Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRICHARDS LAKE PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-06-17PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: September 18, 1998 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #58-86E Richards Lake P.U.D., Phase 1 - LDGS - Final All comments must be received by Steve Olt no -Later —than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, October 7, 1998 Date: Signature: — - _ CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REV51ONS _ Plat _ SiCe�I _ Drainage Report _ fter U6V "r _ Rdme Ugly _ Lands* City of Fort Collins 3 �3 Provide intersection data for each intersection, once, per City detail D-18 or D-19. • General - Provide Details and cross -sections for both entrance medians. - Design street approach grades at intersections to City standards. - Provide only one cross -street handicap ramp at "T" intersections. - Decide correct name for Sailor's Cove or Sailor's Court (sht Rl,-R7), and Quail Cove (R1, Rl1). • Redsail Place needs to be designed as a Connector Street not a Residential Local street . • Minimum curve radius' for Morningstar Drive is 610'. Please revise. Smooth out the profile as shown on sheet R10. • Show sight distance easement (will allow reduced visual length of 225% if you do an engineering evaluation proving the 225' visual length provides roughly same time due to expected reduced speeds on this curvy street. • Provide these details on sheet R19: - City sidewalk ramp details for each intersection type. - City street intersection approach detail D-18 and/or D-19. - Mid -block ramp details. - Raised x-walk details per City Traffic Dept (Dan Holland) criteria. Will need to verify acceptance of requested raised x-walk on Somerset Place with Eric Bracke (Traffic Dept) and Kathleen Reavis (Transportation planning). - Asphalt paving detail at crosspans, City detail D-25. - Pedestrian / bike path connection detail D-4. • Remove all pavement section references. • Revise details as requested on R19. ############# SEE OTHER COMMENTS THROUGHOUT PLAN SET ************** Signature__,�/� Date Please provide listed revdged plans upon next submittal: Site, Landscape, Plat, Utility REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: April 30, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richard's Lake, First Filing PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Michael Coley Utility Plans: • Include plan and profile sheets for Richard's Lake Road. • Entitle the project "Filing" one, not "phase" one. • Specify which parcels/tracts are to be dedicated and maintained by the HOA. k City standards require 15' utility easements along all minor arterials. •• Include all proposed uses in your tracts (i.e. Drainage and Utility easement) k It is not necessary to provide easements within the ROW. • Pedestrian connections need to be properly labeled on the plat. x Easements that are not within the platted boundary need to be dedicated by seperate document. *The minimum tangent length at an intersection is 100'. * If the power lines going through the site are to be relocated, than the existing easement should be vacated. • Label sight distance easements. • Please show all easements on overall utility plans. • Install Type 3 barricades at all dead ends_ Offsite improvements: • a 15' utility easement is needed along Co. Rd. 11. • Provide a right turn lane into Morningstar from the North. • Provide a left turn lane onto Co. Rd. 52 from the North. • County Road 11 needs to be built to minor arterial standards along frontage. *Need three lanes at Co. Rd. 50 (min. 36') ** See redline plans for additional comments ** / Date: 4/3V/ c� Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions _Plat _ Site i Utility _Landscape o�S�k /�"�'�"�IJ City of Fort Collins City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE:10 - 8 - 98 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richards Lake - off- site PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer A11 comments must be received by: October 7, 1998 BNo Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Provide detail of intersection grades as per City Standard 2. All existing overhead poles and wires to be underground for all on -site property. 3. Provide cross sections of existing County Road 11 for roadway section adjacent to developemnt 4. Provide design information 1000 feet north of project 5. Provide flowline profiles of County Road I 1 curb gutter 6. Omit word proposed, these improvements will -be built with this project. 7. What happens to existing landscaping with road widening south of Richards Lake Road 8. Call out on plans what power poles, mail boxes and other structures will need to be relocated as a result of off -site improvements 9. Need to provide legals, exhibts and attorney certifications for all slope, construction and drainage easements needed as a result of off -site improvements 10. Provide cross sections every 100 feet of off -site improvements, typical section is not acceptable. 11. Submit a pavement design report for City approval of proposed overlay thickness 12. Other comments as redlined on plans Date: Signature -- PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 29, 1999 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #58-86E Richard's Lake P.U.D., Phase 1 — Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, Januar r 2000 ❑ No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES ]FOR\ FUTURE REFERENCE" 1 , /����Y�.-v�L� � �Yh_+V � J��.�C� W�0.V`� b V-� V.s� K�M. � _ � � �u♦ 3. Ll� Date: _Signature:_ CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other _ Utility _ Redline Utility — Iendseape PROJECT City of Fart Currins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: 1- 26 - 00 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richard's Lake - off site improvements PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Need to provide legals, exhibits and attorney certifications for all slope, construction and drainage easements needed as a result of off -site improvements prior to schedule for P&Z. 2. Submit a pavement design report for City approval of proposed overlay thickness 3. Change date on all plan sheets to reflect year 2000 4. Remove reference to pavement thickness on roadway section. This will be determined by Pavement design report 5. Need easements or permission letters from affected property owners for driveway and mail box work. Date: Signature.���2 PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: n PLAT SITE rq UTILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannint DATE: - DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: PLANNER: All comments must be received by: No Problems _ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) O.D.P. • Th6 street between parcels G and E should be designated as a connector due to on -street parking needs and higher density • Assume the north entrance street is planned as a connector and turns south as sucn to the section of roadway between parcels D and F • The Developer is obligated for all improvements identified in the traffic study. The City and the County will need to agree on the timing of the installation of the various improvements based on the proposed phasing/build-out of the development Plat • R.o.w. widths/easement widths are not clearly labeled • Information is difficult to read • Make sure r.o.w. curve radii correspond to flowline radii as specified in street standards Soils Report: • If subdrains are necessary at the time of final design, a hydrologic study will be required. A design in conformance with City criteria must be shown on the final utility plans for any subdrain system in the r.o.w. Date: -'I' / "! 