at the northwest corner of Block 2 for? See redlines. JR: SEE Page 1 of 8 DETAIL A ADDED FOR CLARIFICATION Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please add bearings & distances for the 20' Access Easement running through Tracts B, C & D. If all these Tracts are access easements, you might remove this easement. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please add arrows to define the distances along Tract C. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: All curves require chord bearings and distances. JR: CB'S AND DISTANCES WERE ADDED Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please rotate "Anika Drive" & right of way information text 180 degrees so that it is plan readable. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please tie Blocks 2 & 3 to the Basis Of Bearings. See redlines. JR: WILL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO SIGNING AND RECORDING OF THE PLAT Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Will the Floodplain Easement at Reception No. 2000008442 be vacated prior to the recording of this Plat? If yes, the recording information must be shown. If not, realize that no building permits will be able to be issued on the affected lots; and bearings & distances sufficient to locate the easements must be shown. JR: FLOODPLAIN EASEMENTS VACATIONS HAVE BEEN RECORDED THEREFORE EASEMENTS DO NOT EXIST AND HAVE BEEN DELETED FROM THE PLAT Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please provide a detail for the northwest corner of Block 3. JR: DONE Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please add distances to the south line of Block 1. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the public land corners shown for control. JR: FIELD WORK AND LABELING WILL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO SIGNING AND RECORDING OF THE PLAT Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please provide descriptions for the public land corners shown for control, per Board Rule 6.8.2. JR: WILL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO SIGNING AND RECORDING OF PLAT Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please show all right of way dedication information per Development Review Submittal Requirement 3 (q). JR: DEDICATION INFORMATION HAS BEEN ADDED. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please check the distance along the south line of Block 3. The Lot distances add up to 695.36', and you have 695.41' listed. JR: DISTANCES HAVE BEEN CORRECTED Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please remove the "B" from Rigden Farm Filing Six south of Block 3. See JR: DONE Page 1 of 8 redlines. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please correct the date shown on sheet 2. See redlines. JR: DATES ARE CONSISTENT Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please change the legal description on sheet SP1 to match the Subdivision Plat. JR: DONE Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please rotate all circled street names 180 degrees on sheets SP2 & SP3, so that they are plan readable. See redlines. JR: DONE Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please rotate "Tract C" on sheet SP3 180 degrees, so that it is plan readable. See redlines. JR: DONE Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please revise the Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes to state the Local Entity Traffic Engineer at all instances that the NOTES currently state the Local Entity Engineer. This is a permanent revision for Fort Collins Signing and Marking Notes. Please revise your files to reflect the revision. JR: SIGING AND PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES HAVE BEEN DELETED AS NO ROADS ARE BEING BUILT WITH RIGDEN FARM 17. ALL ROADS WILL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE APPROVED RIDGEN FILING 6 PLANS Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please provide a Signing and Striping Plan, with dimensioning, for the project streets including the intersections with Ziegler Rd. JR: NOT APPLICABLE. SEE NOTE #4 Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Landscape Note #23 needs editing. Please review and revise. JR: DONE Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: Please include in the Landscape General Notes the following statement: Landscape plantings installed within the public street right-of-way need to conform to the current Sight Distance and intersection Sight Triangle standards in Chapters 7 through 9 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. Tree canopies should not obstruct visibility of traffic related Regulatory signage. JR: DONE Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 05/15/2013: This development proposal needs to submit a Traffic Impact Study. Any previous studies of this site are older than 3 years and per LCUASS 4.2.4 the project will need to submit a current traffic study. JR: SEE ATTACHED TRAFFIC MEMO Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Page 1 of 8 Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Add stationing for all sewer services. JR: SEE UTILITY PLANS Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: How will the water service locations be staked? JR: FROM CAD FILES Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Place utility plans on separate sheets from the grading plans. JR: DONE Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Schedule meeting with Engineering Development Review and Utilities Development Review to define how the record drawings will be formatted and presented. JR: MEETING WAS HELD AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT ASBUILTS WILL BE SHOWN ON RIGDEN FILINE 6 AND FILING 17 PLANS Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Show curb stop and meter pit locations on the utility plans. JR: DETAIL WAS ADDED Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Add meter pit standard detail. JR: METER WILL BE INSTALLED INSIDE THE HOMES Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Schedule meeting to review the basis for the water service locations. It appears that some services may end