The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBLOCK 173 300 SMITH STREET OLD TOWN COMMONS - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-12-22PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: October 13, 2004 TO: Technical Services REL . D PROJECT: 937-04 300 Smith Street, Old Town Commons PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Anne Aspen no later than the staff review meeting: i November 3, 2004 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference 77, 3 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Drainage Report _Other_ —Utility Redline Utility __Landscape .� PROJECT i.AA COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Coll iris Current PlanninL REi.'D DATE: October 13, 2004 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #37-04 300 Smith Street, Old Town Commons PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Anne Aspen no later than the staff review meeting: November 3, 2004 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference e5,17,fv K Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS __ Ylat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _- --Utility Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet CAN, of Fort Cotlins Selected Departments -- Department: Engineering Date: November 5, 2004 Project: 300 SMITH STREET, OLD TOWN COMMONS PDP - TYPE 11 Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 12 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] Please ensure all documents are in 24x36 format. Number: 13 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] The alley needs to be constructed in concrete from the street to the projection of the front property 'line for the project. Number: 16 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/041 Provide a concrete ribbon on the east side of the alley in accordance with the LCLASS. Number: 17 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/041 Expand the patching limits shown along Olive Street to 6' in width (half a lane) and add the following note referencing these patches: "Limits of street repair are approximate. Final limits to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector at the time the cuts are made." Number: 18 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] Add a note with regards to the existing sidewalk along Smith Street that all substandard sidewalk along Smith Street adjacent to the property frontage shall be replaced by determination of the City Engineering Inspector. Number: 19 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] The sidewalk along Olive Street needs to continue across the alley with access ramps on both sides of the alley. Number: 20 Created: 10/29/2004 (10/29/04] More information is needed with regards to the existing surrounding area and what impact the development may cause. Provide additional contours and existing spot elevations. Will the alley construction result in the need for offsite easements? Number: 21 Created: 10/29/2004 /i Z5 f Da e CHECK; HERK-IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat ,/ Site Drainage Report Other_ _Utility Redline Utility ,''Landscape Page I [10/29/041 Additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated along the alley to the back of (driveover) curb. In addition, 8' of utility easement from behind the right-of-way is also required. Where does the alley right-of-way end on the ease side of the alley? Number: 22 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] The alley design notes a 6' concrete pan instead of the driveover curb and gutter required with Alley Option (B) in the LCUASS. Number: 23 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] There appears to be some discrepancy with regards to the sidewalk connection from Smith Street to the property. The landscape plan and utility plan appear to show this existing sidewalk to remain while the site plan apparently shows it to be removed and replaced. If it is proposed to remain, it appears to be substandard for ADA with regards to width and the lack of an access ramp connecting to Smith Street. Number: 24 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] The site plan shows sidewalk connection out to Olive Street which are not shown on the utility plan, please coordinate between the drawings. Number: 25 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] Site plan, utility plan, and building elevation sets specify information (such as finish floor elevations) that do not match each other. Number: 26 Created: 10/29/2004 [10129/04] The window wells along the south side of the building fall within the swale area, is this a good idea considering flows being directed along the swale? I'd like to see a typical cross section of the swale and window well situation. Number: 27 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] Information will need to be provided indicating how a potential perimeter drain system (as recommended by the soils report) around the foundation(s) will discharge. Indicate on the construction plan set where the sump pump pit (or pits) are to be located or where a pipe (or pipes) are to daylight. Flows are not allowed to cross a sidewalk as well as enter a public street. Number: 28 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/04] In general, provide standard title blocks, approval blocks (as