HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM FILING SIX LOT M1 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2006-08-15inc n -r-ak rYl Gk,�A
C�A-oi�
Both lots
Currently the approved plans do not show water and sewer services to these lots. The
original plans need to be revised to show the service locations as proposed.
Lot MI
Building overhand and footings can not extend into easements. This looks like it might
be of concern on building 1 and building 3 on Lot Ml I. The walls of the buildings look
like they are right of the easement line — which probably means the building eaves/
overhand will extend into the easement.
Lot M 1
Might be worthwhile to talk to Melody on whether they plan on submitting plans for the
shared driveway that would cross the western end of Lot M1 adjacent to building 1. The
driveway as shown for building 1 probably does not work (would exceed allowable
driveway width) unless we know that a shared drive is not planned. If a shared drive is
not planned — it would be best to look at vacating the shared easement and then this
property would have more space to use. Otherwise - we need to look at flipping the
building or a way in which we won't have a conflict with the shared driveway.
Both lots
Need to have water/wastewater review the landscape plans to verify that the tree
placement and separation from utilities is acceptable.
On the revised utility plan sheets provided for review.
Sheet 28 — don't see a need for this sheet to be revised. Neither lot is on it.
Sheet 29 — Need to coordinate with Tetra Tech they have a revision to this sheet that is
already in review. Have them incorporate your revisions or you can revise the sheet one
their revisions are approved. Missing the bubbles — all areas that have been changed need
to be bubbled.
Sheet 29A — Need to bubble the change shown.
Sheet 44 - Need to coordinate with Tetra Tech they have a revision to this sheet that is
already in review. Have them incorporate your revisions or you can revise the sheet one
their revisions are approved. Missing the bubbles — all areas that have been changed need
to be bubbled.
Sheet 45 - Need to coordinate with Tetra Tech they have a revision to this sheet that is
already in review. Have them incorporate your revisions or you can revise the sheet one
their revisions are approved. Missing the bubbles — all areas that have been changed need
to be bubbled.
Sheet 45A — Need to bubble the change shown.
U:\PROJECTS\rigden 6\MA05009.doc
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
Current Planning
DATE: May 19, 2005 TO: Technical Services
1 # 56-98AF Rigden Farm Oh Filing, Replat of Lots M1 and M5
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting: 1
�V
June 8, 2005
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
1, a��D�re�ss cr,os£.
z �G(LEAGE OnJ SHEET 1 'po�5 NOT M/9.rCll WN197- !IC' G'AGGo/LATCb, e 4Z-
4Z�
fl _r 5-q��� F�✓�
�, 7'�`� /�✓`IS cl�'�1,5eG 17�U/r� 1%/G�f i �� -� Z—
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF Y WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
�Ffat _ ite _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
ift
City of of F
SHEET
DATE: May 20, 2005 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: Utility Plans for #56-98AF Rigden Farm 6th Filing,
Replat of Lots MI and M5 and MA05009
ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff
All comments must be received by: June 8, 2005
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Comments:
6/13l05
On the revised utility plan sheets provided for review.
Sheet 28 — I don't see a need for this sheet to be revised. But if you want to revise it you need to include the
previous 4 revisions that have been made to this sheet.
U:tPROJECTSVigden 610ts M1 M5 rev.doc
Comments from other departments on the site, landscape and utility plans put in DMS not the MA
location
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore
Topic: General Number: 1 Created:5l2412005
[5124/05] Developer will need to coordinate the electric layout with Light and Power and the other utlities. Show electric
on utility plans. Contact Light and Power to initiate a design for the electric. Gas must maintain a 5' separation from
electric and must be on opposite lot corners. Water and sewer must maintain a 10' separation from electric.
Number: 2 Created: 5/24/2005
[5/24105] Normal electric development charges and policies will apply.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: General
Number: 5 Created: 613/2005
[6/3/05] No comments on the plat, however the landscape plan needs to have note 13 corrected to read "Tree locations
shall have a minimum separation of 10 feet between water or sewer lines". Maintain this required landscape/utility
separation distance on the landscape plans.
See plat and landscape plans for other comments.
M 14 Date: Ll !J dS Signature: '�"�
VV
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
0 Plat 0 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
Project Comments Sheet
Citv of Fort Collins
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: June 10, 2005
Project: RIGDEN FARM, 6TH FILING, REPLAT OF LOTS M1 & M6
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
June 08, 2005
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 9 Created: 6/10/2005
[6/10/051 Comments from technical services
1. Boundaries Close
2. Acreage on sheet 1 does not match what we calculated for lot M5
3. 1 think that this needs a unique title -it is confusing to have a final plat of lot M5 as this is
also a replat of M5 - same goes for M1
4. Identify how chase drive was dedicated.
Number. 10 Created: 6/10/2005
16/10/051 On plat for M5 - provide sidelot utility and drainage easements as needed and
indicated by stormwater.
Signature
*10 O.<—
Date
HECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
Current Planning
DATE: September 8, 2005 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt
#56-98AF Rigden Farm, 6th Filing, Lots M1 & M5 Replat—
Type I
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff
review meeting:
September 21, 2005
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
No Problems
[Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
I.3o„N�.rz�><s ccos6.
2, $"rPrTEM6nJT of DED�CATio� Onl—6D"r14 PtPTs Do NOT IhATcf/ Tf/t TTGE.
�. /✓GAS �f (G �� 6 rx r J- 4C — i S
JIz�WO( �1?z 16
Name (plea es print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
I*lat Site _Drainage Report —Other— go
City of Fort Collins
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape ��
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
City of Fort Collins
Department: Engineering
Date: September 23, 2005
Project: RIGDEN FARM, 6TH FILING, REPLAT OF LOTS M1 & M5
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
September 219 2005
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: General
Number: 1 S Created: 9/23/2005
[9123/05] The statements of dedication on both plats do not match the title.
Number: 19 Created: 9/23/2005
[9/23/05] Make sure that the correct project name is in all places where it is shown.
Number: 20 Created: 9/23/2005
(9/23/05] Coffee parkway was recently renamed William Neal Parkway — please change on
the plat documents.
Number: 21 Created: 9/23/2005
[9/23/05] Light and power needs utility easements provided along the lots lines to serve the
3 single family lots (#1).
Signature
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1