The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutREGISTRY RIDGE PUD THIRD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-06-16DATE: August 24, 2000 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge, Yd Filing, Final PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: September 13, 2000 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Utility: 1. In general, it appears that the location of the pedestrian paths in relation to storm drainage improvements at the cul-de-sacs were improved with this resubmittal (see following comment). However, because the space still appears tight, a "blowup" of each area should be provided in each instance to assure that the design of the access ramps/storm improvements can "fit" in the given area without a short transition for the access ramp. 2. Additional easement width needs to be provided for the pedestrian paths (minimum 2') to ensure that the sidewalk is not flush with a property line without an easement for maintenance purposes (for Coral Sea Court, Tang Court, Wasp Court, and Sea Wolf Court.) 3. The location of driveways must be physically separated from the pedestrian trails shown at the cul- de-sacs. 4. The location of the catch basin inlet on Sea Wolf Court is still in conflict with the pedestrian access ramp. The catch basin cannot be located within the design for the access ramp as it either cuts short the transition or cannot be physically built. This design needs to be relooked at. While this issue should not be worth preventing the project from going to a hearing, the utility plans will not be approved without this design being corrected. Also note that this design causes a storm drainage line to be flush with a property line, without a necessary easement for maintenance on one side - provide additional easement width, either widen the tract or place an easement internal to lot 172. 5. Be aware that the building envelope on lot 148 encroaches into the sight distance easement. 6. The General Notes need to be modified as redlined. In addition, revise Note 11 and add an additional note as follows: Prior to final inspection and acceptance by The City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must be submitted to and approved by the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stonnwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of additional building permits to those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement. (additional note) The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for any damages or injuries sustained in this Date: September 20.2000 Signature: -- PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISTONS 10 Plat 0 Site 10 Utility El Landscape ❑ I -dkeport ❑ NO COMMrNTS-SUBMIT MYLARS REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 11, 2000 TO: Eng. Pavement PROJECT: #Registry Ridge PUD, Third Filing, — FINAL (LUC) A11 comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, February 2, 2000 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" Date: �_ '_ _ "�-, Signature CHICK HhKt IV YUU W16H IU KECEIVE UUMN Ur tUMUM Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ of mty _ Redline Utility _ Landscape REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 2, 1999 TO: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge PUD, 3rd Filing Final (i DGs) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, October 6, 1999 ❑ No Comment T;�Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Utility Plans • A variance needs to be submitted for the use of traffic circles, as they are not in our design standards. A design for the traffic circle should be submitted to show that it can accommodate an SU-30 vehicle. • Please provide additional spot elevations around the inner traffic circle to verify the 2% cross -slope. Slope around intersections should not exceed 4% and should remain at or just above 2%. • Note that there are areas where the elevations on the plan do not match the elevations on the profile. • Note the modification to the General Notes • The Index should note more specifically which streets are a part of the striping plan. • Provide evidence of securement of all off -site easements prior to going to the Board. • Provide offshe design for Bon Homme Richard Drive for at least 200 feet. • Traffic circle design should be coordinated with the Traffic Engineer, Transportation Planning and Poudre Fire Authority. • Provide an update the preliminary soils report (note our criteria has been updated since the submittal.) • Will this development be phased? If so, please provide a phasing plan. Plat Map • Note the enclosed revised Plat Language and include it on future submittals. • Please label the sight distance easements on the plat_ Replace all occurrences of Director of Engineering with City Engineer. Date:—' Signature: —� Please send copies of marked revisions fat k ca tility Landscape ❑ NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 2, 1999 TO: Mapping PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge PUD, -3 d Filing Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September October 6, 1999 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) G �/'�akR�1^u c. 5 P(A r Ccu; L7,T �uv WA-2. T-H& EA-s t.lrvcr Cg� �4'ki -DcrTc—'-miN��o /763o /f/6 J�o✓, r C/N� (�� % % /fcr L it � Llnl� LV �Z S� ��4J F/46 ^r t�T'/t �cTjGYGyr �.v ? / �'— /HF Z('' / 12c- MISS/N�j AAl o/0/1, (AJ/Z6 i /PtlA0 WT 6JAI / al I/au2 b �. u5 /3E/'�2Ia� � l7isTflt�c�s, — Ii y /-/EEo /Aldo ' /7/A) A,o j Trtu t) /'9 r, OFF ff/TJ I�ILrN'T N��sc�� cc�2�nf �rJ�� 4Lw Lm.IC� ilj L��cz�� .A1CScj T�j LC,- t-c, t 7- �lJo b'1- /-L) �o m &(_hVo,4, iD, s ; ,a 16f- j Alt l � ON�� 2 '0,_,1+c 6 - 2l)c Arcs /S Date: Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Ok _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ landscape Na t A7 � /JC'4«s, Lc�6.gc- /s '�i V671Z REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 2, 1999 TO: Eng. Pavement PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge PUD, 3rd Filing Final (LDGS) Date: All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September October 6, 1999 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) / C) -4,9 -`1'g CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ site _ Drainage Report _ Other Uility _ Redline Utility — Landscape PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: July 17, 1997 DEPT: Eng Pvmnt PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge, 3rd Filing (LDGS) Final PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received no Later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, August 13, 1997 Yo Date: "L —Signature:_�T� —' CHECK HERE IF YOU UH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ Site _ Drinage Report _ Otler "�— U lllt _ Rdc U61iV _ Iafldscax City of Fort Colii u PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: July 17, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge, 3rd Filing (LDGS) Final PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, August 13, 1997 Registry Ridge PUD, Third Filing August 24, 1997 Site/Landscape Plan Show the sight distance easements. • Show the handicap ramps. Path that approaches Bon Homme Richard Drive between lots 131 and 132 should not intersect at the middle of the intersection, but go to one side where the handicap ramp is located. Add the following note: Landscaping placed in medians/ traffic circles shall conform to the sight distance restrictions as provide on the plat. Plat • Indicate who is to own and maintain Tracts. Add the following note to the plat: All landscaping placed in median/traffic circles within the Right -of Way shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association. Show the necessary sight distance easements and provide the following notes: SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT RESTRICTIONS THE AREA WITHIN SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS IS RESTRICTED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1, FENCES SHALL NOT EXCEED 42" IN HEIGHT AND SHALL BE OF OPEN DESIGN. IF FENCES EXCEED 32" IN HEIGHT, THEY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SPLIT RAIL WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 12'' BETWEEN HORIZONTAL MEMBERS. 2. BERMS, HEDGES, AND SHRUBS SHALL NOT EXCEED 32" IN HEIGHT. 3. TREE PLANING SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO DECIDUOUS TREES ONLY. THE LOWEST BRANCH OF ANY TREE SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 12" FROM GRADE n I mucd- nmrext- CHECK IIERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS PW Site _ Ihainage ReP _ Oler r Unity - Redgne Unity Landscape c ty or Fo, coutn5 Registry Ridge PUD, Third Filing (page 2 of 2) August 24, 1997 • Provide labels for the easements on the plans and indicate row widths. • If the Tracts are not utility easements than utility easements need to be continued across the tracts to provide for utility connections. Utility Plans • Any off site easements that are necessary - letter of intent is need prior to the project going to the Board and all final easements will be needed prior to the final signing of the utility plans. • A variance request is needed for the traffic circle. Provide a letter requesting the variance along with diagrams for the traffic circle showing that it will accommodate a SU-30 vehicle. • General notes should be modified as indicated. • Path that approaches Bon Homme Richard Drive between lots 131 and 132 should not intersect at the middle of the intersection, but go to one side where the handicap ramp is located. • Sight distance easements need to be placed on the utility plans where needed. • Provide a 210 foot transition from the 50 foot flowline to the 36 foot flowline x-section. Will also need a striping plan for this area, show the ending of the collector striping. • Indicate the existing slopes that Bon Homme Richard Drive and Ranger Drive are tieing into. • There are several locations in which the difference in flowline elevations at the midpoint of the curb return and the street elevation directly out from there is too close- This will cause a low spot in the asphalt that may not drain. These points need to have a minimum of .10 difference. • Provide off -site design for Bon Homme Richard Dr for at least 200 feet. Show how existing grades will meet with end of the new road. • On the square cul-de-sacs indicate on the typical detail or on the plans what the dimensions are for the crown high point location. • For the regular cul-de-sac in which the high point is not in the center of the cul-de-sac indicate the high point location. • Wahoo Streets need to be labeled as East and West to better distinguish which is which. • Provide additional dimensions for the vertical out fall curb and gutter - where is this to be used? • See Plans for additional comments �x �. (ztc- Development as a result of groundwater seepage, whether resulting from groundwater flooding, structural damage or other damage unless such damage or injuries are sustained as a re ua of The City of Fort Collins failure to properly maintain its water, wastewater, and/or storm drainage facilities in the de. eiopment. 