Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUCKING HORSE FILING TWO - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2014-08-04Fort Collins Current Planning PO Box 580 * Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 * 970.224.6134 - fax DATE: July 26, 2012 TL "jt�' "a o c� TO: Development Review Eng PROJECT PLANNER: Ted SF PDP120022 ,Q �o Please return all comments to 1 the staff rev,,,.. Bucking H PDP August 15, 2012 Note -Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or ACCELA) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other. _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape I Department: Stommerter Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-293Z ischl cgov.co n Topic: Erosion Control C Trent Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/14/2012 11/14/2012: Erosion Control Plan must be included in the Utilities Plan for the signing of the final mylars. Corrrnent Number: 2 Corrrnent Criginated: 11/15/2012 11/1512012: In the Erosion Control Report please address the following: 1) Management of contaminated Soils 2) Loading and Unloading operations 3)Sal Amendments CanTent ent Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/152012 11/15/2012: In the Erosion Control Report: the section on Sediment Traps should be from phase 2-4, not just phase 2, correct? C Timent Number: 4 Corrrnent Originated: 11/15/2012 11/1512012: Please Include the Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Notes on the Erosion Plan, if they are on a different page please include that in the Erosion Control Materials, Comment Number: 5 Comment Criginated: 11/15/2012 11/15//2012: Please see redlines of the Erosion Control Plan If there are any questions or concerns about this please contact me at jschla T) cgov.00m or (970) 218-2932 Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wiamargu cgov.com Topic: General Cornnent Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/12/2012 12/12/2012: The basin where the future apartments are located does not have an outfall due to the extension of Nancy Grey Ave. A solution is needed to drain this area and the backs of the lots in Block 6. Corrnient Number: 7 Corrrnent Originated: 12/12/2012 12/12/2012: There is an area along the "side hill" that has slopes of 3:1. This is greater than the 4:1 madmum. Discussion needs to take place on this matter. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/12I2012 12/12/2012: Please have all drainage easements be labeled as "Public" on the plat. Comment Number: 9 Carment Originated: 12/12/2012 12/12/2012: On sheet G4, the parking lot looked to have flows that would be trapped near the south edge of the northern island. Corrrnerit Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/12/2012 12/12/2012: The working farm and the horse stable need additional permanent BMPs as earlier discussed even if the pond is not used as a horse riding area. Corm it Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/12/2012 12/12/2012: If the detention pond were to be used as a horse riding area in the future, permission from the City would be required, which such area is located within a drainage easement. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icouflbeWccggv.com Topic: Building Bevations Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please remove "Not For Construction" from all plans prior to filing. Topic: Construction Drawings CaTTrent Number: 21 ConTrent Originated: 12JO312012 12JO312012: Please make sure the subtitle matches the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 22 Corrrnent Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: There are several discrepancies betv,.een specific sheets and the sheet index on sheet CS1. Comment Number: 23 C Trnent Originated: 12JO312012 12/03/2012: The right of way of Nancy Gray Avenue continues east to the railroad right of way according to the Subdivision Plat. Rease show this on sheets EM & EX2. Ca-nment Number: 24 Corrrnent Criginated: 12JO312012 12JO312012: There is a lot line for Lot 13, Block 6 on sheets OG1, G1, G3, OU1, U1, U3, SS1, R4, R14, R15, DR1, SV\Wl-SVNVP5, that does not match the Subdivision Rat. Comment Number: 25 C nment Originated: 12JO312012 12/03/2012: There are text over text issues on sheet G3. Co Tnmrit Number: 26 Corrrrrent Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: There are line over text issues on sheet U8, SS4, ST1, R4, R12, R12(Drake Road Turn Lane), XS1, XS2, XS3, XS4. Co-nment Number: 27 Comr>ent Originated: 12/03/2012 12/03/2012: The north arrow for sanitary sewer line E is incorrect on sheet SS5. Comment Number: 28 Can -rent Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: Rease add north arrovus to sheet ST1. Commerrt Number: 29 CorrrTmt Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Rease correct the north arrow on sheet ST2, R5 & R16. CorrrTwt Number: 30 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Rease correct the spelling of striping on sheets R15 & R16. Corrrnxnt Number: 31 Corrrnent Originated: 12/03/2012 12/03/2012: Rease remove the box(viewport?) from around Bucking Haw w on sheet R15. Coinxn t Number: 32 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Rease mask the text on sheet PV1 & PV2. Comment Number: 33 C mTent Criginated: 12/03/2012 12/03/2012: Rease capitalize the letters in the sheet number on sheet SVM\ PS. C Tyne t Number: 34 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12/0312012: Rease correct the title of sheets SVM/P6 & SVMVP7. They are shown as "Detail' sheets, not "Ran" sheets in the sheet index Department: Technical Services C.•.•�"i�il1!�ii[...r�1ii�:1•Lr'.f%lilS:�.{:�:#C•T�?11iii►►;i�•�,�, •. • Topic: Landscape Plans C anent Number: 13 Comrnent aginated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please remove "submittal" from the title on sheet LS001. Cornment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please make sure the legal description matches the Subdivision Plat, and please add "Legal Decsription" above the description. CorT� Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Sheet LP100 shows sheets LP100A & LP10013, which are not in the plan set we reviewed. Should these be included? If not, please remove the reference on this sheet. C mwent Number: 16 Commient Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: There are line over text issues on sheets LP100, LP105, LP402 & LP403. Comment Number: 17 Com7Tient Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please correct the sheet numbers in the key map on all sheets. Com nent Number: 18 C -rTnent Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please bring all darker linework & text in front of lighter linework. Comment Number: 19 Cawent Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please correct the matchline sheet number on sheet LP106. Topic: Plat Cormmt Number: 35 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Please add "A Replat of to the sub -title on all sheets. Comment Number: 36 ComYTient Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: Please correct "Sidehill - Fling Two" in the sub -title on all sheets, in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision, and all other reference to the plat. Comrnent Number: 37 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Please add 'Basis Of Bearings" to note #3 on sheet 1. Cornmient Number: 38 Corrrnent Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: Please renumber the notes on sheet 1. Corrrnerrt Number: 39 Comment Originated: 12JO312012 12JO312012: Please add "maintenance of these Outlots is the Developer's responsibility" to note #8(renumtered). CaTir vnt Number: 40 Comrnent Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Please show the boundary of the plat on the vicinity map. C Ttrent Number: 41 Corrment Originated: 12203/2012 12JO312012: Please provide monument records for the public land comes shown on this plat. Cormat Number: 42 Comr wt Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: Are there any lienholders? If so, please add the Lienholders signature block. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountyoc:aov.com Topic: Plat C Three t Number: 43 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: Please add space for the Notary Public seal under the Owner signature block. Cornrrie7t Number: 44 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Please make sure that all street names are shown and correct on ail sheets. See redlines. Corrrnent Number: 45 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12/03/2012: Please show a key map on all sheets. Comrnent Number: 46 Comment Originated: 12JO312012 1210312012: Please correct the outer boundary lines on all sheets. See redlines. Commim t Number: 47 Comment Originated: 12JO312012 12103/2012: Please check the square footage of Outlot D. CaTrrnerrt Number: 48 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: Please show all bearings & distances curves as recorded on Sidehill -Filing Two, or show as record & measured. See redlines. Corrrnent Number: 49 C m-ent Originated: 12/03/2012 12103✓2012: Please show all missing bearings, distances & curves as marked. See redlines. Corrrnent Number: 50 CaTnent Criginated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Please complete the right of way & easement lines on sheet 2. Comment Number: 51 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: Please increase the size of the text below the street names on all sheets. Comment Number: 52 CaTnient Originated: 12/03/2012 12103/2012: There is cut off text on sheets 3 & 5. C Tnrnient Number: 53 Corrrnent Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Please label the blocks on sheet 4. Corrrnent Number: 54 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12/03/2012: Is there an Access Easement needed for Lot 1, Block 7? C rimet t Number 55 Comrrrnt Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Please make sure that all easements are labeled on all sheets. C nment Number: 56 Comment Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO3/2012: Please add Old Drake Road to sheet 4. Comment Number: 57 C Tnient Originated: 12/03/2012 12/03/2012: Please e)lain the 30 Private Process Easement on sheet 5. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please remove "submitted' from the title on sheet LS001. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icougb6§Lcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Cormient Number: 2 C Tynent Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please make sure the legal description matches the Subdivision Rat, and please add "Legal Decsription" above the description. Corrrnent Number: 3 Cormment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/3012012: There are line over text issues on sheets LS100, LS102, LS103, LS402 & LS403. Commerrt Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Rease correct the sheet numbers in the key map on all sheets. Corrrnent Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: There is a lot line shown for Lot 13, Block 6 that does not match the Subdivision Rat. CorTi rient Number: 6 11/30/2012: Rease bring all darker linevxA & text in front of lighter linewo-k. Comment Number: 7 11/30/2012: Rease label Tract Gan sheet LS102. Corrrnent Number: 8 11/30/2012: There is some text that is too light on sheet LS103. Corrrnent Number: 9 11/30/2012: Rease show that north line of Ourtlot Bon sheets LS103. Comment Number: 10 11/30/2012: Rease label Block 7 on sheet LS103. Corrrnent Number: 11 11/30/2012: Rease show that north line of Outlot Con sheets LS104. Comment Number: 12 11/30/2012: Rease label Tract F on sheet LS401. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanforq@[cgov.com Topic: Constnxtion Drawings Corrnnent Originated: 11/30/2012 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 Carrrnent Originated: 11/30/2012 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 Comment Criginated: 11/30/2012 Comment Number: 2 Corrrnent Originated: 11/30//2012 11/30/2012: S&S plans: Rease revise all speed limit signs to show 25 mph so they don't rnislead whomever creates the signage for installation. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: S&S Rans: Rease include an R1-1 (Stop sign) with a street name sign on the south bound approach on Niles House at Drake. Comment Number: 4 Comment Criginated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: S&S Rans: Rease remove the broken white centerline stripe on all streets. M don't centerline local or minor collectors in residential settings. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanfggt cgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Corrrnent Number: 5 Corrrnent Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: S&S Rans: Please include an R1-1 (Stop sign) on the south bound approach on the Johnson Farm access at Drake. Topic: General Camment Number: 1 Conment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Traffic is ok with the alignment of the Johnson Farm access at Drake. Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 6 Corrrnent Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Rease provide a mean that discusses what was changed in the Fling One and Fling Two TIS's from the August 2012 TIS to the October 2012 TIS. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffingtoriMpgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Continent Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/27/2012 12/11/2012: Include a profile of the 12-inch water rain. 11/27/2012: Include water main extension crossing the railroad. Corrrnerit Number: 11 Corrrnent Originated: 12/11/2012 12/11/2012: Provide additional easement for the sanitary sewer in Tract H. Easement must be 15 feet each side of the sewer (30 feet total width). Corrtrnent Number: 12 Corrrnent Originated: 12/11/2012 12111/2012: Add notes on all new connections to existing sanitary sewer W's (where there are no lines stubbed out) to core drill the openings. Comment Number: 13 CbmTent Originated: 12/11/2012 12111/2012: The water service sizes for the buildings at the Johnson Farm site are all shown as 1'/cinch. These seem large for the buildings shown, and development fees and water rights total nearly $120,000 for each 1'/z-inch service. Contrnent Number: 14 Cormnent Originated: 12/11/2012 12/11/2012: Label size of water service to the working farm. Comrnent Number: 15 Corrrnent Originated: 12/11/2012 12/11/2012: At the east end of Nancy Gray near the railroad, could elliptical pipe be used for the culverts to potentially allow the water main to go over the culverts? Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeal§@LcgpM.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Conment Originated: 11/27/2012 11/27/2012: Rease label the parking stall dimensions and trash enclosures on the site plan. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416.2313, nbeals(dfccKw.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 C,orTrient Originated: 11/27/2012 11/27/2012: The lighting plan is a part of the Final Plan and needs to be induded. I iA To: Capital Project Reviewers From: Russell + Mills Studios 141 S. College Ave., Suite 104 Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524 Re: Jessup Farm Mixed Use Development Conceptual Review Comments Comments from Noah Beals — December 12, 2011 1. Parking requirements have a set max number of spaces allowed for: Industrial .75 space per employee, General retail 4 space per 1000 sq ft Response: Parking requirements have been met 2. Parking lot design requires landscaping islands at every 15 spaces. Parking areas that are less then 100 spaces require at least 10% to be landscaped. Parking areas abutting other uses shall be screened. Response: Parking lot design requirements have been met 3. Trash/Recycling enclosures are required. They need to be on a concrete pad and at least 20 ft away from a public street. Enclosures need to have walk in access that does not require entering the main service gate. Also see this link for design standards for enclosures Response: Trash enclosures have been shown 4. Bicycle parking is required at 5% of the vehicle parking spaces. Bike parking in excess of this standard is encouraged. Response: Bicycle parking is now approximately equal to 15% of vehicle parking S. The garden shall be an accessory use and not a primary use. Response: Noted Comments from Roger Buffington — December 12, 2011 1. The existing City water/sewer facilities in this area include a 24-inch water main in Timberline and water and sewer mains in the Sidehill development to the south. In addition, there is a 30-inch sewer at the very north tip of the site which crosses under the railroad. Response: Water and sewer connections are proposed to the referenced facilities. 2. There is no record of City water or sewer service to the proposed site; therefore, it is assumed the farmstead used a well for water service and a septic system for wastewater treatment. Response: New water and sewer services will be provided and connected to the City mains. 3. At present, the water and sewer mains in Sidehill are approximately 400 feet to the south of this property. These mains must be extended north in accordance with the Sidehill utility plans. Response: The "Bucking Horse Townhomes" and "Bucking Horse Residences" projects will bring the referenced infrastructure to the southern boundary of the Jessup Farm Artisan Village. Said improvements will be per the previously approved Utility Plans for Sidehill — Filing Two. 4. A water main must be looped through the site from the main extensions in Sidehill to the 24-inch main in Timberline. Response: A looped water main is proposed. S. In order to serve the buildings on the north part of the site, it will likely require connection to the 30-inch sewer at the north tip of the site. Response: A connection to the 30-inch sewer is proposed. 6. If there are any restaurants included in the project, grease interceptors will be required. Response: A grease trap will be provided with the farm -to -fork restaurant to be established in the old farmhouse. 7. The water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply. Response: Acknowledged 8. Development fees and water rights will be due at building permit. Response: Acknowledged Comments from Glen Schlueter — December 12, 2011 1. This site was included in the drainage study for the Sidehill development. The study assigns a runoff coefficient of 0.25 to the site which is usually used for sites with no existing impervious area; however, there are a number of buildings on the site that could be grandfathered. An exhibit would need to be prepared to document the existing impervious areas since both the design and fee requirements are based on new impervious area. If all buildings are removed and the site is a totally scraped as appears to be the case, there is no grandfathering of impervious area. Response: The 0.25 runoff coefficient and resulting peak runoff rate previously assumed has been utilized as the maximum allowable discharge from the property. The actual percent imperviousness proposed exceeds that which was previously assumed; therefore, on -site detention and water quality treatment will be provided to mitigate the difference. 2. When there is an increase in impervious area greater than 1000 square feet, a drainage and erosion control report and construction plans are required and must be prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in Colorado. Response: Acknowledged 3. If there is an increase in impervious area greater than 1000 square feet, onsite detention is required with a 2 year historic release rate for water quantity. Response: See response to #1 above. 4. Portions of this site drain into three different major drainage basins: Poudre River, Spring Creek and Foothills basins. The purple line on the topography exhibit provided divides the site. The southern portion drains into the Foothills basin where the Sidehill development has provided an outfall. The design engineer needs to consider both the inflow rate and increase in volume that would be added to the detention pond on the Sidehill site or to provide onsite detention. The drainage outfall for the site is a channel and concrete pan along the railroad (east side of Sidehill). The northern portion of the site drains to the Poudre River basin according to the major masterplan basin delineation, but in reality, some of it drains to Spring Creek. As a result, the area north of the Foothills basin boundary line will require additional analysis if additional impervious area in excess of 1000 square feet is added in that portion of the site. Response: See Preliminary Drainage Letter and Exhibit. This can be further explored, if necessary, during the Final Plan phase. S. Water quality treatment will be required as described in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 3 - Best Management Practices (BMPs). Water quality treatment is provided in the detention pond for Sidehill; therefore, the design engineer has the option to use the Sidehill pond for treatment. This would require an evaluation of the water quality capture volume increase and possible outlet modifications. In the other basins separate water quality treatment is required. Response: See response to #1 above. 