Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFRONT RANGE VILLAGE - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2009-01-27Traftsportation Services Engineering Department October 5, 2004 Bret A. Cummock, P.E. Senior Associate Stantec Consulting Inc. Fort Collins, CO 80521-2603 RE: The Summit Lifestyle Center Variance Requests Dear Bret: This letter is to inform you that the City Engineer has formerly acted upon the two variance requests you submitted dated September 8 and September 13 regarding a sight distance easement and a commercial driveway design. In evaluating the first variance, the City Engineer has granted your request to use a 30 mph design speed, reducing the sight distance easement required at the intersection of a private drive with Brownell Drive. With regards to the second variance, the City Engineer has granted your request to design a larger radius, specifically on the south side of the driveway only. He felt sufficient justification was provided on the need to enlarge the radius (thereby creating a driveway width wider than standards) on the south side of the driveway but he did not see any justification to enlarge the radius on the north side of the driveway as it appears unlikely large trucks would need to proceed northbound on Corbett Drive. As such, it is his position that the radius on the north side of the driveway should be designed to the standard of 15 feet. Please inform me of any questions or concerns you might have. Sincerely, Marc P. Virata, P.E. Civil Engineer II 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 8052M580 • (970) 221-6605 • FAX (970) 221-6378 www.fcgov.com No Text Memorandum To: Front Range Village project file From: Marc Virata ._t' / Date: 1 /21 /2009 Re: note to file Front Range Village was determined by Current Planning to be a major amendment to the Summit Front Range (Lifestyle Center) Project Development Plan. Most of the documentation pertaining to Summit Front Range was not kept and is not included in the Front Range Village project file due to the information no longer being pertinent to the Front Range Village development. The correspondence retained herein that was for Summit Front Range (from 2005 and earlier) is being retained because of its relevance to the Front Range Village project. Di�gon�l Divert�r �t Kinc•�sley Drive end P�ciciington Road ri T�II"I`l Restricting Island New Curb and Gutter Asphalt Patch stantec.com Transmittal Stantec Inc. 209 South Meldrum Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Tel: (303) 482-5922 Fax: (303) 482-6368 To: Marc Virata nC Ua From: Tony Willkomm Company: Stantec ❑ For Your Information Address: City of Fort Collins ❑ For Your Approval Engineering For Your Review Phone: ❑ As Requested Date: September 11, 2006 File: Trans Delivery: Delivery Reference: Front Range Village Variance Request with Exhibit A Enclosed with transmittal is a revised copy of the Variance Request for Front Range Village. The width at back of walk on the east entrance driveway was corrected in the letter to match the exhibit dimension. Please discard old copy and circulate to Gary Diede for his review. Thank you, STAANTEC INC. �W Senior Design Engineer Tel: 970-482-5922 Fax: 970-482-6368 awilikomm@stantec.com Attachment: Letter and Exhibits Stantec Consulting Inc. 209 South Meldrum Street Fort Collins CO 80521-2603 Tel:(970) 482-5922 Fax:(970) 482-6368 stantec.com StanteC September 8, 2006 City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Attention: Mr. Gary Diede, Acting City Engineer Reference: Front Range Village Variance Request for Width and Radius of Commercial Driveway Dear Mr. Diede: This letter is application for a variance request to the width and curb return radii of a commercial driveway approach under the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LUCASS) for the private driveway connecting to the rear building access in the above referenced project. This variance is being requested as part of the final public improvements construction plans as requested by City staff. Identifying Issue: The standard requested to be modified is the Width of a Commercial Approach (LUCASS 9.3.8.A) and Curb Return Radii (LUCASS 8.2.9.A) for the private driveway located on the east side of Corbett Drive near the northerly terminus of Corbett Drive. Per LUCASS, the maximum permitted width of a commercial drive approach is 36 feet wide (without an island) measured at the back of sidewalk and the curb return radii for a high volume driveway is 15 feet. LUCASS Drawing 707 indicates that commercial driveways wider than 36 feet shall be divided with a median not less than 6' wide. Due to the need to accommodate larger vehicles for the delivery and unloading of goods at the rear of the retail buildings, a larger curb return radius is needed (see attached exhibit) for the indicated driveways. It should be noted that the actual drive aisle width for the driveway west driveway 35 feet wide and the east driveway is 30 feet wide. These are within the maximum allowable width per LUCASS. However, the large curb return radii is needed to accommodate the movements of a WB-67 truck makes the width at the back of sidewalk larger than the maximum 36 feet allowed per code. 2. Proposing Alternate Design: The proposed alternative design is to provide 35 foot curb return radii for the both east and west driveways at the intersection with Corbett Drive as shown on the attached exhibit. The width of the driveway at the back of sidewalk (right- of-way) will be 41.3 foot wide on the west driveway and 36.3 foot wide on the east Stantec September 8, 2006 Mr. Gary Diode, Acting City Engineer Page 2 of 2 Reference: Front Range Village driveway. The exhibit depicts the vehicle path for the turning movements of a WB-67 truck which is the largest vehicle anticipated to provide delivery service to the retail center. Based on the turning path analysis of the WB-67 truck, placing a 6' wide median would not be practical for this service aisle as it would impede the ability of the large trucks to make the necessary turning movement without driving over the top of the median so a median is not proposed in the design. In addition, the driveway width is 30 feet and 35 feet wide, only the opening due to the larger curb return radii exceeds the 36 feet of width which requires a median. 3. Comparing to Standards: The variance request, if granted, would increase the width of the driveway opening and enlarge the curb return radii in an area that accesses the load/unload zones for the retail center. Increasing the curb return radius from 15' to 35' will enable the WB-67 delivery vehicles to make the turn into the service aisle behind the building without running over the landscaping/utilities/sidewalk outside of the driveway area. The larger radii and width will also enable the delivery vehicles to make the turn quicker and reduce any impacts to the traffic flow on Corbett Drive. There are no identified impacts to the City for capital and maintenance costs created by this request. 4. Justification: It is the applicants opinion that granting this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Further this variance will not reduce the design life of the roadway nor cause the City of Fort Collins additional maintenance costs. It is the applicant's opinion that the granting of this variance will advance the public purpose of the driveway width standards equally well to the current standard in LUCASS. The larger curb return radii will improve the ability of delivery vehicles to access the load/unload zones behind the retail center in a safe and efficient manner without having to backup or make other unsafe movements in the public street system. Your consideration of this request is greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter in more detail, please feel free to call. Sincerely, STANTEC CONSULTING INC. I 4nthony-G. illkomm, P.E. Project gineer Tel:970-482-5922 Fax:970-482-6368 awilikomm@stantec.com c. Christopher Huffman, Bayer Properties v:152870Pactive11870102511managemenh etter memosldriveway radius variance request 081706.doc w I w HOMEIMPROVEMENT m REAR DRIVEWAY WEST 35.0' of �4, 3' 0 U i I I I w _ REAR DRIVEWAY EAST 30.0' 36.3' ILH � U 0 30 45 60 1:30 C.PYRMFIT 7275 nr CJ].- �ao.flR s'^M� - ni 209 Swth Meld m BAYER PROPERTIES INC. FRONT RANGE VILLAGE 187010251 nw nc vo. FII FL Collins, CO 80521-= FEW(970)482-5M2 Fox.(970) 4826368 EX -A vV+LLNC 111 ry�y �ilY11lR µryny stantmcom EXHIBITA ORDIMENSIONS �nO It oy -�13 3 2a �oF V\526701\active\18701025I\Premminory\Smwln9s\civil\mhl6lla\Variance onve ex8i6R.8w9 9/8/2006 4WC22 PM I of HOMEIMPROVEMENT m REAR DRIVEWAY WEST I U I I i t 1 1 G CC _3 C L _ +J.er;J WIT-6/ �- 0 30 45 60 T, ' I ° ` It .n 11 eze a e aoo i:3o�■■■■� u MIN. RAID. 41.0' COPYRIGHT K xros n — _In --T sTnen'tt °�'' prntmr b 7 - BAYER PROPERTIES INC. FRONT RANGE VILLAGE 187010251 .r n 208 South Maldmm Ft. Collins, CO. 80521-2603 Tel'C.11 tl 482-5922 Fax (970)482EWB o - EX -A 'PLLkL f g��� StantR ..stant..com n u of IP' yr EXHIBIT A n9-2ao� l 3r WEST DRIVEWAY TRUCK PATH Ji V.\528)0(\oclive\18]010251\Prtlimirory\drawings\civil\exhibits\Variance Ohve exhibrtdwg 9/8/2006 44428 PM LLI m O U 1500 00 00 11 1.- uc WGSI rc:.< 0 30 45 60 ivlh 8-c 1:30 MIN. RAD. 41.0' CO MUHT C2. nn aaLdELi s rnwr6x wi.: vrnlc,�-� ��-� BAYER PROPERTIES INC. 187010251 r u crk FRONT RANGE VILLAGE 209 South Wdwm uMo, Ft Collins, CO 80521-2W3 Fe.(WO) 4825922 EX -A II LV01 1 Fax.(WO) 4828368 RantR WWW.61HnIeC.o0m �rtlC or che'xirvG EXHIBIT A EAST DRIVEWAY TRUCK PATH 11 1P i CI 3 V:\528)01\pctive\IB)01015t\preliminary\tlroxings\dva\evnibits\Vmbnce Drive eAnb,t d, 9/8/2006 4:44:36 PM EAU MMXMI —��A ta 1 VENT'U:RES November 8, 2006 Larry Fox 4105 Ziegler Rd. Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Letter of Intent for Land Purchase 4111 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Larry: I enjoyed meeting you last week and look forward to working together to complete this acquisition. The following proposal establishes the basic terms and conditions under which Front Range Retail Company, LLC will agree to purchase the above -referenced property. Any agreement by the parties will not be binding unless and until a mutually acceptable purchase agreement is executed by and delivered to both parties, The primary terms of a Purchase Agreement will be the following: 1. Property Location: 2. Property Size: 3. Condition: 4. 5. 6. Sellers: 4105 Ziegler Rd., Fort Collins, CO 3,710 square feet (0,085 acres). The parcel is described on the attached Exhibit A. As -is. -DeamrMifler, Douglas L. Dietz & Donnette G. Fox Buyer: Front Range Retail Company, LLC c/o Bayer Property Group 2222 Arlington Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 Purchase Price: 7. Escrow Deposit: $1,000 in cash due within five days of Buyer's receipt of a fully executed purchase agreement. The Escrow Deposit is nonrefundable, but applicable to purchase price. 8. Ditch rights Buyer will receive the rights to the irrigation water that currently owned by Seller. 11805 North Pennsylvania Street • Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 706-6747 • Fax (317) 706-6748 Services Engineering Department.. Citv of Fort Collins September 30, 2004 Mr. David L. Silverstein, Principal Bayer Properties Incorporated 2222 Arlington Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 RE: Summit Off -site Trail to English Ranch Dear David: Please allow this letter to serve as a City response to your concerns expressed at our past conference call (September 21, 2004) regarding a trail connection as it pertains to your project, The Summit Front Range. You expressed concern on a condition placed in the draft development agreement stipulating your obligation to construct an off -site trail connecting your development to the English Ranch Neighborhood. In my recollection of the conversation, you brought up security and liability as key issues, as well as questioning whether the connection would be more appropriate at the time future development occurs to the north between The Summit and English Ranch. It should be noted that the off -site trail connection is required to be situated within a public access easement. As such the City is responsible for matters of security. Further, after the maintenance and repair period guarantee period, (which within this prescribed period requires the developer to maintain and repair the trail as stipulated on the plat and development agreement), Bayer will not have any further responsibility of maintenance or repair. This should help with your concerns over liability. As the City attendees at this conference call had no first hand knowledge of the evolution of the trail requirement, I had indicated that City Staff would need to revisit this requirement and respond back to you. Staff has multiple reasons for justifying the construction of this trail connection by the development. 1. First, this trail connection is viewed as a compromise from not having to construct a street to the English Ranch Neighborhood. 2. In addition, the trail is necessary to satisfy level of service requirements for connectivity into the English Ranch Neighborhood. In accordance with the City's level of service requirements, The Summit development is creating a destination for existing neighborhoods such as English Ranch that requires the construction of an adequate pedestrian facility. The Summit destination 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6605 • FAX (970) 221-6378 www.fcgov.com 0 10. 11 12. Proposed Use: Future Right -of -Way for expansion of Ziegler Road. Buyers work: As part of the land acquisition, Buyer will perform construction work to accommodate Sellers. This work is further described on exhibit B to this letter (attached). Closing: Within 180 days of the execution of the purchase agreement Closing Costs: Buyer will pay all closing costs 13. Purchase Prepared by Buyer. Contract: Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, Eureka Ventures, agent for Front Range Retail Company, LLC g;; / : ric ?M-a Its: Agent Agreed and accepted this _ day of 2006 Sellers: By: Its: Stantet Consulting Inc 209 South Meldmm Street Fort Collins CO 80521.2603 Tel: (970) 482.5922 Far. (970) 482.6368 stantec.com EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION A tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the 6'h Principal Meridian, City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows; Basis of Bearings: the East line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 32, monumented at the East Quarter Corner by a 2 %2" Aluminum Cap, LS 17497, and the Southeast Comer by a 3" Larimer County brass cap with a line between assumed to bear South 00011'07" West, with all bearings herein relative thereto. COMMENCIN r at the East 1/4 Comer of said Section 32, Thence North 89°20'43" West, 30.00 feet to the existing Westerly right-of-way of Ziegler Road, and the Northeast corner of that parcel described at Reception No.98065862 of the records of Larimer County, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING - Thence South 00011'07" West, 175.00 feet along the existing Westerly right-of-way of Ziegler Road to the Southeast corner of said parcel described at Reception No. 98065862; Thence North 89020'43" West, 21.36 feet along the Southerly line of said parcel described at Reception No. 98065862; Thence North 00°10'52" East 132.65 feet; Thence North 02002' 19" East, 42.35 feet to the North line of said parcel decribed at Reception No 98065862 and the Southeast comer of Tract B English Ranch South P.U,D. Thence South 89'20'43" East, 20.00 feet along the Northerly line of said parcel described at Reception No. 98065862 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING The above described tract contains 3,710 square feet, more or less, and is subject to all easements and rights of way of record or existing. Thomas William Nicholas Colorado Professional Land Surveyor Registration Number 28657 .o0%t. ntre ,���i VA52871flactivelsurvey\EXHIBITS11870100041EX003-row.doc X-0 April 11, 2005 tmV �p ; 4 90 � 286 PADDINGTON ROAD �d d ss I N I 00 1 Z N I ,00*01 J f�Oo oN 0l2 O = OZO IZE ZQ= W LL O I-. Z O IL W F 3 d LL O I u O An nZ U yd 0,z �HW�U t Rall EXHIBIT B The following will be completed by Buyer as part of the land acquisition for the expansion of Ziegler Road: Construct a 6 foot high brick wall along the ROW at the back of the sidewalk. This will be built on top of the retaining wall to be built as part of the road widening project. • Your home will be connected to the city sanitary sewer system. Buyer will pay all costs to connect Seller to this system. • Relocation of existing water meters and other utilities disturbed by the ROW construction. Drainage culvert will be installed under the driveway entrance to insure that storm water is not trapped in your yard. Install trench drains in front of your garage where construction work may cause water to be directed towards your garage. '/• Repair any damage to your irrigation system or other utilities caused by the construction. • Guard rails will be incorporated into the brick wall to prevent automobiles from breaking through wall. Landscaping will be replaced and supplemented as needed. MU ICIMINN A November 8, 2006 David L. Young Eunice A. Young 4109 Ziegler Rd. Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Letter of Intent for Land Purchase Ziegler Road Dear David and Eunice: I enjoyed meeting you again last week and look forward to working together to complete this acquisition. The following proposal establishes the basic terms and conditions under which Front Range Retail Company, LLC will agree to purchase the above -referenced property. Any agreement by the parties will not be binding unless and until a mutually acceptable purchase agreement is executed by and delivered to both parties. The primary terms of a Purchase Agreement will be the following: 1. Property 4109 Ziegler Rd., Fort Collins, CO Location: 2. Property Size: 3,737 square feet (0.086 acres). The parcel is described on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Condition: As -is. 4. Seller: David L. Young and Eunice A. Young 5. Buyer: Front Range Retail Company, LLC c/o Bayer Property Group 2222 Arlington Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 6. Purchase Price: $50,00o.00. 