The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFARMSTEAD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-10-28PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: Febmary 25, 2003 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #8-03 THE FARMSTEAD PDP - TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: March 19, 2003 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference l4e"14, '5�c2l� '1506/� * he 'e'- K Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS #MR _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins [Original Comment] The street design for Pennsylvania Street is lacking. Flowline profiles are required for review. Show inlet locations and utility crossings in the profile views. °rovide line/curve table on flowlines. Provide additional spot elevations on the plan view at points around curves. Ou-ite design for Pennsylvania Street needs to be continued for 500 feet beyond the proposed construction. The aesign itself for Pennsylvania Street needs to show a fully constructed street within the development (curb and gutter, sidewalk) in the ultimate condition, as well as the "current" condition with a temporary turnaround. Number: 58 Created: 3/26/2003 [ 10/ 14/03] This comment is required to be resolved until after hearing, however please note that the plans in their current form do not reflect meeting these requirements. [Original Comment] The box culvert needs to meet requirements set forth in LCUASS Chapter 11, three -sided structures are noted specifically in 11.5.7. The live load for the box culvert requires HS-25 loading and the design life of the structure is required to be 100 years. Number: 59 Created: 3/26/2003 [ 10/ 14/03] This comment was not addressed, however it is not required until a final plan submittal after public hearing. [Original Commentj Indicate on the grading plan high points and low points for spot elevations. Number: 60 Created: 3/26/2003 [ 10/ 14/03] Please ensure text shown on Sheet 3 is enlarged to be more readable. [Original Comment] Plan set has unreadable/unscannable text that needs to be adjusted. Number: 76 Created: 3/28/2003 110/14/03] Engineering has since removed the requirement for truncated domes, thus this is no longer a requirement ar.'. the truncated dome detail can be removed. Please ensure that the previously mentioned drawing detail below is enclosed as a detail in the detail sheet with the final plan. [Original Comment] Please use directional ramps for the sidewalk system at the Laporte/Pennsylvania intersection (LCUASS SD-1606) with the enclosed detail for the truncated domes. Page 4 REVISION REM COMMENT SHEET DATE: April 14, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #8-03 The Farmstead PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: April 28, 2004 NUJ ElNo Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** /,13o't/NDA-10Y #LEGA-L. If Z. /V EEvs To /Nc i [l DE `�C! TYo 1't�K% L�JLLin/ 5 3 —54C /cUo / /29c7s Sfl�v�v � Lo7S� O�z SNuci /�Ui�O"�/ E/tl(lCL%Et f%n 0 /H6 (Ji 46� of Tlk 7)21krs GCd'V It.� ! I140Cr0 $c CtsT�� it llur Lc7 s . i� TI I /�%� Nlt 2cc /� on'.aL sNeL/"j l3E �c0/cATc� -41 L ITHLIL A l?wj c,z EA. E-PleN r o/ Name (please print) Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS X Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _ 6a Utility _RedlineUtility _Landscape C+rooeFartcou�as Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Cily of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: May 3, 2004 Project: THE FARMSTEAD PDP-TYPE 1 (LUC) #8-03 All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: April 28, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 72 Created: 3/27/2003 [4/27/041 Comment is carried over for reference. [10/141031 The applicant has indicated it is the intention of Lot 1 to use this access off Taft Hill for driveway access which doubles as emergency access for PFA. Engineering is not concerned with this, provided that the physical obstruction (approved by PFA) to denote this as emergency access only is initially placed behind the right-of-way along Taft Hill and only relocated as shown on the plans at such time that the lot is developed into a residence. There will need to be restrictions placed in the development agreement with regards to fencing off the emergency access area, not parking cars within it, maintenance, etc. The pavement design report for the project will have to recommend a concrete sidewalk thickness which will handle the loading of emergency services vehicles using the site. [Original Comment] What is the development plan for Lot 1? Will future vehicular access to the lot take place from Taft Hill via the emergency access? Intentions regarding direct vehicular access from this lot to Taft Hill need to be understood. Number: 154 Created: 4/28/2004 [4128/04] The developer should look at having the water line connection as well as the new driveway approach out to Taft Hill constructed in advance of the City's in -place street work on Taft Hill in order to avoid cutting into a newly redone street. The developer would need to fill out an excavation permit through Engineering in order to accomplish this. The developer will need to have City licensed concrete, utility and asphalt contractors to do this work. Contact Rick Richter (221-6605) in order to coordinate. Number: 155 Created: 4/28/2004 [4/28/04] The plans will need to be modified at a later date to reflect the installation of the water line and driveway cut as existing referenced in the previous comment. Number: 162 Created: 4/30/2004 [4/301041 The existing driveway out to Taft Hill should be removed with the work done referenced in Comment #154 unless the ditch company needs this access point. CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH Plat ite Utility _ ✓ ►Redline Utility .