HomeMy WebLinkAboutRAINTREE COMMERCIAL PUD A - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-07-21�, Cay 7x-
../
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
May 22, 1985
Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
Eleven Old Town Square, Suite 200
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Dear Frank:
Staff has reviewed Raintree PUD - Phase 1, Tract B. and has the following
comments:
ENGINEERING
1. Parking was to be lower than the surrounding area - need to locate
retaining walls.
2. The 40'radius shown in the SE corner should be removed.
3. Need to show exterior radii.
STORM DRAINAGE
1. There is a potential for water backing up from inlet on Drake Rd, to
parking lot, especially if any sediment has built up in the outfall
line from the inlet. How will this be addressed?
LIGHT AND POWER
1. Any construction at the corner of Drake and Shields (landscaping,
signs, berms, etc.) will need to be coordinated with L & P as there are
two large vaults in this area (1 L & P, 1 telephone).
PUBLIC SERVICE
1. Request 15' wide utility easement adjoining the west ROW line of
Shields St, and north ROW line of Drake Rd, and 8' wide utility
easement adjoining ROW lines on both sides of Raintree Dr.
DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION - 1-1-- - - I . oox nou • t-ort COflrns. Colorado W522 • (303)221-6750
;1_/;l"i J r, . 28 May 85
J ; 14TEN6-79H RAINTREE COMMERCIAL PUD, PHASE 1 R E V I IS D
!f-
Revised Preliminary for Tracts A, B„ & C, Final for Tract B (only)
T
P
CITY OF FMRT COLLINS
E5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
January 28, 1985
Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects
11 Old Town Square, Suite 200
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Dear Frank:
Staff has reviewed the application for preliminary approval and first phase
final approval of the Raintree Commercial PUD and offers the following
comments:
PRELIMINARY
1. Staff has some serious concerns regarding traffic circulation. I
recommend we meet to discuss these items as soon as possible. In
general, the concerns are as follows:
a. The design of the main entrance to Raintree Drive in the northeast
corner of the project is unacceptable. The applicants need to
reevaluate the design of the curb cut in terms of its alignment and
width; setback from the future signalized intersection and its
relative location to future curb cuts on the other side of Raintree
Drive. This curb cut does not appear to be designed to any
standard.
b. Staff questions the design of the entrance to Raintree Drive in the
southwest corner of the project in terms of the transition;
location of the median; and distance to the signalized
intersection.
c. The site plan should show the existing design of the medians in
Drake Road and Shields Street. The limited left -turn median
improvements in Drake Road will not work with the previously
approved location of curb cut to Cimmarron Plaza. Staff questions
the length of left turn bays indicated in the traffic impact study.
Also, northbound left turns at the major entrance to Shields Street
will not be allowed in the future. Deceleration lanes for both
Drake Road and Shields Street curb cuts should be provided.
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
300 LaPorte Ave.
P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303)221-6750
Mr. Frank Vaught
From: Joe Frank
January 28, 1985
Page Two
d. The interior median design at the Shields Street entrance needs to
be redesigned. Some additional signage is recommended for this
area.
e. The curb cut for the drive -through facility is not justified and
should be removed.
f. Staff sees some problems with the design of the circulation system
for the drive -through facility.
g. The design of the Shields Street entrance needs to be reworked.
h. Staff questions the location of the other curb cuts on Raintree
Drive in terms of future sight distance problems. How will the
development of Tract G fit into the overall traffic circulation of
the site?
1. The Traffic Impact Study mentioned the need for double left turns at
the Shields Street/Drake Road intersection. How will this be
accomplished?
j. Raintree Drive should be designed to City standards.
k. The design of Shields Street should follow the plans on file in the
City's Engineers Office. The site plan should be revised to reflect
these plans.
2. All locations of handicapped ramps should be shown on the site plan.
3. All driveways should be dimensioned.
4. A 15 foot utility easement will be required along Shields Street and
Drake Road; eight foot easements will be required along all interior
streets. Please show all existing and proposed utility easements on the
site plan.
5. The curb cuts shall be concrete to property line. Please indicate on
site plan.
