HomeMy WebLinkAboutOVERLOOK AT WOODRIDGE PUD FOURTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-09-13PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 2000 DEPT: DEV. REV. ENG.
PROJECT: The Overlook @ Woodridge Taft Hill Road Widening
ENGINEER: Eileen Baynes
All comments must be received by: June 16, 2000
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Comments:
• The planned improvements done by TST needs to reference the appropriate Sear Brown plans within
the submittal plan set, or be a separate plan set altogether.
• Cross -sections at .50' intervals are needed for both temporary and ultimate where such does not
already exist on the original plan set. The temporary condition should show road cross -slopes,
elevations at crown, east flowline, and west edge of pavement in relation to the right-of-way. A 4:1
slope needs to be maintained behind the west edge of pavement.
• The ultimate cross-section should show how permanent improvements would work with this design.
• It appears that two different sections of Brixton Road will be removed and replaced as part of the
waterline extension and road improvements, wouldn't it be better if the entire section was removed?
• Where will curb & gutter be removed and replaced on the plan set (i.e. west side of Brixton and Taft
Hill has substandard curb and gutter, will this be replaced?)
• Provide proposed flowline elevations on profile view and show finished grading on plan set.
(See plans for additional comments)
Date: June 16, 2000 Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
0 Plat 0 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Re rt 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
City of Fort Collins
Current Plannin
DATE:
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: AA
gLAN_NER:
ENGINEER:
eNo Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
The Overlook at Woodridge PUD, Fourth Filing (Phase 2) June 6, 1998
• Delete General Note 13.
• Redo the indlex to list only the sheets that are in this set and number them consecutively.
At the bottom of the list note that: See The overlook at Woodridge PUD Fourth Filing for
design of Phase 1 improvements. Also see Harmony Road Realignment Taft Hill Road
County Road 38E Utility Plans for design of those roads.
• Put `(Phase 2)' at the end of the utility plan title to distinguish it from the first set.
• The striping plans show sidewalks to the south of the development - show these on the
overall utility plans and final grading plan.
Taft Hill Road
• Show the proposed grades that will be tied into on the north end.
• Need to show a pavement transition at the north end in case the final improvements that
are shown to be tying into arc not constructed. Also provide notes to indicate only to be
done if final improvements to the north are not completed.
• Provide a section a the existing driveway (west side) to show how what if any grading is
needed to tic the driveway back in.
(Continued on next page)
Date: Signature:
❑ AT
M
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF ARKED REVISIONS. PL
-'SITE
,O--UTILITY
LANDSCAPE
The Overlook at Woodridge PUD, Fourth Filing (Phase 2) June 6, 1998
(page 2 of 2)
• The striping plan at the north end doesn't correspond to the striping plan included with
the Harmony Road Plans.
• On the cross sections indicate the section line and centerline locations. Minimum slope is
a 4:1 adjust the slopes accordingly. Provide a note; See typical x-section on detail sheet
for additional requirements for sidewalk placement.
• The Harmony Road striping plan - This portion of the road is already built. It would
seem this sheet would be better placed in the plan set in which the road plans are. It
could be done as a revision to the set. The cover sheet (index) would need to be changed
to add it.
• Brixton Road - This road does not meet the approach grade requirements. Per the
standards (Section 1.02.03.05 a. and c.) the slope on this street should not exceed 2%.
Since this can now not be meet a variance request is needed. Please provide this.
• Mesa View Court - show the crown line and indicate it's offset. Also label the cul-de-sac
slopes from the high point.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current
DATE: V/2[A$ DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: i_1 AT ES @ Woodr,6-je PLO,
PLANNER: i �h Z and 3i
ENGINEER: :SNERI WAmNoF*:
❑ No Problems
LJ' Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Gates at Woodridge PUD, 4" Filing May 30, 1998
Return 'Information for Development Agreements' form filled out.
New plat should be a part of this plan set.
Utility Plans
• Delete note I from the General Notes.
Sheet 6 - The new contours do not always tie into existing contours.
Sheet 7
• Show new proposed lot layout
• The path that goes between lots 31 and 32, connect to court in an area that is not over the
top of an inlet.
• Flare the path connections where they meet the street sidewalk.
• Minor amendment is needed for the changes to the path system.
• There was originally an additional path connection shown to Weber School. Why has
this been eliminated?
• The temporary fire hydrant to be installed with phase 2 with conflict with the emergency
access drive needed to provide two points of access.
