The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIGDEN FARM FILING SIX LOT M5 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2006-08-15_CIA oa�c!t�i Both lots Currently the approved plans do not show water and sewer services to these lots. The original plans need to be revised to show the service locations as proposed. Lot MI Building overhand and footings can not extend into easements. This looks like it might be of concern on building 1 and building 3 on Lot MI. The walls of the buildings look like they are right of the easement line — which probably means the building eaves/ overhand will extend into the easement. Lot MI Might be worthwhile to talk to Melody on whether they plan on submitting plans for the shared driveway that would cross the western end of Lot MI adjacent to building 1. The driveway as shown for building 1 probably does not work (would exceed allowable driveway width) unless we know that a shared drive is not planned. If a shared drive is not planned — it would be best to look at vacating the shared easement and then this property would have more space to use. Otherwise - we need to look at flipping the building or a way in which we won't have a conflict with the shared driveway. Both lots Need to have water/wastewater review the landscape plans to verify that the tree placement and separation from utilities is acceptable. On the revised utility plan sheets provided for review. Sheet 28 — don't see a need for this sheet to be revised. Neither lot is on it. Sheet 29 — Need to coordinate with Tetra Tech they have a revision to this sheet that is already in review. Have them incorporate your revisions or you can revise the sheet one their revisions are approved. Missing the bubbles — all areas that have been changed need to be bubbled. Sheet 29A — Need to bubble the change shown. Sheet 44 - Need to coordinate with Tetra Tech they have a revision to this sheet that is already in review. Have them incorporate your revisions or you can revise the sheet one their revisions are approved. Missing the bubbles — all areas that have been changed need to be bubbled. Sheet 45 - Need to coordinate with Tetra Tech they have a revision to this sheet that is already in review. Have them incorporate your revisions or you can revise the sheet one their revisions are approved. Missing the bubbles — all areas that have been changed need to be bubbled. Sheet 45A — Need to bubble the change shown. U:\PROJECTS\rigden 6\MA05009.doc PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: May 19, 2005 TO: Technical Services f # 56-98AF Rigden Farm 6th Filing, Replat of Lots M1 and M5 All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: June 8, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) I, 3o-u�DAe�l:s caos�. Z. ACREAGE OnJ SHEET 1 vo�5 vor m/9stN �r/HAT p/� /,'�9LG�GArSD• a(L T,y�.vK Tti T iS /Ys �f /c�Y i Qum T/i!� — G,%lG. f , Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF Y WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 4—Ffat _ ite _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins REVISION SHEET DATE: May 20, 2005 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Utility Plans for #56-98AF Rigden Farm 6th Filing, Replat of Lots M1 and M5 and MA05009 ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff All comments must be received by: June 8, 2005 ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concems (see below or attached) Comments: 6113105 On the revised utility plan sheets provided for review. Sheet 28 —1 don't see a need for this sheet to be revised. But if you want to revise it you need to include the previous 4 revisions that have been made to this sheet U:IPROJECTSIrigden 6Vots M1 M5 rev.doc Comments from other departments on the site, landscape and utility plans put in DMS not the MA location Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 5/24/2005 [5/241051 Developer will need to coordinate the electric layout with Light and Power and the other utlities. Show electric on utility plans. Contact Light and Power to initiate a design for the electric. Gas must maintain a 5' separation from electric and must be on opposite lot comers. Water and sewer must maintain a 10' separation from electric. Number: 2 Created: 5/24/2005 [5/24/051 Normal electric development charges and policies will apply. Department: Water Wastewater issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 5 Created: 6/312005 16/3/051 No comments on the plat, however the landscape plan needs to have note 13 corrected to read "Tree locations shall have a minimum separation of 10 feet between water or sewer lines". Maintain this required landscape/utility separation distance on the landscape plans. See plat and landscape plans for other comments. 4 Date: 1 d5 Signature: 6' wo-m d PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS UV ❑ Plat 0 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS Project Comments Sheet rt Co ins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: June 10, 2005 Project: RIGDEN FARM, 6TH FILING, REPLAT OF LOTS M1 & M5 All comments must be received by Steve OR in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 08, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: Stormwater Number: 9 Created: 6/10/2005 [6/10/05] Comments from technical services 1. Boundaries Close 2. Acreage on sheet 1 does not match what we calculated for lot M5 3. 1 think that this needs a unique title -it is confusing to have a final plat of lot M5 as this is also a replat of M5 - same goes for M1 4. Identify how chase drive was dedicated. Number: 10 Created: 6/10/2005 [6/10/05) On plat for M5 - provide sidelot utility and drainage easements as needed and indicated by sormwater. Signature 01/O O� Date /CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ✓ Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page I REVISION COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: September 8, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt #56-98AF Rigden Farm, 6th Filing, Lots M1 & M5 Replat— Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: September 21, 2005 -j� Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1.3ovN�FtK�ES CG.oSE. Z, S?PrTEMS,JT oF-DEDiCATiotil o,j 6aiw PcPTs Do n)OT rnA7-6N -f-H flTGE. �?_iGnr -Po ej�F— ( IVA,4it6 rev 4ZI 7�1.47LES i j iS �gWOL[t, �I144�' I6 Name (pleasprint) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS flat _Site _Drainage Report _Other ift _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape c;cr of H=co Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: September 23, 2005 Project: RIGDEN FARM, 6TH FILING, REPLAT OF LOTS M1 & M5 All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 21, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Number: 18 Created: 9/23/2005 [9/23/051 The statements of dedication on both plats do not match the title. Number: 19 Created: 9/23/2005 [9123/05] Make sure that the correct project name is in all places where it is shown. Number: 20 Created: 9/23/2005 [9/23/05] Coffee parkway was recently renamed William Neal Parkway — please change on the plat documents. Number: 21 Created: 9/23/2005 [9/23/051 Light and power needs utility easements provided along the lots lines to serve the 3 single family lots (#1). Signature 9/Z 3�D,S Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1