Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATERFIELD PUD FIRST FILING - Filed DCP-DEV. CONSTRUCTION PERMIT - 2005-08-23City of Fort Collins, Colorado DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: 99-12 Issuance Date: S.r7.4y Project Name: Waterfield PUD, First Filing — Bull Run Apartments Project Location: Northwest quadrant of the intersection of East Vine Drive and Timberline Road (CR 9E) Permittee: Bull Run Limited Partnership City and developer contacts: See attached Exhibit "A" for names and phone numbers of all contact persons for this project. Fees: Permit Application Fee (paid at the time of application) $300.00 waived Excavation permit $445.00 Construction Inspection Fee (paid prior to issuance of this permit) $40.238.00 waived Total $40,983.00* ' The permit application fee and the inspection fee have been waived for the Bull Run portion of Waterfield PUD, First Filing. The permitee shall only be responsible for paying the excavation permit fee of $445.00. Development Bond or other approved security: Amount of security deposited with the City to guarantee the completion of all public improvements to be constructed as shown on the approved plans for the development. $819,598.64* Expiration date: n/a " Form of security deposited with the City: n/a * The security deposited with the City has been waived for the Bull Run portion of Waterfield PUD, First Filing PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. The Project Engineer shall be responsible to certify, or have certified, materials testing and other tests as required, shall, as required by the City in the Development Agreement, certify that the improvements are constructed in accordance with the approved Utility Plans and the standards and specifications of the City; shall revise and secure City approval of all revisions to the utility plans and related documents; and shall prepare and submit to the City "as -constructed" plans prior to the City's acceptance of "the constructed" public improvements. 2. All contractors who perform work on this project must be bonded and licensed in conformance with City requirements. 3. Construction time restrictions: N/A PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: January 22, 1997 DEPT: Engineering Pvmt PROJECT: #7-95B Waterfield PUD Preliminary PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received by: Monday, February 10, 1997 The preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report submitted at final will need to show the volume change % of total by charting the consolidation test. Date: Z / Signature CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins DATE: 30 January, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Water6eld P.U.D., - First Filing ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: February 25, 1998 ®No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE UTILITY PLANS: Sheet No. 1 of 45: Cover Sheet Please include the plat within the utility plans. comments continued on the next page 6* Date: -:zslSe Signature:�- PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ® PLAT ® SITE UTILITY ® LANDSCAPE comments continued from the previous page... Sheet No. 16 of 45: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Please show the storm sewer in the profiles with stationing, invert elevations, and top of pipe elevations. • Please show the future curb return profiles at the intersection of Merganser and Vine in the Merganser profiles. • In looking at the traffic study, the street classifications for the streets intersecting Merganser seem to be wrong. I will be getting in touch with Eric Bracke to discuss this matter. According to the traffic study, those streets need to be residential local streets. Therefore the widths will need to be modified. • Please either provide a plat or indicate the centerline radii for the curves along Merganser Drive on the utility plans. • Please see sheet number 16 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 17 of 45: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Please either provide a plat or indicate the centerline radii for the curves along Merganser Drive on the utility plans. • Please see sheet number 17 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 18 of 45: Garganey Drive • 1 am checking with Eric about the traffic study and the classification of Garganey Drive. It is currently shown as a residential local street and I have a feeling that it should be at least a connector if not a collector. I will let you know ASAP. • Please see sheet number 18 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 19 of 45: Brant, Black Scoter, and Bufflehead Ct. Plan and Profile • If the approach grades do not meet the City standards, you will need to apply for a variance to the street standards. This is in the form of a letter stating the variance and why it cannot be met, etc. • Please see sheet number 19 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 20 of 45: County Road #9E Plan and Profile • You will need to show the grade and ground lines for a minimum of 1000 feet to the south of the construction limits, i.e. south of the Vine Drive/CR9E intersection. This includes both horizontal and vertical alignment of the future curb, gutter, and sidewalk. • Please see sheet number 20 for additional comments and concerns. comments continued on the next page h-► PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current DATE: 17 July, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Watertield P.U.D. - I'Filing PLANNER: Mike Ludwig ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: 12 August, 1998 GENERAL COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE UTILITY PLANS: note: These are the major comments after reviewing the utility plans. Please refer to the individual sheets of the utility plans for more specific comments. Sheet No. 1 of 45: Cover Sheet Please modify the General Notes. comments continued on the next page �* 7 Date: Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _s Plat _x Site _Drainage Report _Other _x_Utility _x_Redline Utility _x_Landscape comments continued from the previous page... Sheet No. 16 of 45: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Please check the elevations at the intersection of Vine Drive and Merganser Drive with respect to the profiles. Sheet No. 19 of 45: Brant, Black Scoter, and Goslyn Ct. Plan and Profile • Please show how the sidewalk and the type R inlet work. Provide a detail as shown for the modified inlet, of the connection with dimensions, tapers, etc. • Please modify the sidewalks as shown. • Please show the detail of the entire sidewalk/inlet area and not just the inlet. Sheet No. 21 b of 45: Timberline Road (south) Future Proposed Plan and Profile • Please recheck the grades and flowline profiles. There seems to be some inconsistencies from sheet 24. • Because of the large grade changes in the centerline profile through the intersection, you will need to design a vertical curve per the street standards. Sheet No. 22 of 45: Timberline Road Cross Sections • Please show the swales, etc. in the cross sections. Include side slopes. Sheet No. 24 of 45: Vine Drive Plan and Profile • Please recheck the grades and flowline profiles. There seems to be some inconsistencies from sheet 21 b. Sheet No. 25 of 45: Vine Drive Plan and Profile • Please show the storm sewer in the profiles. Sheet No. 26 of 45: Vine Drive & Vine Drive (west) Future Plan and Profile • Please show the inlets and storm sewers in the profiles. Include stations and elevations. • The grade change in the southern profile still does not meet the maximum allowable 1.0%. Please address. Sheet No. 27 of 45: Vine Drive Cross Sections • Please show the swales, etc. in the cross sections. Include side slopes. Sheet No. 45a of 45: Drainage Details • Please modify the inlet detail as shown. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins DATE: 13 May, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Waterfield P.U.D. - First Filing ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: June 3, 1998 eNo Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE UTILITY PLANS: Sheet No. 1 of 45: Cover Sheet • Please coordinate your design of Vine Drive with The Sear Brown Group's design. comments continued on the next page %* 1 Date: (-/5ba Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ® PLAT ® SITE ® UTILITY 00 LANDSCAPE comments continued from the previous page... Sheet No. 2 of 3: Final Plat • Sheet 1 of 3 was not included in this submittal. • Please include the legal description of the area being platted. • Are the portions of land that attach the cul-de-sacs to Tract B included in Tract B? Are they included in an access easement? If not, they need to be. • The name of County Road 9E will be called Timberline Road now, not Summit View. Sheet No. 3 of 3: Final Plat • The streets that are coming off of Merganser are considered residential local streets. Please modify the ROW so they reflect the 51 feet as shown in the standards. • The name of County Road 9E will be called Timberline Road now, not Summit View. Sheet No. 16 of 45: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • The grade changes at the intersection of Merganser and Vine does not meet our standards. Please modify the profiles. • Please make sure that the plan view matches the profile view. There are a couple of areas that are showing a vertical curve in the profile but a grade break in the plan view. • See sheet 16 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 17 of 45: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • You are currently showing a street/access on the east side of Merganser that was not shown on the approved Site and Landscape Plans. Please eliminate this street/access. • Please address where the water will drain to after the future street to the west of Merganser is constructed. What will happen to the inlets? Show what will happen once the second phase is constructed. If the storm sewers are going to be removed or relocated, we do not want the newly constructed Merganser to be cut and patched. • There is a portion of the east flowline that doesn't meet our standards. • See sheet 17 for additional comments and concerns. comments continued on the next page w* comments continued from the previous page... Sheet No. 18 of 45: Garganey Drive • Could some of the grade breaks be eliminated where indicated while still maintaining the same % slope on both sides? • Please correct the name of the cul-de-sac indicated on the plans. Sheet No. 19 of 45: Brant, Black Scoter, and Bufflehead Ct. Plan and Profile • The locations of the inlets at the ends of the cul-de-sacs are/will conflict with the pedestrian access ramp. Please relocate either the inlet or sidewalk so as to eliminate this problem. • Please correct the name of the cul-de-sac indicated. • See sheet 19 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 20 of 45: Timberline Road Plan and Profile • Please provide the Cit with information on how the drainage will be handled once curb and gutter is installed (ultimate conditions). Where will the water drain to? Will there be storm sewers? Please address these issues and incorporate them into the ultimate design. Sheet No. 21 of 45: Timberline Road Plan and Profile • See sheet 21 for comments and concerns. Sheet No. 21a of 45: Timberline Road Plan and Profile • What is the reasoning for showing/providing all of the grade breaks? What about just using straight grades for the flowlines? • Why not designing the flowlines using a 0.60% slope? This would allow for future crosspans to be installed without tearing up a large portion of the road to achieve the minimum slope requirement. • Please provide a typical cross section showing the ultimate design. Sheet No. 21 b of 45: Timberline Road (south) Future Proposed Plan and Profile • Please show all locations of grade breaks. • Would it be possible to eliminate some of the grade breaks and provide more straight grades with 0.60% slope? By designing the ultimate roadway at 0.60% it would help when crosspans need to be installed. • Please show the intersection of the RR tracks and how the improvements, both interim and ultimate, work with the crossing. comments continued on the next page �* comments continued from the previous page... • See sheet 21 b for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 22 of 45: Timberline Road Cross Sections • Please recheck the cross sections vs. the profiles. The future flowline grades seem to be inconsistent. • The edge of asphalt grades on the cross sections do not match those on the profiles. Please modify as necessary. • Please make sure that there is a minimum of 4:1 slope away from the back of walk. Make sure that the grading plan reflects this. • Please make sure that after adjusting the elevations that the cross slopes are still maintaining a minimum of 2%. Sheet No. 23 of 45: Timberline Road Cross Sections • See comments on the previous sheet. • See sheet number 23 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 24 of 45: Vine Drive Plan and Profile • Could you please show the intersection of Vine and Merganser on one sheet rather than on two different sheets? • It is my understanding that the Ditch Company will not allow any additional drainage to enter into the ditches. You will therefore have to redesign Vine drive so that only the historical amount is enterin ght editch. The rest will have to drain to the north. • Please show grades for the future profiles and indicate that they are future grades. • The pipe that is crossing the profiles is not what is shown i nthe plan view. • Please modify the grade changes that do not meet our standards. • See sheet 24 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 24a of 45: Vine Drive (east) Future Proposed Plan and Profile • See sheet 24a for comments and concerns. Sheet No. 25 of 45: Vine Drive Plan and Profile • It is my understanding that the Ditch Company will not allow any additional drainage to enter into the ditches. You will theredore have to redesign Vine drive so that only the historical amount is enterin ght editch. The rest will have to drain to the north. comments continued on the next page %* comments continued from the previous page... Please show grades for the future profiles and indicate that they are future grades. Sheet No. 26 of 45: Vine Drive & Vine Drive (west) Future Plan and Profile • It is my understanding that the Ditch Company will not allow any additional drainage to enter into the ditches. You will theredore have to redesign Vine drive so that only the historical amount is entering into the ditch. The rest will have to drain to the north. • Please show grades for the future profiles and indicate that they are future grades. • See sheet 26 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 27 of 45: Vine Drive Cross Sections • The cross sections will need to be modified to reflect the redesign of Vine Drive. • There are a couple of areas that look as though they will trap water. Please check the areas indicated on the plans and modify as needed. • See sheet number 27 for additional comments and concerns. 4. The applicant understands that additional permits may be required for this development project and the applicant shall secure those permits directly from the issuing departments. 5. This permit, along with a complete set of all approved plans and documents for this project (utility plans, site plan, landscape plan, development agreement, soils report, pavement design, traffic study, drainage report, plat easements and any other official documents), shall be kept on the development site available for use by City staff doing inspections. 6. Permit Expiration (in accordance with Section 29-12 of the Transitional Land Use Regulations or Section 2.6.3(K) of the Land Use Code, whichever is applicable): a. If construction has not begun within sixty (60) days from the date of issuance of this permit, this permit shall expire and the applicant will forfeit the permit fee paid for this permit, Whereupon the applicant must re -apply for a new permit. (The permit fee for the Bull Run development has been waived) b. In addition, this permit shall expire one year from the date of issuance. The applicant may apply for an extension by reapplication at least two weeks prior to the expiration date. Such application shall contain information sufficient to justify the granting of the extension. An extension may be granted for up to six months. 7. Building permits and certificates of occupancies will only be issued when all conditions contained in the Development Agreement and Sections 3.3.2(C) and (D)of the Land Use Code or Sections 29-678 and 29-679 of the Transitional Land Use Regulations, whichever is applicable, are met. If the Development Agreement does not specify times for completion of public improvements, or if there is no Development Agreement, then the improvement requirements specified in Section 24-95 of the City Code shall apply, which provides that construction of all improvements shall be required prior to the time of issuance of the first building permit . 