(Continued on next page)
u/2/gr 6. GUczmh
Date: Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: PLAT
0"SITE
ff' UTILITY
❑ LANDSCAPE
Gates at Woodridge PUD, 411 Filing (sheet 2 of 2)
May 30, 1998
Sheet 9
• The barricade notes need to be modified and or eliminated. Phase two does not meet
Emergency access requirements without providing a temporary emergency access
connection Rolling Gate Road and Greengate Drive. The Phase lines could also be
modified to show this portion of road being constructed with Phase 2.
Sheet 10
• Where Redgate Court was eliminated the grades need to be modified. Provide minimum
grades (.4%) into the inlet and appropriate grade breaks.
Sheet 20
• See notes on Plans regarding Swale sections.
Sheet 26
• Provide proof that easements have been dedicated or provide easements.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: May 8, 1998 TO: Mapping/Drafting
PROJECT: #55-67N Replat of the Gates at Woodridge
P.U.D., 4th Filing (Loss of 5 lots and vacation of
Redgate Court) - Replat
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting;:
Wednesday, June 10,1998
JJi�oj' GltaKge - W�`� qrc.
oi+zr ` ARC ✓� LUTs �S� u 7
/DoG1 ti o
3. SET Cl�c 2i s CUAlMG-N'rs A91o' TR/�CT t�1�0�s
L r c. , -- 13 G
Date:
I N C' L-'i ,D �-o
CHECK HERE IF YOU IVIM TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat _ Site _ Dcaio p Report _ Oler
_ UWity _ REae Utility _ Lads*
9
2City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planniing
DATE: May 8, 1998 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: 955-67N Replat of the Gates at Woodrige PUD, 41' Filing
(Loss of 5 lots and vacation of Redgate Court) - Replat
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, June 10, 1998
Replat of the Gates at Woodridge PUD, 41h Filing June 1, 1998
• Plat can not be filed until the vacation of Redgate Court is complete.
• The plat should be included as a part of the Utility Plans under review.
• Label the lots with an `A' to distinguish them from the lots in the first plat (i.e. 10A,
14A, I I IA)
• All areas that were portions of lots that are being replat into Tracts need to be included
within the boundaries of the plats - other wise technically they remain as the lots they
were plated.. The Tracts need to be labeled.
• Need to either indicate all the easements that are to be vacated with this plat (such as
across lots 12A and 13A) or modify the dedication statement and indicate that all
easements other than those shown on the plat are vacated with this replat
• In review of the utility plans it appears that a 3 foot drainage easement is needed along
the Northeast property line of lot 12A. Based on Section B-20.
Date: Signature: S 0""
CH K HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS:
_ Xlat Site _ Drainage Report Other
Utility _ Redline Utility — Landscape
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planninl
DATE: 0/2/q$ DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: �, AT ES e Woodr tckle PLW , y'w` Vl� k j'�5
PLANNER: ( Z 0_n8 S)
ENGINEER: SAEQI wAmNoFr-:
❑ No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Gates at Woodridge PUD, 4°' Filing May 30, 1998
Return `Information for Development Agreements' form filled out.
New plat should be a part of this plan set.
Utility Plans
• Delete note 13 from the General Notes.
Sheet 6 - The new contours do not always tie into existing contours.
Sheet 7
• Show new proposed lot layout
• The path that goes between lots 31 and 32, connect to court in an area that is not over the
top of an inlet.
• Flare the path connections where they meet the street sidewalk.
• Minor amendment is needed for the changes to the path system.
• There was originally an additional path connection shown to Weber School. Why has
this been eliminated?
• The temporary fire hydrant to be installed with phase 2 with conflict with the emergency
access drive needed to provide two points of access.
(Continued on next page)
tolz/9R' 6, GUamhe
Date: Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: [}PLAT
D"SITE
e-' UTILITY
❑ LANDSCAPE
Gates at Woodridge PUD, 4" Filing (sheet 2 of 2) May 30, 1998
Sheet 9
• The barricade notes need to be modified and or eliminated. Phase two does not meet
Emergency access requirements without providing a temporary emergency access
connection Rolling Gate Road and Greengate Drive. The Phase lines could also be
modified to show this portion of road being constructed with Phase 2.
Sheet 10
• Where Redgate Court was eliminated the grades need to be modified. Provide minimum
grades (.4%) into the inlet and appropriate grade breaks.
Sheet 20
See notes on Plans regarding Swale sections.
Sheet 26
• Provide proof that easements have been dedicated or provide easements.
