HomeMy WebLinkAboutMOUNTAIN RIDGE FARM PUD FOURTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-04-25Dave Stringer - Mountain Ridge Farms IV velopment Agreement Page 1 I
From: George Hart <ghart@progliv.com>
To: TS.ENG_NET(DSTRINGER)
Date: Tue, Apr 10, 2001 11:27 AM
Subject: Mountain Ridge Farms IV Development Agreement
4/10101
Dave,
Here are our comments on the draft agreement we received in the mail last
Friday.
1. In the first paragraph, add "Inc." at the end of "Progressive Living
Structures".
2. On page 3, paragraph H., The fifth sentence beginning with "Failure of
the City to give notice of such claim to the Developer within ninety (90)
days ...". We request a notice within 30 days instead of 90.
3. On page 6, paragraph C. 3., the erosion control deposit seems excessive.
Can this be lowered.
4. On page 7, paragraph D.2., there is a requirement that the development
construction permit nor building permits cannot be issued until Seneca
Street is constructed by Mountain Ridge Farms PUD 3rd Filing. We request
you approve the development construction permit and withhold building
permits only unitl the completion of Seneca by Mountain Ridge Farms 3rd. We
may want to start this project before Seneca is completed by MRF 3rd.
5. On page 9, paragraph EA. refers to a 90 day notice to the developer, we
request a 30 day notice.
6. On page 9, paragraph H.I. refers to Exhibit "C" but no Exhibit was
provided.
7. On page 10, paragraph 1.2. states the developer will be reimbursed for
the local portion of Westfield Drive, does this include water and sewer main
installation costs? I have attached a spreadsheed with an estimate of the
reimbursement costs which we would like referenced in the text and made part
of the Development Agreement. If the City does not provide reimbursement
for water and sewer, we would like additional language that requires any
future development on the south side of Westfield Drive which taps the water
or sewer in Westfield Drive will be required to repay Progressive Living
Structures Inc.half the installation costs plus inflation.
Mark McCallum told me we have to complete this agreement by April 15th. What
are the consequences of missing this deadline.
Thanks for your attention in this matter
George Hart
<<Streetrepay.xls»
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: December 29, 1999 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: # 18-92F Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 4th Filing Final -
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments must be received by: January 26, 2000
General Comments
♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, site, and landscape plans. More specific comments
will be mentioned below. If you have any questions please call me (Mark McCallum) at 221-6605.
This project has certain obligations to the proposed bicycle/ pedestrian path and the associated bridge
structure. As the result of negotiations with Mountain Ridge Farms, 2" filing, % of the bicycle/
pedestrian path (the other '/ will be paid for by the City's Parks and Rec. Dept.) and '/z the associated
bridge structure will be funded on a per lot basis for each lot approved on the Preliminary Mountain
Ridge Farms, PUD. (All lots within the first filing, which is already under construction, were
included in the over all fee.) The total fee for this subdivision is calculated as shown: 36 lots
160.45/lot = $5776.32. Please contact me (Mark McCallum) if a further explanation is needed.
As 1 am sure you are aware, Mountain Ridge 3`d Filing has incorporated the Seneca Street design in
with their plans. For the sake of clarity, I just want to reiterate that Westfield Park PUD, currently is
only in construction phase 1, which does not complete Seneca Street to the north boundary of this
development, and Mountain Ridge Farms 3'd Filing has only been through one round of review. In
the event that this project desires to proceed prior to Westfield Park PUD 2" d Phase or prior to
Mountain Ridge Farms 3rd Filing, this project will be obligated to construct Seneca Street adjacent to
this project, to the north where Seneca Street ends at construction phase 1 of Westfield Park PUD,
and to the south where Seneca Street ends at the proposed alignment of Troutman Parkway. Finally,
omit any notes that state Seneca Street will be completed as a part of Mountain Ridge Farms 3 a
Filing and submit the design of Seneca Street with this plan set.
