The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutREGISTRY RIDGE PUD SECOND - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-06-16REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 7, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge PUD, 2lid Filing - LDGS All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: November 29, 2000 ❑ N_ omment ❑Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Registry Ridge PUD. Second filing December 7, 2000 Make the changes shown and mylars can be submitted. We need the revisions to the first filing for the utility connections submitted at the same time or prior to this submittal. Utility Plans 1. All of the utilities within the streets (excluding Enter -prize) are shown as existing. The first filing plans have not been modified to add these service connections in. This needs to be done. Any connections in these streets that have to be done alter the street is paved will require the oveilav of the entire street. Plan for this or get all of the utility stubs and connections on the first tiling plans. approved and in before the streets out there are paved. We need these revision submitted reviewed and approved before this plan set can be approved. 2. Need to show the bike lane,' parking lime striping that needs to be done with this project. it is only this line that is to be striped. I have shown it on the plan and profile sheet. 3. Make changes to the Enhanced crosswalk detail as shown. 4. Fill out and return "information for development agreement sheet" and I will start the DA upon receipt. 5. 1 have also attached a De% lopement Construction Permit Application. This will need to be filled out and returned before a development construction permit meeting can be held. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this process. Signature� Date: Please send copies of marked revisions _Plat _Site _Utility _Landscape ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS s, City of Fort Collins PROJECT (MAMS COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planninl7 DATE: January 20, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge P.U.D., 2nd Filing — Preliminary/Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: February 16, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference The Soils report dated June 1995 will need to be updated. The report was prepared under our old standards and test procedures have changed. The report indicates high swell soils on part of the site. A mitigation plan should be submitted prior to any construction. Signature CHECK HERE 1F YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report Other __Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of rut Callins Current Planninti DATE: January 20, 2000 TO: Street Oversizing PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge P.U.D., 2nd Filing — Preliminary/Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting,: February 16, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference �_ / 7 CC2 a CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 7, 2000 TO: Tech Svs PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge PUD, 2nd Filing - LDGS All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: SL November 29, 2000 ❑ No Comment ElProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** VS G F 1 00 d AT- J. LaT N 7S fZ Trle '46 rTtoj �7P—AA,T« Date: Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS U'lat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape rp REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 6, 2000 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge PUD, 2nd Filing, Prelim/Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 26, 2000 1-1 No Cornment -Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" Registry Ridge PUD, Second filing sheet 1 of 2 October 3, 2000 Utility Plans 1. Update general note 45 2. All of the utilities within the streets (excluding Enterprize) are shown as existing. The first filing plans have not been modified to add these service connections in. This needs to be done. Any connections in these streets that have to be done after the street is paved will require the overlay of the entire street. Plan for this or get all of the utility stubs and connections on the first filing plans, approved and in before the streets out there are paved. 3. The south crosswalk does need to be an enhanced x-walk as it is adjacent to the commercial area. Please show as enhanced and provide enhanced x-walk details. 4. Showing some utilities going thru the building envelopes. Need to check with the utility that you are showing doing such to determine if this is acceptable. PSCO was routed so hopefully they will comment on this. May still want to verify with them before: you try to construct it that way. L&P was not routed the plans so please check with them. 5. The building envelope for the retail site differs from that shown on the site plan. 6. Have indicated that the crown transition for Enterprize Drive at each intersection is 16 feet. This does not meet min requirements, per detail D-19 min transition length is 30 feet. Please adjust transitions and provide elevations at the transition point. 7. On the street intersection details you have referenced the replacing concrete pavement detail - this detail does not contain the dowel detail. Change the reference and provide the detail. 8. Provide the Enhanced crosswalk details. 9. Make changes to the ramp details as shown. 10. See plans for additional comments. Date. Signature:_ = HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEVE COPIES OF REV= _ Plat site _ Drainage Report _ Other _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape Registry Ridge PUD, Second filing sheet 2 of 2 October 3, 2000 Plat 1. Provide a place for district signatures. You are vacating one of their easements on the plat and although you speak of dedication of additional easements to them on the plat there are no easements that are indicated that they are for the district. 2. Checking on some additional language that you have added to the statements with the attorney office. 