The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIGDEN FARM TWELFTH BROOKLYN PARK ROW HOUSES - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-05-28Selected Issues Report CiiY of Fmt Cblliue Date: 4/23/2008 BROOKLYN PARK ROW HOUSES, PHASE 2 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW SELECTION CRITERIA: Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number:11 Created:812512006 Pending [8/25/06] The first driveway off Kansas is much too close to Custer and presents a safety issue. Our minimum driveway setback is 175' from CL to CL and it appears that you have provided for only 100'. No variance will be granted due to safety and traffic concerns. Number:12 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25/06] Diagonal Parking off Kansas: This will not be permitted and no variance will be granted. Please design the street section in accordance with 7-9F. Number:13 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25106] Skewed Driveway off Kansas: A 75 degree skew has been proposed and does not meet our minimum requirement of 90 degrees, plus or minus 10 degrees for a minimum of 25'. A variance request will not be considered to this standard as it appears the site will easily accomodate that requirement. In other words, there are no site constraints that would prevent a safer, straighter driveway from being constructed to standard for the first 25'. Number:14 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8125/06] Attached Sidewalks: A variance will not be granted as there are no site constraints preventing this project from designing the typical street section to standard. Please design all street frontage in accordance with 7-9F and 7-5F. Please keep in mind as you are adjusting your layout that no structures of any kind, including stairs, retaining walls (versi-lock or other), footings and foundations, are allowed within the utility easement. See Figure 16-1 for other requirements regarding minimum setbacks for other objects and materials. Number:15 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25/06] Please design driveways in accordance with 706 or if the TIS shows more than 350 trips a day, then design the driveway in accordance with 707 per 9.3.2.A. Since the driveways will become part of emergency access drive, PFA may require 25' curb returns to meet their minimum inside turning radii requirements instead of our 20' requirement'. PFA's safety minimums would take precedence. The maximum grade from the row (back of walk) is 8% for a minimum of 20' per 9.3.3.13. Page 1 Number:16 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25/061 Until existing conditions (including unbuilt approved driveway locations) are shown for a minimum of 150' from the property boundaries, the driveway locations cannot be approved. Proposed driveways must line up with those proposed across the street. Number:17 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8125/06] See Figure 19-6 for parking setback requirements. The traffic volumes discussed in the TIS will be necessary to use the table and determine the required setback to the first garage door from the street. It will probably be either 40' or 50' Number:18 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25106] No structures of any kind are allowed within easements. See Comment 14. Number:19 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25/061 A utility coordination is suggested prior to first submittal. Please contact me so that I can set one up for you when you're ready with the new layout. Number:20 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25/06] Grading must be flat to nearly flat for a minimum of 2' behind the sidewalk. All grading affecting public row can not exceed 4:1 slopes. Number:21 Created:8/25/2006 Pending [8/25/061 Please see LCUASS and Appendix E4 for other submittal requirements. I can email the checklist to you to make it easier if you like. We have the items required prior to hearing hightlighted so you know what must be shown on the plans with the first submittal. The checklist must be completed and submitted with the first round of review as well. Email me at sjoy@fcgov.com and I'll send it back. Page 2 Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/ 18/06] Please title all plan sets to match the title on the plat (the title on the plat is correct, the rest are wrong). Also, the plat says 12th Filing and everything else says 14th Filing - which one is correct? Number: 11 Created: 12 / 18 / 2006 [12/ 18/06] Need to show existing features (sidewalks, driveways, ped ramps, etc) within 150' of the project limits. Please show all existing and proposed developments within these limits. You may call the engineers or site planners involved with the other projects to have them email you the autocad files (they are required to do the same of your project). Number: 15 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/ 18/06] Sidewalk needs to flare when tying into the existing pedestrian ramps at the corner. Please mirror what's existing on the other side. Number: 16 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/ 18/06] Need to show existing and proposed for a minimum of 150' of the project limits. Please coordinate with New Dawn and the rest to show how all of your projects are tying into each other. Number: 20 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/ 18/06] Please design sidewalk widths, parkway widths, etc in accordance with 7-6F, 7-9F and 7-5F. Number: 47 Created: 12 / 26 / 2006 [12/26/06] Directional ramps are required. Topic: Plat Number: 10 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/ 18/06] ROW can not be vacated by plat, only by council. We will need an exhibit and legal description for the area to be vacated with the Final Compliance submittal. Number: 48 Created: 12 / 26/ 2006 [12/26/06] From Technical Services: Add plat names to street dedications. Number: 49 Created: 12 / 26/ 2006 [12/26/061 From Technical Services: Plat matches legal, plat closes good, area good. Number: 50 Created: 12 / 26/ 2006 [12/26/06] From Technical Services: Plat name ok to use 12th Filing - use Phase 2. Number: 51 Created: 12/26/2006 [12/26/06] From Technical Services: Right-of-way cannot be vacated by plat. Number: 52 Created: 12 / 26/ 2006 [12/26/06] From Technical Services: Sight distance easement note not needed if no sight distance easement is being dedicated. Topic: Site Plan Number: 12 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/ 18/06] Please remove contours. Please label and dimension all easements, sidewalk widths, & parking stalls. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 45 Created: 12 / 26 / 2006 [12/26/06] 3 variance requests were received and approved. Please list them out under line 38 of the general notes. Number: 46 Created: 12 / 26 / 2006 [12/26/06] Please use a variety of line weights to show the existing (grey scale) and proposed (dark). j Topic: Utility Plans - General Notes Number: 14 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/ 18/06] Correct Line 47 to read NA and list the three variances approved under line 48. Number: 17 Created: 12 / 18 / 2006 112/ 18/06] The legend is incomplete. Missing easements, row or PL, and too many line weights on the plan are very similar - makes it hard to read. Topic: Utility PIans - Grading Number: 18 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/18/06] Need to dimension all sidewalk widths and parkways, utility easements, EA easements, etc. You can provide a horizontal control sheet if you like - that way the plans will stay legible and scan well. Number: 19 Created: 12/ 18/2006 [12/18/06] Grading must be flat to nearly flat for a minimum of 2' behind the sidewalk. Grades can not exceed 4:1 where affecting public row. Some slopes are not meeting that requirement and some slopes are not labeled. r PROJECT �� l_ k c i� ,>s 1ir t coion. COMMENT SHEET Uurre;,.: Planninc DATE: December 1, 2006 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt #56-98AN Rigden Far ,�A'—"rFilin rooklyn Park Rowhouse DP — Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: December 20, 2006 Note -Please identifv your redlines _f_or future reference DA6,9 /-�.�T it/am�� 7a S7-IZaa-7— ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, /or DMS) ': 'rl'-.4 °;, .1�/. x. / / �Jlar-�" G✓a ,`, r .y. s :;� C/ ' �2 /c,g r IUAm65,� 7a v.rcr jzt� �,•� y�r L),s 7-A Ne � L`�SrxT /Va7-0 /V� /tJesL'�� O / ,Uv S h�T ✓7 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of F� c�u FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET Cityof Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: February 22, 2007 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt #56-98AN/AQ RIGDEN FARM, 12TH FILING, BROOKLYN PARK ROWHOUSES, PHASE 2 PDPAND FINAL PLANS Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: March 21, 2007 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference �• PvLNt�R,tY�1F�AL CGOSE .', /rl/55iNG So+i.✓Dfrlli' � EASEr��.�T /n/Fo .9GONG ,r�pn/SAS Z?e/dE_ ❑ No Problems �—❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) 5C 6� a Name (please print) J I CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Ift _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape cx�v