- 3 Date' TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Drainage Report Other ✓Candscape Page I Number: 169 Created: 4/30/2004 14/30/041 Coordinate discrepancies between the utility plans and planning documents (the storm chase design is different, the street width labelling is different, etc.) Topic: Plat Number: 145 Created: 4/27/2004 [4/27/04] The plat appears to have fundamental issues regarding the ability to build the proposed units. With the note regarding Tracts A and B are to be owned and maintained by the association, it appears no building of units can occur within these tracts as there is no exemption within these tracts for building envelopes. Either building envelopes or individual lots should be created for the buildings within these tracts. Number: 146 Created: 4/27/2004 [41271041 There should be an indication on the plat what Tracts A and B are designated as (easements?, open space?, etc.) Number: 147 Created: 4/27/2004 [4/27/041 Technical Services has offered the following comments: 1. Boundary & legal close. 2. Legal needs to include "City of Fort Collins". 3. The two tracts should be lots, or show building envelopes, and the usage of the tracts and ownership should be listed if not lots. 4. The New Mecer Canal should be dedicated as either a right-of-way or easement on this plat. Topic: Site Plan Number: 40 Created: 3/25/2003 [4/271041 This doesn't appear to be addressed. [10/14/03] The site plan states this is also for residential lot access. This should be amended to indicate it is for residential bicycle and pedestrian lot access. [Original Comment] If the pathway connection out to Taft Hill is required for emergency services, an emergency access easement designation is needed on the plat in addition to the access easement designation. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 52 Created: 3/26/2003 [4/27/041 Left as unresolved for future reference. 110/141031 This comment was not addressed but is not required to be addressed until after a hearing per our new review criteria. [Orignal Comment] On the cover sheet add the affirmation statement, typical street cross sections, Developer/Owner/Consultant names -address -phone, two benchmarks, per LCLIASS. Number: 57 Created: 3/26/2003 [4/27/04] Left as unresolved for reference. At the time of submittal after hearing, please label the percent grades along the flowlines to help in review. [10/14/03] This comment is left as unresolved as flowline profiles and utility crossings were not shown. However, because of the new submittal requirements as a consequence of the "Zucker Report", the information provided is sufficient to constitute sufficiency under this process. This comment will need to be addressed after a public hearing for the project. [Original Comment] The street design for Pennsylvania Street is lacking. Flowline profiles are required for review. Show inlet locations and utility crossings in the profile views. Provide line/curve table on flowlines. Provide additional spot elevations on the plan view at points around curves. Offsite design for Pennsylvania Street needs to be continued for 500 feet beyond the proposed construction. The design itself for Pennsylvania Street needs to show a fully Page 2 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins 0 Department: Engineering Date: July 12, 2004 Project: THE FARMSTEAD PDP-TYPE 1 (LUC) #8-03 All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 30, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Box Culvert Design Number: 177 Created: 6/18/2004 [6/18/041 Prior to sign off on mylars for the project, provide signed and stamped structural calculations by a structural engineer on the box culvert design. Topic: General Number: 154 Created: 4/28/2004 [6/18/04] Carried over for reference. [4/28104] The developer should look at having the water line connection as well as the new driveway approach out to Taft Hill constructed in advance of the City's in -place street work on Taft Hill in order to avoid cutting into a newly redone street. The developer would need to fill out an excavation permit through Engineering in order to accomplish this. The developer will need to have City licensed concrete, utility and asphalt contractors to do this work. Contact Rick Richter (221-6605) in order to coordinate. Number: 155 Created: 4/28/2004 [7/9/04] Carried over for reference. [4/28/041 The plans will need to be modified at a later date to reflect the installation of the water line and driveway cut as existing referenced in the previous comment. Number: 162 Created: 4/30/2004 [6/18/041 The plans do not indicate the driveway is to be removed; the consultant engineer had indicated in a meeting that the ditch company does not need this access point and that it can be removed. Signature % i2oi Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Platte Site Drainage Report Other_ ✓ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 [4/301041 The existing driveway out to Taft Hill should be removed with the work done referenced in Comment #154 unless the ditch company needs this access point. Topic: Plat Number: 192 Created: 7/12/2004 [7/12/041 The plat language (including guarantees and the notice of other documents) is outdated and actually a little more restrictive. I'd suggest amending it to the language attached, which can be electronically emailed if desired. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 178 Created: 6/18/2004 [6/18/041 The street profile sheet should show the box culvert on the profile view of both flowlines as well as the cross pan and sanitary sewer main that crosses the street into the private drive. Number: 193 Created: 7/12/2004 [7/12/04] On Sheet: 11, indicate the scale for the blow-up of the street (1"=10'). Number: 194 Created: 7/12/2004 [7/12/041 Add detain figure 11-8 in LCUASS to the box culvert detail sheet. Number: 195 Created: 7/12/2004 [7/12/041 Ensure theType III barricade detail is provided, it doesn't appear to be on the plan set. Number: 196 Created: 7/12/2004 [7/12/041 The truncated dome detail is nearing completion but not yet available. If there is a timing issue, sketched drawings are available that would need to be converted to CAD and placed on the plan set. Page 2 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: September 28, 2004 Project: THE FARMSTEAD PDP-TYPE 1 (LUC) #8-03 All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: Issue Contact: Marc Virata There are questions regarding the three sided box design: • With the structure now being shown as a radial "curved" structure instead of two straight sections angled together, there doesn't seem to be any indication as to how this is to be built based on the details shown on Sheet 12. • How is the bottom of the box attached to the concrete foundation (keyed, dowelled, etc.)? • The concrete foundation and base material information is needed to be shown on the plan set so that City Inspection is aware of the proposal and should be designed by a structural engineer. • There doesn't appear to be any information regarding the wingwalls (angles, lengths, elevations as top and bottom of the walls, how they are anchored to the pre -cast structure, etc.) Please provide additional information (see Note #3 on the wingwall detail per Sheet 13) • In general, more detailed grading is needed (and could be included in the plan view of the culvert on Sheet 13) r Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ r Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 PROJECT i.� COMMENT SHEET Citv of Fort Callins Current Planninie DATE: February 25, 2003 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #8-03 THE FARMSTEAD PDP - TYPE I (LUC) Sw c°R TAF'T 4-LAF0FTE All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: M \J . March 19, 2003 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference Z. Lc6oac -Po nl oT n 14 rCH. 3• B�a�ya Ewve,jor4 G4 y Nol" �c loom�d. — Size oT L-41y. �• mew Mc tee t Ga ha dah no T %C 2s li In a oa$QN1e„{ nveded 4r buoy )00 s tq,S aS Stiow h on iNe 51 I� P laL1: .7. s,k P�a� stio..JS }juird��, f ou+s,d� b e- tjfelo�. g, A*e e_asew�e�ts' tn�c�� 4�oHc� -tie u9cs+ q�t� Sou�j l Hs I (2/IGTS1 Gtlf-FO LLUn! �A/NTA-/NJ�C�/D! ,v Name (please print) !O • i Tc f/ CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS +- Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins (,win Project Comments Sheet ii�'�l■ Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: March 28, 2003 Project: THE FARMSTEAD PDP-TYPE 1 (LUC) #8-03 All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: March 19, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 17 Created: 3/21/2003 A letter of Intent from the Ditch Company agreeing in principle to the proposed development is required prior to any future scheduling of a hearing. Provide Ditch Company signature blocks on the construction drawings. Number: 38 Created: 3/25/2003 A temporary turnaround Is required to terminate public right-of-way in accordance with L.U.C. 3.6.2(C). Provide and accommodate into the design of the site, a temporary turnaround (can be done off -site with easements). Depending on the layout of the temporary turnaround design, there may be concerns with how the site will function with the temporary turnaround In place (drainage, sidewalk connectivity, driveway approaches, etc.) Number: 39 Created: 3/25/2003 An interim/ultimate design is needed for Pennsylvania Street. The development needs to show how the layout would work with the continuation of the Pennsylvania Street through to the south (parking spaces would be lost, the sidewalk needs to be continued to the property line, etc). Number: 41 Created: 3/25/2003 There is no sidewalk adjacent to Building 4 (and 5) along the public street, nor are there connecting