Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOLD TOWN NORTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-04-19From: Mark Jackson To: Bob Blanchard, Bob Smith, Dave Stringer, Eric B... Date: Wed, Jan 19. 2000 11:45 AM Subject: Old Town North Meeting Update Good morning I wanted to give you all an update on this morning's meeting with Monica Sweere and her team re: the Old Town North development. Generally, I thought the meeting was pretty positive and I feel we covered a number of Monica's concerns. I also asked Shawn Mader and Scott Hersh to attend the meeting to discuss issues regarding ROW and impacts. Monica's concerns included: 1) The realigned Vine Drive as shown in the MSP runs roughly parallel to the Dry Creek project in the floodway area. Monica's team had questions as to how this would work with Vine ROW as well as additional width required for the Dry Creek treatment. I explained that John Daggett had worked with both Bob Smith and Rex Burns of Larimer County regarding the new alignment. Both agreed that the realignment was workable with the realignment. Bob S. and Matt, heads up. Monica has more questions re: these issues and will be contacting you soon. 2) Questions arose as to how to best incorporate a parallel circulator road into the Old Town North development, as shown in the N. College Corridor Plan (1995) as well as Kathleen's new Access Management Plan, which is nearing completion. Bruce Hendee reported that his preliminary traffic projections for this roadway indicate Collector -level volumes and would have to be designed accordingly. I explained that the AMP and N.College Plans are not engineered alignments, but that her development plan should be designed to the spirit of the parallel circulation route. We discussed different ways in which the circulator road could be incorporated into the design. Kathleen, heads up. You'll probably get some questions regarding the AMP. 3) Related to 2), there is an issue regarding ROW on the Vine Drive access into Monica's site. Specifically, the Wilmar property at 323 E.Vine currently encroaches approximately 30 feet into Monica's ROW. Shawn Mader (rep. for this property) asked Hersh Trucking if they would sell approximately 20 feet of land to the Wilmar's so that the access ROW could be shifted slightly to the west. The Hersh's were apprehensive about this as they had just been informed of the AMP parallel circulation road would run (at least conceptually) right through their property and they wanted to protect their business needs. We got all the parties together at the table and noted that the parallel circulator road could be shifted slightly to the east to meet Vine at the location of Monica's access point. This would keep the road from adversely impacting the Hersh property and would more easily allow for the Hersh's to sell the Wilmar property the land needed to shift the ROW. It appeared that this was a workable solution for all parties' needs. After some discussion it also appears that this alignment would have the least impact to existing old growth trees along the canal. 4) There was a question as to whether the ROW for the extension of Redwood Dr. had been purchased yet. I didn't know the answer to that one. Can any of you shed some light on this issue? Monica's team also had questions regarding relative alignment of the Redwood Drive extension and how to best cross the canal. Bruce Hendee noted that they would have to take their best shot with this new information and put a more detailed conceptual level plan together for further comment. Please let me know if you have any questions or wish to discuss any of these items further. Hope this helps. I'll forward more info as I receive it. MJ Action Items Item Description Action Owner Status Due 1.00 Lake Canal requires a 30' access Site plan and plat need to reflect BHA, Open ASAP easement easement Shear 1.01 Lake Canal will allow a trail to Set up meeting with the Lake Canal Monica Open ASAP coincide with the ditch road and Company. Meeting should include a Sweere, bridge crossings if an maintenance representative from Natural Resources, Dave agreement can be reached with the Engineering, Traffic, Storm Water and Stringer city. Lake Canal Company will Parks & Rec. not maintain the trees along lake canal. A maintenance agreement will also need to be made between the city and Lake Canal if the trees are to remain 1.02 Show Natural areas buffer and BHA to revise plans. BHA Open ASAP Wetlands Buffer on site and landscape plans 1.03 Confirm Ecological Cedar Creek to review and determine Cedar Open ASAP Characterization Study determines appropriate mitigation measures Creek quality of wetlands according to local and national requirements 1.04 There will not be a trail along BHA to revise plans BHA Open ASAP Redwood. 1.05 There will need to be a pedestrian BHA to review and revise plans BHA Open ASAP connection to College. A temporary asphalt sidewalk will work along Vine Street if it does not create a rise within the product 6 area. 1.06 Traffic study will need to be LSC to contact Ward and Kathleen to BHA, LSC, Open ASAP revised receive direction. BHA and Monica Monica need to determine pedestrian access to Sweere College. 1.07 An modification will need to be BHA to Draft Troy Jones to review. BHA Open ASAP submitted for side yard setback requirements 1.08 Utility coordination meeting Brian Shear and Dave Stringer to Shear, Open ASAP needs to be held to determine coordinate meeting. Dave feasibility of lot sizes. Stringer 1.09 Confirm Realigned Vine Drive Shear engineering to confirm and Shear, Open ASAP alignment meets City modify if necessary, BHA to revise BHA requirements site plan if necessary 1.10 Buffering will need to occur BHA to review and revise plans if BHA Open ASAP between incompatible uses to the necessary (Dependent on the status of south the trees along Lake Canal) 1.11 Clarify that Dry Creek will not be BHA and Sheer to revise drawings and BHA, Open ASAP affected within Phase I relevant submittal items Shear 1.12 Water quality treatment may Shear to review Shear Open ASAP occur at edge of detention onds 1.13 1 A Swim model will need to be run Shear to perform, BHA and Shear to Shear, Open ASAP to determine detention revise plans BHA END OF ACTION ITEMS LIST PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Foil Collins Current Planning DATE: March 21, 2001 TO: Transportation Planning PROJECT: #28-99A OLD TOWN NORTH PDP — PILOT PROJECT — 90% SUBMITTAL — TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current Planning no later than the PILOT PROJECT MEETING scheduled for: April 5, 2001 (meeting time still to be determined) Nnty_ P)vn.ce idnntifv vour redlines for future reference • Context & Site Plans need to show: (see redline comments) 1. Sidewalk on new Collector from the new trail south to existing Vine Drive. 2. Sidewalk from the site entrance on Redwood south to existing Vine Drive. 3. New Trail needs to extend eastward to connect to Redwood; not stop in the middle of the site. 4. Future roadway & bike/ped connections northward to New Realigned Vine. • Are there Dry Creek issues that preclude showing northern roadway and trail connections to New Vine? Note comments in TIS Can applicant clarify what roads are being constructed by this development and what roads will funds be escrowed for? (J3} ACP I f'; j . 4(,,At� CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat "Site —Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility ✓Landscape (MA% City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: March 21, 2001 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #28-99A OLD TOWN NORTH PDP — PILOT PROJECT — 90% SUBMITTAL — TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current Planning no later than the PILOT PROJECT MEETING scheduled for: April 5, 2001 (meeting time still to be determined) Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Old Town North (sheet 1 of 4) April 12, 2001 Site Plan 1. The utility plan show phasing - need to show the phasing on this plan. 2. What happened to Phases 2 and 3 — they are no longer shown on the site plan. 1. Provide necessary sight distance easements - I have marked them on the site plan. These may impact a few buildings slightly. 3. What are the lots with only alley frontage for? What is to be on these lots? If they are garages for other lots how are they going to be tied to the other lots? 4. Need to provide notes regarding the garage, building and fence set back requirements for the alley. Garage setback is to be 8 ft or 20 ft minimum. The fence set back requirement depends on the garage location. 5. Your mini details do not reflect alley set back requirements. 6. Need to indicate what side of the narrow residential street parking is allowed on. Show where the No Parking signs are to be — you are responsible for the cost of the initial placement of these. 7. Need a public turn around at the end of Alley L with Phase 1 as shown. 8. The drainage pipe crossing re -aligned Vine Drive needs to not run down the parkway. This interferes with landscaping and electric line placement in the parkway. 9. The Detail lot layout — need to show 8 ft or 20 feet minimum from the alley to the face of the garage. These are the two allowed setbacks. 10. How do you get compact parking spaces — what is the justification for this? If allowed needs to be signed. Show sign locations. (continued on next page) ? Name (please print) ?� CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIE936F REVISIONSi t _ ak rte _Drainage Report _Other `— -tlf�ility ALE line Utility �eandscape City of Fort Collins Old Town North (sheet 2 of 4 ) April 12, 2001 11. The lot lines and property boundaries are not shown correctly on the detail lot layout. 12. On the cross sections you have your cars driving on the wrong side of the road on the local streets. 13. See additional comments on the plans Plat 1. Need to indicate who is to own and maintain the Tracts and Blocks. 2. Put the easement label key on each sheet. 3. Easements B also need to be a fence set back line. 4. Provide sight distance easement language and show the easements on the plat. 5. Need to define the points where the easements change type. 6. Utility easements at a corner where the row is a radius also need to have a radius. 7. What are Block 1 and Block 2? Future Development? These need to be identified. 8. Need to indicate the alley and street widths. 