Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOLUMBINE EAST LONG TERM CARE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-01-31I PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: March 8, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #11-05 Columbine East Long Term Care PDP, 4824 S. Lemay, Type II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: March 30, 2005 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) I, $" Vc>Ak', ONE SFit01NG. 4E4,0L. 3, �r t`f✓ /y c,e . r;� Sic �y > C� Tye, Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Number: 3 Created: 3/18/2005 [5/10/051 Repeat: [3/18/05] All plans need to meet the scannability requirements in LCUASS appendix E. Questions about scanability can be directed to JR or Tim in Technical Services. Number: 4 Created: 3/18/2005 (5/10/05] See comment 22. [3/18/05] The driveway onto Rule Drive should be a standard cut, not radius style. Number: 18 Created: 3/18/2005 [5110/051 This item was not included in the variance request as stated In the responses to comments. It still needs to be addressed, either by reducing the radii on the plans or requesting a variance. [3/18105] The standard radius for the driveway onto Lemay is 20', not 25'. Number: [5/10/05) [3/18/05] 21 Created: 3/18/2005 Please see redlines and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. Number: 22 Created: 3/18/2005 [5/10/051 The variance request letter still does not address all of the required elements needed to justify the variances. Please review LCUASS 1.9.4 and include all required elements. Mike Herzig will be glad to meet with you to further explain what is needed. One key item is that you, as a PE, need to explain why, in your professional opinion, the variance request should be supported, and if it has any effects on public health, safety, and welfare, City maintenance costs, and design life. It is not enough to say that certain City staff thinks it is ok, therefore it is ok. It is fine to reference outside materials (i.e. the letter from the planner regarding the sidewalk), but the engineer must still provide analysis and a recommendation. Also, please remove the setback item - it is a planning item and is not covered in LCUASS. [3/18/05] The variance request for driveway separations on Lemay needs to be rewritten - it NEEDS TO ADDRESS OAK RIDGE to the north, and the church driveway to the northwest, which is very close to this proposed drive cut. Safety, health, and welfare of the public needs to be addressed as well, and the request needs to be stamped. It might be helpful to review LCUASS 1.9.4 for the items needed in a variance request. It is the City's intent to grant the variance once the revised request is received. Number: 49 Created: 5/10/2005 (5/10/051 It appears that the proposed offsite easement will overlap an existing structure. This is not permitted. Please revise the easement. Number: 50 Created: 5/10/2005 [5110/05] Please explain why holes are proposed in the metal coverings for the sidewalk culverts. Number: 55 Created: 5/13/2005 [5/13/051 The letter of intent for the offsite easement and the revised variance requests must be submitted no later than June 2nd. Number: 56 Created: 5/13/2005 Page 2 [5/13/05] A letter regarding the drainage pan just offsite on the southeast comer of the site was sent to the adjacent neighborhood. What were the results of that? Topic: Plat Created:3/18/2005 Number:11 [5/10/051 Is a private access easement really necessary? [3118/051 Please show all easements on the plat. Page 3 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: March 8, 2005 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #11-05 Columbine East Long Term Care PDP, 4824 S. Lemay, Type II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: March 30, 2005 Note -_Please identify your redlines for future reference 0 No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Name (please CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other, _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape in of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: March 29, 2005 Project: COLUMBINE EAST LONG TERM CARE PDP, 4824 S LEMAY AVE, TYPE All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: March 30, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: Drainage Number: 12 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Approximately 25% of the site is shown to drain to the driveway to Rule and over the public sidewalk onto the street. This is not allowed. The water must be diverted, perhaps to an under -walk drain, so that it does not cross the walk. Does this water need to be treated? Number: 14 Created: 3/18/2005 (3/18/05] Please use the standard under -walk drain from the pond onto Rule - straight chase (no bends) and only 2' wide unless otherwise approved by Stormwater. Also, the metal covering should extend from 2' behind the walk out to the curb, per the detail. Number: 15 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] The offsite work shown northeast of the project - are there existing easements to accommodate this? Please show/label/include the reception number of these easements, or provide a letter of intent from the adjacent property owners to dedicate needed easements. Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] The sidewalk along Lemay should be located at the back of the ROW, as opposed to meandering in the middle of the parkway. Also, the new street trees should be located in the ultimate parkway, approximately S from the edge of the walk when it is placed against the ROW. Signature 2 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility = Landscape Page 1 Number: 3 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/051 All plans need to meet the scannability requirements in LCUASS appendix E. Questions about scanability can be directed to JR or Tim in Technical Services. Number: 4 Created: 3/18/2005 (3/18/051 The driveway onto Rule Drive should be a standard cut, not radius style. Number: 5 Created: 3/1812005 [3/18/051 The proposed 10' utility easement on Lemay still needs to be approved by XCEL. Number: 6 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/051 The portion of the sidewalk on Rule that is located outside of the ROW needs to be placed in a public access easement on the plat. Number: 7 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Parking setbacks (LCUASS Chp 19) need to be met from both Rule and Lemay. On Lemay, the first parking stall should be no closer than 75 feet from the Lemay flowline. On Rule, the first parking stall should be no closer than 50' from the Rule flowline. Number: 8 Created: 3/18/2005 (3/18/05] On the site plan, please label