7 Signature: i r `V� - 1 PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: 13.', PLAT SITE UTILITY LANDSCAPE Variance Request: • The request is approved as stated, but please retype the original request to reflect the chosen solution and submit a final copy for formal approval for the record. Street Lighting Plan/Variance: • Staff still needs to meet with the Traffic Engineer and Development Engineering Manager to go over the following comments and to obtain any additional input on the proposal. Providing the additional information requested below will help in discussing the request further. • Submit a specification, brochure, etc. to show what the proposed bollard lighting will look like and what level of lighting they provide. The City's concerns are with vandalism, maintenance and labor costs, and roadside safety (placement of the bollard in relation to the curb). • A standard residential street light should be provided on each cul-de-sac, not just bollard lighting. This will be discussed further with other departments including Police. • Show and describe the lighting proposed internal to the community center area and the multi -family areas. The private lighting proposed for these areas may reduce the need for street lighting in these activity areas where safety is a concern. Staff will review the proposal and evaluate if any additional street lighting is necessary or not. • There may need to be more lighting along CR 11 - for example at the Richard's Lake intersection. • Still have not seen an example or spec for the proposed house number lighting with Hearthfire P.U.D. - assume the same is proposed in the Richard's Lake project - please provide a spec/sample. Utility Plans: • Richard's Lake Road - Staff will be recommending to the Director of Engineering that the improvements as proposed by the developer (connector street widening, curb, gutter, and sidewalk north side) is acceptable and appropriate so long as the drainage on the south side of the road can be handled without impacting the existing properties. Is there a drainage ditch on the south side ? Please address/show on the plans how drainage will be handled along the south side of Richard's Lake Road. • Redsail Place south of Morningstar Drive appears to be of a volume and configuration that would meet the standards for a residential local access cross- section if the developer wants to narrow it down. • Is Somerset Place a connector or local width ? It can be a local south of Morningstar Drive given the volumes and adjacent uses/configuration. • Overall, the street network and classification works much better than the original layout did. Schooner's cove could also be a local residential cross-section - volumes for this roadway were not shown on the traffic study addendum but are assumed to be < 1000 Adjustments to the multi -family area layout and configuration may be necessary at final due to the needs of the utilities (separation, installation, and maintenance). January 8, 1997 Mr. Mike Herzig CITY OF FORT COLLINS Engineering Department PO Box 580 Fort Collins CO 80522 RE: Richard's Lake P.U.D. Phase I - Preliminary Whitesail Way - Minimum Centerline - Variance Request Dear Mike: As per your comments regarding the above referenced variance request as submitted by Matt Delich on November 20, 1996, we have made revisions to the plans as you suggested under Option #L Lot 279 has been eliminated and left as open space. Also a commitment from the developer has been made to provide street lighting at this curve. (A copy of the revised Site and Landscape Plan is enclosed.) Hopefully, this resolves your concerns and the radius and the variance request can be approved. Should you have additional comments or require additional information, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, tJIMq�ELL PESIGN Inc. h V i �%hefi�as 3 �}ugan , k% encl . rJD'IA f cc : Steve Oh; Kerr, Asltheck, Scutt Price; Dave Mathews Richard's Lake Comment, 1 January 8, 1997 Ms. Kerrie Ashbeck ��rra t�l(�-)�n'� CITY OF FORT COL.LINS/ Engineering Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins CO 80524 RE: Richard's Lake P.U.D. - Amended Overall Development Plan (ODP) & Phase L - Preliminary P.U.D.' 1Io Dear Kerrie: As per your comments of December i6, 1996, for the above referenced development proposal, we have made the following revisions: I. 'fhe sails report has been updated by Terracon and a copy is attached for .a � your review. The final pavement design will be completed at the time of construction. 2. The Street Lighting Plan and variance request have been sent to Mr. Gary Diede for review. A copy of the plan is attached for your review. 3. The Variance Request for the Minimum Centerline Radius on Whitesail Cove: Per Mike Herzig's comments, Lot 279 has been eliminated and will remain as open space. A street light has been shown in this location on the lighting plan. 4. A traffic study was submitted on December 20, 1996, to Mr. Steve Olt. An additional copy is enclosed for your review as well as an update letter addressing street sizing. 5. Morningstar Way (Richard's Lake Drive) and Morningstar Drive (Richard's Lake Way) R.O.W. widths have been increased to 76' and will be built to the collector street standard with on -street parking. Waxwing Lane, Somerset Place and Schooner's Cove have been increased to a 57' R.O.W. and will be built to the connector local street standard. (See attached street sizing letter from Matt Delich.) 6. Richard's Lake Road will be built to a connector local street standard within the existing 60' R.O.W. although the developer is requesting on behalf of the homeowners on the south side of Richard's Lake Road that no curb, gutter or sidewalk be required on the south half of the road. 7. Per your comment on the overloading of collector streets, we have added another connection north of Morningstar Drive (Richard's Lake Way) to County Road 11. This connection is shown on the O.D.P. At the request of the neighbors on Richard's Lake Road, the developer had agreed to limvt as much as possible any street connections to Richard's Lake Road. Therefore, we did not extend Redsail Place out to Richard's Lake Road. Instead, Redsail Way was extended out to C.R. 11 south of Morningstar Drive and 350' north of the centerline of Richard's Lake Road. We feel this will accomplish the same intent as extending Redsail Place because it will provide more direct circulation to and from the southern portion of the property directly to C.R. 11. This connection will be it 57' R.O.W. with a connector local road street section. 8. A "Context Diagram" showing the surrounding areas and transportation network was prepared. A copy is enclosed for your use. 9. The O.D.P. has been revised to label the classification of the proposed streets. 10. The phasing of the Final P.U.D.s and required improvements will be determined at the time it Final P.U.D. is submitted. �r REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 11, 1998 TO: Mapping & Drafting PROJECT: #58-86E Richards Lake PUD, Filing One - Final All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 2,1998 1, 1I'F vnw'� �l IIV;e5 -kr 5Cw"e tWfo. / - I Cf KfCC- 2-1iitk c'.ur��eS Lreed cJ<o1c� �cuYl-,ncrs wv.d A%S��Aec•� "'��oYS� tINC oj� �Ti Ce�� oti Co. 7 raj. tl. 'R1'J r S ,;jscj o� S. SI;eN+. r„{ sl,oulc>I .7. ,ic 6,&eJ 'tlte_ �o�tjg4r C>. �Tlle 0"q-t A )I17E 511PP� �1Q"Ibe r5 Q1C% 4JI^okqq 0�'l ,P 1� ' f All �u1r �c'>Srd 4vl e' eXi.:� Yc�✓�"��IPVI IJ YLE ct� �t lJl� Io L Gq l'ea Wa ire Srree>f �o e5 0.�. w;�Zl ✓ Pr SPrvlc�=s� �f ll/ Date: CHECK HERE IF YOU FISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ PHt _ Site _ Draioaage R" _ Mer _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape Kerrie Ashbeck/ Engineering Department/ Cit) of Fort Collins page 2 January 8, 1997 It. Morningstar Drive (Richard's Lake Way) has been widened at the intersection of C. R. I I to provide additional turn lanes. By widening the R.O. W. and road, we feel the median can remain. 12, All Utility Plan comments are being addressed by Intermountain Engineering and you should have their revised plans 13. The developer will contribute his required contribution to construct County Road I 1 adjacent to the site to the City's minor arterial street standard with an 84' R.O.W. Additional R.O.W. will be dedicated to the City to provide 'k the required R.O.W. width (42') from the centerline of the read to the west. 14. Richard's Lake Road will be constructed to the City's connector local Street Standard within the existing 60' R.O.W. 15. The Site Plan has been revised to show only crosswalks at critical locations. If these crosswalks are to be stamped colored concrete, it will be determined at the time of Final P.U.D. submittal. 16. Street cross -sections have been labeled to identify which sections correspond to the correct streets. (These cross -sections are included on page I of the Site and Landscape Plan.) 17. Note #6 has been removed. 