Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM EIGHTH THE SHOPS AT RIGDEN FARM 2602 SOUTH TIMBERLINE KING SOOPERS FUELING - Filed MA-MINOR AMENDMENT - 2005-10-04•� I1HR 2J ZfVt Ib,;I FK KIHI, SLIiJF-tK5 K t 603 riD 4J4b IU 7Jl�.S(ll�Jbdb r'. bl/✓Jl ®e i d i■■ 6 ad a Comments Due By:^s�'s E211ege ort Collins Zoning Department Minor Amendmen File # Ave, PO Box 580 plannersCO 80522 Effective Date oC d3-UY 2745 FAX (970) 224-6134 Minor Amendment Application Form Date Submitted: Project Name' Ktae Soeplf.S fvewae qy 1Z1epEN Minor Amendment Fee: $192.00 Project Location (Street Address)_ -VE cVW40. of TX-gLlel, Legal Description: LOT ( R1 60 FARM IITA Fl -t.t e General Information: List all property ,mrs;=Inga IegaVequitable interest in the property (Attach separate sheets ijnecessary). Owner's Name (s): ILK.P - "Le- mow- f6asw /LeeJf c O Street Address: !I 5. pEaNSy Lry"m sm City/StmerDp: DM-A4ML Co %07 Telephone: C3e�)�77-o3Q,b� Fax: Applic2nt's/COa5alt9af'3 Name: GA(LL_', 15efiMl tiTt.E 14 Name of firm: 641u,0WI ig..5t+f, A�tn-rES Street Address: r5350 brCity/Statdzip: QU— V a eoll, Telephone: 903.--Jo. f3881_____ Fax; 303.7"10. 3b3(e Email• cart_scw^idtla:n�'ra4. ca' SUBMITTAL RE U REME1NTS, 1) Six (6) copies of RECORDED plan (i.e. site, landscape, elevation • whichever is being altered) in 24" x 36" size (available at the Technical Services Department at 281 N. College) — RED -LINE THE CHANGES ON FIVE (5) OF THE COPIES; 2) Completed and signed application form; and 3) Application fee of $192.00. MINOR AMENDMENT Detailed description of the change and reason(s) for the request LoT Rt60e0 wart Bits Ft trtL w±s--�NJLD As a, t,.rr.,nt�wxsa. oc -rum ?nod air o[.tc�r..e as Q Fe0.-r4 t"*pS AT _ �t r_t�ed fY.0.tN . St.ICf E,rnert a fi - ►.t0 L.A aJT o 1PT al.a tsPSAASa hT ii1: r is rrLoata[o Tb Erresaig 11£ QHposED -T1rf of o0.\twa� �Pa+ b � P H ao,t_ W9�"e> A CCf SSoL'L FJr e.IJC JS4 'R A'.1CJLoL•. L r Vc to C_J& �'�'� W�A( -�toICD PkoJC ct 'P- Etrp.,.e�T DtM1 ph0 �fi0 � �£ L OiyprJc '- EtL.tP'lh.t p<nraS bite n atafEp, CERTIFICATION 1 certify the information and exhibits submined are true and correct to the best of my latowledge and that in riling this applieahon, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and aulliodiy of the owners of the property (including all owners having a legal or equitable interest in the teal property, as defined m Scaiou 1-2 of the City Code; which L the subject of this application) without whose consent and authority the requested aetion should not lawfully tr a ruplishcd. Pun:uant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to Mier upon the propany for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for posting n public notice on the propeny. Name(pleam PRINT): h l I Addtev: + F� O ZL3 ** TOTFIL PRGE.61 ** Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Page 2 of 6 01/04/2006 1:47:18 PM Department/Description 03/05/2004 Action Taken HLD Entered By Sheri Wamhoff Comments (if any) The project name is incorrect on the minor amendment sheet. The project name is Rigden Farm 8th Filing - The Shops at Rigden Farm 1.: We can not approve revisions to the Rigden Farm Sth Filing The Shops at King Soopers utility plans until those plans have been approved. They are currently in the process of receiving signatures, but can not be fully signed until we receive the off -site easements that are needed for the work contained in these drawings. 2._-Utility plan revisions will need to be made. If the revision drawings are to be done by a different engineer than prepared the original set of plans they will need to be numbered within that set. Tie into the design contained within that set. We will have to determine what sheets need to be provided. These plans will need to show all work that will need to be done within the boundary shown (i.e. the storm sewer is not existing, the waterline is not existing, the sanitary sewer is not existing). Those items need to be shown on these plans and all information that was a part of the original set for constructing these lines on the sheets that you are replacing need to be provided (such as pipe lengths, pipe types, etc). These sheets will be substituted for what is to be built within the boundaries shown on these plans. Will also need to include the indemnification statements that we require on your sheets. See the check sheet and copy of general notes for the notes that need to be included and general items that need to be a part of the plans. 3.. Based on what was submitted I will assume that you are going to go with a different engineer to do the revisions and the following comments will reflect that. 4. Are there any changes to the site and landscape plans? I do not know if there was any landscaping previously shown adjacent to the building where the drainage pan is proposed. 5. _All plans need to show the easements and property lines that will be on this lot once the plat is filed. 6. Showing items on these plans that are old design and/ or are not sure what they are. Have shaded squares on the plans that are not identified and the storm sewer design at the access drive is an old design. 7. The property line needs to be labeled correctly - it will be the lot line. 8. Need to show the new sidewalk location for the sidewalk on Timberline Road. The sidewalk will be removed and relocated to the back of the new right-of-way to accommodate the turn lane needed for the access into this site and the future additional travel lane that will be added once Timberline is widened to three travel lanes. 