Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY TECHNOLOGY PARK ODP SECOND AMENDMENT - Filed O-ODP/MASTER PLANS - 2005-06-14CAMBRIDGE AVENUE ACCESS DETAIL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED DOES/DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I/WE ARE THE LAWFUL OWNERS --.- A tract of land situate in the north half of section 4, township 6 north, range 68 west of the sixth p.m., OF REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON THIS SITE PLAN AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY county of Larimer, state of Colorado, which considering the north line of the northeast quarter of said THAT I/WE ACCEPT THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ON SAID OVERALL section 4 to bear east with all bearings contained herein relative thereto, being more particularly DEVELOPMENT PLAN. described as follows: Commencing at the north quarter corner of said section 4, thence s02°03'00"e, 25.00 feet to a point on the southerly right of way line of Colorado state highway no. 68, which is also the southerly line of Imago Efd9flortms, Inc. the harmony annexation no. 4 to the city of fort Collins, Colorado, and the true point of beginning; Lester M. Kaplan, President ('"3 Thence along said right of way the following two courses: 9 9 Y 9 BY. �� <. / �t ./�7, zo, 0V O 1. N89°54'00"E, 563.60 feet; lane, STATE OF COLORADO) PATE 2. N90°00'00"E, 393.47 feet to a point on the east right of way of cinquefoil said point ) SS. i d also being the northeast comer of the Johnson -harmony annexation to the city of fort Collins, \ COUNTY OF LARIMER Cn Colorado; /) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME + AY Thence along said Johnson -harmony annexation the following eight (8) courses: �J o 5 BY $r�-�2. ✓' M • 4o, Q to 11. THIS I Qfb DAY OF A.D., 3n% 1. S02°03'30"E, 393.12 feet; SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS j(}}-i,� DAY OF V e(t j y-1 j Q w A.D., 10()S ��--- _--- - ---- 2. N90°00'00"E, 590.11 feet to the westerly boundary of the fossil creek inlet ditch; 'T _ s<- 3. Thence along said westerly boundary of the fossil creek inlet ditch, s0o°52'00"e, 36.35 feet; MY NOTORIAL COMMISSION EXPIRES G O'o��'O�] 0 4. S53°50'00"E, 125.95feet; 5. S61 °20'00"E, 202.54 feet; 6. S36°30'00"E, 285.09 feet; YLS TALp�TTs'jl 7. S27°35'00"E, 392.54feet; NOT NOTARY PUBLIC U II /4, �O 9L({ W I\ C. : 8. S11 °51'00"E, 106.27 feet to the easterly comer of said Johnson -harmony annexation; )?i ' U, me a ADDRESS / Thence continuing along said westerly boundary of the fossil creek inlet ditch and within the L,pve •OI ,,C-0 �S 3 -] t((P. A G •O// Brookfield annexation to the city of fort Collins the following three (3) courses: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1. 9�'. U B 1 � . •QPj Lo d 1. S11°51'00"E, 761.03 feet; 2. S21 °48'00"E, 389.14 feet; 3. S24°06'00"E, 256.00 feet to a point on the south line of the northeast quarter of said CeWfim Cron, a Delawam Corporation , rk, F6'a; �, �i I%1«n agar ODP OARY section 4, said point also being the southerly boundary of the Brookfield annexation to the city KsMnOlWer Z r ud y ,- �� ) p S 79 E ITY_ _-J T of fort Collins; Thence N89°07'31"W, 1629.56 feet to the southeasterly comer of the Johnson -harmony annexation /j � ICJ AP, J as 005 BY: , O.W. LO to the city of fort Collins; Thence continuing n89°07'31"w, 897.97 feet to the center quarter comer of said section 4, said point STATE OF COLORADO) \ DATE also being the southeast corner of the harmony farm annexation to the city of fort Collins; \ J S.S. -_-_--- Thence along the boundary of the harmony farm annexation the following eleven It 1) courses: COUNTY OF LARIMER /1 YEWAY AE LtEPTUAL ONLY 1. N89°0T05"W, 2655.72 feet to the west quarter corner of said section 4; 2. NO2°00'05"W, 198.55 feet along the west line of the said northwest quarter to the southeast THE FOREGOING INST MENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS�� DAY OF f A.D., BY rrujy wtjpa�L w tI�-1 IN AEEEL IFFFeI B DE1Ei� 11NEfA BY L corner of the south harmony annexation to the city of fort