18. Richard's Lake Drive and Richard's Lake Way have been renamed to Morningstar Way and Morningstar Drive, respectively. I've enclosed 6 copies of the revised Site and Landscape Plan; I copy of the soils report; I copy of the Street Lighting Plan and Variance Request Letter; 6 copies of the Overall Development Plan; I copy of the "Context Diagram;" 1 copy of the Traffic Study; and a copy of your Project Comment Letter for your review. Should you have additional questions or need additional information, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, JIM SELL D N Inc. TiZfh4s J. DjV encl. Tmasr cc: Steve Olt Scott Pnce, Dave Mathews Richard's Lakc Suhmittal PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: November 27, 1996 DEPT: Enginering PROJECT: #58-86D Richard's Lake PUD, Phase I - Preliminary PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by: Monday, December 16, 1996 RICHARD'S LAKE P.U.D. - O.D.P. and Preliminary P.U.D. Phase 1 Engineering Department Comments 1st Submittal December 16, 1996 * This project has a significant level of complexity and issues to resolve including both off -site and on -site street improvements, street classification and connections, utility and drainage items, etc. before this project should proceed to the Planning and Zoning Board. Soils Report: • All new projects submitted to the City after April of 1996 are subject to the Engineering Department's new standards for soils reports (and final pavement design at the time of construction). The soils report submitted is from 1986. A new soils report, or an updated report, must be submitted in accordance with the new criteria (copy available in the Engineering Department) by revision date - 1/8/97 for the project to continue to be considered for the January P & Z hearing or by/ prior to any revision date thereafter for future P& Z dates. Date: I�,''� .�"r,i Signature b- 11'?rL4 CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY sides of local and collector streets) • Despite efforts to provide street connections within the development itself, the traffic entering and exiting the site is all funneled onto Richard's Lake Way and Richard's Lake Drive. To avoid the overloading of collector streets we see on some existing collectors in the City, a second collector or connector street out to County Road 11 is needed. Similarly, Redsail Place should be extended out to Richard's Lake Road to provide more direct circulation to and from the southern portion of the property. Part of the effort of the new street standards is to provide multiple connections to a development, as well as connections internal to the site, to disperse traffic and provide alternative travel routes. • Due to the scope and scale of this project, it is strongly suggested that a context diagram be prepared to show the surrounding area, transportation network, and how this project is tying in to it (including Hearthfire P.U.D., adjacent county developments and roads). • The graphics of the O.D.P. are unclear as to the classification of the street network proposed. Typically, O.D.P.s show collector streets but not local streets. With the new street standards, it seems appropriate to show the entire network to illustrate the connections being made. However, there must be some distinction (varied line weight ?) to distinguish arterials, minor arterials, collectors, connectors, locals, etc. • Again, without a traffic study, there is no way to evaluate what improvements (besides what the City Code requires) are necessary and when they are triggered The developer probably wants to phase Final P.U.D.s and construction within the Preliminary called Phase 1 as well as phased development of the O.D.P. The traffic study needs to discuss improvements needed in terms of this phasing as well as in terms of overall site buildout. • If a future street aligns with Richard's Lake Way on the east side of County Road 11 as is typical with collector streets, there will probably need to be a combined through and left and a right turn lane. The median/entry feature does not leave room for these improvements in the roadway - Off -site Street Improvement Requirements: • See attached City Code Sections Utility Plans: • Although the City does not require much detail in the way of preliminary utility grading, and drainage plans, the ones that were submitted were very sketchy. 6 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: November 27, 1996 DEPT: Enginering PROJECT: #58-86D Richard's Lake PUD, Phase I - Preliminary PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by: Monday, December 16, 1996 RICHARD'S LAKE P.U.D. - O.D.P. and Preliminary P.U.D. Phase 1 Engineering Department Comments 1st Submittal December 16, 1996 �k This project has a significant level of complexity and issues to resolve including both off -site and on -site street improvements, street classification and connections, utility and drainage items, etc. before this project should proceed to the Planning and Zoning Board. Soils Report: • All new projects submitted to the City after April of 1996 are subject to the Engineering Department's new standards for soils reports (and final pavement design at the time of construction). The soils report submitted is from 1986. A new soils report, or an updated report, must be submitted in accordance with the new criteria (copy available in the Engineering Department) by revision date - 1/8/97 for the project to continue to be considered for the January P & Z hearing or by/ prior to any revision date thereafter for future P& Z dates. Date: Signature 6- kPx�4�1— CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE 0 UTILITY t Lighting Variance Request: • The "variance" request is simply a statement that the project would like a variance to street lighting. It does not explain what variance(s) are proposed, where the variance is proposed to apply, etc. Has there been any discussion of specifics with the Director of Engineering that staff is not aware of ? Whatever is decided with respect to any variance must be resolved before the project can proceed to the P & Z Board. Based on this same type of variance being worked on with the Hearthfire development, the applicant should have some idea of what issues are associated with this type of request and be able to submit at least a proposed lighting plan for review along with an explanation of the reasoning behind the proposed plan. Variance Request Minimum Centerline Radius - Whitesail Cove • See attached response Traffic Study: • No traffic study was received. There are many impacts that need to be assessed before any discussion can take place regarding necessary on -site and off -site street improvements, phasing of improvements, etc. as well as operational issues. Because of the scope of the traffic issues and impacts on this project, the traffic study is a critical element of this submittal. Since it did not come in with the initial submittal, the project will likely experience delays in the review process. * When a traffic study does come in, it must include a breakdown of all proposed streets and their proposed classification based on the criteria (e.g. projected volumes, parking needs, etc) in accordance with the new street standards. Many of the streets as proposed do not meet the functional needs associated with the new street standards. For example, Richard's Lake Drive and Richard's Lake Way must be built to the collector street standard with on -street parking since there are lots that front on the street, a park (especially with proposed soccer and softball fields), multi -family, and commercial uses adjacent to the streets. The same is true for Waxwing Place and Somerset Place - they serve as significant connections with on -street parking needs and/or have more intense land uses adjacent that require a wider cross-section for parking and access. - Be sure to classify Richard's Lake Road and discuss the proposed improvements to that road (developers are obligated to improve both sides of local and collector streets) • Despite efforts to provide street connections within the development itself, the traffic entering and exiting the site is all funneled onto Richard's Lake Way and Richard's Lake Drive. To avoid the overloading of collector streets we see on some existing collectors in the City, a second collector or connector street out to County Road 11 is needed. Similarly, Redsail Place should be extended out to Richard's Lake Road to provide more direct circulation to and from the southern portion of the property. Part of the effort of the new street standards is to provide multiple connections to a development, as well as connections internal to the site, to disperse traffic and provide alternative travel routes. • Due to the scope and scale of this project, it is strongly suggested that a context diagram be prepared to show the surrounding area, transportation network, and how this project is tying in to it (including Hearthfire P.U.D., adjacent county developments and roads). • The graphics of the O.D.P. are unclear