8. Acceptance by the City of the public improvements shall be after (1) final inspection has been conducted by the City ; (2) punch list items from the final inspection are completed and accepted by the City; and (3) required certifications from the licensed professional engineer that improvements are completed to City standards, specifications and approved Utility Plans and the "as -constructed" plans have been received and accepted by the City. 9. The Developer shall submit to the City, a written guarantee for all completed improvements to be dedicated to the City, which guarantee shall be for a period of two (2) years after City acceptance of such improvements. No bond or other financial security shall be required. 10. The City Erosion Control Inspector must be notified at least twenty four (24) hours prior to any planned construction on this project. All required perimeter silt fencing and other erosion/sediment control best management practices (BMP's) that can be installed prior to construction must be in place and inspected by the City Erosion Control Inspector before any land disturbing activity begins. 11. The Developer shall provide and maintain a 20 ' wide fire lane. Said fire lane shall be visible, signed, and designed to withstand 35 tons of loading. Construction equipment will not block the fire lane under any circumstances. 12. The Developer agrees that an approved water supply system, including, but not limited to, fire hydrants, water lines, and water services will be installed and approved by the City before any aboveground construction begins. 2 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins DATE: 12 December, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 47-95C Waterrield P.U.D., First Filing-(LDGS) ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: December 10, 1997 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE UTILITY PLANS: Sheet No. 1 of 3: Final Plat • Clearly identify the location of the site on the vicinity map. • Please modify the Attorney's Certificate as shown on the enclosed attachment. • Modify the sheet numbering. Sheet No. 2 of 3: Final Plat • Some of the curve information is throughout the final plat. Please include. • Some of the curve information is throughout the final plat. Please include. comments continued on the next page r► Date: to Df ^ 1997 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: PLAT ® SITE ® UTILITY ® LANDSCAPE comments continued from the previous page... Sheet No. 3 of 3: Final Plat • Some of the curve information is throughout the final plat. Please include. • Please darken the easement line along Merganser and label properly. Sheet No. 16 of 45: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Please review the location of the storm sewer inlet at the intersection of Merganser Drive and Vine Drive to see if it is shown in the correct location. Please show the future curb return, gutter, and sidewalk along Vine Drive. • Reference the sheet number for the Vine Drive road improvements. • Depending on the various utility companies you may need to dedicate the 9 foot utility easement on Merganser Drive along the offsite portion of this project. • Please reference the detail for the 6 foot concrete pan at the entrance to the Bull Run Apartments. • Show and label the offsite grading easements along Merganser Drive. These will need to be dedicated by separate document. • Indicate where the transition on Merganser Drive begins and ends. Include stationing. • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • Please modify the slope of the cross pan. The minimum slope should be 0.6% per City standards. • Please see sheet number 16 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 17 of 45: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Please include the curve information in the curve tables for those curves that are missing. • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • Show and label the offsite grading easements along Merganser Drive. These will need to be dedicated by separate document. • Label the easements along Merganser Drive. • Reference the detail for the midblock access ramp. • Label and reference a detail for the concrete pan at the intersection of Merganser Drive and Garganey Drive. • Please see sheet number 17 for additional comments and concerns. comments continued on the next page 6* comments continued from the previous page... Sheet No. 18 of 45: Garganey Drive • If the pedestrian walk along Lot 13 is being constructed with this phase, you will need to dedicate a pedestrian access easement by separate document, or wait until the second filing and do it then. • Please try and move the midblock ramp in front of Lot 13 to a different location so that pedestrians ( including disabled pedestrians ) can cross the street without straddling the concrete pan. • Please reference a detail of the 12 foot concrete pan. Please label the easements along Garganey Drive. • Please reference a detail of the midblock ramp. • Please include the notes shown on this sheet on all street plan and profile sheets. • Grade and ground lines need to be extended for 500 feet beyond the proposed construction per City standards. • Please show the concrete pans in the flowline profiles as well. • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • For the area where the two 12 foot concrete pans are, we would like to see vertical curves. The elevations of the edges of the pans need to be a part of the vertical curve. Please modify the profiles accordingly and use Figure II in the street standards for doing so. • Please see sheet number 18 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 19 of 45: Brant, Black Scoter, and Bufflehead Ct. Plan and Profile Please show all PC's in the profiles with stations and elevations. • Please see sheet number 19 for additional comments and concerns Sheet No. 20 of 45: County Road #9E Plan and Profile • Please provide a station equation at the intersection of County Road #9E and Vine Drive. • Are there any driveway accesses for the school coming off of CR 9E? If so, please show the location of them. • Please show the manholes for the storm sewer along CR 9E. Will the manhole along the edge of the road need to be adjusted? You may want to include a note stating that the Manhole might need to be adjusted... just in case. • Please reduce the radii of the returns at the intersection of CR 9E and Vine Drive to 30 foot radii instead of 35 foot radii. Please include the notes from sheet number 18 on this sheet. comments continued on the next page k* comments continued from the previous page... • Please show the easements along CR 9E and label. • Please add note: "See sheet number 21 for typical cross section of CR 9F • Please show all of the pavement return profiles. • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • See sheet number 20 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 21 of 45: County Road #9E Plan and Profile • Please label the edge of asphalt and the proposed edge of asphalt. • It looks like you are showing some type of headwall for the proposed storm sewer within the roadway. This will need to be relocated. • Please modify the transition coming off of Garganey Drive. Extend the length of it to 150 feet. Refer to sheet number 21 for location. • Please reduce the curb return radii at the intersection of Garganey Drive and CR 9E to 20 feet instead of 30 feet. • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • Please include the notes from sheet number 18 on this sheet. • Please show the easements along CR 9E and label. • Grade and ground lines need to be extended for 1000 feet beyond the proposed construction per City standards. • Please modify the typical cross section. • See sheet number 21 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 22 of 45: County Road #9E Cross Sections • Please provide edge of asphalt elevations on all cross sections. • Please modify the sidewalk to 7 feet instead of 6 feet. • Please show all utility crossings with invert elevations, clearances, etc. On the appropriate cross sections. • See sheet number 22 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 23 of 45: County Road #9E Cross Sections • See sheet number 23 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 24 of 45: Vine Drive Plan and Profile • Please modify the intersection of Merganser. Drive aryd Vine Qrive.per,comments . on sheet numbers 16 and 25. comments continued on the next page wo comments continued from the previous page... • Please label where the tapers/transitions begin and end on Vine Drive. • Please add the cross sections indicated on sheet number 24 to the cross sections on sheet number 27. • Please show the future curb returns at the driveway access to the Bull Run Apartments. • Please provide the curve information in the table where shown. • The curb returns at the driveway access to the Bull Run Apartments need to be 15 feet. • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • Please include the notes from sheet number 18 on this sheet. • Please show the easements along Vine Drive and label. • Please include the note about the responsibility of the private improvements on this sheet. Refer to sheet number 16. • 1 would prefer to see spot elevations at the intersections as per details D-18 and D-19. • Please modify the vertical curves as shown on sheet number 24. • See sheet number 24 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 25 of 45: Vine Drive Plan and Profile • Please refer to sheet number 25 for comments regarding the intersection of Merganser Drive and Vine Drive. • I would prefer to see spot elevations at the intersections as per details D-18 and D-19. • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • Please include the notes from sheet number 18 on this sheet. • Please show the future crown/centerline of Vine Drive profile with the proposed centerline profile. • Please modify the vertical curves as shown on sheet number 25. • See sheet number 25 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 26 of 45: Vine Drive Plan and Profile • Please show all of the utility crossings in the profiles and include invert elevations, stationing, clearances, etc. • Please include the notes from sheet number 18 on this sheet. • Please show the easements along Vine Drive and label. • Provide or reference the typical cross section. • Please show the existing grade and ground lines along the flowlines for 1000 comments continued on the next page r► comments continued from the previous page... feet per City standards. • Please show the future crown/centerline of Vine Drive profile with the proposed centerline profile. • We need to see the ultimate design of Vine Drive as well as the interim. What is shown is existing conditions and doesn't qualify for an ultimate design. • If in fact The Sear -Brown Group is in fact doing a design for Vine Drive, please include the design in these plans to avoid conflicts. • See sheet number 26 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 27 of 45: Vine Drive Cross Sections • Please provide edge of asphalt elevations on all cross sections. • Please show all utility crossings with invert elevations, clearances, etc. On the appropriate cross sections. • See sheet number 27 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 28 of 45: Vine Drive Cross Sections • Please see the comments for sheet number 27. • Please provide cross sections for 1000 feet beyond the construction limit showing the ultimate design. Sheet No. 29 of 45: County Road #9E and Vine Drive Striping Plan • Modify the intersections per the comments stated above. }r � � C ., x 1, • $€C f F C r'�wr FF i DATE: July 31, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #7-95C Waterfield P.U.D., Phase I - (LDGS) Final PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, August 20, 1997 GENERAL COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE UTILITY PLANS: Sheet No. 16 of 35: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Need to show centerline profile through the intersection of Vine Drive per City standards. • is the stationing along the centerline or the flowline of the road? Please note. You will need to modify the transition of Merganser from a collector to a connector. Start the transition at around station 17+99.39 and taper both sides of the street. • See Sheet No. 16 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 17 of 35: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Recheck the profiles at the matchline. It appears as though they don't match (between sheet number 16 and 17). comments continued on the next page r► Date: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS x Plat x. Be _ Drainage Report y Ofber ;� Utily x Rein Uhhly Lands*TO �'""'�� City of Fort Collins comments continued from the previous page... By scaling off of the plans, it appears that the taper you are providing is too short. Check the offset and provide a 45:1 taper ratio. See Sheet No. 20 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 21 of 35: County Road 9E Plan and Profile • See comments on the previous sheet. • Construct the curb returns and handicap ramps in the ultimate locations as indicated. Provide asphalt to match the edge of asphalt on CR 9E. See plans. • Could you possibly modify the portion of CR 9E between stations 22+00.00 and 284-00.00 to reduce the amount of fill being proposed? Please take a look at it. If it won't work, include a description as to why it won't. • See Sheet No. 21 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 22 of 35: County Road 9E Cross -sections For all cross -sections: • Provide elevations at the locations indicated. • Provide cross slopes on channels/ditches. • Provide full cross -sections at the ultimate width. Show placement of sidewalks, curb and gutter, etc. We need to know that the crown of the road you are proposing will work with the rest of the features. You could probably show the ultimate design in hidden lines or a lighter line weight. • See Sheet No. 22 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 23 of 35: County Road 9E Cross -sections See Sheet No. 22 for comments and concerns. Sheet No. 24 of 35: Grading Plan It looks like there should be a culvert at the intersection of Garganey and CR 9E. Please check and make the appropriate modifications. Sheet No. 35 of 35: General Details Include detail no. D-25. comments continued from the previous page... • There should be sidewalk connections at the end of the cul-de-sacs. Please confirm this with Kathleen Reavis with the Transportation Planning Department. If so, the inlet will most likely need to be relocated to provide for a handicap access ramp. • You will need to show the profiles for 150' beyond per City standards. • Modify the typical cross -sections. • See Sheet No. 17 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 18 of 35: Garganey Drive Plan and Profile • Need to show grade and ground lines for 150' beyond the end of the construction (to the west of Garganey Drive) per City standards. • Provide centerline profile (on utility drawings) at the midblock crosspans per City standards. • Show all PC's in the profiles. • Is the stationing along the centerline or the flowline of the road? Please note. • Would like you to show the location of the 12' crosspans in the flowline profiles as well. • See Sheet No. 18 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 19 of 35: Brant, Black, Scoter, and Bufflehead Court Plan and Profile There should be sidewalk connections at the end of the cul-de-sacs. Please confirm this with Kathleen Reavis with the Transportation Planning Department. If so, the inlet will most likely need to be relocated to provide for a handicap access ramp. Is the stationing along the centerline or the flowline of the road? Please note. See Sheet No. 19 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet No. 20 of 35: County Road 9E Plan and Profile • We will need to see a design of the intersection of Vine Drive and County Road 9E (150' in all directions) per City standards. • is the stationing along the centerline or the flowline of the road? Please note. • Include a striping plan the next time you submit the utility plans. • Provide the preliminary design for the ultimate build out of County Road 9E. We need to know if the centerline you are proposing will work for both sides of the street. • Indicate where the centerline of the road is and whether or not that is the ultimate location. • Need to shove the centerline profile through the intersection of Vine Drive per City standards. • Need to show grade and ground lines for 1000' beyond the end of the construction per City standards. • Label all easements. comments continued on the next page r► J . n1a�bQ4li„ ff Current Planning Qualified Affordable Housing Project Comment Sheet DATE: June 24, 1997 DEPT: Engingeering PROJECT: #7-95C Waterfield PUD LDGS Final PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: July If 1997 ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) COMMENTS/CONCERNS NEEDED TO BE ADDRESSED FOR THE MAY P & Z HEARING • Merganser Drive needs to be a collector street with parking according to the traffic study. This has been a comment ever since the Waterfield project was submitted for preliminary. The current standards state that the minimum ROW dimension needs to be 76 feet. Please make the appropriate modifications to the plans as well as the Final Plat. See the redlined utility plans for the area where Merganser Drive will transition into a connector street. It appears as though the improvements to County Road 9E are extending past the property line to the north of the site. This is fine, however, you will need to obtain the appropriate easements to perform this construction. comments continued nn the next nape tar Date: GM HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECE[VE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat x See _ x Ugly � Ram �Y 2S —Oar Permittee's acknowledgment signature: By signing this permit I acknowledges that I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the property (including all owners having legal or equitable interest in the real property, as defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code; and including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application) without whose consent and authority the requested action could not lawfully be accomplished. Pursuant to said authority, I hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for purposes of inspection and, if necessary, to enter upon such property to perform work required of the applicant if the applicant were to fail to perform the required work. I also acknowledge that I have read this permit document with all its requirements and conditions, and I agree to all of the terms and conditions so stated in this permit. ApplicantlProject Manager's Signature: Dater Approval for issuance: /MC—Ity Engineer (Permit Issuance Date) comments continued from the previous page... The temporary road improvements that are being shown for County Road 9E show that the crown does not follow the centerline of the road. This may be because the centerline of the road does not follow the section line. It also appears that the road "meanders" along the section line. At this time these issues are not acceptable. Please make the necessary adjustments so that the improvements meet our standards. Staff will need to see letters of intent for all offsite easements related to this construction. See the utility plans for more specific comments concerning these issues. GENERAL COMMENTS: Sheet 1 of 35: Cover Sheet Add the appropriate changes to the General Notes as noted. Sheet 2 of 35: Overall Utility Plan • Refer to sheet number 2 for comments. Sheet 16 of 35: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • Per our continents in January, Merganser Drive (formally Wood Duck Drive) needs to be a collector street. Staff is requiring it to be a collector with parking from Vine Drive to the third street intersection. From this intersection, north to Garganey Drive, Merganser Drive needs to be a connector street. We would like to see the transition take place at the third intersection. • At the intersections of streets, you will need to add spot elevations per details D-18 and D-19. • You need to show a typical cross-section for the collector and connector portions of Merganser Drive reflecting the current standards. • Cur radii need to be adjusted in accordance with the street standards and the type of street. See utility plans for the affected curves. • Show all PC's in the profiles. • See sheet number 16 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 17 of 35: Merganser Drive Plan and Profile • You are missing a portion of the design for Merganser Drive. Please include in the next submittal. comments continued on the next page mr comments continued from the previous page,.. Sheet 18 of 35: Garganey Drive Plan and Profile • Need to show grade and ground lines for 150' beyond construction to the west of where Garganey Drive ends per City standards. • Provide centerline profile at mid -block crosspans per City standards. • Show concrete crosspans in the profiles with all of the appropriate information. • Show the PC's in the profiles. • Curb return radii are incorrect. Refer to the standards for the correct radii dimensions for the types of streets. • The typical cross-section needs to reflect the current standards. • See sheet number 18 for additional continents and concerns. Sheet 19 of 35: Brant, Black Scoter, and Bufflehead Court Plan and Profile • See sheet number 19 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 20 of 35: County Road 9E Plan and Profile • We will need to see a design of the Vine/Summitview intersection (150' in all directions) to see how the lanes, curb, gutter, sidewalk, etc. relate to each other. • Provide edge of asphalt profiles on each side of County Road 9E as well as the centerline profile. • See comment above about the crown on County Road 9E. • Need to show centerline profiles through intersections per City standards. • See sheet number 20 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 21 of 35: County Road 9E Plan and Profile • See comments on the previous sheet. • See comments above about the crown and easements on County Road 9E. See sheet number 21 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 22 of 35: County Road 9E Cross -sections • Items that need to be included on all of the cross -sections: i. The crown of the road needs to be along the centerline of the road. ii. Label the cross -slopes, ROW lines, slopes of the ditch, proposed and existing ground iii. It would be nice to see what the cross -sections will look like when the curb, gutter, sidewalk, etc. are built. Note: The above mentioned comments may raise other issues from other departments. These comments are from one perspective only and will need to be addressed in accordance with other departments comments and concerns. More comments will follow throughout the other submittals. E*Y#I R/T D BRISBEN COMPANIES resr i or 3 7800 F.AGT KEMRER Ii0A0 CINCINNATI. (DHIO 45249 (513) 489-1990 FAX (513) 489-2980 October 29, 1998 Mr. David Stringer Engineering, Department, City of Fort Collins 281 North CdlIege Fort Collins, C • 80522 Re: Waterfield Dear Dave: On September 24, 1998, a meeting was held at the City of Fort Collins to discuss the Waterfield PUD First Filing. Attending the meeting were John Gambini of Sycamore Construction, the general contractor for Bull Run Apartments, Kim Vowell of the Brisben Companies, the developer of Bull Run Apartments, Lucia Liley of March and Liley, attorney for the developer, James R. McCory of Colorado Land Source, Ltd., the developer of Waterfield PUD and David Stringer, representing the City of Fort Collins. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss and arrive at a solution to enable Brisben to develop the Bull Run Apartments in view of the fact that certain obligations of the overall PUD could not be met in a timely fashion, potentially forcing the apartment development's demise. The following represents our understanding of the agreements that were reached: The City agreed that it would immediately prepare a Development Agreement for all of Waterfield PUD Filing 1. This agreement would be prepared; however, with the understanding that the City will later approve two separate Development Agreements dividing improvements and obligations between the single family and multi -family developments Such amendment would relieve Brisben of certain of the overall PUD development requirements that are ultimately required upon development of the single family portion of the PUD. It was agreed that such action is necessitated so that Brisben's affordable housing effort is not overly encumbered by development costs and improvements not benefiting the apartment development. Brisben will riot have to construct County Road 9E adjacent to its property, however, the City will require that an escrow (at 125% of the cost of the improvement) guaranteeing the future construction of the road to full City standards be in place prior to issuance of the first C.O. The escrow amount will be for the ultimate build -out and will be just for that portion of County Road 9E that is adjacent to the multi -family. KEc.lorvnl. ORrICEs. 