9. .Need to make sure that the grading shown corresponds and works with the grading that needs to be done to have the new sidewalk and parkway drain toward the street as shown on the cross sections for the frontage improvements along this site. The grade lines as you show them will not work with that. The east edge of the new sidewalk needs to be the high point and then the grades can slope back toward the building. 10. _ Need to identify that there will be a two foot curb opening where the pan ties into the drive isle. The grades you are showing at the drive isle where the pan will tie in Page 3 of 6 01/04/2006 1:47:18 PM Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) are different than are in the King Soopers plans. You have it identified as 31.48 and the King Soopers have a similar location identified as 30.97. If you are changing the parking lot grades you will need to provide more information. 11..The ramp to the handicap stalls is shown incorrectly. It can not be the type of ramp you are showing as it has no landing and will not meet ADA requirements. The entire walk will need to drop down and you may wish to put a curb head behind the walk at this point. 12. On the utility plan if the dashed lines are the easements then the building is shown extending into the easement that contains the water meter. The building can not be within an easement. I don't think you have the easement located correctly, but if you do the building needs to be modified so it does not extend into the easement. 13. The only items shown on the plans as dashed/ existing should be the sidewalk along Timberline (which will be removed and replaced) and the existing curb and gutter along Timberline. Nothing else on this site is existing at this time. 14. Need to provide City signature blocks on each revised utility plan sheet. 15.. The title block on these sheets needs to read'Rigden Farm 8th Filing - The Shops at Rigden Farm'as that is what the utility plan set is called that is being revised. Remove the address from the title as well. The plat has not been filed on this site and as such an address has not been assigned this property yet. 16.. Remove the information from the revision block. This is will be used if there are to be any revisions made to these sheets after they are approved. 17. The two sheets provided would need to be numbered as follows: The grading plan would be sheet C10A of 59 and the utility plan would be sheet C15A of 59. If additional sheets are added we will need to determine how they fit into the numbering of the original set of plans. Page 4 of 6 01/04/2006 1:47:18 PM Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) 12/07/2004 HLD Sheri Wamhoff No site or landscape plans were received for review. Comments on the 2 utility plan revision sheets: 1. -:Need to include the 3 indemnification statements on these 2 sheets. They are: I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design, revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. These plans have been reviewed by the Local Entity for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the Local Entity Engineer, or the Local Entity for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed in any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the Local Entity for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. The engineer who has prepared these plans, by execution and/or seal hereof, does hereby affirm responsibility to the Local Entity, as beneficiary of said engineer's work, for any errors and omissions contained in these plans, and approval of these plans by the Local Entity Engineer shall not relieve the engineer who has prepared these plans of all such responsibility. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the engineer hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Local Entity, and its officers and employees, from and against all liabilities, claims, and demands which may arise from any errors and omissions contained in these plans. 2. The handicap signs need to be placed behind the sidewalk not within it. 3. _ Need to make sure that the easements and property lines are shown correctly on the plans. 4. Are there changes to the site and landscape plans? I do not know if there was any landscaping shown in the area where the pan is proposed. Provide at least 3 copies of revised utility plans and landscape plans(1 set for erg, 1 set for sw, 1 set for ww) for review. 03/16/2005 HLD Sheri Wamhoff Provided that W W W and Stormwater are okay with the plans - Please submit mylar copies of the plans for signature. These can be submitted directly to Sheri Wamhoff in Engineering. O6/03/2005 CMNT Sheri Wamhoff plans approved - need mylar and prints and copies returned. 