6. Staff questions the design of the loading area north of the 19,000
square foot retail pad.
7. Location of fire hydrants should be shown on the site plan.
8. Developer should contact Bob Snow at 224-7473 or Les Thompson at
224-7470 for information on Land Development Agreements and trench
requirements for telephone facilities.
9. A preliminary subdivision plat should be submitted.
10. Specific use of 4500 square foot "drive -through facility" should be
indicated on the site plan. If it is a restaurant, the location of the
"menu" board should be identified. The operation and design of the
Mr. Frank Vaught
From: Joe Frank �✓
January 28, 1985
Page Three
*so
drive-thru facility is unclear. Please note dimensions of drives in
the drive-thru.
11. Loading zone for "drive-thru" use should be indicated on the site plan.
12. Proposed land uses for Tract A and C should be indicated on the site
plan. If these uses are for retail or restaurant, loading zones will
be required.
13. Staff is unclear as to how future development of Tract 6 will be
incorporated into the rest of the plan. Please provide additional
information on this tract.
14. Phase lines are unclear.
15. Planning Objective should be revised to address the items as required
in the PUD regulations. Surrounding 150 foot information is
incomplete. Please revise. Point Charts justifying the proposed uses
should be submitted.
16. There has been considerable interest in a gas station in the area.
Staff strongly encourages the applicant to consider the location of a
gasoline service station use in this project. The site plan should
provide a specific listing of types of "retail uses" being contemplated
for the rest of the center.
17. Staff questions the desirability of locating a large parking lot on the
corner of Drake Road and Shields Street in terms of its negative visual
impact. Please provide evidence to justify the plan design.
18. The plan should provide for a pedestrian connection between the
proposed building in Tract C and the main retail center. Sidewalk
connection should be provided between Tract A building and public
street sidewalk. A sidewalk should be provided along the south edge of
the Shields Street entrance. The sidewalk along Raintree Drive should
be separated from the curb at least six feet.
19. The site plan should indicate location and fate of existing significant
trees. Please revise.
20. The landscape plan should be re-evaluated in terms of the following:
a. Provision of evergreens and shrub beds along all streets;
b. Additional foundation plantings along both sides of 22,000 square
foot retail building; 19,000 square foot retail building and for
the drive -through facility;
c. Additional landscape screening treatment of all parking lots and
drive -through facilities from public streets.
Mr. Frank Vaught
From: Joe Frank
January 28, 1985
Page Four
d. Parking islands should include low lying shrubs in addition to
trees.
e. Providing landscaping in medians in Drake Road and Shields Street.
21. Staff questions the location of the tree wells in the pedestrian
walkway in Tract D in terms of possible conflict with overhang of cars
in parking spaces.
22. What is proposed treatment of crosswalk areas. Please provide typical
detail of these areas on the site plan.
23. Building height of all buildings in feet and stories should be
indicated on the site plan.
24. Width of greenbelt areas along public streets should be indicated on
the site plan.
25. The site and parking statistics should also include "total" figures in
addition to figures for individual phases or buildings.
26. The site plan should provide statement of planning objectives for
compatible architectural treatment of buildings in the center.
27. Energy conservation measures should be indicated on the site plan.
FINAL PLAN
28. Staff has some problems with the traffic circulation plans. I
recommend we meet to discuss this item. In general, the problems are
as follows:
a. All improvements to Drake Road will need to be installed as part of
the first phase.
b. The design of the median in Drake Road will not work as a result of
the location of the curb cut as approved for the Cimmarron Plaza
PUD.
c. The median in the interior drive at the Drake Road entrance needs
some improvement.
d. The design and location of the Raintree Drive entrance is not
acceptable.
e. Existing medians in Shields Street should be shown on the site
plan. Full left turns will be allowed for the first phase of
development. In the future, limited left turns will be permitted.
Plans need to be made for handling left turn stacking on Shields
Street.
f. The Shields Street entrance design needs to be reworked.