6. The design of this site must conform to the drainage basin design of the Foothills, Poudre River, and Spring Creek Master Drainage Plans, as well the City's Design Criteria and Construction standards. Response: Acknowledged 7. The Stormwater development fee (PIF) is $6,313.00/acre ($0.1449/sq.ft.) for new impervious area over 350 sq.-ft., and there is a $1,045.00/acre ($0.024/sq.ft.) review fee. No fee is charged for existing impervious area. These fees are to be paid at the time each building permit is issued. Information on fees can be found on the City's web site. There is also an erosion control escrow required before the Development Construction permit is issued. The amount of the escrow is determined by the design engineer, and is based on the site disturbance area or erosion control measures shown on the site construction plans. Response: Acknowledged Comments from Karen McWilliams — December 12, 2011 1. The buildings and site features on this property have has been reviewed previously, and found to be individually eligible for Landmark designation. Response: Acknowledged 2. Alterations to the buildings and the site will need to be reviewed under the City's Demolition/Alteration Review Process, City Code Section 14-72, which applies to any buildings or structures 50+ years old that are determined to be individually eligible for Landmark designation. Response: Acknowledged 3. The project will also be reviewed for compliance with LUC Section 3.4.7. Section 3.4.7. is intended to ensure that, to the maximum extent feasible: (1) historic sites, structures or objects are preserved and incorporated into the proposed development and any undertaking that may potentially alter the characteristics of the historic property is done in a way that does not adversely affect the integrity of the historic property; and (2) new construction is designed to respect the historic character of the site and any historic properties in the surrounding neighborhood. City of F6rt Collins �Cur�rent Planning PO Box 580 * Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 * 970.224.6134 - fax DATE: July 26, 2012 TO: Pavement Mgmt. PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard PROJECT COMMENT SHEET PDP120022 Bucking Horse Second Filing PDP - Type II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: August 15, 2012 Note -Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems © Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or ACCELA) 9A�(vl so ik t w. yDr 6 TLx1M Lr 're ir.2"-AA'C'.'4 o ✓) . Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other. _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Response: Acknowledged 4. Properties that are, or become, designated as Fort Collins Landmarks, and/or on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, qualify for financial incentives, for both interior and exterior work. These include $15,000 Historic Structure Assessment grants, State Historic Fund grants of $300,000 and more, both 20% State and 20% Federal Tax Credits, and City no interest loans of up to $7,500 each year. Response: Acknowledged S. The applicants are scheduled to present their plans to the Landmark Preservation Commission at its December 14, 2011 meeting. Additionally, Historic Preservation staff and the Landmark Preservation Commission are always available for project complementary reviews. Response: Acknowledged 6. There is concern about the four single family homes being proposed at the projects' sw corner; and the character/height of the proposed housing, both on the site and across Blackbird Drive and along the "wine cave." When the I zone was established as the appropriate zoning for this parcel, it was stipulated that there would be no new housing on the site (only the historic). The current plan shows homes along both sides of Blackbird Drive. Historic Preservation staff could see allowing the housing farther to the east, but additional discussion will need to occur. Please contact Karen McWilliams. Response: The plan now shows a daycare facility at the SW corner of the site. 7. The applicant presented the conceptual plan to the L.P.C. on Wednesday, December 14, 2011. In general, the L.P.C. provided positive comments and supported the adaptive re -use of the structures that are eligible for local historic designation. The Commission indicated that main house should be visible from Timberline Road and not obscured by new buildings or dense landscaping. In addition, the central parking lot should be mitigated with landscaping so it does not detract from the main house. Response: Acknowledged Comments from Ron Gonzales — December 12, 2011 1. Building addresses are required to be visible from the street on which they front. Minimum size is 6 inches posted on a contrasting background. Response: Acknowledged 2. The two large industrial buildings are required to be fire sprinklered. Response: Acknowledged 3. The water supply for this project calls for a fire hydrant to be within 300 feet of all commercial buildings, and to deliver 1500 gpm at 20 psi; for the residential portion, hydrants shall be spaced within 400 feet and deliver 1000 gpm at 20 psi. Response: See Utility Plans 4. If the occupant load of the restaurant exceeds 99 it shall be required to be fire sprinklered. Please provide the occupant load calculations for this building. If the occupant load exceeds 49, two exits are required with panic hardware. If the occupant load exceeds 100, emergency lighting will be required. All exits shall lead to a public way. Response: Acknowledged S. A hood/duct fire protection system is required under the kitchen hood. Response: Acknowledged 6. Fire lanes will be required for emergency access. they will be shown on the plat as Emergency Access Easements. The minimum width is 20 feet and clear air space of 14 feet. The tree canopy line shall not encroach into the fire lane. The fire lane(s) shall be flat, level, support 40 ton and shall be maintained unobstructed. They shall be made visible by painting or signage. Response: This will be added to the final plat drawing 7. If any commercial building exceeds 5000 square feet, it shall be fire contained, as defined in the local amendment to the IBC, or it shall be fire sprinklered. Response: Acknowledged Comments from Lindsay Ex — December 12, 2011 1. The applicant should make note of Article 3.2.1(C) that requires developments to submit plans that "...(4) protects significant trees, natural systems, and habitat". Note that a significant tree is defined as a tree having DBH (Diameter at Breast Height) of six inches or more. If any trees on site have a DBH of greater than six inches, a review of the trees shall be conducted with Tim Buchanan, City Forester (221-6361) to determine the status of the existing trees and any mitigation requirements as the result of development impacts. Response: All trees have been reviewed with Tim Buchanan and Ralph Zentz — see tree protection and mitigation plan. Also please reference the tree report from Jordan's Tree Moving and Maintenance. 