7. Please see plans for any additional comments. Plat: 1. Provide additional easement widths as noted above for the pedestrian trail connections off the cul-de- sacs to ensure that the paths are not flush with a property line without an easement. 2. Revise the Notice of Other Documents language as shown in the redlined plans. Development Review Comments — Page 2 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 24, 2000 TO: Technical Svs PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge, 3rd Filing, Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: . Wednesday, September 13, 2000 ❑ No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" heeds be ltd be�fw_ fib+ wrap �-o .be O1 b�,ed 39'± Ia-� �� s P)Ct+ S P la [- 0rl'9lmq IS yheej �0 be. 0� 0. Date: Signature: CLECK M770TWOM RECEIVE COPIES Of REV19M ``i'lat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other _ Utility _ Redhe Utility — Landscape REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 24, 2000 TO: Technical Svs PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge, 3rd Filing, Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: . Wednesday, September 13, 2000 ❑ No Comment ElProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE*" j LA,- 2 h e e cis I-o W e 54�-y'r bp4t,4- t� 'Pc 3 SaI— A at we g e �0 .b orr9r1jq 1S heeA � rm fro�Iuc«lle $ugl;�y (n , be- o� Date: Signature:_ CHECK _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other — Utility — Redline Utility — Landscape 39,E a� t-1 is P)Q+ S Plq ,'s >re c-o,died. by E-91j , a 90cd REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 24, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #32-95E Registry Ridge, Yd Filing, Final PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: September 13, 2000 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Utility: 1. In general, it appears that the location of the pedestrian paths in relation to storm drainage improvements at the cul-de-sacs were improved with this resubmittal (see following comment). However, because the space still appears tight, a "blowup" of each area should be provided in each instance to assure that the design of the access ramps/storm improvements can "fit" in the given area without a short transition for the access ramp. 2. Additional easement width needs to be provided for the pedestrian paths (minimum 2') to ensure that the sidewalk is not flush with a property line without an easement for maintenance purposes (for Coral Sea Court, Tang Court, Wasp Court, and Sea Wolf Court.) 3. The location of driveways must be physically separated from the pedestrian trails shown at the cul- de-sacs. 4. The location of the catch basin inlet on Sea Wolf Court is still in conflict with the pedestrian access ramp. The catch basin cannot be located within the design for the access ramp as it either cuts short the transition or cannot be physically built. This design needs to be relooked at. While this issue should not be worth preventing the project from going to a hearing, the utility plans will not be approved without this design being corrected. Also note that this design causes a storm drainage line to be flush with a property line, without a necessary easement for maintenance on one side — provide additional easement width, either widen the tract or place an easement internal to lot 172. 5. Be aware that the building envelope on lot 148 encroaches into the sight distance easement. 6. The General Notes need to be modified as redlined. In addition, revise Note 11 and add an additional note as follows: Prior to final inspection and acceptance by The City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must be submitted to and approved by the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall be submittal to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of additional building permits to those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement. (additional note) The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for any damages or injuries sustained in this Date: September 20.2000 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 0 Plat 10 Site 2 Utility 2 Landscape 0 1 - _dkeport ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS Development as a result of groundwater seepage, whether resulting from groundwater flooding, structural damage or other damage unless such damage or injuries are sustained as a re .ult of The City of Fort Collins failure to properly maintain its water, wastewater, and/or storm drainage facilities in the development. 