up under driveways. JR: MEETING WAS HELD Page 1 of 8 Rigden Farm 17th Filing May 16, 2013 Plat - The plat language is old. The language needs to be updated to our current language. Plat — Plat notes 2 and 3 should be removed as per the discussion at the staff meeting. Plat — A note needs to be added to the Plat indicating that the Development Agreement in place for Rigden Farm Sixth Filing shall continue to apply to these lots. Utility plans — Need to provide station information or distances from property line for the location of the shared driveways. Utility plans — more detail is needed for how the inlet is going to be constructed just behind the row along the shared driveway. Want to see a slight high point located so that lower flows are contained and enter the inlet and then how is it to be built. Utility plans — Block 2 what is the width and material of the path/ trail that runs across this property? Consistently show the ramps being constructed out to the enhanced cross walks. Some are shown to be built and others are shadowed out. Utility plans — Per a conversation with Roger Buffington and the inspector — we will want to see stationing on these plans, so that the locations of the services can be determined. Record drawings — I think Roger is going to provide some information on what we are going to want to see as for record drawings and we can discuss this more. But overall we will want two mylar sheet sets for the record drawings - One set that will be labeled and included with the 6`h Filing plans and one set that will be labeled and included with the 17th filing plans. That way the information will be there regardless of which plan set you go to look for it at in the future. City of F6rtCollins October 31, 2012 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224,6134 - fax fcgov. com Re: Rigden Farm 6th Filing Replat Description of project: This is a request from Meritage Homes to replat a total of 67 lots in Rigden Farm Filing 6. The replat includes eliminating the alley load tract and widening other lots. The site is zoned Low Density Mixed Use Residential. Please see the following summary of comments regarding the project request referrenced above. The comments offered informally by staff during the Conceptual Review will assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application, Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Zoning Contact: GaryLopez, 970.416.2338, glopez@fcgov.com 1. Note that modification #28 of the project notes for Rigden Farm 6th filing will not apply to the those lots where the alleys are eliminated. These and the lots where the lot width is increasing will remain with an 8' min. rear setback. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington fcgov.com 1. Existing water mains and sanitary sewers in this area are shown on the utility map provided to the applicant. JR: NOTED 2. Detailed discussions will be needed to determine how the water mains and sanitary sewers will be phased to provide a system with adequate reliability. JR: NO PHASING IS REQUESTED 3. Water mains and sanitary sewers must be installed on any streets that are to be paved. JR: NOTED 4. All water and sewer services must be extended to all lots (both sides of street) on all streets being paved. JR: NOTED 5. No sewer services have been installed on the existing 30-inch sewer that extends through the site. JR: NOTED 6. The water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply. Information on these requirements can be found at: hftp://www.fcgov.com/standards JR: NOTED AND ADDRESSED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington(cDfcgov.com 7. Development fees and water rights will be due at building permit. There may be water and sewer repays due for the water transmission and sewer trunk lines. JR: NOTED Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Glen Schlueter, 970.224.6065, gschlueter(a)fcgov.com 1. 1. Portions of this project are in the Poudre 500-year Moderate Risk Floodplain, and must comply with Chapter 10 of City Code. A Flood Risk Map is attached. JR: NOTED 2. 2. Life, Safety and Emergency Response critical facilities are prohibited within the Poudre River 500-year Floodplain. JR: NOTED 3. 3. Residential development is allowed within the 500-year floodplain without any other Chapter 10 restrictions, however, elevation of structures in the 500-year floodplain is recommended. JR: NOTED 4. 4. The Floodplain Administrator for the Poudre River Floodplain is Marsha Hilmes-Robinson; 970.224.6036, mhilmesrobinson@fcgov.com. Feel free to contact Marsha if you have any questions. 5. 5. A copy of the drainage system improvements that Stormwater thinks has been built was provided at the Conceptual Review meeting. This should be representative of the system in place but there hasn't been a certification of the system submitted which will need to be done prior to reachi%, LLC WILL BE RESPONSIBLE allotted building permits allowed in the Development Agreement. JR: NOTED. RIGDEN FAR FOR THE CERTIFICATION 6. 6. It doesn't appear that the drainage system in general needs any major modifications. However verification that the changes being proposed do not alter the approved plan is needed from the design engineer. Any basin delineations will need to be noted and mitigation of the changes need to be provided. JR: NOTED AND DRAINAGE LETTER HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION 7. 7. There is a note on the plat that the floodplain easement will be vacated at a later date by separate document. Please provide documentation that the easement has been vacated or it needs to be vacated now. JR: NOTED AND EASEMENT VACATION APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED 8. 