HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTETSON CREEK PUD FIFTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-07-14PROJECT
i.� COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: March 8, 1999 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #16-89L Steston Creek, 5" Filing (Townhomes)
— Type I (LUC) - Final
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, March 17, 1999
Stetson Creek 51' filing (page 1 of 2)
March 16, 1999
• Change the cross section of Madison Creek Drive back to the way it has been shown
through out the review process. Attached sidewalk does not meet the standards,
provide detached sidewalk along here as was previously shown.
• The Plat and utility plans call the northern drive Alder Creek Drive the site plans calls it
Copper Creek Drive. Which is correct? Make sure all documents match.
Site Plan
• Shows the temporary turn around configuration incorrectly.
Plat
• Attached is new plat language that needs to be used.
• Add note 10 indicating who will own and maintain Tract I.
• Need to provide solid lines to identify the boundaries between the Tracts -just like the lot
lines.
• Some of the easements adjacent to the row are labeled as general utility and access
easements, some are labeled as general utility easements and some are not labeled. What
kind of easement are the ones not labeled?
(Continued on next page)
Date: 3 Signature: C§
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECENE COPIES OF REVISIONS 00
Pit Site _ Drainage Report _ Other
o,Ublity a Reme Unity ck Lads*04A0[Ift) City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 16, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #16-89K Stetson Creek 5th Filing, Townhomes
@ Stetson Creek - Type I (LUC) PDP
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting;:
Wednesday, July 15,1998
Stetson Creek Fifth Filing July 22, 1998
If a subdrain system is installed as recommenced in the soils report, a hydrologic study needs to
be done and submitted for review and the design needs to be shown on the plans.
Site Plan
Show the property line as if the row is vacated.
First reading for the vacation will need to occur prior to the hearing for this project_
Show the easement along Timberline.
At the street intersections provide the stamped concrete at the cross walk areas only.
Show the temporary turnaround.
Landscaping Plan
The landscaping plan references that the landscaping should be done with the construction
phases. No phasing has been shown on the plans - not the landscape plans or the utility plans. If
there is phasing being proposed it needs to be shown on these documents.
Plat
On the vicinity map show: adjacent streets (collectors and arterials min), city limits, major public
facilities (schools)
Note 2 indicates a 10 foot easement is granted for gas behind the Row - a general 9 foot utility
easement is required behind the Row on locals and collectors, 15 foot on arterials. An additional
foot can be dedicated to the PSCo if so desired. but typically the last couple feet of the easement
contain the water stop, so if it is needed it should be a general utility easement.
(Continued on next
Date: r I0-7
i
IK HEIF YOU VISA TO RECM COPIES OF REVISIONS
PPit XS�e _ DreMe Report _ Oler
Z IJE t Z<Redlme Ufik p� ds*
Stetson Creek Fifth Filing (page 2 of')) July 22, 1998
Need planning acceptance signature and the attorney certification signature. Example is
attached. Your title verification does not meet our standard language.
You have indicated that easements be granted to PSCo for gas and electric. PSCo only provides
gas. The City Light and Power provides electric service.
The alleys need to be dedicated as emergency and public access easements.
The plat needs to be included and numbered within the utility plans as you have shown it, but the
plat its self needs to be labeled as sheet I of 2 and 2 of 2. That way when the plat is filed at he
county and somebody goes to look at it they won't be looking for the other 16 plus sheets.
Easements can be dedicated to specific utilities if that is the desire. Each utility for which an
easement is dedicated will need to sign the plat as acceptance of the easement(s). Typically
easements are dedicated as general utility easements unless otherwise requested by a utility. And
that is usually due to the desire to have an exclusive easement in which no other utilities can
exist.
Need to show and label the 9 foot and 15 foot utility easements adjacent to the streets.
Indicate the width of Stetson Creek Drive. Additional row may need to be dedicated in order to
meet current standards.
In the areas in which the sidewalk does not remain in the Row public access easements need to
be dedicated.
Row can not be vacated by plat. This has to be done by a city council action. Therefore submit a
legal description and sketch of the area proposed for vacation to start that process. The area
being vacated will need to be retained as a utility easement. The first reading of this ordinance
will need to occur prior to the hearing for this project.