Date: 1 31 0n:::i Signature:
PLEASEI SEND COPIES PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: SITE ❑ `W UTILITY NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
X LANDSCAPE
The traffic impact study for the Mountain Ridge Farms Preliminary/ Phase 1 is outdated. Please
submit an updated traffic impact study for review. In the event that the traffic impact study suggests
that this development be required to provide any additional traffic measures or connections, this
development will be responsible to comply with the study. An update to the traffic impact study has
been requested from other developments in this area. It is encouraged that this development
combined efforts with the surrounding developments.
Utility Plan Comments
Cover Sheet; Sheet 1 of 18:
♦ Revise the General Notes as redlined.
♦ Label the Plat independently.
Windcreek Court, Sheet 9 of 18:
♦ Please correctly label all curve and line data.
♦ Please see Seneca Street comment made above and add note to this sheet regarding its construction.
♦ The K-value at the end of the cul-de-sac should be at least 10. Please correct the vertical curve.
♦ Please show the curb return elevations at the Windcreek Court/ Seneca Street intersection.
Westfield Drive; Sheet 10 of 18:
♦ Please show the bicycle and pedestrian path with an access ramp at the end of the court ("SDM"
Detail D-4).
♦ Please correctly label all curve and line data. Also, check to make sure the data is correct as shown in
the table.
♦ The northern curb return should be a minimum of 0.4-% ("SDM" Section 1.02.03.09.g)
Intersection Details; Sheet 11 of 18:
♦ The cross pan for Windcreek Court does not meet the minimum requirement of 0.6-% ("SDM"
Section 1.02.03.12.c). Please correct the slope.
♦ Please check the Windcreek Court intersection detail against the profile. It appears some elevations
are shown incorrectly.
Utility Plan; Sheet 12 of 18:
♦ Please dedicate a sight distance easement as shown on this plan.
♦ Please add this note: All streets cuts, curb & gutter and sidewalk removal, and the repair &
reconstruction of the aforementioned shall be done in accordance with the city's "Street Repair and
Reconstruction Standards and Standards and Guidelines". The city inspector and/ or the City
Engineer shall have final authority in regard to the limits of the street repair.
Street Details; Sheet 15 of 18:
♦ Please include driveway detail D-14 and an access ramp detail for the bicycle/ ped. path at the end of
Westfield Drive.
Plat Comments
♦ Please reference and apply all Mapping and Drafting comments.
♦ Please note that all tracts are to be maintained by the H.O.A.
♦ Please include the sight distance easement and include the sight distance language as provided.
♦ Please label Tract A as drainage and access easement.
Site and Landscape Plan
♦ Please make sure that the site and landscape plan are representative of the utility plan , and vice versa.
♦ Please include the sight distance easement language on the Landscape Plan and provide the proper
sight line for that easement.
Dave Stringer - Re: Mountain Ridge Farm 'V Development Agreement Page 2
construction permit nor building permits cannot be issued until Seneca
Street is constructed by Mountain Ridge Farms PUD 3rd Filing. We request
you approve the development construction permit and withhold building
permits only unitl the completion of Seneca by Mountain Ridge Farms 3rd. We
may want to start this project before Seneca is completed by MRF 3rd.
5. On page 9, paragraph EA. refers to a 90 day notice to the developer, we
request a 30 day notice.
6. On page 9, paragraph H.1. refers to Exhibit "C' but no Exhibit was
provided.
7. On page 10, paragraph 1.2. states the developer will be reimbursed for
the local portion of Westfield Drive, does this include water and sewer main
installation costs? I have attached a spreadsheed with an estimate of the
reimbursement costs which we would like referenced in the text and made part
of the Development Agreement. If the City does not provide reimbursement
for water and sewer, we would like additional language that requires any
future development on the south side of Westfield Drive which taps the water
or sewer in Westfield Drive will be required to repay Progressive Living
Structures Inc.half the installation costs plus inflation.
Mark McCallum told me we have to complete this agreement by April 15th. What
are the consequences of missing this deadline.
Thanks for your attention in this matter
George Hart
<<Streetrepay.xls>>
CC:"Ischuster@progliv.com"@FCI.GWIA
Dave Stringer Re Mountain Ridge Farr IV Development Agreement
e1,
From: Dave Stringer
To: "ghart@progliv.com"@FC1.GWIA
Date: Wed, Apr 11, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mountain Ridge Farms IV Development Agreement
George,
I have had the oppurtunity to review the proposed changes to the Development Agreement you have
proposed. Following is my response per each item listed.
1. 1 will add Inc. to the legal name pages 1 and 13
2. The request to limit the notice period is denied. This is boiler plate language drafted by our attorney
and 90 days is a reasonable time period
3. The dollar amount as listed came from your consulting engineers estimate and approved by the Storm
Water Utility. I advise that the estimated costs be reevaluated by your consultant and resubmitted to
Storm Water for their evaluation
4. 1 agree with your request. The paragraph will be modified to rflect with holding of building permits and
not to include the DCP.
5. Same response as number 2 above
6. 1 will add Exhibit C; to next draft. It is the maintenace language as shown on the plat.
7. LUC Section 3.3. F (2) lists the criteria for a repay agreement. This is document separate to the DA.
Cotact Matt Baker, Street Oversizing for the Repay Agreement and information. 221- 6108.
1 will make reference to it in the DA. ie, The Developer intends to file for a Repay Agreement with the
City.
With the nature of the minor comments from you and our attorney, I propose to have the DA copies
ready for you tomorrow afternoon for your signatures. If this is not acceptable, let me know, and I will
send out another draft for final review before printing the actual document.
Dave Stringer
>>> George Hart <ghart@progliv.com> 04/10 11:27 AM >>>
4/10/01
Dave,
Here are our comments on the draft agreement we received in the mail last
Friday.
1. In the first paragraph, add "Inc." at the end of "Progressive Living
Structures".
2. On page 3, paragraph H., The fifth sentence beginning with "Failure of
the City to give notice of such claim to the Developer within ninety (90)
days ...". We request a notice within 30 days instead of 90.
3. On page 6, paragraph C. 3., the erosion control deposit seems excessive.
Can this be lowered.
4. On page 7, paragraph D.2., there is a requirement that the development
), Pt,/"-r '�" L.c c�k L voti1T coos . �
r T
L SHOW 114c` k?Ntc 4C,4S LJ�01C 3 l �O
S
�. To Ml Ian 1LGOCz�r T��� ` rCr G�P_Nv�A St4c
THiF C 4
IN d Sl E !-1 i
/�,STgIJccS �.4JEh?��r lS UN hoc. ?-,43CCr
ISE-�2iAMi !N' LCG Rc- l�o LTJ A/u T-r%A re IV cam%
Date: Signature:_
CHECK fIDffTYGOTVISfiTC
site Drainage Report _ Other
— Utility _ Redline Utility — Landscape
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: June 12, 2000 TO: Mapping
PROJECT: #18-92F Mountain Ridge Farms PUD 4th Filing
Final (LDGS)
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the
staff review meeting:
Wednesday, June 28, 2000
No Comment
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE**
(�'. rc1 T 1)c&s nlda S I-k , CA) (_,AJI s lq
r U
6
5
0
J
M
{ PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 112, 2000 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: # 18-92F Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 4th Filing Final -
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments ;must be received by: June 28, 2000
See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, site, and landscape plans. More specific
comments will be mentioned below. If you have any questions please call me (Mark McCallum) at
221-6605.
Please rectify the Seneca Street elevation difference. As I understand it, the applicant for Westfield
Park (which is the same for this development) will be revising the Seneca Street profile to match the
plan submitted by Dennis Donovan for Mountain Ridge Farms, 3'd. Those revisions shall be
completed prior to a public hearing for this project.
Is the emergency access required at the end of Westfield Drive? If so, the access shall not have the
appearance of a street. The access must have bollards to delineate the difference. PFA shall
determine if it is needed and how it should be constructed.
Does the Developer need easements to construct the emergency access drive? The proposed tie-in is
offsite, but is it in the county rieht-of-way. In addition. please provide more spot elevations to show
the tie-ins.
Site and Landscape Plan
Please make sure that the site and landscape plan are representative of the utility plan, and vice versa.
Please include the sight distance easement language on the Landscape Plan and provide the proper
sight line for that easement.
Date: ���/ Signature:.