11/07/2005 OK Sheri Wamhoff final plans received STORMWATER ENGINEERING 03/05/2004 HLD Sheri Wamhoff This needs to be sent to stormwater as well as they are revising the grading drainage and erosion control plans and stormwater is a signator on those plans. I did not have an extra set to send them. Please provide spot elevations along drainage pan and at the point where that pan enters the flow line in the drive. How do these elevations match up with those shown on the 8th Filing plans ?? Page 5 of 6 01/04/2006 1:47:18 PM Department/Description Action Taken Entered By 03/15/2004 CMNT Basil Harridan 10/01/2004 03/16/2005 WWW - ENGINEERING 03/01 /2004 ZONING 03/14/2005 08/19/2005 02/26/2004 09/16/2004 12/19/2005 Comments (if any) Please provide a signature block for approval. Please add City Standard Erosion Control notes to the plan. Provide Erosion control security estimate. Please clearly identify the limits of improvemenst by this development as opposed to those that will be done by the 81h Filing developer.This needs to be sent to stormwater as well as they are revising the grading drainage and erosion control plans and stormwater is a signator on those plans. I did not have an extra set to send them. Please provide spot elevations along drainage pan and at the point where that pan enters the Flow line in the drive. How do these elevations match up with those shown on the 8th Filing plans ?? CMNT Basil Harridan Please call out the existing storm sewer crossing the site. Identify clearly on the plans what will be built by these plans and what will be built by the KHA plans, make sure grades in parking lot tie in to those designed by Kimley Horn. Call out proposed elevations by the Kimley Horn plans so that we can determine that these would tie in properly. CMNT Basil Harridan Plan OK. Please submit mylars for approval. HLD RBUFFING Provide revised utility plan showing fire line for review and approval. Roger Buffington CMNT RBUFFING Have Kimley Horn include fire line as a revision to utility plans submitted with the PDP and submit for approval. Add detailed notes on the method of connection. OK RBUFFING OK Jenny Nuckols No comments from Zoning CMNT Jenny Nuckols revised plans routed to other departments - 9-16-04 CMNT Jenny Nuckols inactivated minor amendment. 12-19-05, Sent letter to applicant. Page 6 of 6 01/04/2006 1:47:18 PM PROJECT Im"I COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins ZONING DEPT. Minor Amendment Revisions — MA 04022 DATE: September 16, 2004 TO: Engineering - Shari PROJECT: RIDGEN FARM 8T11 — THE SHOPS AT RIGDEN FARM The grading around the proposed First Bank building has been modified to include a concrete pan. The pan is required in order to route run-off away from the building while still maintaining drainage patterns established by Kimley-Horn & Assoc. A 4" fire service line has also been added to provide indoor sprinkler flow. All comments must be returned to Jennifer Nuckols in Zoning by September 30, 2004. PLEASE ENTER YOUR COMMENTS IN PERMITS PLUS. Note - 'LEASE identify your redlines for future reference Name (please print) CI IECK I IERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE, COPIES OF REVISION'S Plat site __Drainage Report Other ......... Utility __Redline Utility Landscape City of Fort Collins COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER IF0347 February 23, 2005 Jennifer Nuckols City of Fort Collins Community Planning and Environmental Services 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Job Name: Comments Issued by: Review Agency Project No.: Name of Submittal: Submittal No.: dment Dear Ms. Nuckols: Attached are copies of the Final Grading and Erosion Control Plan, Overall Utility Plan and Landscape Plan for the above referenced project. These documents are being submitted for final review and approval. This submittal is in response to comments dated January 5, 2005. Comments for the, Rigden Farm minor amendment Comment 1: Comments on the 2 utility plan revision sheets: 1. Need to include the 3 Indemnification statements on these 2 sheets. They are: I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision. In accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design, revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. These plans have been reviewed by the Local Entity for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the Local Entity Engineer, or the Local Entity for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed in any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the Local Entity for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. The engineer who has prepared these plans, by execution and/or seal hereof, does hereby affirm responsibility to the Local Entity, as beneficiary of said engineer's work, for any errors and omissions contained in these plans, and approval of these plans by the Local Entity Engineer shall not relieve the engineer who has prepared these plans of all such responsibility. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the engineer hereby agrees to hold harmless and Indemnify the Local Entity, and its officers and employees, from and against all liabilities, claims, and demands which may arise from any errors and omissions contained in these plans. Page 1 JF,S; ,Ohk Response: The 3 Indemnification statements are now included on the 2 utility plan revision sheets, as requested. Comment 2: The handicap signs need to be placed behind the sidewalk not within it. Response: The handicap signs have been moved behind the sidewalk, within the landscape area, as discussed. Comment_3: Need to make sure that the easements and property lines are shown correctly on the plans. Response: The electrical easement located on the west side of the building has been verified through various and numerous means. Previous location of the electrical easement shown on KHA plans was in error. The easement shown on the attached plans are shown correctly. Comment 4: Are there changes to the site and landscape plans? I do not know if there was any landscaping shown in the area where the plan is proposed. Response: There are currently no changes to the landscape plans. Landscaping is planned around the proposed building. Please see the attached plans. Comment 5: Please call out the existing storm sewer crossing the site. Identify clearly on the plans what will be built by these plans and what will be built by the KHA plans, make sure grades in parking lot tie in to those designed by Kimiey Horn. Call out proposed elevations by the Kimley Horn plans so that we can determine that these would tie in properly. Response: Existing storm sewer crossing the site is now called out on the plans. The plans now indicate Kimley Horn spot elevations in screened text, with the proposed site spot elevations called out in darker text, as requested. Please contact me at 303-797-1200, if you have any questions. Sincerely, J.F. Sato and Associates �illiam F zier, P.E. Project Man ger, cc: Trent Jensen, Davis Partnership Page 2 HS'' I cti kl. COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER JF0347 September 3, 2004 )'), .