9. Alley X appears to have a greater than 10 degree deflection with Street E (south side). This is not allowed. Correct. Can request a variance and it will be evaluated. The intersections of Alley X and Street F (both sides) may not be within the allowed deflection either show what the deflection is. If it is not within the limits, the same applies to them. 10. The parking area north of Street D off of alley Z would not be accepted as row. This is a private parking lot, parking is not allowed within the alley row. 11. Alleys are not named therefor on the final plat just indicate that they are alleys and not alley A, alley B etc. 12. Is the Park a private park? Label as such. 13. Show the off -site row that is needed for the connection of Street A to Vine. Label "off -site row by separate document" or include it within the plated limits. May also need off -site easements along here to get utilities to the site. 14. Showing a piece that needs to be acquired? How is this all going to work? There are some issues here. 15. What is existing row? Show what is existing along future realigned Vine Drive and Redwood Street. I don't think future non-existent row should be shown on the final plat, but that is up to Jim and Wallys determination. 16. See additional comments on the plans. Utility Plans 2. Provide necessary sight distance easements - I have marked them on the site plan. These may impact a few buildings slightly. 3. The box culvert plans were not received. We need to see these. They need to include notes regarding design and such. See attached for an example. 4. Provide striping plans for the no parking areas on the narrow streets and the striping on the collectors and arterials. 5. Alley X appears to have a greater than 10 degree deflection with Street E (south side). This is not allowed. Correct. Can request a variance and it will be evaluated. The intersections of Alley X and Street F (both sides) may not be within the allowed deflection either show what the deflection is. If it is not within the limits, the same applies to them. Phasing Plan 6. Isn't there a sidewalk connection that is needed along East Vine for this project? It is not shown - it needs to be shown on this and all sheets showing this area. 7. Show type III barricades at the end of the roads between Phases. 8. It will be easier to end the roadwork at a 90-degree angle to the row, please show as such instead of diagonally across the road. 9. Need to show the temporary connection that is to be made out to Vine for Redwood until CDOT moves out as this is a part of Phase 1. Utility sheets 10. It is not clear if some items are existing or proposed, please identify. 11. Showing an overhead powerline in Street A. What is happening with this? 12. One of he sheets showed a driveway at the south end of Street A, Where is this and what are you doing with it and the gate that is labeled? 13. Will need temporary turnarounds on Street F and Street E when Phase 2 is developed. Need to show these. 14. Are all the utilities being put in with Phase 1? No indication of Phasing of these is made. Don't see anything regarding the gas line - in fact the easement is not shown across the plat. 15. What are the limits of construction along future Vine Drive? What is to be built? Your Phase line juts into the street. 16. Where does the overhead powerline go that is shown dead -ending into Redwood? (continued on next page) Old Town North (sheet 3 of 4 ) April 12, 2001 17. Need to show the temporary connection of redwood to Vine. Street Sections 18. If you are going to provide potential pavement sections label them as such - "Potential Pavement Section" 19. Identify what the min parkway width will be on the modified Major Collector streets. 20. The alley sections - you can do these all concrete with the drain to one side design if you like. But per the standard detail it is a driveover curb on the low side not a v-pan. Why are they labeled as three different options when they appear to all be the same design other than width?? Plan and Profiles 21. Need to provide flowline profiles. 22. Provide Curb return information at all street and alley intersections. 23. Show the cross -pan locations on the profiles. 24. Provide intersection elevations in accordance with details D-18 and D-19. Intersection details are also needed for the alley street and alley alley intersections. 25. Label all sidewalk chases, culverts and inlets locations and indicate sizes. 26. Provide Key maps 27. Provide the design for the roadways adjacent to Phase 2 and for 500 It off -site in accordance with criteria. 28. Indicate the alley widths on the plan views and provide flowline slopes. You have the vertical curve info, but no slopes. 29. Don't quite understand how the drainage works on the alley system. It appears that there are several cross -pans that are needed as well as some curb openings that are not shown. 30. On Re -aligned Vine Drive is there no left turn at the intersection of SH287 and re -aligned Vine? This is what you are showing and it just seems odd. 31. Identify phase lines and limits of construction on these plans as well. Need to show how you are going to tie into existing grades at the end of Phases and/or development where the adjacent land is not at the same elevation as the proposed flowline. Easements maybe needed for this work. 32. The design for re -aligned Vine Drive does not meet min vertical curve requirements. This road is an arterial therefor the design speed is 50 mph. 33. Did not submit any variances for the design of Redwood Street. It doesn't meet standards and this was talked about. 34. Not showing what Phase 3 street construction is on Redwood. Need to show how the grading is tying in at the end of Phase I improvements if the whole site is not being graded with Phase 1. 35. What portion or portions of the bike trail are being removed and when. I assume that the trail or the street sidewalk needs to be in place. Show how this phasing is going to work. 36. The sidewalk needs to go around the power poles not through them. Is it a power pole that is located on the northwest comer of re -aligned Vine and Redwood? Use direct ramps at this corner and show how the walk goes around the pole. If it is not a pole what does this symbol mean. 37. Have a kink where the proposed improvements tie into existing Redwood. Remove the kink. If necessary remove some of the existing curb and gutter to provide a proper transition. Does the road narrow/ widen here? Why does this kink appear? At least some pavement removal will need to be done to get improvements to tie in. Show what is necessary. 38. What are the existing grades of Redwood that are being tied into? 39. If you are unable to put in the curb returns at Redwood and Vine, then temporary asphalt ramps are needed on both sides of Redwood to connect the sidewalk with the pavement in Vine. 40. Why is a ped ramp shown on Redwood across from Street E for only the temp street connection condition? Is there a reason why this shouldn't exist with the ultimate street improvements? 41. Street B - Is there a grading tie that is needed between Phases? What is to be built with Phase 3? If re -aligned Vine isn't built how does this site tie to existing grade. It would seem easements would be necessary. 42. Will need some additional road transitions that are not shown. 43. Is there a second walk provided on the north side of Street D for the homes that are on the other side of the green space? How do these walks have a connection to the public walk? 44. How does the water get off of the street at the 90-degree turn? And how does this work with the alleys. Also a 90- degree bend needs to be designed with an elbow with the cross section of the road being 36 feet at this point. Intersection details 45. On the one intersection detail provided -Provide elevations in accordance with details D-18 and D-19. Indicate the transition length unless it is standard, then can be shown on the detail, provide the elevation at the transition point. (continued on next page) Old Town North (sheet 4 of 4) April 12, 2001 46. Provide the rest of the details. Drainage Plan 47. Missing some pans that I think are needed in the alleys. 49. Don't show where the drainage is coming off of the alleys into the ponds. 49. It is not clear what is to be built with what Phase and how things then tie in. Details 50. Do not need the attached mid -block ramp details that you have provided, as you do not have any attached walk. Provide a detached mid -block ramp detail. 51. Provide mid -block cross -pan detail. The depth required for these is different than the ones following the flowline across an intersection. 52. Provide alley street intersection detail. 53. Provide sidewalk chase and culvert details. 54. Where is the driveway cut to be used? 55. Provide culvert notes with the culvert design. 56. See plans for additional comments. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 17, 2001 TO: �eG�Vl�j[pl� 1x1rV' (� MW C ; !Pra- PROJECT: #28-99B Old Town North —Project Development Plan - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: sub May 30, 2001 ElNo Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE Row REFERENCE** _y t-1 e � I E+/-hf t /4 S LT- M F n T 0t/6 T(—r 6,4 6,4Jcrme^,T I s t)M-Gvc,4T-A0C6-- A /T 7a SFFuw 014AT JAn.r of 1?T0W.uo ROW /S EXtJ7-/N7 9 W HAT- ?AA 1- IS Nc w . Cv,eve l64TA MI S S / N4 Tex SI aC /5 ]oo Srfi4c.4 ?a AT-- pRa'o"_'r jf //M�� /SS/A, f ���42/nl JT4Nce- I/Ufo DOR HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVI3I0N,1Signamre:_ L Pnat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other — Utility — Redline Utility — Landscape q Project Comments Sheet i�l Selected Departments Citv of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: June 6, 2001 PROJECT: OLD TOWN NORTH ODP - TYPE H #28-99B All comments must be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Dept: Engineering 3 No variance requests have been received. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 4 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Variance requests that are needed - Angle of intersection for a street (alley X) Redwood alignment, curves and tangents do not meet standards. Alley section - request to use a v-pan. For this request here is some information that needs to be considered and provided with this request. Will need to show that the 2-year storm stays within the v-pan/ row. Will need easements on private property adjacent to the alley for the 100-yr storm. Need information to know the width of this easement adjacent to all alleys, is it consistent width, does it vary. No fencing or structure will be allowed within these easements. Foundations will need to be 1 foot higher than the 100-yr level. 1 of 7 5 Site Plan Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff I. What are the lots with only alley frontage for? What is to be on these lots? If they are garages for other lots how are they going to be tied to the other lots? How are you identifying that the G lots are associated with the other lots and can not be sold separately and are for garage use only. Don't see anything on the site plan or the plat discussing parcel links. 2. Show the Temporary turnaround on Jerome. 3. Show the type III barricades that are to be placed at the end of the improvements. 4. Need to shade the sight distance easements or something. A homeowner /buyer is not going to notice them as shown. 5. Need to include the sight distance easement restriction language on the landscape plan. 6. The sidewalk on the east side of Blondel north of Osiander is being shown to be constructed on the utility plans. 7. Provide the ramps as shown across from the T intersections. 8. Do we need a ramp and midblock crossing for the trail? 9. Why is there no connection from this development to the Trail? 10. Where are the walls that are indicated on the utility plans around the detention pond? Need to show their location and limits. 11. I didn't receive a sheet 8 of 8. 12. Sheet 6 - the rear easements are utility, access and garage setback easements per the plat. 13. Need a note to indicate that the garage door setbacks are 8 feet or 20 feet min and that building setbacks from the alley are 8 feet min. 14. Need to indicate that the driveway flare shown as typical is typical for a 12 foot alley (the alleys differ in width and therefor the flares differ). 15. What material is the parking stall off of the alley to be built in. Probably should specify if you want them to be concrete. 16. Why aren't the head in parking stalls measured and shown form the row line instead of the back of the easement? Doing so would gain you some room on the lot and eliminate some additional pavement. 17. How do you get compact parking spaces -If allowed I believe these need to be signed. Show sign locations. 18. The alley section shown is not correct, the alley does not drain to the middle, but drains to one side. 19. See additional comments on the plans 2 of CC: bha@frii.com, Monica@ palladian-construction.com,... 6 Plat Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff L Need to indicate who is to own and maintain the Tracts and Blocks. 2. Why do you have light and power and AT&T Broadband signing the plat? I didn't see any easements dedicated to them. 3. Need an acceptance block for the Lake Canal. They need to accept the area as easement or accept the parcel if it is being dedicated to them. 4. The row radius at the intersection of the streets with New Vine need to be 9 ft radii min. 5. The sidelot 8-foot access easements need to be private access easements and need to indicate who they are to be owned by. The adjacent lot? I also thought that by stating that they are 8 foot easements that they were 8 feet on each side of the property line, but I don't think that is the case based on the site plan. Need to make sure that is clear. 6. Provide sight distance easement language. 7. Need to define the points where the easements change type. Response was that where the easement change occurs a different letter is presented. Okay, but that doesn't tell us where the easement actually ends. 8. Utility easements at a comer where the row is a radius also need to have a radius. Say they are now shown that way, but they are not. 9. Alley X appears to have a greater than 10 degree deflection with Street E (south side). This is not allowed. Correct. Can request a variance and it will be evaluated. The intersections of Alley X and Street F (both sides) may not be within the allowed deflection either show what the deflection is. If it is not within the limits, the same applies to them. 10. Need to provide information so that the temporary turn arounds can be located. 11. Will probably need to increase the text size. I can not tell what some of the numbers are and this is a pretty clear copy. 12. I don't believe that Tract F and KK are future development. I believe that it is the Dry Creek. 13. Need to indicate how some of the easements can be located. 14. Show the off -site row that is needed for the connection of Street A to Vine. Label 'off -site row by separate document or include it within the plated limits. May also need off -site easements along here to get utilities to the site. Response was that this is existing row. If it is existing that is no the way it is shown on the plat 15. Showing a piece that needs to be acquired? How is this all going to work? There are some issues here. Response was that this portion of land is owned by the City - no it is not owned by the City. be working on this. From what I understand Monica has bought the tax leans on this property. The attorneys need to 16. Where is the PSCo easement that cuts through the site? 17. Still need 8-foot utility easements on the south side of the alleys where the alley abuts the park. The same is true for the streets still need the 9-foot utility easements adjacent to the row where the road abuts the park. 18. Tract JJ needs to be dedicated as access easement. The LUC does not allow you to create a parcel that could control access to another parcel. 19. You may not wish to dedicate the alley now between Block 7 and Tract KK since any changes in the future to the row will require an action of council. 20. What is existing row? Show what is existing along future realigned Vine Drive and Redwood Street. I don't think future non-existent row should be shown on the final plat, but that is up to Jim and Wallys determination. 21. Need to show the off -site easements that are needed and indicate that they are to be provided by separate document. 22. Add a note to the plat that all vehicular access to lots is to be from the alleys - no vehicular access is allowed from the streets. 23. How are you identifying that the G lots are associated with the other lots and can not be sold separately and are for garage use only? 24. See additional comments on the plans. 3 of Utility Plans Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 1. Alley X appears to have a greater than 10 degree deflection with Street E (south side). This is not allowed. Correct. Can request a variance and it will be evaluated. The intersections of Alley X and Street F (both sides) may not be within the allowed deflection either show what the deflection is. If it is not within the limits, the same applies to them. 2. Provide two benchmarks. 3. See attached for the general notes associated with the new standards. Make changes as shown. You are missing the highlighted notes, please add those. We can give you a text file for these if you like. 8 Phasing Plan Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 1. Isn't there a sidewalk connection that is needed along East Vine for this project? It is not shown - it needs to be shown on this and all sheets showing this area. 2. Label future and interim redwood as appropriate. 3. Show the turnaround at the end of Alley L 9 Utility sheets Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 1. Typical water service detail (4-plex townhomes) the easement for the placement of these is not shown on the plat - that is if an easement is needed. 2. Indicating that the path connection out to College is future - it is not future it is to be built with this phase. 3. The gate at the driveway off of Jerome needs to be relocated. There needs to be a minimum of 20 feet from the gate to the flowline. The gate can not be placed at the back of the sidewalk it will need to be set in. This is a health and safety issue and not negotiable. 4. Need to clearly identify the vine pavement limits and the patch area. 10 Street Sections Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 1. Identify what the min parkway width will be on the modified Major Collector streets. How narrow does the parkway get? What is this min dimension? 2. The alley sections - you can do these all concrete with the drain to one side design if you like. But per the standard detail it is a driveover curb on the low side not a v-pan. Why are they labeled as three different options when they appear to all be the same design other than width?? See comments above regarding the use of a v-pan. 3. Why not put the redwood interim section on these sheets as well. 4 of 11 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Plan and Profiles 1. Need to provide flowline profiles. Have a couple of streets where flowUne profiles have not been provided. 2. Provide Curb return information at all street and alley intersections. 3. Show the cross -pan locations on the profiles. 4. Provide intersection elevations in accordance with details D-18 and D-19. Intersection details are also needed for the alley street and alley alley intersections. 5. Some elevations on the plan/profile sheets do not match the elevations on the details. 6. Label all sidewalk chases, culverts and inlets locations and indicate sizes. 7. Provide Key maps 8. Please show the ramps at the intersection of Re -aligned Vine and Redwood Street as directional as that is how they will be built in the future. 9. Provide the design for the roadways adjacent to Phase 2 and for 500 ft off -site in accordance with criteria. 10. Indicate the alley widths on the plan. 11. What are the existing grades of Redwood that are being tied into? 12. Show the patch in vine where redwood ties. 13. Need to show where the future ramp is on redwood across from Cajetan so that the curb gets built with the dip. 14. Add a note to indicate that protection is to be provided at the end of the pavement section (north end of redwood and east end of Osiander) to prevent undermining of the street section due to drainage running of the end. 15. Where are you ending alley L improvements? How is the turnaround going to be constructed? Materials? 16. The asphalt path adjacent to redwood should stay 10 feet in width and not narrow. 17. Where are the proposed parapet and wing walls at the ditch crossing on Jerome? Need to show what is to be concrete at this crossing, will there be a planted parkway or is that to be concrete and what are the limits. 18. Need to dedicate row to encompass the entire culvert structure. 19. Show a future ramp across from Osiander on Jerome so that the curb gets built with a dip. 20. The turnaround on Jerome - I believe that this should be compacted roadbase. 21. What does depressed curb look like? 22. Need to show the intersection transition for the Jerome and RE -aligned Vine intersection. 