Collins, Colorado; 3. NO2°00'05"W, 2258.24 feet along the east line of said south harmony annexation and the SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS ZG�DAY OF LL -t A.D., 24� . � �I ?Nr N:.. i� west line of said northwest quarter to a point on the southerly right of way line of Colorado 2 LU state highway no. 68, which is also the southerly line of the harmony annexation no. 3 to the MY NOTORIAL COMMISSION EXPIRES �_; ---- - city of fort Collins, Colorado; 26.10 feet; 4. Along the southerly line of the said annexation and highway no. 68 n83°30'55"e, W v 5. N41°02'55"E, 73.20 feet; 6. N87°O6'40"E, 500.70 feet; Nor PUBLIC 1` Y MOE] >� r 7. S89°59'05"E, 613.00 feet; cc 8. N89°50'40"E, 1000.00 feet; 9. S89°59'05"E, 350.00 feet; ADDRESS /� b CAInnne t-'C .-O`t'��j 1 ��/�� My cOMMISSION N IREJ N20 < 0 10. along the southerly line of the harmony annexation no. 4 to the city of fort Collins, Colorado CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE V and the said highway no. 68, N89°59'05"E, 86.40 feet; 0 _ _ 11. N89°54'55"E, 25.25 feet to the point of beginning. W N u Except therefrom a parcel of land located in the northeast quarter of said section 4, more Coirpoiration a O particularly described as follows: �Com�' � �i Managar cc Commencing at the north quarter comer of said section 4, thence S02°03'00"E, 498.47 feet along S 71 r> CrK /toraoo n' DRI WAIDRI WA the west line of the northeast quarter of said section 4 to the northwest comer of lot two of ricketts BY: iAROUND harmony minor subdivision; said point also being the true point of beginning; DATE STATE OF COLORADO Thence along the north line of said lot two N88°55'02"E, 299.85 feet to the northeast comer of said \ lot two, said point also being on the westerly boundary of the Johnson -harmony annexation to the \ J S.S. city of fort Collins, Colorado; COUNTY OF LARIMER /1 Thence along said westerly boundary of the Johnson -harmony annexation S02°03'00"E, 524.27 THE FQI2EGOING INST-RUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME feet; Thence N90°00'00"W, 300.00 feet to a point on the west line of said northeast quarter of section 4; THIS I Li DAY OF A.D., Q00C) BY r, Thence along said west line NO2°03'00"W, 51 B.59 feet to the point of beginning. J SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS Iu� DAY OF F?p rla o_fu A.D, rZO5. -�`� Said described tract contains a total of 270.19 acres more or less. MY NOTORIAL COMMISSION EXPIRES �Pi I I .� � o0 9i ----- __ LAND USE TABLE (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) PARCEL A B G D E F G H 1 TOTALS APPROXIMATE PROPOSED USES ACREAGE PERCENTAGE Off ice/Manufacturing 32.0 ac. 11.C3% (existing) Secondary 0.63 ac. Child Care Center (existing) Primary 34.98 ac. Secondaryy 151 ac. (Non-residentla I) Primary 15:6 ac. Open Space 6.9 ac. Harmony Corridor Setback Secondary 4.1 ac. Secondary 2.8 ac. Primary 43 ac. Primary B.S ac. Secondary 11.1 ac. Secondary 13B ac. Primary 19.1 ac. Open Space 0.9 ac. Natural Resource Buffer Primary 10A ac. Secondary 112 ac. Secondary 14.15 ac. Secondary 36 ac. Open Space 4.16 ac. Open Space 2a34 ac. Natural Resource Buffer 02go 13.1� 2a3go 283% 2.690 l b% 1.0 % 1.6% LAND USE TABLE (PROPOSED) PARCEL A B C D E F G PROPOSED USES APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PERCENTAGE office/Manufacturing 32.0 ac. 11.C3% (existing) Secondary Db3 ac. 02`ro Child Care Center (existing) Primary 34.98 ac. 13.0% Secondary 151 ac. 22% (Non-residential) Primary 15b ac. 282% Open Space 6.S ac. 25% Harmony Corridor Setback Secondary 825 ac. 3/0% Primary 355 ac. 0.3% 331% H Primary 11.9 ac. 4.4% 4.4% I Secondary 11.1 ac. 43% 5.1% J Secondary 13.5 ac. 5.0% 1.4% K Primary 19.7 ac. 13% 03% L Open Space 0.9 ac. 03% NAturaI Resource Buffer 3.13% M Primary 10.4 ac. 32 42% N Secondary 112 ac. 4.19. 