7. Escrow Deposit: $1,000 in cash due within five days of Buyer's receipt of a fully executed purchase agreement. The Escrow Deposit is nonrefundable, but applicable to the purchase price. 11805 North Pennsylvania Street • Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 706-6747 • Fax (317) 706-6748 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Proposed Use: Future Right -of -Way for expansion of Ziegler Road. Buyers work: As part of the land acquisition, Buyer will perform construction work to accommodate Sellers. This work is further described on exhibit B to this letter (attached). Closing: Within 180 days of the execution of the purchase agreement. Closing Costs: Buyer will pay all closing costs Purchase Prepared by Buyer. Contract: Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, Eureka Ventures, agent for Front Range Retail Company, LLC y: f6iric Mallon Its: Agent Agreed and accepted this day of 2006 Sellers: By: Its: EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION A tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the 6t^ Principal Meridian, City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows; Basis of Bearings: the East line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 32, monumented at the East Quarter Corner by a 2 %2" Aluminum Cap, LS 17497, and the Southeast Corner by a 3" Larim.er,Qounty brass cap with a line between assumed to bear South 00° 11'07" West, with all bearings herein relative thereto, COMMENCING at the East 1/4 Corner of said'Section 32, Thence North 89020'43" West, 30.00 feet to th_ existing Westerly right-of-way of Ziegler Road; Thence South 00011'07" West, 175.00 along the existing Westerly right-of-way of Ziegler Road to the Northeast corner of that parcel described at Reception No.95028976 of the records of Larimer County, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING• Thence South 00011'07" West, 175.00 feet along the existing Westerly right-of-way of Ziegler Road to the Southeast comer of said parcel described at Reception No. 95028976; Thence North 89°21'21" West, 21.35 feet along the Southerly line of said parcel described at Reception No, 95028976; Thence North 00° 10'52" East, 175.01 feet to the North line of said parcel decribed at Reception No 95028976; Thence South 89°20'43" East, 21.36 feet along the Northerly he of said parcel described at Reception No. 95028976 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described tract contains 3,737 square feet, more or less, and is subject to all easements and rights of way of record or existing. Thomas William Nicholas Colorado Professional Land Surveyor Registration Number 28657 April\52 87 112, 20tive\surveylEXfIIBITS\1870100041EX003-SOUTHrorv.doc April 12, 2005 hvn/ ,00'O£ £4.OZ.E z I I I I I I I I L I yu N I n A A I I N LL ro to toW0 a oo 1 pW j a I o z I z I z o wz w ow I o O¢ I I Ix IJ 3 ,£3,OZ.6E ,9£'IZ IZ,IZ.6 0 LLF K.3�a OZ��� Zc a Otte L Z W 4 w z ZJ O z a w "F 1ZJ WK y aw wo o p a 2 N U W N A- U F a i� m n h� c� z� EXHIBIT B The following will be completed by Buyer as part of the land acquisition for the expansion of Ziegler Road: • Construct a 6 foot high brick wall along the ROW at the back of the sidewalk. This will be built on top of the retaining wall to be built as part of the road widening project. • Your home will be connected to the city sanitary sewer system. Buyer will pay all costs to connect Seller to this system. • Relocation of existing water meters and other utilities disturbed by the ROW construction. • Drainage culvert will be installed under the driveway entrance to insure that storm water is not trapped in your yard. • Install trench drains in front of your garage where construction work may cause water to be directed towards your garage. • Relocate large lilac bush from your front yard to your back yard. We will also make reasonable efforts to save as many trees as practical. • Repair any damage to your irrigation system or other utilities caused by the construction. • Salvage existing vinyl fence to be reused by Seller. • Replace and supplement landscaping. , `~ STAFF PROJECT REVIEW BHA DESIGN, INC SCOTT SINN Date: 12/01/2006 4803 INNOVATION DR. FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for FRONT RANGE VILLAGE - MAJOR AMENDMENT, and we offer the following comments: Response to comments are provide below in italics ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Drawings Number: 31 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Please ensure that concrete is used at all driveway intersections with public streets (Corbett and Ziegler). Response: Concrete extended to ROW Number: 32 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 Please ensure and call out that the pedestrian crossings at the roundabout are done in concrete. Is the intention for the crosswalks to be enhanced here or striped? Response: Concrete to outside limits of crosswalks with enhance paving perhaps stamped concrete or patterned asphalt. Number: 34 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Please label the existing right-of-way/property line boundary on the Harmony Road and Ziegler Road drawings. Response: Done Number: 35 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 The striping on the offsite designs seems to show the use of angle points. Please ensure that the design of the roadways avoids the use of angle points. Response: No angle points, radius added. Number: 36 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Please prepare an offsite easement/right-of-way exhibit to help keep track of the impacts occurring outside of right-of-way. Response: Compied list of properties impacted by onsite and offsite improvements. Necessary ROW and easements required are established as plans develop. Summary to be provided. Number: 40 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 The project will need to continue a design of Corbett Drive with the elimination of the cul-de-sac bulb and offsite design for 500 feet. Response: Future design of extended Corbett Dr. in street plan and profile as future. The alignment of this extension does not represent what must be built in future but provided as required by code. area is why the trail connection is required at this time, not at the time of future development to the north. 3. Finally, the trail connection is specifically noted as a condition of approval (Condition No. 1) for the development as approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on October 16, 2003. This condition of approval was the result of the reasons stated previously as well as the discussion made by members of the Planning and Zoning Board during theapproval approval of the project. Given this information, and also noting that the trail connection has been a part of the designs submitted to the City for review, we are concerned by your contention that this off -site trail should not be a requirement of your development. If your position is to not construct this trail connection, City Staff cannot simply remove it from the development agreement. Since the trail connection is noted as a condition of approval for the project, you would be required to submit a major amendment to the development plan requesting not to construct the trail connection. This major amendment would then have to go before the Planning and Zoning Board for a hearing and approval. I hope this adequately explains the City's position on the trail connection. Please let me know of any questions or clarifications you might have on this issue. Hopefully the information provided will help in reaching a resolution to this item that is viewed as beneficial and equitable to everyone. Sincerely, arc P. Virata, P.E. Civil Engineer II cc: Paul Eckman, Deputy City Attorney Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager Bruce Hendee — bha design Carolynne White — Brownstein Hyatt & Farber 2 Number: 41 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 An inlet is shown on the northeast corner of the Corbett Drive and Harmony Road that sits in conflict with the sidewalk along Harmony Road. Response: Inlets revised in plans Number: 42 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] A storm pipe appears to be in conflict with the sidewalk along the cul-de-sac bulb at the north end of the site. Response: Storm layour revised Number: 45 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The plan and profile sheets for Corbett Drive indicate an intent of showing centerline profile and one flowline profile. The project will need to show flowline profiles for both sides of a public street. Response: Final plan profiles both flowlines. Number: 46 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The variance request from Stantec to Gary Diede will likely be approved, although an original copy of the variance request with the exhibit cited in the request was not found. Please resubmit the information for verification of the information presented. Response: Variance with exhibit resubmitted to Engineering. Number: 47 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The termination of the bikelanes approaching the roundabout on Corbett in both directions requires the use of access ramps. The termination location of the bike lanes on the south leg of the roundabout may be of concern with Traffic Engineering. Response: Bike lanes ramps included to take bikes off to 10' sidewalk around aroundabout. Number: 74 Created: 9/1 /2006 [9/1/06] The offsite designs need to include Corbett and Ziegler further south of their respective Harmony intersections. Response: Corbett and Ziegler improvements will extend south far enough to re -stripe and match to existing. Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 8/21/2006 [8/21/06] There appears to be several offsite easements/rights-of-way required for the project: `For Harmony Road - Pads at Harmony (Gino Campana) to tie the north side of Snow Mesa to the widening of Harmony Road - PVH for grading, sidewalk, and signal pole at the southwest corner of Corbett and Harmony - The Group building for grading and sidewalk at the southeast corner of Corbett and Harmony - (former) LSI building for road widening - Avago for sidewalk and grading at the northeast corner of Ziegler and Harmony - Clark -Greenlee Properties, LLC for sidewalk, curb & gutter and signal pole installation at the southwest corner of Ziegler and Harmony - Intel for sidewalk and construction at the southeast corner of Ziegler and Harmony *For Ziegler Road - Avago for driveway entrance reconfiguration - David and Eunice Young for grading and sidewalk along Ziegler - Douglas Dietz for grading and sidewalk along Ziegler - Emmaus Orthodox Presbyterian Church for road widening along Ziegler - James Chinn for improvements on the southeast corner of Ziegler and Horsetooth - English Ranch 4th for improvements on the southwest corner of Ziegler and Horsetooth - Stone Ridge 4th for improvements on the northwest corner of Ziegler and Horsetooth - Cottonwood Land and Farms for improvements on the northeast corner of Ziegler and Horsetooth *For the pedstrian connection to English Ranch - English Ranch South 3rd Filing for pedestrian connection to Paddington Road, or Bartran Family LLC and LSI property "An emergency access easement on LSI property The list above was based upon the information I could make out from the submittal package. There may be additional properties. The submittal requirements note that letters of intent must be submitted prior to scheduling a public hearing, while this requirement has been waived by the CPES Director, a status on the negotiations between the developer and the property owners would be beneficial as part of the staff report for the project. Response: List of owners impacted is compiled and with ROW exhibits for client/land owner discussions. Status of negotiations will be provided as available. Number: 13 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/061 The sidewalk running along the east side of Corbett heading north of the furthest north driveway should not be built, just the access ramp. Funds for sidewalk will then need to be provided for the 120+/- feet such that it can be extended with future development. Response: Ramp to south will be constructed at the northern most driveway on the east side. East -west pedestrian crossing removed. Funding for future extension to be negotiated in the development agreement. Number: 33 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The emergency access easement shown on the plat and the construction drawing emergency access route plan (C-120) show that an emergency access easement dead ends at the LSI property. An offsite emergency access easement is needed. Response: An emergency access easement will be by separate document from the current land owner. (To be addressed at FCP) Number: 38 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] I've suggested additional access ramp crossing along the private drive on the construction drawings. These are not required. The access ramps in front of the outparcels I think may especially beneficial to tie future development of the outparcels into the rest of the center. Response: Ramp loctions on private drive revised with crossings provided N,,i _3 Number: 39 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The project will need to provide an escrow for the future connection of Corbett Drive to the northern boundary of the site, the removal of the cul-de-sac bulb, the sidewalk along the west side of Corbett Drive, and additional street trees along Corbett Drive. Response: The Development Agreement will address these items. Number: 43 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] PFA has indicated that the private drive will need to be named for addressing purposes. Response: Private Drive name to be provided by project planner (BHA) with input by the owner. Number: 44 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 The construction drawings indicate the delineation of parcels for the areas along Harmony Road, the plat however does not subdivide the development into parcels or lots. Response: Plat includes lots along Harmony corridor. Number: 53 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 We should have some general discussion regarding how the parcels along Harmony will be vested. If the developer does not wish for the development agreement for the overall property to apply to these parcels, they would need their own development agreements in addition to their respective minor/major amendments. Response: Plat is modified to include the lots. Number: 77 Created: 9/1/2006 [9/1/06] The sidewalk connections on outparcels 2 and 5 will need to be built with the project and access easements need to be shown on the plat. Response: Pedestrian easement has been added to plat to provide for walks as lot develops. Number: 78 Created: 9/1/2006 [9/1/06] Please ensure that an access easement is shown along a private drive alignment west of the roundabout along Corbett connecting to the western boundary of the site to tie into the property in front of the mobile home park. Response: Public Access and Emergency Access Easement included on plat from roundabout west connecting to the southwest corner of site. Number: 79 Created: 9/1/2006 [9/1/06] An access and transit easement needs to be dedicated for the private drive that connects Corbett to Ziegler Road. Response: Transit easement is added to private drive Nee 4 Topic: Landscape plan Number: 48 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 I'd suggest leaving an opening of landscaping along the median within Corbett between the northern edge of parcels 3 and 4 to provide an area that pedestrians could "unofficially" use as refuge between northbound and southbound Corbett movements. Response: See Landscape comments. Topic: Plat Number: 2 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] Corbett right-of-way needs to be dedicated to the north property line boundary, not stop at the cul-de-sac termination. Response: Modification to plat to include full ROW to north platted boundary of the project. Providing Pedestrian, Public access and Utility easement for the balance of the cul-de-sac. Number: 49 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 Please ensure that 9 feet of utility easement is dedicated along the west side of Corbett Drive to the northern property boundary. Response: Utility easement added to plat. Number: 50 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 Rather than dedicate right-of-way for the cul-de-sac bulb at the termination of Corbett Drive, please provide an access easement for the area that would be vacated in the future with the continuation of Corbett Drive. Vacating easement would be an easier process and less costly in the future for the future development to the north. Response: Public access Pedestrian and EmergencyAccess easement added to plat for balance of cul-du-sac. Number: 51 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 The site plan and construction plan documents illustrate the creation of parcels, however the plat does not divide the property out into parcels. Response: Plat reconfigured to include lots. Number: 52 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 The plat needs to show additional information to meet the requirements of a preliminary plat. Response: Plat updated to include lots and dimensions. Meeting held with City Surveyor to incorporate his requests. Topic: Site Plan Number: 37 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The pedestrian connection shown somewhat on the site plan needs to be designed to the north showing a connecting sidewalk to the south side of Paddington. Response: The final plan include the full layout of sidewalk connection to the north. Easement by separate document. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 54 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/06] WATER SUPPLY: Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water Pule flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Flow and spacing requirements for commercial buildings are 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter. It appears from the Site Plan, page 2, that the spacing requirements are met. However, the fire hydrants shown on this page are difficult to locate. The larger -scale drawings on the layout plan show the hydrants more clearly, but sheet 5 (of 10) neglected to show any hydrants. Please draw the hydrants on page 5 and more clearly label the hydrants on the overall site plan. 97UFC901.2.2.2 Response: Comment noted. Number: 55 Created: 8/30/2006 (8/30/061 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: All buildings shall be equipped with approved automatic fire -sprinkler systems. Response: Fire lines added to building for sprinklers requirements per Fire Code. (To be addressed at FCP) Number: 56 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/06] KNOX BOX: Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20 Response: Comment noted. Number: 57 Created: 8/30/2006 (8/30/061 FDC ACCESS: The Fire Department Connections to supply automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in a location easily accessible to fire apparatus: the fire lane side of a building and, when possible, in closest proximity possible to a fire hydrant. Response: Comment noted. Number: 58 Created: 8/30/2006 [8130/061 ADDRESSING: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of six-inch (6) numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).97UFC901.4.4 Response: Comment noted. Number: 59 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Toxic, corrosive, or reactive materials, or flammable/combustible liquids (as defined in the Uniform Fire Code) if used, stored, or handled on site, must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the Planning Department and the Fire Department. (What do you have? How much? How do you prevent it from being a public threat?) FCLUC3.4.5 Response: Comment noted. Applies to contractors use and facility operations. Number: 60 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/06] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. Response: Minimum 6" fire line to be provided. Comment noted. Number: 61 Created: 8/30/2006 [8/30/061 REQUIRED ACCESS: The Emergency Access Easements as shown on the submitted plat are acceptable. When constructed, the fire lanes shall be visible by painting Pa_c 6 and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. UFC901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 Response: Fire lanes to be identify painted curb and signage on final plan. Number: 62 [8/30/061 . Created: 8/30/2006 Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Construction Drawings Number: 64 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] The bicycle and pedestrian connection to English Ranch South needs to be shown in its entirety. This should include information as to the proposed alignment, width, and materials. Response: Final plan to include connection, grading and typical section with materials. Number: 65 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] Please designate the as-yet-un-named Private Drive as a transit easement (or however we've handled it in other situations) so as to ensure that Transfort bus service could one day serve the site. Response: Transit easement added. The name to be determined by owner and planner. Number: 66 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] Sheet C-186 - Ramp locations are missing or do not match the site plan. Please see redlines. Response: Ramp loctations included. Number: 67 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] Sheet C-188 - Add ramps for HC parking. See redlines. Response: Ramps and detail added. Number: 68 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] Sheet C-190 — Pedestrian crossing ramp location is missing. I'd like to see a crossing detail and clarified ramp configurations. Why don't the HC stalls and HC access ramp locations correspond? See redlines. Response: Ramps updated Number: 69 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/061 Sheet C-191 - Ramp and pedestrian crossing addition — it's not clear what is Proposed for the area where the Private Drive meets Ziegler ... See redlines. Response: Ramps and crossing are updated. Number: 70 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] Sheet C-192 - the walkway from the drive aisle out to Harmony (roughly along the parcel line between parcels 1 and 2) needs to be in an access easement. See redline. Response: Pedestrian easement added. Number: 71 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] Sheet C- 193 - The walkway out to Harmony (through Parcel 5) needs to be in an access easement. See redline. Response: Pedestrian easement added. (Complete at PCP) PU2e 7 Topic: General Number: 72 Created: 8/31 /2006 [8/31/06] Bicycle Parking - general comment. This project is required to provide 170 bicycle parking spaces. As it is now, this is not reflected (in full) on the site or utility plans. This will equate to roughly 40 bicycle racks (depending on the chosen design) that need to be spread throughout the development. If the applicant has a certain type of fixture in mind, they will need to check with Transportation Planning to ensure that the proposed rack will meet the requirements of the LUC. Dispersion of bicycle parking throughout the site - for starters, a rack will have to be placed proximate to each store entrance that is in plain view, is secure, and is readily accessible for a customer arriving by bicycle. By my count, this will place about 25 of the required 40 racks. It goes without saying that the areas where bicycle parking is to be provided need to be hard surfaced and free of obstructions. We'll need to make sure there is plenty of bicycle parking available at the east and west ends of the Main Street portion of the private drive as well as proximate to the proposed library entrance. It would probably be a good idea for me to sit down for a brief meeting with the landscape architects to iron out the appropriate locations and quantities. Response: Planner and Architect to position bike parking, will coordinate with placement. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Landscape plan Number: 75 Created: 9/1/2006 [9/1/06] Please specify at final how the proposed detention ponds will be landscaped and whether they will be irrigated. Response: Please see landscape plan for revisions. Will coordinate with planner Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape plan Number: 28 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Maintain minimum separation distances from water/sewer lines. Response: Comment noted. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Plat Number: 76 Created: 9/1/2006 [9/1/06] Why are storm drain lines covered by "private drainage easements" ? All easements should be designated as public drainage easements even when they cover lines on private property, especially since many of these lines are carrying off -site flows and flows from areas within the public rights of way. Please designate all areas covered by detention ponds as public drainage easements. Response. Easement to be designated as Public Drainage and Utility Easement. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Plat Number: 63 Created: 8/30/2006 Pace N [8/30/06] Label width of utility easements. Minimum widths for water mains and sanitary sewers are: Water mains - 10 feet each side of main (20 feet total) San sewers - 15 feet each side of sewer (30 feet total) Curb stops and fire hydrants must also be within easements. Response: Easements provided. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Stormwater- Drainage Easements Number: 14 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 Off -site drainage easements are needed for the construction of drainage improvements on the LSI property to the north and on the Paragon property to the south. Ditch company signature will be needed for the routing of the irrigation pipes through the site. Please clearly label these pipes as irrigation lines. Response: Easements for offsite are in progress and status to be provided. irrigation water lines to be labeled and signature block to be added for review and approval by Warren Lake/Larimer Canal No2. Topic: Stormwater- Grading Number: 22 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Please provide detailed grading at final showing how the flows from the mobile home park site will be diverted to the north. Provide spillway design. Pond D spillway should be designed to direct overflow to the north There is grading shown on off -site properties, these will necessitate easements. Response: Inlet provided on site to intercept the off -site runoff. Grading to remain on site and detailed at west boundary with grading cross sections. Spillway details provided. Topic: Stormwater- Hydraulic Modeling Number: 17 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The detention ponds modeled are shown in series however no dynamic modeling was done for these ponds at preliminary level. Though it is acceptable to model these ponds at final, please be aware that this could entail a significant redesign of these ponds at final if they do not function properly. As long as the uppermost pond's size can potentially be adjusted once modeling is provided, this issue can be dealt at final plan submittal. At final when modeling the release rates from the ponds from this site on the west side of Harmony and into the HP swale, the hydraulic modeling should take into account tail water conditions. Response: Modeling provided in drainage study. Topic: Stormwater- Offsite flows Number: 26 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 Please extend the storm line that will bring flows from the development to the southwest through this site. Model should take into account off- site flows. Easements should be extended for such a line to the property line. Response: Offsite development runoff included in Drainage Study. pogo 9 Topic: Stormwater- Storm line maintenance responsibility Number: 30 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] We need to discuss who will be responsible for storm lines maintenance when the line goes from being in the right of way into the privately owned lines. Response: Will schedule meeting to discuss. (To be addressed at FCP) Topic: Stormwater- Utility Plans Number: 23 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 At final please provide storm sewer profiles and 100 year HGL. Since no vertical design was given at this point, potential conflicts cannot be checked but there are several areas where storm crossings are at shallow angles, please try to cross other utilities at close to a 90 degree angle whenever possible. Response: The storm profiles are provided and include HGL. All storm pipes should be identified with size and type on the overall utility plans. Inlets need to be identified. Manholes should be labeled. Response: Storm pipe is profiled on plans. Provide a legend. Response: Legend included. Where does the line that is paralleling Harmony Road extend to ? Please show off -site portion. Response: Offsite plans will show profiles and relative location. There are lots of storm lines shown that do not correspond to the latest grading, line work needs to be cleaned up. Response: Grading and storm pipe design cleaned up. Whys is the storm line in the pad at the southwest corner of Ziegler and the HP campus entrance (outparcels H1 and H2) being installed with these plans ? Response: Storm line from SW updated Label the proposed irrigation lines as such to differentiate form storm lines. Response: Profiles of irrigation lines called out to differentiate from storm lines. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 15 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29106) Label all water main valves, fittings and appurtenances, and label lengths of water main between valves, fittings, etc. Response: Comment noted, done Number: 16 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Move the 8-inch water main that extends from the private drive to the SE corner of the supercenter to the east as noted on the plans. Response: Waterline updated Number: 18 Created: 8/29/2006 Page 10 [8/29/06] Curb stops must be in easements, and meter pits must be within 2 feet of the curb stops. Response: Done Number: 19 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] At locations where sewers are dead ending, the manholes may be moved back to the last service to reduce sewer length (with the exception of at the north and west boundaries of the project). Response: Comment noted, done. Number: 20 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/061 Label sizes of all water/sewer services and fire lines. Response: Comment noted, done Number: 21 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] 1 have a meeting scheduled with PFA Thursday PM to review hydrant locations and will add notes on the reclined utility plans. Response: Comment noted, done Number: 24 Created: 8/29/2006 (8/29/061 Standard details for water meters have been updated. Use current details. (Is there really a 3 or 4-inch service planned? Fees are quite high.) Response: Water taps are 2" taps except as noted on plans. Modified detail provided on plan. Number: 25 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Show irrigation taps on the utility plans. Response: Comment noted to be added. Number: 27 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] The 24-inch water main in Ziegler is cathodically protected. Add note regarding isolation at point of connection. Show all CP test stations and add note to protect in place. If any test stations need to be moved, add note to contact Water Utility for assistance. Response: Comment noted, done. Number: 29 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] See plans for other comments. Response: Comment noted. Number: 73 Created: 8/31/2006 [8/31/06] Per discussions with PFA and Tony Willkomm, revise,the fire hydrant locations as noted on Sheet C-185 of the utility plans. Response: Comment noted. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 3 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/231061 Note #5 on sheet 1 of 10 should be amended to reflect what Section 3.5.1(1)(2) states. Specifically, the code states that mechanical equipment must be screened from "...adjacent properties and public streets." i'aae 1 I Transportation Services Engineering Department February 11, 2005 Mr. Darrell Bovee, Vice President of Design and Construction Bayer Properties Incorporated 2222 Arlington Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 RE: Summit Traffic Calming in English Ranch Dear Darrell: Attached are sketches of various traffic calming measures that were studied for the English Ranch Neighborhood. In addition, enclosed are cost estimates for the individual components that comprise each of the traffic calming options and the designs for these components. This information was used in determining the $75,181.00 contribution towards traffic calming in the neighborhood. These discussions occurred early in the planning process for The Summit. Please let me know of any questions or concerns. Sincerely, M . Virata, P.E. Civil Engineer I1 cc Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager Ron Phillips, Transportation Services Director Greg Byrne, Community Planning and Environmental Services Director Don Bachman, Transportation Services Policy and Budget Manager Bruce Hendee — bha design Carolynne µ nite — Brownstein Hyatt & Farber 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6605 • FAX (970) 221-6378 www.fcgov.com Response: Will coordinate with BHA. Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted (To be addressed at FCP) Number: 4 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] Please label the loading/delivery areas for the various buildings so that we can see how they will function (i.e. how easy can semis and other delivery trucks access those rt-:uS) Response: Will coordinate with BHA. Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted Number: 5 Created: 8/23/2006 (8/23/061 Where is the bike parking for the home improvement building? Response: Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted (To be addressed at FCP) Number: 6 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] The elevation drawings show "large format banners". They appear to be taller than 7'. They are considered to be wall signs, and the code limits them to 7' in height (Sec. 3.8.7(I) of the LUC). Response: Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted (To be addressed at FCP) Number: 7 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] 1 find the plat difficult to figure out. Is the whole development really only 1 lot? That's what it looks like. Response: Lots have been added and plat revised. Number: 8 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] Lot lines should be shown and labeled on the site plan. Distances from buildings to lot lines should be shown where possible. For instance, how far is Target from the north lot line? Response: Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted Number: 9 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/061 If there are screen walls at the loading areas, please provide some detail - how high, what material - and label them on the site plan. Response: Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted Number: 10 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] Note #7 on sheet 1 of 10 refers to trash durnpsters. But I don't see any shown on the site plan. If there are dumpster/enclosures proposed, please show and label. Response: Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted Number: 11 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] Please show the location of parking lot light poles. Response: Comment noted see site plan. Number: 12 Created: 8/23/2006 [8/23/06] The landscape plan includes a "representative plant list", but none of the plantings are labeled. The plan needs to label what the different trees and shrubs are so we know what is being installed. Response: Refer to BHA responses. Comment noted Pagc 12 Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Chief Planner CHRISTOPHER HUFFMAN DIRECT DIAL: (205) 795-4185 FACSIMILE: (205) 7954164 E-MAIL: CHUFFMAN@BAYERPROPERTIES.COM December 1, 2006 Ted Shepard City of Ft. Collins Current Planning Office 281 N. College Avenue Ft. Collins, CO 80521 RE: Front Range Village - Ziegler Road ROW Acquisition Progress Dear Ted: We have made significant progress in acquiring owner right of way along Ziegler Road for the purpose of constructing a standard four -lane arterial street. Please see the below status update per the Condition 5I of the September 21, 2006 PDP approval. Dietz Property (4105 Ziegler Road, Ft. Collins, CO 80525) • Eric Mallory and I met with Donette Fox, Larry Fox and Douglas Dietz regarding the acquisition of Ziegler Road ROW at the east boundary of their property. Attached is our proposal to acquire the needed ROW dated November 8, 2006. We have not concluded these negotiations but do not anticipate any significant issues. 2. Young Property (4109 Ziegler Road, Ft. Collins, CO 80525) • Eric Mallory and I met with Eunice and David Young regarding the acquisition of Ziegler Road ROW at the east boundary of their property. Attached is our proposal to acquire the needed ROW dated November 8, 2006. We have not concluded these negotiations but do not anticipate any significant issues. LSI Logic, Inc. (ROW at east boundary of the 27.67 acre parcel north of the FRV site) • Our purchase agreement with LSI for the 58.5 acre Parcel C requires that the buyer and the seller shall use good faith efforts to agree upon certain covenants required for the project. The acquisition of the LSI ROW along Ziegler shall be listed as such a covenant. David Silverstein and Eric Mallory have a meeting set for December 4, 2006 with LSI in San Jose, CA to finalize the purchase agreement. We anticipate acquiring the LSI parcel on or before February 2, 2007. 4. Paragon (located at the NW corner of the intersection of Harmony Road and Ziegler Road) • We are negotiating a Reciprocal Easement Agreement with Paragon where, in addition to other dedicated easements, the acquisition of ROW along Ziegler will be included. 5. Avago (located along the east side of Ziegler Road and north of Harmony Road) • Stantec Consulting, as a representative of Bayer Properties, met with Paragon on November 1, 2006 to discuss the acquisition of ROW along Ziegler. (Attached are meeting minutes.) We do not anticipate any significant issues with this acquisition. If you have any questions or need additional information please call me at (205) 795-4185. Sincerely, BAYER PROPERTIES, L.L.C. Christopher Huffman Associate Pre -Development Manager CC: No Text No Text No Text No Text 1 No Text English Ranch Neighborhood Conceptual Traffic Calming Devise Cost Estimate June 13, 2003 Stop Sign (installed) - $100 ea Turn Restricting Island - $3,600 ea • Raised center island • Hardscaped Chicanes - $12,000 ea • 11 ft wide x 62.5 ft long • Irrigated • Landscaped • Cost based on 7 chicanes per each %" water tap With 14 chicanes shown to be installed on Kinsley Drive, a 2" mill and inlay is recommended at an additional cost of $90,000. Intersection Choker — $12,000 ea • 6 ft wide x 30 ft long • Irrigated • Landscaped • Cost based on 2 chokers per each %" water tap Neighborhood Entryway Median - $2,600 ea • 6 ft wide x 15 ft long • Raised center island • Hardscaped • Sign cost not included in estimate Raised Asphalt Crosswalk Removal — $1,800 ea Mini -Roundabout - $82,000 ea • 36 ft center island diameter • Irrigated and landscaped center island • 4 hardscaped splitter islands • 8 ft drive over truck apron • Curb, gutter and sidewalk reconstruction • Asphalt pavement reconstruction • %" water tap • ROW for sidewalk relocation is not included in estimated cost These costs are based on design performed In -House with the indicated features on the attached drawings. No utility or conflict contingency is included. Transportation Services Engineering Department March 31, 2005 Mr. Darrell Bovee, Vice President of Design and Construction Bayer Properties Incorporated 2222 Arlington Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 RE: The Summit Front Range — Trail Connection to English Ranch — Discussion Between Bruce Hendee and Dan Bartran Dear Darrell: This letter is a follow-up to a previous letter dated February 11, 2005 entitled "The Summit Front Range — Trail Connection to English Ranch — Acquisition of Easement" as well as recent discussion we are aware of from Bruce Hendee with BHA Design and Dan Bartran of Bartran Homes. As this trail connection to the English Ranch Subdivision is perhaps one of the larger issues remaining with the project, it is hoped that there is general consensus on the status of the issue. This previous letter underscores our concern that Bayer should be actively pursuing a connection into the English Ranch Neighborhood as this legal right must be obtained prior to sign off on the construction plans and before any construction can take place. We do not know if Bayer has formerly approached land owners in the area to begin formal negotiations but given the potential complexities these negotiations can entail, we hope that such negotiations have started, or will take place shortly. We are aware that Bruce Hendee has had discussions with Dan Bartran regarding the obtaining of an easement either through English Ranch Homeowners Association property as one option for the connection, or through unplatted property owned by Dan Bartran as a second option. Bruce had recently expressed concern to Cameron Gloss that the first option requires approval of the English Ranch HOA, which Bruce noted only meets once a year in December. Cameron Gloss did follow-up with Dan Bartran on this issue and Dan indicated to Cameron that per the bylaws of the HOA, the Board can convene a special meeting with a three week advance notice in order to discuss and vote on an issue such as the easement needed for this connection. With that information in mind, we believe a meeting with the Board can occur within a timely manner. Bruce expressed additional concern that the second option is not viable as a design alternative as LSI will not grant the construction of a temporary pedestrian trail on their property, (which the connection into property owned by Dan Bartran would need to pass through). Before this connection is discounted, we would like to receive written confirmation from LSI stating this is their position. Should the City Council be placed in a position to exercise its eminent domain authority in securing a connection (as outlined 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6605 • FAX (970) 221-6378 www.fcgov.com y M in Council Resolution 2001-40, attached to the aforementioned February 11 letter) verification of LSI's position will help in justifying Section 1(c) & (d) of the Resolution. Bruce Hendee also inquired about waiving the connection requirement to English Ranch in light of the sidewalk construction along the frontage of Ziegler Road. The required sidewalk improvements and connections Bruce refers to on Ziegler Road are part of the streetscape improvements to Ziegler Road. The City considers the street to include vehicular lanes, bike lanes, and pedestrian facilities all as integral parts of the road. These improvements are part of the developer mitigating his impact on the surrounding area, and do not address the need for the interim trail connection to English Ranch. As noted in the letter dated September 30, 2004, entitled "Summit Off -site Trail to English Ranch" three reasons were outlined justifying the construction of the trail, one of which noted satisfying "level of service requirements for connectivity into the English Ranch Neighborhood". To have this connection occur two -thousand feet east does not provide a direct route for pedestrians. It is unrealistic to assume residents in English Ranch will walk two - thousand feet east to Ziegler Road to use the sidewalk system and then traverse back two - thousand feet west along Paddington Road. Since the plans for the project indicated the trail connection would be more centrally located off of Corbett Drive, a request to have the Ziegler Road sidewalk connection suffice in lieu of this trail connection would require the submittal of a major amendment to the development plan, altering the alignment. This major amendment would then have to go before the Planning and Zoning Board for a hearing and approval. We hope this response to Bruce's inquiry leaves little doubt on the importance of the temporary trail to English Ranch being direct and not along Ziegler Road. Please keep us informed of the progress in acquiring the legal right to construct the trail connection across English Ranch property. Also, please keep in mind the provisions of Council Resolution 200140, should Bayer contend that they are unable to negotiate any connection to English Ranch. Again, as per our previous letter dated February 11, 2005, we would make ourselves available during a discussion between Bayer and the land owner for which the trail connection would cross. Sincerely, rar-o4,-P�.Zirata,-P.E. Civil Engineer II cc: Diane Jones, Deputy City Manager Ron Phillips, Transportation Services Director Greg Byrne, Community Planning and Environmental Services Director Don Bachman, City Engineer Cameron Gloss, Current Planning Director Mark Jackson, Transportation Planning Manager Ted Shepard, Chief Planner Bruce Hendee — bha design Carolynne White — Brownstein Hyatt & Farber 0 Stannic Consulting Inc 209 South Meldrum Street Fort Collins CO 80521-2603 Tel:(970) 482-5922 Fax:(970) 482-636B stanw.com ct Stantec August 17, 2006 City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Attention: Mr. Gary Diede, Acting City Engineer Reference: Front Range Village Variance Request for Width and Radius of Commercial Driveway Dear Mr. Diede This letter is application for a variance request to the width and curb return radii of a commercial driveway approach under the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LUCASS) for the private driveway connecting to the rear building access in the above referenced project. This variance is being requested as part of the final public improvements construction plans as requested by City staff. 1. Identifying Issue: The standard requested to be modified is the Width of a Commercial Approach (LUCASS 9.3.8.A) and Curb Return Radii (LUCASS 8.2.9.A) for the private driveway located on the east side of Corbett Drive near the northerly terminus of Corbett Drive. Per LUCASS, the maximum permitted width of a commercial drive approach is 36 feet wide (without an island) measured at the back of sidewalk and the curb return radii for a high volume driveway is 15 feet. LUCASS Drawing 707 indicates that commercial driveways wider than 36 feet shall be divided with a median not less than 6' wide. Due to the need to accommodate larger vehicles for the delivery and unloading of goods at the rear of the retail buildings, a larger curb return radius is needed (see attached exhibit) for the indicated driveways. It should be noted that the actual drive aisle width for the driveway west driveway 35 feet wide and the east driveway is 30 feet wide. These are within the maxiniuni allowable width per LUCASS- However, the large curb return radii is needed to accommodate the movements of a WB-67 truck makes the width at the back of sidewalk larger than the maximum 36 feet allowed per code. 2. Proposing Alternate Design: The proposed alternative design is to provide 35 foot curb return radii for the both east and west driveways at the intersection with Corbett Drive as shown on the attached exhibit. The width of the driveway at the back of sidewalk (right- of-way) will be 41.34 foot wide on the west driveway and 37.4 foot wide on the east August 17, 2006 Mr. Gary Diede, Acting City Engineer Page 2 of 2 Reference: Front Range Village driveway. The exhibit depicts the vehicle path for the turning movements of a WB-67 truck which is the largest vehicle anticipated to provide delivery service to the retail center. Based on the turning path analysis of the WB-67 truck, placing a 6' wide median would not be practical for this service aisle as it would impede the ability of the large trucks to make the necessary turning movement without driving over the top of the median so a median is not proposed in the design. In addition, the driveway width is 30 feet and 35 feet wide, only the opening due to the larger curb return radii exceeds the 36 feet of width which requires a median. 3. Comparing to Standards: The variance request, if granted, would increase the width of the driveway opening and enlarge the curb return radii in an area that accesses the load/unload zones for the retail center. Increasing the curb return radius from 15' to 35' will enable the WB-67 delivery vehicles to make the turn into the service aisle behind the building without running over the landscaping/utilities/sidewalk outside of the driveway area. The larger radii and width will also enable the delivery vehicles to make the turn quicker and reduce any impacts to the traffic flow on Corbett Drive. There are no identified impacts to the City for capital and maintenance costs created by this request. 4. Justification: It is the applicants opinion that granting this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Further this variance will not reduce the design life of the roadway nor cause the City of Fort Collins additional maintenance costs. It is the applicant's opinion that the granting of this variance will advance the public purpose of the driveway width standards equally well to the current standard in LUCASS. The larger curb return radii will improve the ability of delivery vehicles to access the load/unload zones behind the retail center in a safe and efficient manner without having to backup or make other unsafe movements in the public street system. Your consideration of this request is greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter in more detail, please feel free to call. Sincerely, STAFEC CONSULTING INC. 4ntho . Willkomm, P.E. Project Engineer Tel: 970-482-5922 Fax: 970-482-6368 a w i l l k o m m@ sta n to c. c o m c. Christopher Huffman, Bayer Properties ¢\52870Factive\187010251\manaBementlletter_memos\drivew y radius variance request 081706 doc staniec.com Transmittal Stantec Inc. 209 South Meldrum Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Tel: (303) 482-5922 Fax: (303) 482-6368 Starrtec To: Marc Virata Company: Stantec Address: City of Fort Collins Engineering Phone: Date: August 30, 2006 File: trans Delivery: Delivery From: Tony Willkomm ❑ For Your Information ®' For Your Approval ❑ For Your Review ❑ As Requested Reference: Front Range Village Variance Request with Exhibit A Enclosed with transmittal is a copy of the Variance Request for Front Range Village. The previous Transmittal did not have the attached Exhibit A three (3) pages. Please circulate to Gary Diede for his review. Thank you, STANTEC INC. Ton illkomm Senior Design Engineer Tel: 970-482-5922 Fax:970-482-6368 awilikomm@stantec;.com Attachment: Letter and Exhibits Stamec Consulting Inc. 209 South Meldrum Street Fort Collins CO 80521.2603 Tel: (970) 482-5922 Fax: (970) 482-6368 stantec.com $tantK August 17, 2006 City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Attention: Mr. Gary Diede, Acting City Engineer Reference: Front Range Village Variance Request for Width and Radius of Commercial Driveway Dear Mr. Diede: This letter is application for a variance request to the width and curb return radii of a commercial driveway approach under the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LUCASS) for the private driveway connecting to the rear building access in the above referenced project. This variance is being requested as part of the final public improvements construction plans as requested by City staff. 