as to the classification of the street network proposed. Typically, O.D.P.s show collector streets but not local streets. With the new street standards, it seems appropriate to show the entire network to illustrate the connections being made. However, there must be some distinction (varied line weight ?) to distinguish arterials, minor arterials, collectors, connectors, locals, etc. • Again, without a traffic study, there is no way to evaluate what improvements (besides what the City Code requires) are necessary and when they are triggered. The developer probably wants to phase Final P.U.D.s and construction within the Preliminary called Phase 1 as well as phased development of the O.D.P. The traffic study needs to discuss improvements needed in terms of this phasing as well as in terms of overall site buildout. • If a future street aligns with Richard's Lake Way on the east side of County Road 11 as is typical with collector streets, there will probably need to be a combined through and left and a right turn lane. The median/entry feature does.not leave room for these improvements in the roadway. Off -site Street Improvement Requirements: • See attached City Code Sections Utility Plans: • Although the City does not require much detail in the way of preliminary utility grading, and drainage plans, the ones that were submitted were very sketchy. - No pipe sizes for water and sewer mains are labeled. - The storm drain system is not shown on the utility sheets so it is difficult to identify conflict areas - No street names are shown The improvements proposed along Richard's Lake Road and County Road 11 are not clear. Again, it is difficult to identify potential conflicts between utilities, street improvements, existing features, and/or proposed landscaping. Cannot tell what the intent is for improvements to CR 11 or Richard's Lake Road (r.ow. width, widening, improvements, etc.) - The grading along the proposed detention ponds, and in all other locations, must accommodate the detached sidewalk and at least 2 feet at 2% behind the walk then a 4:1 slope to grade. (Also, be sure all proposed detention and freeboard is outside of the public r.o.w.) - It appears there is rear lot detention proposed. Typically, the City has not allowed rear lot detention except for on a few infill sites. - Show how this project's proposed grading ties into Hearthfire's proposed (and existing) grading. - All site plan comments apply Site Plan: • Proposing stamped, colored concrete crosswalks. Any materials specifications for paving will be reviewed with final P.U.D. plans against standards current at the time of the review. • It is not clear which street cross -sections correspond to which streets. See previous comments regarding street classification. Street classification must be supported by traffic study documentation for all streets. • Remove Note #6 since street do not comply with standards (see variance request) • Since there is already a Richard's Lake Road, having a Richard's Lake Drive and a Richard's Lake Way may not be acceptable to emergency services. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins M- M Current Planning- DATE: November 27, 1996 DEPT: PROJECT: #58-86D Richard's Lake PUD, Phase I - Preliminary PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by: Monday, December 16, 1996 j-7 --I' IV "i Al (4v I optw Date: Signature CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS E3 SITE 0 LANDSCAPE EX UTILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: November 27, l 996 DEPT: Mapping PROTECT: #58-86D Richard's Lake PUD, Phase I - Preliminary PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by: Monday, December 16, 1996 Vl�vt`L Date: Signature CHECK: IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE:4-17-96 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Richard's Lake P.U.D., Phase 1 and O.D.P. PLANNER: Steve Olt O.D.P. I. Richard's Lake Cove cul-de-sac doesn't meet 660' to 2nd point of access criteria for fire/emergency needs. Need to revise layout or possibly create an emergency access road between the 2 c-d-sacs, (or fire sprinkle the homes). 2. Street classification changes made to address Kerrie's comment are good. • PRELIM. SITE and LANDSCAPE PLANS l . Several streets need to be checked for sight distance easements (@final). 2. The trails being dedicated to the City need to be have public pedestrian/bike/equestrian (?) access easements granted to the City instead. The City does not want ownership nor will the City maintain these traits unless Parks and Rec. Dept specifically agrees to assume responsibility. Provide copy of any agreement letters if another City agency accepts responsibility. (( `IA, 4 /� 3. Streetlight needed at Redsail Way And Redsail Court unless emergency services dept's. state street sign is adequately illuminated by surrounding lighting (provide letter of acceptance). • PLAT AND UTILITY PLANS I. Will need to state restrictions on lots encroaching into the 75' and 150' well setbacks. �2. See comments 1 of O.D.P. and 1 and 2 of SITE / LANDSCAPE plans above. 3. Please revise plan date with each submittal and use larger scale on Plat for better clarity / readability. 4. Address easement statements and questions by Final submittal. ****** Address other minor comments on all the Plans ****** Date: Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: t PLAT %� 'fC SITE UTILITY LANDSCAPE pv PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Citv of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richards Lake P.U.D. PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: Wednesday September 2,1998 No Problems Pr ms or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. General Comment; remove reference to revisions in revision block. Revisions are placed after Plans have received approval from City, Districts and etc. 2. Attach off -site roadway plans with this set at next approval. It is all one plan set 3. Need signature blocks for all impacted parties, i.e. Ditch company oil company, districts etc. 4. Remove street designation from all sheets, they are not needed 5. Temporary turn around are needed for all phasing that as only one access point and are in excess of 660 feet in length 6. Revise phasing to better define street and storm water construction. Some phasing does not take into account those items needed for each phase, i.e. Street connections, detention ponds etc. 7. Remove note 8 sheet C3 "compaction", compaction will be per City requirements regardless of district requirements. Typical comment 8. Phasing of utilities needs to be shown and approved by districts 9. Other comments on various sheets through out plan set. 10. Need Cry Rd, I I and Richards Lake Roadway designs adjacent to site Date: 2 S J Signature °i A ^14 �2 PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: PLAT SITE UTILITY \LANDSCAPE ENUINEERING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970)498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 August 26, 1999 Dave Stringer City of Fort Collins - Engineering 281 N. College Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80522 RF,: County Road 11, County Road 50 and County Road 9 Improvements [)car Dave, Thank you for sending us the County Road I I. County Road 50 and County Road 9 Road Improvement Plans. We have reviewed the plans and have redlined comments on the attached plans. In addition to addressing the redline comments, we would appreciate an exhibit that depicts the existing and proposed Right of Way Tines because it is unclear on the plan sets what additional Right of Way is being acquired for the road improvements. We are also uncertain which road sections are being annexed into the City of Fort Collins and therefore, will be maintained by the City of Fort Collins. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on the plans. If there are any questions regarding the above comments or the attached redlines, please call me at 498-5727. Sincerely, / qt- Traci Downs c: file V�rngi IsVvoilAAalaAdemcvAplunchkVcitics�fcollinsVcr11,cr50,eN Pmp.doe REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: July 29, 1999 TO:=Engineering-Paxemerit- PROJECT: #58-86E Richard's Lake PUD, Phase 1 Final Offsite Road Improvements All comments must be received by Dave Stringer no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) The pavement design submitted by Inter -Mountain Engineering will need to be revised to address the hish swell soils as indicated be the swell consolidation tests included in the report. Also the City will need to review the EDLA numbers used in the calculations of the pavement thickness. Date: -�o L _Signature:'40 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ site _ Dmirage Rgort _ Other Utility Redline Utility _ IAndscq PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Citv of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE:10 - 8 - 98 PROJECT: Richards Lake PLANNER: Steve Olt DEPT:Mapping/Drafting ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: October 7, 1998 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Provide new plat language - see attached 2. There is typo in legal description, N '70'34'52"W should be S 70'34'52" W. 3. Boundary closes 4. What is the R.O.W. for Richards Labe Road, Sheet # 3 = 80', Sheet # 5 =75 ` show existing and proposed. 