23. The midblock cross -pans - need to use min grades (.5%) for the flowline grades as they tie into the pan on each side. This needs to be for a distance adequate to meet vertical curve criteria. 24. How does Baum transition at Osiander? 25. The sidewalk at the comer of Heschel and Pascal should remain detached and use midblock ramps for the ramps at this comer. 26. 2 foot curb openings on the alleys - you are proposing no curb - so if that is approved you will need to address what is to be done in leu of a curb opening. 27. Need to make sure that the alleys from the back of walk to the street slope out to the street - as shown on the detail. 28. Need curve info on the alley plan and profile sheets. 29. Within the profiles you indicate a 6-foot pan at the intesection o f the alley with a street. It is not really a cross -pan as it would be one concrete section to the back of the sidewalk. 30. The profiles will be reviewed again once information on them has been updated. 5 of 12 13 14 15 16 17 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Intersection details 1. On the one intersection detail provided - Provide elevations in accordance with details D-18 and D-19. Indicate the transition length unless it is standard, then can be shown on the detail, provide the elevation at the transition point. Missing some elevations and a couple of transition lengths. 2. Provide additional intersection details as indicated on the sheet - the alley intersection information could possibly be provided on the plan/profile sheets as it is less info. 3. The points at the extensions of the flowlines for an intersection without a cross pan need to be .2 feet higher than the flowline elevation as to not create a low undrainable spot. 4. Need more information on the plan/profile to determine if these details match that design. 5. At the intersection of Pascal and Heschel what happened to the curb at the outer edge? Need to have a curb here as I have shown. Issue Contact. Sheri Wamhoff Striping plan 1. Need to indicate the widths of the bike and parking lanes. 2. Cajetan is a local street so parking can exist on both sides if desired. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Grading Plans 1. Label all sidewalk culverts. 2. Need easements for all grading and construction work that is outside the platted boundaries and not within the existing row. 3. You are not showing the trail that is shown on the site plan through the detention pond/ park. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Details 1. Will need the roll over curb and gutter detail if the variance request for the alleys is denied. 2. Make changes as shown to the alley intersection detail or use 8-12. 3. Make changes to the mid -block ramp detail as shown or you can basically use the direct ped ramp detail 16-41) 4. Provide dowel] detail (#4) 5. What does the trail look like? Width, pavement type, thickness, reinforcing? 6. See comments on the sidewalk culvert. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Culverts 1. Provide notes and details - see attached for sample notes. 2. Need to show where the parapet and wing walls are located, is it all straight do the wing walls come off at an angle? Show all that is concrete - we do not want small areas that are not maintainable. See additional comments on the plans 6 of Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff =��A •_ �- it x vu W 171 �:t7, '.CEi IVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat �_ Drainage Report _ Other ,,�Utility Redline Utility _:�dscape City of F� C� 7 of PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Plannine DATE: January 10, 2002 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #28-99C Old Town North Final Compliance - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff review meeting: February 6, 2002 Note - Please identify vour redlines for fixture reference 1 eaI uNzo44o ✓ LEGAL GGOSt; 4� U HA r L lfSc 4cti; iS �p v�0 . ll '' LJ/I�et^e_ jS ouhPr �ouYt�Qvt/., oT� �"�rrS P�a l` 10 CCa4� ,L, q GU Yi,`2. VG �L IS VYII SS�rg_ i . M o SII f CO vii -en kS �Yp rn get 30 gc�d,eSSe�. g, Mcttly Pr�%jeS— hve� �a See ac�at�. Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS{ , Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other `— _Utility _Redline Utility _,Landscape City of Fort Collim 6aProject Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Port Collins Department: Date: February 10, 2002 Project: OLD TOWN NORTH, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FC & MODIFICATIONS OF STANDARDS, 028-99A & 28-99C All comments must be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 06, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General 36 No variance requests have been received. 37 Variance requests that are needed Angle of intersection for a street (alley XI Redwood alignment, curves and tangents do not meet standards. Alley section request to use a v-pan. For this request here is some information that needs to be considered and provided with this request. Will need to show that the 2 year storm stays within the v-panl row. Will need easements on private property adjacent to the alley for the 100-yr storm. Need information to know the width of this easement adjacent to all alleys, is it consistent width, does it vary. No fencing or structure will be allowed within these easements. Foundations will need to be 1 foot higher than the 100-yr level. Topic: Site Plan 38 1. What are the lots with only alley frontage for? What is to he on these lots? If they are garages for other lots how are they going to be tied to the other lots? How are you identifying that the G lots are associated with the other lots and can not be sold separately and are for garage use only. Don't see anything an the site plan or the plat discussing parcel links. 39 1. Show the Temporary turnaround on Jerome. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Port Collins Department: Date: February 14, 2002 Project: OLD TOWN NORTH, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FC & MODIFICATIONS OF STANDARDS, #28-99A & 28-99C All comments must be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 06, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: box culverts 168 Provide CDOT details M-601-1, M-601-2 or M-601-3 and M-601-20 as applicable and needed. 169 Per a meeting on 2/8/02 at least the bottom of the box under Jerome will need to be cast in place. The whole box can be cast in place or only the bottom with a three -sided box attached to that. The sewer pipe under the culvert needs to be encased in concrete under the box and 1 the encasing needs to be structurally designed into the floor of the box structure. Provide a design for whatever portion of the box is to be cast in place. Provide copies of structural calculations for our files with the submittal. 170 Make sure notes provided reflect the design being provided. 171 Provide values for the structural backfill requirements. 172 What is the minimum elevation that occurs between the top of the box structure and the bottom of the curb and gutter section? What kind of clearance is above the box structure? Can the standard pavement section with sub base be provided above the box or does this area require a special design - potentially concrete? z -IY�02 Dare CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat y Site Drainage Report Other_ _X Utility y Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 173 For the box under Redwood, There needs to be separation (minimum distance to be determined by water wastewater) provided between the pipe casings and the bottom of the box or the bottom of the box will need to be designed so that the casing is enclosed in concrete and a part of the structural design of the box bottom. Topic: General 37 Variance requests that are needed - Redwood alignment, curves and tangents do not meet standards. Alley section -request to use a v-pan. For this request here is some information that needs to be considered and provided with this request. Will need to show that the 2-year storm stays within the v-pan/ row. Will need easements on private property adjacent to the alley for the 100-yr storm. Need information to know the width of this easement adjacent to all alleys, is it consistent width, does it vary. No fencing or structure will be allowed within these easements. Foundations will need to be 1 foot higher than the 100-yr level. This could be very impactive to the plans and the plat. 55 Variance has been received for Redwood Street and is under consideration. 92 The culvert work under Redwood can not be done until the condemnation for the property is complete and the City and/ or Monica owns the property. The timing of this may not work for the applicants schedule therefore we talked about providing a temporary second point of access until this construction work can be done. If this is to be done a plan showing the design, location and grading (if any) needs to be provided with this set of plans. A temporary emergency access easement is needed for the location of this drive on site and offsite if it is not within existing row and/ or an existing emergency access easement. All easements by separate document need to be signed, in acceptable format and received prior to acceptance of mylars for signature. 93 Need easements for all grading and construction work that is outside the platted boundaries and not within the existing row. All easements by separate document need to be signed, in acceptable format and received prior to acceptance of mylars for signature. 94 Showing a retaining wall on the west side of Jerome. On one sheet it indicates that the wall is to be 3-4 feet above grade where another sheet it shows it at grade. If it is at grade what is the purpose of the wall. If it is above grade then we will need to see a design of the wall due to the visibility of it. It will be important to know what it looks like. 95 The Lake canal needs to sign all sheets that show work affecting the canal. 96 See additional comments on the plans Page 2 Topic: Intersection details - 153 Provide information requested on Plans. 154 Missing some transition elevations and locations. 155 Add a note regarding transition elevation and where it is measured from. 156 Pascal Heschel intersection needs some work. Things are still not clear. Need some additional information, elevations and clarification. 157 For cross pans not located at a 4 legged intersection need to identify what portion of the curb is to be outfall and where the transitions occur and over what distance they occur. Need to provide a detail for an outfall curb and gutter with a 2-foot gutter. Then verify that these now work and that a low spot is not created. 