('iJ Jennifer Nuckols City of Fort Collins �'� 4` V Jug Community Planning and Environmental Services 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 yT RE: Job Name: _ Rigden Farm 8th Filing Comments Issued by: Jennifer Nuckols on March 16, 2004 — r Review Agency Project No.: N/A Name of Submittal: Minor Amendment Submittal No.: 1 Comment: The project name is incorrect on the minor amendment sheet. The project name is Rigden Farm 8`^ Filing - The Shops at Rigden Farm. Response: Minor Amendment Sheet has been revised per comment. Comment 1: We can not approve revisions to the Rigden Farm 8`n Filing The Shops at King Soopers utility plans until those plans have been approved. They are currently in the prccess of receiving signatures, but can not be fully signed until we receive the off -site easements that are needed for the work contained in these drawings. Response: Comment noted. Comment 2: Utility plan revisions will need to be made. If the revision drawings are to be done by a different engineer than prepared the original set of plans they will need to be numbered within that set. Tie into the design contained within that set. We will have to determine what sheets need to be provided. These plans will need to show all work that will need to be done within the boundary shown (i.e. the storm sewer is not existing, the waterline is not existing, the sanitary sewer is not existing). Those items need co be shown on these plans and all information that was a part of the original set for constructing these lines on the sheets that you are replacing need to be provided (such as pipe lengths, pipe types, etc). These sheets will be substituted for what is to be built within the boundaries shown on these plans. Will also need to include the indemnification statements that we require on your sheets. See the check sheet and copy of general notes for the notes that need to be included and general items that need to be a part of the plans. Page 1 JF& 4 Response: Revision drawings will be done by J.F. Sato & Associates (JFSA). Original set of plans was designed and prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates (KHA). JFSA revisions tie into KHA design. JFSA Sheet C10A of 59 will indicate revisions to KHA Sheet C10 of 59. JFSA Sheet CISA of 59 will indicate revisions to KHA Sheet C15 of 59. Design/construction information for the revisions only will be shown on JFSA sheets. A note describing limits of revisions is provided on each sheet. This note also references KHA sheets for all design information falling outside the limits of JFSA revisions. All utilities within the boundary will be shown as proposed on revision sheets. Approval block is included in revision sheets - all other notes and statements can be referenced on KHA sheets. Comment 3: Based on what was submitted, I will assume that you are going with a different engineer to do the revisions and the following comments will reflect that. Response: Yes, a different engineer (JFSA) will be doing the revisions. Comment 4: Are there any changes to the site and landscape plan? I do not know if there was any landscaping previously shown adjacent to the building where the drainage pan is proposed. Response: There are no changes to the site and landscape plans. Included is a copy of the King Soopers landscape plan for your reference. Comment 5: All plans need to show the easements and property lines that will be on this lot once the plat is filed. Response: Easements and property lines are shown on the revision sheets. Comment 6: Showing items on these plans that are old design and/or are not sure what they are. Have :shaded squares on the plans that are not identified and the storm sewer design at the access drive is an old design. Response: Revision sheets have been updated to show the same information as their corresponding KHA sheets. Comment 7: The property line needs to be labeled correctly - it will be the lot line. Response: Property line has been labeled correctly per comment. Comment 8: Need to show the new sidewalk location for the sidewalk on Timberline Road. The sidewalk will be removed and relocated to the back of the new right-of-way to accommodate the turn lane needed for the access into this site and the future additional travel lanes that will be added once Timberline is widened to three travel lanes. Page 2 Approval Items for MA05034 Subdivision: RIGDEN FARM 8 THE SHOPS Site Address: 2632 S TIMBERLINE RD Depa rtment/Descri pti o n CURRENT PLANNING 04/13/2005 05/03/2005 Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) Page 1 of 8 09/13/2005 2:01:02 PM CMNT Steve Olt 1. The canopy does not satisfy the requirements set forth in Section 4.19(E)(3)(a) thru (f) - Canopies of the Land Use Code. The proposed canopy is totally flat -roofed. All canopies shall be designed with a shallow -pitched roof, false mansard or parapet that matches the building. Roofs, false mansards or parapets shall be constructed of traditional roofing materials such as shingles or cementious, clay or concrete tiles, or standing seam metal in subdued, neutral colors in a medium value range.and relate to the neighborhood. The colors shall be designed to relate to other buildings in the commercial center (in this case, the King Soopers store). Scale and design of the canopy and the building underneath must relate to the Rigden Farm residential neighborhood. 