The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR CENTER NOVEMBER 2006 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2011-11-29■ REVISION City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: April 3, 2006 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Cameron Gloss \&� #7-06 Rocky Mountain Raptor Program ODP & First first Filing PDP — Type II SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: April 5, 2006 Note -_Please identify your redlines for fut_ ure reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) ivume (pteaseprino CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape A1110MEM, t" City of Fort Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins MICKEY WILLIS PARADIGM REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPMENT Date: 03/30/2006 2969 SPRING HARVEST LANE FORT COLLINS, CO 80528 Mickey, Staff has reviewed your submittal for ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM ODP AND FIRST FILING PDP, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan DeLaughter Topic: General Number. 8 3/21/2006 13/21/061 Scanability is an issue on both the PDP and ODP. Created: The grayscale and diagonal line patterns should be removed. Response — Grayscale Topic: ODP has been removed Number. 6 [3/21/061 Please show how the site meets Section 3.6Created: 3/21/2006 odeor address this standard. Currently, no proposed street connectio sea a shown. Land UseCf all, parcels are included in the ODP, provision of future access should be considered for each parcel, with special consideration given to connections to the existing street network (Main St., Martinez St.). Per our meeting on 3/22/06, the ODP should seek a modification to the LUC standard, and the PDP should show appropriate connections. or access is allowed for these remises. v v�� "` ca es and no Number. 7 13/21/061 A vicinity map must be included on the ODP. Created: 3/21/2006 Response — we included a vicinity man 24" x 36" with the ODP annhcation on the ODP map. Topic: PDP Number. 9 13/21/061 See redlines for additional comments. Created: 3/21/2006 Response — the Number: 11 [3/21/06] What is the bounds of the PDP? Created: 3/21/2006 boundary Only a portion of parcel B is shown. Page I Per the 3/22/06 meeting, it is recommended that the boundary of the PDP be reduced to include only the area needed to serve the temporary cages. Cage locations must be coordinated with other departments (stormwater, natural resources . Res onse- we have mnmfiari #h. o�� _. ) a reed to their reouirema """"""Q`C' sian on 41'0 5 walked the ►its for cage Inratinng Number. 16 [3/21/06) Label and dimension any Right of Way and ea em ntsf21/2006 Response- agree Department: Light & power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Utility Number. 2 13/10/061 If any new or additional electric service is required, contact Light & Per Engineering (221-6700) to coordinate el Response -agree ectric facilities and charges. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carte Dann Topic: Fire Number 24 [3/27/06] ACCESS: A fire lane shall be required for this site. Contact the PFA Fire Prevention Bureau for the construction details of the fire lane. Resnnncc- - fi— i.--- the fire goes out www timbersil com Number. 26 Created: 3/27/2006 [3/27/061 ADDRESS: The address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property. They shall be posted on a contrasting background, and a minimum of 6 inches high. Property along Vine Drive and at the Main -Street entrance pumper that we can ost on tt Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Eric Bracke Topic. Traffic Number. 1 3/2o[3/9/06] The Transportation Impact Study for this project rhasebeen waived due to minimal peak hour trips being generated. The project also has a capacity reservation on file with the Department pertaining to the intersection of Vine/Lemay Response- Thank You very much! Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Drainage Number. 19 Created: 3/21/2006 [3/21/061 Please add a note to the plans that a drainage report will be submitted for any future development plans for a more permanent facility. Response- agreed►► Page 2 Please address how off -site flows are being routed through the site if any and where the Proposed outfall for this site will be. -- feet. Topic: Floodp/ain Number. 20 [3/21/08j F000dplain comments Created: 3/21/2008 1. Please also show the City's 0.5 foot floodway on the site plan. It is slightly wider than the FEMA 1 ft. floodway. Even with the Dry Creek Diversion project completed, the floodway will still go through this area. It appears that the flight cage building and the fence may be in the 0.5 ft. floodway. If so; the cage will need to be moved out of the floodway or shown to not cause a rise in the 100-year flood elevation. The fence will either have to be moved or be a break -away design. 2. Please provide a detailed grading plan. Depending on which berms are removed and how the grading takes place, it may result in the fl further across this property. This will need to be plaannedyfor if youand wanttoplainpm nidi�n� izeo� changes to the floodway so that it will not impact your site as you plan future work. Response No floodwav wiii he _ .- 2. A floodplain use permit will be required. The permit fee is $25. Response- agree 3. Any remodel work done to the former Platte Valley Lumber building will be subject to the substantial improvement policy. If improvements exceed 50% of the structures value (excluding land) then the structure must be elevated or floodproofed 18" above the floodplain. If the improvement value is below the 50% threshold, then there are no requirements other than to submit to Utilities a floodplain use permit and a detailed cost estimate of the proposed improvements. There is a $25 permit fee. Contact Marsha Hilmes-Robinson at 224-6036 with questions. been used previesly ------••• • ••�► �QY� a� � cnan a or use from how this buildin has Please note that aerial maps showing the extent of the City's 0.5 feet floodway are being included with these comments for the applicant's use. Response Thank You Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic; General Number. 22 Created: 3/22/2006 [3/22/06] (No comments until new development is proposed on the site.) Response -Thank You►► Page 3 Department: Stormwater-Water.Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan TopiC: Utility plans Number. 18 ty 13/21/061 Since no utility construction is being contemplated with th s/project, no utili is required. If any grading is proposed then a grading plan would be required. plan Response —aaree. RMRP has no plans for aradin this site It seems that a ditch is being filled, please locate that ditch on the map. This ditch is called Put to be filled, however, this needs to be evaluated depending on whether the ditch is conveying any off -site flows from the west. A site visit should be set up to help us evaluate the impact of the grading proposed on the site and to try to find an appropriate location for the cages. thi_ Show the location of the Josh Ames ditch on the plans. ReSnnncrs — The 1--L. A :-_ _.. . Call out the Dry Creek channel. Response - aaree Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez ToP/c; Zoning Number. 3 Created: 3 13/13/06] No Issues assuming that the cages will similar tothe ones at th0ee current location shown in pictures. Response —same design different material to eliminate fire nsk Please return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. The project has been tentatively scheduled for the April 20"' Planning and Zoning Board hearing. In order to be retained on the agenda, revised development plans and written materials in response to the review comments must be received no later than March 31,4. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Cameron Gloss Current Planning Director Page 4