walkways to tie into this missing sidewalk. Number: 42 Created: 3/25/2003 It is suggested (not required) that the project name be changed from "The Farmstead" to "Farmstead" for the purposes of document tracking. Hopefully with all the agencies that may keep records on the project, only in the City's DMS will the project be filed under "T". Number: 43 Created: 3/25/2003 The width of Pennsylvania Street across the ditch is too narrow. The street needs to be 24' in width, minimum. Number: 54 Created: 3/26/2003 Where the street narrows, angle points should be removed and replaced with curves (I S' radii minimum). Signature Date CHECK :HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number: 68 Created: 3/27/2003 The public sidewalk in right-of-way needs to tie into existing sidewalks past the property, as well as tie into the existing Laporte/Taft Hill intersection. Number: 69 Created: 3/27/2003 Unless viewed otherwise by Traffic Engineering, an alternative analysis is required in the traffic study on the suitability of a roundabout at the Taft Hill/Laporte intersection. Number: 71 Created: 3/27/2003 Are basements planned for in the development? If so, how would a perimeter drain system function, especially in areas of close proximity to the ditch? Number: 72 Created: 3/27/2003 What is the development plan for Lot I? Will future vehicular access to the lot take place from Taft Hill via the emergency access? Intentions regarding direct vehicular access from this lot to Taft Hill need to be understood. Number: 77 Created: 3/28/2003 A utility coordination meeting is suggested to discuss utility design servicing the site. Topic: Plat Number: 36 Created: 3/25/2003 The right-of-way on Taft Hill and Laporte adjacent to this site should have already been dedicated. Please provide the reception number(s) on the plat indicating this dedication. It appears that the dimensions shown do not fully correspond with the dedications. Number: 40 Created: 3/25/2003 If the pathway connection out to Taft HIII is required for emergency services, an emergency access easement designation is needed on the plat in addition to the access easement designation. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 1 Created: 2/25/2003 Per the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) 1011 /2002, a completed checklist as shown in Appendix E is required to be submitted. Please complete this checklist for the next review. in general, there are issues with the information presented in the construction drawing set that would be satisfied by following the checklist. Additional comments may occur as a result of the additional information needing to be provided. Number: 16 Created: 3/21/2003 The 4' and 2' wide concrete chases may be potential safety issues with people walking/traveling across them, why can't these be piped? Number: 37 Created: 3/25/2003 Please show on the drawings the proposed structure to be built by the City on Taft Hill Road in order to ascertain how proposed site improvement correlate with the structure. The sidewalk shown on Taft Hill may not coincide with the sidewalk across the structure. Number: 52 Created: 3/26/2003 On the cover sheet add the affirmation statement, typical street cross sections, Developer/Owner/Consultant names - address -phone, two benchmarks, per LCUASS. Number: 53 Created: 3/26/2003 Add a copy of the plat as reference to the utility plans. Number: 55 Created: 3/26/2003 A concrete sidewalk culvert is required where drainage leaves right-of-way at spot elevation (59.08). Page 2 Number: 56 Created: 3/26/2003 Provide spot elevations in accordance to LCUASS standard details (7-27) of street to street intersections. This Is for the Laporte/Pennsylvania intersection as well as the mid block cross pan south of the bridge. Per the detail, Include showing the transition point and the elevation at that transition point to remove the crown from the street. Number: 57 Created: 3/26/2003 The street design for Pennsylvania Street is lacking. Flowline profiles are required for review. Show inlet locations and utility crossings in the profile views. Provide line/curve table on Flowlines. Provide additional spot elevations on the plan view at points around curves. Offsite design for Pennsylvania Street needs to be continued for 500 feet beyond the proposed construction. The design itself for Pennsylvania Street needs to show a fully constructed street within t.ie development (curb and gutter, sidewalk) In the ultimate condition, as well as the "current" condition with a temporary turnaround. Number: 58 Created:. 3/26/2003 The box culvert needs to meet requirements set forth in LCUASS Chapter 11, three -sided structures are noted specifically In 11.5.7. The live load for the box culvert requires HS-25 loading and the design life of the structure is required to be 100 years. Number: 59 Created: 3/26/2003 Indicate on the grading plain high points and low points for spot elevations. Number: 60 Created: 3/26/2003 Plan set has unreadable/unscannable text that needs to be adjusted. Number: 76 Created: 3/28/2003 Please use directional ramps for the sidewalk system at the Laporte/Pennsylvania Intersection (LCUASS SD-1606) with the enclosed detail for the truncated domes. Number: 79 Created: 3/28/2003 Driveway approaches are required to be concrete. The use of radius style driveways onto Pennsylvania Street is not allowed and need to be shown per LCUASS SD-706. Number: 88 Created: 3/28/2003 Ensure that all details referenced herein are Included In the utility plan details sheet. Number: 90 Created: 3/28/2003 Please provide additional labeling of contours (proposed and existing) on the grading plan in order to better follow drainage patterns. Offsite easements may be required for drainage and/or construction. Page 3 IRLVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 26, 200 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #8-03 THE FARMSTEAD PDP - TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: October 15, 2003 No Comment RProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** 7` Tr2-,T ,4N m r�� a �� c r� � ` �,- ] Z SlC C A' CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ate Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sleet City of PortCotM Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: October 22, 2003 Project: TIHE FARMSTEAD PDP-TYPE 1 (LUC) #8-03 All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: October 15, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 38 Created: 3/25/2003 [ 10/ 14/031 The applicant has elected to dedicate a temporary turnaround on the plat but not agree to construct said turnaround. The response indicates that PFA does not require the turnaround and that dedicating (but not constructing) meets the provision of 3.6.2(C). While PFA does not require the turnaround, Engineering still requires it. The applicant may be able to prove that the intent is met by 3.6.2(C), however, not constructing said turnaround is also not compliant with LCUASS 7.6.4.C. The applicant would require the approval of a variance request to not meet this standard, it is not likely the City Engineer would support such a variance. [Original Comment] A temporary turnaround is required to terminate public right-of-way in accordance with L.U.C. 3.6.2(C). Provide and accommodate into the design of the site, a temporary turnaround (can be done off -site with easements). Depending on the layout of the temporary turnaround design, there may be concerns with how the site will function with the temporary turnaround in place (drainage, sidewalk connectivity, driveway approaches, etc.) Number: 39 Created: 3/25/2003 110114/03] This comment is left as unresolved but does not need to be addressed until after a hearing under our submittal guidelines. With the parking spaces now eliminated and the sidewalk extending to the property line, th, as great of an issue, the only concern would be to demonstrate that the temporary turnaround condition and through conditions are both constructable and work for both the site and the surrounding properties. [Original Comment] An interim/ultimate design is needed for Pennsylvania Street. The development needs to show how the layout would work with the continuation of the Pennsylvania Street through to the south (parking spaces would be lost, the sidewalk needs to be continued to the property line, etc). Number: 42 Created: 3/25/2003 [ 10/ 14/031 The change of the title on the site ai landscape plans are appreciated. This change wasn't made on the utility plans and building elevations and would further be appreciated. Signature iiiii 7 C Dat 9HECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _/'plat _ Site Drainage Report Other_ ✓ Utility _ /f2edlinc Utility Landscape Page l [Original Comment] It is suggested (not required) that the project name be changed from "The Farmstead" to "Farmstead" for the purposes of document tracking. Hopefully with all the agencies that may keep records on the project, only in the City's DMS will the project oe Fled under "T". Number: 68 Created: 3/27/2003 [ I ('114/031 This was addressed for the sidewalk on Laporte heading west, but not on Taft Hill for the sidewalk heading south. After further discussion internal to Engineering, it was discussed that it may be more appropriate if the sidewalk along Taft Hill was not constructed at this tme and the developer provide for funds in lieu of constructing instead. [Original Comment] The public sidewalk in right-of-way needs to tie into existing sidewalks past the property, as well as tie into the existing Laporte/Taft Hill intersection. Number: 72 Created: 3/27/2003 [ 10/ 14/031 The applicant has indicated it is the intention of Lot I to use this access off Taft Hill for driveway access which doubles as emergency access for PFA. Engineering is not concerned with this, provided that the physical obstruc,ica (approved by PFA) to denote this as emergency access only is initially placed behind the right-of-way along Taft Hill and only relocated as shown on the plans at such time that the lot is developed into a residence. There will need to be reuictions placed in the development agreement with � egards to fencing off the emergency access area, not parking cars within it, maintenance, etc. The pavement design report for the project will have to recommend a concrete sidewalk thickness which will handle