2525 P1 KTMLTLR PIACE DRIVF . SwTF 129 . NASNVILLE. TE, NP,ss:FE. 37214 (615) 889-1978 FAX (615) 889-3334 M00-I STIIART ANDPC,m Boul LVARD . CHARLOTTE, NORTIN CAROLINA 28217 (704) 523-4115 FAX (704) 523-4415 4891 INOc Pr:NDF.NCe 51RI(FT . SuiTL 149 . DEN,eR. CO, Do 80033 . (303) 421-9990 PAX (303) 432-6661 2325 N W. 33Ru SI'RrlT FT LAUDERDn LI FLORIUA 33309 . (954) 739. 0000 . FAX (954) 739 9563 4051 EXEC II'FIVE PARK DRIVE HARRIS11VRa, PLNNsr LVANIA 17111 . (717) 561-2555 . PAX (717) 561-2580 !X#/8/T D PACE 2 Of 3 Mr. Dave Stringer October 29, 1998 Page 2 • Brisben will construct a 36' paving lane and appurtenances on East Vine Drive from the intersection of County Road 9E to Merganser Drive, to include the intersection of Merganser Drive ("Interim Improvements"). The City will require an escrow or cash payment (at 125% of the cost of the improvement) for the ultimate build -out of East Vine Drive prior to the issuance of the first C.O., provided, however, that the cost of those portions of the Interim Improvements which will not need to be removed in order to build Vine Drive to full City standards will be deducted from the escrow amount and provided further that such escrow will include only that portion of Vine Drive adjacent to Bull Run and will not include the outparcels adjacent to Vine Drive. • Brisben will construct full -width pavement and appurtenances (water, sewer and storm) that serve and benefit the apartments on the west side of the apartment development. The paving, sanitary sewer and water line designed to continue north on Merganser Drive (serving the single family) will be terminated and plugged at the north property line of the multi -family parcel (approximately Sta. 19+74). • Brisbet1�will construct all downstream sanitary sewer and stormwater facilities in -0.yt> VlnAA Win front of the future apartments and in Merganser Road (up to Sta. 19 �74) necessary to serve the apartment project. The stormwater improvements shall include excavation of the entire detention pond facility and installation of the outfall structure (Storm Line L). Brisben will install within the pond only the east -west concrete trickle channel that serves the upstream apartment improvements. The remainder of the trickle channel (the north -south channel) within the pond will be constructed by the single-family development (Filing 1, Phase 2 of Waterfield PUD) prior to the issuance of any building permits for such single-family development. • Brisben will construct the 24" irrigation line within the apartment development property and partially across County Road 9E where it will connect to the existing 18" irrigation pipe. The 24" line will be terminated and be plugged at the apartment property line. • Bull Run PUD will have no responsibility for the construction and/or escrowing of funds for off -site street improvements. Such improvements shall be the responsibility g of the single-family development (Filing 1, Phase 2 of Waterfield PUD), provided N'3 that the developer of Filing 1, Phase 2 shall have the option of escrowing 125% of th6 � 5 cost of such off -site street improvements in lieu of construction. i : ` ate, posted with the City, compiletsd prior to the issuance of, --} the first certificate of occupancy. F.Y.. /8/T D PACE OF Mr. Dave Stringer October 29, 1998 Page 3 If the above accurately represents our agreement, please indicate by signing below. Sincerely, E. Scott McFadden Director of Development Western Region Read and Approved this 2N1 day ofjt,ay,,,6�,, 1998. BY�.� David �Stringer 0 M Ij sJJ e C„ '�\ \ END SIDEWALK —� —ASPHALT TAPERS If j I i i I J Old i 3 �� LL w, W 17 IC ------------ _ t� ii•'� ,i „4 y� r�� iMq -'*n. {-"*'i i i M gas. It EASE' V DFdY� 6 F_ ^� Q _N[) 'r I+APRJIE IUFN ?AV1Nti f*1 �� �:317dVi 1lMid ,N 'T1 =_J4\ i N �•� 9 c S3NblC)OI c. 9f aL wdO ANIA - rd UIM - r 3ARIG aMA XGW3 ; / I NOLLX liNW d0 sarin co r I m / ' I ,i ff �! 1 'i -- i i i i --- iI Transpe tion Services Engineering Department City of Fort Collins Northern Engineering Services, Inc. Mr. Roger Curtis, P.E. 420 South Howes, Suite 202 Fort Collins, Co. 80521 RE: Waterfield 1" Filing stormwater revisions Dear Mr. Curtis: This letter is in response to your request to eliminate the stormwater drainage pipe from approximately Station 14+14.22 to Station 15+81-31, and to replace it with an open channel. After reviewing your proposed revision to the storm drainage line and talking with the City's Transportation Planner and City Engineer, it has been determined that it is not in the Citv's best interest to approve this revision. The elimination of this pipe system causes the City concern as it relates to the future expansion of Vine Drive. In the future roadway section, this proposed stormwater conveyance will need to be piped. This pipe system must be installed now with the Waterfield development and its required improvements along the Vine Street frontage. In addition, there is concern that an open channel might give the adjacent property owners and/or residents the misconception that there will be a physical separation from the future roadway, thinking the channel will always remain as a buffer area. 1 am sorry that we can not approve your request for this revision. If you have any questions please call me at 221-6605. Sincerely David Stringer, Development Re w Supervisor Cc: Cam McNair, City Engineer Basil Hamelin, Stormwater Engineer John Daggett, Transportation Planner 281 North Culle,e Avenue • P.O. Box SRO • Fort Collins, CO S03"_Ih O • (970) 221-660b City of Fort Collins TO: VIA: FROM: DATE: RE: Transpor}-tion Services Engineering Department City Manager, John Fischbach Transportation Service Area Director, Ron Phillips Transportation Operations Director, Gary Diede City Engineer, Cam McNair March 24, 1999 Administrative Fees in the "Choice Streets' Ordinances This is intended to modify and replace the memo dated November 23, 1998, of the same subject. Incorporated within the "Choice Streets' program, Ordinances No. 177, 1998, through 183, 1998, are a number of administrative fees which are set by the City Manager pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 7.5, Article I of the City Code. The purpose of this memo is to gain the City Manager's explicit approval for these fees, which took effect on January 1, 1999. In future years, these fees will be included as part of the budget approval process. The City Council recognized and approved these fee schedules on October 20, 1998, at the second reading of the Choice Streets ordinances. The administrative fees requiring City Manager approval are as follows: 1. Development Constriction Permit a. Permit Fee for most new projects = $300.00. b. Permit Fee for small projects (public improvements of $20,000 or less) = $150.00. c. Permit Extension = $100.00. 2. Construction Inspection Fees a. Trench Excavations = $60.00 for the first 100 linear feet or portion thereof, plus $0.60 per linear foot over 100. b. Pipeline Installations = $60.00 for the first 100 linear feet or portion thereof, plus $0.60 per linear foot over 100. 281 North College Avenue • PC. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6605 Page 2 Administrative Fees in the 'Choice Streets" Ordinances March 24, 1999 c. Sidewalks, Trails, and Curb -and -Gutter Installations = $60.00 for the first 50 linear feet or any portion thereof, plus $0.80 per linear foot over 50. d. Pavement (Concrete or Asphalt) _ $90.00 for the first 300 square yards or any portion thereof, plus $0.30 per square yard over 300. e. Retaining Walls, Box Culverts, Inlets and Other Structures (Structural Concrete, Masonry, or Stone) _ $3.00 per cubic yard, with a minimum fee of $75.00. f. Appurtenances: Manhole = $90.00 each Fire Hydrant = $60.00 each Valve and Box = $60.00 each Fitting = $30.00 each Inlet = $90.00 each Service Line Stub = $60.00 each 3. Right -of -Way Contractors License Fee a. Application Fee = $25.00 per license application. b. License Fee = $75.00 per license issued. 4. Street Cut Fee a. Application Fee = $25.00 per permit. b. Inspection Fee = $45.00 per 1,000 square feet of excavation, or portion thereof c. Note that there is also a Pavement Impact Fee, which is a third component of the Street Cut Fee. The Pavement Impact Fee is established by Ordinance No. 181, 1998, and it is published in Chapter 7.5, Article IV, of the City Code. The Pavement Impact Fee is not an administrative fee set by the City Manager. 5. Affordable Housi nia Exemption. Affordable housing projects shall be totally or partially exempt from the fees authorized in this memorandum according to the following criteria: a. The fees shall be entirely waived for development projects in which at least fifty-one (51) percent of the dwelling units are available for rent or purchase on terms which would be affordable to individuals earning eighty (80) percent or less of the median income of city EXHIBIT "A" DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONTACT PERSONS Project Name: Waterfield PUD, First Filing — Bull Run Apartments City Staff Contact Persons: Development Engineer: Tim Blandford, City of Fort Collins, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80522 970/221.6605 ext. 7128 Construction Inspector: Dave Burke, City of Fort Collins, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80522 970/217, 8901 Current Planner: Steve Olt, City of Fort Collins, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80522 970/221.6750 ext. 6341 Water Utilities Engineer: Roger Buffington, 700 Wood Street, Fort Collins, CO 80521 970/221.6854 Stormwater Engineer: Jay Barber, 700 Wood Street, City of Fort Collins, CO 80521 970/221.6063 Erosion Control Inspector: Bob Zakely, 700 Wood Street, City of Fort Collins, CO 80521 970/221.6063 Natural Resources: Kim Kreimeyer, City of Fort Collins, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80522 970/221.6750 ext. 6641 Traffic Operations: Ward Stanford, 700 Wood Street, City of Fort Collins, CO 80521 970/221.6820 Street closures: N/A Transportation Planning: Kathleen Reavis, 210 East Olive Street, City of Fort Collins, CO 80524 970/224.6140 Forestry: Tim Buchanan, City of Fort Collins, 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80522 970/221.6361 Page 3 Administrative Fees in the 'Choice Streets"Ordinances March 24, 1999 residents, as adjusted for family size, and paying less than thirty (30) percent of their gross income for housing, including utilities. b. The fees shall be reduced by one-half ('/z) if at least fifty-one (51) percent of the dwelling units within the project are available for rent or purchase on terms which would be affordable to individuals earning more than eighty (80) percent but less than ninety-five (95) percent of the median income of city residents, as adjusted for family size, and paying less than thirty (30) percent of their gross income for housing, including utilities. c. In order to determine whether a development project is eligible for a total or partial waiver of fees under these criteria, any applicant seeking such total or partial waiver must submit documentation evidencing the eligibility of the development project to the City Engineer, who may, upon review of such documentation, defer the payment of said fees to such time, if at all, that a certificate of completion is sought for the development project. At that time, prior to the issuance of any certificate of completion for the development project, a final determination shall be made by the City Engineer as to whether the development project qualifies for a total or partial waiver of the fees. In the event that the City Engineer determines that the development project does not so qualify, all such fees shall be due and payable prior to the issuance of the certificate of completion and acceptance for the development. The foregoing fees are hereby established this _day of 1999, nunc pro tunc January 1, 1999. John Fischbach, City Manager i : 01 • 1 • 1 7800 EAST KEMPER ROAD CINCINNATI. OHIO 45249 (513)489-1990 FAX (513) 489-2780 October 29, 1998 Mr. David Stringer Engineering Department, City of Fort Collins 281 North College Fort Collins, CO 80522 Re: Waterfield PUD Dear Dave: On September 24, 1998, a meeting was held at the City of Fort Collins to discuss the Waterfield PUD First Filing. Attending the meeting were John Gambini of Sycamore Construction, the general contractor for Bull Run Apartments, Kim Vowell of the Brisben Companies, the developer of Bull Run Apartments, Lucia Liley of March and Liley, attorney for the developer, James R. McCory of Colorado Land Source, Ltd., the developer of Waterfield PUD and David Stringer, representing the City of Fort Collins. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss and arrive at a solution to enable Brisben to develop the Bull Run Apartments in view of the fact that certain obligations of the overall PUD could not be met in a timely fashion, potentially forcing the apartment development's demise. The following represents our understanding of the agreements that were reached: The City agreed that it would immediately prepare a Development Agreement for all of Waterfield PUD Filing 1. This agreement would be prepared; however, with the understanding that the City will later approve two separate Development Agreements dividing improvements and obligations between the single family and multi -family developments. Such amendment would relieve Brisben of certain of the overall PUD development requirements that are ultimately required upon development of the single family ;portion of the PUD. It was agreed that such action is necessitated so that Brisben's affordable housing effort is not overly encumbered by development costs and improvements not benefiting the apartment development. Brisben will not have to construct County Road 9E adjacent to its property; however, the City will require that an escrow (at 125% of the cost of the improvement) guaranteeing the future construction of the road to full City standards be in place prior to issuance of the first C.O. The escrow amount will be for the ultimate build -out and will be just for that portion of County Road 9E that is adjacent to the multi -family. REGIONAL OFFICES: 2525 PERIMETER PLACE DRIVE . SUITE 129 . NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE 37214 (615) 889-1978 FAX (615) 889-3334 4400-1 STUART ANOREV/ BOULEVARD . CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 28217 - (704) 523-4115 - FAX (704) 523-4415 4891 INDEPENDENCE STREET . SUITE 149 . DENVER. COLORADO 80033 . (303) 421-9990 . FAX (303) 432-15661 2325 N. W. 33RD STREET FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORID. 33309 . (954) 739-0000 - FAX (954) 739-7563 4051 EXECUTIVE PARK DRIVE HARRISBURG. PENNSYLVANIA 17111 . (717) 561-2555 - FAX (717) 5151-2580 Mr. Dave Stringer October 29, 1998 Page 2 Brisben will construct a 36' paving lane and appurtenances on East Vine Drive -from the intersection of County Road 9E to Merganser Drive, to include the intersection of Merganser Drive ("Interim Improvements"). The City will require an escrow or cash payment (at 125% of the cost of the improvement) for the ultimate build -out of East Vine Drive prior to the issuance of the first C.O., provided, however, that the cost of those portions of the Interim Improvements which will not need to be removed in order to build Vine Drive to full City standards will be deducted from the escrow amount and provided further that such escrow will include only that portion of Vine Drive adjacent to Bull Run and will not include the outparcels adjacent to Vine Drive. Brisben will construct full -width pavement and appurtenances (water, sewer and storm) that serve and benefit the apar4ments on the west side of the apartment development. The paving, sanitary sewer and water line designed to continue north on Merganser Drive (serving the single family) will be terminated and plugged at the north property line of the multi -family parcel (approximately Sta. 19+74). • BristerLwill construct all downstream sanitary sewer and stormwater facilities in Vine n*i front of the future apartments and in Merganser Road (up to Sta. 19+74) necessary to serve the apartment project. The stormwater improvements shall include excavation of the entire detention pond facility and installation of the outfall structure (Storm Line L). Brisben will install within the pond only the east -west concrete trickle channel that serves the upstream apartment improvements. The remainder of the trickle channel (the north -south channel) within the pond will be constructed by the single-family development (Filing 1, Phase 2 of Waterfield PUD) prior to the issuance of any building permits for such single-family development. Brisben will construct the 24" irrigation line within the apartment development property and partially