The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPARK SOUTH COMMERCIAL PLAZA FOURTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-08-03Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments wmmw�_ Department: Engineering Date: January 5, 2004 Project: PARK SOUTH COMMERCIAL PLAZA, 2ND FLG LOT 2B, VALVOLINE OIL CHANGE -TYPE I All comments must: be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 07, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 Reading the conceptual review letter sent to the applicant by Current Planning, then reading conceptual review comments in the Engineering file, it appears that engineering was mis-quoted in the letter sent to the applicant. That letter stated that: "Development of this property will have to dedicate necessary additional street right-of-way (ROW) and easements behind the ROW for West Horsetooth Road. There currently is 50' of right-of-way (south of the centerline of the street) and 57.5' is ultimately required." Engineering's file comments state that the existing ROW on Horsetooth is 50' plus 12' for the right turn lane, and 7.5' of additional ROW is needed, and that the utility easement should be a total of 15' beyond the new ROW. The additional 7.5' of ROW is still required, as is the 15' utility easement behind that. Number: 12 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 On the landscape plan, please be sure to show existing features in a ghosted or alternate -weight line lie curb and gutter in the movie theatre parking lot). Number: 13 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 Please show phasing clearly, and match the utility plans to the site and landscape plan phasing. (Required for Final Compliance). Number: 16 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 Please see reclined plans and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 14 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 Overall utility plan: please label the easement types. Number: 15 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 Grading plan: It appears that some grading and curb and gutter work will be done on the movie theatre property. Please obtain easements from the property owner for this work. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _� Site Drainage Report Other Utility _� Redline Utility / Landscape Page 1 mmwdmmww�_ Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: January 8, 2004 Project: PARK SOUTH COMMERCIAL PLAZA, 2ND FLG LOT 2B, VALVOLINE OIL CHANGE -TYPE I All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 07, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 12/30/2003 [12/30/031 Reading the conceptual review letter sent to the applicant by Current Planning, then reading conceptual review comments in the Engineering file, it appears that engineering was mis-quoted in the letter sent to the applicant. That letter stated that: "Development of this property will have to dedicate necessary additional street right-of-way (ROW) and easements behind the ROW for West Horsetooth Road. There currently is 50' of right-of-way (south of the centerline of the street) and 57.5' is ultimately required." Engineering's file comments state that the existing ROW on Horsetooth is 50' plus 12' for the right turn lane, and 7.5' of additional ROW is needed, and that the utility easement should be a total of 15' beyond the new RC W. The additional 7.5} of ROW is still required, as is the 1 5' utility easement behind that. * * 1.8.03 - Following a meeting of the Transportation Coordination group this morning, it was agreed that the City would be willing to accept ROW cledication to the back of the existing sidewalk, approximately 4' as shown on the plans, in lieu of the standard 7.5' ROW. Please note this as an approved variance on the utility plans. Variance of the utility easement width would need to meet the approval of possibly affected utilities. If a narrower utility easement is requested, please submit an 8 1 /2 x I I sketch of the area showing the proposed utility easement, and I will route it to the appropriate utilities for their approval. The utilities are given 2 weeks to respond to these requests. Number: 12 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 121301031 On the landscape plan, please be sure to show existing features in a ghosted or alternate -weight line Ile curb and gutter in the movie theatre parking lot). Number: 13 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 Please show phasing clearly, and match the utility plans to the site and landscape plan phasing. (Required for Final Compliance). Number: 16 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/031 Please see reclined plans and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 14 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/03J Overall utility plan: please label the easement types. Number. 15 Created: 12/30/2003 [ 12/30/03] Grading plan: It appears that some grading and curb and gutter work will be done on the movie theatre property. Please obtain easements from the property owner for this work. &_,I� a� 1 1, 0 _L— .Signatare Date CHECK HERE. IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Re ort nth P er Utility —/ Redline Utility ✓ Landscape Page I Project Comments Sheet bil C itj= of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: Nlay 21, 2004 Project: PARK SOUTH COMMERCIAL PLAZA, 2ND FLG LOT 213, HORSETOOTH CARWASIH-TYPE All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: May 19, 2004 Mote - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 12/30/2003 [4/30/04) Clearly label and dimension the proposed ROW for Horsetooth and the utility easement behind it on the site and landscape plans. Also, please work with XCEL/PSCO to address their concerns with the building placement in relation to their gas line in the utility easement on Horsetooth. Comment from Jim DeWilde: "PSCO has an existing 4" PED gas main laying 12' into the existing 15' U.E. PSCO needs min. 3' clearance from gas main to proposed building wall. Any relocation of main would be at developer's expense." [12/30/03] Reading the conceptual review letter sent to the applicant by Current Planning, then reading conceptual review comments in the Engineering file, it appears that engineering was mis-quoted in the letter sent to the applicant. That letter stated that: "Development of this property will have to dedicate necessary additional street right-of-way (ROW) and easements behind the ROW for West Horsetooth Road. There currently is 50' of right-of-way (south of the centerline of the street) and 57.5' is ultimately required." Engineering's file comments state that the existing ROW on Horsetooth is 50' plus 12' for the right turn lane, and T5' of additional ROW is needed, and that the utility easement should be a total of 15' beyond the new ROW. The additional 7-9 of ROW is still required, as is the 15' utility easement behind that. 1.8.03 - Following a meeting of the Transportation Coordination group this morning, it was agreed that the City would be willing to accept ROW dedication to the back of the existing sidewalk, approximately 4' as shown on the plans, in lieu of the standard 7.5' ROW. Please note this as an approved variance on the utility plans. Variance Df the utility easement width would need to meet the approval of possibly affected utilities. If a narrower utility easement is requested, please submit an 8 1/2 x 11 sketch of the area showing the proposed utility easement, and I will route It to the appropriate utilities for their approval The utilities are given 2 weeks to respond to these requests_ Number: 13 Created. 12/30!2003 1413Qr04j Repeat. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 12, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #37-94E — Park South Commercial Plaza, 2nd Filing, Lot 2B, Horsetooth Carwash — Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: December 1, 2004 ❑ No Comment ElProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** Name (please print) Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Citv of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet (06"� 1 Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: November 16, 2004 Project: PARK SOUTH COMMERCIAL PLAZA, 2ND FLG LOT 213, HORSETOOTH CARWASH-TYPE I All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: December 01, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 12/30/2003 [11/16/04] Has the PSCO issue been resolved? See below. [4/30/04] Clearly label and dimension the proposed ROW for Horsetooth and the utility easement behind it or, the site and landscape plans. Also, please work with XCEUPSCO to address their concerns with the building placement in relation to their gas line in the utility easement on Horsetooth. Comment from Jim DeWilde: "PSCO has an existing 4" PED gas main laying 12' into the existing 15' U.E. PSCO needs min. 3' clearance from gas main to proposed building wall. Any relocation of main would be at developer's expense." [12/30/03] Reading the conceptual review letter sent to the applicant by Current Planning, then reading conceptual review comments in the Engineering file, it appears that engineering was mis-quoted in the letter sent to the applicant. That letter stated that: "Development of this property will have to dedicate necessary additional street right-of-way (ROW) and easements behind the ROW for West Horsetooth Road. There currently is 50' of right-of-way (south of the centerline of the street) and 57.5' is ultimately required." Engineering's file comments state that the existing ROW on Horsetooth is 50' plus 12' for the right turn lane, and 7.6 of additional ROW is needed, and that the utility easement should be a total of 15' beyond the new ROW. The additional 7.5' of ROW is still required, as is the 15' utility easement behind that. 1.8.03 - Following a meeting of the Transportation Coordination group this morning, it was agreed that the City would be willing to accept ROW dedication to the back of the existing sidewalk, approximately 4' as shown on the plans, in lieu of the standard 7.5' ROW. Please note this as an approved variance on the utility plans. Variance of the utility easement width 3r1 , Z �. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 would need to meet the approval of possibly affected utilities. If a narrower utility easement is requested, please submit an 8 1/2 x 11 sketch of the area showing the proposed utility easement, and I will route it to the appropriate utilities for their approval. The utilities are given 2 weeks to respond to these requests. Number: 13 Created: 12/30/2003 [11/16/04] [4/30/04] Repeat: [12/30/031 Please show phasing clearly, and match the utility plans to the site and landscape plan phasing. (Required for Final Compliance). Number: 16 Created: 12/30/2003 [11/16/04] No utility plan checklist was resubmitted. [4/30/04] Repeat: [12/30/03) Please see: redlined plans and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. Number: 48 Created: 4/30/2004 [11/16/04] A note was added to the utility plans, but not to the site/landscape plans. Also, the overhang was shown outside of the easement on the site plan, but not on the utility plans. Please coordinate. [4/30/04] Building envelopes/outlines are not allowed over utility easements. Overhangs extending no farther than 2.5' into the utility easement are permissible. If this is an overhang, please clearly label it as such. Number: 49 Created: 5/4/2004 [11/16/04] It is still unclear how the emergency access easement for the fire lane will be connected to another EAE or public street ROW, as needed. Also, it is unclear whether the radii used for the curves on the EAE meet the LUC requirement: 25' interior radius and 50' exterior radius (same centerpoint). [5/4/04] A fire lane is shown on the plans, but is shown only as a 'u' and isn't shown to connect to another fire lane or street. Usually an emergency access easement is required to be dedicated for fire lanes, and the EAE would connect to a public ROW or another EAE. Please work with PFA., and if they require an easement, please show it on all plans and provide a legal, sketch, and deed of dedication using the City's standard language. Please contact me if you need a copy of this language. Number: 50 Created: 5/4/2004 [11/16/04] The utility plan title needs to be revised - it says 3rd filing. [5/4/04] Please match the titles on the plans; some say Lot 2-B Park South, but the utility plan says park south commercial plaza minor subdivision 2nd filing, lot 2-b. In the City's system, it is Park South Commercial Plaza, 2nd Filing, Lot 2B, Horsetooth Carwash. Number: 114 Created: 11/16/2004 [11/16/04] Please review all plans for scanability and revise as necessary. LCUASS appendix E-6 explains scanning requirements. Topic: Transportation Number: 98 [11/16/041 Page 2 Created: 5/21 /2004 [5/21/04] Comment inserted for Tom Reiff: [5/19/04] Currently the retail building identified in Phase II is not in compliance with the connecting walkway standard. A follow-u1pp�,,meeting is requested to discuss a couple of options regarding the layout of the building. ( 041-i Ca,{tiain hLC60 Number: 99 Created: 5/21/2004 [11 /16/04] [5/21/04] Comment inserted for Tom Reiff: (5/19/04] Why is there a crosswalk that leads from the car wash to the trash enclosure for Auto Zone? Is it intended to connect to the Auto Zone parking lot? S AA,e-c� oC'�i lG eSIM� - `'I'j [ o rtte¢ flit e t ^' +-j -too Page 3 City of Fort Collins Current Planning FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET MAR 0 8 2005 DATE: March 7, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #97-34F Park South Commercial Plaza, Lot 2B, Horsetooth Carwash, 2nd Filing, Type I, Final Compliance All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: March 23, 2005 � tyk Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems s[�Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) gou,✓pAeY -e1-f6.4COSE, �Gccss ? /Vo �Ci�Z6 Gry� o, iti'l f9GCESJJi�/i75Q�j _,4,3 _� �6 c x.��1T ON . 56u it t-I f t O e' Name (please rint) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS J/Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: March 16, 2005 Project: PARK SOUTH COMMERCIAL PLAZA, 2ND FLG LOT 2B, HORSETOOTH CARWASH-TYPE I/FC All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: March 23, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 13 Created: 12/30/2003 13/16/05] Grading phasing shown, but it doesn't include the utilites. Please show phasing for utilities. [11/16104] [4/30/04] Repeat: [12/30/03] Please show phasing clearly, and match the utility plans to the site and landscape plan phasing. (Required for Final Compliance). Number: 16 Created: 12/30/2003 [3/16/05] [11/16/04] No utility plan checklist was resubmitted. [4/30/04] Repeat: 112/30/03] Please see redlined plans and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. Number: 114 Created: 11 /16/2004 13/16/051 111/16/04] Please review all plans for scanability and revise as necessary. LCUASS appendix E-6 explains scanning requirements. Number: 135 Created: 3/16/2005 [3/16/05] Redlines for plat and landscape plan were not received. Please remember to resubmit all redlines. Number: 136 Created: 3/16/2005 [3/16/p5] Plat is missing a paragraph, and has several typos. Signature 3, 25.05 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ ✓ Site Drainage Report Other Utility _� Redline Utility Landscape Page 1