5. How was the South R.O.W. (South of section line) dedicated? Please show reception # and/or how it was dedicated. 6. There are 2 or 3 set pins along the outer boundary without ties, show ties. 7. What separate Tract J from the commercial tract, also the commercial tract needs a letter designation. 8. Off-ste easements need reception numbers 9. Tracts I & H can not be located. 10. The Whiting Petroleum easements can not be located. 11. What is the additional line across tots 58, 45, 46, 43 and 42? 12. There are two Tract N's 13. Check all lot lines, make sure they have dimensions. 14. Line table has errors there appear to be duplication in the number system 15. If you have questions Call Wally Muscot at 970 - 221-6605 n, Date: '�_: i5 ; /:y% Signature`'_ PLEASE SEND)'-20PIES OF MARKED REVISIONS. 0--PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE PROJECT 1 COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 8 - 1_8 - 1999 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richards Lake - off - site PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: ]Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: October 7, 1998 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Sear/Brown plans - need ditch company signatures 2. tJse City Signature block - see attachment Inter - Mountain Plans 3. Same as number 1 above 4. Include detail such as Sear/Brown for mailboxes 5. Provide all on - site and off -site easements prior to final approval by P&Z Board Northern Engineering Plans 6. Add note in large block letters: As approved dated 2-5-99 Date: l �i 1 )1 Signature. PLEAS. S , 1) COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: PLAT ,9, SITE _Aa UTILITY ,EI.LANDSCAPE PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 8/25/99 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richards Lake PUD PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: August 25, 1999 q No Problems l Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Sheet 14 of 105 - Fill existing pipe with flow -fill, entire length of pipe 2. Sheet 35 of 105 - reference detail for Sanitary Sewer insulation over storm sewer and provide detail for this. 3.Indicate Class of stonn Sewer pipe through out plan sheets 4. Provide design information 1000 feet north of project 5. CDOT and 4 foot inlet per City of Fort Collins standards are the only acceptable inlet designs. Remove ,all other reference to Denver designs 6. Show right-of-way width for Richards Lake Road, existing and proposed. 7. Show % x-slope and sidewalk at property line on x-sections S. Remove sidewalk from drivem er curb and gutter section detail, sidewalk is detached 9. Reference Richards Lake Road on plan sheet Date: 9 /a 1` Signature:�,�iL-�-✓ PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: 0_ PLAT SITE UTILITY LANDSCAPE PROJECT irri■ COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE:2-24- 99 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richards Lake PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: Wednesday February 24, 1999 q ,,No Problems Ism Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Add City's general notes (see attached) 2. This project is subject to the Development Construction Permit approved by Council Jan. 1, 1999 3. Add signature blocks for all utility and ditch companies where appropriate 4. Phasing to be determined by City and Developer, may issues impact phases, i.e. Emergency access, storm water etc. 5. Need off -site drainage easements 6. Need to clarify with storm water the oomment about Butterfly valve operation. This will also be addressed in development Agreement if needed 7. Rip Rap areas to be buried and seeded 8. Provide detail of large inlets i.e. 14 foot, 44 foot and etc. 9. Show detail of enhanced cross walks (typical) 10. Show access ramps on street plans (typical) 11. Show and identify all inlets and drainage features on street plans 12. Clean up street plans and delete inappropriate information, or show street intersection grades in blow-up PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collets Current Planni DATE:3 - 8 - 99 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richard's Lake - off site improvements PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Dave Stringer All comments must be received by: February 24, 1999 No Problems LI'Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Provide detail of intersection grades as per City Standard 2. Radii of intersecting streets. 3. Where is design of Richard's Lake road west of County. Rd. 11? 4. Provide design information 1000 feet north of project 5. Minimum grades of gutter .4%, check all gutter grades for compliance 6. Show how eastern portion of County Road 52 matches with proposed construction, include transition lengths 7. General comment: show grading of existing drives to match proposed construction (typ) 8. Show curb,gutter and sidewalk section at Storybrooke and Waterfiel and Bull Run projects and how proposed all fit together 9. Need to provide legals, exhibits and attorney certifications for all slope, construction and drainage easements needed as a result of off -site improvements 10. Provide cross sections every 100 feet of off -site improvements, where are drainage flows going? Appear to be going onto private property 11. Submit a pavement design report for City approval of proposed overlay thickness 12. Extend design to Timberline Road at International Parkway 13. Other comments as redlined on plans Date: 3— '��� Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE iTTTi TTY REVISION 1000MMENT SHEET DATE: February 4, 1999 TO: Engineering /,// �) PROJECT: #58-86E Richard's Lake P.U.D., Phase 1 — Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) i Date: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES Of REVISIONS -Plat site _ Drdmage Rport — Utility _ Redline Uti; _ Landscape vY` Other >EF,rt ,. Alm, Transportation Services Engineering Department City of Fort Collins Mr. Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 (ilea Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538 Re: Richard's Lake P.U.D. Request for Variance from Street Design Criteria Dear h'att: February 17, 1998 This letter is in response to your letter dated February 2, 1998 in which you requested a vmnance from the City's Design and Construction Criteria, Standards and Specifications for Streets, Side\u°alks, Alleys and Other Public Ways (the "Criteria"'. The City's response follows: I.G"_O?..03 Horizontal Radius to the proposed Richard's Lake development one street, Morningstar Drive (errantly called "Pirkside Drive" in vour variance request letter), does iiot meet the minimum allowable center hij,- radius for a Collector street. as specified in Table 2 of the Criteria. Morningstar Drive is designed with a 5')0' radius which is Less than the 610' minimum allowed in the standards. Because the posted speed limit on this street is anticipated to be less than the calculated design speed_ as detailed in your letter, the request for the variance of lesion standard 1.02.03.03 for Morningstar Drive is granted. I hope I have addressed all of your concerns. If you have any questions, feel free to contact my staff and they will direct your concerns on to me. Sincerely, David Stringer, Developmen.': re,cview anager DWS/mjc cc : Scott Price, Bead Sauccnntm. Elizabeth McTifluc, Ste%e Olt. Mike Colev '_S1 North Colle,e Avenue • P.O. Box 530 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-058o - (Q70) 221-6605 / a 1,'3 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planninf DATE: 12-18-97 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Richard's Lake P.U.D., Filing 1 - Final ENGINEER: Ward Stanford PLANNER: Steve Olt SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS • Please separate Site and Landscape Plans. • Corner