53% O Secondary 14.15 ac. 52`ro 1 ro P Secondary 36 ac. 0.190 1/0% Q Open Space 4.16 ac. 15% 1.1% R Open Space 2.84 ac. 1.0% Natural Resource Buffer 261.18 ac. 100% TOTALS 210.18 ac. 100% CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE ice o ��tnnna,� 05�ry �FXPIRES 051 South Harmony, LLC Brad Bennett, I' wWant / Atli '�, BY: STATE OF COLORADO) DATE COUNTY OF LARIMER /) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS i-I-N DAY OF 1 A.D., Zo oS BY 6tz_A-Di�-R-D fJ NCB SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS L 74 DAY OF M A Y A-D., MY NOTORIAL COMMISSION EXPIRES I CP '20 0- 7 NOTAI . PUB IG r ADDRESS :� f6ve. AU 15 90111 CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE SHEET INDEX SHEET 1 COVER SHEET SHEET 2 ODP PLAN SHEET 3 CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN SHEET 4 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN VICINITY MAP R I au E R LAPOM COMM - cc HOROET' ROAD E "L 9 PDX I o (E�7j__j E ELM Fill. 1 ♦ Q ram Q W♦---- I Nc (� w "c He r - IIC HARMONY ROAD ti r HO HO /i I c R R R r R /- - 1 kr uw CITY Llnlr / R '----- op� L • • • uII11e1001MrY 0( Q NOWH , NOTES 1. ANY CHANGE IN THE LOCATION OF ACCESS POINTS WITH PDP SUBMITTALS NEEDS TO COMPLY WiTH THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS LAND USE CODE AND THE COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS CODE ON ACCESS LOCATIONS. ACCESS POINTS ALONG HARMONY ROAD WILL ALSO NEED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WiTH THE HARMONY ROAD ACCESS CONTROL PLAN. 2. STREET IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE DESIGN STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN(S). 3. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY STANDARDS. 4. ALL ACCESS POINTS ALONG HARMONY ROAD (COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 68) MUST BE APPROVED BY THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT). 5. THE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ROUTES SHOWN ARE NOT TO PRECLUDE A STREET THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD APPROVAL APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO ON THISc?DA DAY OF MAY AD a00k• p lv SECRETMRY OF TI4E PLAWNG AND ZONING BOARD a t COVER ST_ -� HARMONY TECHNOLOGY PARK 'SEC01®TD AMENDMENT OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORT COLLINS.COLORADO BHA DESIGN, INC. • 48M INNOVATION DR. ® Fr. COLLINS, GO80W5 • TEL: (970) 223-7577 design SHEET 1 OF 4 MAY IO.Z004 ,' M P/- G. F�cE t z - g) PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Plannine DATE: March 1, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #12-97C Harmony Technology Park —Amended ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: March 29, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference NO 6.0M�� Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape PROJECT COMMENT SHEET MAR 32000 Current Planning DATE: March 1, 2000 TO: Transfort PROJECT: #12-97C Harmony Technology Park —Amended ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: March 29, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference CHECK HE IF OU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site Drainage Report Other _Utility _Redline Utility Landscape PROJECT SHEET DATE: March 1, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #12-97C Harmony Technology Park —Amended ODP— Type 11(LUC) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: March 29, 2000 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: • The proposed east/ west collector street should be labeled as Rock Creek Drive (or whatever the street is called for the Harvest Park development) and should align with the point of access on the west side of CR 9. • Please add the access points as described on the redlined ODP. • Technology Parkway needs to be shown as a collector street that ties into the ease/west collector street — Rock Creek. • Please label all arrows, which are shown on the perimeter of the property, as "future street connections". • Please add the notes indicated on the ODP. • Please add a note that states "The pedestrian circulation routes is not be shown to preclude a street through the development". • Currently, Kathleen Reavis, Transportation Planning Dept, is working with a team to update the access plan for Harmony Road (State Hwy 68), which should be completed in April. This plan effects the Willowbrook ODP and the Harmony Technology Park ODP in that it is reviewing access options for Cambridge Avenue, Cinquefoil Street, and County Road 7. At this point in time, the City cannot support a signalized intersection at Cambridge Drive and a % access at Cinquefoil Lane. • CDOT is preparing design options to Harmony Road (State Hwy 68), which may effect grades at the Cinquefoil Street Intersection. As I understand it, the redesign and construction of these improvements may raise or lower that intersection. • Eric Bracke, City Traffic Engineer and Kathleen Reavis have concerns about the Traffic Impact Study. These concerns relate to the Harmony Road (State Hwy 68) access plan. Their concerns need to be addressed in the traffic study prior to considering any construction improvements. • Please address the specific comments and concerns redlined on the ODP. • Please show the street network through Parcel B. • Please include pedestrian corridors on the ODP and label as s h. Date: Anril3.2000 Signature: — PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ❑ Plat ❑ Site ❑ Utility ❑ Landscape ❑ Drainage Report m ODP 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS %wr PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: March 1, 2000 TO: Street Oversizing PROJECT: #12-97C Harmony Technology Park —Amended ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: March 29, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: June 21, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #12-97 Harmony Technology Park — Amended ODP — Type If (LUC) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: July 12 2000 ❑ No Problems O Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE PLAN • The Engineering Department cannot support the proposed access configuration along Rock Creek Drive and Cambridge Drive. Public access points need to be provided at 660 foot intervals. • Refer to the Alternative Compliance Plan for more specific comments. AMENDED ODP • Please modify note number 1 on the Cover Sheet. • Please modify the proposed access points as shown on sheet number 2. • See ODP for additional comments and concerns. Date: July 18, 2000 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ❑ Plat ❑ Site ❑ Uuliry ❑ Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 ODP ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS 1 {4 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 9, 2004 TO Traffic Ops PROJECT: # 12-97C Harmony Technology Park - ODP - Type H (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 No Comment © Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" l..OAIe# v 46 RECEIVED REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 9, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #12-97C Harmony Technology Park — ODP — Type II (LUC) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: August 30, 2000 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: • Please modify note # 1. • Please show the proposed pedestrian/bicycle circulation routes as shown on the plans. • Please resolve the conflict between this plan and the Hewlett Packard pilot project. • Please show the proposed transportation access point as indicated on the plans. ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE PLAN: • Please add the transportation access points where indicated. Date: September 1, 2000 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ❑ Plat ❑ Site ❑ Utility ❑ Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 ODP 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS CENTER. (3.0 Gross Derm 4.0 Net Density) HARVEST PARK SUBDIVISION (4.41 Gross Density, 5.08 Net Density) ODP PLAN SCALE: I"•ZOO NORTH 0 I00' 200400' INTERSECTION FOSSIL RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL PRIMARY USES EXISTING TREE, TYPICAL PRIMARY USES INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF USES: RESEARCH FACILITIES, TESTING LABORATORIES, OFFICES AND OTHER FACILITIES FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INDUSTRIAL USES, HOSPITALS, CLINICS, NURSING AND PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES, REGIONAL VOCATIONAL BUSINESS OR PRIVATE SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES, FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, PROFESSIONAL OFFICES, AND OTHER USES OF SIMILAR CHARACTER, AS DETERMINED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. SECONDARY USES FUTURE FULL TURN/SIGNAL INTERSECTION ACCESSORY USES ACCESSORY USES SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE PRIMARY USE AREAS. ACCESSORY USES MAY INCLUDE FOOD SERVICE, TRAVEL AGENCY, COFFEE SHOPOR SIMILAR SERVICE/RETAIL USES THAT ARE SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE PRIMARY USE. NOTES MINIMUM DENSITY FOR RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE 7 UNITS PER ACRE. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR ALL NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE SIX (6) STORIES. PROPOSED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT INTERSECTION LEGEND ENEEMENEEN ODP BOUNDARY PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLE CIRCULATION 0 0 0 0 PROPOSED OFF-STREET TRAIL (From City of Fort Collins Parks & Recreation Policy Plan Master Plan) SECONDARY USES INCLUDE SINGLE- FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS, LODGING ESTABLISHMENTS, CONVENTION AND MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE THREE (3) STORIES. PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET CONFERENCE CENTERS, COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTERS, BED AND BREAKFAST ESTABLISHMENTS, PLACES OF WORSHIP AND Y THE CITY OF FORT GOWNS AND THE SANITARY SEWER ASSEMBLY, STANDARD RESTAURANTS, NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE SHOPPING CENTERS, LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES, CHILD SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED WATER WILL BE PROVIDED BYTTHE FORT GOWNS LOINSAND SANITATION DISTRICT. INDICATES AREA ADDED WITH CENTERS, ATHLETIC CLUBS, AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SCHOOLS FOR ELEMENTARY, JUNIOR HIGH AND HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION.BY SECOND AMENDMENT OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN HARMONY TECHNOLOGY PARK SECOND AMENDMENT OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORT COLLINS.COLORADO BHA DESIGN, INC. • 4803INNOVATION DR. IM FT. GOWNS, 0080525 • TEL: (970) 223-7577 design rM S H E E T 2 O F 4 MAY IO. Z004 EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION EXISTING 16" WATER d C0 EXISTING 30" PRESTON CENTER TIMBERWOOD DRIVE (EXISTING) WILDWOOD SUBDIVISION (3.0 Gross Density, 4.0 Net Density) PROPOSED FULL TURN/SIGNAL INTERSECTION --U HARMONY CORRIDOR SETBACK FUTURE FULL TURN/SIGNA INTERSECTION V� L PROPOSED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT INTERSECTION HARMONY ROAD TRANSIT v 80� HARMONY CORRIDOR SHELTER n � SECONDARY US So' HARMONY CORRIDOR G LANDSCAPE SETBACK (EXISTING) LANDSCAPE SETBACK 0.63 ACRES SPRIIMARY USESECONDARY - 3.55 AC. NOT A PART ACCESS POINT 11.8 ACRES 0.3 FAR EXISTING PROPOSED (+/— 153,000 S.F. GFA) TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION ACCESS POINT SHELTER(RIGHT—INOU RIGHT—WT WHEN � A FUTURE ROAD IS DEVELOPED 8 PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN TO SOUTH) &ROPOSE 4700 CAMBRIDGE AVE, TRANSPORTATI ACCESS POINT -_ FUTURE PUBLIC RO GLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AESS POINT EXTENSION NOT A PART PROPOSED WW CELESTICA COLORADO i7� AMBRODGGEECAVE,REDEVEL TRANSPORTATION uj (EXISTING) AccEss POINT ZQo- 32.0 ACRES PR __ ATER MAIN JIn }- (COLLECTOR STREET) Jv EXISTING LIFT STATION TO BE Q ACCESS POINT 708 ABANDONED AT THE TIME THE z GLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 0O PROPOSED LIFT STATION IS Y > w NOT A PART LL_� PRIMARY USES OPERATIONAL AND THE E Q �� 190 3 ACRES GRAVITY SEWER TO THE LIFT STATION IS EXTENDED TO THE p_ w Lu o PRIMARY USES PRIMARY USES zZ (+/ 260 000 S.F. GFA) PRIVATE ACCESS CELESTICA SITE. U� —o — DRIVE PARCEL BOUNDARY, TYP. �- In 75.6 ACRES I0 LEI 11.9 ACRES U PROPOSED SEWER MAIN �. CD w 0.35 FAR - 0 0.3 FAR v (TYP) _.,. ACCESS POINT q. d(/— 1,150,000 S.F. GFA) my (;+/— 155,000 S.F. GFA) . OW J Q I EX/SnNG B SE19)-R PROEEPOgSSED pFULL TURN I�PUBLIC ROAD U W ACCESS) OPOSED TRANSPORTATION EXISTING 30 SEWER MAIN SECONDARY USES D L---- (NON—RESIDENTIAL USES) 7.57 ACRES r (+%35 FAR 115,000 S.F. GFA I,1 1 II PROPOSED FULL TURN INTERSECTION HARVEST PARK SUBDIVISION (4.41 Gross Density 5.08 Net Density) C PRIMARY USES 34.98 ACRES Q 0.35 FAR 533,000 S.F. f 2 TRANSPORTATION V ACCESS POINT PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP) ROCK CREEK DRIVE (COLLECTOR STREET) ACCESS POINT 3 ACCESS POINT X W �i TRAPANNSPPOORRTATION ACCESS POINT '--- EXISTING TREE, TYPICAL FOSSIL RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL 200 scale N 0 2DO 400 1"=200' feet ( STATE HIGHWAY 68) NOT A PART ODP BOUNDARY NATURAL RESOURCES BUFFER (50' FROM CREEK) S, 0.9 ACRES M OPEN "ShACE 0.36 AC. u 2 PRIMARY USES SECONDARY USES 110.4 ACRES 1.7 ACRES 0.3 FAR 18 DU/AC ' 135,000 S.F. GFA) SECbND0 210 Units) PRECM„VAVW USES EX/STING 8" SEB'ER 14.15 ACR 51� - EX1S71"I7 10&-*ER , V EXISDNC 10• SEWER -+- 25 ( Units) SECONDARY USES b2smv B*WATER - 13.5 ACRES 18 DU/AC SECONDARY USES bRAINA & 240 Units) e 11.2 ACRES DETENTI N 18 / ARE PROPOSED ('+ /—DOOCU .84 RES NOT A PART Q O z CD a n U w V) ? w Qz � Q" N V � G_ Z S m DRAWN MH CHECKED SFH DESIGNED 5FH FILENAME cncptutil U Z 0 a 2 TS1, INC. Consulting Engineers 748 Whalers Way, Bldg. D Fort Collins, Colorado 970-226-0557 JOB NO. 050-010 SCALE 1 " = 200' DATE May 6, 2004 SHEET 3 of 4 '//k EXISTING 30" SE PRESTON CENTER TIMBERWOOD DRIVE (EXISTING) WILDWOOD SUBDIVISI ' 0 n PROPOSED FULL TURN/SIGNAL FUTURE PROPOSED INTERSECTION FULL TURN/SIGNAL RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT _ INTERSECTION INTERSECTION o —.tea U Is, -- A _ _ _ - p HAR ONY R0 D (STATE HIGHWAY 68 I I Dle Q y ma ---- TRANSIT " I SECO Y U 80 HA MONY CORRIDOR 80' HA A 5ETB<RIbOR A FART CK o ( ST G) LANDS APE SETBACK n:a SECONDARY USES - 8.25 AC. 0.63 ACRES i PRIMARY USES - 3.55 AC. N A k T ACCESS POINT 11.8 ACRES a3 FAR /L'� BOUNDARY DRAWN OROPOSED (+/- 153,000 S.F, GFA) � �` jj�� MH XISTINGTRANSPORTATION \\ V L� F TRANSIT r ACCESS POINT «. \ ;_ \ \ i CHECKED TRANSIT ��I i � ( -m " , , RIGNT-IN-- SHELTER i MGNT ItN WHEN SFH FUTURE ROAD IS _ .e+5 DEVELOPED PROPOSED B" WATER MAIN DesicNEo TO PROPO �� Y I- FU TU BLIC OTF+) 47DO CAMBRIDOE AVE. TRANSPORTAn CCESS T . • SFH OLE FAMILY RESIDENT! PR; < AESS POINT p EC FILENAME NOT A PART R J C�LE ICA "COLORADO "ExrEN I �p� r T AL RESOU C cncptutil .. (TO BC TRU D WHEN TRANSPTATION it WwyJ BUFFER _ 4700 CA BRIDG AVE. REDEVELOP ACCESS POINT Z (5 FROM CREEK) (EXISTING) " Q D. ACRES PROPOSEDWATER MAIN �- ) _j ' 32.0 ACRES � ( -, I COLLECTOR TREET, EXISTING LIFT STATION TO BE Q ACCESS POINT �, , 708 CAMBRIDGE AVE. �p a, y ' W $ � � H ABANDONED AT THE TIME THE z �- FAMILY RESIDENT! �J �q I ,jo f 3 W LLI NOT A PART _ Pk` 1VI A �� k PROPOSED LIFT STATION IS ,� w OPERATIONAL AND THE E Q� 19.7 A ES GRAVITY SEWER TO THE IFT Q, ^� 0.3 FA ,STATION IS EXTENDED T THE w o _ .__ ,' \ PRIVATE AccEss CELESTICA SITE. PRIMARY USES PRIMARY SES Zo (+/— 260,b00 F: GFA� `� Al P RT DRIVE PARCEL BO N ARY TYP i-N 75.6 ACRE S 0_j 11.9 AS U Of 0.35 FAR o `y 0.3 FAR U., ' ��rErNiriorLi li' ACCES P I �� a(/- 1,150,000 S.F. GFA) �� i (+/- 155;a00 S.F. AREA �I 0 . w - uj 11 77 (3.0 Gross Densk ROPOSED FULL TURN U U - 4.0 Net Density 4 _ - W ( II EE ��EE pp c- I�'TUBRLICC�6AD s ACCESS) E0 iRnNsPo�RTAn ? OPEN AC. Q I Z 0 0.36 AC., W Z ACCESS POINT, f] set PRIMARY' _'USE � SECONDARY ; e 10.4 ACRES 0 17 AC R 18DUC O AC S POINi` / 0.3 FAR SECON_D'AIRY W \ Unit arrrr USE Q Lu ya� - 14. ACRES'r V �FC' .. - ---. � ` II 18 .DU/AC " C� PRIMARYUSES a 34.98 ACRES 4�,�. - �� S ONDARY 0.35 FAR 3� - USES _ - ., 533,000 S.F. Ilk Jcc 3 . �, r J U D �, - APPROVED' ., 'SECONDARY -USES - (+/ ; , nits (NON—RESIDENTIAL I DETENT�oN 1 USES) i AREA 13.5 ACRESCL I. y - 18 DU/AC,....,' ,.. ef>�AE�1UefAgr - 6RAINAGE - & DETEN '� ' 7.57 ACRES O 240 Unit SECONDARY S DETENTION AREA W I 35 FAR Z I ", 11,2 AC y �+ V V ACCESS POINT 1RANS ATION PROP DOTE I L T 2©0 L 2.84 ACRES W z +% 115,000 S.F. GFA) PRdPOSEO Z It DETE TION (18 DU ) AREA TRANSPORTATION pRtS '', ACCESS _ " TRAN TAl10N A' r r _ ACCESS _44, e=N-J) ' U O PROPOSED p EXISTING STORM SEWER C FULL TURN \ I 1 t ROCK CREEK f EXISTINGF STORM s TO 54" � n � � VARIES FROM 36" TO 54" I L I INTERSECTION VARIES FROM L.