The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOAKRIDGE BUSINESS PARK THIRTYFOURTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-05-05PROJECT (Wzoft COMMENT SHEET City of Font Collins Current Planning DATE: May 9, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #13-82CQ OAKRIDGE BUSINESS PARK 34T" FILING — NHA OF FORT COLLINS - FINAL COMPLIANCE (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: 0 May 23, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference 1-D > .tL �. D, wif h5 iotis G1rQ vvtrSS� ✓�q �1-GH L'li l'GV 64 N}��u yip i r 7 "� i -1 � ti `� r', i•. _ . r+ . _ ,_ ` _ , b , is a Nance (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _ Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: October 5, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #13-82CD Oakridge Business Park 34th Filing, NHA Fort Collins — PDP — Type H (LUC) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: October 18, 2000 ❑ No Problems Cd Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) • In general, please coordinate between the site and utility plans. I'm finding discrepancies between the two with regards to dimension widths. • The fire lane shown along the north needs to be 20' wide minimum. If the 5' or 6' sidewalk is part of this, the sidewalk should be designed to meet the criteria of a fire lane with regards to loading capabilities. Note that the site plan and utility plans appear to conflict with regards to this sidewalk width. • A turnaround for the fire lane needs to be provided with a minimum diameter of 80' [LUC 3.6.6(E)]. This would not be required in the instance where the fire lane exceeds 150' in total length from the intersecting public street, which appears to be the case with the proposal. • Is 5'/6' sufficient for the bike/ped connection in lieu of the street connection? • The hammerheads need to be a minimum of 35' in depth, not 25' as proposed on the utility plan. • Please better show current right-of-way and street width along Wheaton Drive in order to see what is dedicated. The utility plans and site plans appear to conflict with regards to the proposed sidewalk width and separation width from the curb. Clearly indicate these dimensions. • PFA would prefer that the fire hydrant shown on the south side of the southern drive aisle be relocated on the north side of the aisle in order to prevent the hose from crossing a travel lane. • Please note the redline changes to the General Notes and plat language. Add the following paragraph to the end of (and as part of) the Repair Guarantee language: The Obligations Of The Undersigned Pursuant To The "Maintenance Guarantee " And "Repair Guarantee" Provis ions Set Forth Above May Not Be Assigned Or Transferred To Any Other Person Or Entity Unless The I Uarranted Improvements Are Completed By, And A Letter Of Acceptance Of The Warranted Improi ements Is Received From The City By, Such Other Person Or Entity. • Provide an access ramp for the sidewalk across the south side of the northern driveway (and a detail Date: October 25. ?000 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIOO IqSS- 0 Plat 10 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS of this on the utility plan detail sheet. It appears that drainage is being directed from the private drive across the public sidewalk with this plan on the north side of the southern driveway. Drainage is not allowed to be directed across the sidewalk per ".6.2(L)(2)(l). The plat needs to show the access and utility easement along the south driveway as emergency access easement as %%ell. Why is 8.8' of utility easement being dedicated on the plat? 9' is required for Wheaton Drive as a collector road\% ay. See plans for any additional comments Development Review Comments — Page 2 fit Current Planning Affordable Housithy Comment Beset DATE: October 5, 2000 TO: En ineering HL C I All C _`);iiifi ii. i �', i ', ed? 1 Ron Fuchs in Current no L?! i.l; lick'; IiMimi: Wellnesdav, October 18, 2000 'rz3tk'a Please Zd C`Itt(1 ,l' I- �'L',��Iftesfimfliture 1`f'�('7-ence Date _-__----__-_-__-_-_ .. �`il 1. fii..\i lfytiii RIA 1 P, LU,''•__`, CH i2. ilslo'l\' e3. ui PROJECT �� COMMENT SHEET Citv of Fort Collins Current Plannin-, DATE: May 9, 2001 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #13-82CQ OAKRIDGE BUSINESS PARK 347' FILING — N HA OF FORT COLLINS - FINAL COMPLIANCE (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: May 23, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Name (please print) -- CHECK HERE IF YOV WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Sitc Dramagc Report Other Utility Redlinc Utilm Landscape cav f Fort Collins ®1 Affordable Housing Obw rF Comment Sheet DATE: March 2, 2001 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #13-82CD Oakridge Business Park 341h Filing — NHA (National Healthcare Associates) — Type II (LUC) PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: March 28, 2001 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments: 1. No comments were addressed regarding the plat. Please see the comments from the previous submittal. (156 /irr!,4cvc;� /✓Z,i -e7AT ( Y6UALfs—.a' 6-Z eC,-,0v.e, 2. An ID Sign is indicated on the utility plan set and is located in the utility easement, this might be of concern to the utilities depending on the structure. I did not see a detail of the sign on the architectural drawings. 