HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCCLELLANDS CREEK THIRD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2011-11-07Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: April 16, 2010
Project:
MCCLELLAND'S CREEK, 3RD FILING - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE I
AND FINAL PLANS (33-01Q)
Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Construction Plans
Number: 39 Created: 4/12/2010
[4/12/10] The striping plan sheet indicates the striping of a left turn lane from Kechter onto
Northern Lights Drive which I don't think was intended and is a carryover from the previous
design.
Number: 41 Created: 4/13/2010
[4/13/10] For the alley type driveway on the northwest area of the site (on the road design
portion of the plans) please call out the use of concrete to the property line and refer to
detail 706.
Number: 42 Created: 4/13/2010
[4/13/10] Indicate the use of Type III barricades as the "end of roadway marker" on the
phasing exhibit and provide a detail for the Type III barricades either on that sheet or the
details section.
Number: 47 Created: 4/13/2010
[4/13/10] The phasing plan results in Phase 1 having one point of access to
Kechter/Northern Lights. In checking with PFA they require a second point of access be
established for Phase 1. As a result, either Phase 1 need to incorporate construction of a
fully built Wild Elm Way (or Oak Shadow/Wild Elm Way), or a temporary roadway surface
suitable for PFA is constructed in some manner from the proposed Phase 1 out to Strauss
Cabin Road.
Number: 58 Created: 4/16/2010
[4/16/10] On the phasing plan please encapsulate which phase it is proposed that the
frontage improvement along Kechter Road will be constructed. It would appear that the
intention is to construct Kechter with Phase 2, though without a delineated boundary around
all of Phase 2, it's not apparently certain.
�Grr
C"//
Date
HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
✓ Plat ,Site Drainage Report Other
=Utility ,/Redline Utility andscape
Page 1
Number: 59 Created: 4/16/2010
[4/16/10] Continuing on #58, if it is intended that the portion of Kechter Road being
improved is not to be built until Phase 2, it appears that a two phase signing and striping
plan will be needed to distinguish striping changes needed with Phase 1 from Phase 2. (If
the intention is to delay any changes in striping on Kechter Road until Phase 2 work on
Kechter, there would at least need to be striping changes to Kechter on Phase 2 in order to
make a westbound to southbound left turn movement from Kechter Road to Northern Lights
Drive.)
Number: 60 Created: 4/16/2010
[4/16/10] The striping plan does not tie into the existing striping to the west. There is no
center turn lane heading west due to the creation of parking along the south side of Kechter
Road for Zach Elementary. Please have the Phase 1 striping plan reflect how the existing
striping to the west is intended to be tied into. Traffic Operations will be evaluating the
amount of stack shown on this striping plan for both left turn movements at Northern Lights
Drive compared to the traffic study.
Number: 61 Created: 4/16/2010
[4/16/10] The phasing exhibit for the termination in Phase 1 of Wild Elm Way, Oak Shadow
Way, and Northern Lights Drive creates small sections of asphalt roadway for these streets
at the termination of Phase 1. For purposes of integrity of these roadway sections, the
proposed phasing would require that sections of existing asphalt are milled out with the
continuation of the streets in Phase 2 (and a note on the plans should be provided stating to
that effect). Perhaps there are slight alterations to the phasing plan that can be explored that
would result in less or no portions of existing asphalt needing to be milled.
Number: 63 Created: 4/16/2010
[4/16/10] The 1606(a) and 1607(a) details refer to the interim designs. Please update the
reference date to 4/1/07 which are the latest approved specifications (admittedly it doesn't
appear that the design specs themselves have changed).
Topic: General
Number: 48 Created: 4/14/2010
[4/14/10] In discussion at staff review, it appears that the proposed trail connection to the
west isn't consistent with Craig Foreman's recollection of how the trail would be constructed.
His understanding was redlined by him on the phasing plan of the construction set. Craig
also indicated that a cost sharing of the trail with Parks would be acceptable. The detail so
this can be encapsulated in the development agreement
Number: 49 Created: 4/14/2010
[4/14/10] In discussion at staff review it appears that a phasing plan will be needed for the
landscaping plan to reflect the proposed phasing illustrated in the construction drawings.
Number: 62 Created: 4/16/2010
[4/16/10] The conditions in the original development agreement for McClelland's Creek PD
& PLD 2nd Filing, from a Streets perspective, will need to be included with the development
agreement for this project that will supercede that previous development agreements. One
change in this regard will be the amount of security for the future construction of Strauss
Cabin Road and High Desert Place. Engineering has since adopted the protocol of requiring
125% of the estimated for a cash/check security rather than the previous 100%.