2. Freestanding secondary canopies and shade structures that are detached from the building, if any, shall be designed with a pitched roof, or have the appearance of a pitched roof through a false mansard or parapet, to match the primary canopy and relate to the neighborhood character. 3. Canopy fascias and columns cannot be internally illuminated nor externally illuminated with neon or other lighting technique, nor shall canopy fascias or columns be accented, striped or painted in any color except that of the predominant exterior building color. 4. Under -canopy lighting shall be fully recessed with flush - mount installation using a flat lens. There shall be no spot lighting. The minor amendment plans, as submitted, do not provide information on the lighting; therefore, it cannot be determined if this standard is being met.. 5. Per Section 3.8.7(E)(13) of the Land Use Code, one flush wall sign or under -canopy sign per street frontage, not to exceed 12 square feet in area, shall be permitted on or under the fascia of a canopy covering the sales of vehicular fuels. OK Steve Oil J F S. Response: The sidewalk location and right-of-way line on Timberline Road are shown per approved plat and site plan. _Comment 9: Need to make sure that the grading shown corresponds and works with the grading that needs to be done to have the new sidewalk and parkway drain toward the street as shown on the cross -sections for the frontage improvements along this site. The grade lines as you show them will not work with that. The east edge of the new sidewalk needs to be the high point and then the grades can slope back toward the building. Response: Comment addressed. Comment 10: Need to identify that there will be a two foot curb opening where the pan ties into the drive isle. The grades you are showing at the drive isle where the pan will tie in are different than are in the King Soopers plans. You have it identified as 31.48 and the King Soopers have a similar location identified as 30.97. If you are changing the parking lot grades you will need to provide more information. Response: Comment addressed. Two foot curb opening has been identified and grades have been updated to reflect those identified in King Soopers plans by KHA. Comment 11: The ramp to the handicap stalls is shown incorrectly. It can not be the type of ramp you are showing as it has no landing and will not meet ADA requirements. The entire walk will need to drop down and you may wish to put a curb head behind the walk at this point. Response: Ramp at the handicap stalls has been updated to match that proposed in the King Soopers plans by KHA. Comment 12: On the utility plan if the dashed lines are the easements then the building is shown extending into the easement that contains the water meter. The building can not be within an easement. I don't think you have the easement located correctly, but if you do the building needs to be modified so it does not extend into the easement. Response: Easernent was shown in the wrong location. Easement has been updated to match that proposed in the King Soopers plans by KHA. Comment 13: The only items shown on the plans as dashed/existing should be the sidewalk along Timberline (which will be removed and replaced) and the existing curb and gutter along Timberline. Nothing else on this site is existing at this time. Response: Comment addressed. Comment 14: Need to provide City signature blocks on each revised utility plan sheet. Page 3 JFS Response: City signature blocks are included on each revised sheet. Comment 15: The title block on these sheets needs to read 'Rigden Farm 8"' Filing - The Shops at Rigden Farm' as that is what the utility plan set is called that is being revised. Remove the address from the title as well. The plat has not been filed on this site and as such an address has not been assigned this property yet. Response: Comment addressed. Comment 16: Remove the information from the revision block. This will be used if there are to be any revisions made to these sheets after- they are approved. Response: Comment addressed. Comment17: The two sheets provided would need to be numbered as follows: The grading plan would be sheet C10A of 59 and the utility plan would be sheet C15A of 59. If additional sheets are added we will need to determine how they fit into the numbering of the original set of plans. Response: Sheet numbers have been updated per comment. No additional sheets will be required. Comment: Please provide a signature block for approval. Please add City Standard Erosion Control notes to the plan. Provide Erosion control security estimate. Please clearly identify the limits of improvements by this development as opposed to those that will be done by the S' Filing developer. This needs to be sent to stormwater as well as they are revising the grading drainage and erosion control plans and