Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM SECOND LOTS 8 AND 9 2703 AND 2715 RIGDEN PARKWAY LA GRANGE HOMES - Filed MA-MINOR AMENDMENT - 2006-02-02&3 C rty of Fort Collins Zoning Department Comments Due By A _Minor Amendment tie i,ll,/� u?o°l 2SI N. C ollcgu Ave, PO Box 580 Planner Fort Collins, CO 80522 Effective Date 9�J3'o City of Port Collins N70 j 416-274'i I'AX (970) 224-6134 Minor Amendment Application Form Date Submitted: Project Name._�(�C`! [F+�4�-e _L<'v�ryccwv vt I vr� - n-� pp d Minor Amendment Fee: $192.00 Project Location (Street Address): /IA19' . Legal Description: �(��� ( ��f� 7�CC� �I� General Iatormabon: k isl't nl( pr'operto e �njrs having a legal, egt table i teres�in tht, proper(Attach separate sheets ifnet Cssar)). Owner'sName(s): ni'li-cC;� � n i , r E. -e4-e City/ tate'Zip: ff•''�" C.��'l�lY�nG � '���'1 `.''C�.Sa Street Address: Telephone:jC' Fax: T (�,',� ` i �l��.i�,i Name of firm: /'lGri%+'f`P`,1/i('�ly/'7lLUi�•l�a' Applicant's/Consultant's Name: - _ n K4'.�H �N City/State/Zip: 11% i In iL- Street Address: /� �) h- 1 Telephone. Fax: 7L7 �'7�. _=rp7 Email.• r�'11 df (j( SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1) Six (6) copies of RECORDED plan (i.e. site, landscape, elevation - whichever is being altered) in 24" x 36" size (available at the Technical Services Department at 281 N. College) — RED -LINE THE CHANGES ON FIVE (5) OF THE COPIES; 2) Completed and signed application form; and 3) Application fee of $192.00. MINOR AMENDMENT / Detailed description of the change and reason(s) for the request: ".1-Z Gci'k�1 CERTIFICATION certifv the 'information and exhibits submitted arc true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authorm of the owners of the propem(including all owners having a legal or equitable interest in the real property, as defined in section 1-2 of the City Codebj ', which is the suect of this application) without whose consent and authority the requested action should not lawfully bm e accomplished, pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the propery for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for posting a public notice on the property. Name (please PRINT). Cv✓ ���✓G/��� _ Addess i_�'J�-F�.Y,Gti=; ,t I,�hT C/'�(!'vt r�-- _. �yLy ✓7 JC Jr6�G� Signature Tclephouc:_.l �_.� — �� Approval Items for MA04075 Subdivision: RIGDEN FARM 2ND Site Address: 2703 RIGDEN PKWY Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) CURRENT PLANNING 07/19/2004 CMNT TWILLIAM 07/23/2004 OK Steve Olt ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 07/20/2004 OK Sheri Wamhoff POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY 07/21/2004 OK Peter Barnes approved with condition that fire wall separation is required between the two 4-plexes per Ron Gonzales. STORMWATER ENGINEERING 07/1512004 OK Basil Hamdan loining two buildings into one, no drainage issues. WWW - ENGINEERING 07/16/2004 OK RBUFFING ZONING 07/15/2004 CMNT Peter Barnes applicant hand carried copies to Engineering, Water, Stormwater, and PFA. 07/19/2004 OK Peter Barnes Page 1 of 1 07/23/2004 1:55,35 PM SUPPLEMENT to MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION Rigden Farm Second Filing 2703 & 2715 Rigden Parkway (Lots 8&9) Fort Collins, Colorado BACKGROUND: Rigden Farm Second Filing was approved in July, 2000. The project is commonly known as the LaGrange Condominiums and is marketed as "LaGrange Village Homes". It is a multi -family project planned for 97 total units. At this time thirty four units are complete or near completion. The project was designed with four different floor plan types (not counting minor variations and "reversed" units). The units are comprised in three distinctly different building types. Each building type has additional variations in the number of units in each building and the orientation of the units. One unique aspect of interest concerning the LaGrange project is the 21 one- story units that are designed and constructed as "Type B", handicapped adaptable. These units have been recently recognized as the only units in Fort Collins that are being built as "accessible friendly." There are many other aspects of the project that sets it apart from the norm, the project shall be a positive addition to the City of Fort Collins. By prior agreement between the City and the developers for the overall project, Rigden Farm, LLC.. the LaGrange site was required to have a higher density than typically required for LMN developments. To achieve a density of 11.2 DU/acre (while maintaining a townhouse style of unit), modifications were requested and approved for setbacks of various buildings. The modified setbacks essential iv allowed the porch structure to protrude into the setback by two feet and allowed a reduction of the setback to the porch of 9 feet and a setback to the actual building of 11 feet on the property directly south of the subject property (2575 DesMoines Drive/ Lot 12), An oversight in the approved setbacks did not request a reduction in the setback from streets for side yards —which is aiso required to be 15 feet. Although the reduced side yards were graphically shown, the reduction was not noted on the list approved by the Planning and Zoning Board. When the project was submitted and approved, the LMN district only allowed a maximum of six units per building in multi -family development. Once again, to meet density requirements, two four- plexes were shown for lots s and 9 with only a six foot separation between the two buildings. The existing street conf zuration dictated the frontage facing Rigden Parkway for these two lots. It would have been preferable to have planned for an eight-plex on a single lot. REQUESTS: Request 1: Be allowed to have an I 1 foot setback from Rigden Parkway to the porch and a 14'-6" setback to the buildings on Lots 3 and 9. Rationale: The existing building on Lot 12 directly to the south was approved for a smaller setback of 9 feet to the porch and I 1 feet to the building. The request for the setback to the building of 14 feet 6 inches is only 6 inches less than the requirement of 15 feet, and the reduced setback to the porch of I 1 feet allows for a larger porch and an enhanced entry feature. The amendment would be compatible with previously approved modifications. Request 2: Be allowed to join the two four-plex buildings together with a building separation wall (in conformance with the '97 Uniform building Code) at the property line, thus technically maintaining two four plex buildings but eliminating the six foot gap. Rationale: Current LMN permitted uses allow eight-plex buildings provided certain design standards are met. Although the two buildings would technically remain separate buildings with separate utility services, the appearance would be that of an eight-plex. As per the attached elevations, the design exceeds the requirements for variety and articulation in the roofs and facade. The roofs include. changes in plane and elevation, clerestories, and transitions to secondary roofs over the entry porches. The fapade is articulated with frequent recesses and projections on both the first floor and the second floor, there are distinctive, functional porches at each entrance, and there are contrasting materials including a corbelled brick base, 3" painted lapped siding, and 4" wood - stained lapped siding. Request 3: Be allowed to have side setbacks from DesMoines Drive and Limon Drive of 13 feet 3 inches rather than the required 15 feet. Rationale: Although reduced side setbacks from streets was not scheduled on the site plan, it was graphically shown and dimensioned to be a minimum of 9 feet six inches as shown on "Modification Request Drawing B" (see attached) which was one of the documents submitted with the modification request to P&Z. The setback that was shown on the approved site plan was 10 feet 3 inches, but by eliminating the 6 foot separation (Request 2, above) the setback has been increased by 3 feet on each side. The setback on 2575 DesMoines' Lot 12 directly to the south is 9 feet to the porch and 11 feet to the building. Consequently, Lots 3 and 9 shall be compatible with adjoining buildings and the approved modifications. SUMMARY: The requested amendments do not deviate from what was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board for other lots. The joining of two four-plexes together (into what shall appear to be an eight -plea) is now acceptable for LMN districts. The joining of the two buildings together shall meet all fire codes. 07/20/2004 10:07 9704933033 _ ADVOCATE / GLASER PAGE 02 . _r -\ 5. ' I FF= TF= 6,75 5.75 FG= 5,25 /F=25.50 7 O / 2. 9-2 TF=24.50 FG=24.00 / 3.tx .4 I, / I •U , .• . v 11p •1 • : r. ,, tr / O TF=23.50 3.4 FG=23.00 2' IDEWALK FF=26.00 COAPE-PAN CU BO PNG 61 TFL25.00 F-24.50 _ / I } 2' SIDEWALK ' CHASE, PAN k CURB OPNG� © All) F O 0 DES M DYNES DRIV - r 7 � rJ FF= 6.25 FF24.5O TF=25.75 FG= .75 ` TF FG�23.0O 23.50 � - r 07/20/2004 10:07 9704933033 ADVOCATE / GLASER PAGE 03 �\ 111e II 2.25 � \ 111c / I \ SF I/ 2� SIDEWALK CHASE, PAN ..... / \\ ' CURB OPNG 2 SIDEWALK / CURBS OPNG &--- 111d 1.64 V T►� I / II / II / II / II I 30 0 30 60 90 Feet \ ( IN FEET ) - 1 inch - 30 tt. I ! ^ I 1 1 DEVELOPED RUNOFF TABLE OWA393NJ pONT ■JUMM AREA YCOS) C 02 I (CFS) Cr$W (crs) MMmTw4^710N 4 104b, 104JR 1.23 0.71 1 2.3 12.2 EXISTING 15' TYPE R CURB INLET 5b 105b 0.90 0-85 1 2.1 9.0 TO STORM SEWER AND POND 218 Sc 105C 0.52 0.80 1.2 5.2 TO STORM SEWER AND POND 21 B 7d 107d 3.42 0.75 4.8 24.6 TO EXISTING TRIPLE COMBO INLET 7e 107e1, 107e2 2.32 0.78 4.7 42.8 TO EXISTING 15' TYPE R CURB INLET 110 1110 0.31 0.81 0.7 3.1 4' CURB OPNG & SIDEWALK CULVERT 1 1 b 1 1 t b 0.34 0.83 0.8 3.4 1 1 C 1 1 1 C 0.45 0,79 1.0 4.4 11f 1110-f 5.57 0,74 8-0 42.4 EXISTING 20' TYPE R CURB INLET 8.25' MIN dioo -0.92' ?%