The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRICHIES EXPRESS CARWASH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-06-17REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: FEBRUARY 21,2001 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 315-00 Richie's Express Carwash PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: February 21,2001 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: 74, Pe J. Da JL. w A X uke.c +4111 iJ tz.r'.j..(eGo fl Comments from Mapping Drafting need to be addressed we corre t44 `e),! DejLly t 4d;., '2-. Show appropriate limits of asphalt repairs in existing streets/add note indicating limits are estimates and final limits will be determined by City inspector in the field - d d e € `_' °^ r(fat 4 4. "Show widths odf drives toe q, d-t-W Z,,ldl_ .^ S1ee'1 3 4' e- 4. Check to see if there will be sight distance problems at drives &5 —Should be concrete enhanced crosswalks at drive isle crossings r.;f. =.td.-t -Atd "J'.. -,.,,,,;, f, b: Drainage basins I and IV drain into street across driveways. This is not allowed, concentrate Flows and drain through underwaIk drain r�,' a A[_ -W 1,_4nf 4.x.-� «t;-4I _ t=re 4- 0'�r4 -7.` Appears off -site construction easement is needed at bank. A, busk. oe-. ' •T--•t N4 e:•1.s: �•' •' a=:+ Y. ' Detention pond appears to drin out into College Avenue. This is State R.O.W. and not allowed. As a minimum you will need CDOT approval . re-s= r +e- ,ems" ems k le r, •� µ v >. <;` Q Enginners plat and ]im Sell Design legal don't match, coordinate these i._,e. 4,W Errors are in Stewarts legal - c..<_ .r A ,; rEr, �d - ,t. - �, orsfl ` r�.3• 11. Additional comments on bluelines Date: Feb.21,2001 Signature: Dave Stringer PLE_ASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS E 'Plat fie D-Unity 13-Cndscape 91 rainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS-Sl MIT MYLARS • Please provide a public access easement in the location shown on the utility plans. It may be easier to provide a blanket easement over the entire parking/drive thru area. Response: • Contact the Transportation Planning Department regarding the location of the sidewalk along the east side of the development (adjacent to South College Avenue). Response: • The curb -cut along South College Avenue will need to be closed. The Developer will have to acquire a State Highway Access Permit from CDOT to perform the work. A State Highway Access Permit also needs to be obtained for the removal of the sidewalk along South College Avenue. Response: • Please provide a detail of the sidewalk/bridge connection. Response: • Please refer to the utility plans for additional comments and concerns. Site Plan Comments: • You will need to contact Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, to inspect the trees that are proposed to be removed. Response: • Please remove all of the contours from the Site Plan. Response: • Some of the text is extremely difficult to read. Please darken so it is legible. Response: • Consider separating the items being proposed from the existing items and items slated for removal. Response: • Please reconfigure the parking stalls to provide better vehicular circulation through the site. Response: Development Review Comments — Page 3 • Contact the Transportation Planning Department regarding the reconfiguring and extension of the sidewalk along South College Avenue. Response: • Please refer to the Site Plan for additional comments and concerns. Development Review Comments — Page 4 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: April 18 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #15-00 Richie's Express Carwash PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: May 17, 2000 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Utility Plan Comments: *--Talk with Wally Muscott regarding the property line adjustment and how to show that on the Plat. According to the City's records, a portion of this property has never been platted. Therefore, it would need to be replatted. There is a possibility that the Frontage Road ROW extends onto this property. r T. ' yr +� c �� {UJ A11�. ,Jrnc rt IiYt fa OJOW ¢au F?a ✓. i lndoi,./ esponse: :f J 7 f Po +.0 iwa4 may a a.r' itian//.t is rl pa- Z i-.6[.-is, 1-L, f nrf Pia I/,J rs ti 1- en.itnr,� Upon talking with City staff, at one point in time, the bank was interested in vacating the Frontage Road ROW. You may want to contact them to see if they are still interested in doing this. If so, this will most likely affect the north access into this site. Response: T; c t o h doe -I sip s w 4 +r a aft r✓� r rlt •/ '�. 'An additional 3 feet is needed for the utility easement along Foothills Parkway. This can be provided through the replat of this property. j ! ( c 9 , r Response: u,in. riedr-_ . (e, e,, ctJ e(, r.Y6'T- 4-�a-71l e , IXv,.-u:r-1 4-6---Since South College Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial Street on the Master Street Plan, an additional 12.5 feet is needed along die frontage of this property (20.5' — 8.01(bike lane) _ 2.5'). This can be provided through the replat of this property. ry Response: iA 1"�- O-Y 4- i!