158 Alley intersection details - Indicate the material, min slope and direction of slope for all parking spaces located adjacent to the alleys. Is the double line curbing? If so it needs to drop to a 0" curb height at its intersection with the alley. 159 Alley intersection details - Missing some information - some intersection information not yet provided. They have been marked. Topic: Phasing plan 97 Need to show that the off site sidewalk is to be build as a part of Phase 1. Also need to include the path connection and ultimate redwood street work within Phase 1. 98 Provide a design for the offsite sidewalk connection to college. Need something that shows where it is to be located and what elevations it is to be at. Will need easements for this if it is not constructed in the existing row. Topic: plan and profile sheets 102 Vine Dr (re -aligned) - The state does not allow drainage onto the state highway. The design needs to keep flows off the highway (Section 4.11(1) of the state highway access code. Will need to create a new low spot with inlets and piping. Page 3 MEETING MINUTES date: meeting No: date of meeting: location of meeting: project: present at meeting: subject: May 19, 2000 3 5-8-00 281 N. College Old Town North Bruce Hendee Cam McNair Monica Sweere Doug Martine Mark Jackson Peter Barnes Bob Blanchard Ward Stanford Dave Stringer Brian Shear Kim Kreimeyer Glen Schlueter Kathleen Reavis Eric Bracke Russ Lee Roger Buffington Schematic Design bha design, inc. Discussion Owner Moving realigned Vine onto Old town North's property and putting the drainage channel BHA, Palladian to the north of realigned Vine will accomplish the 660' access point requirement without reguiring channel crossings on Old Town North's property. If the channel is to remain on Old Town North's property, the box culverts will only need to handle 2900cfs. At channel crossings. 10 year release detention area may need to occur on the site. Shear Can an Improvement District be established for the maintenance of public green areas. Cam to research potential for GID Deed restrictions at a minimum will be needed to ensure the project will be "affordable" Palladian for at least 20 years A ground water analysis will be needed. Palladian A traffic impact study will probably be needed. Cam to talk with Traffic and confirm The following was established as a project schedule at the last meeting. *Schematic design submittal and sign off 6-5-00 *Utility coordination meeting 7-12-00 *50% design development submittal 8-7-00 *50% design development comments due 8-28-00 50% design sign off 9-4-00 *90% design development submittal 10-2-00 Planning and Zoning Board 11-16-00 FCP Submittal 12-15-00 FCP approval 1-15-00 * Indicates a team meeting 103 General - Have several locations where the elevations shown on the plan and profile sheet do not match the detail sheets 104 General - Provide Key maps 105 Redwood street - Are the parkway areas above the culvert to be grass? Is there enough cover above the box to support landscaping? 106 Redwood street - Provide flowline profiles. 107 Redwood street - Remove 'for reference only' this plan is not for reference only - this project is responsible for the construction of a portion of this street. 108 Redwood street - The design as shown does not provide adequate cover over the proposed dry creek box culvert. Need to change the profile so adequate cover is provided and/ or modify the culvert configuration to achieve adequate cover. 109 Redwood street - Design needs to meet minimum flowline grade requirements. As shown it does not. 110 Redwood street - What is the existing grade being tied into? Provide the information on the plan. 111 Interim redwood - Remove ultimate improvements and only show what is to be built as interim. 112 Interim redwood - Identify where the end of curb and gutter placement is with the interim. 113 Interim redwood - Provide elevations at the intersection with Vine. Where is the transition? What radii for pavement edge? Page 4 114 Interim redwood - Provide rip rap or some kind of protection at the end of the curb and gutter to prevent undermining due to drainage off the end. 115 Interim redwood - Don't provide a barricade across the NW sidewalk. It would block the trail connection. 116 Interim redwood - Add a note so that it is clear that the path connection to the north is to occur regardless of whether interim or ultimate phase 1 improvements are constructed. 117 Interim redwood - Make sure that `Potential' is in front of pavement section. 118 Jerome - Add note about the fence and gate setback at the outparcel. 119 Jerome - Have greater than allowed grade break. 120 Jerome - Show retaining wall if it is to exist. 121 Jerome - Show the barricades across Pascal and Cajetan being located right behind the cross -pan as this is where we want them located and they will place them where you show them. 122 Jerome - Need to indicate if you are building the corner ramps on the west side of the street. If you are you need to how barricades where the sidewalks would continue. 123 Jerome - Provide a detail of the depressed curbing. What does this look like? 124 Jerome - The vertical curves at the north end of the street do not meet design requirements. 125 Blonde] - End Phase construction line is shown incorrectly in the profile. Page 5 126 Blondel - Need to provide curb return information for the connection with re -aligned vine. 127 Cajetan - Intersection with Herschel, move ped ramp on the north side to the west side of the intersection to keep the pedestrian out of the drainage flows. Pan was not located here in prior submittals. 128 Cajetan - Remove barricade across sidewalk at redwood intersection. 129 Cajetan - Design for Cajetan west of Jerome needs to be provided in this set of plans and numbered as part of the set. It should be labeled as 'preliminary not for construction' though. 130 Cajetan - Can not add any drainage flows to College Ave., the street must slope away as soon as possible. Design needs to be adjusted. 131 Cajetan - What does the note end of typical section mean? 132 Cajetan - Missing some slope values and other information. 133 Baum - The ramp at the intersection with Osiander (north side) needs to be shown aligning with the ramp on the other side. 134 Baum - Provide a note indicating that the sidewalk and the ramp on the north side are future. 135 Osiander- Provide rip -rap at the end of the pavement section to prevent undermining of the curb and gutter and pavement. 136 Osiander- What do the grades do at the end of Phase 1 improvements? How do you tie into existing grade? Show and label. Page 6 137 Osiander- A point on the profile says to see intersection detail for this area. Why? All the detail shows is that the slope in this area is .50%. Why can't that be shown here? 138 Osiander- Missing a PCR elevation. 139 Pascal and Heschel - Design for the portion west of Jerome needs to be provided in this set of plans and numbered as part of the set. It should be labeled as 'preliminary not for construction' though. 140 Pascaland Heschel- Can not add any drainage flows to College Ave., the street must slope away as soon as possible. Design needs to be adjusted. 141 Pascal and Heschel - Need to show how this lines up with Woodlawn Drive across College Ave. 142 Pascal and Heschel - Provide curve info. 143 Pascal and Heschel - At intersection of Blondel provide a ramp on the west side of the intersection and move trail so that it aligns with the ramps. Ramps to be built on the south side of this intersection need to be built as close as possible to the sidewalk culverts so that they are close to aligning with ramps across the street. This would be a good location to place directional ramps. 144 Alley K- Minimum vertical curve requirements are not being met. Min K=20 for sag. 15 mph design. 145 Alley K- Identify the sta where the valley pan depression is to occur. 146 Alley K- Clarify the valley pan depression note. 147 Alley P- Identify the sta where the valley pan depression is to occur. Page 7 148 Alley L- Indicate end of phase 1 improvements. 149 Alley L- Show how this project will tie into existing grade at the end of the phase 1 improvements. Per conversation with stormwater a portion of the turnaround is in the floodway where changing existing grade is not allowed. Need to show how this turnaround works with the existing grades, how it ties in and what the slopes are. 150 Alleys general - Provide radius information for all curves including pavement edges. 151 Curb return profiles - Have a few places where things do not match the plan profile sheets. 152 Curb return profiles - Missing curb return information for: Blondel and re -aligned Vine and Redwood and Cajetan. Topic: Plat 72 Need to identify who is to own the private access easements. Easiest might be to reference the reception number for the filed document that contains the explanation. Monica said she had a three -page document that explained the easement that will need to be filed at the county. This should be filed and the document referenced on the plat by its reception number. 73 Need to define the points where the easements change type. Response was that where the easement change occurs a different letter is presented. Okay, but that doesn't tell us where the easement actually ends. Need to provide a line to define the boundaries. 74 Will need to increase the text size. I can not tell what some of the numbers are and this is a pretty clear copy. 75 Remove the label future development from Tract KK. It is misleading, as this parcel will probably never be developable. 76 You may not wish to dedicate the alley now between Block 7 and Tract KK since any changes in the future to the row will require an action of council. 77 What is existing row? Show what is existing along future realigned Vine Drive and Redwood Street. Page 8 78 Need to show the off -site easements that are needed and indicate that they are to be provided by separate document. 79 How are you identifying that the G lots are associated with the other lots and can not be sold separately and are for garage use only? - Add to note #7 All G lots are to be sold with the same numbered lot, no G lot shall be sold separately. Garage lots are for garages only no dewelling units can be provided on these lots. 80 Add the explanation paragraph to the sight distance easement. 81 A note on the plat indicates that all tracts are to be owned and maintained by the homeowners' assoc. A couple of the tracts are also labeled as future development areas. I doubt you want the homeowners to own those. 