HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIRAMONT SELF STORAGE PUD LOT 2 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-06-09a �q i
III, Ir
Selected Issues Report
Cityof 1vrt Collinti
4/10/2008 Date:
Miramont Self Storage PUD - Lot 2 - Boardwalk Office Building
Minor Amendment
SELECTION CRITERIA: Status = All
ISSUES:
Department: Engineering
Topic: General
Number: 13
[7/31/06] Oakridge Drive and Boardwalk are
required and a 9' utility easement is required.
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Created:7/31/2006 Resolved
2 Lane Collectors - a total of 76' of row is
Number:14 Created:7/31/2006 Resolved
[7/31/06] Is the sidewalk along Oakridge existing? If so, it needs to be widened to 8' to
remain attached. You can remove the sidewalk, detach it and construct a 5' sidewalk as
required by current standards. See figure 7-51F for other requirements such as an 8'
parkway, etc.
Number:15 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] Please construct the driveway entrance in accordance with drawing 707.
Number:16 Created:7/31/2006 Resolved
[7/31/06] An 8' minimum crosspan is required along Collector Streets. A 6' (existing?) is
shown. If it is existing and it is in need of repair or replacement, then an 8' crosspan must
be constructed in its place.
Number:17 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] Please label and dimension all row, easements, sidewalk widths, etc, and whether
or not the improvements are proposed or existing. Right now the plans aren't very clear.
Number:18 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] No footings or foundations are allowed in the easements.
Number:19 Created:7131/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] Please label proposed project ID signs. Is this located in a Tract or?
Number:20 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] Please see Transportation Planning regarding the configuration of the handicap
ramp on the west side of the building.
Number:21 Created:7/31/2006 Resolved
[7/31/06] A 50' parking setback from the street flowline is required.
Number: 32
Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
Page 1
[7/31/06] Will need an access easement for the portion of the ramp on Boardwalk that is not
built in public row unless this is in a tract with an access easement already dedicated?
Please verify and label accordingly.
Topic: Site Plan
Number:22 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] Please remove contour lines from the Site Plan.
Topic: Street Oversizing
Number:11 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] From Tim Tuttle in Street Oversizing: the Estimated Street Oversizing Fee for this
development is $34,345.76.
Number:12 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/061 From Tim Tuttle in Street Oversizing: Street Oversizing will reimburse the
developer for 0.5 of sidewalk on Boardwalk Drive.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number:23 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/061 Detail Sheets - Label all on -site details as "on site" so that they are not used in the
public row.
Number:24 Created:7/31/2006 Resolved
[7/31/061 Detail Sheets - the sidewalk culvert shown can not be used in public row. Please
provide D10 or D11, whichever is appropriate.
Number:25 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] Detail Sheets - Please provide details 701, 702, 707, 708, 1601, 1602, 2501.
Number:26 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/061 Please see Appendix E1 and E2 for the current General and Construction Notes.
Please see Bob Zakely for the correct Erosion Control Notes.
Number:27 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] The Legend is incomplete.
Number:28 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[71311061 General Notes page - reference the updated or current soils report. Please
provide two project bench marks. Please provide the names, addresses, phone numbers
for the Developer(s), Owner(s), and Consultant(s).
Number:29 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/061 Grading Sheet - Please provide this statement:
The top of foundation elevations shown are the minimum elevations required for protection
from the 100 year storm.
Number:30 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
[7/31/06] Is Oakridge to the north public row or is this a private drive? A tract?
Number:31 Created:7/31/2006 Unresolved
Page 2
(7/31/06] The site plan is showing proposed water and sewer bring brought in from
Boardwalk - is this correct? If so, please update the utility plans to match.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Kurt Ravenschlag
Topic: Easements
Number:53 Created:8/8/2006 Unresolved
[8/8/06] No Comment
Page 3