Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSERRANO - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-12-22PROJECT AM CC►MME4,--NT SHEET City of Fort CoLins Current Plannint=_ DATE: October 27, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: 941-04 Serrano Townhomes, PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: J November 17, 2004 Note - PLEASE ideredlines or.future reference /, P✓rrun�oi3llY� GEvA� CcosE. 7-3eln C6/Y5Te-- \ 3 . ��v W� � Err r� �c-�-% /za T; o arc -CDs ->✓0 3� �H �D� r , aavi7v4'4c�< 2 oXS 7zG 1 � ----- Name (please print) CHECK [SERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS y r _-'lat Site Drainage Report Other_ ----- _Utility __Redline Utility _-andscaUC City of Fort Collins j1w► IZj?Srj1L.6 Sk-Y51-::Wt[. Coil Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: November 22, 2004 Project: SERRANO TOWNHOMES - PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN, #41-04 All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 17, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 11/16/2004 [11/161041 A utility coordination meeting is suggested to discuss the placement of utility lines and connections to the units. I can set this meeting up if desired. Number: 11 Created: 11/16/2004 [11/16/04] The plans specify privacy walls which fall within the typical 15' utility easement along Lemay. The utility companies should be aware and okay this proposal. Number: 12 Created: 11/16/2004 [11/16/041 It appears that the drainage along the private drive all falls towards Boardwalk and is directed across the sidewalk. The design needs to address this as the amount of drainage across the sidewalk is being exceeded (no more than 750 square feet of area behind the walk). Number: 15 Created: 11/16/2004 (11/16/04] The existing sidewalk along Boardwalk Drive was apparently constructed as part of a Safe Route to School project and was not contributed to by the land owner at the time. As such, with both the attached and detached portions of sidewalk not meeting LCUASS standards, the sidewalk along Boardwalk needs to be amended. The detached portion of existing sidewalk will need to be removed and replaced in accordance with sidewalk and parkway standards far a collector street 1,.5' detached sidewalk and 8' parkway). The existing attached sidewalk may not have to be removed, provided the sidewalk is widened by the same existing amount (F' and Transportation Planning agrees. Additional right-of-way or access easement may need to be dedicated to encompass the sidewalk placement. �I L f,1 Date zz CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _, Plat � Site _ Drainage Report Other_ _Utility Redlinc Utility ---tandscape Page l Number: 17 Created: 11/16/2004 [11/161041 The 20' private drive will need to be dedicated as an emergency access easement on the plat (Tract A). As PFA needs 20', the HOA will need to ensure that residents and visitors do not park along this private drive. Number: 21 Created: 11/16/2004 [11116/04] There appears to be not enough private drive width for the two spaces at the turn for the private drive. 22' of width is required in front of the parking spaces. Number: 22 Created: 11/16/2004 [11/16/041 The soils report mentions the use of perimeter drains around the foundations of the buildings. The construction plans will need to indicate how and where these perimeter drains will lead to. If they are tied into the storm drainage system, that's fine with Engineering (pending Stormwater approval) but groundwater cannot be directed onto a public street and/or across a sidewalk. Number: 37 Created: 11/19/2004 [11 /19/04] Comments made at staff review regarding an apparent lack of visitor and overflow parking have been removed for the time being. Please Clarify/revise the site and construction plan set to show that residents and visitors can utilize the driveway area in front of the garages for parking spaces and that these areas used as parking spaces will not interfere with the area PFA and emergency services need for emergency access. In addition, based on titre information provided at the staff review, please add notes on the site plan that coincide with the HOA information presented (residents are limited to two cars, residents are to parts; on driveways in front of the garage outside of the private drive aisles, no parking is allowed along the private drive, etc.) Number: 38 Created: 11/19/2004 [11/19/04] Technical Services has offered the following comments: 1. Boundary & legal close 2. Relabel the building envelope letters on the plat to be consistent with the site plan (which will be addressed as such). 3. Pen width to text ratio needs to be modified to show text more clearly. 4. Please show right-of-way width on Boardwalk Drive. 5. How was Lemay dedicated? Page 2 TA L PLAN MLag CQMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning; DATE: June 29, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #41-04A Serrano Townhomes PDP, Final Plans All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: I July 27, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference -❑' Vo Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 4.OoKz 6 u`9 1 ' --%/2� bs -- --------------- Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _ Utility Redline utility _Landscape 6a City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: August 1, 2005 Project: SERRANO TOWNHOMES - PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: July 27, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 22 Created: 11 /16/2004 [7/27/051 It is my understanding that it is the intention of the development to have the perimeter drain system tie into the storm drainage system. Please indicate this as a general note on the plans to help ensure that subsurface flows are not discharged onto the surface. [11 /16/041 The soils report mentions the use of perimeter drains around the foundations of the buildings- The construction plans will need to indicate how and where these perimeter drains will lead to. I` they are tied into the storm drainage system, that's fine with Engineering (pending Stormwater approval; but groundwater cannot be directed onto a public street and/or across a sidewalk. Number: 45 Created: 7/27/2005 [7/27/05] As the storm drain lines around the periphery of the site is considered private, please ensure that these lines are setback 15' from Lemay and 9' from Boardwalk right-of- way. Number: 46 Created: 7/27/2005 [7/27/051 The retaining wall/screen wall shown along Lemay on the grading plan needs tc be engineered by a structural engineer and meet City requirements as it potentially affects the sidewalk along Lemay. Please provide more information on the grading plan regarding the limits of where the :nail acts as a retaining wall. In addition, show more detail along the wall (additional Section B information along the wall). Signature Date �HECA' HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utilit-v T Landscape Page 1 Number: 47 Created: 7/27/2005 [7/27/051 Structural c:alcs will be required for submittal for the retaining wall along Lemay Avenue. Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 11 /16/2004 [7/27/05] The response letter from the developer dated 2-17-2005 indicated the following: "We agree that a utility coordination meeting will be a good idea for the project. We prefer to attend a utility coordination meeting after our Type I hearing." A utility coordination meeting is currently scheduled for Tuesday August 2nd at 1:30pm. [11/16/041 A utility coordination meeting is suggested to discuss the placement of utility lines and connections to the units. I can set this meeting up if desired. Number: 11 Created: 11 /16/2004 [7127/051 In general either provide information from the dry utilities that the walls located within utility easements behind the right-of-way is acceptable, or have these dry utilities also sign off on the construction plan set. The retaining wall along Lemay may be of particular concern. I'd suggest individual follow-up or a utility coordination meeting with the utilities to ensure there are no issues. [11116/041 The plans specify privacy walls which fall within the typical 15' utility easement along Lemay- The utility companies should be aware and okay this proposal. Number: 17 Created: 11 /16/2004 [7127/05] The emergency access easement was not provided on the plat. [11/16/041 The 20' private drive will need to be dedicated as an emergency access easement on the plat (Tract A). As PFA needs 20', the HOA will need to ensure that residents and visitors do not park along this private drive. Number: 43 Created: 7/27/2005 17/27/05] The sidewalk along Lemay is correctly scaled but incorrectly labeled as 5'. Please show the sidewalk on all plans as being 6' in width. Number: 44 Created: 7/27/2005 [7127/051 The Street Oversizing Manager in Engineering has agreed to reimburse the developer for any and all construction of sidewalk along Boardwalk Drive. With the existing sidewalk along Boardwalk being substandard, please remove the sidewalk and replace with 5' detached sidewalk and full reimbursement for the sidewalk will be made to the developer. Number: 48 Created: 7/27/2005 [7127/051 A slope easement will need to be dedicated along Lemay where the retaining wall is called for. The slope easement should be for 15' behind the Lemay Avenue right-of-way. Number: 52 Created: 7/29/2005 [7/29105] Does the proposal comply with 3.8.11 with regards to fences and walls regulations? Page 2 ,itvof ForCollins Current Planning FLYAL PAN REVISION COMMENT DATE: September 20, 2005 SHEET TO: Technical Services 0r� V PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt #41-04A Serrano Townhomes Final Plans Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: September 28, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems E'Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) " E �TL-E 17E�7�dATioN, Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat site __Drainage Report _Other_ Utility __Redline Utility _Landscape civof F�rtC . Project Comments Sheet � Selected Departments Citvof Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: September 30, 2005 Project: SERRANO TOWNHOMES - PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 28, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 46 Created: 7/27/2005 [9/23/051 The revised grading plan emailed on 9/23 as well as the grading plan submitted does not indicate proposed grading on the west side of the Lemay Avenue retaining wall. The construction plan needs to include a design for how the retaining wall is to be built. Please provide a note indicating that the wall is to be a consistent 6' in height along the street side of Lemay for clarification. [7/27/05] The retaining wall/screen wall shown along Lemay on the grading plan needs to be engineered by a structural engineer and meet City requirements as it potentially affects the sidewalk along Lemay. Please provide more information on the grading plan regarding the limits of where the wall acts as a retaining wall. In addition; show more detail along the wall (additional Section B information along the wall). Number: 47 Created: 7/27/2005 [9/23/05] Carried over as unresolved. [7/27/051 Structural talcs will be required for submittal for the retaining wall along Lemay Avenue. Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 11/16/2004 [9/27105] Please move the Light and Power signature line from the Utility Providers block to the City Signature Block and add Comcast and Qwest to the Utility Providers block. These outside utility provides (Comcast. Qwest. Xcel) will need to sign mylars before City signatures. /3,;/ 5 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 'T- Plat _ Site Drainage Report Other_ _ Utility _ Redline Litility Landscape Page I Page 2 [7127105] In general, either provide information from the dry utilities that the walls located within utility easements behind the right-of-way is acceptable, or have these dry utilities also sign off on the construction plan set. The retaining wall along Lemay may be of particular concern. I'd suggest individual follow-up or a utility coordination meeting with the utilities to ensure there are no issues. [11/16/04] The plans specify privacy walls which fall within the typical 15' utility easement along Lemay. The utility companies should be aware and okay this proposal. Number: 69 Created: 9/27/2005 [9/27/051 Coordinate the title of the project to be consistent between all plan sets. The plat is titled "Serrano Townhome" (remove PDP), the site and landscape plans are titled "Serrano" and the construction plan is titled "Serrano Townhomes". Topic: Plat Number: 68 Created: 9/27/2005 [9/27/051 Remove "PDP" from the name of the plat. Topic: Utility plans Number: 75 Created: 9/30/2005 [9/30/051 Please add LCUASS Drawing 1601 to the details sheet. Page 2