2. In addition the significant tree requirement outlined in Article 3.2.1, the trees on the northern portion of the property have been mapped as "Non-native upland forest", which does not have specific protection standards within the Land Use Code. However, if there are any significant trees within this patch of forest, let's do our best to protect them. Response: See response from comment 1 above. 3. The City's green building program has many programs that may benefit your project. Resources are available at the Green Building web page: http://www.fcgov.com/greenbuilding/. Of particular interest may be the Integrated Design Assistance Program, which offers financial incentives and free technical support to those interested in delivering high-performance buildings that exceed building code requirements for energy performance. Gary Schroeder (970-221-6395) is the contact person for this program. Response: Acknowledged 4. With respect to landscaping and design, the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code, in Article 3.2.1 (E)(2)(3), requires that you use native plants and grasses in your landscaping or re -landscaping and reduce bluegrass lawns as much as possible. Response: Acknowledged Comments from Sheri Langenberger — December 12, 2011 1. Larimer County Road Impact Fees and Street Oversizing Fees are due at the time of building permit. Please contact Matt Baker at 224-6108 if you have any questions. Response: Acknowledged 2. The City's Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF) is due at the time of submittal. For additional information on these fees, please see: http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/dev-review.php Response: Acknowledged 3. Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Response: Acknowledged 4. Please contact the City's Traffic Engineer, Joe Olson (224-6062) to schedule a scoping meeting for the traffic study needed for this project. In addition, please contact Transportation Planning for their requirements as well. Response: Matt Delich had a scoping meeting with Traffic Engineering. 5. Any public improvements must be designed and built in accordance with the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). Response: Acknowledged 6. This project is responsible for dedicating any right-of-way and easements that are necessary for this project. Response: Acknowledged 7. Comments on the new access point onto Timberline Road: A r-in r-out access at the north end of Outlot C of Sidehill 2nd Filing maybe possible, but before any decision can be made additional information on the use of the site, traffic study information, and verification that it can work and be designed correctly. If an access is agreed to the ODP will need to be amended as that document does not show an access point from this parcel out to Timberline Road. Concerns and items that will need addressed regarding the review of an access point at this location are: Volume and type of vehicles using this access. If a decel lane is needed this will be hard to implement. A lot of work went into preserving the trees that are along the frontage of this property. Location. Where is this access point in relation to the inlets and the parkway grade changes that occur? Sight Distance. Does the hill and/ or grade change in the parkway pose a sight distance problem? Will an access even a r-in r-out meet sight distance requirements? This stretch of road is currently on the list for completion of the west side of the road and the median. It is tentatively scheduled for 2014. Design work for this has not yet been started. If an access is approved and this project occurs before the City project is built this project will be responsible for the design and construction of the median extension needed to control the traffic movements. We will be looking for the design of the access point to meet standards and accommodate the largest size vehicles anticipated utilizing the access. Response: See Utility Plans, TIS, and variance requested therein. 8. Blackbird Drive and Blue Yonder Way are not yet constructed and the approval for them has expired. This project will need to provide the design for these streets and construct them with this project. Response: The "Bucking Horse Townhomes" and "Bucking Horse Residences" projects will construct the referenced streets to the southern boundary of the Jessup Farm Artisan Village. Said improvements will be per the design previously approved Utility Plans for Sidehill — Filing Two, but will be re -submitted for current review and approval. 9. As proposed with the adjacent development plan expired and not built, the single-family lots would exceed that allowed for a single point of access. What this means is that the lots along Blue Yonder Way cannot be built until the adjacent development occurs and additional street connections are made. This also means that a temporary turn around will be needed at the intersection of Blackbird Drive and Blue Yonder Way with this proposal. Response: See response to #8, above. 10. Off -site connections as needed to serve this site with utilities are this projects responsibility to design and construct. Response: See response to #8, above. 11. Any grading on or impact to the RR property will require the RR signature on the plans. Response: There is no grading proposed within the RR property. 12. Utility plans will be required and a Development Agreement will be recorded once the project is finalized. Response: Acknowledged 13. A Development Construction Permit (DCP) will need to be obtained prior to starting any work on the site. Response: Acknowledged Comments from Ted Shepard — December 12, 2011 1. This parcel was previously brought to Conceptual Review on August 3, 2009. A copy of those comments can be provided for your reference. As stated in the 2009 Comment Letter, 1. The site is zoned I, Industrial. It is identified as Outlot C of Sidehill Second Filing and referred to as the Jessup Farm. It is contained within the Johnson Property Overall Development Plan, approved in February of 2002 with an amendment in 2003. It was not included in the Sidehill Project Development Plan, and therefore a new PDP is required. According to the O.D.P.: "The Jessup Farm will be maintained as a rural character limited use parcel. Final specific conditions and covenants will be determined at the time of a specific site plan. Uses will be limited to the following permitted uses in the Industrial zone: 1. Offices, financial services and clinics; 2. Mixed -use dwellings; 3. Artisan/photography and gallery/studio; 4. Plant nurseries; 5. Veterinary facilities and small animal clinics; 6. Bed and breakfast; 7. Child care center; 8. Equipment rental without outdoor storage; 9. Recreational uses. Response: Acknowledged 2. The proposed uses are described as Single Family Detached, Retail, Standard Restaurant and Light Industrial. (Note the gardens can be considered an Accessory Use as it will be in conjunction with the Standard Restaurant.) Since these uses are not listed on the approved O.D.P., an Amended O.D.P. will be required. Response: Please reference the Bucking Horse ODP Major Amendment for all additional permitted uses 3. The proposed Light Industrial (Type One) and Standard Restaurant (Type Two) are permitted uses in the Industrial zone. Single Family Detached and Retail are not permitted and would require the project to go through the Addition of Permitted Uses process in order to be allowed. The Addition of a Permitted Use process must be accompanied by an O.D.P., P.D.P., Final Plan or an Amendment to any of the foregoing. In this case, a request to amend the O.D.P. along with the request for the Addition of Permitted Uses would seem like the logical approach. Response: Acknowledged 4. 