82 Why is there a note that says that the Jerome box culvert is to be owned and maintained by the homeowners' assoc.? It is a public street and thus would normally be maintained by the City. 83 Provide a radius for the easement intersection at the corners highlighted. 84 Jerome is a collector street and per the City Code (Section 24-91) the street name for all new collector and arterial streets shall be taken from an official approved list. Check with planning for the most current list. 85 Need to provide water easements as needed and shown on the utility plans and site plan. Not all have been provided at this time. 86 Lake Canal Company easement or row? Is this to be an easement - that is the way it is being shown, but is not the way it is labeled? If it is to be row then the area of the canal needs to be its own tract so it can be dedicated to the Canal Company. Row indicates ownership. 87 It appears that you are showing the dedication of a portion of existing Vine Drive. Was this section not part of the existing dedicated row? 88 Are their any utility easements that are needed adjacent to Jerome that need to be dedicated by separate document in order to get utilities to the site. 89 Have some easements that do not match what is shown on the site plan Page 9 90 Need to show existing redwood row, including where it exists out to Vine. 91 See additional comments on the plans. Topic: Site Plan 56 What are the lots with only alley frontage for? What is to be on these lots? If they are garages for other lots how are they going to be tied to the other lots? How are you identifying that the G lots are associated with the other lots and can not be sold separately and are for garage use only. Don't see anything on the site plan or the plat discussing parcel links. Add the same note that is to be on the plat onto the site plan. All G lots are to be sold with the same numbered lot, no G lot shall be sold separately. Garage lots are for garages only no dewelling units can be provided on these lots. 57 Need to include the sight distance easement restriction language on the landscape plan. Include the entire note - see attached for full note wording. 58 Where are the walls that are indicated on the utility plans around the detention pond? Need to show their location and limits. Utility plans now show a wall west of Jerome. 59 Need to indicate that the driveway flare shown as typical is typical for a 12 foot alley (the alleys differ in width and therefor the flares differ). Need to show this not shown on site plan or utility plans. 60 What material is the parking stalls off of the alley to be built in. Probably should specify if you want them to be concrete. Also need to know if there is to be curbing and which way they are to drain/slope. 61 Jerome is a collector street and per the City Code (Section 24-91) the street name for all new collector and arterial streets shall be taken from an official approved list. Check with planning for the most current list. 62 Need to show the retaining wall(s) on the site and landscape plan and label them. If this wall extends up above grade we will want to know what it is to look like. 63 Adjust the boundary of the project to encompass the off -site asphalt path, the Redwood Street improvements and the trail and path connections. 64 Make sure the ramps match those on the utility plans, some ramps locations changed due to the x-pan placement. Want to keep the pedestrian out of the drainage pans. Page 10 65 The edge of alley y is not shown as it is to be constructed on the utility plans. 66 Show the sidewalk on the east side of Redwood being constructed. 67 Some of the easements shown on the site plan do not match the plat or are not shown on the plat. I have highlighted those that I have noticed. 68 Make sure that in the blow up detail for the different kinds of lots that the building envelopes do not encroach into the easements. As shown they do. 69 There is not an easement for the parallel parking stalls adjacent to alley y and the stalls cross property lines. Should there be an easement here? 70 Need to show the trail by the pond being all constructed by this project. We do not want a 30- foot gap. I believe the portion that you say is off -site is on the property that will be a part of the future replat and thus a part of this property then. If not move the trail onto this property so that there is not a gap in the trail. 71 See additional comments on the plans Topic: utility plans 99 Master utility plan notes sheet - Typical service detail for a single-family lot says it is for lots 7-21, lots 7-21 of which block? 100 Master utility plan notes sheet - There is a note on the master utility plans that says that all utilities shown are to be installed with phase 1. Per the profile of line L a portion of it is not to be installed at this time, but it is shown on the master utility plan. 101 Master utility plan notes sheet - The pipe under Jerome for the Josh Ames ditch needs to be an elliptical pipe with tongue and groove fittings in order to provide for adequate clearance above the pipe for the street section. Hopefully this will do it. 160 Grading plans - Retaining wall is not shown on all the grading sheets. 161 Grading plans - Show all locations of rip -rap that were identified at the end of street improvements to protect the street end from undermining. Page 11 162 Details - Make changes to alley approach detail. 163 Details - Provide a type II barricade detail. It was referenced on the plans. Don't know what type this is - may not be acceptable. 164 Details - 'Replacing asphaltic concrete pavement on aggregate base' detail where did this come from? Use detail 22-1. It is current and correct. 165 Details - Need an outfall curb and gutter detail with a 2 foot pan for where the curb transitions out to outfall at the x-pans. 166 Details - Provide an asphalt sidewalk section. Is this sidewalk have a slope, what is the pavement thickness are there any design detail that need to be shown? 167 Details - Will need the roll over curb and gutter detail if the variance request for the alleys is denied. Page 12 T 14�rrt1 Notice Of Other Documents All Persons Take Notice That The Developer And/Or Owner Has Executed Certain Documents Pertaining To This Development Which Create Certain Rights And Obligations Of The Development, The Developer And/Or Subsequent Owners Of All Or Portions Of The Development Site, Many Of Which Obligations Constitute Promises And Covenants Which Run With The Land. The Said Documents May Also Be Amended From Time To Time And May Include, Without Limitation, The Development Agreement, Site And Landscape Covenants, Final Site Plan, Final Landscape Plan, And Architectural Elevations, Which Documents Are On File In The Office Of The Clerk Of The City Of Fort Collins And Should Be Closely Examined By All Persons Interested In Purchasing Any Portion Of The Development Site. * * * SPECL4L LANG UAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BY UTILITIES * * * SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT RESTRICTIONS (if applicable): (' Sight Distance Easement — The sight distance easement is an easement required by the City at v W some street intersections where it is necessary to protect the line of sight for a motorist needing to see approaching traffic and to react safely for merging their vehicle into the traffic flow. The following are requirements for certain objects that may occupy a sight distance easement for level grade: (1) Structures and landscaping within the easement shall not exceed 24 inches in height with the following exceptions: (a) Fences up to 42 inches in height may be allowed as long as they do not obstruct the line of sight for motorists. (b) Deciduous trees may be allowed as long as all branches of the trees are trimmed so that no portion thereof or leaves thereon hang lower than six (6) feet above the ground, and the trees are spaced such that they do not obstruct line of sight for motorists. Deciduous trees with \ trunks large enough to obstruct line of sight for motorists shall be removed by the owner. For non -level areas these requirements shall be modified to provide the same degree of visibility. VESTED RIGHTS STATEMENT: This final plat constitutes a s' specific development plan pursuant to Se ion 29-512 of to Code of the City of Fort Collins and creates a vested property right pursuan o Sections 29-512 through 29-517 of the City Code and pursuant to the provisionsofArticle 69, Title 24, C.R.S. Witness our hand�and seals this day of A.D., REVISION �`let- w COMMENT SIF' DATE: September 18, 2000 TO: Engineering PROJECT: ##28-99A Old Town North PDP — Type I - LUC All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: d d T El ffixproblems or Concerns (see below attached) No Comment "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" 9 Date: CHECK HERE IF Yob WISH To RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ Site Drainage Repod _ Other Ufty _ Redline Utility — Landscape Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: April 17, 2002 Project: OLD TOWN NORTH, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FC & MODIFICATIONS OF STANDARDS, #28-99A & 28-99C All comments must be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: April 10, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: box culverts 185 Provide copies of structural calculations for our files with the submittal 4/16/2002 Repeat Topic: General 55 Variance has been received for Redwood Street and is under consideration. 4/1612002 Repeat 92 The culvert work under Redwood can not be done until the condemnation for the property is complete and the City and/ or Monica owns the property. The timing of this may not work for the applicants schedule therefore we talked about providing a temporary second point of access until this construction work can be done. If this is to be done a plan showing the design, location and grading (if any) needs to be provided with this set of plans. A temporary emergency access easement is needed for the location of this drive on site and offsite if it is not within existing row and/ or an existing emergency access easement. All easements by separate document need to be signed, in acceptable format and received prior to acceptance of mylars for signature. 4/16/2002 Repeat 93 Need easements for all grading and construction work that is outside the platted boundaries and not within the existing row. All easements by separate document need to be signed, in acceptable format and received prior to acceptance of mylars for signature. 