appropriate), and other required information on all drawing documents. Number: 29 Created: 10/29/2004 [10/29/041 The soils report appears to recommend 10% slopes around the foundation(s) which doesn't appear to be accommodated into the design, though if 10% slopes are to be designed, could there be a concern with how such a design would tie into existing grades to the south? Number: 41 Created: 11/3/2004 [11/3/041 A utility coordination meeting is suggested to discuss utility servicing to the site. I will send out an ernail to the utilities in order to begin this. Page 2 Rr', VISION COMMENT SHEET t' of Fort Collins rrent Planning DATE: January 5, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #39-03A 300 Smith Street PDP All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: January 19, 2005V Note - Please identify vour redlines for future reference n Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Citv of Fort Col" Ills Department: Engineering Date: January 21, 2005 Project: 300 SMITH STREET, OLD TOWN COMMONS PDP - TYPE II All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 19, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 19 Created: 10/29/2004 [1/18/05] Please ensure LCUASS detail 803 is provided to ensure compliance with the comment. [10/29/04] The sidewalk along Olive Street needs to continue across the alley with access ramps on both sides of the alley. Number: 20 Created: 10/29/2004 [1 /18/05] With the silt fence shown outside of the property line it appears that a construction easement will be needed to the south with the adjacent property owner. Also, being able to grade with equipment such that a landscape wall can be constructed directly adjacent to the property line, appears to only be possible by getting construction easement permission from the adjacent property owner. [10/29/04] More information is needed with regards to the existing surrounding area and what impact the development may cause. Provide additional contours and existing spot elevations. Will the alley construction result in the need for offsite easements? Number: 21 Created: 10/29/2004 [1118/05] With only 4' of utility easement being proposed, a variance request is required from the Engineering which will be routed to the various utilities in order to verify their approval. [10/29/04] Additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated along the alley to the back of (driveover) curb. In addition, 8' of utility easement from behind the right-of-way is also required. Where does the alley right -of -way -end on the ease side of the alley? Z! es— te CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat ---Site Drainage Report Other �ZJtility _ Redline Utility ✓Landscape Page I Number: 23 Created: 10/29/2004 (1/18/05] Note on the construction plans (existing conditions) that the existing sidewalk connection from the existing house out to Smith Street is to be removed, which coincides with the site plan. [10/29/041 There appears to be some discrepancy with regards to the sidewalk connection from Smith Street to the property. The landscape plan and utility plan appear to show this existing sidewalk to remain while the site plan apparently shows it to be removed and replaced. If it is proposed to remain, it appears to be substandard for ADA with regards to width and the lack of an access ramp connecting to Smith Street. Number: 25 Created: 10/29/2004 [1/18/05] This still is apparently an issue, the site plan specifies foundation elevations that do not match the utility plans. [10/29/04] Site plan, utillity plan, and building elevation sets specify information (such as finish floor elevations) that do not match each other. Number: 55 Created: 1/18/2005 [1/18/051 Is it the case that the drainage collected from the inlet on the west side of the alley cannot be directed underneath the sidewalk to the west out to Olive Street instead of the grate system? This would reduce costs as well as general concerns on the amount of concrete pavement beneath the grate system to ensure it holds up to traffic. Page .- �• '.,. vf..,.4�,1i.$mi:]��iLs,vb:.[rti:._..4�s.8.uL,£�dSiS`:'4�.aru�. Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Port Collins Department: Engineering Date: April 20, 2005 Project: 300 SMITH STREET, OLD TOWN COMMONS PDP AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: April 20, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 55 Created: 1/18/2005 [4/19/05] The redesign has concerns. Only .2% of grade is being provided, there's not enough slope to ensure adequate drainage. In talking with Stormwater, couldn't the design function better if the grate in the alley was eliminated and a chase was designed from the alley out to the sidewalk by having the invert elevation at the alley start at 66.42 to daylight to the street at 66.21? Rather than a grate on the sidewalk, use a metal plate (see attached detail). 11/18/051 Is it the ease that the drainage collected from the inlet on the west side of the alley cannot be directed underneath the sidewalk to the west out to Olive Street instead of the grate system? This would reduce costs as well as general concerns on the amount of concrete pavement beneath the grate system to ensure it holds up to traffic. c-U y— Date HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility, Redline Utility Landscape Page I