4. A neighborhood information meeting would be required. Response: Acknowledged S. The Plan does a very good job of buffering the Single Family Detached from the Retail and Industrial. Also, there appears to be generous buffering along Timberline Road. Be sure to coordinate the amount of buffering along Timberline with Engineering so that the proper amount of major arterial right-of-way can be provided and buffering remain effective. Response: Acknowledged 6. 6. Have you considered a duplex or tri-plex or single family attached dwellings at the corner of Timberline and Blackbird? Or, perhaps contact one of the social service agencies to explore the possibility of a group home at this corner. Since Timberline is a heavily traveled arterial, the immediate corner may not be the most attractive location for a single family detached home. Response: A daycare facility is now proposed at the SW corner of the site. 7. The proposed addition of permitted use is subject to Section 1.3.4 Addition of Permitted Uses, of the LUC. The proposed use is subject to a Type 2 (Planning and Zoning Board) review and public hearing. The applicant for this development request will be required to hold a neighborhood information meeting prior to formal submittal of the project. Type 2 development proposals are subject to the neighborhood meeting requirement, per Section 2.2.2 of the LUC. Please contact me at 221-6750, to assist you in setting a date, time, and location for a meeting. A planner and possibly other City staff, would be present to facilitate the meeting. Response: Acknowledged 8. Please see the Development Review Guide at www.fcgov.com/drg. This online guide features a color coded flowchart with comprehensive, easy to read information on each step in the process. This guide includes links to just about every resource you need during development review. Response: Acknowledged 9. This development proposal will be subject to all applicable standards of the Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC), including Article 3 General Development Standards. Response: Acknowledged 10. If this proposal is unable to satisfy any of the requirements set forth in the LUC, a Modification of Standard Request will need to be submitted with your formal development proposal. Please see Section 2.8.2 of the LUC for more information on criteria to apply for a Modification of Standard. Response: Acknowledged 11. Please see the Submittal Requirements and Checklist at: http://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/appiications.php. Response: Acknowledged 12. The request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Community Development and Neighborhood Services office. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the required documents for the appropriate development review process by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. Also, the required Transportation Development Review Fee must be paid at time of submittal. Response: Acknowledged 13. When you are ready to submit your formal plans, please make an appointment with Community Development and Neighborhood Services at (970 )221-6750. Response: Acknowledged City of Flirt Coltins ilrttw. Paul Mlis Russell + Mlls Studios 141 S. College Ave. Ste 104 Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Bucking Horse Filing Two, FDP120018, Round Number 1 Connxmity Development and Neighborhood services 281 North Cailege, Avenue Fo Box 5BO Fort Collins, CO 8(`i22 970.221.6750 970.224, 6134 - fax fq )v.czar✓cat+ Jcpfrrxntrevic;w Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual comnnenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard(gcgov.com. Cornmerit Sumrary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshe cgLxLggm Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: The plat would be easier to read if all of the blocks were identified on all sheets and in larger font and / or heavier line than that of the lot numbers. Please add Block 6 to sheet three. Please add Blocks 2, 3 and 4 to sheet four. Please add Blocks 4 and 5 to sheet 5. Conrrerrt Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: The plat needs to be consistent with the Site Plan which establishes the Cluster Development Plan which requires that 500/oof the Cluster Plan be reserved as open space in accordance with the Land Use Code. Please add a note that states that Outlot B and Tracts D and F shall remain as open space per the Ouster Development Design Standard of Section 4.2(E)(2)(b) of the City of Fort Cdlins Land Use Code. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: The mandated 25-foot rear setback for Lots 13,14 and 15, Block Two is acceptable. For Lot 1, Block Five, however, this lot exceeds one-half acre which is the minimum lot size in the L1 E zone even if there were no Cluster Plan. And, 25 feet is already the minimum rear yard for such lots per Section 4.2(D)(2)(c). Consequently, the minimum rear yard for this lot needs to be increased to 50 feet to exceed the standard and provide a setback that is proportional to the lot size. Coimnent Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: On Site Plan note number 23, be sure to clarify that plat refers to "Cutlot" B, not a "Tract." Department: Current Planning Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepardCOcgov.cx�m Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please add a note that any lot fronting on VValkaloosa Way shall be prohibited from taking any vehicular aooess onto Niles House Avenue. This note should be repeated on the applicable plan sheets as well for emphasis. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Mat about manure managemerrl for the hale stable? VUII there be a separate manure bin as Wth the working farm? Corrinent Number: 7 CorTn-ent Originated: 12/03/2012 11/30/2012: The V\k*ng Farm Manaure Managermt Plan should be referenced. We will treat this document like a Transportation Impact Study. Please remove the Draft watem-ark. Also, the Plan indicates both manure managment and composting. It is unclear whether or not composting will take place onsite or if manure will be hauled off -site for composting. The Plan mentions maximum height of pile, roofing, gutters, downspouts, 2-4%gradient, filter stop and landscaping. These details should be prescribed on the final documents so there is a clear expectation as to how this activity will be conducted. Comment Number: Carrmnt Originated: 12/03/2012 12JO312012: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: AndrewGingerich, 970-221-6W3, agingenchCcilcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings ConTrient Number: 10 Camrent Originated: 11/27/2012 12/11/2012: Extend sidewalk connection into right of Way 30' and end adjacent to Environmental Drive. 11/27/2012: Sheet 0G1:Provide connections from the proposed trail to Environmental Drive to be to connect to future sidwalk along drake/envir. Drive. Provide a handicap ramp on the east end of the trail that coincides with the ramp on the south side of C environmental dove. Corrrnent Number: 11 CaTirrient Originated: 11/27/2012 12/11/2012: Label the Barricade or provide a symbol. 11/27/2012: Sheet OG1: On the east side of Niles House Avenue and Drake Road intersection, provide a barricade at the end of the sidewalk that will in the future extend down Drake Road to the east. Sidewalk is currently being shown on these plans for portions of Drake Read and Environmental Drive adjacent to the Rgden Fame Fling Six that does not exist and does not need to be built as a part of these plans. Rease remove. C Timent Number: 12 ComrTmt Criginated: 11/27/2012 /211/2012: This sidewalk is still being shown on the plans. Is it the intent to constnact this? If not, remove the linework and provide a barricade at Niles House Avenue. 11/27/2012: Sheet G2: Sidewalk Northeast of Nileshouse adjacent to Cutlot A will not be constructed with this filing according to response to comrnents, please remove from plans and add barricade. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: AndrewGingerich, 970-221-M3, agingeHchCcr�'cgcw.com Topic: Construction Drawings Contrient Number: 24 Comment Originated: 11/27/2012 12/11/2012: Does CO indicate Clean Out on this sheet? This should be labeled as such. 11/27/2012: Sheet UD1: Please revise notes per the redlines to modify this sheet to serve as the Valley Well Underdrain P&P. Callout the underdrain pipe and type (perforated/slotted?) Corrrnent Number: 28 Comment Originated: 11/27/2012 11/27/2012: Sheet F E: It is the developer's responsibility to build as much of the roadway as possible and as dose to the Railroad Right of Way that is allowed including the storm pipes. Portions that are not constructed per these ans will be collected in the form of t in (� PaY� SZ �� lieu. Comnrm t Number. 31 Comment Originated: 11/27/2012 / 12/11/2012: As per email sent to Nick Haws on 12/11/2012, please provide intersection detail, concretejointing plan and modify demolition and repave limits according to e)osting concrete(` I panels and joints. Provide stationing of start and end of concrete slope paving between , sidevualk and back of curb and gutter. Slopes for concrete slope paving look acceptable as proposed. 11/27/2012: Drake Left Turn Lane - Please refer to email sent to applicant and consultants on 11/21/2012 for oorrrnents regarding the tum lane. In addition to the email engineering would like to see flowiine grade greater than or equal to 0.4% achieved. Please revise or provide additional information as to why 0.4%can not be achieved. Carry profile around curb return at Timberline Road. Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 12/11/2012 1211112012: CS1- Change 20' Concrete Alley to Concrete Private Drive Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 12J11/2012 12/11/2012: Sheet G& 10' trail should intersect the sidewalk perpendicularly for at least 29 behind the floWine. This will help prevent vehicles or machinery accessing the driveway cut to cut the comers. C Tffrent Number: 48 Comment Originated: 12/11/2012 12/11/2012: Sheet R6: Provide an interim grading line in the profile that shovvs hove the end of the proposed road ties into the e)asting grade without disrupting the railroad right of way. Label and dimension the rail road right of way. Comment Number: 49 Comment Originated: 12/11/2012 12111/2012: Two (2) R13 sheets were provided and the set seems to be missing R14 which included Cul de Sac and Nancy Gray Median details. TeAmask issues with slopes on R13. Comrnerrt Number: 50 Commment Originated: 12/11/2012 12/11/2012: Sheet D1: Should an underdran deanout detail be included on this sheet to coincide Wth the Valley Wall Underdrain detail? Topic: General Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: AndrewGingerich, 970-221-6603, agingench(ccfcgov.ccxn Topic: General Comment Number: 44 W 0� 5)e Comment Originated: 11/28/2012 12111/2012: Traffic does not have concern with the alignment of Johnson Farm at Drake and Rgden Parkway. 11/28/2012: The alignment of Rgden Parkway and the acccess to the Johnson Farm Office Complex still needs to be discussed. Applicant's response to comments from PDP stated it was an existing curb cut. However with redevelopment if there is a safer or more functional alignment than what is existing it needs to be evaluated. Transportation staff will meet this week to discuss this alignment. Comment Number: 51 Comment Originated: 12/11/2012 12111/2012: SOP Exhibit and Erosion Control Escrow dollar amount need to be provided for finalization of the development agreement. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/27/2012 12/11/2012: This still has not been addressed. Public access needs to be provided from the right of way to the lot line. 11/27/2012: Lot 1, Block 7 needs to have public access off of Drake -0*60 Road. This can be achieved by adding an easement or extending the lot line to the Right of Way and thus the blanket easement. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/27/2012 12/11/2012: This still needs to be discussed. Parks and Recreation will reimburse for a portion of the trail that exists on the Future City Park Tract. However, public access will need to be vi provided to and from this portion of the trail. 11/27/2012: Many of the trails through the project C exist within Tracts and Our lots that spe* "private access". Can the access portion be changedto public or at language is modified i pu maybe pl ang age n a way to allow the public access to Q.+ these trails. Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangpnbqM@pffcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 11/O6/2012: $2,387.12 is still owed for PDP fees. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lexg cgcw.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 .c-s - 1v-(.