Page 2
Fort I Collins
Current Planning
Pt) Box 580
Fort Collins, C'(") 80521-0580
tax: 970-224-01 4
DATE: March 17, 2010
FINAL PLAN
COMMENT SHEET
TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt
# 28-09/A
MCCLELLAND'S CREEK, 3P-D FILING - MAJOR
11131 Di► 10105 010Mn
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting:
April 14, 2010
Note -.Please identify your redlines -for _future reference
2] No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
Name (please prin%)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
y
P Frt �
o Collins
Current Planning
Fort Cu(1ins, C() 81)5222-05M
()7(/-224-01 >4
DATE: March 17, 2010
TO: Technical Services
FINAL PLAN
COMMENT SHEET
PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt M V
# 28-09/A
MCCLELLAND'S CREEK, 3" FILING — MAJOR
AN IYNDMENT
f, TH�QF A(1-E /YIt 55rNls R£�PTrv-rt1 aodE,eA 401 �va17-/Fa,0-r e,9M/A/S SA,JiIM
�� STit'� G i E�4' S� E,JT e^/ T�-/E' SuBb�✓, Sr Pu�7;
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting:
RCCC-O" 1VaMBC,eS �oQ lsoLrTk �-o,2t-4"1AAS S�NW^_
�/SThtGr o"emewT D�TqE SITlS, C Azof (SHEcT5 SZ S4
3 TNT NPsu►-PK ��A�s ,April 14 2ql q SScI�S o'i✓ Sf{EETS GP/o/,
Note -.Please identify our redlines or future re erenee
4. A64 ,SDP 4 No rC V14G471tA/b F-X i sTiArt.. £-*sc-m 6v*r'S f Zr-DcDle.*frt.dG i4 5
❑ No Problems
(j Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
Name (,ilease print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
XPlat ,.Site _Drainage Report _Other
4Utility ,Redline Utility Landscape
Project Comments Sheet
City of Fart Collins Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: August 31, 2009
Project:
MCCLELLAND'S CREEK, 3RD FILING - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE 1
(33-01 Q)
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
August 26, 2009
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Construction Plans
Number: 11 Created: 8/25/2009
[8/25/09] The overall phasing exhibit (EX4) seems to be lacking any indication as to which
phases are I and II.
Number: 12 Created: 8/25/2009
[8/25/09] Please update the construction details to the latest LCUASS standards (4/1/07
version).
Number: 14 Created: 8/25/2009
[8/25/09] The construction drawings appear to have instances where they refer to
McClelland's Creek 2nd from the previous plan set, and should be updated to this Filing.
Number: 16 Created: 8/26/2009
[8/26/09] The street design for Kechter Road on the west half of the development seems to
have been left out. The keymap on Sheet R12 indicates that this should be on Sheet R11,
but this information is not present.
Number: 17 Created: 8/26/2009
(8/26/09] The elimination of the right turn lane on eastbound Kechter Road to southbound
Northern Lights Drive is a change from the second filing. The traffic report indicates that the
need is not met, but similar to #13, 1 don't believe the report takes into account the potential
development to the south, which could add additional volume and perhaps demonstrate the
turn lane is still warranted.
Signatur DaWe
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
V/' Plat _Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility Redline Utility �L Landscape
Page 1
Topic: General
Number: 13 Created: 8/25/2009
[8/25/09] The TIS stated that the classification of Strauss Cabin Road south of Kechter
Road should be a rural residential street. The report does not appear to account for potential
development of the Swift property directly to the south however. In addition, the criteria of a
rural residential street is such that it "may be used for internal local streets of developments,
with minimum lot sizes of 1 acre or larger..." This roadway isn't internal to the development
and the development itself does not have any lots that are 1 acre. I don't see how the rural
residential standard can be applied towards Strauss Cabin and the previous design of
Strauss Cabin as a standard residential street should be implemented.
Number: 15 Created: 8/25/2009
[8/25/09] The meandering sidewalk along Kechter probably isn't problematic from a City
perspective, however I would assume that snow removal operations with this meandering
walk would be a little more time consuminig (and costly) for the HOA to maintain? Just a
thought.
Number: 18 Created: 8/26/2009
[8/26/09] My general pre -hearing items of concerns are:
- Reconfiguration of Strauss Cabin Road to a standard residential street south of Kechter
Road.
- Verification with traffic operations on the appropriateness of the elimination of the right turn
lane from Kechter to Northern Lights Drive.
Page 2
F6rt Collins
urrent
Planning
PO Box 580 ` Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750 ` 970.224.6134 - fax
DATE: August 12, 2009
TO: Technical Services
PROJECT
COMMENT
SHEET
PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt MV
1, PC'c-ASe 4r>D "Br -note, A iZC-Pc-9T of To Two' Sue •7-iT[.45 oA) 4u, SA�te-c—TS_
#28-09 MCCLELLAND'S CREEK, 3RD FILING —
MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE I
Z , P�,ER s E 0-r, vLre CT" TH (zED c. Inc- o p r STi4 N �� s DA.J 5 t-I EET Z J 3, Tf-1 E y
vv N rf7" !MATC_w
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting•
3. tef C-�1-5E 4vr> SYm .,,_ ro "T.e-4 5,,a AtaR-R- �PM a/7'S owl 73coC S
1 AI77 l e-A-rE GJkCTN E A 7wep � l-15 eFi , Jim O)e '56rT.
4_. (✓&Asp r�ts2r_E-� e,u►evEAu-.QCt-09L,05 , 9 f46 7-6xT 15 -1 &V LIGP-r.
5; Pic-,+5E f}Dc> Nnt5SrnJV p►STA-A1GE � F3e74-P-+Ne. Yo N4P-1-( 5r01E OF_BcoG
Note - Please identify your redlines for future Z.
reference
(,.5IT6OV0,15 µ/five LINE oVi✓K- -7777(SSuE5.
No Problems
XO Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
— . r, A-iJV 5CA-Pl; Pi AfS H "C- L,, &M D ✓e-� rC-V -i 155 uE 5 ,
WCM sr}C, 1z51A
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat XSite
X Utility X Redline Utility
_Drainage Report _Other.
X Landscape