City of Fort Collin,
Current Plannin E
DATE: Wt/1 g
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: r t je� ?U0 L: A
ENGINEER:
eNo Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
The Overlook at Woodridge PUD, Fourth Filing (Phase 2) June 6, 1998
• Delete General Note 13.
• Redo the index to list only the sheets that are in this set and number them consecutively.
At the bottom of the list note that: See The overlook at Woodridge PUD Fourth Filing for
design of Phase I improvements. Also see Harmony Road Realignment Taft Hill Road
County Road 38E Utility Plans for design of those roads.
• Put `(Phase 2)' at the end of the utility plan title to distinguish it from the first set.
• The striping plans show sidewalks to the south of the development - show these on the
overall utility plans and final grading plan.
Taft Hill Road
• Show the proposed grades that will be tied into on the north end.
• Need to show a. pavement transition at the north end in case the final improvements that
are shown to be tying into are not constructed. Also provide notes to indicate only to be
done if final improvements to the north are not completed.
• Provide a section a the existing driveway (west side) to show how what if any grading is
needed to tie the driveway back in.
(Continued on next page)
Date: Signature:
❑ PLAT
PLEASE SEND Cur IES OF MARKED REVISIONS.
,O--SITE
a —UTILITY
,E3-�LANDSCAPE
The Overlook at Woodridge PUD, Fourth Filing (Phase 2) June 6, 1998
(page 2 of 2)
• The striping plan at the north end doesn't correspond to the striping plan included with
the Harmony Road Plans.
• On the cross sections indicate the section line and centerline locations. Minimum slope is
a 4:1 adjust the slopes accordingly. Provide a note; See typical x-section on detail sheet
for additional requirements for sidewalk placement.
• The Harmony Road striping plan - This portion of the road is already built. It would
seem this sheet would be better placed in the plan set in which the road plans are. It
could be done as a revision to the set. The cover sheet (index) would need to be changed
to add it.
• Brixton Road - This road does not meet the approach grade requirements. Per the
standards (Section 1.02.03.05 a. and c.) the slope on this street should not exceed 2%.
Since this can now not be meet a variance request is needed. Please provide this.
• Mesa View Court - show the crown line and indicate it's offset. Also label the cul-de-sac
slopes from the high point.
DATE: ember 25, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #55-87M The Overlook @ Woodridge, 4th
Filing, Phase 2 - LDGS
Al comments must be received by Ted Shedpard no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, December 16, 1998
❑ No Comment
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
The Overlook at Woodridge, 4t' Filing, Phase 2
December 31, 1998
Provide off -site casement for grading along Taft Hill Road. This easement is needed prior to the
signing of mylars by engineering.
Variance request for Brixton Road has been accepted.
Date: 1 4/31/ 1
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
-Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Ol ler
Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape
mAa
City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE:5-29-97 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: The Overlook At Woodridge P.U.D.
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
Harmony Rd. Plans
1. How is the 30" storm drain line in Harmony being connected at end of Phase 1 and
beginning of Phase 2 ? Please label connection.
2. Please detail the FCLWD pump station intersection and describe access surface, fence
relocation, sidewalk ramp details, etc.
3. Please widen Harmony Rd. at the Taft intersection to accommodate 12' right and left turn
lanes. Adjust overall street alignment to best align the thru lanes to 38E. Re -stripe the bike
lane to be between the thru and right turn lane at the 38E intersection.
4. Please profile the driveways affected by the 38E intersection improvements, on the plans
and label their location if not on the same sheet as the plan view.
5. City water dept has completed their water line extension. Please show new extension.
6. I have included a letter from L&P about how they plan on changing their duct bank routing.
Please contact Janet McTague and include their new routing and the limits of their
abandonment in the plans.
7. Please separate the Harmony Rd. realignment plans from the Overlook plan set. The City
desires Harmony Rd. to be an independent project from the Overlook project.
****************** See other comments through out the plans *************************
Date: S 30 " 9-7 Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
UTILITY
LANDSCAPE
The Overlooks @ Woodridge 4Ih Filing (Phases 2)
City Comments and Responses — from December 31, 1998
Sherri Wamhoff
• Conmnent: Provide off -site easement for grading along Taft Hill Road. This easement is
needed prior to the signing of mylars by engineering.
• Response: As per your conversation with Stan Myers, we arc submitting the mylars so that
the process can continue knowing that the easement will be secured shortly.