7. Please see plans for any additional comments. Plat: 1. Provide additional easement widths as noted above for the pedestrian trail connections off the cul-de- sacs to ensure that the paths are not flush with a } . operty line without an easement. 2. Revise the Notice of Other Documents language :s shown in the redlined plans. Development Review Comments — Page 2 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 3, 2000 TO: Mapping PROJECT: #32-95E Recistry Ridge. 3rd Filing, Final Compliance - LUC All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meetinb: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" �f I,e j �J e � I-,e t�7 I J Date: Signature: CHECK i E1T1FTU -WISfiT( L Plat _ site _ Drainage Report_ Other Utility Redline Wity _ Landscape City of Port Coitins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 11, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Registry Ridge P.U.D., 3rd Filing, — Final (LDGS) PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: February 2, 2000 ❑ No Problems 2 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Site Plan: • The site plan should call out the type of enhanced crosswalk proposed in the development. Plat: • The Plat appears OK. Utility There is a concern regarding the amount of street frontage for some of the cul-de-sac lots in the development. The available driveway widths of some tots are approximately 10' in width. Does the District have a concern with this amount of width for their services? This amount of width may also be too narrow for a homeowner to construct a depressed driveway curb cut. On some of these lots (example: Lot 184) with the access ramps for the pedestrian paths adjacent to the lots, there is the concern that the narrow frontage may result in a homeowner using the access ramp as vehicular access to their driveway. • The area inlet at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sea Wolf Court does not work with the access ramp in the same location. • The K Value for the vertical curve along the west side of Ranger Drive at the intersection with Bon Homme Richard Drive is too short. Please increase the vertical curve length to ensure a K value of 30 minimum, the plan shows a K value of 17. • Enhanced crosswalk types should be called out on the plan set (asphalt or concrete) and the appropriate details should be added. Note that additional details are required with the concrete enhanced crosswalk in the detail sheets (I believe I recently electronically mailed the CAD files for these for the next resubmittal.) • Show the access ramp at the termination of Curtiss Court. • The access ramp at the termination of Intrepid Coat should not be offset from the pedestrian path. (see plans for any additional comments — it appears further discussion is necessary with regards to the inlet, access ramp. and driveway frontage issues) Date: June 1, 2000 Signature: /flGl� PLEASE, SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 0 Plat RI Site El Utility 2 Landscape 0 Drainage Re�ort ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 11, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Registry Ridge P.U.D., 3`d Filing, — Final (LDGS) PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: February 2, 2000 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: • Engineering has no objection to the elimination of the traffic circle from previous submittals for the Ranger DriveBon Homme Richard Drive intersection. • What type of improvements are proposed for the crosswalk across Ranger Drive? Is it a raised crosswalk? The site plan shows a stamped pattern but is not indicated as such on the utility plan. Provide a detail of this crosswalk on the utility plan set. • Offsite grading, utility, drainage, and access easements are required prior to a hearing for this project. • The stub for the continuation of Bon Homme Richard Drive to the west should be eliminated as the land to the west is now owned by the City's Natural Resources Department — the stub is not needed. • It would be preferred that the trail connection between lots 152 and 153 be realigned to cross between lots 153 and 154 in order to align the trail with the intersection of Scamp Court. With the elimination of the stub street, the development can gain an additional lot. (Perhaps lot 153 can be moved to the former street stub location? It was discussed at staff review that the Stormwater Department would find this approach favorable as the area between lots 152 and 153 with the trail and the high volume passing through the swale area. Moving lot 153 to the stub and realigning the trail connection to Scampi Courtwas viewed as ideal by all City departments.) • Karen Manci (221-6310) writh the City's Natural Resources Department should be contacted with regards to the obtainment of offsite easements to the west. Site Plan: • Please show the phase lines on the site plan. • Show access ramps for the trail connections. • Note #9 no longer applies. Plat: • Plat Language needs to be updated writh regards to the Repair Guarantee. Please add the tollowmg to the end of the Repair Guarantee provision: Date: February 3, 2000 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONSC Q✓ Plat RI Site 2 Utility Rl Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS