The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSTETSON CREEK PUD FOURTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-07-14City of Fort Collins Planninci DATE: I' PROJECT: r l PROJECT .. COMMENT SH EET �i DEPARTMENT:��C7 PLANNER: All comments must be received by: ❑ No Problems ❑� Problems or Concerns (see below) STETSON CREEK 3RD AND 4TH FILING PUD - PRELIMINARY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2, 1 996 • A VARIANCE NEEDS TO BE REQUESTED FOR THE 500 FOOT RADIUS ON STETSON CREEK DRIVE. ALSO ADDRESSED SHOULD BE A REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FOR REDUCING THE SITE DISTANCE EASEMENT REQUIREMENT. A 400 FOOT SITE DISTANCE IS NEEDED FOR A COLLECTOR STREET. THIS COULD IMPACT A LOT OF LOTS. SITE PLAN • ROCK CREEK. DRIVE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WITH THE TURN AROUND BUILT. • WHERE ROCI< CREEK DRIVE IS A COLLECTOR X-SECTION (SO FEET FL TO FL) THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE DETACHED. PLAT • INDICATE WHO IS TO OWN AND MAINTAIN ALL THE TRACTS. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) Date: Signature' CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE LANDSCAPE Ij UTILITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (303)221-6750 STETSON CREEK 3RD AND 4TH FILING PUD - PRELIMINARY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2, 1 996 (PAGE 2 OF 2) • I MARKED TWO TRACTS THAT WERE NOT LABELED AS TRACTS. • LABEL THE FF40NT AND BACK EASEMENTS ON THE LOTS. EVEN IF IT IS INDICATED IN THE NOTES IT SHOULD STILL BE INDICATED ON THE PLAN. • PLEASE TAKE THE CONTOUR LINES OFF. IT IS AWFULLY HARD TO READ WITH THEM ON. • THE SUBDRAIN EASEMENT SHOULD BE INDICATED AS A 'PRIVATE' SUBDRAIN EASEMENT. • THE TRACTS ALONG STETSON CREEK DRIVE SHOULD BE LABELED AS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS, UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT. • PROVIDE CURVE DATA FOR ALL CURVES. • INDICATE THE STREET WIDTHS AND CUL-DE-SAC BULB RADII. • ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: THE SUBDRAIN SYSTEM IS PRIVATE. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SUBDRAIN SYSTEM. • THE UTILITY PLANS SHOW BACK LOT EASEMENTS ON ALL LOTS. ?? • ADD SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS TO THE PLAT. • ADD THE FOLLOWING TO THE PLAT: SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT RESTRICTIONS THE AREA WITHIN SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS IS RESTRICTED TO THE FOLLOWING: I ) FENCES SHALL NOT EXCEED 42" IN HEIGHT AND SHALL BE OF OPEN DESIGN. IF FENCES EXCEED 32" IN HEIGHT, THEY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SPLIT RAIL WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION 12° BETWEEN HORIZONTAL MEMBERS. 2) BERMS, HEDGES, AND SHRUBS SHALL NOT EXCEED 32" IN HEIGHT. 3) TREE PLANTING SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO DECIDUOUS TREES ONLY. THE LOWEST BRANCH OF ANY TREE SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 42" FROM GRADE. • THERE NEEDS TO BE A NOTE ON THE PLAT THAT ACCESS ON CORNER LOTS THAT ABUT TO STETSON CREEK DR MUST NOT TAKE ACCESS OFF OF STETSON CREEK DR. ALL ACCESS TO THOSE LOTS MUST BE TAKEN OFF OF THE LOCAL STREET OR CUL-DE-SAC. UTILITY PLANS COVER SHEET • ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE TO THE GENERAL NOTES: 19. THE CITY SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OR INJURIES SUSTAINED IN THIS DEVELOPMENT AS A RESULT OF GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE, WHETHER RESULTING FROM GROUNDWATER FLOODING, STRUCTURAL DAMAGE OR OTHER DAMAGE UNLESS SUCH DAMAGE OR INJURIES ARE SUSTAINED AS A RESULT OF THE CITY'S FAILURE TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN ITS WATER, WASTEWATER AND/OR STORMDRAINAGE FACILITIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT. OVERALL UTILITY PLAN • IT IS NOT "SITE" DISTANCE, BUT SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS. • I HAVE SHOWN THE SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS NECESSARY BASED ON A 300 FOOT SIGHT DISTANCE LENGTH. SEE NOTE ABOVE REGARDING SIGHT DISTANCE LENGTHS, THE USE OF 300 FEET NEEDS TO BE JUSTIFIED IF IT IS TO BE USED. • IT APPEARS THAT AN OFFSITE SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT IS NEEDED TO THE NORTH. THAT WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF FINAL REVISIONS (SINCE FINAL IS ALREADY SUBMITTED). • ROCK CREEK: DRIVE NEEDS TO HAVE A DETACHED SIDEWALK WHERE IT IS DESIGNED AS A COLLECTOR (SO FEET FL TO FL). • THE NORTHWEST CURVE LEADING INTO THE CUL-DE-SAC CIRCLE ON MADISON CREEK COURT NEEDS TO BE BUMPED OUT TO BETTER ACCOMMODATE TRAFFIC AND PARKED VEHICLES. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 26, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #16-89M Stetson Creek, 4`h Filing, RU.D—Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by: June 16,1999 ❑Po Comment roblems or Concerns (see below or attached) Plat Map • Modify the Sight Distance Easement Restrictions language to the more current language. • Add the recently adopted note regarding Notice of Other Documents and revise the Sight Distance Easement Restrictions note. (see attached) • Replace all occurrences of "Director of Engineering" with "City Engineer". Utility Plan • The fire hydrant on the cul-de-sac of Madison Creek Drive should be relocated outside of the sidewalk within the utility easement. • Replace all occurrences of "Director of Engineering" with "City Engineer". • Note the existing sidewalk on Sheet 2. • Please provide a separate street section for Madison Creek Drive. It is difficult to read combining the "typical street section' with Madison Creek Drive. Site Plan and Landscape Plan • The fire hydrant: on Coral Creek Court is incorrectly shown on the site plan as being located on the sidewalk. Relocate the fire hydrant behind the sidewalk (as correctly noted on the utility plan.) • The fire hydrant on the cul-de-sac of Madison Creek Drive should be relocated outside of the sidewalk within the utility easement. • easement Please label the site dice shown on the plans. sta Date: G� Signature: Please send co ies ' of marked revisions Plat Site �IItility 'Landscape ❑ NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS City of Fort Collins i NOTICE OF OTHER DOCUMENTS ALL PERSONS TAKE NOTICE THAT THE DEVELOPER AND/OR OWNER HAS EXECUTED CERTAIN DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THIS DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATE CERTAIN RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THE DEVELOPER AND/OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OF ALL OR PORTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE, MANY OF WHICH OBLIGATIONS CONSTITUTE PROMISES AND COVENANTS WHICH RUN WITH THE LAND. THE SAID DOCUMENTS MAY INCLUDE. WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, SITE AND LANDSCAPE COVENANTS, FINAL SITE PLAN, FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, WHICH DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND SHOULD BE CLOSELY EXAMINED BY ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN PURCHASING ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. Sight Distance Easement — The sight distance easement is an easement required by the City at some street intersections where it is necessary to protect the line of sight for a motorist needing to see approaching traffic and to react safely for merging their vehicle into the traffic flow. The following are requirements for certain objects that may occupy a sight distance easement for level grade: (1) Structures and landscaping within the easement shall not exceed 24 inches in height with the following exceptions: (a) Fences up to 42 inches in height may be allowed as long as they do not obstruct the line of sight for motorists. (b) Deciduous trees may be allowed as long as all branches of the trees are trimmed so that no portion thereof or leaves thereon hang lower than six (6) feet above the ground, and the trees are spaced such that they do not obstruct line of sight for motorists. Deciduous trees with trunks large enough to obstruct line of sight for motorists shall be removed by the owner. For non -level areas these requirements shall be modified to provide the same degree of visibility. Date: /"*N\ PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current PlanninE DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mapping/Drafting PROJECT: #16-89M Stetson Creek, 4" Filing, P.U.D. — Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, April 14,1999 Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _ Oraiaage Repo Utility _ Rdmc Utility _ Laadscape Sc c C-/t T S all - -Other City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: March 17, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #16-89M Stetson Creek, 4th Filing, P.U.D.—Final (LDGS) PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: April 14, 1999 ❑ No Problems El Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Utility Plans • Sidewalk exists along the southeast portion of this site. The utility plans should be revised to show the existing; sidewalk. • If the 51h Filing of Stetson Creek does not have Madison Creek Drive fully constructed to this site at the time of this development, this site shall improve Madison Creek Drive to tie into the nearest existing public street improvements. • Provide details for access ramps and additions to existing sidewalks. • The 5`h Filing of Stetson Creek will be required to provide a detached sidewalk for its portion of Madison Creek Drive. The sidewalk along Madison Creek Drive internal to this site should continue as detached. Curb and gutter type should also match with the 5"h Filing. • Approximate location of sight distance easements necessary based on a 400-foot sight distance length have been noted and should be added to the utility plans. Final Plat • Sight Distance Easements need to be added to the plat. • The final plat for Stetson Creek, 51h Filing should record prior to the recordation of this Plat Map to ensure legal access for lots 23-35. • The City has adopted new plat language. The plat should be revised accordingly. Final Landscape Plan No comments (see plans for additional comments) Date: ��/u/�/C% Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS: SITE El UTILITY NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS LANDSCAPE