1. Identifying Issue: The standard requested to be modified is the Width of a Commercial Approach (LUCASS 9.3.8.A) and Curb Return Radii (LUCASS 8.2.9.A) for the private driveway located on the east side of Corbett Drive near the northerly terminus of Corbett Drive. Per LUCASS, the maximum permitted width of a commercial drive approach is 36 feet wide (without an island) measured at the back of sidewalk and the curb return radii for a high volume driveway is 15 feet. LUCASS Drawing 707 indicates that commercial driveways wider than 36 feet shall be divided with a median not less than 6' wide. Due to the need to accommodate larger vehicles for the delivery and unloading of goods at the rear of the retail buildings, a larger curb return radius is needed (see attached exhibit) for the indicated driveways. It should be noted that the actual drive aisle width for the driveway west driveway 35 feet wide and the east driveway is 30 feet wide. These are within the maximum allowable width per LUCASS. However, the large curb return radii is needed to accommodate the movements of a WB-67 truck makes the width at the back of sidewalk larger than the maximum 36 feet allowed per code. 2. Proposing Alternate Design: The proposed alternative design is to provide 35 foot curb return radii for the both east and west driveways at the intersection with Corbett Drive as shown on the attached exhibit. The width of the driveway at the back of sidewalk (right- of-way) will be 41.34 foot wide on the west driveway and 37.4 foot wide on the east Stantec August 17, 2006 Mr. Gary Diede, Acting City Engineer Page 2 of 2 Reference: Front Range Village driveway. The exhibit depicts the vehicle path for the turning movements of a WB-67 truck which is the largest vehicle anticipated to provide delivery service to the retail center. Based on the turning path analysis of the WB-67 truck, placing a 6' wide median would not be practical for this service aisle as it would impede the ability of the large trucks to make the necessary turning movement without driving over the top of the median so a median is not proposed in the design. In addition, the driveway width is 30 feet and 35 feet wide, only the opening due to the larger curb return radii exceeds the 36 feet of width which requires a median. 3. Comparing to Standards: The variance request, if granted, would increase the width of the driveway opening and enlarge the curb return radii in an area that accesses the load/unload zones for the retail center. Increasing the curb return radius from 15' to 35' will enable the WB-67 delivery vehicles to make the turn into the service aisle behind the building without running over the landscaping/utilities/sidewalk outside of the driveway area. The larger radii and width will also enable the delivery vehicles to make the turn quicker and reduce any impacts to the traffic flow on Corbett Drive. There are no identified impacts to the City for capital and maintenance costs created by this request. 4. Justification: It is the applicants opinion that granting this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Further this variance will not reduce the design life of the roadway nor cause the City of Fort Collins additional maintenance costs. It is the applicant's opinion that the granting of this variance will advance the public purpose of the driveway width standards equally well to the current standard in LUCASS. The larger curb return radii will improve the ability of delivery vehicles to access the load/unload zones behind the retail center in a safe and efficient manner without having to backup or make other unsafe movements in the public street system. Your consideration of this request is greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter in more detail, please feel free to call. Sincerely, STA TEC CONSULTING INC. nthony illkomm, P.E. Project nglneer Tel: 970-482-5922 Fax:970-482-6368 awillkomm@stantee.com c. Christopher Huffman, Bayer Properties v 62B701Nc1ive1187010251M nagemen[Mel[er_memsdriveway radius variance request 091706.tlac HOMEIMPROVEMENT REAR DRIVEWAY WEST 0' 0 30 45 60 1:30 sInMIC r 'MI I 01,114 209 South Meltlmm FL Collins, CO 80521-2603 Te1:19701 4825 22 REAR DRIVEWAY EAST 0' BAYER PROPERTIES INC. FRONT RANGE VILLAGE 187010251 cc. EX -A �,I[-T _. 5 N\528]01\active\18]010251\Prellminory\8rowings\civil\erbibils\Vononce 0—v Aibil d, 8/31/2006 2'.20.52 PM HOMEIMPROVEMENT REAR DRIVEWAY WEST 0 30 45 60 1:30 rntmz wl I roll! South Mteldrum Ft Te Collins, CO. 80621-2603 Fax (9 0 4132-63 8 Syay�. Fax:(970) ao.com 8 i YC 1 .)epeelR WWW.616IIIBG.COm n I j 1 D 4'\528)0f\oclive\187010251\preliminary\drawings\ceAibll.dwg 8/31/2W8 2,21 Cl PM w 0 F— F- w m O U i 1r r io o; Iv,b �. - „,a FI 3s -o� 0 Wia�n .1 for Irn.-� i,.. e- l.I�k rro MIN. RAD. 41.0' BAYER PROPERTIES INC. FRONT RANGE VILLAGE 187010251 pF<HM6 tic EX —A 11 CI i _ I I I W REAR DRIVEWAY EAST W m - U 1,00 1r 3C J0i I- _G -(,, 0 30 45 60 i:30 I ` _ .� ©s ,tea I. o0 MIN. RAD. 41.0' OPYRINIT 1M15 wnmT - NIS or 11 m, .,. I m- , n.r- a LLa un r` 209 South Meldmm Fl. Collins CO. 8M21-M03 Tel:(970) 4825922 C. 187010251 EX -A I'lll_, BAYER PROPERTIES INC. FRONT RANGE VILLAGE r µ't K01 �F� etamaccan -ocr mxwr. ""' EXH6BITA a =� ��-r,5 EAST DRIVEWAY TRUCK PATH _ V:\sza➢01\active\18)010251\p,eLminarY\tl,awings\null\e�M1lbds\Vu, nnce D,he eAib,t,d, 8/31/2006 2:21.30 PIA Diagonal Diverter at Kingsley Drive and Paddington Road - $40,000 ea • 10 ft wide x 72 ft long • 3 ft tall concrete planter • Irrigated and landscaped • W water tap • Utility manholes and valve boxes could be in direct conflict with this diverter application and costs for relocation are not included AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT ITEM NUMBER: 30 DATE: December 5, 2006 STAFF: Darin Aiteberry Mike Freeman Chuck Seest Resolution 2006-126 Approving an Agreement Between the City and Front Range Retail Company to Provide Financial Assistance for the Front Range Village. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City staff has been negotiating diligently with Front Range Retail Company to develop an incentive agreement that will assist in ensuring the development known as "Front Range Village", a retail and commercial development totaling 910,000 square feet. The development is located on approximately 100 acres at the cross roads of Harmony and Ziegler roads in southeast Fort Collins. Front Range Village is the first significant retail project the City has seen in many years. This development is regionally significant and will help the City bolster retail trade activity that has eroded over the past five years with the coming of regional retail competition and the decline in Fort Collins specific retail venues. The proposed Financial Assistance Agreement is based the following philosophy: 1. incentives should be based on project need. 2. The developers should have the ability to achieve a reasonable rate of return. 3. incentives should be performance driven. 4. Sales tax share back should be minimized to the extent possible. The total incentive agreement is $22,000,000, with the vast majority of these funds being generated by a Public Improvement Fee (PIF), which is an optional sales fee levied by the developer on the retail sales at the development. The anticipated total net present value (today's dollars) of the Public Improvement Fee is $18,500,000. The remaining $3,500,000 comes from sales tax share back ($1,500,000) and fiom Transportation Improvement reimbursements ($2,000,000) to offset major transportation improvements related to this project on Harmony Road and Ziegler Road. ►'- December 5, 2006 -2- Itom No. 30 The Front Range Village retail center will generate $2,200,000 in not new sales taxes to the City on an annual basis following the full first year ofoperations. Ofthat amount, $1,600,000 is unrestricted general fund dollars to be allocated to City Council priorities. The remaining $600,000 is allocated in equal amounts to Open Space, Building on Basics, and Transportation improvements related to dedicated sales tax funding streams. BACKGROUND The City ofFort Collins is projecting that sales and use taxes will continue to grow over the coming one to three years, but at a much lower rate of growth then had been seen in the past. It is projected that, without significant retail development, overall sales taxes will grow in the 1 % to 2% range from 2007 through 2009. With the net new sales tax generated by the Front Range Village, the City will see a 4% increase in overall sales taxes (in addition to the I % to 2% already projected) beginning in 2008. It has been a priority of the City to pursue additional retail sales opportunities through new retail development and through redevelopment which is outlined in the City's economic action plan. City staff engaged Economic Planning Systems in Denver to assist in the analysis of the Front Range Village and to advise on the overall net new sales taxes generated. Staff and EPS evaluated the overall project and developed the Financial Assistance recommendation for City Council consideration. PROJECT COSTS Project Costs Land Costs $17,992,811 Hard Costs $62,668,540 • Onsite improvements • OPfsite improvements • Building shells • Tenant allowances • Signs Soft Costs $34,780,505 • Development fees • Impact fees • Sales and use taxes • Financing expenses • Overhead expenses • Marketing expenses • Appraisal expenses • Interest expenses • Engineerimglarchitecture fees Total Project Costs . I115 31836 December 5, 2006 -3- item No. 30 PROJECT REVENUES 10 Year Revenue Summary No Assistance .75% PIF&omtives Gross Revenue $99,500,000 $131,000,000 DETAILS ON PROPOSED INCENTIVES Public Improvement Fee The incentive agreement allows the developer to impose up to a .75% PIF on retail sales on the lessees involved in Front Range Village. The PIF generates S 18,500,000 in total revenues on a net present value basis (today's dollars). The City will collect the PIF fees and remit then to the developer. Sales Tax Share Back The City will remit to the developer up to $1,500,000 in sales taxes on a net present value basis (today's dollars) generated by the Front Range Village. These sales tax share back payments will be contingent upon the developer constructing and operating at least 550,000 square feet of retail shopping and those retail shops generating and remitting sales tax revenue to the City. If all contingencies are satisfied, the sales tax share back will be made in three payments approximately twelve months apart. If the developer fails to meet the contingency requirements for any particular payment, the City will not be obligated to make that payment. Transportation Improvement Costs The City will also remit $2,000,000 to the developer to offset a portion of the cost of the developer's share of the significant transportation improvements relating to this project. The City will pay these funds from dollars provided the City by the Colorado Department of Transportation for long-term maintenance and improvements for Harmony Road. OVERALL BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS The construction and operation of the Front Range Village Center will provide significant overall benefits to the community. These benefits include: 1. An overall increase in net new sales taxes of 4%. 2. Increases of $600,000 overall in dedicated sales taxes for open space, transportation and Building on Basics. 3. Provision of shopping opportunities in southeast Fort Collins to address sales tax leakage occurring in that part of the community. 4. Major transportation improvements will be realized along the Harmony corridor and along Ziegler Road. Stantec Consulting Inc. 209 South Meldrum Street Fort Collins CO 80521-2603 Tel (970) 482-5922 Fax (970) 482-6368 stantec.Com 1" January 30, 2007 Development Review Dept. City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 Attention: Ted Shepard Reference: Front Range Village — City Plan Review Comments Stantec Project# 187010251 This letter is in response to Staff Review Comments for the Civil Plan Sets for the Front Range Village project. Our responses are shown in bold text below your comments. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Drawings Created: 8/29/2006 Number: 31 [1/5/071 Just a concern that this doesn't look apparent for the private drive connecting out to Ziegler. [8/29/061 Please ensure that concrete is used at all driveway intersections with public streets (Corbett and Ziegler). Response: Concrete has been added to all driveway approaches that enter Public road ROW. Number: 41 Created: 8/29/2006 [1/5/07] This was resolved but now occurs in a new location further east along Harmony Road [C-178 & 1931. There is also another instance of this shown on the northwest corner of Ziegler and Harmony [C-177 & 1921. [8/29/06] An inlet is shown on the northeast corner of the Corbett Drive and Harmony Road that sits in conflict with the sidewalk along Harmony Road. Response: The inlet and sidewalk have been adjusted so they are no longer in conflict with each other. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 2 of 18 Number: 114 Created: 1 /5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-112] More design information needs to be shown on the ped connection into English Ranch, providing a design showing physical connection into an existing sidewalk system, showing where exactly this takes place (legal information on parcel ownership), and grading information. Response: Additional survey has been obtained in order to provide a full design and physical connection to the existing walk in English Ranch via the LSI and Bartran property. See sheet C-112 for horizontal and vertical design of this connection. We have also identified the necessary offsite easements on the Plat to accommodate this connection. These easements will be created by separate document. Copies of the sketches of description for the easements are attached. Number: 115 Created: 1 /5/2007 [1/5/071 [C-120] The specifying of a particular pavement thickness for areas within public right-of-way needs to be removed. This will be determined with the final pavement design report. Response: The references to a design pavement thickness for pavement improvements within public ROW have been removed from sheet C-120. Number: 116 Created: 1 /5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-171-1731 Offsite grading and drainage easements are needed before sign off on the plans from the LSI property directly northeast for the work shown. Response: offsite easement sketches have been prepared, and are attached for your review. Number: 117 Created: 1 /5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-173] The driveway out to Ziegler exceeds our 750 sq. ft. rule of area draining over a sidewalk. Please look at adjusting grades or provide inlets behind the Ziegler sidewalk. Note that there's a general lack of spot elevation information on this and other driveway locations. Response: Inlets have been added to intercept flow prior to flowing out to Ziegler. Number: 118 Created: 1 /5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-177] The grading of a berm along Harmony Road appears to be in conflict of installing the sidewalk along Harmony in meeting maximum cross slope grade for a sidewalk. Response: The berms along Harmony Road have been revised to accommodate the sidewalks with the maximum 2% cross slope. Number: 119 Created: 1 /5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-275] The road design information shown on this sheet doesn't appear to match the intersection detail sheet information on C-291 of the offsite plan set. Spot elevations and slope information don't match. Response: The profiles have been revised to show the extents of the median. Number: 120 Created: 1 /5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-275 & 2761 The median profile information doesn't appear to show the full median. Response: The profiles have been revised to show the extents of the median. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 3 of 18 Number: 121 Created: 1/5/2007 [1 /5/07] [C-506] This detail sheet shows the standard CDOT pavement joint detail, is this intended for the roundabout internal to the site? If so, a note should be added to [C-299] specifying this. Response: Yes, the detail on C-506 is intended to be used in conjunction with the detail on C-299. A note has been added to sheet C-299 that references the detail on sheet C-506. Topic: General Number: 78 Created: 9/1 /2006 [1/5/07] This was apparently not addressed. [9/1/06] Please ensure that an access easement is shown along a private drive alignment west of the roundabout along Corbett connecting to the western boundary of the site to tie into the property in front of the mobile home park. Response: An access easement has been added to the private drive along the north boundary of the out -parcels from the mobile home park to Paragon. Number: 79 Created: 9/1 /2006 [1/5/07] This was apparently not addressed. (It is shown correctly on C-121 of the construction drawings but not on the plat). [9/1/06] An access and transit easement needs to be dedicated for the private drive that connects Corbett to Ziegler Road. Response: An access and transit easement has been added to the Plat along the Private Drive from Corbett to Ziegler Road. Number: 143 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Provide standard truncated domes details on the detail sheets of both plan sets. Response: Standard truncated dome details have been added to the onsite plan set as sheet # C-506. Number: 144 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] The landscape plan does not reflect the use of landscaping for the medians along Harmony Road. If this is intended, please provide the information on the landscape plan set. The off -site construction drawing plan set should then show water tap extensions as well. Response: The landscaping for the medians on Harmony Road are part of the off site plan set. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 147 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Please see redlines for additional comments, scanability concerns, etc. Response: The redline plan comments and scanability concerns have been addressed and the changes are reflected in the current plan set. Topic: Off -site construction plans Number: 122 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Please label this plan set Front Range Village - Harmony Road and Ziegler Road. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 4 of 18 Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 123 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Based upon information shown on the demo plan, it appears that Warren Lake and/or Larimer Canal No. 2 will need to sign the plan set. Response: The owner of the lateral is Warren Lake Irrigation Ditch Company. They have been contacted and are willing to sign off on the plans. We will obtain a letter from them stating that they have reviewed the plan set and have no objections. The letter will be provided to the City upon receipt. Number: 124 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-053, 057] Information seems to be missing based upon arrows pointing to no descript locations. Response: The demolition plans have been updated accordingly. Number: 125 Created: 1/5/2007 [1 /5/07] [C-056, 59] Signs are proposed to be protected in place though they appear to be within the street (or in an access ramp) and should be removed and relocated. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 126 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-150] Similar to the onsite roundabout, is the CDOT joint pattern detail applicable for the concrete intersection at Ziegler and Harmony, and should this be added to this particular plan set? Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 127 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] In general, the lane profile information should provide node points to help discern where proposed street grade changes occur. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 128 Created: 1/5/2007 [i/5/07] In general, the plan view on the street design sheets should be showing some vertical information with spot elevations, flow arrows, etc, these shouldn't be limited to the street intersection detail sheets (more information on the driveway intersections for example). Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 129 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Please label the flowline profiles as median flowline profiles to avoid confusion with the edge of pavement. On a related note, please ignore the redline questioning regarding 8% slopes. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Stantec January29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 5 of 18 Number: 130 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-206, 208, 217] There are several instances in which the street grade along Harmony is less than standard (.5%) and is combined with the cross slope of Harmony Road at these locations are less than standard in and below the 1.5% range. After further discussion at a meeting this morning, I'm understanding that the area directly west of Ziegler will be relooked at by Stantec while the City will discuss internally options. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 131 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-206, 2091 There are instances where vertical curves should be used due to grade changes that exceed .4% in a crest situation. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 132 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-220] As discussed at a meeting yesterday, please look at extending the concrete gutter line from the median to the area inlet on Harmony Road east of Ziegler. Show a flowline line to show how the water leaves the median and enters the inlet. Specify a transition from catch to spill curb. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 133 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-290-293] Please provide additional spot elevations at these street intersection detail sheets in accordance with LCUASS Details 7-27 and 7-28 and also indicate transition points as appropriate. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 134 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-219] This detail sheet shows information that doesn't match the cross section sheets as well as the onsite Corbett design drawings. 1 % cross slopes are shown when 2% is shown on the cross sections. Flow grades and spot elevations on don't match the Corbett profile information. It seems that if grades aren't meeting standards in locations, the splitter medians can be used to help compensate for the grade concerns. Response: The Corbett Drive cross -sections, grades, and profiles have been revised to accurately depict the correct cross slope of 2%. See Corbett Drive plan and profiles on sheets C-281 to C-285. Number: 135 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-313] Some of the cross -sections on this sheet should be reflecting splitter medians per the street design. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village —Response Letter Page 6 of 18 Number: 136 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] In general there are instances in which cross slope percentages aren't labeled. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 137 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] [C-317] The change in cross slope from positive to negative seems to occur quite abruptly between STA 158+50 and 159+00. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 138 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Please provide stationing information on the demo plan sheets. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 139 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Proposed contours need to be shown along with property lines at a scale to ascertain where offsite impacts are occurring. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 140 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Please show spot elevation/cross section information for the median splitter islands as verification that drainage will not pass through the access ramps rather than stay along the flowline of the islands. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 145 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Ensure that right-of-way is shown on both sides of the street on all cross sections as evidence of where construction falls outside of right-of-way. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Topic: Plat Number: 113 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/07] Cross access and parking easements are created with the plat. Is it intended that these are dedicated to the City? The parking easement in particular appears to be more of a private agreement and with the plat dedicating all easements to the City, this may not be the intended use. Perhaps these two easements can be defined in detail. Response: No, the easements in question are shown on the Plat as "by separate document." These easements are private and will be created by a separate easement agreement. Sketches of these easements have been enclosed for your review. These easements have also been defined in more detail on the Plat. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 7 of 18 Number: 141 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/071 Ensure that the plat provides an access easement along a pathway from Corbett Drive to the drive aisle connecting into the Pads at Harmony project. Response: An access easement has been added to the Plat to provide private access to the Pads at Harmony project from Corbett Drive ROW. Number: 142 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/071 Ensure that an access easement is provided for the private drive connecting Ziegler Road to Corbett Drive. Response: An access easement has been added to the Plat to provide private access from Corbett Drive to Ziegler Road via the Private Drive. Number: 146 Created: 1/5/2007 [1/5/071 Technical Services has the following comments: 1. Legal matches plat. Response: Comment Noted. 2. Plat closes and area closes. Response: Comment Noted. 3. Outer boundary must have monument at least at 1400'. Response: All property boundaries have been indicated on the Plat to be monumented at a distance not to exceed 1400 feet. 4. Lot lines are very confusion - use a heavier line for the lot line. Response: Lot lines have been revised to be more clear. 5. What is a cross access easement? Please define. Response: The cross access and parking easements with Paragon have been defined on the Plat. These easements will not be created by the Plat and are shown for reference purposes only. 6. How do lots 1-6 and additional lots get access from a legal standpoint. Access easements are needed. Response: Access easements have been added to the Plat along the North side of the outparcels. 7. The emergency access easements are not locatable. Response: The location of the emergency access easements have been identified on the Plat. 8. Scanning issues occur, see redlines. Response: All known scanning issues have been resolved with this plan set. 10. On tracts B & C is shows an easement on top of the same easement? Response: The easements on tracts B & C have been revised on the Plat for clarity. No Text Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 8 of 18 11. How were Harmony Road and Ziegler Road dedicated? Response: The proposed Harmony Rd. and Ziegler Rd. ROW will be dedicated to the City of Fort Collins by the Plat. This is now indicated on the Plat. 12. What is tract A, B, C, who owns and maintains? Response: The ownership and maintenance of the proposed tracts A, B, & C have been clarified on the Plat. These tracts will be owned and maintained by Front Range Retail Company, LLC. Topic: Site Plan Number: 37 Created: 8/29/2006 [1/5/07] Please ensure that more information is shown on the site plan showing English Ranch property ownership, physical existing conditions, etc. The site (and construction drawings) should represent how the design impacts the surrounding area. 18/29/06] The pedestrian connection shown somewhat on the site plan needs to be designed to the north showing a connecting sidewalk to the south side of Paddington. Response: Additional survey has been obtained in order to provide a full design and physical connection to the existing walk in English Ranch via the LSI and Bartran property. See sheet C-112 for horizontal and vertical design of this connection. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 56 Created: 8/30/2006 [1/3/07] [8/30/06] KNOX BOX: Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20 Response: A Knox Box will be provided on the front of every new building. A note has been added to the utility plan sheet C-185. Number: 59 Created: 8/30/2006 [1/3/07] This pertains specifically to the Lowe's Garden Center, and any other relative retailer that might apply. [8/30/06) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Toxic, corrosive, or reactive materials, or flammable/combustible liquids (as defined in the Uniform Fire Code) if used, stored, or handled on site, must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the Planning Department and the Fire Department. (What do you have? How much? How do you prevent it from being a public threat?) FCLUC3.4.5 Response: A note has been added to the Utility plan sheet C-185. Number: 60 Created: 8/30/2006 [1/3/07] [8/30/06] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. Response: A 6" fire line has been provided at each building that requires protection. A note has been added to the Utility plan sheet C-185. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 9 of 18 Number: 61 Created: 8/30/2006 [1/3/07] Per the Dec. 7 meeting with Stantec, Bayer and PFA, PFA requires emergency access to the rear of the buildings (the east -west drive aisle that runs behind Target and the north -south drive aisle that is west of buildings B-1 through B-5). These shall be added to the plat. [8/30/06] REQUIRED ACCESS: The Emergency Access Easements as shown on the submitted plat are acceptable. When constructed, the fire lanes shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. UFC901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 Response: An Emergency Access Easement behind all perimeter buildings has been added to our plan on sheet C121. Number: 96 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/3/07] LABELING: For consistency (and to make it easier on age 40-plus eyes), please label, with words, all fire hydrants, instead of just showing the hydrant symbol. Response: Labels for all fire hydrants have been added to utility plans C-121 & C-185, and are also called out on sheets C-186 to C-194. Number: 97 Created: 1 /3/2007 [1/3/07] CORRECTION: Sheet 9 shows two buildings labeled F-4. The F-4 building that is in the southeast corner should actually be F-6. Response: This has been revised. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: General Number:72 • Created:8/31/2006 [1/2/07] Some buildings (as an example, C-2 and the Super Target) still do not show bicycle parking. Please revise. [8/31/06] Bicycle Parking - general comment. This project is required to provide 170 bicycle parking spaces. As it is now, this is not reflected (in full) on the site or utility plans. This will equate to roughly 40 bicycle racks (depending on the chosen design) that need to be spread throughout the development. IF the applicant has a certain type of fixture in mind, they will need to check with Transportation Planning to ensure that the proposed rack will meet the requirements of the LUC. Response: As the front hardscape is being planned, we will meet with Transportation Planning to discuss locations of bicycle racks. Dispersion of bicycle parking throughout the site - for starters, a rack will have to be placed proximate to each store entrance that is in plain view, is secure, and is readily accessible for a customer arriving by bicycle. By my count, this will place about 25 of the required 40 racks. It goes without saying that the areas where bicycle parking is to be provided need to be hard surfaced and free of obstructions. Response: Comment noted. Bicycle racks are planned only for hard surfaces. We'll need to make sure there is plenty of bicycle parking available at the east and west ends of the Main Street portion of the private drive as well as proximate to the proposed library entrance. Response: We will work with Transportation Planning once the hardscape design is approved by the City. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 10 of 18 It would probably be a good idea for me to sit down for a brief meeting with the landscape architects to iron out the appropriate locations and quantities. Response: Agreed. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Drainage Plan Number: 87 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] Please provide a hydrologic summary table and pond summary tables on the plan. Response: These tables have been added to sheet C-151. Topic: Drainage Report Number: 95 Created: 1/2/2007 [1/2/07] Please provide street capacity calculations for the minor storm along Ziegler and Harmony, please note that for arterial streets, the minor storm is the 10 year storm and the allowable ponding, is not to exceed curb height or not to enter roadway along Harmony. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Please relate the manhole ID used in the UDSEWER run to the manhole numbering system used on the utility plans, through a reference table. Response: Manhole ID's have been added to the UD Sewer calculations cover sheets. Topic: Easements Number: 91 Created: 1/2/2007 [1/2/07] Please provide a drainage easement along the rear of the outparcel properties along Harmony to allow future owners to connect to outflow pipe located on neighboring lots. Response: A drainage easement has been added along the rear of the outparcels to provide for stormwater conveyance and pipe connection for future systems. Topic: Erosion Control Plan Number: 85 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] Please use sediment traps at the detention pond outlets. Response: Sediment traps have been added to the detention pond outlets as shown on sheets C-173 and C-176. Please specify how high the soil stock piles shown on the plans will be. Response: See note on sheet C-145 for height of stock piles. Topic: Grading Plans Number: 89 Created: 1/2/2007 [1/2/07] Please provide spillway design and detail for all detention ponds. Response: Details for all pond outfalls and control structures have been added to the detail sheets C- 513 to C-516. Please provide erosion protection at all outlets into ponds. Response: Rip rap has been added to all pond inlet structures. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Pagel 1 of 18 Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 93 Created: 1/2/2007 [1/2/07] Please maintain 10 feet of horizontal separation between trees and storm lines, this is relevant along the rear of the Super Target building and in some of the parking areas. Response: The landscaping has been adjusted to maintain the 10 foot separation. The first street trees along the entrance from Ziegler on the north and south side of the street are located right above inlets. These will need to be moved. Response: The street trees have been removed. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 112 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/071 Adjust trees to eliminate conflicts with F Hydrants and meter pits. Response: Trees have been adjusted to avoid conflicts with fire hydrants or hydrants have been moved to better locations to allow for tree placements. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Off -site construction plans Number: 94 Created: 1/2/2007 [1/2/07] There are significant off -site easements and temporary construction agreements that need to be obtained from the property owners prior to plan approval. Response: Off site easements and temporary construction agreements are being created and obtained. Copies of the easement sketches are enclosed for your review. The irrigation lateral construction on the south side of harmony will require approval from the owner of that lateral. Response: The owner of the lateral is Warren Lake Irrigation Ditch Company. They have been contacted and are willing to sign off on the plans. We will obtain a letter from them stating that they have reviewed the plan set and have no objections. The letter will be provided to the City upon receipt. Please provide erosion protection at all pipe outlet locations. Response: Rip Rap has been provided at all pipe outlets into ponds. See sheet C-170 to C-179 for location of rip rap and FES structures into ponds. Please use wattles instead of gravel inlet filters at inlet locations, since these tend to perform better and are less demanding of maintenance. Response: Gravel inlet filters have been replaced with wattles at pond inlet locations. See sheet C-145 for these locations. Please differentiate between inflow and outflow curbs in medians. Response: The inflow and outflow median curbs have been identified. See Corbett Drive plan & profile sheets C-275 to C-280. Please show that the south pipe of the existing dual 18" pipes crossing Ziegler is being removed. Do not extend FES as shown on plans. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 12 of 18 Topic: Off -site easement Number: 84 Created: 12/28/2006 112/28/06] Is the proposed ouff all pipe that extends north across the LSI property within an existing drainage easement? If not, an easement from that property owner would be required prior to plan signature. Please add a note specifying that all off -site areas disturbed during construction activities will be re -vegetated. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Topic: Off -site grading Number: 86 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] It seems that a significant amount of berming is proposed on the LSI property to the north, a grading easement from the property owner would be required prior to approval. Response: An easement is being acquired for this purpose. A copy of the draft easement sketch is enclosed for your review. Topic: Off -site Impacts Number: 81 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] There is a concern over the impact of the new development over the existing detention behind Ziegler Road. It is important that modeling be presented that shows that the development will cause no adverse impact on the property that is to the north of the development site currently owned by LSI, and that the area that is inundated by the effective detention behind Ziegler Road would remain within the limits of the existing easement. Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Topic: Pond D Overflow Number: 82 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] Please show where the overflow from Pond D will be directed and how these flows will be spread through a weir section designed into the spillway. Provide a design for such a spillway. Response: Additional grading for the weir has been added to sheet C-181, and a detail added to sheet C-509. Topic: Storm Line Profiles Number: 88 Created: 1 /2/2007 [1/2/07] Please indicate on the storm line profiles which line will be publicly maintained and those that will be privately maintained. Please provide a public maintenance access easement for all publicly maintained lines. Response: All proposed storm lines that will be public are identified on sheet C-220, and on the storm plan / profile sheets. Some lines are at a 0.2 % slope, would it be possible to provide a 0.4% minimum slope? Response: As discussed and agreed in our meeting, the pipes need to remain at 0.2%. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 13 of 18 Please show drainage easements on the profile sheets. Response: Drainage easements have been added to the storm plan / profile sheets C-221 to sheet C-250. Inlet 133-1 shows a significant amount of water backing out of the inlet in the 100 year storm, this must be a drafting error. Response: This has been corrected on sheet C-228. Please call out the depth of ponding whenever it does occur on the profile sheets. Ponding in parking lots is not encouraged but is acceptable if it is at 6" (correction, 12 inches) or less. Response: We have noted the ponding areas on the plans, and meet the 12" max. flooding requirement. Storm lines bringing flows from the outlots along Harmony should be within a public drainage easement. Response: A drainage easement has been added to the North side of all outparcels along Harmony for the conveyance of stormwater to our system. Please label irrigation line on all plans. Show irrigation line crossings of storm lines on profiles. Response: The irrigation line has been labeled, and crossings have been added. Please provide a profile for the irrigation line. Response: A profile has been created for the irrigation line as sheets C-251 to C-253. Please add note that all off -site areas disturbed during the construction of drainage facilities are to be re -vegetated. Response: A note has been added to sheet C-145 & sheet C-220. Topic: Stormwater Master Planning Comments Number: 80 Created: 12/28/2006 [12/28/06] Storm Drainage Master Plan Comments for Front Range Village • Please ensure that WQCV is not included in the rating curves for EPA or MODSWMM Response: WQCV has not been included in the rating curves for EPA or MODSWMM. • Drawing No. C-153 appears to be for inflow purposes for EPASWMM, and if so, it should be labeled as such. If it isn't, what are the purposes of the "dummy" lines to Node 270 Response: The "dummy" lines have been revised to show the pond routing correctly. • Please provide a more representative schematic for MODSWMM/MP condition that you are preparing, including the offsite recommendations (i.e. Ziegler Pond, English Ranch, Mobile Home Park, etc.) Response: This has been addressed in the revised drainage report. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 14 of 18 • The flows entering the HP swale, shown on Drawing No. C-152, don't match any of the flow numbers shown in the report, or in MODSWMM. Which are the correct numbers? Response: This has been addressed in the revised drainage report. • How are you getting the flows from the Mobile Home Park from Pond D to the future development to the north? Response: This has been addressed in the revised drainage report. • Will the 100 year flows from the Mobile Home Park remain within the undeveloped land north of Front Range Village, or will it impact the homes in English Ranch? Will it overtop Timberline Road? Response: This has been addressed in the revised drainage report. • Please provide a rating curve for the Future Ziegler Pond (Pond No. 298). This will include flows from the Mobile Home Park and the future development north of Front Range Village. Response: This has been addressed in the revised drainage report. • Are you planning on building some sort of diversion to keep the overflow from English Ranch out of Pond 298? If not, how are those flows going to be routed through Pond 298? Another option would be to recommend that the master plan be amended by an enlargement of the English Ranch Pond to include Pond 298. Response: This has been addressed in the revised drainage report. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 90 Created: 1/2/2007 [1/2/07] Please provide storm line type and size on overall utility plans. Response: The storm line types and sizes have been added to sheet C-220. Please label the irrigation line that takes water from Harmony across the site clearly. Who owns this lateral, signature from the lateral owner is required. Response: The irrigation line has been labeled on sheets C-185 & C-220. The owner of the lateral is Warren Lake Irrigation Ditch Company. They have been contacted and are willing to sign off on the plans. We will obtain a letter from them stating that they have reviewed the plan set and have no objections. The letter will be provided to the City upon receipt. Please provide encasements for all water line crossings of storm sewers, 10 feet either side of crossing. Response: Storm pipe joint encasements have been added to joints within 10 feet of either side of the water line crossing lowerings. As shown on sheet C-502 and storm plan and profiles. Topic: Water quality outlet box details Number: 92 Created: 1/2/2007 [1/2/07] Please provide a construction quality detail for all water quality outlet boxes, including wing walls if any and an actual plate detail, rather than just a general table for all of them. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 15 of 18 Response: Individual pond outfall control structure details have been provided on sheets C-513 to C-516. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 19 Created: 8/29/2006 [1/4/071 [8/29/06] At locations where sewers are dead ending, the manholes may be moved back to the last service to reduce sewer length (with the exception of at the north and west boundaries of the project). Response: The sanitary terminus manholes have been relocated to the point of the last service where possible. Number: 24 [1 /4/07] Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Standard details for water meters have been updated. Use current details. Response: The water meter details have been updated on sheet C-500. Number: 25 [1/3/07] Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Show irrigation taps on the utility plans. Response: An irrigation tap has been added to the plan sheets C-185 and C-189. Number: 99 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/071 Connect to the existing water main which is west (or southwest) of the LSI building. Response: The proposed 8" water main has been connected to the existing 8" water main as shown on sheet C-193. Number: 100 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Review all water main lowerings. If the water main is a looped main and if the main can go over the sewer (storm or sanitary) while maintaining a minimum of 4 feet of cover over the water main and 1 foot clear separation from the sewer, eliminate the lowering. Response: We have reviewed the lowerings and adjusted some of the lines as indicated. Number: 101 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Show and label the water main lowerings on the Utility Plan sheets (C-186 through C-194). Response: The water main lowerings have been called out on these utility sheets. Number: 102 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/071 Add a temporary F Hydrant at the end of the 8-inch main on the west edge of the site adjacent to the Pads at Harmony. Response: We have left this as a note on sheet C-192 as we believe that Pads at Harmony will come in first and the dead end line condition will not exist. Number: 103 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/071 Is there a conflict with the FCLWD main where the 12-inch main extends north from Harmony? Pothole and add information to the plans. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 16 of 18 Response: The pot holing will be done as soon as the weather permits. Information will be provided to the City at that time. Number: 104 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] The existing sewer on the west side of Ziegler is a 30-inch diameter. Label the manholes to be installed at the two connection points as 60-inch MH's. Response: See sheets C-208 and C-201, which show the 60" manholes at the connection points on Ziegler. Number: 105 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Add notes at existing MH's on the 30-inch sewer along Ziegler to raise to finished grade. (Some may be buried at this time.) Response: Offsite plan comments are being addressed in the offsite plans. Responses will be provided with the revised plans upon completion. Number: 106 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Provide calculations to confirm that 8-inch sewers are adequate throughout the development. Response: We are currently working on this. Calculations will be provided to the City as soon as they are available. Number: 107 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Show all water/sewer crossings on storm plan & profile sheets. Response: All water/sewer crossings have been shown on the storm plan & profile sheets. Number: 108 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] If north/south irrigation line is to stay, add plan and profile sheet. Response: Irrigation plan/profile sheets C- 251 to C-253 have been added to the plan set. Number: 109 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Show concrete encasement where needed on water main/sewer crossings. Response: We have added concrete encasement to storm pipe joints above water lines. See storm plan/profile sheets for more info. Number: 110 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Add steel casing at each point where water or sanitary sewer mains pass under storm sewers 24-inch and larger. Extend casing minimum of 5 feet beyond the outside of the storm pipe. Response: Steel casings have been added to the water and sanitary mains that pass under storm sewer pipe 24" and larger. See utility plans for more info. Number: 111 Created: 1/4/2007 [1/4/07] Revise the notes for Tracer Wire (On Sheet C-500) as shown in the redlined utility plans. Response: The tracer wire detail notes have been revised per redlines. Stantec January 29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 17 of 18 Department: Zoning Topic: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Number: 3 Created: 8/23/2006 [12/12/06] This is now Note #5 on the Cover Sheet. However, the wording hasn't been changed to reflect what the code requires, which is that screening from adjacent properties is also required. [8/23/061 Note #5 on sheet 1 of 10 should be amended to reflect what Section 3.5.1(I)(2) states. Specifically, the code states that mechanical equipment must be screened from "...adjacent properties and public streets." Response: Note # 5 has been changed. Number: 4 Created: 8/23/2006 [12/12/06] The "service area" is labeled and shown for some buildings but not all. i.e. I don't see loading/delivery for Lowes (there's one labeled in the front for customers, but where do deliveries happen?). Also, I don't see anything labeled for the sporting goods building. Response: Known "service areas" are labeled on the plans. [8/23/06] Please label the loading/delivery areas for the various buildings so that we can see how they will function (i.e. how easy can semis and other delivery trucks access those areas) Response: The known areas designated for loading/delivery are labeled on the revised plans. Number: 5 Created: 8/23/2006 [12/12/06] Still don't see bike parking for home improvement and numerous other buildings (C-2, E-7, F-3, F-4, F-7, F-8, etc) [8/23/06] Where is the bike parking for the home improvement building? Response: We are working with Transportation Planning on bike rack locations as the development of the hardscaping in front of the buildings continues. Number: 6 Created: 8/23/2006 [12/12/06] The "large format banners" have been removed. However, the Lowes and Target (especially the Target logo) signs appear to be taller than 7'. It's difficult to tell since there's no scale indicated on the elevation drawings of these two buildings, and using my scale is not exact. But sign permits will not be issued for signs that are taller than 7'. Note #8 on the cover sheet states that signs will comply with the sign code, so that is adequate to cover this, but it would be a good idea if the signs on the Target and Lowes elevations were downsized or a specific note added to those sheets. [8/23/061 The elevation drawings show "large format banners". They appear to be taller than 7'. They are considered to be wall signs, and the code limits them to 7' in height (Sec. 3.8.7(I) of the LUC). Response: The signs shall comply with the City Sign code. No Text Stantec January29, 2007 Front Range Village — Response Letter Page 18 of 18 Number: 9 Created: 8/23/2006 [12/12/06] Still not shown. 18/23/06] If there are screen walls at the loading areas, please provide some detail - how high, what material - and label them on the site plan. Response: Details for the screen walls have been added to the plans. Number: 10 Created: 8/23/2006 [12/12/061 This is now Note #7 on the cover sheet, but they still aren't shown. [8/23/06] Note #7 on sheet 1 of 10 refers to trash dumpsters. But I don't see any shown on the site plan. If there are dumpster/enclosures proposed, please show and label. Response: The known trash dumpsters are shown and labeled. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. Response: All redlined plans have been returned with this submittal. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 482-5922. Sincerely, LTING INC. illkomm, P.E. Tel:970-482-5922 Fax:970-482-6368 awillkomm@stantec.com cc. Stantec file, Eric Mallory TOMMY ALFANO DIRECT DIAL: (205) 7954193 FACSIMILE: (205) 7954164 E-MAIL: TALFANO@BAYERPROPERTIES.COM June 14, 2007 Marc P. Virata City of Fort Collins — Engineering Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Subject: Front Range Village — Corbett Extension Estimate. Dear Marc: RECEIVr JUN 2 7 4uui Attach is the construction estimate for; (a) cost to extend Corbett Drive to the periphery of the development, (including the extension of sidewalk along the west side of Corbett Drive and the removal of thee cul-de-sac- bulb); (b) cost to extend the sidewalk along the east side of Corbett Drive approximately 120 feet to the northern platted boundary. The estimate is submitted in accordance with the Development Agreement section II.C.I I and II.C.12 of subject project. Upon review and approval by the City of Fort Collins, a check will be issued in the appropriate amount in accordance with Section 24-95 of the City Code. If you have any questions or need additional information please call me at (205) 795-4193. Sincerely, BAYER PROPERTIES, LLC L! Tommy Alfano Senior Project Manager CC: Eric Mallory BAYER PROPERTIES, LLC • 2222 ARLINGTON AVENUE a BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35205 • (205) 939-3111 0 www.bayerpropertimcom Front Range Village Ft. Collins, CO Bayer Properties June 14, 2007 HOAR CONSTRUCTION Description Unit Price TOTAL A Grading & Excavation Mobilization 1 Is $ 2,475.00 2 475 Fine grade curb & gutter 460 If $ 1,27 584 Fine grade sidewalks 1,080 sf $ 0.18 191 Remove Sidewalk 1,390 sf $ 4.01 6,571 Remove Asphalt 975 sy $ 5.89 5,746 Remove Curb & Gutter 370 sf $ 3.54 1,308 Unclassified Excavation - Cut-to-FIII 750 cy $ 2.50 1,875 Finish Grading 1,500 sy $ 0.14 212 Surve ing Sanitary Sewer System 1 Is $ 1,143.00 1,143 B Mobilization 1 Is $ 1,297.00 1.297 8" sewer, 8' - 12' depth 130 If $ 33.00 4,290 Sewer Manhole 48" 1 ea $ 2,181.00 2,181 Adjust manhole 1 ea $ 413.00 413 Surveying 1 is $ 377.00 377 Domestic Mobilization 1 Is $ 1,297.00 1,297 12" PVC Waterline 130 If $ 46.00 5,980 Remove and Replace Reducer, 6" pipe and fire hydrant 1 ea $ 2,829.00 2,829 12" Tie To Existing 1 as $ 2,004.00 2,004 Surveying 1 Is $ 613.00 613 • Asphalt Paving, Curbs & Striping Mobilization 1 Is $ 5,187.00 5,187 Concrete Curb & Gutter 30" Vertical 450 If $ 10.75 4,838 Asphalt Pavement Corbitt Drive 1,110 sy $ 26.11 28,982 Pavement Markings 1 Is $ 684.00 684 Signage 1 Is $ 1,143.00 1,143 Surveying 1 Is $ 1,061.00 11061 E Sidewalks Concrete Sidewalk (6" Thick City ROW) 1,080 sf $ 3.00 31240 Fine Grade for East Sidewalk 6" 720 sf $ 0.18 127 East Concrete Sidewalk (6" Thick City ROW) 720 sf $ 3.00 2,161 Subtotal8 Fee A3,3 GRANDContractor TOTAL: 406/20/07 08:56 FAX 970 482 3036 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC 2001 RAMSEY D. MYATr ROST, W. 19wMES, JA RICHARD S. GAST JPFPREYI. JORMON nAMEL C. MUTMY BRAN R. IxoNE JOSHUA 8. %UGTSI; Wa Facsimile: 970-221-6378 Marc Virata, Civil Engineer II City of Fort Collins Engineering Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PROEMIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW C[.00 TOW SQUARE 323 SOuTaCOLLEGEAMAM, SUM J FORT COLUNS, COLORAno 90S24-2945 June 20, 2007 Ref Front Range Retall Company, L.L.C. Our File No. 3272-001 Dear Marc: TELEPHONE (970) 4924846 FACSIWX (970)482-3038 Pursuant to our exchange of voieemails yesterday, I am faxing a complete copy of the Deed of Dedication for Easement (Drainage and Utility) and a complete copy of the Deed of ,Dedication for Easement (Access and Emergency Access) both including the Wachovia Bank subordination and attorney certification. Bayer Properties will deliver all original documents to your office for recording upon our offices receipt of the original Wachovia documents. I should have the original Wachovia subordination on Thursday. The original easements and attorney certification are already in Fort Collins and properly executed. Thank you for your cooperation and willingness to proceed on facsimile documents. I am available for your questions and comments. L-2 JJJ/bdz Enclosures cc: Chad J. Post David Brown H:IWPCJD1Pm,AAapRcd -Vzya Cm. 547 Mnm Vi,,,u hr.OW Very truly yours, MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC O6/20/07 08:38 FA% 970 482 3038 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC 11002 DEED OF DEDICATION FOR EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the undersigned Front Range Retail Company. L.L.C., being the owner of certain real property in Larimer County, Colorado legally described as Front Ranee Villaoc3 in the Larimer County Records, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration, does hereby dedicate, transfer, and convey to the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, a Municipal Corporation, for public use forever a permanent casement for Drainage and Utility in the City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof It is understood by the undersigned that, by acceptance of this dedication, the City of Fort Collins will not accept the duty of maintenance of such easement. Witness our hands and seals this L day of 4u o t- , 200-1. Grantor: Front Range Retail Company, L.L.C. By: I 'V -duQ Title(Authorized Ag_em Name and Address: Jill V. Deer Front Range Retail Company, L.L.C. 2222 Arlington Avenue l3knik akin, AL 35205 ATTEST: B Title: klul oaa4 fAw"g- State of ArL) ) as County of .gtarr+mJ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Itday ofj%AR=. 2001, by S Lw V.'p-eit as jk6rweub and 22§d►, 4t, Phan_ as *V40ncaeo Asir . Witness my hand and off ..,,My commissiorr expires: r :r � 06/20/07 08:56 FAX 970 482 8038 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC 2003 LENDER CONSENT AND RATIFICATION Wachovia Bank, N.A. having a security interest in or lien upon all or any part of the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, hcrcby approves, ratifies, confirms, and consents to the foregoing Deed of Dedication for Easement for the purpose of subordinating its security interest in or lien to the Deed of Dedication for Easement WITNESS our hands and seals thiselAy of June, 2007. STATE OF ALA13AMA ) )ss COUNTY O&jQLM,,) 16 Thq farregoin'g-Lender Consort was aF1p owled before me this%ib day of June, 2007, by �f1�".A 2ykc n [Name]. VGr jlpeS', (Title], Wachovia Sank, N.A. 1, iMEN MEMAKUAM '>� e},hy',' der•; c: f ., �.Ef,'•. :. dye :�{i�k� ;08/20/07 08:5e FAX 970 482 0098 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC 10004 ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the forgoing Deed has been duly executed as required pursuant to Section 2.2.3 (C)(3xa) through (e) inclusive of the Land Use Code of the City of Fort Collins and that all persons signing this Deed on behalf of a corporation or other entity are duly authorized signatories under the laws of the State of Colorado. This Certification is based upon an examination of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Latimer County, Colorado as of the date of execution of the deed and other information discovered by me through reasonable inquiry and is limited as authorized by Section 22.3(C)(3)(f) of the Land Use Code. Aut.Al F t y RegistraLti),o�n �No. 1 %;x l Date: This Deed of Dedication is accepted by the Director of Community planning and Environmental Services pursuant to Section 2.1.5 of the Land Use Code of the City of Fort Collins this day of , 200 . Cameron Gloss As delegee for the Director of Community plamring and Environmental Services ATTEST: City Clerk Q8/20/07 08:56 FAX 970 482 3038 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC la005 06/20/07 08: 57 FAX 970 462 0098 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC [a 009 REPRESENTATION OF:aMl' . -:I R.AINAGE :Mb OTIUV EAUMI.ENT .... SHEET 2 OF 2 98/20/07 08:57 FAY 970 482 3008 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC [a 007 DEED OF DEDICATION FOR EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY TMSE PRESENTS: That the undersigned Front Emu Retail Comvanv L.L.C.: being the owner of certain real property in Latimer County, Colorado legally described as Front we Village in the Lorimer County Records, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) in hand 'paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration, does hereby dedicate, transfer, and convey to the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, a Municipal Corporation, for public use forever a permanent easement for A=ess and Emer¢encv ,Access in the City of Fort Collins, County of Lorimer, State of Colorado, more particularly described on Exhibit "BA attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. It is understood by the undersigned that, by acceptance of this dedication, the City of Fort Collins will not accept the duty of maintenance of such easement Witness our hands and seals this -J16 day of juw� 2007_. ATTEST: Title: taar�ep State of 4U%12U ) County of 1 VV'Vj By: Title: Auth?B_tl1 Name and Address: All V. Deer Front Range Retail Company, L.L.C. 2222 Arlington Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this iTM day of jupte 2001, by htr V. vedfL as pup tau+: and O.6,tiWt ter as rwettAr Witness my hand and official seal. :: MyEoiamission expires: Neighborhood EntWay Median 8' 2' Asphalt Patch Neighborhood Sign Median Cover 15, M Curb and Gutter tw 06/20/07 08:57 FAX 070 482 3008 HYATT BRAA'DES & GAST PC 11008 LENDER CONSENT AND RATIFICATION Wachovia Bank, N.A. having a security interest in or lien upon all or any part of the real property described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, hereby approves, ratifies, confirms, and consents to the foregoing Deed of Dedication for Easement for the purpose of subordinating its security interest in or lien to the Deed of Dedication for Easement. A WTTNESS our hands and seals this s day of June, 2007. t Ji'����3!► �. STATE OF ALABAMA ) )as COUNTY OF :A&uQji ) �ff The goin Lender Consent was aelmowled ed before me this 20� y of June, 2007, by'"(�►(C P h [Name], i FeS. itle],WachoviaBank, N.A. My commission expires M�� acre U6/20/07 08:57 FAX 970 482 3098 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC 2009 ATTORNEY'S CERTUnCATION I hereby certify that the forgoing Deed has been duly executed as required pursuant to Section 2.2.3 (C)(3)(a) through (e) inclusive of the Land Use Code of the City of Fort Collins and that all Persons signing this Deed on behalf of a corporation or other entity are duly authorized signatories under the laws of the State of Colorado. This Certification is based upon an examination of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Larimer County, Colorado as of the date of execution of the deed and other information discovered by me through reasonable inquiry and is limited as authorized by Section 2.2.3(C)C3X)(3xf) ofthe Laad Use Code. A s 323 SeA,4- li�i #� Registration No, Date: b c This Deed of Dedication is accepted by the Director of Community Planning and Environmental Services Pursuant to Section 2.1.5 of the Land Use Code of the City of Fort Collins this day of 200 Cameron Gloss As delegee for the Director of Community Planning and Environmental Services ATTEST: City Clerk 4)6/20/07 08:57 FAX 970 482 3038 31YATT BRANDEs & GAST PC Im 010 EXHIBIT B ACCESS AND 1 EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT 0000tRTY DESCRIPTION SHEET I OF 2 20070018184 OF THE SHIP 7 NORTH, COLQRADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW6+ LARIMER, STATE OF RANGE 88 WEST aF 7FiE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIApI BEARS N 00'It'07' E; TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH. BECIN ...... ..... A POINT. SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF TO. THE..Rl9NT.A-QI$TANCE OF 50.66 Fat WITHA CENTRAL ANGLE Or 312! AND A:.CH0RD **C" BEARS R an 3-W W A k DISTANCE, OF 53,33So;9a SET; To I FEET THE LEST A DISTANCE OF 4&s6 ".A ;"ORD VAiCH FEET VATH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF "207r. A . REARS N M3'58" W. 4$,413'F= k.DISTANCE OF 14&03 PEET. TO TW;}gpHj.A DISTANCE OF 115.06 'FEET'" T'" CENTRAL ANGLE OF AND A CH, VMS N '15WQQ" W, $4.12 FEET;30-0(11�60!% A ...OF T61.88 FEET., 70 AND.... L.. 'A 0 .. �NQE OF 52,38 FEET WITH CEN*AL ANGLE OF 30-WOW, A N 75-C&OW W,*'51.76 FEET: dSTANCE OF -00 FEET TQ A OISTANCE OF 6S.46 FEET VATW A CENTRAL Am A.DISTA. EARS %E Or 30'WW, A 3 75WOO' I, g4r7O FW -QF 16.1.68 1 TO 11HE, LEFT A I A INCt or h.99 FEET WITH . A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30100 'oc�- WD A CHORD tH;M AEARS S 75'DO'OOr E . 71AB FEET; DISTANCE, OF 140,03 FEET: To 749 010(t A DISTANCE of 4o.os F V40 A WORD WH _Fy WITH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5-32-07'. A . .... . lcm BEARS 3 8713'56 ci .40,04 PEEF DISTANCE bir W,33 FEET, TO THE LEFT A.DI! SIANCE OF 4&M FEET WITH LRD CHORD WHICH REARS A. TRA4 ANGLE 9F 6-&Or, A THENCE S O"O'CO' E A DISTANCE OF 15.06 FEET TO v w' 13 ff I W.- -. THE POINT OF NNING;' CONTAINING' A COMPUTED AREA OF t$" ACRE . MORE OR LESS, StMVEYW5 STAXWNT I..HEREB.Y.$TA7t THAT THE ATTAC HED PROPERTY DESCRIP17M WAS PRMARED sy ME OR UNDER MY RESPONSftg CHARGE AND 15 ACCURATE T6 THIE BEST OIr.MY KNOKEOM AND BELIEF. WAD L I!WANSON, pLS 36010 N, R 64 W 0' STH pm rltv,;;07 �M, z.- -06/20/07 08:57 FAX 970 462 3038 MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC Qoll R&.PE'S`*'ENTAlI0N OF EMPIT B -ACCESS �T4 AND EMERGENCYAMPS EASEMENT SHE& 2" 6F R; RM MAO UWH", ITAr gI asnwwK ow PARCH WNTANS PL344 AC FRONT RANCK LOT Q . BECOMPANY, LM REC, NO. 200700iGIg4 SCALE0 266 ORIPP14AL WALE.; 1"-I00P ROAD I T7 t I .pow T dri KONNM I ij x�x ► -R, w i. cm� SE COR 32, 4 ORASS CAP XLEGIt PM FMarc Virata - Front Ran a Villa e - Lowe's O enin Date __ - Page 1 I From: Marc Virata To: anthony.elias@lowes.com Date: 4/15/2008 5:07:02 PM Subject: Front Range Village - Lowe's Opening Date Tony, In advance of our meeting tomorrow afternoon, I have gathered input from various City staff in Transportation and Planning, and we do not have any fundamental concerns on Lowe's seeking to move up their opening date from July 22nd to July 2nd. There are items of note, however, that we would like to be aware of as listed below: Since the initial approval and construction start of the overall shopping center, the City had several projects completed, which include road widening along Harmony Road and Ziegler Road as well as the construction of the intersection of Harmony Road and Ziegler Road in concrete. We also have several projects either currently under construction or slated to start soon, which include the full pavement of Harmony Road and Ziegler Road and the roundabout at the intersection of Horsetooth Road and Ziegler Road. We are committed to having all the road improvements completed well in advance of your anticipated July 2nd opening date. We anticipate based on our project schedules that the City's work related to road projects on Harmony and Ziegler will be completed by mid to late May. Please be aware that access to your site will be preserved from these streets during your period of stocking, training, and other related operations prior to opening on July 2nd though access may be slightly compromised during this time as it may coincide with the conclusion of these aforementioned road projects. City Engineering Inspection staff would like to meet at some point with Bayer and/or Hoar Construction to discuss any revising of their project schedules due to the change in opening date. Our Transfort (bus transit) Director has indicated that they do not envision having bus transit in operation to the overall center by July 2nd. A traffic control plan indicating how vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians are to access the Lowe's through this initial opening of the overall shopping center should be provided for review, if full access throughout the overall shopping center is not anticipated with the Lowe's opening. We will look to provide ongoing communication back to you should any issues arise on our end. Likewise, we appreciate any further information from you that may develop. Let me know of any questions or concerns, and a response to this email in general would be appreciated as evidence of your acknowledgment of the information contained herein. I have copied Dave Brown with Bayer and Jason Bird with Stantec for their own info as well. Marc P. Virata, P.E. City of Fort Collins - Engineering Department Phone: (970) 221-6605 Fax: (970) 221-6378 mvirata@fcgov.com CC: Dave Brown; Jason Bird Front Range Village May 21, 2008 Lowe's Milestone Dates: Racking: 5/28 Merchandise: 6/4 Employee Night: 6/29 Contractor Day: 6/30 Soft Opening: 7/1 Traffic Plan/Security 6/30 — 7/1 Sitework Status at 6/28 (Site Exhibit): Paving, striping and signage Parking lot lighting Sidewalk and hardscape Landscape Bus Shelter Status of off -site improvements at 6/28: Ziegler Road and traffic signal/Council Tree Harmony Road and traffic signal at Corbett Procedures / Inspections for Sign -offs — for 6/28: Corbett Drive Parking, lighting, signage/striping Stormwater Landscape Sidewalks / connectivity Site (developer) related items/issues that will prevent Lowe's from making milestone schedule dates: Merchandising Train/hire Open for employee night Open on 7/1/2008 PFA Issues? City of Fort Collins Issues? Traffic Engineering Zoning Building W C7 5 W 17 Z Z w u. C CCm o � � S a� Lh a ...• _ t J{{II p 4J� CY 1 A LA b j J jj ` A 00 c LU A. M N \ v L c y ro sz r Ln l0 1� 00 Ol O ei i-1 a i N a-1 M mn '-I t!1 bO N ri rl H 00 rl M Front Rangre Village Site Close-out Coordination Session May 29, 2008 Milestone Dates: Lowe's >> Racking: 5/28 Merchandise: 6/4 Certificate of Occupancy: 6/27 -- Traffic/Security Plan, 6/29 — 7/1 Employee Night: 6/29 Contractor Day: 6/30 Soft Opening: 7/1 Target's >> Certificate of Occupancy: 6/9 Soft Opening: 7/22 Grand Opening: 7/27 Other Major Anchor Opening Dates (subject to change) >> Staples: Projected Opening 8/3 The Sports Authoritv: Projected Opening 8/9 Toys R Us/Babies R Us: Projected Opening 8/22 Site -work Status at 6/19 (Site Exhibit): Paving, striping and signage Parking lot lighting Sidewalks/connectivity and hardscape Out Parcels/Future Building Pads Landscaping Bus Shelter Status of off -site improvements at 6/19: Ziegler Road/Paving >Traffic signal at Council Tree Harmony Road/Paving > Traffic signal at Corbett Harmony Road Xcel Overhead Power Lines Status of Buildings on 7/22 Small Shops/Office Buildings Anchor Buildings Library Future Construction Page 1 Procedures / Inspections for CO to Opening Center Site -work: >Corbett Drive >Parking, lighting, signage/striping >Stormwater >Landscape >Sidewalks / connectivity >Fire/Life-Safety Shell Buildings: >Building Inspections (Shell CO's) >Fire/Life-Safety (Shell CO's) Developer -related items/issues critical to making milestone schedule dates and CO's: • PFA processes/sign-offs • City of Fort Collins processes/sign-offs o Planning o Building Inspection o Zoning o Utilities; meter verifications; backflows o Traffic o Engineering o Stormwater Page 2