across County Road 9E where it will connect to the existing 18" irrigation pipe. The 24" line will be terminated and be plugged at the apartment property line. Bull Run PUD will have no responsibility for the construction and/or escrowing of funds for off -site street improvements. Such improvements shall be the responsibility of the single-family development (Filing 1, Phase 2 of Waterfield PUD), provided that the developer of Filing 1, Phase 2 shall have the option of escrowing 125% of the cost of such off -site street improvements in lieu of construction. If an escrow is posted with the City, such improvements must be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Mr. Dave Stringer October 29, 1998 Page 3 If the above ac?,urately represents our agreement, please indicate by signing below. Sincerely, /� 2 cS ott Me,B/adden Director of Development Western Region Read and Approved this 2u1 day o4l;tt„�t 1998. BytDavid Stringer BRISBE.N COMPANIES 9800 EAST KHm F,F 1e RLIAD CINCINNATI, Omo 45249 (513) 489-1990 FAX (513) 489 27/ O COMMUNICATION VIA FAX Tim Blanford Fort Collins Engineering Department P. O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Re: Bull Run DovelnnmPnt Agreement Dear Tim: May 12, 1998 I am writing to inquire about the status of the Bull Run Development Agreement. As you indicated almost two weeks ago at our meeting to discuss off -site drainage, the Bull Run Development Agreement was to have been complete this week. As you know, we are extremely close to obtaining final plan approval, and do not want to be delayed in waiting for the Development Agreement to be written only after the engineering plans receive final approval. The final details of the off -site drainage issue should not affect the language contained in the Development Agreement. Please call me at (303) 299-9310 to let me know what day we can expect to receive the Development Agreement for our review. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Cordialillv Brock R. C apman :l'cs!-(O Regiuu cc: Scott McFadden Lucia Liley Bud Curtiss Recto NAL Owaces 2525 Pt uIM[ TER P1.1ce DRNIa . SUITR 129 NASHviu e, TeNNLssea 39214 (615) 889-1998 FAX (615) 889 -3334 4400-1 STIJARr AiJDRI:W B()u1. L. vApt . CHARLOTTr, NORTH C.AROLINA 28217 (704) 523 -4115 FAX (704) 513-4415 489[ 1N11R RI. NO11 N11: S'r.lIT . SVITF 149 - DeNv¢a. Col oRAo. 80033 . (303) 421 -9990 FAX (303) 432-8661 2325 N W. 33RD STI eeEl . ri 1.AVDFRDALE, FLORI[>A 33309 . (954) 939-0000 FAX (954) 939-9563 4051 EXE1-IIT'11 1".. DRwe I-1 nR Rlsuo Re, PIe NNst LVANIA I /I I I . (719) 561 2555 - FAX (719) 561-2580 Light and Power: Doug Martine, 700 Wood Street, City of Fort Collins, CO 80521 970/224.6152 Developer's Contact Persons: Project Manager: Jeff Hiser, Sycamore Construction, Ltd., 4891 Independence, Suite 149, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303/421.9990, ext. 108 Mobile: 303/884.1034 fax: 303/432.8661 Developer: Kim Vowell/Jeff Hiser, Brisben Development, 4891 Independence, Suite 277, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303/407.2992 Mobile: 303/475.3358 fax: 303/421.2161 Owner(s): Kim Vowell, Bull Run Limited Partnership, 7800 East Kemper Road, Cincinnati, OH 45249 Office: 303/407.2992 Mobile: 303/475.3358 fax: 303/421.2161 Architect/Planner: Linda Ripley, VF Ripley Associates, Inc., 1113 Stoney Hill Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Office: 970/4.5628 Project Engineer: Roger (Bud) Curtiss, P.E., Northern Engineering Services, Inc., 420 South Howes Street, Fort Collins, CO 80521 Office: 970/221.4158 fax: 970/221.4159 General Contractor: Jeff Hiser, Sycamore Construction, Ltd., 4891 Independence, Suite 149, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303/421.9990, ext. 108 Mobile: 303/884.1034 fax: 303/432.8661 Outside Contact Persons: U.S. West Tim Weaver, 124 W. Magnolia, Fort Collins, CO 80521 970/224.7473 TCI of Fort Collins Dennis Greenwalt, 1201 University Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 970/226.3104 Public Service Company Jim Slagle, 1901 East Horsetooth Road, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970/225.7843 Poudre Fire Authority Ron Gonzales, 102 Remington Street, Fort Collins, CO 80524 970/221.6570 Boxelder Sanitation Brent Harris, 2217 Airway Avenue, #3, Fort Collins, CO 80524 970/498.0604 ELCO Chuck Hannak, 232 Link Lane, Fort Collins, CO 80524 970/493.2044 Lake Canal Company Don Magnuson, 33040 Railroad, Lucerne, CO 970/352.0222 3 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: April 10, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Waterfield P.U.D. PLANNER: Mike Ludwig COMMENTS/CONCERNS NEEDED TO BE ADDRESSED FOR THE MAY P & 7 HEARING • Conifer will need to be extended through to County Road 9E (CR 9E). This means that the road will have to cross the ditch. • Street classifications do not match the required volumes from the "Long Range Daily Link Volumes" report prepared by Matt Delich, P.E. This was a previous comment. • Because of the extension of Conifer Street and the reclassifications of certain streets, it seems as though the site plan will be affected significantly and will require modification. Please provide us with drawings reflecting these changes. • With the future grade separation at East Vine Drive and CR 9E, some of the structures will be affected. Please relocate the affected structures including walks, ponds, buildings, etc. in accordance with the criteria given to Northern Engineering Services. These include: south bound ramp to west bound Summit View. ii. assume a 3:1 for overpass embankment. • All properties affected by offsite improvements and future improvements need to be notified and need to submit letters stating their awareness. • County Road 11 (CR 11) needs to be extended to the property line. • Need to name CR 11 and CR 9E from an approved name list. • Provide schematic drawings of future grade separation from Northern Engineering Services. comments continued on the next page cw Date: s- a --n 1 Signature: comments continued from the previous page... Note: The above mentioned comments may raise other issues from other departments. These comments are from one perspective only and will need to be addressed in accordance with other departments comments and concerns. GENERAL COMMENTS: Sheet I of 5: • Make sure that all of the horizontal radii for the streets meet the current street standards. • You will need to improve CR 9E to the northern -most property line. (full street width improvements) • The typical single family lot detail does not apply to all of the single family lots. Please remove or provide a detail of all single family lot configurations. Sheet 2 of 5: • The nose of some of the medians are too close to their intersecting streets. Medians have to be a minimum of 20' from the flowline of the intersecting street per the current street standards. • The school drop-off area needs to meet the current standards for a bus drop-off. • We would like to see a detail of what the traffic circle will look like. Include necessary dimensions. • Some of the parking spaces within the parking areas may be too close to the public streets. The parking stalls need to be a minimum of 50' from the travel lane of the adjacent street per the current street standards. Sheet 3 of 5: • Please address the concerns from the City of Fort Collins which are attached to these redlined plans. • Provide sidewalk connections off of the end of the cul-de-sacs per the current street standards. Need to show CR 11 to the property line. Note: Refer to the redlined plans for more comments and concerns. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS We would prefer not to see the grade separation and the ultimate improvements to Vine Drive and Summitview on the plans that will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board. We will, however, want to see this information on the utility plans which are submitted to the City for final review. comments continued on the next page aw comments continued from the previous page... You will need to escrow money for the connection of County Road 11 ( CR11 ) to the north and Conifer Street to the east. Once the City gets a better idea of what will be developed north of Waterfield, the money that has been escrowed will be used to complete the construction of these roads. The reason for the connection of CRl1 to the north and Conifer to the east is that the City wants the streets to resemble a street network as close as possible.