existing ROW widths for Lemay and Rule, and proposed parkway widths. Number: 18 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] The standard radius for the driveway onto Lemay is 20', not 25'. Number: 19 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Driveways should be concrete to ROW line. If the concrete is extended beyond that, an expansion joint should be provided at the ROW line. Number: 21 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Please see redlines and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. Number: 22 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] The variance request for driveway separations on Lemay needs to be rewritten - it needs to address Oak Ridge to the north, and the church driveway to the northwest, which is very close to this proposed drive cut. Safety, health, and welfare of the public needs to be addressed as well, and the request needs to be stamped. It might be helpful to review LCUASS 1.9.4 for the items needed in a variance request. It is the City's intent to grant the variance once the revised request is received. Number: 27 Created: 3/29/2005 (3/29/05] It appears that a segment of the proposed stormwater line offsite (northeast corner) is not within an existing easement. Please provide a letter of intent from that property owner prior to scheduling a hearing, and the completed deed must be submitted prior to mylars. Number: 28 Created: 3/29/2005 [3/29/051 Please see redlines for any additional comments. Page 2 Topic: Grading Number: 13 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/051 The grades in the ROW and across the sidewalk appear to be too steep to meet ADA for the sidewalk (2% cross -slope) and the slope requirements for 2' each side of walk (2%). The maximum slope in the ROW is 4:1. Anything above that would require a retaining wall, which would require an engineering variance, which would not be looked upon favorably. Number: 16 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/051 Offsite grade lines should be shown for at least 50' offsite. Number: 17 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Please provide vertical detail(s) of retaining walls. Topic: Plat Number: 9 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Please use most current plat language (see attached). The language shown is several years old. Number: 10 Created: 3/18/2005 [3118/05] The emergency access easement should be dedicated only in the drive aisle and no parking areas/landscaping/curb/etc. should be within that easement. Number: 11 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Please show all easements on the plat. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 20 Created: 3/18/2005 [3/18/05] Show approximate street cuts and add note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Page 3 N Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Citpof Fort Collins Date: March 30, 2005 Project: COLUMBINE EAST LONG TERM CARE PDP, 4824 S LEMAY AVE, TYPE II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: March 30, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Kurt Ravenschlag Topic: Transportation Number: 40 Created: 3/29/2005 [3/29/05] A direct pedestrian walkway to Lemay Ave. along the north side of the building is highly recommended. Signature 3 _ , Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat. Site Drainage Report Other —�-Utility o,:. Redline Utility =Landscape Page 1 REVISION CitVof Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: April 27, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #11-05 Columbine East Long Term Care PDP All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: May 11, 2005�� Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 2 Ll A1oT AJacx) /f&(j .,k Jv: r LG i 37 / 1 . tiL� Ca %z. ' cC. 41 1,/ �-�R�r,� l_)ccS 1W7- �ucu�,r ��z Sm-4� 412e,,g ur �ji,t1 bc4) C9TCSIi At 5«l Goi21Jr'2 of Wfa L.LY Name Weasel /Z S/d 9 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 1 Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Date: May 10, 2005 Project: COLUMBINE EAST LONG TERM CARE PDP, 4824 S LEMAY AVE, TYPE II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: May 11, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Kurt Ravenschlag Topic: Transportation Number: 53 Created: 5/10/2005 (5/10/05] The intersection at Lemay Avenue and Rule Drive along the front of your site indicates directional ramps, which are to standard, that align with radial ramps to the south and west. This creates an awkward maneuver and could be mitigated by moving the directional ramps closer together to reduce the offset currently created. Signature Date f CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landsca e P Page I Irigol Project Comments Sheet �i�ofF Selected Departments Date: May 13, 2005 Project: COLUMBINE EAST LONG TERM CARE PDP, 4824 S LEMAY AVE, TYPE II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: May 11, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: Drainage Number: 15 Created: 3/18/2005 [5/10/05] 1 received a draft of an easement (for detention pond installation and maintenance- a temporary construction easement and a permanent maintenance/repair easement), a sketch of a proposed easement (for a "storm sewer easement" which doesn't seem to be included in the previous easement language), and a legal for that easement (but titled as a "construction easement"). To go to hearing, a letter of intent from the adjacent property owner(s) stating that they intend to dedicate the necessary easements for this project to go forward, is still required. Also, please provide all the exhibits referenced in the draft easement so that we can understand what is being proposed. This offsite easement will need to be public, too. I have attached the City's standard deed of dedication for an easement (with P and Z acceptance). Please use this language for the offsite easement. [3/18/05] The offsite work shown northeast of the project - are there existing easements to accommodate this? Please show/label/include the reception number of these easements, or provide a letter of intent from the adjacent property owners to dedicate needed easements. Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 3/18/2005 [5/10/051 See comment 22. [3/18/05] The sidewalk along Lemay should be located at the back of the ROW, as opposed to meandering in the middle of the parkway. Also, the new street trees should be located in the ultimate parkway, approximately F from the edge of the walk when it is placed against the ROW. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ C Site Drainage Report _ Other UIr (P Le V_ Utility _�C Redline Utility _,k,� Landscape dust Page I