3. Coordinate between the site and utility plan. There are discrepancies with regards to pedestrian connections, ID sign location, etc. 4_ Pedestrian connectivity was questioned by Transportation Planning. It appears that based on the utility plan, the pedestrian area along the building between the handicap parking and the front facade along Wheaton shows pedestrians having to walk through a "Can Wash" among other item. ( What is a "Can Wash"?) Please ensure unobstructed pedestrian connectivity. 5. Per PFA, The maximum length of a fire lane is 150' from the intersecting street. As such, the fire lane needs to be measured 150' from the flowline of Wheaton Drive. This area needs to be dedicated as an emergency access easement on the plat. The current additional length beyond the 150' needs to be eliminated. Site Plan Comments: 1. Coordinate between the utility plan and site plan. See redlines for additional comments. Landscape Plan Comments: 1. Show the ID sign on the plan (in the location that corresponds to both the utility and site plan.) Utility Plan Comments: 1. Show the existing contours surrounding the property. It appears that off -site construction easements are possible for the construction along the north side of the property. Date: March 30, 2001 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 10 Plat R1 Site 2 Utility 121 Landscape 0 Drainage R port ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS 2. Show expanded patching and add the following note referencing the patching: Limits of street repair are approximate. Final limits to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City Street repair standards. 3_ Replace the General Notes on the utility plan with the attached General Notes. This is available in electronic format and should be used on all current projects that were not first submitted after March 1, 2001. 4. Remove the access ramps being shown on the driveway entrance of Wheaton Drive. Per the standard drawing detail, access ramps won't be created. 5. Note the telephone riser is to be relocated. Development Review Comments — Page 2 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: March 2, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #13-82CD Oakridge Business Park 341h Filing — NHA (National Healthcare Associates) — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: /'BAR e ►/, March 28, 2001 ❑ No Comment QProblems or Concerns (see below or :.:.ached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** �I O N c- OF O J ( Co rA w1 S W r S OCT-0Gcz & 18) Zc,vo H.4vc A'Dv--, a-e sse o 7HERE IF YOU MSH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Date: __ Signature: F-i�en^. 3F.dr-1J REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: March 2, 2001 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #13-82CD Oakridge Business Park 34" Filing — NHA (National Healthcare Associates) Type I I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: March 28, 2001 ElNo Comment ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site __ Drainage Report _ Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Date: _Signature:_ Affordable Housing �! r®®®l� Comment Sheet L� J Current Planning DATE: October 5, 2000 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #13-82CD Oakridge Business Park, 341h Filing, NHA Fort Collins — PDP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference (�CJ/JT�o� l`iun/d/�lt3�rs Ndr- �E�Su2ii3dJ ZD PL-,Qr is IV15s11V7 cukve5- l�� - �uui✓a-3� 3, t36 A1aT CC oScr. 7—/eA-C7-�9 7E) 7-r-44AJ IZA,1 % (!�" 19 !1� 7 ROL) . 4 ��, j GU 14 C A Ta -r/-rii� inJ L(26Ac 000'.S AJ,) rV7,47-,rt -T77-LL� 0r.i /-�2.,4-7— Signature — Date �L~� CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins 8 Fla+ �a�e c eas w0' tMa�� e�� u,P. Lrtse,,"e,-J3 G �avt5 Norl� 11v�e titee� WlvrC �iwir. Io be locai�OLLle- U +C> rgFrC)duc� � 0 0 8uq�S'e oF1'as 1 Affordable Housing Comment Sheet LL Current Planning DATE: October 5, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #13-82CD Oakridge Business Park, 34th Filing, NHA Fort Collins — PDP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs in Current Planning no later tban the staff review meeting: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference /�0 �/X !q Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other