The easements need to be labeled on the second sheet also.
Show the area to be dedicated as temporary turn around an indicate what it is and that it is to be
dedicated by separate document.
At what angle does Stetson Creek Court intersect Stetson Creek Drive?
Easement is shown in the south east corner. but not labeled. What is this?
The plat needs to be titled: A Plat of ...
Utility Plans
The title of the cover sheet should be: Utility Plans for ... With the month and year below (the
final month and year shown will be that in which the mylars are submitted for signatures)
Add the following note: 20. The developer is responsible for all construction costs for the initial
installation of traffic signing and striping for this development local street operations. In addition
the developer is responsible for all costs for traffic signing and striping related to directing traffic
access to and from the development (eg. All signing and striping for a right turn lane into the
development site).
The vicinity map needs to show the adjacent streets and the city limits.
Access easements are needed adjacent to the streets to accommodate the sidewalks. Additional
utility easements (greater than the 9 feet) may be needed in order to accommodate the utilities as
the walk location may affect the utility placement.
No Island in the center of the Cul-de-sac.
The typical cross section for private drives indicates the set back is to be 2 feet for type A units.
What are type A units?
Stetson Creek Fifth Filing (page 3 of 3) July 22, 1998
The typical public street section - this needs to be labeled as the local public street section. Label
the x-slopes as 2.0% min and 4.0% max. Do not show a pavement section as the pavement
section will be determined by the final soils report after the grading has been completed.
Is the curb and gutter existing on Timberline? If not provide plan and profile for the design of
this area.
Provide typical cross sections of the collector and arterial street to show the parkway and
sidewalk widths.
A cross pan is needed across Alder Creek Drive and has not been shown. A mid block x-pan
needs to be 12 feet min and has a different depth requirement than the intersection x-pan.
Provide tlowline profiles for the local street design. A centerline profile is not needed for local
streets, it is required for arterial if that design is needed. Will check the street design once
tlowline profiles are provided.
Modify street intersection detail to meet City standards.
Additional details are needed: handicap ramp detail, driveway detail (for alleys). detail no 4,
additions to existing sidewalk, mid -block x-pan detail
See plans for additional comments.
Stetson Creek 5`h filing (page 2 of 2) March 16, 1999
Plat (cont)
• Need to provide utility easements up to the buildings where the electrical, gas, telephone and
cable will connect to the building. As it is now these utilities will have to cross areas that are
not dedicated as utility easements.
• Add note regarding Row vacation.
See additional comments on plat
Utility Plans
• Show the colored stamped concrete at the street entrances and the striped x-walk across
Stetson Creek Drive in accordance with the site plan.
• Need to show how the grading for Madison Creek Drive ties into the existing contours
shown. An easement may be needed.(repeat) The contours for the street and the existing
contours do not tie together. Need to show the off -site grading needed for the drainage off
the end of Madison Creek Drive.
• On the `typical residential street section' it should be called 'Collector Street Section' and
need to show the parkway width and sidewalk location on this side of the development.
(Repeat) Label the parkway width and show the sidewalk to be built with this project.
• Delete the cross section shown for Madison Creek Drive. The x-section for this street is the
same as it is for the others, as has been shown throughout the review of this project.
On Street Plan and Profiles -
• show the PC stationing on the profiles
• The mid -block cross pan does not meet standards (.6% slope). In fact as shown will slope to
the north and not to the south. This needs to be modified to meet standards.
• The vertical spill curb needs to have a 2 foot pan to match the inflow curb and gutter that it
will be lining up with.
• The 12 foot cross pan shall have a depth of 1 3/4 inches per section 1.02.03.12 of the street
standards.
See additional comments on the plans.
. •
3flti3
try
p
t y
DATE: ember 17, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #16-89K Townhomes @ Stetson Creek, 5th
Filing - Type I - PDP
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, December 9, 1998
❑ No Comment
(Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Stetson Creek 5' filing
January 8, 1999
If a subdrain system is installed as recommenced in the soils report, a hydrologic study needs
to he done and submitted for review and the design needs to be shown on the plans.
Attached is a copy of the flyer for the Development Construction Permit (DCP) - this project
will need to obtain this permit prior to starting construction.
Landscaping Plan
• The landscaping plan references that the landscaping should be done with the construction
phases. No phasing has been shown on the plans - not the landscape plans or the utility
plans. If there is phasing being proposed it needs to be shown on these documents.
Plat
• On the vicinity map show: adjacent streets (collectors and arterials min), city limits, major
public facilities (schools)
• Use current attorney certification signature.
(Continued on next page)
Date: '� / Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH. TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
�P(at _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Ok `-
4fility ✓Redline Utility _ Landscape
City of Fort Cullins
Stetson Creek 5" filing January 8, 1999
Plat (continued)
• In your note under General Utility Easements you indicate that the utility easements are for
use by all utilities (that is okay) and then you give example of such, but your examples are
listing of other types of easements.
• Easements can be dedicated to specific utilities if that is the desire. Each utility for which an
easement is dedicated will need to sign the plat as acceptance of the easement(s). Typically
easements are dedicated as general utility easements unless otherwise requested by a utility.
And that is usually due to the desire to have an exclusive easement in which no other
utilities can exist.
• In the areas in which the sidewalk does not remain in the Row public access easements need
to be dedicated.
• Show the area to be dedicated as temporary turn around ar�indicate what it is and that it is to
be dedicated by separate document.
• Show any easement that may be needed to the East of Madison Creek Drive for grading
purposes.
Utility Plans
• The vicinity map needs to show the adjacent streets and the city limits.
• Some of the sidewalk locations as shown on the utility plans do not match that shown on the
site plan.
• For the storm sewer line being connected into on Stetson Creek Drive the manhole must be
outside of the 2 foot gutter. It does not appear that it is meeting that.
• All cuts into existing streets must comply with the current Street Repair and Reconstruction
Standards and Guideline.
• Need to show how the grading for Madison Creek Drive ties into the existing contours
shown. An easement may be needed.
• On the `typical residential street section' it should be called `Collector Street Section' and
need to show the parkway width and sidewalk location on this side of the development.
• Is a swale or anything needed for drainage off the end of Madison Creek Drive
• On Street Plan and Profiles - indicate the existing grades being tied into - show the PC
stationing on the profiles - add notes regarding the transition of the curb and gutter to
outflow at the mid -block cross pan location - indicate the location and the high point
elevation in the middle of the cul-de-sac
• Provide a detail for outfall curb and gutter with a 2 foot gutter for use in transition from
inflow to outflow gutter at the midblock pan location.
• Provide a detail for a 12 foot cross pan.
• Provide detail 44
See additional comments on the plans.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: ; 16, 1998 TO: Mapping/Drafting
PROJECT: #16-89K Stetson Creek 5th Filing, Townhomes
@ Stetson Creek - Type I (LUC) PDP
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 15,1998
GGUS cs 41 LdL���
6o-7- 1Zn0(0
'
Try 4 c-n el
cam:
/z 62,
L/.vz,
/0J j-q.IN'o
Date:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ pig _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Olher
_ UWity _ Redline UWit _ Landscape
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: September 24, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #16-89K Townhomes @ Stetson Creek - 5th
Filing - PDP - Type I, LUC
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, October 14, 1998
❑ No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Townhomes at Stetson Creek - 5th Filing October 26, 1998
Please note there is a. repay for Timberline Road due for this property.
Site Plan/ Landscape: Plan
• Sidewalk configuration is shown differently on the utility plans.
• Show the trickle pans.
• Note on landscape plan indicates that there is construction phasing. No construction phasing
is shown on the utility plans.
Plat
• The 9 foot and 15 foot utility easements adjacent to the streets MUST be dedicated as general
utility easements to the City of Fort Collins. All general utility easements (which provides
use by all utilities), water and sewer easements, drainage easements, emergency access and
general access easements are dedicated to the City of Fort Collins.
Easements can also be dedicated to specific utilities if desired. If done the easement needs to
be labeled as such (ie U.S. West easement) and the specific utility must sign the plat
accepting the easement. If doing so please check with the specific utility as they may not
wish to accept an exclusive easement.
Dat(Continued on next page )
e: io Z - Sipature:75, �� l
6092
City of Fort Collins
Townhomes at Stetson Creek - 5th Filing (sheet 2 of 3) October 26, 1998
• As for your grant of rights to easements, this is something we do not normally see on plats
within the City of Fort Collins. A general utility easement dedicated to the City can be
utilized by all public utilities and those franchised with the City. Private lines are not
allowed in public easements. We will not allow statements witch try to limit this or modify
what is allowed by our code.
• Dedication of common elements. Can not restrict the underlining use of the easements on the
property or limit the use of the sidewalks within these tract. Especially since there are public
access easements on these tracts for the public sidewalk and the access drives. Need to
provide exceptions for these areas and for the use of the area for easement purposes.
• Use current attorney certification statement.
• Notes 4 and 5 indicate that the City accepts maintenance of drainage and detention facilities,
and water and sewer facilities within the tracts. The City does not normally accept
maintenance of storm facilities that are not regional facilities (as indicated in the dedication
statement) and does not accept maintenance of individual water and sewer taps, only the
mains. Unless you get the departments to agree to this these statements need to be modified
or deleted.
• Label the easements on each sheet.
• Indicate where the utility and access easement along Stetson Creek Drive ends and the utility
easement begins.
• The row for the existing curb cut on Stetson Creek Drive that is not going to be used needs to
be vacated. This is done through City Council. Provide a legal description and sketch for
this area. This area will be retained as utility easement upon vacation. Any change
(vacation) can be shown on this plat.
Utility Plans
• Label and show the streets on the vicinity map.
• Show the trickle pans on the overall utility plan sheet. Need to make sure there are no
conflicts between the pans and the utilities.
• sidewalk configuration is not shown the same on all sheets of the utility plans and what is
shown on the utility plans does not match the site plan.
• A stormwater manhole is being shown within the curb and gutter. This will not be allowed,
the manhole must be out of the curb and gutter.
• Show how the proposed grading will tie into the existing grades. How is the turnaround to be
graded, where is the drainage going off of the end of Madison Creek Drive and how does it
get there? Will need easements for all of site grading and drainage.
• Identify what the edge of the private drives are to be where buildings are located.
• What is the typical residential street section (36 ft) suppose to be for? There should be no 36
foot streets in this development.
• Provide a x-section for Stetson Creek Drive (50 ft fl-fl) to identify the parkway width and
sidewalk dimensions. Provide this for Timberline also.
Plan profile sheets
• Provide elevations at all intersections in accordance with detail D-19.
• Show the existing elevations being tied into.
(Continued on next page)
Townhomes at Stetson Creek - 5th Filing (sheet 3 of 3) October 26, 1998
• The vertical curves shown do not meet design criteria for a 30 mph design on Stillwater
Creek Drive, Alder Creek Drive and Stetson Creek Court.
• Need to indicate the width of the midblock cross -pan. A minimum width of 12 feet is
required with a depth of 1 3/4 inches. All cross -pans require a min x-slope of .6% from lip of
gutter to lip of gutter. There is no slope shown on this x-pan. Also need to indicate that the
gutter needs to transition from inflow to outflow for the x-pan and back again.
• Show the cross -pan locations on the profiles.
• Indicate the high point elevation in the cul-de-sac. What are the x-slopes in the cul-de-sac.
Min slope of 1 % allowed.
• Sidewalk does not have to be built on the east side of Madison Creek Drive at this time.
• With the temporary cul-de-sac design as shown a cash escrow will be required for the curb
and gutter that can be built at this time due to the turn around. (A car can not drive over the
vertical curb) If the turn around is placed at the end of the improvements this will not be a
requirement. Indicate what the surface of the temporary turn around is to be.
• Show the design .and existing surface elevation of Madison Creek Drive for 500 feet beyond
the end of the improvements for this project. Section 1.02.03.06.b.
• Provide details for: mid -block x-pan, a mid -block detached walk handicap ramp. asphalt
paving detail D-25, Detail No 4.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
Citv of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: 16, 1998 TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT: #16-89K Stetson Creek 5th Filing, Townhomes
@ Stetson Creek - Type I (LUC) PDP
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting;:
Wednesday, July 15,1998
A final soils and pavement design report will be required at the time of construction.
Hate:
CHECK HERE IP YOU MSH TO REMVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ Plat _ Site _ Drtioage Report _ Ok
_ UtSity _ bae Utility _ Iaodseape