•�.to Date: May 22, 2000 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS Plat RI Site 2 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT &_-Please dedicate a 151 utility easement along South College Avenue per the street standards. This will need to be located adjacent to the proposed ROW dedication. This can be provided through the replat of this property./ p) 7 Response u,is �e•L AC 9s caj lct lY,I /. qnc Tl�1 °Jr trpn Ercl �! { a- yfsi-. ✓ Please include a signature block for the ditch company to sip.. J � . 1 4�4 L/,+L0. � Response: w� 4�-Je . ah A+lYJJ x! j;�nn t e: acic Please show all easements being dedicated with this project on the Plat. Response: We. QI� The width of a driveway can be a maximum of 35 feet wide. Please reduce the width of the proposed access per the street standards. Response: T-A'e • cr 33' Gn d 13 r R� l The nose of the landscaped median at Foothills Parkway access needs to be a minimum of 20 feet from the Flowline of Foothills Parkway. Response T i i eK.!1 Lift Please reconfigure the parking spaces. They are very awkward and provide poor vehicular circulation. Response: T k e- n a s4 L. li aJ a.t r •e V it e� Ik--lhlease show the existing accesses along the west side of Foothills Parkway. Response: w4 q 6 (e ( A14%11r,j d r,vawcy. t?/ Please show the proposed ROW and utility easements. Response: r✓f <d-a{e sC iC' p 14tj 0h f 11e'< ++! +Twnty u++ 24Jtat f,, P(a'i Please provide a sidewalk connection out to Foothills Parkway. 'Response: ez Fr.4,/l kw.7 wAl (-.-,For all curves, provide curve information. Also provide necessary dimensions, widths lengths, radii, etc. so the site can be constructed correctly. Response: Alt' OG Tl ;eJFLeA 11rE PLA.0 Wei wrcc_ G10 dI -f 1TG Pz- AV I 7-NF U7-1L1ey !?a Aug Development Review Comments - Page 2 i.-4ease provide a public access easement in the location shown on the utility plans. It may be y easier to provide a blanket easement over the entire parking/drive thru area. Response: Ti4 a VAE:!vr_ w AY rQ'•, s.6 �oe.Or- +_ANL- Te Foorpla,(.S fA&tkc Ay HAI' eAlre Avk'T OAT fos.%f#T. Contact the Transportation Planning Department regarding the location of the sidewalk along the east side of the development (adjacent to South College Avenue). Response: kc. ja)r tv, lk- rk ¢a /cn rP ✓1 fe-/ Txt- GK:s 7%N W Atk Wlc. as Fe move!>. jar The curb -cut along South College Avenue will need to be closed. The Developer will have to acquire a State Highway Access Pen -nit from CDOT to perform the work. A State Highway Access Permit also needs to be obtained for the removal of the sidewalk along South College Avenue. Twr.fC ; an d.;< ,xtL_rt; ifvr.TiYfq.Jc To �s s'n c v` y Response: �/Fo G htl. far . T y 0 c.r evk� w A T »t �Q Please provide a detail of the sidewalk/bridge connection. Response: (ease refer to the utility plans for additional comments and concerns. Site Plan Comments: 2� You will need to contact Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, to inspect the trees that are proposed to be removed. Response: 21 Please remove all of the contours from the Site Plan. Response: 22 • Some of the text is extremely difficult to read. Please darken so it is legible. Response: 2� • Consider separating the items being proposed from time existing items and items slated for removal,. Response: Zk• Please reconfigure the parking stalls to provide better vehicular circulation through the site. Response: Development Review Comments - Page 3 • Contact the Transportation Planning Department regarding the reconfiguring and extension of the sidewalk along South College Avenue. Zy Response: 0• Please refer to the Site Plan for additional comments and concerns. Development Review Comments — Page 4 PROJECT WILAM COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planninfy DATE: April 18, 2000 TO: Mapping/Drafting PROJECT: #15-00 Richie's Express Carwash - PDP — Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Roo Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for fitture reference 1--If- / A� 7/ C 4 5 i4- /y l 199s /-inJ f�cso/s i /�ii+ / C 4scsrrl�n� ccl.4s 1JESG2� i3c�r_� / ��AT FF F C. LTS ,9yn rJeJSc/! J, �Ar T/fps /a Tr�c r4 C Copy — ��- <J2oan 13'_7 11�m�f�U/-s "T?) �I-1�cK r�c�pi• !(o. 95o5ZZ3 Go aWd f:C ��'90 J-='bi d�l.�. �.}iCy r.: � v!_ ✓'�{ lY:6H.��' Wa�.�µpC✓i!f-%r_�. Signalure CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Pod Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 30, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #15-00 RICHIE'S EXPRESS CARWASH All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 21, 2001 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** i•l,&g ' L� l/ ISS Y R-F CCv5E5 , GEGA Z- b06751+/7 ,1605E Loe'SniT ✓�/a7c// Pc137-, 7f/t�7 I{ZGNl7 GT 5 p�AN/i�/G AIA-5 ])�cSNT /7f 7--C TF/E PL/�TS LC- GAL O� FZ'Wr 56)4WZ)"q -49Sas zz5 is /l/oT- PC'O CS 7(ZI fin% i L, r'J6.y ♦,,,a vwJw s:e. 2-. Te.1 ._ ire. ... .!a Hao 17� "z�v (�av� lSccsN Tf-F-,Z- Cce7 e l f4 Pc,-,g — (JJ 4,,;-VLc to Jo.,! .' 4 c HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISION zt---_-3it�— _—HrarageRcpnt ignatu fi—___ Utility — Redline Utility _ Landscape REVISION COMMENT SH1 DATE: FEBRUARY 21,2001 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 315-00 Richie's Express Carwash PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: February 21,2001 Problems or Concems (see below or attached) Comments: Comments from Mapping Drafting need to be addressed 2. Show appropriate limits of asphalt repairs in existing streets/add note indicating limits are estimates and final limits will be determined by City inspector in the field 3. Show widths odf drives 4. Check to see if there will be sight distance problems at drives 5. Should be concrete enhanced crosswalks at drive isle crossings 6. Drainage basins I and IV drain into street across driveways. This is not allowed, concentrate flows and drain through underwalk drain /! Appears off -site construction easement is needed at bank 8. Detention pond appears to drin out into College Avenue. This is State R.O.W. and not allowed. As a minimum you will need CDOT approval 9. Enginners plat and Jim Sell Design legal don't match, coordinate these 10. Errors are in Stewarts legal 11. Additional comments on bluelines Date: Feb.21,2001 Signature: Dave Stringer PI -WE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISI9NS 2'Plat ate 0-lin'lity E?[�ndscape p-Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS-SU MIT MYLARS IREVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 30, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #15-00 RICHIE'S EXPRESS CARWASH All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 21, 2001 �Q , No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** (lZa /, P� AT CLvSc s . ! EGa � DoESN 7- ,CcoJE f L_ -�7 ,gZCNITEGT''5 DLrGFL � C i�%)oiti d///T 7`///;�T D�GSNT /7f�TcN THE �L/a7S LE/mf+L O� f'G�T BOUNVF�� Z ��DeS7t2 i./ —4S�m RSUs ZZ53 /S Ald7— Spa ✓ F 3, (�onur c Pi2L�lto�S C�mr7cTl7 Mh7 17 'Zeno ✓-IA�� 15�z5� C"(?7 e F l E-f1� l'c-a,— 61417 IL vU— , f�HERE IF YOU WISH To RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISION t�� at --- $ity _ — lgna U , -- -- Utility _ Redfine Utility _ Landscape PROJECT i�� COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current PlanninE DATE: April 18, 2000 TO: Mapping/Drafting PROJECT: #15-00 Richie's Express Carwash - PDP — Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting,: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for fixture reference (l AnJ �c D! 5 i /2 i ,� J L A S cr/�/ c✓ i �.4 S TlqlqT/1 F F C_ C 7$ � N[ S �� A A- TIT/S r1-Acr4'70— 1 �7l lr Tl fc C sc�mc� �U'4S l�� 6�,'L0 1� ID T�k� N c so 5 Zz 53 Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape c;ty of Fort couins PROJECT ice.. COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannine DATE: April 18, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #15-00 Richie's Express Carwash - PDP — Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference t L^ (�ri1 �,K f�, G/� CHECK HERE IF YOtJ WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS __Plat site __Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: April 18, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: # 15-00 Richie's Express Carwash PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: May 17, 2000 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Utility Plan Comments: • Talk with Wally Muscott regarding the property line adjustment and how to show that on the Plat. According to the City's records, a portion of this property has never been platted. Therefore, it would need to be replatted. There is a possibility that the Frontage Road ROW extends onto this property. Response: Upon talking with City staff, at one point in time, the bank was interested in vacating the Frontage Road ROW. You may want to contact them to see if they are still interested in doing this. If so, this will most likely affect the north access into this site. Response: • An additional 3 feet is needed for the utility easement along Foothills Parkway. This can be provided through the replat of this property. Response: Since South College Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial Street on the Master Street Plan, an additional 12.5 feet is needed along the frontage of this property (20.5' — 8.0'(bike lane) _ 12.5'). This can be provided through the replat of this property. Response: Date: May 22, 200 ) Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 2 Plat Q Site RI Utility Q Landscape 11 Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT • Please dedicate a 15' utility easement along South College Avenue per the street standards. This will need to be located adjacent to the proposed ROW dedication. This can be provided through the replat of this property. Response: • Please include a signature block for the ditch company to sign. Response: • Please show all easements being dedicated with this project on the Plat. Response: • The width of a driveway can be a maximum of 35 feet wide. Please reduce the width of the proposed access per the street standards. Response: • The nose of the landscaped median at Foothills Parkway access needs to be a minimum of 20 feet from the flowline of Foothills Parkway. Response: • Please reconfigure the parking spaces. They are very awkward and provide poor vehicular circulation. Response: • Please show the existing accesses along the west side of Foothills Parkway. Response: • Please show the proposed ROW and utility easements. Response: • Please provide a sidewalk connection out to Foothills Parkway. Response: For all curves, provide curve information. Also provide necessary dimensions, widths lengths, radii, etc. so the site can be constructed correctly. Response: Development Review Comments — Page 2