� ACCESS POIN HARVEST PARK (COLLECTOR STREET) FUTURE STREET Q CONNECTION SUBDIVISION O (4.41 Gross Density �— EXISTING TREE, TYPICALWILLOW BROOK 5.08 Net Density) - %W *40 From: GayLene Rossiter To: TS.STR.KREAVIS Date: 6/4/97 4:16pm Subject: Harmony Technology Park ODP - Transit Comments Please incorporate Transfort's comments with overall Transportation Services comments: Future Service - In addition to the Future Transfort Bus Shelter & stop on Harmony that is already shown on the CDP - We would like the same on CR 9 for future north/south transit service with convenient access near the entrance into the site. Current Service - Transfort has service into Hewlett Packard and we are in the process of evaluating that route. If we find that there would be an opportunity in the future to extend this route to the Harmony Technology Park, it may be more feasible for Transfort and would be more convenient for employees at the site if there were a turnaround and bus stop within this site. cc: Dave Stringer, Ted Shepard CC: FCI.ENG NET.DSTRINGER, FCI.CPES.TSHEPARD r * T.e�y'� . • li DATE: June 30, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #12-97 Harmony Technology Park - Type II (LUC) Overall Development Plan PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, July 23, 1997 1. An Amendment to the Harmony Road Access Control Plan will be required. The submitted traffic study indicated that an additional traffic signal at the western access to HP would not degrade the Level Of Service of Harmony Road. Discussion with the State to amend the Access Control Plan should start immediately. Mr. Bob Grube of the CDOT is the contact person, he can be reached at (970) 350-2152. The City Traffic Engineer will support such an amendment. This traffic signal will also assist pedestrians and bicyclists in crossing Harmony Road between HP and Celestica Site. This amendment will only be supported if the southern leg of the intersection is a public road that provides for circulation for the entire area. 2. Because the TIS used trip generation similar to the existing conditions of the HP site, each phase must have the condition that the user will provide documentation and assurances that trip reductions will be achieved. 3. The developer is creating the need for the traffic signal on Harmony Road. Therefore, this cost shall at the developers expense. 4. The addition of the traffic signal at Timberwood and County Rd.. 9 will be evaluated at each phase enters the development process and should not be interpreted as a "given". 5. Improvements to Harmony Road and County Road 9 will be required, these may include bicycle lanes, acceleration and deceleration lanes, roadway surface improvements, additional right-of-way and utility easement dedications to current City standards. 6. Cambridge Drive will need to be improved to City standards. May require addition right-of- way and easement dedications. 7. Some type of buffer to screen the existing estate lots along Cambridge may be required. ff �.�.�� %�-.-E-c.•_--. tom=tom.-_� � rat ✓�--• �-Gu:,..� fie, a w W %1W M HARMONY TECHNOLOGY PARK PAGE 2 COPY 9. The ped LOC "C" for crossing Harmony Road is acceptable in this case. However, crosswalk improvements (whether at CR. 9 or the new location proposed to align with the HP west entrance) will be required per the list in the ped LOS matrix, ( special pavement treatments to highlight crossing areas, increased walk time, increased lighting, ped refuge areas m medians, increased attention to clear lines of site, etc.). 