8. The detailed lot grading will need to be revised because the lot line locations will change with the wider lots being proposed. The biggest issue is on the lots where the alley tract is to be eliminated. That will completely change the drainage concept of the lots on either side of the alley. The alley was serving as one continuous drainage outfall. With its elimination the lots will have to drain out to the adjacent streets. A drainage easement along the back lot lines has to be in a separate tract owned and maintained by the HOA and cannot be on private property. Also not more than three lots can drain to a common swale between homes and an easement must be provided on both sides of downstream lots for the upstream lots to drain beside them. The other option is to change the grading plan so that there is a high point in the rear of the lots and they all drain to the streets in front of them (Type A grading). JR: SEE UTILITY PLANS 9. 9. A SWMP will need to be submitted for approval by the state so please provide a copy of the permit application and documents to the erosion control inspector to review. It should meet present City requirements, however please contact the Erosion Control Inspector, Jesse Schlam at 224-6015 or jschlam@fcgov.com to verify that. JR: RIGDEN FARM, LLC WILL PROVIDE THE PERMIT 10. 10. The city wide Stormwater development fee (PIF) is $6,390.00/acre ($0.1467/sq.ft.) for new impervious area over 350 sq.-ft., and there is a $1,045.00/acre ($0.024/sq.ft.) review fee. No fee is charged for existing impervious area. These fees are to be paid at the time each building permit is Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Glen Schlueter, 970.224.6065, gschlueter fcgov.com issued. Information on fees can be found on the City's web site at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investment-development-fees or contact Jean Pakech at 221- 6375 for questions on fees. There is also an erosion control escrow required before the Development Construction permit is issued. The amount of the escrow is determined by the design engineer, and is based on the site disturbance area or a minimum amount in accordance with the Fort Collins Stormwater Design Criteria. JR: NOTED 11. 11. The design of this site must conform to the drainage basin design of the Foothills Basin Master Drainage Plan as well the City's Design Criteria and Construction standards. JR: NOTED SEE GRADING / DRAINAGE PLANS Department: Park Planning Contact: Craig Foreman, 970-221.6618, cforeman .fcgov.com 1. 1. 8/17/2012: No comments Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224.6143, lex@fcgov.com 1. No comments. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970.221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com 1. Larimer County Road Impact Fees and Street Oversizing Fees are due at the time of building permit. Please contact Matt Baker at 224-6108 if you have any questions. JR: NOTED 2. The City's Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF) is due at the time of submittal. For additional information on these fees, please see: http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/dev-review.php JR: NOTED 3. Under the assumption that lacking public infrastructure is intended to be constructed abutting and adjacent to the proposal, any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. JR: NOTED 4. Please contact the City's Traffic Engineer, Joe Olson (224-6062) to schedule a scoping meeting and determine if a traffic study update is needed for this project. In addition, please contact Transportation Planning for their requirements as well. JR: NOTED 5. Any public improvements must be designed and built in accordance with the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). They are available online at: JR: NOTED SEE UTILITY PLANS http://www.larimer.org/engineering/GMARdStds/UrbanSt.htm 6. City Transportation staff discussed the proposal and specific to lots 226-231, which front William Neal Parkway, staff is not in support of converting these lots to front loaded due to concerns with direct access Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221.6567, mvirata(a)fcgov.com to William Neal Parkway as a collector street in conjunction with the close �r�pximi of the�s�e its o R: EBR DE G P O BITS DIRECT ACCESS Ziegler intersection. These lots will need to remain rear -loaded. TO WILLIAM NEAL PARKWAY 7. The proposal is dependant on the surrounding adjacent infrastructure not already built in Rigden Farm 6th Filing to be built prior to any building permit issuance for the lots in the proposed replat. JR: NOTED 8. This project is responsible for dedicating any right-of-way and easements that are necessary for this project. JR: NOTED 9. Construction plans and/or revisions to existing approved construction plans will be required. JR: NOTED AND SUBMITTED 10. A Development Agreement and/or an amendment to the existing Development Agreement for Rigden Farm 6th Filing is required and will be recorded once the project is finalized with recordation costs paid for by the applicant. JR: NOTED 11. A Development Construction Permit (DCP) will need to be obtained prior to starting any work on the site. JR: NOTED Department: Electric Engineering Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224.6167, rirish(a.fcgov.com 1. Existing electric facilities are stubbed into the site. Any modification or relocation to the existing electric facilities will beat the owners expense. JR: NOTED 2. Electric Capacity fees and Building Site charges will apply. JR: NOTED Current Planning Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-224-6189, slorson(a.fcgov.com 1. This replatting will requires that the project comply with the LMN zoning specifically the section referencing mix of housing types (4.5(D)(2). JR: NOTED SEE HOUSING MIX ANALYSIS STUDY SUBMITTED 2. The proposed replatting is required to be in compliance with the approved PDP and ODP for density, mix of housing types, and garage standards. JR: NOTED SEE ITEM 1 ABOVE 3. The proposed development project is subject to a Type 1 review and public hearing, the decision maker for Type 1 hearings is an Administrative Hearing Officer. The applicant for this development request is not required to hold a neighborhood meeting for a Type 1 hearing, but if you would like to have one to notify your neighbors of the proposal, please let me know and I can help you in setting a date, time and location for a meeting. Neighborhood Meetings are a great way to get public feedback and avoid potential