sight distance easements have been identified on the street plans. Please contact the Developer's engineer for the easement locations and show them on the Landscape plans along with the City's sight distance easement restriction notes. • Add a note on the Site Plan stating the oil well setback restrictions as they pertain to the ability to build on those encroached lots. PLAT • All easements must be clearly shown and defined. With as many existing and somewhat overlapping easements, indicate both lines defining each easement. • All easements being vacated by this plat should state "To be vacated by this Plat". • This Plat is overly congested with necessary data. Please remove all unnecessary lines, paths, access drives (which will disappear upon overlot grading) and all other non -Plat necessary data. Separate Site Plan data from Plat data. • Title the plat "A Plat of Richard's Lake P.U.D., Filing V and remove the word "Final" from Final Plat in the title block area. You can stamp it Final or Prelim during review period, but do not make it a permanent reference, since it is only "a" Plat. • The area being platted on some of the sheets is unclear. Make platted boundaries clear and fade all surrounding "necessary" data and delete all surrounding "unnecessary"data. • Add final Site Plan note (oil well setback) to this Plat. • Please add corner sight distance easements (shown on street plans) and the City's sight distance easement restriction notes to this Plat. • Define all the Tracts purposes under the Notes area of Plat sheet P1, ie: Tract C is dedicated as open space, and a drainage and public access easement (must use words "dedicated" and "easement" when an easement situation). • State each streets classification under/beside the name, ie: Morningstar Drive (collector w/ parking). • All easements to be dedicated by separate document to the public or as an offsite easement for public concerns must be submitted to tie City for acceptance (or copy of executed private easement) at least two weeks prior to final P&Z hearing. • Only provide sheets that have Plat data relevant to Filing One. Do sheets P4, P5, and P9 meet this requirement? DATE: August 11, 1998 TO: Mapping & Drafting PROJECT: #58-86E Richards Lake PUD, Filing One - Final All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 2,1998 1. Tite wa1J, I, vj'e5 cover-"F savhe trio, 11 JI 2, All cur,re5 ineed coo rd Fj cavw�gs and �t StYt WacS ,�.lo�s GrH.}Cc- tING oh STL t•c�� r 0k Co. 1�cl.3$'tl� IA`Sa oK Rickards Lake PA,> S. silee , *'Y — .R,C4a1 �j should be •G�,ay�s. .�, t here q Ye_ Iwo +{^aJs HF" u 11 7• , rr4c4- " N 41eed tAe- bovnd4ri 8. `(lie, VVIa4-c-ti II))vtp- sl,e�� ✓tuwtbers QrC- t-Jrov01,L S0"-7� S/�rcei�Sl. I J1._. I_ L II ,p• All PuLposoci QK4 &)OI � C45P H��N1� O&CA 10 be- I�cq 6b(B � I q I l 1615 % _ I 1 erv;ce.s, �V Rre sTreer t-tomes �o.(�. w;ibi t=�P, S Date: Sipatm: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Pit _ S1, _ Drainage Report _ Oler _ Utility _ Redne Utility _Lands* City of Fort Collins UTILITY PLANS Cover Sheet: • Include standard City General Notes, Benchmark (referenced to the City "Black Bolt Survey"), and the date prepared under the title (update date w/ ea. submittal). • Re -number all sheets, except Plat, consecutively from Cover Sheet and revise the title to say " Utility Plans for Richard's lake P.U.D." Phasing Plan: • Some how, this development must show how the utilities and streets will be phased so we can verify each phase is capable of functioning on its own, that is, to function independently of the remaining undeveloped phases. Any liveable area must have two points of access, stormwater must be handled without detriment to others, etc. these things we have to verify that they exist in any part of a development especially phased ones. Overall Utility Plans: • Suggestion: possibly show whole phases on the utility plan sheets with phasing info on each; possibly adding phase numbers to the title, ie: "Utility Plan - Phases 1 thru 4". If do not use suggestion or your own methods, show phase lines on each sheet. • Remove all irrelevant lines, ie: existing paths and roads that will be graded over for lots. • Please show the stormwater system, all crosspans, street names and any other utility components. • Show "Type III barricades at all short dead ends and public turn -a -rounds at others. • Is there a utility easement on the South side of Richard's Lake Rd. covering the 4" water line ? If yes show on plat and utility plans; if private show anyway and provide copy of the easement to the City. If no, need to provide. Onsite Street Plans: • Please provide this data for all streets: - Both flowline profiles and full descriptive data to PCR of intersecting street. - Intersection data per City detail D-1S. - Labeled PCR data (stationing and elev). - Curve table with arc length, bearing, delta, chord length, tangent and radius data. - True lengths of flowline line segments (by table or on profiles, clearly). - Detail drawing w/ descriptive data, of anything differing from City standards. - Show and label all elements in the street prism, ie: inlets, crosspans, etc.. - State width of all sidewalks, ie: "proposed 5' sidewalk". - Fade all data not relevant to describing the street elements and related components. - State classification, r-o-w and flowline width, of each street under the street name. - Provide caul -de -sac data per City detail D-5 for each c-d-sac (see comments on c-d-sac detail, sht. R19, for recent changes). - Label all street width transitions by stationing and description. - Show "Type III" barricades at all stub streets and public turn -a -rounds at all long incomplete streets. - Show phase lines and temp. turn -a -rounds or "Type III" barricades at same. - Use matc:hlines to continue street plan and profile views - Show PCR to intersecting street PCR slopes, stationing and elev's on flowline profiles ( if a street being profiled is intersected by another street do not show the PCR-PCR data, show data of flowline going thru intersection. If profiled street intersects another street at the profiled streets ends, do show data from the profiled street PCR to intersected street PCR; see sheet R3). - Corner sight distance easements. - All paths leading to a street crossing should be done at the intersection corners (where people expect to find people crossing the streets) with the exception of the raised crosswalk on Morningstar Drive. Paths do not have to lead to the corners (preferable) but no ramps shall be allowed at those mid -block locations to discourage unexpected pedestrian crossings. 3 �3 - Provide intersection data for each intersection, once, per City detail D-18 or D-19. • General - Provide Details and cross -sections for both entrance medians. - Design street approach grades at intersections to City standards. - Provide only one cross -street handicap ramp at "T" intersections. - Decide correct name for Sailor's Cove or Sailor's Court (sht RI, R7), and Quail Cove (RI, R11). • Redsail Place needs to be designed as a Connector Street not a Residential Local street . • Minimum curve radius' for Morningstar Drive is 610'. Please revise. Smooth out the profile as shown on sheet R10. • Show sight distance easement (will allow reduced visual length of 225', if you do an engineering evaluation proving the 225' visual length provides roughly same time due to expected reduced speeds on this curvy street. • Provide these details on sheet R19 - City sidewalk ramp details for each intersection type. - City street intersection approach detail D-18 and/or D-19. - Mid -block ramp details. - Raised x-walk details per City Traffic Dept (Dan Holland) criteria. Will need to verify acceptance of requested raised x-walk on Somerset Place with Eric Bracke (Traffic Dept) and Kathleen Reavis (Transportation planning). - Asphalt paving detail at crosspans, City detail D-25. - Pedestrian / bike path connection detail D-4. • Remove all pavement section references. • Revise details as requested on R19. ************* SEE OTHER COMMENTS THROUGHOUT PLAN SET ************** Signature �_i . Date /--/9-� 5;7 Please provide listed rev ed plans upon next submittal: Site, Landscape, Plat, Utility PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: November 11, 1997 TO: Engineering Pvmnt PROJECT: #58-86E Richard's Lake P.U.D., Phase I (LDGS) Final All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, December 10,1997 Sub -drains should be installed and shown on the utility plans for streets with shallow bedrock. As indicated in the areas were boring numbers 8, 9 and 10 were taken. Date: ! L ?