the loading of emergency services vehicies using the site. [Original Comment] What is the development plan for Lot 1? Will future vehicular access to the lot take place from Hill via the emergency access? Intentions regarding direct vehicular access from this lot to Taft Hill need to be under ,: L J. Number: 77 Created: 3/28/2003 [ 10/14/031 A meeting can be scheduled by Engineering in response to the applicant's response. Would such a meeting be appropriate now or more appropriate in conjunction with a final plan after hearing? [Original Comment] A utility coordination meeting is suggested to discuss utility design servicing the site. Number: 115 Created: 10/14/2003 The checklist submitted by the engineer indicates variance requests for minimum tangents between curves and at intersections for Pennsylvania Street. Were these intended to be submitted? The variance requests are required as a prerequisite to a public hearing. The variance requests need to justify why the standards cannot/were not met and ho-- proposed design is not a compromise to the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. Note that if a covereo _ is an option the Developer wishes to pursue, this may have an impact on sight distance, which in turn might have an impact on how these variance requests would be evaluated by the City. Number: 116 Created: 10/14/2003 Laporte Avenue is required to be constructed with 6' sidewalk width, not 4' as shown. This is also the case with Taft Hill Road, although it may be more appropriate if sidewalk construction was deferred until a later date. Number. 141 Created: 10/21 /2003 [ 10/21 /03] The design of the carport attached to the house on the southeast corner of Penn and Laporte does not have a driveway attached to it. If the intention is to widen the proposed driveway out to Penn to include the carport then a maximum of 24' must be adhered to. Also, any additional widening should not affect the sidewalk system. Number: 142 Created: 10/21/2003 [ 10/21 /031 Prior to a hearing, the project will need to address the horizontal alignment variances for Pennsylvania Avenue (required from the design engineer). In addition, the temporary turnaround hoizontal design is required to be accommodated into the development and still meet parking requirements. Number: 144 Page 2 Created: 10/22/2003 [10/22/031 The access ramp on the southwest corner of Taft Hill and Laporte will be replaced with "directional ramps" (LCUAS Drawing 1606) as part of the City bridge work. The proposed sidewalk along Laporte will need to tie into this as reclined. Topic: Plat Number: 40 Created: 3/25/2003 [IO/14/031 The site plan states this is also for residential lot access. This should be amended to indicate it is for residential bicycle and pedestrian lot access. [Original Comment] If the pathway connection out to Taft Hill is required for emergency services, an emergency access easement designation is needed on the plat in addition to the access easement designation. Number: 118 Created: 10/15/2003 The ditch company needs to be a signatory to the plat. Number. 143 Created: 10/22/2003 [10/22/031 Technical Services presented the following comments: 1. Legal and Plat do not match. Legal closes. Plat is missing a call. 2. Vicinity Map missing. 3. What is Tract A? Who owns and maintains both tracts? 4. Ditch company needs to sign the plat. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 52 Created: 3/26/2003 [ 10/14/031 This comment was not addressed but is not required to be addressed until after a hearing per our new review criteria. [Orignal Comment] On the cover sheet add the affirmation statement, typical street cross sections, Developer/Owner/Consultant names -address -phone, two benchmarks, per LCUASS. Number: 55 Created: 3/26/2003 [ 10/ 14/031 The utility plans still specify this as a metal culvert, concrete is required. Please see the attached drawing which should be used as the detail for the culvert. [Original Comment] A concrete sidewalk culvert is required where drainage leaves right-of-way at spot elevation (59.08). Number: 56 Created: 3/26/2003 [ 10/ 14/031 This was provided in both cases with the exception of the transition points on either side of the cross pan. This is no longer required prior to hearing. Please note that the spot elevations will not be reviewed now and will be reviewed with a final submittal in conjunction with a final submittal that includes flowline profiles. [Orignal Comment] Provide spot elevations in accordance to LCUASS standard details (7-27) of street to street intersections. This is for the Laporte/Pennsylvania intersection as well as the mid block cross pan south of the bridge. Per the detail, include showing the transition point and the elevation at that transition point to remove the crown from the street. Number: 57 Created: 3/26/2003 [10/14/031 This comment is left as unresolved as flowline profiles and utility crossings were not shown. However, because of the new submittal requirements as a consequence of the "Zucker Report", the information provided is sufficient to constitute sufficiency under this process. This comment will need to be addressed after a public hearing for the project. Page 3