10. The LOS "A" finding for directness and continuity to HP are inaccurate, there are not any sidewalks along HP's property on either CR 9 or Harmony, so the project fails to meet these categories. To meet these categories it is the responsibility of the developer to negotiate with HP to provide and install sidewalks along CR 9 and Harmony to the entrance to HP. 11. If a traffic signal is not built at HP's Harmony Road west entrance, then the crosswalk at CR 941armony needs to be improved and or an overpass could be built along Harmony to connect the she with HP once the site is fully developed. 12. Regarding the bicycle LOS, Preston Center is not the only applicable destination. Include HP,(future) Symbios, and the adjacent neighborhoods. The TIS needs to be revised to show these destinations. Include the fact that bike lanes already exist on CR 9 north of Harmony and with their frontage improvements they will make this connection also. Date: Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: [3�PLAT o � t PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Plannins DATE: March 1, 2000 TO: Trans Planning PROJECT: #12-97C Harmony Technology Park — Amended ODP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: March 29, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Project: Harmony Technology Park —ODP Department: Transportation Planning Kathleen Reavis, phone (970)224-6140 or email: kreaxis,alci.fort-collins co us Transportation Impact Study/ODP 1. TIS needs to address pedestrian and bicycle LOS requirements pertaining to the planned school/park site on CR36 (south side of roadway, across from Cinquefoil intersection) as well as the planned community park site on CR9 just south of future Rock Creek Drive connection. The school/park site on CR36 needs to include analysis of street king options, including a grade separated underpass. 2. TIS and ODP need to address connectivity to the future multi -use trail planned along CR7 between Harmony Road and CR36. 3. TIS needs to address Eric Bracke's requirements for analysis of the Harmony/Cambridge intersection, showing options with a future signalized intersection and without (as a 3/. intersection). Needs to show Cinquefoil as a RIRO option vs. the'/.. Final determination of type of access allowed at the intersections of Harmony/Cambridge and Harmony/Cinquefoil intersections will be determined jointly by the City and CDOT through the update to the Harmony Road Access Control Plan. A draft of the plan recommendations will be available in mid -April and I copy will be sent to Matt Delich. 4. TIS and ODP need to include extension of Harmony Technology Parkway south to intersect with future Rock Creek Drive extension and needs to show Rock Creek Drive intersections aligning (as one 4-legged intersection) at CR9 instead of the off -set. Name the east/west collector as "Rock Creek Drive", Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site _Drainage Report Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins From: Eric Bracke To: Bob Blanchard, Ron Fuchs Date: 317/00 11:08 AM Subject: Harmony Tech ODP I have had an opportunity to review the Harmony Tech Park CDP TIS and offer the following comments 1. The TIS assumes that Cambridge will be a signalized intersection. This is not a fair assumption. When the City agreed to signalize Technology Parkway, Cambridge was used as the lever. The City is now in a position to "justify" the need for a signal at Cambridge. 2. The analysis for the justification will require a redistribution of trips to the other signalize intersections. It may also require a reevaluation of land use distributions/types. 3. The analysis should be in a format that CDOT is used to such as an access control plan format. 4. AM and PM PASSER or Synchro runs must be provided (with and without Cambridge) 5. Cinquefoil/Harmony is shown as a 3/4 intersection. The Harmony Road access contol plan has it as an approved ri/ro. A wb left turn addition to the intersection is not supported at this time. 6. Since Technology Parkway is a public collector, I have the expectation that it will continue southward to make the connection to the east -west collector. Kind Regards, Eric L. Bracke, P.E. Traffic Engineer City of Fort Collins email: ebracke@ci.fort-collins.co. us CC: Dave Stringer, FC1:INET:mdelich@frii.com, Kathie...