stormwater is a signator on those plans. I did not have an extra set to send them. Please provide spot elevations along drainage pan and at the point where the pan enters the flow line in the drive. How do these elevations match up with those shown on the 8`" Filing plans? Response: Signature Block has been added to each revision sheet. City Standard Erosion Control notes have been added to Sheet C10A of 59, per Basil Hamden's instruction. Erosion control security estimate is included in this submittal for silt fence and seedirig/mulching, prices were obtained from Basil Hamden. A note has been added to each sheet describing the limits of the FirstBank improvements, all improvements not specifically called -out on the revision sheets will be done by 8"' Filing developer (KHA). A copy of this submittal will be sent to Stormwater for review. Spot elevations are provided along the pan as well as the 2' curb opening into the flowline of the drive. All contours tie into King Soccer's plans by KHA . Comment: This needs to be sent to stormwater as well as they are revising the grading drainage and erosion control plans and stormwater is a signator on those plans. I did not have an extra set to send them. Please provide spot elevations along drainage plan and at the point where that pan enters the flow line in the drive. How do these elevations match up with those shown on the 8" Filing plans? Response: See response above. Page 4 Comment: Provide revised utility plan showing fire line for review and approval. Response: Revised utility plan, Sheet C15A of 59, is included in this submittal. JFS Page 5 Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) 04/13/2005 HLD Sheri Wamhoff Rigden Farm 8th Filing - MA05034 4/13/2005 Lot 6 -Gas station General Comments Need to remove the paragraph on the sheet that states that the sheet can not be reproduced without permission of Kroger. We need to be able to reproduce and make copies of the documents that we sign and file. Need to make sure the sheets meet scanning requirements specified in Section E-4 of the Latimer County Urban Area Street Standards. Need to identify where the transformer for Lot 7 is going to be placed since you are removing the transformer to serve that lot. Will also need to provide an easement, by separate document if needed for the new transformer location. Can the ramp on the north island be moved over to the west some so that the crosswalk is more perpendicular? Light and Power needs to be reviewing these plans. The following 3 indemnification statements need to be placed on the utility plan sheets since these sheets are being prepared by a different engineer than the one that did the original set of plans. 1. The engineer who has prepared these plans, by execution and/or seal hereof, does hereby affirm responsibility to the Local Entity, as beneficiary of said engineer's work, for any errors and omissions contained in these plans, and approval of these plans by the Local Entity Engineer shall not relieve the engineer who has prepared these plans of all such responsibility. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the engineer hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Local Entity, and its officers and employees, from and against all liabilities, claims, and demands which may arise from any errors and omissions contained in these plans. 2. 1 hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design, revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. 3. These plans have been reviewed by the Local Entity for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the Local Entity Engineer, or the Local Entity for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed in any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the Local Entity for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. Street Cut fees will apply to all street cuts. Fees are tripled for all streets less than 5 years old, Custer and Iowa are less than 5 years old, thus fees will be tripled for these streets. Once the revised plans have been signed, approved and fled the contractor will need to work with Engineering to obtain a Development Construction Permit to start this lots work. Utility Plans Page 3 of 8 09/13/2005 2:01:02 PM Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) Grading Plan sheet 4 The title can be removed off of the top of the sheet - the title "Rigden Farm 8th Filing - The Shops at Rigden Farm, Lot 6" should be placed in the title block not on the top of the sheet. Label this sheet as sheet C10B of 59 It is not clear how the contours all tie together. Have new/ old and older on the plans. Need to remove the ones that were proposed and not constructed. Need to provide arrows on the plans showing the direction of flow. Make sure that the high point elevations at the entry drive out to Custer are provided on this plan. (Need to verify that the grades and the drainage all work as originally proposed. Need to provide some additional elevations for the parking area on Lot 7 since you are changing some of the elevations. Utility Plan Sheet 5 The title can be removed off of the top of the sheet - the title "Rigden Farm 8th Filing - The Shops at Rigden Farm, Lot 6" should be placed in the title block not on the top of the sheet. Label this sheet as sheet C15B of 59 Need to either modify the original sheet to show the changes and removals or need to show ALL of that on this sheet. You just can't show the lines on this sheet, if they are not to be put in. Need to show the gas line