4/16/2002 Repeat 96 See additional comme is on the plans 4/16/2002 Repeat 71, ( `2 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat G Site Drainage Report Other. Utility X Redline Utility l Landscape Page 1 Topic: Intersection details - 153 Provide information requested on Plans. 4/16/2002 Repeat 154 Missing some transition elevations and locations. 4/16/2002 Repeat 155 Add a note regarding transition elevation and where it is measured from. The notes in your response letter were not added to the sheets. They would be fine once added to the sheets. 4/16/2002 Repeat 157 For cross pans not located at a 4 legged intersection need to identify what portion of the curb is to be outfall and where the transitions occur and over what distance they occur. Need to provide a detail for an outfall curb and gutter with a 2-foot gutter. Then verify that these now work and that a low spot is not created. 4/16/2002 Repeat 158 Alley intersection details - Indicate the material. min slope and direction of slope for all parking spaces located adjacent to the alleys. Is the double line curbing? If so it needs to drop to a 0" curb height at its intersection with the alley. 4/16/2002 Repeat Topic: Phasing plan 97 Need to show that the off site sidewalk is to be build as a part of Phase 1. Also need to include the path connection and ultimate redwood street work within Phase 1. 4/16/2002 Repeat 98 Provide a design for the offsite sidewalk connection to college. Need something that shows where it is to be located and what elevations it is to be at. Will need easements for this if it is not constructed in the existing row. 4/16/2002 Repeat Topic: plan and profile sheets 103 General - Have several locations where the elevations shown on the plan and profile sheet do not match the detail sheets 4/16/2002 Repeat 107 Redwood street - Remove 'for reference only' this plan is not for reference only - this project is responsible for the construction of a portion of this street. 4/16/2002 Repeat 116 Interim redwood - Add a note so that it is clear that the path connection to the north is to occur regardless of whether interim or ultimate phase 1 improvements are constructed. 4/16/2002 Repeat Page 2 118 Jerome - Add note about the fence and gate setback at the outparcel. 4/16/2002 Repeat 121 Jerome - Show the barricades across Pascal and Cajetan being located right behind the cross -pan as this is where we want them located and they will place them where you show them. 4/16/2002 Repeat 123 Jerome - Provide a detail of the depressed curbing. What does this look like? 4/16/2002 Repeat 126 Blondel - Need to provide curb return information for the connection with re -aligned vine. 4/16/2002 Repeat 134 Baum - Provide a note indicating that the sidewalk and the ramp on the north side are future. 4/16/2002 Repeat 145 Alley K- Identify the sta where the valley pan depression is to occur. 4/16/2002 Repeat 150 Alleys general - Provide radius information for all curves including pavement edges. 4/16/2002 Repeat 151 Curb return profiles - Have a few places where things do not match the plan profile sheets. 4/16/2002 Repeat 152 Curb return profiles - Missing curb return information for: Blondel and re -aligned Vine and Redwood and Cajetan. 4/16/2002 Repeat 205 Redwood - add notes - Tie bike path to street sidewalk. Type III barricade with phase construction. End phase 1 street construction. Repeat comment on plans 206 Interim redwood - a 2-foot patch will not meet standards. Just note that a patch to standards will be needed. Patch was not previously labeled. 209 Blondel - show how the end of improvements ties into existing grades. Page 3 211 Off -site Cajetan and Pascal - Add preliminary not for construction to the plans. This was on the sheets originally. 213 Alley L - need to show how the end of improvements tie into existing grade. What is the temporary turnaround to be, asphalt, rd base? Repeat comment on plans 214 Alley plan profiles - Add B1 to the legend. This is a new easement that was not a part of the plat or plans previously. Topic: Plat 72 Need to identify who is to own the private access easements. Easiest might be to reference the reception number for the filed document that contains the explanation. Monica said she had a three -page document that explained the easement that will need to be filed at the county. This should be filed and the document referenced on the plat by its reception number. 4/16/2002 Repeat 78 Need to show the off -site easements that are needed and indicate that they are to be provided by separate document. 4/16/2002 Repeat 79 How are you identifying that the G lots are associated with the other lots and can not be sold separately and are for garage use only? - Add to note #7 All G lots are to be sold with the same numbered lot, no G lot shall be sold separately. Garage lots are for garages only no dewelling units can be provided on these lots. 4/16/2002 Repeat We discussed this make changes as discussed. 88 Are their any utility easements that are needed adjacent to Jerome that need to be dedicated by separate document in order to get utilities to the site. 4/16/2002 Repeat 91 See additional comments on the plans. 4/16/2002 Repeat 197 Provide easements around the right-of-way stubs. No longer showing the row being platted to the west property boundary for Cajetan and Pascal. Without the row need easements in place for utilities to use if needed to serve this development. 198 Need to indicate that it is just the private easement that is a recorded easement and that somebody would need to see that document for the ownership description of the private easement. The public easements would need to be dedicated on the plat. 199 Need to show the off -site emergency access easement and indicate that it is to be dedicated by separate document. Page 4 200 Missing lines for the temporary emergency access easement within the property boundaries. 201 Tract b needs to be an access easement. Repeat comment on plans 202 Need to provide a drainage easement for the storm drain pipe at the SW corner of the property. It appears that this pipe is outside of the property boundary. Provide easements and /or move the pipe onto this property. Topic: Site Plan 56 What are the lots with only alley frontage for? What is to be on these lots? If they are garages for other lots how are they going to be tied to the other lots? How are you identifying that the G lots are associated with the other lots and can not be sold separately and are for garage use only. Don't see anything on the site plan or the plat discussing parcel links. Add the same note that is to be on the plat onto the site plan. All G lots are to be sold with the same numbered lot, no G lot shall be sold separately. Garage lots are for garages only no dewelling units can be provided on these lots. 4/16/2002 Repeat Didn't see any notes reflecting the tie between these lots on the plans. Topic: utility plans 161 Grading plans - Show all locations of rip -rap that were identified at the end of street improvements to protect the street end from undermining. 4/16/2002 Repeat 162 Details - Make changes to alley approach detail. 4/16/2002 Repeat 165 Details - Need an outfall curb and gutter detail with a 2 foot pan for where the curb transitions out to outfall at the x-pans. 4/16/2002 Repeat 166 Details - Provide an asphalt sidewalk section. Is this sidewalk have a slope, what is the pavement thickness are there any design detail that need to be shown? 4/16/2002 Repeat 203 Show the emergency access as a part of phase 1. 204 Add a note that the barricade is to be put in place once the emergency access easement is not longer needed. Add to overall utility plan and Jerome St. plan and profile. 207 Widen out Jerome as discussed. Page 5 208 Alley Y needs to connect out. Need to provide a paved connection from the alley out to a public street. This connection can be within the row or can go across the lots. A connection is needed in order for the lots that take access from this alley to be developed. Show how this is to be done on the plan and profile sheets, detail sheets and grading sheets. This connection needs to comply w/ stormwater criteria. This is the first time this non connection was shown. 210 Osiander - need to get the sidewalk put in place and as much curb and gutter as possible adjacent to lot 20 block 9. Need to have a finished edge in order to develop this lot. Don't need to put in the pavement that can be escrowed. This curb, gutter and sidewalk was previously shown being installed, this is the first time this has been shown this way. 212 Storm line A appears to be off the property boundary - on sheet 41 - where is the property line? Need to provide an easement for this if it is out side of the property boundary. Could also move the line onto the property and provide an easement for it there. 215 Still need some information to verify that off site easements are not needed for the drainage pipe on the east side of the site. Per my review of the information provided two small easements are still needed here. 216 Variances are under review 220 Major items still of issue at this time are: 1. Sidewalk connection out to College. Can this be accomplished across the Mr. Money site? 2. Off site easements needed. All offsite easements will be needed in final format prior to acceptance of mylars. A. 1 utility or drainage easement on the west side for the stromdrain pipe. B. 2 drainage easements on the east side for the culvert construction and for the connection of the strrmdrain pipe into the canal structure. C. Temporary emergency access easement. D. Temporary pedestrian access easement for sidewalk connection to college. 3. Alley Y connection to a street if the lots being served by it are to be developed. 