Mr. Frank Vaught
From: Joe Frank
January 28, 1985 %W
Page Five
M
29. Handicapped ramps should be provided at all corners. Please revise.
30. The pedestrian access to Tract C from the mail retail center is poor.
A detached sidewalk will be required along Raintree Drive. The plan
should provide a sidewalk connection between Raintree Drive sidewalk
and sidewalk in front of 9600 sq ft retail building.
31. The plan should include dimensions for all walks, parking aisles, drive
cuts and interior radii. Please revise.
32. Staff questions the location of the tree wells in the pedestrian
walkway in terms of being hit by overhanging cars in parking spaces.
Please provide evidence to justify plan design.
33. All curb cuts and drives must be within the limits of the PUD. Please
revise.
34. The plan should include a note addressing the edge of pavement
treatment on interior driveway.
35. All curb cuts to be concrete to property line. Please note.
36. The design of Shields Street appears to be incorrect. Please follow
design as provided by the City Engineer's Office.
37. The applicant should work with staff to develop a sequence of names for
phases of the Raintree PUD that is not confusing.
38. The tracts cannot be platted as lots.
39. The easements to be continued through tract B. Please revise.
40. All easements should be shown on the site plan. Please revise.
41. Two new fire hydrants will be required at the north end of the site.
Please show locations of fire hydrants on the site plan. Please
indicate where the sprinkler connections will be located on the
buildings.
42. Distance of building envelopes to at least two platted property lines
should be indicated on the site plan.
43. The proposed use of the 9600 square foot building should be indicated
on the site plan. A specific listing of retail uses should also be
included on the plan. Please revise.
44. Bicycle parking should be provided for the 6400 square foot retail
building.
45. The location of property lines on the site plan are unclear and could
present problems at building permit review stage. Please clarify.
Mr. Frank Vaught
From: Joe Frank
January 28, 1985 VAW
Page Six
46. Staff questions the
spaces being provided
justify the plan.
*J
adequacy of the number of handicapped parking
for the grocery store. Please provide evidence to
47. Building height in feet and stories should be indicated on the final
site plan.
48. Six foot sidewalks will be required in front of retail building.
Please indicate.
49. Staff questions the desirability of locating the trash area for the
6400 square foot retail building next to the arterial street. Please
move.
50. Berming and additional plantings should be provided in the buffer area
between the grocery store and Raintree Drive.
51. The plant list and the landscape plan should indicate sizes and number
of shrub plantings in planting beds. Staff recommends the use of
larger than standard plantings at strategic locations in the site.
52. The landscape plan should indicate extent of sod areas along Shields
Street and Drake Road to be installed with the first phase.
53. Medians in Drake Road and Shields Street should be indicated. Landscape
plans for the medians should also be indicated. I recommend you
contact Tim Buchanan for guidance in these areas.
54. The foundation plantings should include some upright plantings such as
large shrubs or trees in addition to low growing vegetation. Please
revise.
55. The landscape plans should note existing trees to remain.
56. Energy conservation measures should be indicated on the site plan.
57. Exact treatment of pedestrian crossings should be shown on the site
plan.
58. Building elevations should be submitted for 6400 square foot retail
building. Elevation of north, south and west sides of buildings should
be indicated. Elevations should note exterior building materials and
colors.
59. Signed mylars of the final subdivision plat, site plan, landscape plan
and building elevations should be submitted to me no later than
Thursday, February 21, 1985. Also, a signed copy of the Site and
Landscape Covenants documents should also be delivered on that date.
60. On Monday, February 18, 1985, 8 1/2" x 11" reductions of all plans and
colored renderings of the preliminary and final plans should be
submitted to this office. Also on that date, ten full size copies of
all plans should be submitted to me.
Mr. Frank Vaught
From: Joe Frank *AW
January 28, 1985
Page Seven
I recommend we meet as soon as possible to discuss the above comments.
Revisions to the plans should be delivered to this office no later than
Monday, February 4, 1985. If you cannot meet the above deadlines, I
recommend the item be continued until the March meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Board. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Joe F;ank
Senior City Planner
cc: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator
Sam Mutch, Planning Director
7 May 85 rw
DaA
DEPAR
TAil s RAINTREE COMMERCIAL PUD, Ph 1, Tract B, Preliminary.
6