3. Add the additional paragraph to the repair guarantee. And update the notice of other documents. 4. Provide and show a 9 foot utility easement adjacent to Enterprise Drive and the utility easement adjacent to all other streets. If don't wish to do that then need to show that you are meeting this dimension in all locations. Show that you have 9 feet from the property line to the building envelope. 5. The building envelope 12 is shown differently on the site plan. Site Plan 1. Show how you are going to strip the loading zone/ fire lane area on this plan. Need to be striped out or have Fire lane No Parking painted on the pavement. This needs to be shown on the site plan. 2. Building envelope shown for the retail site doesn't match that shown on the plat or the utility plans. 3. Showing some utilities going thru the building envelopes. Need to check with the utility that you are showing going thru the building envelope to determine if this is acceptable. PSCO was routed so hopefully they will comment on this. May still want to verify with them before you try to construct it that way. L&P was not routed the plans so please check with them. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: Sepl:ember 6, 2000 TO: Tech Svs PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge PUD, 2nd Filing, Prelim/Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 26, 2000 El No Continent Sttz a- oProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" L 1 NIA. Sovri-t i tN a SOl.tO l..tN� � Date: CHEa IiERE IF YOU WISH T t Plat Site Utifity _ Redline Utility 6F 3Vl 0 �'hV. ippeA✓ZSTU -ltf -- S.)=�. Gol(iyS �4sew Ph� iS �00 Drainage Report _ Other _ Landscape Fort REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: June 1, 2000 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge P.U.D., 2nd Filing — Preliminary/Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** o l�l Tf ,4ci 5 ) TTHi?t� !� �2AINC ,4N _Rl)IL.OINI C /ESL at er�i S A /D/z ,I / ti -4 c--2 0 THE 7-YL�c-rrs ccl N��r-f Lt1 H bc, ul �- Nc a v3 pr f Ati ( A NIT h /4c-so- Date: Signature:_ CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS X Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins, Current Planning DATE: January 20, 2000 PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Preliminary/Final TO: Engineering Ridge P.U.D., 2" Filing — (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting;: February 16, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Registry Ridge PUD, Second filing (sheet 1 of 2) February 15, 2000 Utility Plans 1. The traffic volumes on Enterprize Drive are too great for it to be a Residential local street. This street needs to be a Commercial Local Street. 2. Make changes to the general notes and shown. 3. Provide concrete to the property line at all access drives. 4, Provide the radius being proposed for the curb returns as well as the street alignment curve data. 5. Can not direct drainage across a walkway sidewalk area. The driveways that have a pan down the center need to direct the flow to one curb line or the other before it enters the row. 6. Add note to the overall utility plans — Patching of existing streets to be done per the City's Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines. FYI on Vhis,t cutting into an existing so would street is put going the utility be eypen ive.andsmay require he overlay of the entire wind re Y Y before the street is built. That would require these plans to be approved and a DCP issued before the street is built or the existing plans revised and the inspection fees paid at that time. 7. Provide elevations at the intersections in accordance with details D-18 and D-19. 8. Provide the grades being tied into for the street design. 9. Grade breaks greater than the .4% allowed is being shown on the profile. 10 drivesthatthe dofollowing not wrap around thePedestrian drive. ramp De Detail D detail19 or prov de the t ansittiion lengths on the intersection details with the elevations. Detached walk midblock ramp detail - it. See additional comments on the details and make changes as noted. Plat 1. Note 42 does not work. We need to know where the buildings are located and the easements are to be. 2. Provide sight distance easement restrictions. 3. The row needs to be 66 feet. (continued on next page) A n Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU ZSH TO REC E COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat ,,)<Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility Redline Utility oCLandscape esty°eF�°tom Registry Ridge PUD, Second filing (sheet 2 of 2) February 15, 2000 Site Plan 1. Traffic volumes are too great for Enterprize Drive to be a ;Zesidential Local Street. 2. Building envelopes are not shown on the plat, but as shown on the site plan several buildings envelopes are shown within the easements. Building envelopes can not encroa::h into easements. 3. Need to provide sidewalk connections from the C-store, r tail and the daycare out to the streets. 4. Eliminate the loading zone areas. These serve no nurposr and will become problem parking areas. Extend the sidewalk through this area and tie the sidewalk system to cite street. It is not acceptable to direct the pedestrians down the driveway. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannina DATE: January 20, 2000 TO: Mapping/Drafting PROJECT: #32-95F Registry Ridge P.U.D., 2nd Filing — Preliminary/Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: February 16, 2000 velocez Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference /, j�CcolCDin/G !o T/�E 111CiNl1V Mela 77-/15 104aPE2TY i 5 iN 7_,MJ Z6,9 tom/, Z, f�jounll7ReY c£�,QL CLOSE•?C �ANio iu i Fs i ircr� L(E6A<_ 3. Tr1�12�� I�c-Anil �tL7/I vcss M�sSin� lJd/I r/ iw6 12a�r t [ `f ��Civc_A-v1 o � j 1'?l� Ji2�S (�� AT p]ZuP� YLi) �ti rJa _ (C rDT6 S`�CT10�� 1 iv�rl2oc� . 5. r IL ��uT(i 2s ! I�fICTs 4--D (AJIL� �Ur A(,Lec.v �rvy IJv 1N ��C4-U�Scs Titer T24cr1 �•2� Ac� U7-iCLr' �SYrlisl Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Flat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape