Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE SECOND - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2010-09-10 (2)City of F6rt Collins urrent Planning PO Box 580 ` Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 * 970.224.6134 - fax DATE: December 15, 2008 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt PROJECT COMMENT SHEET # 43-08 NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE PHASE 2 PDP —TYPE 11 Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: December 31, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference P`�No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) �i Name (please pri►it) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other. _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Number: 112 Created: 1 /16/2009 [1/16/09] The overall site plan that was provided for the Parking Scheme Revisions (dated Dec. 17, 2008) is a better Overall Site Plan than the one with the current set of Site Plans. Response: The `Parking Scheme Revisions' sheet may have been a larger sheet size. An overall sheet has been provided for reference; however, to meet the required scale for the submittal multiple sheets are necessary. Number: 113 Created: 1 /16/2009 [1/16/09] Section 3.5.3(D) Character and Image, Section 3.5.4© Development Standards, and Section 3.5.5© Buildings all set forth building standards that must be met within the shopping center. There are some concerns primarily associated with the King Soopers building architecture and articulation and the fuel center canopy that we would like to further discuss with you. Response: The architecture of the overall development including the King Soopers building and fuel center canopy have been modified as discussed. Number: 114 Created: 1 /16/2009 [1/16/09] The general pedestrian circulation and flow in the shopping center, as proposed, is lacking as it relates to connectivity between buildings. Of primary concern is the apparent lack of any good pedestrian connection north - south in the center. Part of staffs concern relates to basically all of the pad sites having a drive-in component, making good pedestrian movement around the buildings difficult. Response: The pedestrian circulation throughout the development has been modified to improve the connectivity of pad and shop sites to the adjacent trail and sidewalk system and through the development. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 49 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Add wetland buffer- consistently, to all plan drawings. Response: Per a phone conversation with Dana on 3/23/09, the buffer is not shown on the plans. The Wetlands-PDP handles this issue and there was a late change to created wetlands adjacent to the northern wetland. A buffer may be shown should one be needed on a subsequent submittal. Number: 89 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add Limit of Development (LOD) Line to all plan drawings: Site, Landscape and all Utility plan drawings -Added LOD limits. Dana as discussed regarding your redlines, the LOD may not be in the location you suggested. Number: 94 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] All wetlands to be labeled "Wetlands per Wetlands PDP." -The wetlands have been labeled as requested. Page 4 Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 95 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Light spillage from north and east sides of the King Soopers building encroaches into Out Lot B, which is considered City owned property. Foot-candle levels shall be at 0.0 along the property boundaries adjacent to Out Lot B. Night light pollutions is not allowed to occur within the wetlands/natural areas adjacent to this development. Response: The boundaries of Out Lot B have been modified and the lighting adjusted to prevent light spillage onto City owned property. Number: 96 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Pole mounted fixtures A27, A28, A29, A30, A52 and D21 are required to have house side shields on fixtures as used on fixture F. This is required to reduce/eliminate potential impacts due to the fixture itself being visible from within the wetlands/natural areas. Response: The locations of the light poles has been modified and shields added to reduce lamp visibility from wetlands areas. Topic: Plat Number: 51 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Add note to Plat, Site plan and utilities : Refer to Section 3.4.(E) of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within a buffer zone. -Added Note Number: 88 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add following note to the plat: Pursuant to Section 12-122 of the Municipal Code, no person or property owner association shall create, cause to be created, enforce or seek to enforce any provision contained in any restrictive covenant which has the effect of prohibiting or limiting the installation or use of Xeriscape landscaping, solar/ photo -voltaic collectors (if mounted flush upon any established roof line), clothes lines (if located in back yards), or odor -controlled compost bins, or which has the effect of requiring that a portion of any individual lot be planted in turf grass. -Added Note Number: 97 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add buffer zone text to plat per redline comments. Dana as discussed regarding your redlines, this item was misses and will be picked up on a subsequent submittal. Topic: Site Plan Number: 52 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The pedestrian trail ends at the edge of the parking lot with no connectivity to any of the facilities within the shopping center. Consider realigning the walk so it directs people to the dominant structure in the center. The trail may continue within the buffer as needed with the same requirements as the Wetlands PDP. Page 5 Response: The sidewalk system throughout the development has been modified to improve the connectivity to the trail from the shopping center. Number: 53 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Consider eliminating the east end of Grape Street so that it is outside of the 100' buffer for the wetland. If impossible, change surface from gravel to a porous grass paver or similar material. Parking shall not be allowed within the 100' buffer zone along Grape Street. Add note on Site Plan to this effect. Response: Entire length is shown as asphalt. Number: 90 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Show complete improvements to east end of Grape Street. Is access from the northeast corner of the development necessary onto Grape Street? -The east entrance is necessary for emergency vehicle access and circuatlion. Response: The access points to Grape Street as shown are necessary for fire department access and through negotiations with adjacent property owners. Number: 91 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Parking is required to be 5 feet from property lines. Out Lot B is a separate parcel to be conveyed to the City. All parking and circulation drives adjacent to Out Lot B must meet the setback requirement. This is also an issue for parking and circulation next to Grape Street, which is City owned property. Response: The layout of the parking has been modified, an easement may be needed to accommodate the parking as shown. Number: 92 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] The existing conditions shall reflect the approved plans of the Wetlands PDP. -The wetlands PDP improvements are shown faded in the 2"d Filing Drawing set. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 99 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add tree protection notes to Sheet C-002. Refer to the demolition and landscape plans for the tree protection details. Change note #5 of the Standard Grading and Erosion and Sediment control construction plan Notes so that there is no conflict with the tree protection notes. The tree protection notes supersede this note. -Note #5 removed and tree protection notes added to Sheet C-002. Number: 101 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add note to C-002, "Refer to Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within a buffer zone." -Note Added Number: 102 Created: 1 /5/2009 Page 6 [1/5/09] On all plan drawings in set, the existing conditions shall reflect the approved plans for the Wetlands PDP, i.e.: final wetlands boundaries, grading, trees removed, wetland buffers, etc. -The wetlands PDP improvements are shown faded in the 2"d Filing Drawing set. Response: the Wetland PDP improvements are shown on the landscape plans ( with grading and plantings) and site plans (with grading) for reference. Number: 103 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] On Erosion Control Plan, sheet C-142, add silt fence per redline comment. -Silt fence has been added per the redlines as part of the 1st Filing Wetlands PDP. Number: 104 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add Silt Fence to Erosion Control Plan at top of retaining wall on west edge of the wetland adjacent to the King Soopers building. -The retaining wall is no longer incorporated into the design of the detention pond/wetland basin. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Engineering Number: 10 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] The TDR Fee did paid did not account for the .25 per square foot cost of building square footage. This amount totals an additional $41,895.50, but in applying the reduction factor in the fee schedule, the total TDR fee is calculated as $39,057.88, which with the previous payment of $6,220.25 leaves the existing balance due as $32,837.63. Response: Remaining fees to be paid with this submittal, Number: 11 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] On the construction plan set, please provide the consultant's signature block in accordance with LCUASS criteria. -Added Number: 12 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] A 2nd project benchmark should be added and referenced in the construction plan set. -Added Number: 13 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] On C-111 amend the reference to the roadway plans from "by others" to "Interwest Consulting Group" as redlined in order to reflect that the roadway plans are tied to the project. -Reference has been adjusted. Number: 14 Created: 12/26/2008 Page 7 [12/26/08] On all sheets, please have the right-of-way/property line clearly shown and featured. Also, please have the proposed utility easement behind the right-of- way similarly shown and featured. -ROW and property lines have been portrayed with a darker lineweight and additional labels have been added to all plans. Number: 15 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] Driveway approaches are required to be constructed in concrete within right-of-way up to the property line. Please ensure that concrete is shown up to the back of walk. (provide LCUASS detail 707). -All driveways will be constructed in concrete up to the property line as indicated on the plan set. The drive entrance east fo the existing restaurant and auto dealership will be constructed with the roadway improvements due to the curb line shift designed as part of that project. Number: 16 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] There is a section of sidewalk along College Avenue that falls outside of the right-of-way for College. As shown on the redlined plat, please either expand the right-of-way to include this area or have this area also dedicated as an access easement. -The ROW has been adjusted to incorporate the walkway. Number: 38 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] Starting on C-201 of the construction plans, please use a darker lineweight for some of the text in the profile view as it won't likely scan/reproduce well. -Utilities are no longer a part of the 2"d Filing PDP. Phasing is no longer necessary, therefore the utility profiles shown in the 1st Filing reflect proposed conditions with darker lineweights and text. Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] Will the street trees along College and Willox be part of the road project or be installed with the development? Response: There is some overlap for the street trees and associated street lawn. The landscape immediately adjacent to the development is to be design and irrigated by the developer. The landscape associated with medians, roundabout and opposite side of street are to be designed and installed with the road project. At this time the adjacent trees and lawn are to be installed with the road project as well. Number: 40 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The diagonal parking along the driveway that intersects with College is required to be setback from the flowline of College a distance of 100' per LCUASS detail 19-6. It appears that the first parking stall closest to College would need to be removed in conformance with this criteria. Response: The first parking stall has been removed to meet the required criteria. Page 8 Number: 41 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] Sheet 8 of the site plan identifies the use of a raised crosswalk at the intersection of a drive aisle and College Avenue. Was this intended? The use of a raised crosswalk at the intersection of a public street seems awkward and I'm not aware of its use in the City. Response: The crosswalk will not be raised but rather contain a different material, texture, or paint treatment. Number: 42 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] In conjunction with the previous comment, decorative (colored) concrete should not be used in public right-of-way. Response: Colored concrete has been removed from the public right-of-way. Number: 43 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] On both the site plan and the construction plan set, please label sidewalk widths both onsite and along public right-of-way. Also, please label raised crosswalks on the construction plan set. Construction details should be provided on how the raised crosswalks are to be built. -Sidewalk widths have been labeled. No raised crosswalks. Page 9 Number: 45 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The plat should be specifying an access easement internal to the site connecting to a public street and stubbing out to the north for where future development could connect to in order to assure access through the site. -Access easements have been provided connecting the Grape Street properties with College Avenue and Willox Lane. Number: 46 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] An access easement should also be specified for the bike/ped connection to the north. The design of this connection should be shown on all plans. -The pedestrian walkway design and corresponding easements have been provided in the 1st Filing plan set. The pedestrian bridge design and construction will occur with this 2"d Filing however the easement has been designated with the 1st Filing plat. Number: 47 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Technical Services provided the following comments: 1. Boundary closes. - See attached closures 2. Please add "Being a Replat Of' and Section, Township, Range information to the heading.- Added "Being a Replat of " to plat heading 3. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on site and landscape plans.- Will add dimension to first filing easements closer to final review 4. Bearing and distances missing. See redlines. (The plat needs to "stand by itself' and show all bearings and distances.) Will add closer to final review Page 10 Number: 48 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] I'd like to amend note #43 on the construction plan set, stating that the College and Willox improvements are designed by Interwest Consulting. -Reference has been adjusted. Number: 55 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Patching limits for the onsite portion of the project that takes place onto Willox should be further discussed and possibly coordinated with the road plans. Street cuts on Willox potentially are subject to triple impact fees for the street cuts as the roadway is currently within the 5 year time frame for the penalty. Given the amount of street cut shown, regardless of whether the impact fee is tripled, it may be worth pursuing an overlay of Willox (and potential coordination of this with the road project). The overlay would negate the assessment of a street cut fee. Erika Keeton should be contacted for further discussion regarding this. -This item has previously been discussed during the lot Filing PDP and determined that a permanent patch will be placed over utility trenches and an overlay will occur as part of the College Avenue and Willox Lane Roadway Improvements. Number: 79 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] With the development and its corresponding roadway improvements changing the access for the two properties southwest of the site, an access easement should be shown on the plat (similar to ID#45) linking the two drive aisles for each property out to Willox. -This will be addressed at the next submittal. Number: 80 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] Prior to a hearing for this PDP, we should receive written acknowledgement from the two owners of the two out parcels (restaurant and car dealership) on how this project will impact their existing businesses and will grant the developer access onto their property for the work pertaining to the internal drive aisle and access. -Noted Number: 84 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] There are a couple of instances where the internal drive aisles shift across an intersection that seems awkward where drivers might hit landscape median. (As internal drive aisle design is not an Engineering concern, this is more of an observation rather than a comment.) Response: The drive aisle alignment has been modified to improve alignment. Number: 85 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] The legal description shown on the site plan should just be the corresponding title of the plat instead of the metes and bounds description since the PDP is being platted. Response: Metes and bounds description removed. Number: 86 Created: 1 /2/2009 Page 11 [1/2/09] The plat, landscape, site, and construction plan set should have the title of the documents all coordinated in the same manner. The plat is titled "North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing" which works well in being consistent with the title of the previous plat for the wetlands. North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing should be the title on all the documents (and if desired, additional info can be added to the end of the title such as "North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing, King Soopers".) -This plan set is titled North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing Number: 87 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] We should have further dialogue regarding Grape Street and how the proposed development affects its legal status. As Grape Street is apparently not right-of-way but owned by the City, the City may take the position that with the proposed development and change to the access control plan, that there is no benefit in the City owning the property either in fee or as right-of-way. The timing of the City potentially abandoning Grape Street would need to then be coordinated with the project's entitlement accordingly. -Concur, further discussions are necessary to resolve the Grape Street status prior to final design. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 65 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Most of these comments I also made during the Preliminary Design Review and the ODP processes. I'll repeat them now, and also add two new comments, for the purpose of documentation. Number: 66 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable). PLEASE NOTE: The structures that are located closest to College Avenue may be required to have address numerals mounted on the street side of the building (College Avenue side and also another side of the building, if the main entrance is not on the College Avenue side of the building. 97UFC901.4.4 Response: Noted and a note to be added under Standard Notes on the Cover Sheet on subsequent submittal. Number: 67 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] RADIO AMPLIFICATION: New buildings greater than 50,000 SF shall be equipped with an approved public -safety radio communication amplification system. The system shall be designed and installed in accordance with criteria established by the Fire Code official based on the capabilities and communication features of emergency services. PFA Fire Prevention Bureau Administrative Policy 07-01 Response: Noted and a note to be added under Standard Notes on the Cover Sheet on subsequent submittal. Page 12 Number: 68 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] TURNING RADII: Minimum turning radii for emergency -response apparatus on any fire apparatus roadway is 25 feet inside, 50 feet outside. UFC 902.2.2.3 -Minimum turning radii criteria are met. Number: 69 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] HMIA: Thank you for submitting the Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis. Please be sure an additional copy is submitted to the Fort Collins Building Services Department, if it has not been already. Response: To be delivered as requested. Number: 70 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] FUEL CANOPY CLEARANCE: Minimum clearance for the canopy/canopies for the fueling station is 14 feet above grade. Response: The minimum anticipated clearance at the fuel station canopy is 15'- 6". Number: 71 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] REQUIRED ACCESS: PLEASE NOTE: The preliminary plate was great from a fire -protection standpoint. The EAEs shown on the plat were spot on. Thank you. I recommend that you contact me during the construction process so we can determine fire lane sign placement and red curb paint location in advance. Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFA's jurisdiction when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route (from a public street) around the exterior of the building or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: ❑ Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites. ❑ Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable. ❑ Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. ❑ Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane (30 feet for buildings three or more stories in height). ❑ A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. If a fire lane is not provided, all buildings out of access (exceeding the 150-foot requirement) shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire -sprinkler system. 97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 -Acknowledged Page 13 JAZOM Project Comments Sheet &600011: Ci of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: January 5, 2009 Project: NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE - PHASE 2 PDP - TYPE II All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: December 31, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Engineering Number: 10 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] The TDR Fee did paid did not account for the .25 per square foot cost of building square footage. This amount totals an additional $41,895.50, but in applying the reduction factor in the fee schedule, the total TDR fee is calculated as $39,057.88, which with the previous payment of $6,220.25 leaves the existing balance due as $32,837.63. Number: 11 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] On the construction plan set, please provide the consultant's signature block in accordance with LCUASS criteria. Number: 12 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] A 2nd project benchmark should be added and referenced in the construction plan set. Number: 13 1 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08) On C-111 amend the reference to the roadway plans from "by others" to "Interwest Consulting Group" as redlined in order to reflect that the roadway plans are tied to the project. Number: 14 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] On all sheets, please have the right-of-way/property line clearly shown and featured. Also, please have the proposed utility easement behind the right-of-way similarly shown and featured. / O Date NECK HEWS YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS y Pat , Site Drainage Report Other tili/ ty —Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number: 72 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: The King Soopers structure is required to be equipped with an approved, automatic fire -sprinkler system. Response: Generally noted on the Cover Sheet. Number: 73 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: Proposed buildings exceeding 5,000 square feet for type V construction shall be fire contained or fire sprinklered. 97UBC Table9-B (City of Fort Collins Amendment) Response: Generally noted on the Cover Sheet. Number: 74 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. -All fire lines are 6" DIP and designed as part of the 1t Filing PDP. Number: 75 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: Fire department connections shall be installed remote from the buildings, and located on the street or fire lane side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. If possible, a fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of the FDC. PFA Bureau Policy -FDCs will be indicated on the 18t Filing PDP as part of the next submittal. Number: 76 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] KNOX BOX REQUIRED: PLEASE NOTE: PFA might require more than one Knox Box for the King Soopers building, due to its size. Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC 902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20 Response: Noted. Number: 77 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] WATER SUPPLY: PLEASE NOTE: Contact me if you want to discuss specific locations of and questions regarding fire hydrants. Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include: • Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter • Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter Page 14 • Residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter. These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 97UFC 901.2.2.2 -Noted Number: 78 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] TANK PERMITS: Just a reminder that PFA requires permits to be issued when installing and/or removing underground fuel tanks, and requires that two sets of plans be submitted for review. Plans must show the layout of the USTs, number of tanks, size and construction materials. -Noted and will be addressed during final design. Number: 59 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The 8-foot bicycle lane coming from the north should connect to the front walkway along the King Sooper's building. Any connection through parking areas should include ADA ramps and crosswalk striping. Response: The pedestrian and bicycle circulation systems have been improved throughout the site to provide access between the various buildings. Number: 60 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The internal sidewalk network should be revised to show crossings where needed. The ADA ramps should be directional instead of flared. Response: Crossings have been added where necessary and flared walks adjusted to directional where possible. Page 15 Topic: Site Plan Number: 61 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Please see my redlines for concerns and potential solutions regarding connectivity with the internal sidewalk system. Response: The internal sidewalk system has been modified to improve connectivity. Number: 62 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Bicycle parking locations and rack details should be included in the plans. Parking should be located on a hard surface as close to the building entrance as possible. Covered or indoor parking is encouraged where possible. Response: Bicycle parking locations are noted via a symbol on the landscape drawings. Number: 63 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Please use a consistent cross -hatch, shading or other method to indicate where the sidewalks and crosswalks are located. Sidewalk width should also be noted on the plans. Response: Sidewalk width has been noted and shading methods simplified. Response: For reference, circulation has been shaded on the overall site plan (Sheet 2 of 22). Number: 64 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The sidewalks running through the parking islands should be located to ensure a clear path free from vehicle overhang or other encroachments. Response: The parking islands containing the sidewalks have been increased in width to accommodate vehicle overahang and other encroachments. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 37 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show water and sewer mains and services on the landscape plan and locate the trees and shrubs to provide the required separations from water and sewer lines. Response: Utilities shown. Generally, plant material separations are maintained. Additional plants may need to be slightly adjusted closer to final review. Topic: Plat Number: 30 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show the easement for the existing 6-inch sanitary. A portion of this easement (north of the new MH to be installed) is to be abandoned. If no easement exists, include an easement on Lt 5 for the portion of the sewer that is to remain plus 15 feet north of the proposed MH. -No existing easement found. Easement added per the 1st Filing PDP. Number: 31 Created: 12/29/2008 Page 16 [12/29/08] Increase the total width of the utility easement across Lt 2 (where the water main is being added) to 35 feet. -Width has been adjusted per the tat Filing PDP. Number: 32 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Sewer service lines are privately maintained and do not need to be in utility easements. Curb stops must be in utility easements. - Easement over sewer services has been removed per the 18t Filing PDP Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 81 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] The main issue before the PDP can go to a public hearing is providing the required water quality treatment for the entire site before the drainage enters the wetland that the City will own. Per the meeting on Monday, December 22nd, some possible solutions were discussed on how to provide the required water quality mitigation. Please provide a revised plan to the City once completed. We can meet before the next submittal to help expedite the process in regards to this issue. If a PLD or forbay is proposed that extends into the wetland, that land will need to be platted as part of the private property, and not the land the City will own. -Various conversations and meetings have resulted in a design that provides full water quality treatment prior to entrance into the detention pond/wetland basin through porous landscape detention islands and a water quality pond. This design is provided in the first filing submittal. Number: 82 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] There is no more major comments that need to be addressed before the hearing besides comment 81. During final compliance review, a detailed review will take place of the site grading, erosion control mesures, and all hydraulics. I did review the hydraulics that was submitted, and found no comments. -Noted Number: 83 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] Please provide the HGL on the storm sewer profiles at final compliance. Remember the maximum parking lot ponding is 1 foot. The inlet calcs show you are meeting this requirement. -Provided per the 1t Filing PDP. Department: Stonmwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 17 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Sheet C-002 includes reference to "Loveland GMA". -Adjusted Page 17 Number: 18 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Label size of all water and sewer services and fire lines. -Labeled per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 19 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Label all valves, fittings, curb stops, meter pits, etc., etc. on the water main plans. -Labeled per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 20 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Locate the curb stops and meter pits in landscaped areas near the water mains. -Adjusted per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 21 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Provide a minimum of 10 feet of separation between the water mains and the underdrains. -The underdrain has been relocated to provide requested separation per the 1st Filing PDP. Number: 22 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Add the water main connection to College Avenue and the connection to the main in Grape Street.. -A connection has been provided from the interior of the site to the 6" water main located in College Avenue and the 6" water main located in Grape Street per the 1st Filing PDP. Number: 23 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show the portion of the existing water main in College that is to be abandoned. Add notes to coordinate the abandonment with City Water Utility. "Call Fort Collins Utilities (416-2165) to coordinate the abandonment". -A blow up has been provided on the demolition plan and note added per the 1st Filing PDP. Number: 24 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show the existing water services to 1404 and 1406 N College and the south side of Grape Street. Add notes on abandonment similar to previous comment. -Services shown and note added per the 1st Filing PDP. Number: 25 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Move the water service and fire line for Lt 3 onto Lt 3. -Adjusted per the 1st Filing PDP Page 18 Number: 26 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Add an enlarged detail for the fire hydrant to be installed at the west end of the existing 6-inch water main in Grape. -Added per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 27 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show the curb stop and meter pit for Lt 2. -Shown per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 28 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Label all water main lowerings and include a table to supplement the lowering details as noted for the "Wetlands PDP" submittal. -Added per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 29 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Add the tracer wire details for PVC water mains (Std Details 25 and 30). -Added per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 33 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Irrigation taps? -Added per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 34 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Replace the existing MH where the proposed sewer connects to the existing sewer. -Adjusted per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 35 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Minimum cover for a sanitary sewer is 4 feet. -Adjusted to provide the minimum cover required per the 1st Filing PDP Number: 36 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] See redlined plans for other comments/questions. -Noted Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] Remove sign details from drawings. Signs must comply with the sign code. Since the property is not in the residential neighborhood sign district, signs are reviewed only at time of sign permit application. Showing signs now will give the wrong impression that the signs will be ok, but that's not known yet. i.e. the monument sign Page 19 shown might comply, but until we know exact location we don't know for sure. So remove all signs. Response: All sign details have been removed. Number: 2 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] In addition to the site plan sheets submitted, an overall site plan should be provided at a smaller scale showing the entire site on one sheet. It makes it much easier to reference to ensure that nothing is missed. The site plan sheets submitted with this round are difficult to review since parts of buildings are continued on the next sheet. Also, it would be helpful to label the buildings in some manner (i.e. bldg 1, 2, 3, etc.). Response: A simplified overall site plan is provided (Sheet 2 of 22) Number: 3 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] Show the dimensions of the width of the handicap parking spaces and abutting aisle. Some of the spaces are dimensioned and others aren't. Some buildings don't appear to have handicap spaces, i.e. the buildings on sheet 12. There must be handicap parking spaces located as close as possible to building entrances. Response: Handicap parking spaces have been dimensioned. Number: 4 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] The land use table on the cover sheet should provide more specific information regarding the proposed uses. "Commercial" is too broad a term. Response: Additional uses listed. Number: 5 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] The land use table indicates that the maximum building height is 5 stories. That is the max allowed in the zone, but unless you're proposing 5 story buildings, it should be changed to indicate the maximum height you're actually proposing. Response: Changed to 2 story. Number: 6 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] Indicate colors of the fuel canopy on the elevation drawings. Response: Colors of fuel canopy and other building elements have been noted. Number: 7 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] provide standard notes on cover sheet regarding such things as shielded, down -directional lighting, mechanical screening, trash enclosure material. Note on lighting must also state that under -canopy fueling areas shall feature flush -mounted, flat lens light fixtures. Response: The photometric plans have been updated, fuel canopy lighting is flush mounted except for those fixtures over the fuel pumps. Those utilize directional lamps to focus the light on the pumps, reducing light spillage. Response: General standard notes have been added to the Cover Sheet. Additional items may be added closer to final review. Page 20 Number: 8 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] Show wall -mounted light fixture locations on building elevations. The lighting plan indicates some wall fixtures on the King Soopers building, but only on the rear and north side. Does that mean that there won't be any on the front of the building? Response: Wall mounted light fixtures have been shown on the building elevations and photometric plans. Number: 9 Created: 12/22/2008 [12/22/08] With the site plan broken up on numerous sheets, its not east to confirm that there aren't more than 15 parking spaces in a row, without an intervening landscape island. Please make sure that parking rows are limited to no more than 15 spaces without such an island. Response: The number of parking stalls has been confirmed, shopping cart storage areas have also been shown. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Red -lined plans from City departments are included with this comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. At the staff review meeting on December 31st it was determined that another round of staff review is necessary. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being January 16, 2009) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached REVISION ROUTING SHEET. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City's Project Planner cc: Marc Virata Dana Leavitt Loveland Commercial BHA Design AYRES Associates Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. Current Planning file #39-08 Page 21 Parcel name: BOUNDARY SUB 2ND North: 1446215.2014 East: 3111292.3409 Line Course: N 00-41-23 E Length: 141.9709 North: 1446357.1620 East: 3111294.0500 Line Course: N 89-34-37 W Length: 222.4999 North: 1446358.8050 East: 3111071.5562 Line Course: N 14-10-30 E Length: 31.4778 North: 1446389.3244 East: 3111079.2647 Line Course: N 05-21-53 E Length: 124.6542 North: 1446513.4326 East: 3111090.9191 Line Course: N 00-41-23 E Length: 117.1640 North: 1446630.5881 East : 3111092.3295 Line Course: N 20-06-57 W Length: 33.7838 North: 1446662.3111 East: 3111080.7106 Line Course: N 00-41-23 E Length: 388.2439 North: 1447050.5268 East: 3111085.3844 Line Course: S 89-23-30 E Length: 530.7657 North: 1447044.8921 East: 3111616.1201 Line Course: S 45-25-43 E Length: 21.9689 North: 1447029.4744 East: 3111631.7702 Line Course: S 00-07-23 W Length: 92.2660 North: 1446937.2086 East: 3111631.5721 Line Course: S 89-44-46 E Length: 81.9979 North: 1446936.8453 East: 3111713.5691 Line Course: S 00-00-00 W Length: 6.6952 North: 1446930.1502 East: 3111713.5691 Line Course: N 89-59-52 E Length: 265.2358 North: 1446930.1601 East: 3111978.8049 Line Course: S 44-44-43 E Length: 134.8944 North: 1446834.3523 East: 3112073.7648 Curve Length:47.9085 Radius:61.0000 Delta:44-59-57 Tangent:25.2665 Chord: 46.6866 Course: S 22-14-45 E Course In: S 45-15-17 W Course Out: S 894446 E RP North: 1446791.4109 East: 3112030.4400 End North: 1446791.1407 East : 3112091.4394 Line Course: S 00-15-14 W Length: 7.5822 North: 1446783.5585 East: 3112091.4058 Line Course: S 90-00-00 E Length: 41.2139 North: 1446783.5585 East: 3112132.6197 Line Course: S 00-00-00 E Length: 36.5437 North: 1446747.0148 East: 3112132.6197 Line Course: S 14-01-39 W Length: 26.4271 North: 1446721.3758 East: 3112126.2140 Line Course: S 16-17-45 E Length: 38.7035 North: 1446684.2272 East : 3112137.0741 Line Course: S 15-25-57 W Length: 49.2323 North: 1446636.7699 East: 3112123.9733 Line Course: S 19-19-58 E Length: 54.4045 North: 1446585.4333 East: 3112141.9842 Line Course: S 17-47-27 W Length: 53.1080 North: 1446534.8650 East : 3112125.7575 Line Course: S 14-44-19 E Length: 48.4480 North: 1446488.0111 East: 3112138.0832 Line Course: S 22-08-50 W Length: 39.8239 North: 1446451.1256 East: 3112123.0700 Line Course: S 23-04-00 E Length: 34.9757 North: 1446418.9462 East: 3112136.7736 Line Course: S 00-03-25 E Length: 209.8943 North: 1446209.0520 East: 3112136.9821 Page 22 Line Course: N 89-34-58 W Length: 454.2953 North: 1446212.3594 East: 3111682.6988 Curve Length:42.0963 Radius:85.0000 Delta:28-22-33 Tangent:21.4892 Chord: 41.6675 Course: N 58-22-25 W Course In: N 17-26-19 E Course Out: S 45-48-51 W RP North: 1446293.4527 East: 3111708.1718 End North: 1446234.2089 East : 3111647.2196 Line Course: N 44-11-09 W Length: 29.1756 North:1446255.1303 East:3111626.8846 Curve Length:37.5845 Radius:85.0000 Delta:25-20-04 Tangent:19.1045 Chord: 37.2791 Course: N 31-31-06 W Course In: N 45-48-51 E Course Out: S 71-08-56 W RP North: 1446314.3741 East : 3111687.8368 End North: 1446286.9096 East: 3111607.3962 Line Course: N 89-34-58 W Length: 65.7800 North: 1446287.3885 East: 3111541.6179 Curve Length:49.4535 Radius:85.0000 Delta:33-20-06 Tangent:25.4487 Chord: 48.7589 Course: S 21-33-07 W Course In: N 85-06-56 W Course Out: S 51-46-50 E RP North: 1446294.6259 East: 3111456.9266 End North: 1446242.0385 East : 3111523.7066 Line Course: S 38-13-10 W Length: 7.6238 North: 1446236.0489 East: 3111518.9899 Curve Length:34.9416 Radius:85.0000 Delta:23-33-11 Tangent:17.7211 Chord: 34.6961 Course: S 49-59-45 W Course In: N 51-46-50 W Course Out: S 28-13-39 E RP North: 1446288.6362 East : 3111452.2099 End North: 1446213.7448 East : 3111492.4128 Line Course: N 89-34-58 W Length: 200.0771 North: 1446215.2014 East: 3111292.3409 Perimeter: 3802.9115 Area: 766,690 sq. ft. 17.601 acres Page 23 Number: 15 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] Driveway approaches are required to be constructed in concrete within right-of- way up to the property line. Please ensure that concrete is shown up to the back of walk. (provide LCUASS detail 707). Number: 16 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] There is a section of sidewalk along College Avenue that falls outside of the right-of-way for College. As shown on the redlined plat, please either expand the right-of- way to include this area or have this area also dedicated as an access easement. Number: 38 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] Starting on C-201 of the construction plans, please use a darker lineweight for some of the text in the profile view as it won't likely scan/reproduce well. Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] Will the street trees along College and Willox be part of the road project or be installed with the development? Number: 40 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The diagonal parking along the driveway that intersects with College is required to be setback from the flowline of College a distance of 100' per LCUASS detail 19-6. It appears that the first parking stall closest to College would need to be removed in conformance with this criteria. Number: 41 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] Sheet 8 of the site plan identifies the use of a raised crosswalk at the intersection of a drive aisle and College Avenue. Was this intended? The use of a raised crosswalk at the intersection of a public street seems awkward and I'm not aware of its use in the City. Number: 42 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] In conjunction with the previous comment, decorative (colored) concrete should not be used in public right-of-way. Number: 43 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] On both the site plan and the construction plan set, please label sidewalk widths both onsite and along public right-of-way. Also, please label raised crosswalks on the construction plan set. Construction details should be provided on how the raised crosswalks are to be built. Number: 44 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The following comments pertain to the College/Willox plans. As these are separate from the development and also managed by City Engineering - Capital Projects, these comments should be viewed as input rather than requirements -- I will defer to the Capital Projects folks: 1. I'm understanding that the use of hardscape splashblock along Willox and College may be viewed as a walkable surface from an ADA standpoint. If such is the case, the entire surface including the access ramps off the standard sidewalk would need to meet ADA requirements (such that for example, flared access ramps could not be used.) 2. It appears that an offsite easement will be needed from the Albertson's shopping center for the construction of the southern driveway approach leg of the roundabout. Page 2 REVISION Citvof Fort Collins Pl anning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET PoBoX580 Fore Collins. Co 80522-058D Fax: 970-4/0-2020 DATE: March 27, 2009 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt M1( #43-08 North College Market Place 2nd Filing PDP Type II $ou N a A-0-`{ 0,1,0 S Z--5 , Z, ;5CA-N a1 t o J& 15SIA C S Q Ili 1j I TE I L.Pr U 1>sCAr-?6 t o r/ C I 'r'Y Pz_4 j S. 2nd Round of Review 14 PLEASE NOTE: ce wrI L. I -r le Pt AW S H AkJ & ¢Z- o I -Pes 4 8 &J r�JGefta Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff(5e-e review meeting: 5l E6 t oz ) fax -4 ( M P► A t04r-)0.6*rr5 Pl. 4wA.l S 5K rw t) $. M • 47�0 J �! C 22 cc.TL y . APRIL 8, 2009 (s` Note -Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems K Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Name (#lease print, CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility )C Redline Utility XLandscape City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: April 9, 2009 Project: NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE, SECOND FILING - TYPE II Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Engineering Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] It should be verified that the road scope of work is coordinated. [12/30/081 Will the street trees along College and Willox be part of the road project or be installed with the development? Number: 45 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] Access and emergency access easement should also be shown on the plat for the drive aisle east of building D that connects to the Grape Street area so a loop is provided. [12/30/08] The plat should be specifying an access easement internal to the site connecting to a public street and stubbing out to the north for where future development could connect to in order to assure access through the site. Number: 46 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] Carried over pending further outcome on the bridge situation. [12/30/08] An access easement should also be specified for the bike/ped connection to the north. The design of this connection should be shown on all plans. Number: 47 Created: 12/31 /2008 [4/8/09] Technical Services has provided the following updated comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Scanning issues on site, landscape & utility plans. 3. All easements need to be locatable - add bearings & distances. 4. Filing #2 construction plans have benchmark 42-01 described incorrect. 5. College & Willox improvement plans shows benchmark 4201 incorrectly. [12/31/08] Technical Services provided the following comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Please add "Being a Replat Of' and Section, Township, Range information to the heading. 3. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on site and landscape plans. 4. Bearing and distances missing. See redlines. (The plat needs to "stand by itself' and show all bearings and distances.) Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number: 80 Created: 1 /2/2009 [4/7/09] It was indicated at staff review that access to North College Motors from within the property is not being provided at this time and they will continue their access onto Willox. Please revise the drawings to reflect this and as a result, show that no letter of intent for work on the North College Motors is needed. [1/2/09] Prior to a hearing for this PDP, we should receive written acknowledgement from the two owners of the two out parcels (restaurant and car dealership) on how this project will impact their existing businesses and will grant the developer access onto their property for the work pertaining to the internal drive aisle and access. Number: 84 Created: 1/2/2009 [4/7/09] The offset across drive aisles such that a vehicle may be more pre -disposed to hit a landscaped island is still there, especially at the main drive aisle off College. In addition, the revised parking lot design shows that almost all the east -west drive aisles now do not line up across the main north -south drive aisle (when they had previously). While again, this really isn't jurisdictionally under Engineering but under Planning and Zoning instead, I have quite a bit of concern on the parking lot layout for the folks who intend to use it. I'd like to see some feedback from the consultant's engineer and/or traffic engineer addressing whether the design is of a safety concern. "Note: The City internally had further discussion on the parking lot design on 4/9. The overall consensus is that the parking lot design was viewed as awkward and likely problematic for the end user. With that said, Engineering won't claim jurisdiction over the matter and won't look to review the parking lot design any further. [1/2/09] There are a couple of instances where the internal drive aisles shift across an intersection that seem awkward where drivers might hit landscape median. (As internal drive aisle design is not an Engineering concern, this is more of an observation rather than a comment.) Number: 87 Created: 1 /5/2009 [4/7/09] Carried over for further discussion. [1/5/09] We should have further dialogue regarding Grape Street and how the proposed development affects its legal status. As Grape Street is apparently not right-of-way but owned by the City, the City may take the position that with the proposed development and change to the access control plan, that there is no benefit in the City owning the property either in fee or as right-of-way. The timing of the City potentially abandoning Grape Street would need to then be coordinated with the project's entitlement accordingly. Number: 132 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] On the construction plan set, the utilities shown that are to be built with the 1 st filing should be faded back rather than appear prominent. On Sheet C-111 for example much of the sheet should be "reversed" in that the parking lots and drive aisles should be emphasized while the utilities should be shown in the same lineweight as the parking lots and drive aisles. On the utility sheets, everything built with the 1 st filing should be faded. Number: 133 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The construction and site plan drawings should clearly discern what improvements are to be done specifically with the 2nd ding from the 1 st filing (such as a portion of sidewalk on Willox and a drive approach) and the road project. Page 2 p STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins David Kasprzak Date: 4/10/2009 BHA Design, Inc. 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE, SECOND FILING - TYPE 2, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 95 Created: 1/5/2009 [4/7/09] Plan still shows spillage beyond property line in several locations. Add the correct property line to the plan, per comments on the redline. It is very difficult to read the fixture number with the foot-candle numbers superimposed on the fixture number. [1/5/09] Light spillage from north and east sides of the King Soopers building encroaches into Out Lot B, which is considered City owned property. Foot-candle levels shall be at 0.0 along the property boundaries adjacent to Out Lot B. Night light pollutions is not allowed to occur within the wetlands/natural areas adjacent to this development. Number: 96 Created: 1/5/2009 [4/7/09] Luminaire schedule does not identify said fixtures as having a house side shield. [1/5/09] Pole mounted fixtures A27, A28, A29, A30, A52 and D21 are required to have houseside shields on fixtures as used on fixture F. This is required to reduce/eliminate potential impacts due to the fixture itself being visible from within the wetlands/natural areas. Topic: Site Plan Number: 53 Created: 12/31 /2008 [4/7/09] Provide documents and graphic of driveway access location demonstrating no other alternative to extend Grape Street. [12/31/08] Consider eliminating the east end of Grape Street so that it is outside of the 100' buffer for the wetland. If impossible, change surface from gravel to a porous grass paver or similar material. Parking shall not be allowed within the 100' buffer zone along Grape Street. Add note on Site Plan to this effect. Number: 90 Created: 1/5/2009 [4/7/09] Per previous comment, demonstrate no other alternative for this location. The access to Grape Street could be moved to the west outside of the buffer. [1/5/09] Show complete improvements to east end of Grape Street. Is access from the northeast corner of the development necessary onto Grape Street? Page 1 Number: 91 Created: 1 /5/2009 [4/7/09] Will need to address with Steve Olt. [1/5/09] Parking is required to be 5 feet from property lines. Out Lot B is a separate parcel to be conveyed to the City. All parking and circulation drives adjacent to Out Lot B must meet the setback requirement. This is also an issue for parking and circulation next to Grape Street, which is City -owned property. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Engineering Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] It should be verified that the road scope of work is coordinated. [12/30/08] Will the street trees along College and Willox be part of the road project or be installed with the development? Number: 45 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] Access and emergency access easement should also be shown on the plat for the drive aisle east of building D that connects to the Grape Street area so a loop is provided. [12/30/081 The plat should be specifying an access easement internal to the site connecting to a public street and stubbing out to the north for where future development could connect to in order to assure access through the site. Number: 46 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] Carried over pending further outcome on the bridge situation. [12/30/08] An access easement should also be specified for the bike/ped connection to the north. The design of this connection should be shown on all plans. Number: 47 Created: 12/31 /2008 [4/8/09] Technical Services has provided the following updated comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Scanning issues on site, landscape & utility plans. 3. All easements need to be locatable - add bearings & distances. 4. Filing #2 construction plans have benchmark 42-01 described incorrect. 5. College & Willox improvement plans shows benchmark 4201 incorrectly. [12/31/08] Technical Services provided the following comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Please add "Being a Replat Of' and Section, Township, Range information to the heading. 3. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on site and landscape plans. 4. Bearing and distances missing. See redlines. (The plat needs to "stand by itself' and show all bearings and distances.) Page 2 Number: 80 Created: 1/2/2009 [4/7/09] It was indicated at staff review that access to North College Motors from within the property is not being provided at this time and they will continue their access onto Willox. Please revise the drawings to reflect this and as a result, show that no letter of intent for work on the North College Motors is needed. [1/2/09] Prior to a hearing for this PDP, we should receive written acknowledgement from the two owners of the two out parcels (restaurant and car dealership) on how this project will impact their existing businesses and will grant the developer access onto their property for the work pertaining to the internal drive aisle and access. Number: 84 Created: 1/2/2009 [4/7/09] The offset across drive aisles such that a vehicle may be more pre -disposed to hit a landscaped island is still there, especially at the main drive aisle off College. In addition, the revised parking lot design shows that almost all the east -west drive aisles now do not line up across the main north -south drive aisle (when they had previously). While again, this really isn't jurisdictionally under Engineering but under Planning and Zoning instead, I have quite a bit of concern on the parking lot layout for the folks who intend to use it. I'd like to see some feedback from the consultant's engineer and/or traffic engineer addressing whether the design is of a safety concern. "Note: The City internally had further discussion on the parking lot design on 4/9. The overall consensus is that the parking lot design was viewed as awkward and likely problematic for the end user. With that said, Engineering won't claim jurisdiction over the matter and won't look to review the parking lot design any further. [1/2/09] There are a couple of instances where the internal drive aisles shift across an intersection that seem awkward where drivers might hit landscape median. (As internal drive aisle design is not an Engineering concern, this is more of an observation rather than a comment.) Number: 87 Created: 1/5/2009 [4/7/09] Carried over for further discussion. [1/5/09] We should have further dialogue regarding Grape Street and how the proposed development affects its legal status. As Grape Street is apparently not right-of-way but owned by the City, the City may take the position that with the proposed development and change to the access control plan, that there is no benefit in the City owning the property either in fee or as right-of-way. The timing of the City potentially abandoning Grape Street would need to then be coordinated with the project's entitlement accordingly. Number: 132 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] On the construction plan set, the utilities shown that are to be built with the 1 st filing should be faded back rather than appear prominent. On Sheet C-111 for example much of the sheet should be "reversed" in that the parking lots and drive aisles should be emphasized while the utilities should be shown in the same lineweight as the parking lots and drive aisles. On the utility sheets, everything built with the 1 st filing should be faded. Page 3 Number: 133 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The construction and site plan drawings should clearly discern what improvements are to be done specifically with the 2nd filing from the 1 st filing (such as a portion of sidewalk on Willox and a drive approach) and the road project. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Justin Fields Topic: General Number: 115 [3/30/09] No Comments. Created: 3/30/2009 Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 71 Created: 12/31/2008 [4/8/09] Per our discussion at Staff Review, an addition to the EAE should be made to the loop drive aisle around Building D, particularly if the FDC is on the east side of the building. [12/31/08] REQUIRED ACCESS: PLEASE NOTE: The preliminary plate was great from a fire -protection standpoint. The EAEs shown on the plat were spot on. Thank you. I recommend that you contact me during the construction process so we can determine fire lane sign placement and red curb paint location in advance. Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFA's jurisdiction when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route (from a public street) around the exterior of the building or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: ❑ Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites. ❑ Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable. ❑ Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. ❑ Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane (30 feet for buildings three or more stories in height). ❑ A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. If a fire lane is not provided, all buildings out of access (exceeding the 150-foot requirement) shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire -sprinkler system. 97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 Number: 77 Created: 12/31/2008 [4/8/09] Per our discussion at Staff Review, we need to meet and also include Roger Buffington, so we can determine hydrant locations that will optimize firefighting operations and also meet Water requirements. [12/31/08] WATER SUPPLY: PLEASE NOTE: Contact me if you want to discuss specific locations of and questions regarding fire hydrants. Page 4 Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include: • Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter • Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter • Residential outside Urban Growth Area,500 gpat farther than 400 feet to the building, on centers cO enrs therepsi al pressure, spaced not afte These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 97UFC 901.2.2.2 Number: 134 Created: 4/8/2009 BOLLARDS: Please see 2006 IFC Section 312 Vehicle Impact Protection for requirements for bollards around hydrants and other fire devices. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Matt Wempe Topic: General Number: 116 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] Please specify the type of bicycle racks proposed. Number: 124 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] At the southeast corner of the intersection of College and Willox, please see the construction plans for redlines regarding hatching along the bicycle lane east of College. I have also forwarded this comment to Matt Baker in Engineering. Topic: Site Plan Number: 117 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] No sidewalks are shown around Pad 1, though bicycle parking and ADA ramps are located nearby. Please show any sidewalks proposed on both Sheet 2 and the other detailed site plan, civil plan, and landscaping plan sheets. Number: 118 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] Please use a consistent shading or cross -hatch for the sidewalks. This comment was partially addressed in the last round of review. Number: 119 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] Please see the site plan for redlines on bicycle parking locations. Bicycle parking cannot impede pedestrian flow or block ADA ramps. Number: 120 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The bicycle parking around Building A is not located near a main entrance. Please relocate or add additional bicycle parking around this building. Page 5 Number: 121 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] No bicycle parking is shown for Pad 3. Please relocate or add additional bicycle parking around this pad. N b • 122 Created: 4/7/2009 um %,I [4/7/09] Please relocate or add additional bicycle parking near the main entrance of King Soopers. There are currently eight spaces on the north entrance and only four near the main south entrance. Number: 123 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The key map on the pedestrian bridge detail sheet in the civil plans does not match the current site plan. Number: 125 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The construction plans for the Willox roundabout show a median extending onto the King Soopers property. A pedestrian crossing is located within the public right-of-way. The site plan shows the same median, but with another pedestrian crossing on the north end of the median. My suggestion is to use the south pedestrian crossing that is part of the roundabout (in the public right-of-way) and not extend the internal sidewalk on the west side of the access drive past this crossing. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 82 Created: 1 /2/2009 [4/10/09] Comment 81 resolved. PDP can go to a hearing. [1/2/09] There is no more major comments that need to be addressed before the hearing besides comment 81. During final compliance review, a detailed review will take place of the site grading, erosion control measures, and all hydraulics. I did review the hydraulics that was submitted, and found no comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 12/19/2008 [3/30/09] The sign detail for the King Soopers fuel price sign is still shown on Sheet 2 of the architectural elevation drawings. Remove from drawings with final plan compliance. [12/19/081 Remove sign details from drawings. Signs must comply with the sign code. Since the property is not in the residential neighborhood sign district, signs are reviewed only at time of sign permit application. Showing signs now will give the wrong impression that the signs will be ok, but that's not known yet. i.e. the monument sign shown might comply, but until we know exact location we don't know for sure. So remove all signs. Page 6 Number: 2 Created: 12/19/2008 [3/30/09] At final plan submittal, label the buildings on the overall site plan. i.e. Bldg. A to match building A on Sheet 8. [12/19/08] In addition to the site plan sheets submitted, an overall site plan should be provided at a smaller scale showing the entire site on one sheet. It makes it much easier to reference to ensure that nothing is missed. The site plan sheets submitted with this round are difficult to review since parts of buildings are continued on the next sheet. Also, it would be helpful to label the buildings in some manner (i.e. bldg 1, 2, 3, etc.). Number: 7 Created: 12/19/2008 [3/30/09] Still need a detail or description of the trash enclosure materials and height. [12/19/08] provide standard notes on cover sheet regarding such things as shielded, down - directional lighting, mechanical screening, trash enclosure material. Note on lighting must also state that under -canopy fueling areas shall feature flush -mounted, flat lens light fixtures. Number: 8 Created: 12/19/2008 [3/30/09] Very few wall -mounted fixtures are shown. Are you sure that's all there are? [12/19/08] Show wall -mounted light fixture locations on building elevations. The lighting plan indicates some wall fixtures on the King Soopers building, but only on the rear and north side. Does that mean that there won't be any on the front of the building? This request is tentatively scheduled for the May 21 st Planning & Zoning Board public hearing. Please make the necessary contacts with department staff to ensure it being able to remain on the agenda. I will need some sort of confirmation from them, preferably an e-mail saying they are OK. Be sure and return all red -lined plans if you re -submit before public hearing or when you submit for final Plan review. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, *tevel-t-W City Planner cc: Marc Virata Dana Leavitt Loveland Commercial AYRES Associates Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. Current Planning file #39-08 Page 7 3. Figure 8-15 of LCUASS specifies a difference mountable curb construction type for the inner median (and also calls out a colored truck apron). 4. Shouldn't all of the roundabout be specified as being constructed in concrete (at least to the back of the crosswalks that split the splitter islands)? 5. Please extend information on existing flowlines for Willox further east (and College further north) to ascertain how existing grades tie into proposed. Please indicate what existing grades appear to be. 6. The westbound bikelane on Willox just west of the roundabout appears to awkwardly taper in width heading east. This combined with the ramp from the sidewalk to the bikelane, appears to direct a bicyclist from the sidewalk onto a bikelane without sufficient width. Can the bikelane be widened to its full width and not taper, and/or should the bike ramp be moved further west to direct bicyclists onto the bikelane at its standard width? 7. The 10' to 13' width bikelanes west of the roundabout seem to potentially encourage parking in the bikelanes due to the large width. Assuming parking is not intended here, how will the design address potential concerns of parking in the bikelanes? If the striping is intended to tie into existing striping to the east, how will the change from bikelane no parking, to combined parking and bikelanes be managed? 8. The driveway design on the south side of Willox west of the roundabout seems to create the potential for folks heading eastbound on Willox off the driveway to have sight distance concerns to see the eastbound Willox movement from the right turn lane movement into the driveway. Would this driveway benefit from having the curb line on the east side of the driveway brought further north (similar perhaps to the first driveway on College north of the College/Willox intersection)? 9. Based upon the cross sections shown, it appears that additional right-of-way is needed from what was specified on the right-of-way map. 10. Referencing back to 4, shouldn't the use of a concrete pan across the south leg of the roundabout be eliminated? 11. Again referencing back to 4, please provide a concrete joint pattern plan and details for the roundabout. Number: 45 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The plat should be specifying an access easement internal to the site connecting to a public street and stubbing out to the north for where future development could connect to in order to assure access through the site. Number: 46 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] An access easement should also be specified for the bike/ped connection to the north. The design of this connection should be shown on all plans. Number: 47 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Technical Services provided the following comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Please add "Being a Replat Of' and Section, Township, Range information to the heading. 3. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on site and landscape plans. 4. Bearing and distances missing. See redlines. (The plat needs to "stand by itself' and show all bearings and distances.) Number: 48 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] I'd like to amend note #43 on the construction plan set, stating that the College and Willox improvements are designed by Interwest Consulting. Page 3 f t STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins David Kasprzak Date: 4/10/2009 BHA Design, Inc. 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE, SECOND FILING - TYPE 2, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 95 Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Created: 1 /5/2009 [4/7/09] Plan still shows spillage beyond property line in several locations. Add the correct property line to the plan, per comments on the redline. It is very difficult to read the fixture number with the foot-candle numbers superimposed on the fixture number. [1/5/09] Light spillage from north and east sides of the King Soopers building encroaches into Out Lot B, which is considered City owned property. Foot-candle levels shall be at 0.0 along the property boundaries adjacent to Out Lot B. Night light pollutions is not allowed to occur within the wetlands/natural areas adjacent to this development. -Property line has been corrected and text adjusted for clarity. Number: 96 Created: 1 /5/2009 [4/7/09] Luminaire schedule does not identify said fixtures as having a house side shield. [1/5/09] Pole mounted fixtures A27, A28, A29, A30, A52 and D21 are required to have houseside shields on fixtures as used on fixture F. This is required to reduce/eliminate potential impacts due to the fixture itself being visible from within the wetlands/natural areas. -Houseside shields have been added as requested. Topic: Site Plan Number: 53 Created: 12/31/2008 [4/7/09] Provide documents and graphic of driveway access location demonstrating no other alternative to extend Grape Street. [12/31/08] Consider eliminating the east end of Grape Street so that it is outside of the 100' buffer for the wetland. If impossible, change surface from gravel to a porous grass paver or similar material. Parking shall not be allowed within the 100' buffer zone along Grape Street. Add note on Site Plan to this effect. -Access has been revised to provide one entry point from the site (between building 2 and 3). Number: 90 Created: 1 /5/2009 [4/7/09] Per previous comment, demonstrate no other alternative for this location. The access to Grape Street could be moved to the west outside of the buffer. Page 1 [1/5/09] Show complete improvements to east end of Grape Street. Is access from the northeast corner of the development necessary onto Grape Street? -Access has been revised to provide one entry point from the site (between building 2 and 3) Number: 91 Created: 1 /5/2009 [4/7/09] Will need to address with Steve Olt. [1/5/09] Parking is required to be 5 feet from property lines. Out Lot B is a separate parcel to be conveyed to the City. All parking and circulation drives adjacent to Out Lot B must meet the setback requirement. This is also an issue for parking and circulation next to Grape Street, which is City -owned property. -Current location of lot line was placed to accommodate pedestrian trail connection on city property. Now that the trail connection has been eliminated the lot line location may need to be reviewed further. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Engineering Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] It should be verified that the road scope of work is coordinated. [12/30/08] Will the street trees along College and Willox be part of the road project or be installed with the development? Number: 45 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] Access and emergency access easement should also be shown on the plat for the drive aisle east of building D that connects to the Grape Street area so a loop is provided. [12/30/08] The plat should be specifying an access easement internal to the site connecting to a public street and stubbing out to the north for where future development could connect to in order to assure access through the site. -The drive aisle no longer connects to Grape Street. Access has been revised to provide one entry point from the site (between building 2 and 3) Number: 46 Created: 12/30/2008 [4/7/09] Carried over pending further outcome on the bridge situation. [12/30/08] An access easement should also be specified for the bike/ped connection to the north. The design of this connection should be shown on all plans. -The pedestrian bridge has been removed from this project. Number: 47 Created: 12/31/2008 [4/8/09] Technical Services has provided the following updated comments: 1. Boundary closes. -Noted 2. Scanning issues on site, landscape & utility plans. —Noted and revised where possible 3. All easements need to be locatable - add bearings & distances. -Noted 4. Filing #2 construction plans have benchmark 42-01 described incorrect. -Adjusted 5. College & Willox improvement plans shows benchmark 4201 incorrectly. -Adjusted [12/31/08] Technical Services provided the following comments: 1. Boundary closes. Page 2 2. Please add "Being a Replat Of" and Section, Township, Range information to the heading. 3. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on site and landscape plans. 4. Bearing and distances missing. See redlines. (The plat needs to "stand by itself' and show all bearings and distances.) Number: 80 Created: 1/2/2009 [4/7/09] It was indicated at staff review that access to North College Motors from within the property is not being provided at this time and they will continue their access onto Willox. Please revise the drawings to reflect this and as a result, show that no letter of intent for work on the North College Motors is needed. [1/2/09] Prior to a hearing for this PDP, we should receive written acknowledgement from the two owners of the two out parcels (restaurant and car dealership) on how this project will impact their existing businesses and will grant the developer access onto their property for the work pertaining to the internal drive aisle and access. -Access has been removed from the interior of the proposed site. Number: 84 Created: 1/2/2009 [4/7/09] The offset across drive aisles such that a vehicle may be more pre -disposed to hit a landscaped island is still there, especially at the main drive aisle off College. In addition, the revised parking lot design shows that almost all the east -west drive aisles now do not line up across the main north -south drive aisle (when they had previously). While again, this really isn't jurisdictionally under Engineering but under Planning and Zoning instead, I have quite a bit of concern on the parking lot layout for the folks who intend to use it. I'd like to see some feedback from the consultant's engineer and/or traffic engineer addressing whether the design is of a safety concern. "Note: The City internally had further discussion on the parking lot design on 4/9. The overall consensus is that the parking lot design was viewed as awkward and likely problematic for the end user. With that said, Engineering won't claim jurisdiction over the matter and won't look to review the parking lot design any further. [1/2/09] There are a couple of instances where the internal drive aisles shift across an intersection that seem awkward where drivers might hit landscape median. (As internal drive aisle design is not an Engineering concern, this is more of an observation rather than a comment.) -The drive aisle alignment has been adjusted throughout the site to improve traffic flow and alignment. Number: 87 Created: 1 /5/2009 [4/7/09] Carried over for further discussion. [1/5/09] We should have further dialogue regarding Grape Street and how the proposed development affects its legal status. As Grape Street is apparently not right-of-way but owned by the City, the City may take the position that with the proposed development and change to the access control plan, that there is no benefit in the City owning the property Page 3 either in fee or as right-of-way. The timing of the City potentially abandoning Grape Street would need to then be coordinated with the project's entitlement accordingly. -Three legal descriptions have been recorded along Grape Street (each a separate document) providing the necessary access and use easements. Number: 132 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] On the construction plan set, the utilities shown that are to be built with the l st filing should be faded back rather than appear prominent. On Sheet C-111 for example much of the sheet should be "reversed" in that the parking lots and drive aisles should be emphasized while the utilities should be shown in the same lineweight as the parking lots and drive aisles. On the utility sheets, everything built with the 1 st filing should be faded. -1st Filing utilities have been adjusted to indicate them as existing Number: 133 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The construction and site plan drawings should clearly discern what improvements are to be done specifically with the 2nd filing from the 1 st filing (such as a portion of sidewalk on Willox and a drive approach) and the road project. -Linework has been adjusted to differentiate between the two Filings Department: Light & Power Topic: General Number: 115 [3/30/09] No Comments. Department: PFA Topic: Fire Issue Contact: Justin Fields Created: 3/30/2009 Issue Contact: Carie Dann Number: 71 Created: 12/31/2008 [4/8/09] Per our discussion at Staff Review, an addition to the EAE should be made to the loop drive aisle around Building D, particularly if the FDC is on the east side of the building. -The drive aisle no longer connects to Grape Street. Access has been revised to provide one entry point from the site (between building 2 and 3) [12/31/081 REQUIRED ACCESS: PLEASE NOTE: The preliminary plate was great from a fire -protection standpoint. The EAEs shown on the plat were spot on. Thank you. I recommend that you contact me during the construction process so we can determine fire lane sign placement and red curb paint location in advance. Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFA's jurisdiction when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route (from a public street) around the exterior of the building or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: Page 4 ❑ Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites. 1 Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable. [ I Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. ❑ Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane (30 feet for buildings three or more stories in height). A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. If a fire lane is not provided, all buildings out of access (exceeding the 150-foot requirement) shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire -sprinkler system. 97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 Number: 77 Created: 12/31/2008 [4/8/09] Per our discussion at Staff Review, we need to meet and also include Roger Buffington, so we can determine hydrant locations that will optimize firefighting operations and also meet Water requirements. [12/31/08] WATER SUPPLY: PLEASE NOTE: Contact me if you want to discuss specific locations of and questions regarding fire hydrants. Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include: • Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter • Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter • Residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter. These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 97UFC 901.2.2.2 -This item was resolved with the 1st Filing improvements. Number: 134 Created: 4/8/2009 BOLLARDS: Please see 2006 IFC Section 312 Vehicle Impact Protection for requirements for bollards around hydrants and other fire devices. -Noted Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Matt Wempe Topic: General Number: 116 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] Please specify the type of bicycle racks proposed. Page 5 Number: 124 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] At the southeast corner of the intersection of College and Willox, please see the construction plans for redlines regarding hatching along the bicycle lane east of College. I have also forwarded this comment to Matt Baker in Engineering. Topic: Site Plan Number: 117 Created: 4/7/2009 N [ umbe] No sidewalks are shown around Pad 1, though bicycle parking and ADA ramps are located nearby. Please show any sidewalks proposed on both Sheet 2 and the other detailed site plan, civil plan, and landscaping plan sheets. -Sidewalks, ramps, and other site items have been coordinated. Number: 118 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] Please use a consistent shading or cross -hatch for the sidewalks. This comment was partially addressed in the last round of review. -Noted Number: 119 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] Please see the site plan for redlines on bicycle parking locations. Bicycle parking cannot impede pedestrian flow or block ADA ramps. Number: 120 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The bicycle parking around Building A is not located near a main entrance. Please relocate or add additional bicycle parking around this building. Number: 121 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] No bicycle parking is shown for Pad 3. Please relocate or add additional bicycle parking around this pad. Number: 122 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] Please relocate or add additional bicycle parking near the main entrance of King Soopers. There are currently eight spaces on the north entrance and only four near the main south entrance. Number: 123 Created: 4/7/2009 [4/7/09] The key map on the pedestrian bridge detail sheet in the civil plans does not match the current site plan. -The pedestrian bridge has been removed from this project. Number: 125 Created: 4/7/2009 Page 6 [4/7/09] The construction plans for the Willox roundabout show a median extending onto the King Soopers property. A pedestrian crossing is located within the public right-of-way. The site plan shows the same median, but with another pedestrian crossing on the north end of the median. My suggestion is to use the south pedestrian crossing that is part of the roundabout (in the public right-of-way) and not extend the internal sidewalk on the west side of the access drive past this crossing. -After review with other departments it was decided the northern pedestrian crossing should remain as it will be travelled by pedestrians heading towards building 7. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Created: 1 /2/2009 Number: 82 [4/10/091 Comment 81 resolved. PDP can go to a hearing. [1/2/09] There is no more major comments that need to be addressed before the hearing besides comment 81. During final compliance review, a detailed review will take place of the site grading, erosion control measures, and all hydraulics. I did review the hydraulics that was submitted, and found no comments. -Noted Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 12/ 19/2008 [3/30/09] The sign detail for the King Soopers fuel price sign is still shown on Sheet 2 of the architectural elevation drawings. Remove from drawings with final plan compliance. -The signs have been removed from the proposed monument sign framework. [ 12/ 19/081 Remove sign details from drawings. Signs must comply with the sign code. Since the property is not in the residential neighborhood sign district, signs are reviewed only at time of sign permit application. Showing signs now will give the wrong impression that the signs will be ok, but that's not known yet. i.e. the monument sign shown might comply, but until we know exact location we don't know for sure. So remove all signs. -All signs have been removed from the elevations. Number: 2 Created: 12/ 19/2008 [3/30/09] At final plan submittal, label the buildings on the overall site plan. i.e. Bldg. A to match building A on Sheet 8. -The buildings have been noted as requested on the overall site plan. [12/19/081 In addition to the site plan sheets submitted, an overall site plan should be provided at a smaller scale showing the entire site on one sheet. It makes it much easier to reference to ensure that nothing is missed. The site plan sheets submitted with this round are difficult to review since parts of buildings are continued on the next sheet. Also, it would be helpful to label the buildings in some manner (i.e. bldg 1, 2, 3, etc.). Number: 7 Created: 12/ 19/2008 Page 7 [3/30/09] Still need a detail or description of the trash enclosure materials and height. -A detail of the trash enclosure height and materials has been provided. [12/19/08] provide standard notes on cover sheet regarding such things as shielded, down - directional lighting, mechanical screening, trash enclosure material. Note on lighting must also state that under -canopy fueling areas shall feature flush -mounted, flat lens light fixtures. -The under -canopy fueling areas do not utilize flat lens fixtures, we have proposed an Encore "focus" style light fixture that minimizes light spillage more than flat lens fixtures by directing the light only on the fuel pumps. Technically this type of fixture extends about 5" below the canopy but achieves more control of light spillage than the flat lens fixtures. Number: 8 Created: 12/ 19/2008 [3/30/091 Very few wall -mounted fixtures are shown. Are you sure that's all there are? -The photometric plan currently reflects all desired light fixtures. However, we have recently received updated information from King Soopers and a proposed bank tenant. We will review our building lighting design to ensure the lighting design for the entire development is consistent. [12/19/08] Show wall -mounted light fixture locations on building elevations. The lighting plan indicates some wall fixtures on the King Soopers building, but only on the rear and north side. Does that mean that there won't be any on the front of the building? -Additional lighting has been added to the front of the building. This request is tentatively scheduled for the May 21s` Planning & Zoning Board public hearing. Please make the necessary contacts with department staff to ensure it being able to remain on the agenda. I will need some sort of confirmation from them, preferably an e-mail saying they are OK. Be sure and return all red -lined plans if you re -submit before public hearing or when you submit for final Plan review. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner cc: Marc Virata Dana Leavitt Loveland Commercial AYRES Associates Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. Current Planning file #39-08 Page 8 6� STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Citv of Fort Collins BHA Design, Inc. Date: 11 /2/2009 c/o David Kasprzak 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE, SECOND FILING, FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 154 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/09] Both the Site Plan and Landscape Plan sets include Approximate Limits of Construction, but neither set clearly shows the actual North College Marketplace property boundaries. Both sets of plans must include the property boundaries and label them as such, as set forth in: * Submittal Requirements: Final Plan Review; - 5) Final site plan, showing the following information: - 5)b) Lot lines, easements, public rights -of -way as per subdivision plat. Because the boundary line was not clearly shown and labeled along the south side of Grape Street it was not fully understood what private development improvements were being proposed outside of the North College Marketplace development boundary and in Grape Street (City -owned property). The developer must work with the property owners (Breckenridge, Mayes, Adamich) on the north side of Grape Street and City Real Estate Services to coordinate assurance of continued access to their properties without being encumbered by the shopping center improvements on the City -owned property that includes Grape Street, if allowed. GRAPE STREET NOTE ADDED ON SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 155 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/091 Adjust LOD on all plan drawings - Site, Landscape and Utilities, per the red -line Landscape Plan. -ADJUSTED ADJUSTED AND COORDINATED Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 153 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/09] Sheet 16 of the Landscape Plan must include the standard required Plant Notes, Tree Protection Specification Notes, and Water Use Table (see Examples, included). Also, Page 1 Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, has forwarded some notes that must be included on Sheet 16. NOTES ADDED. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 95 Created: 1 /5/2009 [10/23/09] Plan still contains spillage into buffer areas. The light pole locations or fixture heads have been adjusted to minimize light spillage into the buffer areas. [4/7/09] Plan still shows spillage beyond property line in several locations. Add the correct property line to the plan, per comments on the red -line. It is very difficult to read the fixture number with the foot-candle numbers superimposed on the fixture number. The light pole locations or fixture heads have been adjusted to minimize light spillage over the property line. The fixture numbers have been updated to increase text legibility. [1/5/09] Light spillage from north and east sides of the King Soopers building encroaches into Out Lot B, which is considered City owned property. Foot-candle levels shall be at 0.0 along the property boundaries adjacent to Out Lot B. Night light pollutions is not allowed to occur within the wetlands/natural areas adjacent to this development. The light pole locations or fixture heads have been adjusted to minimize light spillage. Number: 96 Created: 1 /5/2009 [10/23/09] Do not see any table that denotes inclusion of house side shield on fixtures. The notes describing the houseside shield have been added. [4/7/09] Luminaire schedule does not identify said fixtures as having a house side shield. [1/5/09] Pole mounted fixtures A27, A28, A29, A30, A52 and D21 are required to have houseside shields on fixtures as used on fixture F. This is required to reduce/eliminate potential impacts due to the fixture itself being visible from within the wetlands/natural areas. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve OR Topic: Site Plan Number: 149 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/09] The buildings on the Overall Site Plan must be labeled (i.e.: Bldg. 2, Bldg. 3, etc.) to match the designations on the other Site Plan sheets. LABELED Number: 150 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/091 The square footage of each building must be included within the building on each sheet showing building(s). SF ADDED TO EACH BUILDING Number: 151 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/09] On the Cover Sheet of the Site Plan, under LAND USE TABLE, it shows a Maximum Building Height of 2 stories. The Building Coverage is shown to be 167,582 square feet. If there are to be some 2-story buildings with habitable space on the second floor then the Total Square Footage in the shopping center could be more than the Building Coverage. The Site Plan must address this. Page 2 Number: 55 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Patching limits for the onsite portion of the project that takes place onto Willox should be further discussed and possibly coordinated with the road plans. Street cuts on Willox potentially are subject to triple impact fees for the street cuts as the roadway is currently within the 5 year time frame for the penalty. Given the amount of street cut shown, regardless of whether the impact fee is tripled, it may be worth pursuing an overlay of Willox (and potential coordination of this with the road project). The overlay would negate the assessment of a street cut fee. Erika Keeton should be contacted for further discussion regarding this. Number: 79 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] With the development and its corresponding roadway improvements changing the access for the two properties southwest of the site, an access easement should be shown on the plat (similar to ID#45) linking the two drive aisles for each property out to Willox. Number: 80 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] Prior to a hearing for this PDP, we should receive written acknowledgement from the two owners of the two out parcels (restaurant and car dealership) on how this project will impact their existing businesses and will grant the developer access onto their property for the work pertaining to the internal drive aisle and access. Number: 84 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] There are a couple of instances where the internal drive aisles shift across an intersection that seem awkward where drivers might hit landscape median. (As internal drive aisle design is not an Engineering concern, this is more of an observation rather than a comment.) Number: 85 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] The legal description shown on the site plan should just be the corresponding title of the plat instead of the metes and bounds description since the PDP is being platted. Number: 86 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] The plat, landscape, site, and construction plan set should have the title of the documents all coordinated in the same manner. The plat is titled "North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing" which works well in being consistent with the title of the previous plat for the wetlands. North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing should be the title on all the documents (and if desired, additional info can be added to the end of the title such as "North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing, King Soopers". ) Number: 87 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] We should have further dialogue regarding Grape Street and how the proposed development affects its legal status. As Grape Street is apparently not right-of-way but owned by the City, the City may take the position that with the proposed development and change to the access control plan, that there is no benefit in the City owning the property either in fee or as right-of-way. The timing of the City potentially abandoning Grape Street would need to then be coordinated with the project's entitlement accordingly. Page 4 NOTE ADDED WITH A DOUBLE ASTERIK INDICATING THE SIZE OF THE MEZZANINE LEVEL IN KING SOOPERS. NO OTHER 2ND FLOORS ARE PLANNED. ALSO THE `BUILDING COVERAGE' WAS ADJUSTED TO MATCH SITE PLAN AND DOES NOT INCLUDE MEZZANINE AREA. THIS AREA IS PROVIDED SEPARATELY IN THE NOTE EXPLAINED ABOVE. Number: 152 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/09] On the Overall Site Plan, the trail shown going north of the shopping center and across the Larimer and Weld Canal is no longer going to occur. Please remove that section of the trail from the Site Plan. TRAIL REMOVED FROM PLANS. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Engineering Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2008 [10/9/09] Carrying this comment over after showing the 2nd Filing construction drawings to Kyle Lambrecht in Engineering Capital Projects. It appears that they have been operating under the assumption that the drive approaches out to the public streets would be built with the road project though the construction drawings seem to show this will be done by the project. It seems that the plans should be revised to reflect the drive approaches being built with the project. [4/7/09] It should be verified that the road scope of work is coordinated. [12/30/08] Will the street trees along College and Willox be part of the road projector be installed with the development? —THE DRIVE APPROACHES WILL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THIS PROJECT AND THE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO REFLECT THIS. TEMPORARY ASPHALT PATCH WILL OCCUR FROM THE SITE IMPROVMENTS TO EXISTING COLLEGE AVENUE OR WILLOX LANE. Number: 47 Created: 12/31 /2008 [ 10/21 /09] Some of these comments have not been addressed. Utility plans were not provided for review. [4/8/09] Technical Services has provided the following updated comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Scanning issues on Site, Landscape & Utility Plans. 3. All easements need to be locatable - add bearings & distances. 4. Filing #2 construction plans have benchmark 42-01 described incorrect. 5. College & Willox improvement plans shows benchmark 4201 incorrectly. [12/31/08] Technical Services provided the following comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Please add "Being a Replat Of' and Section, Township, Range information to the heading. 3. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on Site and Landscape Plans. 4. Bearing and distances missing. See red -lines. (The plat needs to "stand by itself' and show all bearings and distances.) Page 3 Number: 87 Created: 1 /5/2009 [10/9/09] The Grape Street area really needs to have dialogue between the City and the Developer. The drawings had not been clear in indicating and distinguishing the City's ownership of Grape Street from the development proposal. Property lines and labeling of areas outside of the developer's owned property needs to be clearly shown on all sheets. The parking area has been adjusted to accommodate the trash enclosure on private property. The placement of retaining walls, landscaping, a fast food drive aisle, and trash dumpsters are all apparently within the City's Grape Street but I'm not aware of what sort of discussions have taken place between the Developer and the City with the City either agreeing to this, or perhaps should the City be divesting interest in ownership in all or a portion of Grape Street with the City retaining appropriate easements? The response letter indicates three legal descriptions "have been recorded along Grape Street". I assume this means these legal descriptions have been prepared and are proposed. If these easements are desired (and need to be recorded prior to the plat) the Developer should really be in discussions with the City in order to move this process. [4/7/09] Carried over for further discussion. [1/5/09] We should have further dialogue regarding Grape Street and how the proposed development affects its legal status. As Grape Street is apparently not right-of-way but owned by the City, the City may take the position that with the proposed development and change to the access control plan, that there is no benefit in the City owning the property either in fee or as right-of-way. The timing of the City potentially abandoning Grape Street would need to then be coordinated with the project's entitlement accordingly. — DISCUSSIONS ARE UNDERWAY BETWEEN CITY REAL ESTATE AND THE DEVELOPER CONCERNING GRAPE STREET AND ITS INTENDED USE. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONTINUE TO BE SHOWN WHILE THE OWNERSHIP BOUNDS ARE NEGOTIATED. A NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED STATING THAT NO WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHIN THIS PORTION OF GRAPE STREET UNTIL AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED. IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT ONE OF THE RETAINING WALLS, TRASH ENCLOSUE, AND A PORTION OF THE CURB AND GUTTER. HAVE BEEN MOVED OUTSIDE OF THE GRAPE STREET LIMITS, LEAVING ONLY THE AREA NORTH OF THE FAST FOOD LOT. Number: 133 Created: 4/7/2009 [10/9/09] There still appears to be a little discrepancy with regards to the sidewalk. The horizontal control plan appears to have this shown as being constructed with this filing, while the overall plan seems to show this as existing (being built with the 1 st filing). [4/7/09] The construction and site plan drawings should clearly discern what improvements are to be done specifically with the 2nd filing from the 1 st filing (such as a portion of sidewalk on Willox and a drive approach) and the road project. -THE WALKWAYS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THIS PROJECT HAVE BEEN HATCHED ON THE PLANS. THE ONLY STRETCHES OF SIDEWASLK TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE EAST OF THE ROUND ABOUT TO THE ENTRANCE DRIVE. THE WALKWAY FROM THE ENTRACNCE DRIVE TO BLUE SPRUCE IS PART OF THE FIRST FILING IMPROVMENTS. Page 4 Number: 136 Created: 10/5/2009 [10/5/09] The two driveways out to Willox Lane running parallel to College Avenue that are not tied to the roundabout directs impervious area over a public sidewalk in excess of LCUASS criteria. The use of a sidewalk chase should be implement or perhaps the creation of a curb break on the east inflow curb and gutter section to outlet into the adjoining green space? -CURB CUTS HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AT BOTH LOCATIONS. FLOW WILL BE DIRECTED THROGH THE CUTS INTO LANSCAPED AREAS BEHIND THE CURBS. Number: 137 Created: 10/6/2009 [ 10/6/09] The Grape Street area shows the placement of trash enclosures partially within the Grape Street property along with a fast food drive aisle, retaining walls and landscaping. These along with the proposed easements need approval through the City. Note that even if the City allows the encroachment of the trash enclosure and retaining wall, there may be additional concerns with the trash enclosure and retaining wall being located over proposed easements, especially if a building permit for these are needed. -THE TRACH ENCLOSURE AND ONE OF THE RETAINING WALLS HAVE BEEN MOVED TO OUTSIDE OF THE GRAPE STREET LIMITS WHILE THE AREA NORTH OF THE FAST FOOD RESTAURANT REMAINS IN THE PLANS. DISCUSSIONS ARE UNDERWAY TO RESOLVE ACCESS AND OWNERSHIP CONCERNS. The parking area has been adjusted to accommodate the trash enclosure on private property. Number: 138 Created: 10/9/2009 [ 10/9/09] The construction drawings need to clearly show property lines on all sheets. The aforementioned comment on the trash enclosure, retaining wall, drive aisle and landscaping being within Grape Street cannot be discerned on the construction plan set due to the lack of the information on property lines specific to the 2nd Filing (and the indication of the Grape Street boundary as well as 1st Filing boundary). -THICK DARK LINES .HAVE BEEN ADDED TO ALL SHEETS SHOWING THE EXISTING ROW AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY ALONG WITH THE PROPOPESD LOT LINES. Number: 139 Created: 10/13/2009 [10/13/09] I'm understanding that the developer maybe interested in not constructing the standard 6" thick concrete for sidewalk in public right-of-way and instead using 5.5" thick concrete with fiber mesh. I'm understanding there appears to be support on the Capital Projects side. Should this be pursued specific to this project, a variance request should be initiated by the developer's consultant engineer. Alternatively, if the capital project has the City Engineer granting this variance on the road project and expresses it may also apply to the development project, that would be acceptable. -THE STANDARD 6" THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK WILL BE USED WITHIN THE ROW. 5.5" REINFORCED FIBER MESH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CERTAIN AREEAS WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. Topic: General Number: 156 Created: 10/23/2009 Page 5 [10/23/09] City staff met this afternoon to discuss Grape Street. Representatives were present from Real Estate, the Attorney's Office, Advance Planning and Planning (now known as Community Development and Neighborhood Services). The following conclusions were made based upon the development proposal shown for Grape Street: The site plan as presently shown utilizes Grape Street in a manner that is problematic for several reasons: * The fast food aisle is a private use on public property. * The construction of curb, retaining wall and landscaping along Grape Street (just east of the north -south drive aisle that connects to the properties to the north) is an encroachment and constricts the width of the drive aisle along Grape Street to less than 20' which is the required minimum width to provide legal access to the parcels on the north side of Grape Street. * The placement of trash enclosures are a private use on public property. The Developer's desire to utilize Grape Street in the manner described above requires that the Developer begin discussions with Real Estate Services (Helen Matson 221- 6276) in order to utilize Grape Street, with the Developer purchasing City property needing to take place. This will ultimately require an action by City Council. In addition the concern of having legal 20' access to the properties on the north side of Grape Street will need to be addressed (by either keeping 20' clear through altering the design or perhaps obtaining additional easement on the north side of Grape Street to make a total 20' width). Given the potential timing aspects of discussion with City Real Estate and City Council, if there are time concerns, the Developer may wish to pursue an alternative site plan that does not utilize Grape Street at this time. The site plan (and development agreement if appropriate) can then be amended to reflect the utilization of Grape Street upon the completion of discussions with City Real Estate and the appropriate action by City Council. -DISCUSSIONS ARE UNDERWAY BETWEEN CITY REAL ESTATE AND THE DEVELOPER CONCERNING GRAPE STREET AND ITS INTENDED USE. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONTINUE TO BE SHOWN WHILE THE OWNERSHIP BOUNDS ARE NEGOTIATED. A NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED STATING THAT NO WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHIN THIS PORTION OF GRAPE STREET UNTIL AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED. IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT ONE OF THE RETAINING WALLS, TRASH ENCLOSUE, AND A PORTION OF THE CURB AND GUTTER HAVE BEEN MOVED OUTSIDE OF THE GRAPE STREET LIMITS, LEAVING ONLY THE AREA NORTH OF THE FAST FOOD LOT. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 148 Created: 10/21 /2009 EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT: I don't see a reason for including an EAE on the new, separate document (by outlots D and E),I think you can remove the EAE.-REMOVED Page 6 Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County Topic: Elevation Plan Number: 146 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] The elevation plans have line over text issues. See red -lines. The elevations text legibility issues have been resolved. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 145 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] The Landscape Plans have line over text & text over text issues. See red -lines. ADJUSTED. Topic: Plat Number: 141 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] The boundary & legal close. -NOTED Number: 142 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] The reception numbers in the legal & on the plat, need to be added prior to filing. -NOTED Number: 143 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] Please add the missing easement dimension(see redlines) on the plat. -ADDED Number: 147 Created: 10/21 /2009 [ 10/21/09] Please add bearings & distances on all easements, new & existing. The plat needs to "stand alone". -ADDED Topic: Site Plan Number: 144 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] The Site Plans have line over text issues. See red -lines. ADJUSTED. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 140 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] Please check the separation distances between water/sewer lines (including fire hydrants and meter pits) and trees and shrubs. SEPARATIONS CHECKED. SOME TREES HAVE BEEN REMOVED IN PARKING ISLANDS. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 2 Created: 12/19/2008 [10/1/09] Applicant's response letter states that the buildings have been labeled, but I don't see any such labeling on the Overall Site Plan. LABELS PROVIDED ON OVERAL SITE PLAN. [3/30/09] At final plan submittal, label the buildings on the Overall Site Plan. i.e. Bldg. A to match building A on Sheet 8. -ADDED Page 7 [12/19/08] In addition to the Site Plan sheets submitted, an Overall Site Plan should be provided at a smaller scale showing the entire site on one sheet. It makes it much easier to reference to ensure that nothing is missed. The Site Plan sheets submitted with this round are difficult to review since parts of buildings are continued on the next sheet. Also, it would be helpful to label the buildings in some manner (i.e. bldg 1, 2, 3, etc.). Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner cc: Marc Virata Planning file #43-09A Page 8 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Port Collins BHA Design, Inc. Date: 1/12/2009 c/o David Kasprzak 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE, PHASE 2, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN - TYPE 2, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 105 Created: 1 / 12/2009 [1/12/09] Additional comments will be coming from Current Planning no later than January 16, 2009. Department: Current Planning Topic: General Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Number: 49 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Add wetland buffer- consistently, to all plan drawings. Number: 89 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add Limit of Development (LOD) Line to all plan drawings: Site, Landscape and all Utility plan drawings Number: 94 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] All wetlands to be labeled "Wetlands per Wetlands PDP." Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 95 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Light spillage from north and east sides of the King Soopers building encroaches into Out Lot B, which is considered City owned property. Foot-candle levels shall be at 0.0 along the property boundaries adjacent to Out Lot B. Night light pollutions are not allowed to occur within the wetlands/natural areas adjacent to this development. Number: 96 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Pole mounted fixtures A27, A28, A29, A30, A52 and D21 are required to have house side shields on fixtures as used on fixture F. This is required to reduce/eliminate potential impacts due to the fixture itself being visible from within the wetlands/natural areas. Topic: Plat Number: 51 [12/31/08] Add note to Plat, Site plan and utilities: Code for allowable uses within a buffer zone. Created: 12/31 /2008 Refer to Section 3.4.(E) of the Land Use Page 1 Number: 88 Created: 1/5/2009 [1/5/09] Add following note to the plat: Pursuant to Section 12-122 of the Municipal Code, no person or property owner association shall create, cause to be created, enforce or seek to enforce any provision contained in any restrictive covenant which has the effect of prohibiting or limiting the installation or use of Xeriscape landscaping, solar/ photo -voltaic collectors (if mounted flush upon any established roof line), clothes lines (if located in back yards), or odor -controlled compost bins, or which has the effect of requiring that a portion of any individual lot be planted in turf grass. Number: 97 Created: 1/5/2009 [1/5/09] Add buffer zone text to plat per redline comments. Topic: Site Plan Number: 52 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The pedestrian trail ends at the edge of the parking lot with no connectivity to any of the facilities within the shopping center. Consider realigning the walk so it directs people to the dominant structure in the center. The trail may continue within the buffer as needed with the same requirements as the Wetlands PDP. Number: 53 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Consider eliminating the east end of Grape Street so that it is outside of the 100' buffer for the wetland. If impossible, change surface from gravel to a porous grass paver or similar material. Parking shall not be allowed within the 100' buffer zone along Grape Street. Add note on Site Plan to this effect. Number: 90 Created: 1/5/2009 [1/5/09] Show complete improvements to east end of Grape Street. Is access from the northeast corner of the development necessary onto Grape Street? Number: 91 Created: 1/5/2009 [1/5/09] Parking is required to be 5 feet from property lines. Out Lot B is a separate parcel to be conveyed to the City. All parking and circulation drives adjacent to Out Lot B must meet the setback requirement. This is also an issue for parking and circulation next to Grape Street, which is City owned property. Number: 92 Created: 1/5/2009 [1/5/09] The existing conditions shall reflect the approved plans of the Wetlands PDP. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 99 Created: 1/5/2009 [1/5/09] Add tree protection notes to Sheet C-002. Refer to the demolition and landscape plans for the tree protection details. Change note #5 of the Standard Grading and Erosion and Sediment control construction plan Notes so that there is no conflict with the tree protection notes. The tree protection notes supersede this note. Page 2 Number: 101 Created: 1/5/2009 [ 1/5/09] Add note to C-002, "Refer to Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within a buffer zone." Number: 102 Created: l /5/2009 [1/5/09] On all plan drawings in set, the existing conditions shall reflect the approved plans for the Wetlands PDP, i.e.: final wetlands boundaries, grading, trees removed, wetland buffers, etc. Number: 103 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] On Erosion Control Plan, sheet C-142, add silt fence per redline comment. Number: 104 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] Add Silt Fence to Erosion Control Plan at top of retaining wall on west edge of the wetland adjacent to the King Soopers building. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Engineering Number: 10 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] The TDR Fee did paid did not account for the .25 per square foot cost of building square footage. This amount totals an additional $41,895.50, but in applying the reduction factor in the fee schedule, the total TDR fee is calculated as $39,057.88, which with the previous payment of $6,220.25 leaves the existing balance due as $32,837.63. Number: 11 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] On the construction plan set, please provide the consultant's signature block in accordance with LCUASS criteria. Number: 12 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] A 2nd project benchmark should be added and referenced in the construction plan set. Number: 13 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] On C-111 amend the reference to the roadway plans from "by others" to "Interwest Consulting Group" as redlined in order to reflect that the roadway plans are tied to the project. Number: 14 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] On all sheets, please have the right-of-way/property line clearly shown and featured. Also, please have the proposed utility easement behind the right-of-way similarly shown and featured. Page 3 Number: 15 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] Driveway approaches are required to be constructed in concrete within right-of- way up to the property line. Please ensure that concrete is shown up to the back of walk. (provide LCUASS detail 707). Number: 16 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] There is a section of sidewalk along College Avenue that falls outside of the right-of-way for College. As shown on the redlined plat, please either expand the right-of- way to include this area or have this area also dedicated as an access easement. Number: 38 Created: 12/26/2008 [12/26/08] Starting on C-201 of the construction plans, please use a darker line weight for some of the text in the profile view as it won't likely scan/reproduce well. Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] Will the street trees along College and Willox be part of the road project or be installed with the development? Number: 40 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The diagonal parking along the driveway that intersects with College is required to be setback from the flowline of College a distance of 100' per LCUASS detail 19-6. It appears that the first parking stall closest to College would need to be removed in conformance with this criteria. Number: 41 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] Sheet 8 of the site plan identifies the use of a raised crosswalk at the intersection of a drive aisle and College Avenue. Was this intended? The use of a raised crosswalk at the intersection of a public street seems awkward and I'm not aware of its use in the City. Number: 42 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] In conjunction with the previous comment, decorative (colored) concrete should not be used in public right-of-way. Number: 43 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] On both the site plan and the construction plan set, please label sidewalk widths both onsite and along public right-of-way. Also, please label raised crosswalks on the construction plan set. Construction details should be provided on how the raised crosswalks are to be built. Number: 44 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The following comments pertain to the College/Willox plans. As these are separate from the development and also managed by City Engineering - Capital Projects, these comments should be viewed as input rather than requirements -- I will defer to the Capital Projects folks: Page 4 F6rt Collins Cu=% rrent Planning PO Box 580 ' Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 * 970.224,6134 - fax DATE: December. 15, 2008 TO: Technical Services PROJECT COMMENT SHEET PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt M V # 43-08 NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE PHASE 2 PDP —TYPE 11 Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: Qy e cows December 31, 2008 Z. PGH4545 'goo �.✓G V R&PcAT OF 4AIP S�GTi� l 3. /y1i�J0i2 L/QED✓ 7"�1C rISM4,64✓i 6JI55Ue_5 4U) 5176- �1114A/pSeA&e Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference �. $�92a+�t1sS�Di5Ti9+UGES M15S�A16. gceE DLi�S . —' f t L� �c 4r lei t us No Problems " Sr^.� S14Q": ui 1 T", La's Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) 1el1D Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other_ JUtility _Redline Utility K Landscape 1. I'm understanding that the use of hardscape splashblock along Willox and College may be viewed as a walkable surface from an ADA standpoint. If such is the case, the entire surface including the access ramps off the standard sidewalk would need to meet ADA requirements (such that for example, flared access ramps could not be used.) 2. It appears that an offsite easement will be needed from the Albertson's shopping center for the construction of the southern driveway approach leg of the roundabout. 3. Figure 8-15 of LCUASS specifies a difference mountable curb construction type for the inner median (and also calls out a colored truck apron). 4. Shouldn't all of the roundabout be specified as being constructed in concrete (at least to the back of the crosswalks that split the splitter islands)? 5. Please extend information on existing flowlines for Willox further east (and College further north) to ascertain how existing grades tie into proposed. Please indicate what existing grades appear to be. 6. The westbound bike lane on Willox just west of the roundabout appears to awkwardly taper in width heading east. This combined with the ramp from the sidewalk to the bike lane, appears to direct a bicyclist from the sidewalk onto a bike lane without sufficient width. Can the bike lane be widened to its full width and not taper, and/or should the bike ramp be moved further west to direct bicyclists onto the bike lane at its standard width? 7. The 10' to 13' width bike lanes west of the roundabout seem to potentially encourage parking in the bike lanes due to the large width. Assuming parking is not intended here, how will the design address potential concerns of parking in the bike lanes? If the striping is intended to tie into existing striping to the east, how will the change from bike lane no parking, to combined parking and bike lanes be managed? 8. The driveway design on the south side of Willox west of the roundabout seems to create the potential for folks heading eastbound on Willox off the driveway to have sight distance concerns to see the eastbound Willox movement from the right turn lane movement into the driveway. Would this driveway benefit from having the curb line on the east side of the driveway brought further north (similar perhaps to the first driveway on College north of the College/Willox intersection)? 9. Based upon the cross sections shown, it appears that additional right-of-way is needed from what was specified on the right-of-way map. 10. Referencing back to 4, shouldn't the use of a concrete pan across the south leg of the roundabout be eliminated? 11. Again referencing back to 4, please provide a concrete joint pattern plan and details for the roundabout. Number: 45 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] The plat should be specifying an access easement internal to the site connecting to a public street and stubbing out to the north for where future development could connect to in order to assure access through the site. Number: 46 Created: 12/30/2008 [12/30/08] An access easement should also be specified for the bike/ped connection to the north. The design of this connection should be shown on all plans. Page 5 Number: 47 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Technical Services provided the following comments: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Please add "Being a Replat Of' and Section, Township, Range information to the heading. 3. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on site and landscape plans. 4. Bearing and distances missing. See redlines. (The plat needs to "stand by itself' and show all bearings and distances.) Number: 48 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] I'd like to amend note #43 on the construction plan set, stating that the College and Willox improvements are designed by Interwest Consulting. Number: 55 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Patching limits for the onsite portion of the project that takes place onto Willox should be further discussed and possibly coordinated with the road plans. Street cuts on Willox potentially are subject to triple impact fees for the street cuts as the roadway is currently within the 5 year time frame for the penalty. Given the amount of street cut shown, regardless of whether the impact fee is tripled, it may be worth pursuing an overlay of Willox (and potential coordination of this with the road project). The overlay would negate the assessment of a street cut fee. Erika Keeton should be contacted for further discussion regarding this. Number: 79 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] With the development and its corresponding roadway improvements changing the access for the two properties southwest of the site, an access easement should be shown on the plat (similar to ID#45) linking the two drive aisles for each property out to Willox. Number: 80 Created: l /2/2009 [1/2/09] Prior to a hearing for this PDP, we should receive written acknowledgement from the two owners of the two out parcels (restaurant and car dealership) on how this project will impact their existing businesses and will grant the developer access onto their property for the work pertaining to the internal drive aisle and access. Number: 84 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] There are a couple of instances where the internal drive aisles shift across an intersection that seems awkward where drivers might hit landscape median. (As internal drive aisle design is not an Engineering concern, this is more of an observation rather than a comment.) Number: 85 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] The legal description shown on the site plan should just be the corresponding title of the plat instead of the metes and bounds description since the PDP is being platted. Page 6 Number: 86 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] The plat, landscape, site, and construction plan set should have the title of the documents all coordinated in the same manner. The plat is titled "North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing" which works well in being consistent with the title of the previous plat for the wetlands. North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing should be the title on all the documents (and if desired, additional info can be added to the end of the title such as "North College Marketplace Subdivision Second Filing, King Soopers".) Number: 87 Created: 1 /5/2009 [1/5/09] We should have further dialogue regarding Grape Street and how the proposed development affects its legal status. As Grape Street is apparently not right-of-way but owned by the City, the City may take the position that with the proposed development and change to the access control plan, that there is no benefit in the City owning the property either in fee or as right-of-way. The timing of the City potentially abandoning Grape Street would need to then be coordinated with the project's entitlement accordingly. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 65 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] Most of these comments I also made during the Preliminary Design Review and the ODP processes. I'll repeat them now, and also add two new comments, for the purpose of documentation. Number: 66 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable). PLEASE NOTE: The structures that are located closest to College Avenue may be required to have address numerals mounted on the street side of the building (College Avenue side and also another side of the building, if the main entrance is not on the College Avenue side of the building. 97UFC901.4.4 Number: 67 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] RADIO AMPLIFICATION: New buildings greater than 50,000 SF shall be equipped with an approved public -safety radio communication amplification system. The system shall be designed and installed in accordance with criteria established by the Fire Code official based on the capabilities and communication features of emergency services. PFA Fire Prevention Bureau Administrative Policy 07-01 Number: 68 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] TURNING RADII: Minimum turning radii for emergency -response apparatus on any fire apparatus roadway is 25 feet inside, 50 feet outside. UFC 902.2.2.3 Page 7 Number: 69 a Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] HMIA: Thank you for submitting the Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis. Please be sure an additional copy is submitted to the Fort Collins Building Services Department, if it has not been already. Number: 70 [12/31/08] FUEL CANOPY CLEARANCE for the fueling station is 14 feet above grade. Created: 12/31 /2008 Minimum clearance for the canopy/canopies Number: 71 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] REQUIRED ACCESS: PLEASE NOTE: The preliminary plate was great from a fire -protection standpoint. The EAEs shown on the plat were spot on. Thank you. I recommend that you contact me during the construction process so we can determine fire lane sign placement and red curb paint location in advance. Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFA's jurisdiction when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route (from a public street) around the exterior of the building or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: ❑ Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites. ❑ Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable. ❑ Be designated on the. plat as an Emergency Access Easement. ❑ Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane (30 feet for buildings three or more stories in height). ❑ A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. If a fire lane is not provided, all buildings out of access (exceeding the 150-foot requirement) shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire -sprinkler system. 97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 Number: 72 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: The King Soopers structure is required to be equipped with an approved, automatic fire -sprinkler system. Number: 73 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: Proposed buildings exceeding 5,000 square feet for type V construction shall be fire contained or fire sprinklered. 97UBC Table9-B (City of Fort Collins Amendment) Page 8 Number: 74 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. Number: 75 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: Fire department connections shall be installed remote from the buildings, and located on the street or fire lane side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. If possible, a fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of the FDC. PFA Bureau Policy Number: 76 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] KNOX BOX REQUIRED: PLEASE NOTE: PFA might require more than one Knox Box for the King Soopers building, due to its size. Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC 902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20 Number: 77 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] WATER SUPPLY: PLEASE NOTE: Contact me if you want to discuss specific locations of and questions regarding fire hydrants. Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include: • Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter • Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter • Residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter. These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 97UFC 901.2.2.2 Number: 78 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] TANK PERMITS: Just a reminder that PFA requires permits to be issued when installing and/or removing underground fuel tanks, and requires that two sets of plans be submitted for review. Plans must show the layout of the USTs, number of tanks, size and construction materials. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Matt Wempe Topic: General Number: 56 Created: 12/31/2008 [12/31/08] Transportation Planning concurs with Engineering's comments regarding the College and Willox roadway (see Comment 44). In particular, LCUASS requires that ADA Page 9 ramps are directional instead of flared, that the bicycle lane striping is consistent along Willox, and that the eastbound lane into the roundabout be revised to discourage cars from using the bicycle lane as an acceleration lane Number: 57 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] As discussed at the 12/31 Staff Review meeting, I'll defer the details on how the sidewalk in the northwest corner of the site joins with College Avenue to Engineering - Capital Projects. Number: 58 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Please continue working with Nicole Hahn at Transfort regarding the details of transit stops along College and Willox. Nicole will be in contact shortly regarding easement and shelter needs. Number: 59 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The 8-foot bicycle lane coming from the north should connect to the front walkway along the King Sooper's building. Any connection through parking areas should include ADA ramps and crosswalk striping. Number: 60 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The internal sidewalk network should be revised to show crossings where needed. The ADA ramps should be directional instead of flared. Topic: Site Plan Number: 61 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Please see my redlines for concerns and potential solutions regarding connectivity with the internal sidewalk system. Number: 62 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Bicycle parking locations and rack details should be included in the plans. Parking should be located on a hard surface as close to the building entrance as possible. Covered or indoor parking is encouraged where possible. Number: 63 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] Please use a consistent cross -hatch, shading or other method to indicate where the sidewalks and crosswalks are located. Sidewalk width should also be noted on the plans. Number: 64 Created: 12/31 /2008 [12/31/08] The sidewalks running through the parking islands should be located to ensure a clear path free from vehicle overhang or other encroachments. Page 10 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 37 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show water and sewer mains and services on the landscape plan and locate the trees and shrubs to provide the required separations from water and sewer lines. Topic: Plat Number: 30 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Show the easement for the existing 6-inch sanitary. A portion of this easement (north of the new MH to be installed) is to be abandoned. If no easement exists, include an easement on Lt 5 for the portion of the sewer that is to remain plus 15 feet north of the proposed MH. Number: 31 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Increase the total width of the utility easement across Lt 2 (where the water main is being added) to 35 feet. Number: 32 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Sewer service lines are privately maintained and do not need to be in utility easements. Curb stops must be in utility easements. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 81 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] The main issue before the PDP can go to a public hearing is providing the required water quality treatment for the entire site before the drainage enters the wetland that the City will own. Per the meeting on Monday, December 22nd, some possible solutions were discussed on how to provide the required water quality mitigation. Please provide a revised plan to the City once completed. We can meet before the next submittal to help expedite the process in regards to this issue. If a PLD or forbay is proposed that extends into the wetland, that land will need to be platted as part of the private property, and not the land the City will own. Number: 82 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] There are no more major comments that need to be addressed before the hearing besides comment 81. During final compliance review, a detailed review will take place of the site grading, erosion control measures, and all hydraulics. I did review the hydraulics that was submitted, and found no comments. Number: 83 Created: 1 /2/2009 [1/2/09] Please provide the HGL on the storm sewer profiles at final compliance. Remember the maximum parking lot ponding is 1 foot. The inlet calcs show you are meeting this requirement. Page 11 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 17 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Sheet C-002 includes reference to "Loveland GMA". Number: 18 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Label size of all water and sewer services and fire lines. Number: 19 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Label all valves, fittings, curb stops, meter pits, etc., etc. on the water main plans. Number: 20 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Locate the curb stops and meter pits in landscaped areas near the water mains. Number: 21 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Provide a minimum of 10 feet of separation between the water mains and the underdrains. Number: 22 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Add the water main connection to College Avenue and the connection to the main in Grape Street. Number: 23 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show the portion of the existing water main in College that is to be abandoned. Add notes to coordinate the abandonment with City Water Utility. "Call Fort Collins Utilities (416-2165) to coordinate the abandonment". Number: 24 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Show the existing water services to 1404 and 1406 N College and the south side of Grape Street. Add notes on abandonment similar to previous comment. Number: 25 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Move the water service and fire line for Lt 3 onto Lt 3. Number: 26 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Add an enlarged detail for the fire hydrant to be installed at the west end of the existing 6-inch water main in Grape. Number: 27 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Show the curb stop and meter pit for Lt 2. Number: 28 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Label all water main lowerings and include a table to supplement the lowering details as noted for the "Wetlands PDP" submittal. Page 12 Number: 29 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Add the tracer wire details for PVC water mains (Std Details 25 and 30). Number: 33 Created: 12/29/2008 [12/29/08] Irrigation taps? Number: 34 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Replace the existing MH where the proposed sewer connects to the existing sewer. Number: 35 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] Minimum cover for a sanitary sewer is 4 feet. Number: 36 Created: 12/29/2008 [ 12/29/08] See redlined plans for other comments/questions. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] Remove sign details from drawings. Signs must comply with the sign code. Since the property is not in the residential neighborhood sign district, signs are reviewed only at time of sign permit application. Showing signs now will give the wrong impression that the signs will be ok, but that's not known yet. i.e. the monument sign shown might comply, but until we know exact location we don't know for sure. So remove all signs. Number: 2 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] In addition to the site plan sheets submitted, an overall site plan should be provided at a smaller scale showing the entire site on one sheet. It makes it much easier to reference to ensure that nothing is missed. The site plan sheets submitted with this round are difficult to review since parts of buildings are continued on the next sheet. Also, it would be helpful to label the buildings in some manner (i.e. bldg 1, 2, 3, etc.). Number: 3 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] Show the dimensions of the width of the handicap parking spaces and abutting aisle. Some of the spaces are dimensioned and others aren't. Some buildings don't appear to have handicap spaces, i.e. the buildings on sheet 12. There must be handicap parking spaces located as close as possible to building entrances. Number: 4 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] The land use table on the cover sheet should provide more specific information regarding the proposed uses. "Commercial" is too broad a term. Page 13 Number: 5 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] The land use table indicates that the maximum building height is 5 stories. That is the max allowed in the zone, but unless you're proposing 5 story buildings, it should be changed to indicate the maximum height you're actually proposing. Number: 6 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] Indicate colors of the fuel canopy on the elevation drawings. Number: 7 Created: 12/19/2008 [12/19/08] provide standard notes on cover sheet regarding such things as shielded, down - directional lighting, mechanical screening, trash enclosure material. Note on lighting must also state that under -canopy fueling areas shall feature flush -mounted, flat lens light fixtures. Number: 8 Created: 12/19/2008 [ 12/19/08] Show wall -mounted light fixture locations on building elevations. The lighting plan indicates some wall fixtures on the King Soopers building, but only on the rear and north side. Does that mean that there won't be any on the front of the building? Number: 9 Created: 12/22/2008 [ 12/22/08] With the site plan broken up on numerous sheets, it's not east to confirm that there aren't more than 15 parking spaces in a row, without an intervening landscape island. Please make sure that parking rows are limited to no more than 15 spaces without such an island. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Red -lined plans from City departments are included with this comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. At the staff review meeting on December 3 1 " it was determined that another round of staff review is necessary. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being January 12, 2009) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached REVISION ROUTING SHEET. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, 4Stev6e01t �vv City's Project Planner Page 14 City of Fort Collins BHA Design, Inc. c/o David Kasprzak 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Date: 1 /16/2009 REVISED Staff has reviewed your submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE, PHASE 2, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN - TYPE 2, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Advance Planning Topic: General Number: 109 [1 /15/09] Architecture: Issue Contact: Clark Mapes Created: 1 /15/2009 Anchor bldg: sections of the building do not quite meet the massing variation requirements in 3.5.3(C) and 3.5.4(C). Long uniform walls need additional variation to complement the storefronts. Response: The elevations have been revised to provide additional variation at the long uniform walls. A recent North College Corridor Plan describes a desired character for the North College corridor as a distinct part of the city. It emphasizes brick and stone instead of block; architectural use of metal instead of artificial stucco, and exposed steel or timber structural members. The point is to relate more to either a traditional downtown feel, a semi -industrial feel, or a great outdoors feel (such as with timber, stone, or other heavy, textured materials) and less to a typical suburban feel that commonly characterizes recent development. This may be worth a conversation, and/or viewing a few pages of the Plan online for a little more explanation of intent. Response: The design approach for the development has been revised to focus on the traditional downtown feel of Ft. Collins. Architectural detailing used at the Anchor building has been carried through the overall development. One particular opportunity is presented by the fascias at the top of the anchor building — these should feature more significant, 3-dimensional cornices or building cap elements to further mitigate the massive horizontal effect of the building. Response: Additional architectural variation, including different roof treatments at each building entry, second level windows, and a 3-dimensional or projected cornice has been introduced to the Anchor facade. These elements break the mass of the structure down to smaller elements and provide greater architectural interest. Page 1 cc: Marc Virata Dana Leavitt Loveland Commercial BHA Design AYRES Associates Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. Current Planning file #39-08 Page 15 The gas canopy and structures should be designed to relate better to the architecture of the other buildings. The canopy could have a roof; it should not have stripes; the shacks should have architectural details to relate to building architecture. Although this gas pad appears to be treated as a more utilitarian component, it will have a powerful visual effect that could detract from the look and feel of the center. Response: The gas canopy and related structures have been revised to incorporate architectural detailing common to the overall development. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 108 Created: 1 /15/2009 [1/15/09] Landscape Plan: A long hedge planting is needed along the entire north perimeter along the "Grape Street" area, wrapping around the NW corner of parking, to screen the vehicle use areas. Response: The site plan has been adjusted to allow for the introduction of a 6 foot high privacy fence along the "Grape Street " area to provide screening of vehicle uses. Portions of the fence will be complemented by shrubs or ornamental grasses utilized throughout the development to further enhance the aesthetics of the buffer. Department: Advance Planning Issue Contact: Pete Wray Topic: Site Plan Number: 106 Created: 1 /14/2009 [1 /14/09] Department: Advance Planning Issue Contact: Clark Mapes Topic: Site Plan Number: 107 Created: 1 /15/2009 [1 /15/09] Building D: -does not meet the Connecting Walkway standard 3.5.3(B). -it will not be possible to meet the standard at the location of this building, but perhaps there are ways to improve internal connectivity to a degree. -question: are the extra vehicle lanes shown on 2 sides of the building necessary? Shown as placeholders for potential drive-thru uses? They add complexity and make the trail & bridge connection to the north awkward. Response: The extra vehicular lanes shown are placeholders for potential drive thru users. The design of the walkways adjacent to Building D have been modified to allow pedestrian connectivity between the trail system and North College. The pedestrian connectivity between the various buildings has also been improved. Main south entry drive, question: Is the discontinuity in the main front drive aisle intended to discourage drivers from choosing that direction? It looks like a constant irritation requiring a small non - directional course with extra turns in a crowded area. It also creates non -directional travel for pedestrians. Response: The design of the front drive aisle has been modified to reduce the severity of the curves which will allow for improved vehicular or bicycle access. The Page 2 sidewalks throughout the site have been modified to provide directional travel routes for pedestrians. Pedestrian circulation: -there is no pedestrian connection to the north "Grape Street" area. Response: Pedestrian access to the site from the "Grape Street" area is provided via. the trail adjacent to the wetlands. This approach allows for an accessible means of access to the main pedestrian circulation paths through the site. -pedestrian access from the south and around the roundabout is indirect, requiring significant non -directional walking. The two large sidewalks flanking this main entry lead "nowhere". Sidewalk alignments in this area should be adjusted to be more user-friendly rather than following the vehicle trajectories at the roundabout and in the parking lots. Some logical adjustments would also increase the 4' parkway strip at the roundabout. We find that 4' strips as shown are a permanent ongoing irrigation problem. Response: The sidewalks have been modified to provide more direct pedestrian access to the site. The parkway strip has been increased to at least 7 feet allowing for the success of the plantings in that area. -a sidewalk should connect directly from N. College Ave. to the building on the south side of the north entry. It appear that maybe there's a grade difference -if so, are steps possible? (can still retain the longer connection to the north corner as shown if needed for ADA access.) Response: The sidewalk configuration has been adjusted to provide access from North College to the entry of the building which is located on the southern facade. -a few other minor details are shown to ease ends and corners of walkways (enclosed redlines.) Response: Corners and ends of walkways have been eased as discussed. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 110 Created: 1 /16/2009 [1/16/09] We had a meeting several weeks ago to discuss the parking stall dimensions & drive aisle widths. Staff had concerns about the proposal but the applicant could request a modification of the standard(s). Has a decision been made and will staff be seeing a formal request for modification of standard(s)? Response: The submitted plan incorporates a reduced drive aisle width allowing for an increase in landscaped areas in the parking field. A formal request for modification will be submitted. Number: 111 Created: 1 /16/2009 [1/16/09] In general, the Site Plan set is very difficult to read and follow from sheet to sheet. Line weights/differentiations could be better and labeling of buildings, etc. on each sheet would make for better relationships between sheets. Response: Line weights have been adjusted and buildings are identified on each sheet along with a key for each sheet. Page 3