PLEASE SEND COPIES UJI-AT
OF MARKED REVVISIONS SITE
UTILITY ❑ NO COMMENTS - SUBMIT MYLARS
_-ate ANDSCAPE
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: September 28, 2000 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: #18-92F Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 4th Filing Final -
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments must be received by: October 18, 2000
♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, site, and landscape plans. More specific
comments will be mentioned below. If you have any questions please call me (Mark McCallum) at
221-6605.
♦ As a reminder: The Developer is responsible to construct one-half the 8-foot width of the
proposed city recreational trail adjacent to the site and the associated bridge structure. Since the
proposed city trail has not been constructed offsite of this development and since the city does not
have monies at this time to participate in the oversizing of the trail adjacent to the site, the Developer
and the City agree that the Developer shall escrow $5,776.32 for the recreational trail and associated
bridge structure prior to issuance of any building permits. (The escrow amount is based on a per lot
fee ($160.45/lot for the recreational trail shown on the approved Preliminary Mountain Ridge Farms
P.U.D.)
♦ Please rectify the (Seneca Street elevation difference. As I understand it, the applicant for Westfield
Park (which is the same for this development) will be revising the Seneca Street profile to match the
plan submitted by Dennis Donovan for Mountain Ridge Farms, 3`d. Those revisions shall be
completed prior to a public hearing for this project.
♦ The north property line grading does not tie-in onsite. The public hearing can not be scheduled until
the easements are received. If revisions to Westfield Park will rectify the situation, then those will
have to be completed prior to public hearing.
♦ Please provide more information for the access ramp/ emergency access at the end of Westfield
Drive. Also, show how the sidewalk connects into the city park sidewalk (for about 50 feet).
♦ The north cul-de-sac does not tie-in to the proposed Seneca Street grades. Please correct the
elevations.
Date: �'- 4 /X-) Signature: ✓� L /
PLEASPIES APLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: SITE ❑ NO COMMENTS - SUBMIT MYLARS
UTILITY
LANDSCAPE
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: September 28, 2000 TO: Tech Services
PROJECT: #18-92F Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 4th Filing
PDP -Type II- LUC
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, October 18, 2000
❑ No Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE**
� �-�C� ✓l s e ��S � 0 6 e o't � Size 4 �t d � I vl @. `��1 t'c �'>1 �^s5
OL Gnu b'Q_ Sc4H�e� 4Jo\� °lee
3 INC L 1/`{ Co1:zjje2 �S ��TSCl2tr3�p ti ��G /� 11S Wfc,�
11I� /tlo Co�N� Si-loc j Cl-j P q-r- C^t SNtc n� JT 1 1S
ISa l7 �q o� Sr'g17_� Ca5et,,"ek7L' r:s got vk,
Date: Signature:_
CHECK URFIF OTWI5I O RETER
N_ Plat _ site — Drainage Report _ other
ptility Redline Utility — Landscape
/Ar9M PROJECT
i�.� COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: December 29, 1999 TO: Street Oversizing
PROJECT: #18-92F Mountain Ridge Farm P.U.D. 4th Filing -
Final (LDGS)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
January 26, 2000
E> Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference a
1 �
Signature
CHECK HEkE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility _Landscape Cryof Poir cou�as
PROJECT
i■�� COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planninle
DATE: December 29, 1999 TO: Mapping/Drafting
PROJECT: #18-92F Mountain Ridge Farm P.U.D. 4th Filing -
Final (LDGS)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting;:
January 26, 2000
Ei Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference a
�LAf /70�5 ✓T Gr✓� z�,,J&N /4l 414AT/onl 5NcW"Ve NOV/ TEE �1��/Ca@,r 6 �%4.� NE�s
14�a>< fi-L� . e` L Lra(KS ... -;.•�%: f.;- r:!
ti� 4
�o ^�OT GtI�.SE. �cv l'7�7
v t'i
�i-CAsc SN��--� f-�-ow s E. N5C�1 .1 T• WAS �E O ICA Tom.0 .
Signature
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report _Other
_Utility Redline Utility _Landscape
mrt� Q DV F4
Citv of Fort Collins