hiccups that may occur later in the review process. JR: NOTED 4. Please see the Development Review Guide at www.fcgov.com/drg. This online guide features a color coded flowchart with comprehensive, easy to read information on each step in the process. This guide includes links to just about every resource you need during development review. JR: NOTED 5. This development proposal will be subject to all applicable standards of the Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC), including Article 3 General Development Standards. The entire LUC is available for your review on the web at http://www.colocode.com/ftcollins/landuse/begin.htm, JR: NOTED 6. If this proposal is unable to satisfy any of the requirements set forth in the LUC, a Modification of Standard Request will need to be submitted with your formal development proposal. Please see Section 2.8.2 of the LUC for more information on criteria to apply for a Modification of Standard. JR: SEE ITEM #1 ABOVE 7. Please see the Submittal Requirements and Checklist at: JR: NOTED http://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/applications.php. 8. The request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Community Development and Neighborhood Services office. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the required documents for the appropriate development review process by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. Also, the required Transportation Development Review Fee must be paid at time of submittal. JR: NOTED 9. When you are ready to submit your formal plans, please make an appointment with Community Development and Neighborhood Services at (970)221-6750. JR: NOTED Rigden Farm 17th Filing May 16, 2013 Plat - The following note needs to be added to the plat. There shall be no private conditions, covenants, or restrictions that prohibit or limit the installation of resource conserving equipment or landscaping that are allowed by Sections 12-120 — 12-122 of the City Code. Sheet 3 — The shared driveways need to be built to match the other shared driveways in the neighborhood — which means that they do not have truncated domes at these driveways. Truncated domes are not provided at residential driveways. The notes regarding the truncated domes need to be removed. Sheet 3 — the 2 notes regarding the driveway type is incorrect. The driveway type would be a type I since the sidewalk in this area is detached. Landscape Plan — you have several notes on the landscape plan regarding requirements or limitations on the driveways so you might want to add the following to the notes as well. Per the Development Agreement for this property the minimum driveway separation is 8 feet. City of F6rt Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview May 17, 2013 Michael Brake 2900 S College Ave Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Rigden Farm Filing Seventeen, PDP130015, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-224-6189, slorson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Please work with staff to schedule an administrative public hearing with a Fort Collins Hearing Officer.JR: COMPLETED Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: The Technical Services and Engineering redlines are ready to be picked up at the "ice cream window" at 281 N. College. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Plat - The plat language is old. The language needs to be updated to our current language. JR: LANGUAGE HAS BEEN UPDATED Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Plat — Plat notes 2 and 3 should be removed as per the discussion at the staff meeting. JR: DONE Page 1 of 8 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Plat — A note needs to be added to the Plat indicating that the Development Agreement in place for Rigden Farm Sixth Filing shall continue to apply to these lots. JR: NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Utility plans — Need to provide station information or distances from property line for the location of the shared driveways. JR: THERE ARE NO SHARED DRIVEWAYS PROPOSED FOR THIS FILING. NOT APPLICABLE. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Utility plans — more detail is needed for how the inlet is going to be constructed just behind the row along the shared driveway. Want to see a slight high point located so that lower flows are contained and enter the inlet and then how is it to be built. JR: SEE DETAIL ON DETAIL SHEET Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Utility plans — Block 2 what is the width and material of the path/ trail that runs across this property? Consistently show the ramps being constructed out to the enhanced cross walks. Some are shown to be built and others are shadowed out. JR: PATH WIDTH HAS BEEN ADDED. RAMPS APPROVED AND TO BE BUILT BY RIDDEN FILING 6 PLANS ARE SHADOWED OUT AND PROPOSED NEW RAMPS TO BE BUILT BY THIS FILING ARE SHOWN AS BOLD. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Utility plans — Per a conversation with Roger Buffington and the inspector — we will want to see stationing on these plans, so that the locations of the services can be determined. JR: STATIONING HAS BEEN ADDED RELATIVE TO SANITARY SEWER STATIONING Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/16/2013 05/16/2013: Record drawings — I think Roger is going to provide some information on what we are going to want to see as for record drawings and we can discuss this more. But overall we will want two mylar sheet sets for the record drawings - One set that will be labeled and included with the 6th Filing plans and one set that will be labeled and included with the 17th filing plans. That way the information will be there regardless of which plan set you go to look for it at in the future. JR: AFTER MEETING WITH ROGER IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT ASBUILTS WILL BE SHOWN ON RIGDEN FILING 6 AND RIGDEN FILING 17 PLANS Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/13/2013: No comments. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 05/15/2013: Comment Originated: 05/13/2013 Comment Originated: 05/15/2013 Page 1 of 8