-_ Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Based on today's meeting, there will be two different areas addressed in the plan set, the DA, and the Mitigation and Monitoring Plans. These two areas will include the "Nancy Gray Watland" and the "Native Upland Habitat Areas." The Nancy Gray wetland will be designed as a wetland and will have corresponding success criteria, e.g., a wetland -soil -moisture regime. Altematively, the Native Upland Habitat Area will be designed for rrix of predominately upland species with other moisture tolerant species, as outlined in Seed Mixes B and C proposed. Department: Environmental Planning C .•"iF7ME iT:MIm`Walr'y-oZr.-iE,%IE 't�.i «. • Topic: General Corrrnent Number: 2 C mTient Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please add references to the Nancy Gray V\Ietland and the Native Upland Habitat Areas onto the site, landscape, and utility plans. Please also add a note on the grading plan, e.g., sheet G3 regarding the creation of rricrotopography in the Nancy Gray wetland area. A note should be added to the site, landscape, and utility plan regarding HOA maintenance and on the landscape plan, the intended uses of the wetland and bioswale areas. Comrnent Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: As I indicated in the emails we exchanged, a mitigation and monitoring plan will need to be developed to indicate how the wetlands will be installed and monitored to ensure success. This document wi11 be attached to the development agreement. A letter of credit to ensure the wetlands can be replaoed will be required. As indicated during the 11/30/12 meeting, Cedar Creek Associates will prepare a mitigation estimate for what it would cost to recreate the Nancy Gray wetland, should the success criteria not be met. Based on our meeting on 11/30/12, 1 can also begin to worts on DA language. Once the Development Argreernent is finalized, we can release the security provided as a part of the Buckinghcrse Fling No. One. CornmDnt Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/3012012: 1 can confirm receipt of the Awry Corps of Engineers determination that the wetlands on the project site were not jurisdictional. I received a copy of this letter on November 5, 2012. Coimrieit Number: 5 Con7nent Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Please revise the seed mix for the Nancy Gray wetland area in coordination with Cedar Creek. Comrrnent Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: A signature line will need to be added for the Environmental Ranner on all of the Utility Rans. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Rease add a reference on the landscape plans regarding the transplanting of existing wetland material (soil and plant material) to the Nancy Gray wetland and to other areas on the site as available. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Rease add a reference to the monitoring plan on the Nancy Gray wetland or as a general note on the landscape and utility plans. C Timent Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: A note should be added to the landscape plan regarding the seed mixes proposed, that they may change based on what species respond best. All seed rrix changes shall be approved by the City's Environmental Ranner. Comment Number: 10 Comrnent Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: Rease provide me with the area of the Nancy Gray wetland and the Upland Native Habitat Areas. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex(aftov.rom Topic: General CoTnvt Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012 11/30/2012: These notes reflect the information I reviewed and \Ae discussed during the 11/30/12 meeting. Additional comments may arise based on the monitoring plan and revisions to be submitted on 12/7/12. Departmnt: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(4cgay.com Topic: Landscape Plans Commit Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 1. Please add this tree protection note on Sheets LP101 and Lp102. • Tree pruning and removal shall be perfom-ed City of Fort Collins licensed arborist as required by code. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 2. Please specify Honeylocust as Skyline Honey locust in the plant schedule. Corrrment Number: 3 C.onrnent Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 3. Please review pa -way area just to the vest of entrance off of Drake to Building 1 for additions of street trees. Corrrnent Number: 4 Corrrnent Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 4. On Sheet LP106 Redmond Linden is shown in the open space area. Lindens tend to require more irrigation so the applicant may Wsh to use a lover water use tree. Bur Oak or wavy leaf oak night be good species to consider for lavicer water use. Corrrmer t Number: 5 Corm-nent Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 5. Could a larger symbol be used for Cologreen and Skyrocket Juniper to aid in reading the blue prints. Symbol size is similar to those for shrubs. Comment Number: 6 Corrrnent Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 6. Please add a general note that says Trees shall be B&B or equivalent. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(acgay.com Topic: Landscape Plans C Tnu t Number: 7 C.ormient Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 7. Pawnee Buttes sand cherry is low and horizontal. VUbuld it be better in the open space areas where this plant is shown for use to speafy the taller standard Sand Cherry? Conyient Number: 8 Camlent Originated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 8. The Insanti dogwood is a rnoderate water use plant. For use in the dryer open space areas these are some additional xeric shrubs to consider for use that night perform better under lower water applications: 1) Apache Plume (Failugia paradoxa); 2) CAen's Buffalo Currant (Ribes aurum'Gwen's Buffao'); 3) Crandall Clove Currant (lives odoratum'Crandall') COCTnxTt Number: 9 Comment Criginated: 11/28/2012 11/28/2012: 9. Symbols for the shrubs in the key on LP002 are fairly small. Could they be made a little larger to help in reading the plans? Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-615Z dmartine a�"cgov.com Topic: General Corrrnent Number: 1 Cormhent Originated: 11/09/2012 11/09/2012: The existing sewer mains at Nancy Gray & Niles House Ave. were originally installed for a round -a -bout intersection. Changing the intersection to a traditional one may result in the sever lines preventing the installation of the power lines. This issue will need to be discussed with Roger Buffington in the WaterAVastewater engineering division. Relocation of the sever lines may be necessary. Cornrnent Number: 2 ConTrreht Criginated: 11/09/2012 11/09/2012: A copy of the landscape plan showing planned streetlights was sent to the landscape architect on 11-9-12. Street tree locations will need to be adjusted to provide a minimum of 40 feet clearance between trees and streetlight standards (15 feet for omamental type trees). Department: Park Planning Contact: Craig Foreman, 970-221-6618, cforeman afcgov.com Topic: General C nment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/022012 11/02/2012: We continue to work with the developer for the purchase of neighborhood park site in this development.