4. What lot frontage improvements can be made adjacent to lot 20 block 9. Page 6 Engineering comments Wednesday, May 22, 2002 Comments on the alley Y and Blondel connection The City will not maintain the interim pavement section or the retaining wall. The developer will be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of these items. Need to provide a design for the timber wall or other retaining wall type of section to be placed. Need to provide a copy of the calculations for the design. The use of tiebacks or other structural measures are needed to ensure the long -tern stability of the design. A guardrail is needed at the end of Blondel. Provide a design and necessary details for this. Where the v-pan ties into the curb and gutter section. A raised edge/ curb needs to be provided behind the v-pan to help direct the flows into the gutter. This curb also needs to taper from the 6-inch height to a 0" height over a distance for safety concerns. Provide a raised asphalt curb on the north edge of the temporary connection. This will help to direct flow back to the street section. Comments on the dead end of Osiander Provide a 4:1 or flatter transition to existing grade. If this can not be done guardrail will need to be provided at the end of this street. Trail through pond design. The trail shall be 10 feet wide, have 5 inch thick fiber mesh in it and 2 lbs./ sack yosemite brown color. Contact Craig Forman for additional information at 221-6618 6�: AIM Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: July 2, 2002 Project: OLD TOWN NORTH, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FC & MODIFICATIONS OF STANDARDS, #28-99A & 28-99C Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General 93 Need easements for all grading and construction work that is outside the platted boundaries and not within the existing row. All easements by separate document need to be signed, in acceptable format and received prior to acceptance of mylars for signature. 4/16/2002 Repeat 7102/02 repeat 96 See additional comments on the plans 4/16/2002 Repeat 7/02/02 repeat 227 access easement. 228 7/02/02 Still need to receive a copy of the structural calculations for the timber retaining wall. Topic: Intersection details - 153 'Provide information requested on Plans.. 4/16/2002 Repeat 7/2/OL Vine and Jerome - delete the storm pipe and inlets that are no longer a part of the design. Provided elevations at the intersection of the flowlines on a couple of details as requested, but they are not high enough. Need to adjust these elevations so low spots are not created. Topic: plan and profile sheets 150 Alleys general - Provide radius information for all curves including pavement edges. 4/16/2002 Repeat 7/2 sheet 58 still one missinck 45L 0zdZ Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Topic: Plat 72 Need to identify who is to own the private access easements. Easiest might be to reference the reception number for the filed document that contains the explanation. Monica said she had a three -page document that explained the easement that will need to be filed at the county. This should be filed and the document referenced on the plat by its reception number. 4/16/2002 Repeat 7/2/02 Need to nut the reception m imhar nn tt.e nip# I'k;- ..�....__A_ ._ 91 See additional comments on the plans. 4/16/2002 Repeat 7/02/02 repeat 202 Need to provide a drainage easement for the storm drain pipe at the SW comer of the property. It appears that this pipe is outside of the property boundary. Provide easements and /or move the pipe onto this property. 7/2/02 The pipe was moved onto the nronertv and the i itiiity nione 231 232 Topic: utility plans 207 Widen out Jerome as 215 Still need some information to verify that off site easements are not needed for the drainage pipe on the east side of the site. Per my review of the information provided two small easements are still needed here. 7/02102 repeat 229 7/02/02 Insert the month and year on the cover sheet under the title 230 Page 2 9/29/00 Comments on Old Town North Schematic Design: The north -south collector street on the west side of Phase 1 will need to be constructed to connect with the existing Vine Drive, south of the project site, as part of Phase 1 of the project. Likewise, the portion of Redwood Street shown as "future Redwood Drive" at the SE corner of the project will need to be constructed with Phase 1, providing the two required access points. Some street oversizing reimbursement is available on collector streets. 2. The local street cost -share of the portion of the realigned Vine Drive that is adjacent to the project will need to be escrowed to the City, to be applied to the future construction of the new Vine Drive. The local street costs of the new Vine Drive can be paid in segments, as each phase of the project is permitted. 3. All of the streets and alleys must meet the City's standards for alignment, grade, tangent, section and sight -distance. At the schematic design stage, it is not possible to determine whether these standards are being met. However, several of the streets appear to be out of conformance with these standards. This will need to be addressed in more detail as design proceeds. 4. The traffic study incorrectly shows the future realigned Vine Drive intersecting with College Avenue at Hemlock Street. It should actually line up with Pinon Street. In fact, the entire context of the project site could be better portrayed by showing existing and future streets more completely. 5. The phasing sequence is different on the site plans and the utility plan. Is the commercial area Phase 2 or 3? 6. The correct name of East Vine Street is East Vine Drive. 7. The correct name of Redwood Drive is Redwood Street. 8. The scale on the site and landscape plans is labeled incorrectly. 9. The typical alley cross-section should show that the inverted crown alley as a concrete pavement. Also, the right-of-way (ROW) should be shown as 12-feet or the entire width of the alley pavement. Utility easements of 8-feet wide on each side of the alley ROW will also need to be dedicated to the City. END OF COMMENTS CAM From: Kathleen Reavis To: Dave Stringer, Ward Stanford Date: Mon, Oct 2, 2000 4:16 PM Subject: Old Town North Dave & Ward, Just wanted to touch base with you both prior to our meeting with the Old Town North project group tomorrow. Upon our review of the Traffic Impact Study for this project, there are some major issues that they to address in either a re -write of the TIS or via supplemental report. For example, the TIS did not make any attempt to address the North College/US 287 Access Management Plan. The TIS incorrectly projected the future roadway and intersection conditions along North College. LS&C shows the future re -aligned Vine Drive connecting to North College at Hemlock rather than at the correct location at Pinon. They do not take into consideration that N. College/Vine/Pinon is a planned future signalized intersection nor do they take into account that Alpine and Hemlock will be right-in/right-out only and Woodlawn will be two 314 movements. They are also not showing the planned local streets that go east/west between North College and the new north/south collector street. One of these should align with Alpine the other one should align with Woodlawn. The TIS also identifies Redwood as a 2 lane arterial - it is a collector on the Master Street Plan and realigned Vine is a 4 lane arterial on the MSP. They also need to clarify that "old"Vine will be a minor arterial only between N. College and Redwood, then it becomes a local street to the east. The TIS does not make any mention of the ped, bike, and transit LOS analysis. Again, our recommendation is to not accept this TIS or have a major re -do. Regarding the site plan, the North College Access Management Plan and the prior North College Corridor Plan both show the local commercial street that aligns with Woodlawn extending eastward from N. College to connect to the future re -aligned Vine Drive or to Redwood. The site plan does not show this, instead it shows the local street becoming a "narrow local" which will diminish its ability to carry through traffic to realigned Vine or to Redwood. That's it for now - Please let us know your thoughts so we can all get on the same page prior to our meeting tomorrow. Thanks. KR CC: Eric Bracke, Mark Jackson Meeting Minutes / Action Items Date: 10/03/00 Old Town North ATTENDEES OF 10/03/00 MEETING: Bruce Hendee, Monica Swear, Brian Shear, Russell Lee, Dave Stringer, Cam McNair Doug Moore, Kim Kreimeyer Ward Stanford, Glen Schlueter Peter Barns, Troy Jones Roger Buffington, Kathleen Reavis Mark Jackson, Jeff Hill Mike Phelan Meeting Overview: • The 20% Schematic Design submittal was reviewed and discussed. • Alleys can be public • The North College Access road will be allowed on street parallel parking. • The Traffic Study will need to be revised. • Wetlands will need to be mitigated at 1-1.5 ratio • The through street will change to the street aligning to future Alpine Drive. This street will be a residential local. • Alleys can be used with residential local streets. • There will need to be a 50' buffer from existing wetlands and native trees along the south property line. The following action items were derived from this meeting. Action Items Item Description Action Owner Status Due 1.00 Can blocks lengths be over 660' if BHA to meet with Ron Gonzales BHA Open 11/27/00 they are broken with alleyways or pedestrian walkways. 1.01 Can the detention release into Set up meeting with the Lake Canal Monica Open 11/27/00 Lake Canal.. Company Sweere, Shear 1.02 Revise plan to change through BHA to revise plans. BHA Open 11/27/00 road to the south. 1.03 To,homes need to have two off BHA to revise plans BHA Open 11/27/00 street parking spaces per unit 1.04 Confirm the location of driplines Trees need to be surveyed Monica Open ASAP of trees along the southern border Sweere of the site Traffic study will need to be BHA and LSC to set up scoping BHA, LSC Open ASAP revised meeting with Ward and Kathleen An alternative compliance will BHA to Draft. BHA Open 11/27/00 need to be submitted if the 660' connectivity requirement is not met. A preliminary utility coordination Brian Shear and Dave Stringer to Brian Open 11/27/00 meeting needs to be held prior to coordinate meeting at 40% completion Shear, 50% submittal of engineering drawings Dave Stringer END OFACTIONITEMS LIST Important Dates: November 27`h: Submittal of the 50% design development plans December 181h 1:30 pm.: 50% design development review meeting at 281 North College Meeting Minutes / Action Items Old Town North ATTENDEES OF 12/14/00 MEETING: Bruce Hendee, Monica Swear, Brian Shear, Russell Lee, Dave Stringer, Cam McNair, Ward Stanford, Tom Dugan, Glen Schlueter Peter Barns, Troy Jones, Kathleen Reavis Mark Jackson, Jeff Hill Mike Phelan, Don Magnisum, Rodney(with Lake Canal) Meeting Overview: • The 50% Design Development submittal was reviewed and discussed. • Lake Canal issues were discussed • Pedestrian access will be required to tie in with existing pedestrian system. • The Traffic Study will need to be revised. • Wetlands will need to be mitigated. Wetland mitigation may occur within the detention area • Confirm realigned Vine Drive alignment is correct • Utility coordination meeting will need to occur soon to determine feasibility of lot sizes • Side yards along residential streets and alleys will need a modification to be less than 15 feet The following action items were derived from this meeting. Date: 01/02/00