and underground electric line that was shown on the original plans on the north side of the lot. If these are now not going to exist here then need to show that they are going away on this plan or revise the original plan to show the change. You are showing a manhole being located directly over a gas line - that's not going to work. Site Plan The title is "Rigden Farm 8th Filing, The Shops at Rigden Farm, Lot 6" You are proposing the underground fuel tanks within an existing easement area. In order for these tanks to be installed here these easements would need to be vacated. A vacation request can be pursued. In order to proceed with that process I will need a plan showing the area being requested for vacation with dimensions (if a 24 x 36 drawing is provided I will need 8 copies). All the items identified on this plan to be done by others are items that need to be done with Rigden Farm 8th Filing (the project of which this is a part of) and will need to be in place for this project to get a certificate of occupancy. Are there any parking spaces to be defined on the site? Not showing the utilities along Custer as proposed on the utility plan. Landscape Plan Need to provide the standard note regarding planting spacing from utilities. Showing plantings over the sewer line and manhole. Page 4 of 8 09113/2005 2:01:02 PM Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) 05/09/2005 HLD Sheri Wamhoff Rigden Farm 8th Filing - MA05034 5/6/2005 Lot 6 - Gas station General Comments Light and Power needs to be reviewing these plans as they are a sign off on the utility plans. You should be getting a call from Monica Moore with Light and Power to coordinate the transformer location. Where ever the transformer is to be placed it will need to be within a dedicated utility easement. The following 3 indemnification statements need to be placed on the utility plan sheets since these sheets are being prepared by a different engineer than the one that did the original set of plans. They have not yet been included. 1. The engineer who has prepared these plans, by execution and/or seal hereof, does hereby affirm responsibility to the Local Entity, as beneficiary of said engineer's work, for any errors and omissions contained in these plans, and approval of these plans by the Local Entity Engineer shall not relieve the engineer who has prepared these plans of all such responsibility. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the engineer hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Local Entity, and its officers and employees, from and against all liabilities, claims, and demands which may arise from any errors and omissions contained in these plans. 2. 1 hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design, revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. 3. These plans have been reviewed by the Local Entity for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the Local Entity Engineer, or the Local Entity for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed in any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the Local Entity for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. Provide City Signature Blocks on all 3 utility sheets Remove revisions notes in the revision blocks - this area should be blank when we sign the plans. This area is to note revisions made to the plans after they are approved. Street Cut fees will apply to all street cuts. Fees are tripled for all streets less than 5 years old. Custer and Iowa are less than 5 years old, thus fees will be tripled for these streets. Once the revised plans have been signed, approved and filed the contractor will need to work with Engineering to obtain a Development Construction Permit to start this lots work. Utility Plans Erosion Control Sheet Label this sheet as sheet C13A of 59 Sheet C10B of 59 Make sure that the high point elevations at the entry drive out to Custer are provided on this plan. (Need to verify Page 6 of 8 09/13/2005 2:01:02 PM Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) that the grades and the drainage all work as originally proposed. Need to provide some additional elevations for the parking area on Lot 7 since you are changing some of the elevations. It looks like a portion of this curb will need to be reconstructed with this set due to elevation changes. Sheet as sheet C15B of 59 Item #16 on the schedule - this line is not existing, but being proposed with these plans. Site Plan Make sure the transformer location is correct (once coordinated with light and power). 06/21/2005 OK Sheri Wamhoff plans signed POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY 04/26/2005 OK RGONZALE ok to start with previous comment 04/26/2005 CMNT RGONZALE the UST installing contractor is required to acquire a permit from the fire dept prior to breaking ground for this fueling service project. cutsheets on all fuel related equipment are required with tank submittal. STORMWATER ENGINEERING 04/12/2005 CMNT Basil Harridan Please add a fuel soil containment device that would intercept any spills from the fuel tanks or pumps from getting into the storm drainage system. Please provide an erosion control plan for the pad site if it is to be built after the existing erosion control measures associated with the Rigden 8th Filing development are removed. 05/09/2005 CMNT Basil Harridan Please provide a detail for the grate that is to be installed over the stormceptor. Please provide a profile for the proposed 12" line tieing into the 24" storm line. Note 16 on sheet C15B calls for this line to be built by the overall developer, however this line was not shown on the original Rigden 8th Filing plans. 