434011 9
.F�71:,Yj REVISION
DATE: ember 25, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #55-870 The Gates @ Woodridge, Filing 4,
Phases 2 & 3 - Type 1 (LUC) - PDP
All comments must be received by Ted Shedpard nol i r than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, December 16, 1998
❑ No Comment
13-1'�-Problcros or Concerns (see below or attached)
LCQ_�_ ( a -Cs cgr� �Ica3 '�vtdlccc4► 1Q�cl�artp Cp�aXt
19q 8
Date: I —/ Z I
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH[ TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ PW _ site _ DiaiNe Repod _ Met
Utility _ Redhne' Ut h_ Landscape
Q21=0
City of Fort Collins
w
DATE: November 25, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #55-87M The Overlook @ Woodridge, 4th
Filing, Phase 2 - LDGS
All comments must be received by Ted Shedpard no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, December 16, 1998
❑�No Comment
IJ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
The Overlook at Woodridge, 4'h Filing, Phase 2
December 31, 1998
Provide off -site easement for grading along Taft Hill Road. This easement is needed prior to the
signing of mylars by engineering.
Variance request for Brixton Road has been accepted.
Date: t Z /31/ `?
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ pit _ Site _ Drainage Rgod _ Oler
Utility _ Redlme Utility _ Landscape
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
c.
tP
DATE: September 8, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #55-870 The Gates at Woodridge, 4th Filing
(Phases 2 and 5) Including the Replat of Gates @
Woodridge
All comments (must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, September 30,1998
Gates at Woodridge, 4" Filing October 2, 1998
Still showing a temporary hydrant that may interfere with the emergency access needed in order
to construct phase 2.
The note regarding the temporary emergency access should read - Provide a 20 foot wide 4 inch
compacted aggregate base course accessway.
A minor amendment is needed for revisions to the sidewalk/ path system running through the
site. This needs to be submitted to Planning. There was a site/landscape plan that was submitted
with this review label Administrative Change # 1. Is this something that was previously
approved or is this the submittal for minor amendment? This plan does not show the removal of
Redgate Court or the path in the correct location. It also shows retaining walls that are not
indicated in the grading plans.
The street vacation needs to be taken to council yet. I do not want to take this until we are close
on the plan approval - I will be checking with Stormwater to determine how things are
progressing and will need to know what is your intended schedule.
Date:
/
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
FA
DAT :ember 8, 1998 TO: Engineering
0V EY- LOOt-
PROJECT: #55-87M The - at Woodridge, 4th Filing
(Phase 2)
All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than the staff
review meeting;:
Wednesday, September 30,1998
Overlook at Woodridge, 4th Filing, Phase 2
October 9, 1998
The approved plans for Taft Hill Road show the grade that is being tied into as .45% not .40%.
They also show the centerline/ section line elevation to be 53.27 not 53.21. The design needs to
be adjusted accordingly.
Provide a profile of the access drive at sta —21+25 This is not provided as a part of the Harmony
Road realignment plans.
Provide a note on the striping plan that the cross striping in the bike lane needs to be removed if
it existing.
There arc two issues on this project which are still under review. The profile of existing Braxton
Road and Taft Hill and the variance request for the design of Braxton on this property. Once
these have been fully review and a decision is made I will notify you.
Date: Signature:
City of Fort Conins
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: September 8, 1998 TO: Mapping
PROJECT: #55-870 The Gates at Woodridge, 4th Filing
(Phases 2 and 5) Including the Replat of Gates @
Woodridge
All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than the staff
review meeting;:
Wednesday, September 30,1998
aQ Cow,�d ME 51
Date: 4 Z '3 Signature:
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: ember 8, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #55-870 The Gates at Woodridge, 4th Filing
(Phases 2 and 5) Including the Replat of Gates @
Woodridge
All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, September 30,1998
Gates at Woodridge., 4" Filing October 2, 1998
Still showing a temporary hydrant that may interfere with the emergency access needed in order
to construct phase 2.
The note regarding the temporary emergency access should read - Provide a 20 foot wide 4 inch
compacted aggregate base course accessway.
A minor amendment is needed for revisions to the sidewalk/ path system running through the
site. This needs to be submitted to Planning. There was a site/landscape plan that was submitted
with this review label Administrative Change # 1. Is this something that was previously
approved or is this the submittal for minor amendment? This plan does not show the removal of
Rcdgate Court or the path in the correct location. It also shows retaining walls that are not
indicated in the grading plans.
The street vacation needs to be taken to council yet. I do not want to take this until we are close
on the plan approval - I will be checking with Stormwater to determine how things are
progressing and will need to know what is your intended schedule.
Date: c�� /`�-� Signature: , h
City of Fort Collins