_ q _Y % Signature:(/,� CHECK HERE T YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ Sk _ OraV Report _ Olber My _ Redline Ugly — La- s City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: November 11, 1997 TO: Mapping PROJECT: #58-86E Richard's Lake P.U.D., Phase I (LDGS) Final All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Z11 Wednesday, December 10, 1997 p P; 1 62 rP7 T, f Jr rz Date: L) h< ____Signature: CHECK IBE F YOU WH TO RECEIVE COPES OF REVISIONS —PW 4hNe Rqft O&T WUM U9V Ri" Ufirt City of Fort Collins A REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: April 30, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Richard's Lake, First Filing PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Michael Coley Utility Plans: • Include pdan and profile sheets for Richard's Lake Road. k 1?ntitic the project "Filing" one. not "phase" one. • Speedy which parcels tracts are to be dedicated and maintained by the HOA. i City standards require 15' utility easements along all minor arterials. -i- Include all proposed uses in your tracts (i.e. Drainage and utility easement) -I: It is not necessary to provide casements within the ROW. :i= Pedestrian connections need to he properly labeled on the plat. =i Basements that are not within the platted boundary need to be dedicated by seperate document. • The minimum tangent length at an intersection is 100'. • If the power lines going through the site are to he relocated. than the existing casement should be vacated. Y• Label sight distance easements. i Please show all casements on overall utility plans. .1: Install Type 3 barricades at all dead ends. Oflsite improvements: :, a 15' utility easement is needed along Co. Rd. 1 1. i Provide a right turn lane into Morningstar from the North. s Provide a Ieft turn lane onto Co. Rd. 52 from the North. .;. County Road 11 needs to be built to minor arterial standards along frontage. * Need three lanes at Co. Rd. 50 (min. 36' *x See redline plans for additional comments r* Date. 00i��, � Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions _Plat _ Site _XUtility _Landscape Landmark ENGINEERING Ltd. E n g i n e e r s • P l a n n e r s • S u r v e y o r s • A r c h i t e c t s • G e o t e c It n i c a l April 28, 2005 Project No. COVERI-4J3A-01-Al-105 Fort Collins Zoning Board of Appeals Fort Collins Zoning Department 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 ATTN: s RE: Change to Utility and Drainage Easement Lot 11, Cove at Richard's Lake To Whom it May Concern, It is requested that the Utility and Drainage Easement along the Westerly side of Lot 11 be adjusted from six feet wide down to four feet wide. The reason for the request is the foundation of the building has been built and is encroaching into the easement. Currently, the building is not in conflict with any utilities along the lot line and the remaining four feet is sufficient for subsequent utilities. The easement will be sufficient to cant' the runoff from the two lots to the street. Attached are the rational method calculations for this area. The contributory area to the lot line is approximately 0.10 acres. The runoff coefficient for Medium Density Planned Residential District (R-M-P) is 0.60. The intensity of the 100-year storm (using a time of concentration of 10 minutes) is 7.20 in/hr. The runoff expected along the lot line during the 100-year storm, is 0.4 ft'/s. The swale along the lot line will have a slope of 2.5% (per the grading plan). The depth of flow within the swale, for 0.4 ft'/s, is 0.25 feet. Using a side slope of 4:1, the spread of the flow will be approximately two feet (one foot on each side of the lot line). We appreciate your time and consideration in the review of the request. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Landmark Engineering, Ltd. TA Brian J. Hailey, PE 3 fly t =r 3521 West E i s ea It o w e r Boulevard Loveland, Colorado 80537 Loveland (970) 667-6286 Fax (970) 667-6298 Metro (303) 629-7124 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 6, 2005 TO: Aimee Jensen, Deputy City Clerk FROM: Sheri Wamhoff, Development Review Manager RE: PZ05-07 Richards Lake Easement Vacation Agenda Date: June 16, 2005 Grantor: City of Fort Collins Grantee: The Cove at Richards Lake, LLC, 3000 Pearl St, Suite 100, Boulder, Co 80301 Location: Lot 11 of Richard's Lake PUD, located north of Richards Lake Rd and west of Tumberry Rd Description: Vacation of a portion of 2 feet of the 6 foot sidelot utility and drainage easement on Lot 11, Richard's Lake PUD Account Number: Check #3027 for $16.00 (3 sheets) for recording purposes) Monetary consideration: $0.00 Legal Description: S '/2 of Section 30, T 8 N, R 68 W Have we received other documents or will we be getting more documents in the future related to this one? Yes Project Name? Richards Lake PUD Filing One cc: ITEM NO. 2 LOA MEETING DATE 6/16/05 STAFF Cheri Wamhnff 6!!�!S City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Resolution PZ05-07: Vacation of 2 feet of a 6 foot sidelot utility and drainage easement on Lot 11 of Richard's Lake PUD, Filing One, located north of Richards Lake Road and west of Turnberry Road. APPLICANT: Landmark Engineering Ltd 3521 West Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Co 80537 OWNER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate 2 feet of a 6 foot sidelot utility and drainage easement on Lot 11 of Richard's Lake PUD, Filing One, located north of Richards Lake Road and west of Turnberry Road. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution PZ05-07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Owner has requested the vacation of 2 feet of a 6 foot sidelot utility and drainage easement on Lot 11 of Richard's Lake PUD, Filing One, because the house that was constructed extends into the easement. The utility companies have been contacted and have no problems with the proposed vacation. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. PO. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970)221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT RESOLUTION NO. PZ05-07 OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS VACATING 2 FEET OF A 6 FOOT SIDELOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON LOT 11 OF RICHARD'S LAKE PUD WHEREAS, Section 2-353 (4) of the Code of the City of Fort Collins authorizes the Planning and Zoning Board to vacate certain easements, by resolution or by approval of replats containing notation of such vacation; and WHEREAS, the Owner has requested that the City vacate 2 feet of a 6 foot sidelot utility and drainage easement on Lot 11 of Richard's Lake PUD, which proposed vacation is more particularly described on Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the vacation request has been reviewed and approved by the pertinent City and private utilities, and they report no objections. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Fort Collins that 2 feet of a 6 foot sidelot utility and drainage easement on Lot 11 of Richard's Lake PUD, Filing One, which easement is more particularly described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby vacated. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Fort Collins held this 16'h day of June A.D. 2005. Chairman ATTEST: Secretary EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The portion of Utility and Drainage Easement hereby vacated, situated in Larimer County, Colorado, is described as follows: Legal Description of a portion of a Utility and Drainage Easement on, over and across a portion of Lot 11, Richard's Lake PUD, Filing One, City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado according to the plat on file in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of said County being more particularly described as follows; beginning at the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence along the Westerly line of said Lot 1 North 30052'58"West 8.87 feet; thence departing said Westerly line North 59007'02"East 4.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 30°52'58" West 79.27 feet; thence South 67135'13" East 3.35 feet; thence South 30052'58" East 76.75 feet to a point on the Northerly line of a 9-foot Utility and Drainage Easement said point being a point on a curve concave to the Southeast having a central angle of 1 155'57"and a radius of 59.50 feet; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve and along said 9-foot Utility and Drainage Easement 2.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Paul A. Hernandez, a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Colorado do hereby certify that this Legal Description was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that it is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. It is not the result of a field survey nor should it be construed as a monumented survey by this office. Landmark Engineering, Ltd. -32 Paul A. Hernandez Colo. L.S. 32829 Sheet 1 of 2 Cc:vsU2�3 � �t,7G/�c, Wi« Nc3�o ;v �6 VACATION OF EASEMENT EXHIBIT MAP LOT 11, RICHARD'S LAKE P.U.D., FILING ONE N 1521.14,, rI/S67*35'13"E unury 5� 5 \ EASEMENTNAINAC 76,21PpRS'13"E' / I � f Exhibit "A" A = 34'48'25" R = 50,50' L = 30.68' BEAMREACH PLACE R=59.50 1 L=2.01 Tan=1.00 a1'55'57" N59'07'02"E 4.00' PUTTHD NORTH V Legal description: LOT 11, RICHARD'S LAKE P.U.D., FILING ONE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO. Property Address: 1508 BEAMREACH PLACE Easement information from recorded plat provided by client unless otherwise noted. This Exhibit Map is for the vacation of a portion of on existing easement. It does not represent a field survey nor should It be construed as a monumented land survey by this office. Landmark Ell By. Paul A. h Colo. L.S. sheet 2 of 2 r._. �1....dti TE: VACATION OF EASEMENT EXHIBIT MAP ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS CLIENT: THE COVE ® RICHARDS LAKE 3521 Ror Ul BNd., Im\Nnd, CN9r96 83557 (970) 6V-6256 O,m,r (303) 629-7124 Fax (970) 667-6298 SCALE: "— 20' DATE: 5/17/051PROJI.COVER1 4J3A01—A1 EASEMENT VACATION E DOUGLAS RD i Li l - 11 1508 Beamreach Place a ry�. 7 l i ii J 1-TIi�lr�.:� ��< f yti t a' 1 _. i t_'-f-� �� i t �L1 , i ' LIILI7 — —, \ _ _. ' � ...- � - — - •--. � 1__ PZ05-07 Richard's Lake, 1st Filing, Lot 11 Vicinity Map May 23, 2005 N A REVISION s COMMENT SHEET DATE: March 23, 1998 TO: Mapping 56+ t a� '— PROJECT: #58-86E Richard's Lake P.U.D., Phase I - (LDGS) Final All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: ''�� Wednesday, April 8,1998 J H(. ?CA-r C (Cojej U✓T CA LC VLA T" I (�.�f /HG/LC-J l loZ3 T- VS jf 14 OJK �o✓/n/pA2i MUNdI��N J MUJT %�Cr /,< SG/2I13rD ��L'_ kJ@ iCa �lo �� S�2�E bite bi 1'e Plg �v prkc,ls 7�/ocr( CUkLer L�od5 cu�c'S, does blaf' agree w� GK1PZ�iG Sc-a �e iS I � ca i,er_�, J ��I elIse_ i_, Ine_ blew �C'r��te ✓ jz/Lj) I Date: Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Pit _ Sk. _ NW Report _ Odier _ UdV _ Rein Ut I4 _ lan&* X A1� e4�P iM E'� �G7oWh y?EP_� A V1Q O-e- eT? u4h /� II C G II l a ct GF. w�c�;e I� t - La 00 Lt srtc6 Ci 1 y I rt ��- ` G� �Lr�P+ 9(: 4UCC-S PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planninl DATE: 12-18-97 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Richard's Lake P.U.D., Filing 1 - Final ENGINEER: Ward Stanford PLANNER: Steve Olt SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS • Please separate Site and Landscape Plans. • Corner sight distance easements have been identified on the street plans. Please contact the Developer's engineer for the easement locations and show them on the Landscape plans along with the City's sight distance easement restriction notes. • Add a note on the Site Plan stating the oil well setback restrictions as they pertain to the ability to build on those encroached lots. PLAT • All easements must be clearly shown and defined. With as many existing and somewhat overlapping easements, indicate both lines defining each easement. • All easements being vacated by this plat should state "To be vacated by this Plat". • This Plat is overly congested with necessary data. Please remove all unnecessary lines, paths, access drives (which will disappear upon overlot grading) and all other non -Plat necessary data. Separate Site Plan data from Plat data. • Title the plat "A Plat of Richard's Lake P.U.D., Filing 1" and remove the word "Final" from Final Plat in the title block area. You can stamp it Final or Prelim during review period, but do not make it a permanent reference, since it is only "a" Plat. • The area being platted on some of the sheets is unclear. Make platted boundaries clear and fade all surrounding "necessary" data and delete all surrounding "unnecessary"data. • Add final Site Plan note (oil well setback) to this Plat. • Please add comer sight distance easements (shown on street plans) and the City's sight distance easement restriction notes to this Plat. • Define all the Tracts purposes under the Notes area of Plat sheet P1, ie: Tract C is dedicated as open space, and a drainage and public access easement (must use words "dedicated" and "easement" when an easement situation). • State each streets classification under/beside the name, ie: Morningstar Drive (collector w/ parking). • All easements to be dedicated by separate document to the public or as an offsite easement for public concerns must be submitted to the City for acceptance (or copy of executed private easement) at least two weeks prior to final P&Z hearing. • Only provide sheets that have Plat data relevant to Filing One. Do sheets P4, P5, and P9 meet this requirement? � 0�3 UTILITY PLANS Cover Sheet: • Include standard City General Notes, Benchmark (referenced to the City "Black Bolt Survey"), and the date prepared under the title (update date w/ ea. submittal). • Re -number all sheets, except Plat, consecutively from Cover Sheet and revise the title to say " Utility Plans for Richard's lake P.U.D." Phasing Plan: • Some how, this development must show how the utilities and streets will be phased so we can verify each phase is capable of functioning on its own, that is, to function independently of the remaining undeveloped phases. Any liveable area must have two points of access, stormwater must be handled without detriment to others, etc. these things we have to verify that they exist in any part of a development especially phased ones. Overall Utility Plans: • Suggestion: possibly show whole phases on the utility plan sheets with phasing info on each; possibly adding phase numbers to the title, ie: "Utility Plan - Phases I thru 4". If do not use suggestion or your own methods, show phase lines on each sheet. • Remove all irrelevant lines, ie: existing paths and roads that will be graded over for lots. • Please show the stormwater system, all crosspans, street names and any other utility components. • Show "Type III barricades at all short dead ends and public turn -a -rounds at others. • Is there a utility easement on the South side of Richard's Lake Rd. covering the 4" water line ? If yes show on plat and utility plans; if private show anyway and provide copy of the easement to the City. If no, need to provide. Onsite Street Plans: • Please provide this data for all streets: - Both flowline profiles and full descriptive data to PCR of intersecting street. - Intersection data per City detail D-18. - Labeled PCR data (stationing and elev). - Curve table with arc length, bearing, delta, chord length, tangent and radius data. - True lengths of flowline line segments (by table or on profiles, clearly). - Detail drawing w/ descriptive data, of anything differing from City standards. - Show and label all elements in the street prism, ie: inlets, crosspans, etc.. - State width of all sidewalks, ie: "proposed 5' sidewalk". - Fade all data not relevant to describing the street elements and related components. - State classification, r-o-w and flowline width, of each street under the street name. - Provide cul-de-sac data per City detail D-5 for each c-d-sac (see comments on c-d-sac detail, sht. R19, for recent changes). - Label all street width transitions by stationing and description. - Show "Type III" barricades at all stub streets and public turn -a -rounds at all long incomplete streets. - Show phase lines and temp. tum-a-rounds or "Type III" barricades at same. - Use matchlines to continue street plan and profile views - Show PCR to intersecting street PCR slopes, stationing and elev's on flowline profiles ( if a street being profiled is intersected by another street do not show the PCR-PCR data, show data of flowline going thru intersection. If profiled street intersects another street at the profiled streets ends, do show data from the profiled street PCR to intersected street PCR; see sheet R3). - Corner sight distance easements. - All paths leading to a street crossing should be done at the intersection corners (where people expect to find people crossing the streets) with the exception of the raised crosswalk on Morningstar Drive. Paths do not have to lead to the comers (preferable) but no ramps shall be allowed at those mid -block locations to discourage unexpected pedestrian crossings.