06/14/2005 CMNT Basil Hamdan The erosion control notes currently shown on the erosion control plan, are not the City's standard notes Please email me a request for these at my email address of: bhamdan@fcgov.com so that I have your email address and I will send you an electronic copy of these. Add them to the erosion control plan. I have no other comments, and would be ready for mylars at that point. O6/21/2005 OK Basil Harridan Approved. WWW • ENGINEERING 04/11/2005 HLD Jeff Hill The existing water and sewer stubs on the south portion of this site were originally to be used at main stubs for future development. These stubs must be removed at the intersecting mains. Remove the water valve from the tee and install a plug then thrust block the plug. Remove the sanitary sewer pipe from the manhole and seal opening closed with non shrink grout. 05/09/2005 HLD Jeff Hill See previous comment. Additional fire hydrant on this site is not warrented. Additional plans showing proposed sanitary sewer lines were never submitted nor approved for this site. 06/21/2005 OK Jeff Hill Page 7 of 8 09/13/2005 2:01:02 PM Department/Descri pti on ZONING 03/28/2005 03/30/2005 04/13/2005 Action Taken Entered By CMNT Peter Barnes CMNT HLD 04/22/2005 CMNT 04/26/2005 OK 06/07/2005 CMNT 06/09/2005 CMNT O6/16/2005 CMNT Page 8 of 8 09/13/2005 2:01:02 PM Peter Barnes Peter Barnes Peter Barnes Peter Barnes Peter Barnes Peter Barnes Peter Barnes Comments (if any) APPLICATION RECD 4-25-05, BUT NEED SITE SPECIFIC UTILITY PLANS. APPLICATION WILL BE ROUTED TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS ONCE UTILITY PLANS ARE RECEIVED. Received plans 4-29-05 1) 5 canopy signs are shown, but only 1 canopy sign is allowed per the sign code, and it can't exceed 12 sq. ft. 2) Indicate what kind of under canopy lighting will be used. Code requires fully recessed, flush -mounted, with flat lens. 3) Canopy must comply with design standards in Section 4A 9(E)(3) of the Land Use Code. revisions received and routed 4-22-05 Ok with condition that the "merchandise signs" mounted on the columns are not allowed per the sign code. Only one canopy sign is permitted "on or under" the canopy per Section 3.8.7(E)(13). revisions received 6-7-05 and routed 6-8-05 additional replacement sheets routed on 6-9-05. revisions recd 6-16-05 and routed to Sheri, Jeff, and Basil City of Fort Collins Zoning Department Comments Due By:__ Sr.= Minor Amcndmcnt htle ,1 I -,' 4 ->< r 281 N College Ave, PO Box 580 1 ort Col Ilns, CO 80522 Planner I ;1 Li-- rffcctive Date Citv(if Fort Collins 970) 41(i 2745 FAX (970) 224-6i3al - -- - Minor Amendment Application Form Date Submitted log ProµctName -. V-',4 .ems. Fes.,,,... 4311• v A),,. TL.�_ 5�..c 6 -k � 1'roieet LOCI 11n❑ (Street Address): 2-1 Z� -T L Minor Amendment Fee: $192.00 Legal Description: General Information. /.ict all propp r tv oxncrs having a legal/equitable interest in the rrL-� operty (Attach separate she is if necessary). Owner's N:uuc (s): F_.isk $-_.•-•)C(�._--(' {�" 'CH � Co (c­)--�rfd, Cu+�ia; 1N Street Address: 123y5 W LU)SG�>F AVt, city/State/zip: ovA"LD 9021c:, Telephone: 2 I4cG, l— __ Fax: 1)'A d1 , Applicant's/Consultant's Name„ _ �Y'�.J�. �iZ O'�2-+ Y�E Name of firm: Street Address: S_._<.%� S} _ City/State/Zip: %�•i��.z�o'2 C� Teiephoue: "'z�'} {�j �. = 1200 ---_ Fax:-'L" SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1) Six (6) copies of RECORDED plan (i.e. site, landscape, elevation - whichever is being altered) in 24" x 36" size (available at the Technical Services Department at 28 t N. College) -RED-LINE THE CHANGES ON FIVE (5) OF THE COPIES; 2) Completed and signed application form; and 3) Application fee of S 192,00, MINOR AMENDMENT Detailed description of the change and reasons) for the request: i tee_ K -to pvvvt�e v�00✓ �p✓In��L✓ CERTIFICATION I certify the information ;md exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, 1 am acting with the knomdedge, conscN, and authority of the owners of the property (including all owners having a legal or equitable interest in the real property, as defined in Sccuon 1-2 ofthe City Code, whuch is the subject of this application) without whose consent and authority the requested action should not lam -full' he accomplished_ Pursuant to said authority. I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for posting n public notice ou the property. S,mtc (please PRINT): - S-fg-�xi�C�' ✓� � e LS �- �� __ ( C�i (/ _ �— Addresv:_.1 �' _ 1.��l/,C()l'(_ 9'elephonc:_ �✓ � _7J — Approval Items for MA04022 Subdivision: Rigden Farm 8 Filing -The Shops Site Address: 2644 S TIMBERLINE RD Department/Description CURRENT PLANNING [�R743�1Pd�UE 03/18/2005 Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) CMNT Steve Olt The proposed concrete drainage pan has an affect on the landscaping on the north and west sides of the bank building that was approved with the POP. Also, the 4" fire service line may have an affect on the landscaping on the east side of the building. Therefore, a revised landscape plan must be submitted for review. CMNT Steve Olt The Landscape Plan attached to Zoning's current packet still does not show the proposed new drainage pans along the north and west sides of the building. These pans would impact the landscaping on the approved Landscape Plan. A revised Landscape Plan must be submitted for review. Page 1 of 6 01/04/2006 1:47:18 PM