The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHARRISONS ADDITION BLOCK 96 REPLAT LOT 8 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-04-21Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments CitvoE tort Colt;ins wwamm ®® Department: Engineering Date. October 17, 2001 Project: MELDRUM/MYRTLE 4-PLEX PDP -TYPE 1 #13-01 All comments must be received by BOB BARKEEN in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 10, 2001 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore 74 Cover sheet: Please correct general notes where redlined. 89 Plat: Please remove the Vested Rights Statement. 90 Overall Utility Plan: Single parking space off of Myrtle should be a minimum of 20' deep (repeat). There is a tree being shown in a pedestrian ramp. See plan for any additional comments. 91 Grading Plan: Please revise grading on sidewalk connection to the north entrance to the building as discussed. to . 1 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS X Plat Site Drainage Report Other x Utility _X Redline Utility X Landscape Page 1 Comments continued from the previous page... • Provide a title block in the lower right corner that includes the name of the project, name of the sheet, sheet number, engineer's name, address, and phone number, etc. • You will need to contact the property owners about their landscaping. This is encroaching into the public R.O.W. and will need to be removed prior to the construction of the alley. • The entrance still does not meet the standards. Refer to the current standards in the "Design and Construction Criteria, Standards and Specifications for Streets, Sidewalks, Allcys, and Other Public Ways" manual. • Some of the text is still too hard to read. • The scale of the entire site does not match the proposed scale. Make the appropriate corrections. Recheck the entire site and submit again. • The Site Plan, Utility Plan, and Grading Plan do not match. Please correct. • The concrete pan at the entrance to the alley does need to be replaced to meet the current standards. • Refer to the Site Plan for comments about the parking stalls. • See Sheet I of 5 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 2 of 5: Utility Plan • You need to provide an 8' utility easement along the westside of the alley per City standards. • You will need to relocate the electric box into the easement. • See comments on Sheet 1 of 5. • Show the storm sewers, inlets, etc. on this sheet. We need to know if there will be any conflicts. • See Sheet 2 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 3 of 5: Grading and Drainage Plan • This sheet does not match the Site Plan and Utility Plan. • You need to provide a minimum of 2% cross -slope on the alley. • See additional comments and concerns on Sheet 3. Sheet 4 of 5: Storm Drain Plan and Profile/Details • The driveway entrance to the site is incorrect for a driveway approach off of an alley. i.e. There aren't any sidewalks and there are supposed to be tapers. Sheet 5 of 5: Utility Detail Sheet • Delete the General Notes. • See comments on Sheet 1. City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 3/216/97 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DEPT:Engineering - Tim B. PROJECT: Myrtle Street Village Apartments PLANNER: None UBR ENGINEER: Tim Blanford (Return) A11 comments must be received by: 4/15/97 ®No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS: Sheet C: Cover Sheet • The title of the plan set should read "Utility Plans for..." • Vicinity map needs to show a horizontal scale and a north arrow. • General notes need to be shown on this sheet. Please refer to the attachment included with these comments. • Provide the engineers name, address, phone number, etc. • We would like you to provide us with a soils report and pavement design per new city standards as of April, 1996. • Need to reference the bench mark from the "Black Bolt Survey". Sheet 1 of 5: Site Plan Comments continued on the next page 9• Date: H.9,n Signature',,, t_ PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ® PLAT ® SITE ■ UTILITY ® LANDSCAPE Comments continued from the previous page... • The legal description should be shown on the cover sheet as part of the title. • The new street standards state that the minimum width of a drive lane in a parking lot is 24'. The site plan is showing 20'. This needs to be corrected. • Handicap parking stalls are required to be a minimum of 12' wide with ramp access to sidewalks. The handicap parking stalls that are shown are 11'. Please modify. • For compact parking stalls, the minimum length is 19' for a configuration as shown. You need to modify these to meet the current street standards. • Need to provide handicap access ramps from the parking lot to the sidewalks. • From a pedestrian standpoint, a sidewalk should connect, along building "D", to the sidewalk on the north side of the parking lot. See plans for the location. • Show all existing features with hidden lines to distinguish from the proposed features better. • I'm concerned with the handicap parking spaces and their locations. It seems as though it will be hard for cars to back out. Consider redesigning. • The sidewalk on the south side of building "D" needs to be 6' wide to accommodate for a 2' overhang from parked cars. • Some of the text is difficult to read. Please modify. • Show a typical cross-section of -the alley as well as several working cross -sections with all water and sewer crossings. • The driveway entrance does not meet the new street standards. Please redesign to meet standards. Sheet 2 of 5 • Show all property lines and easement lines more clearly. • Show storm inlets, pipes, etc. • Include a legend identifying symbols and line types used. • Distinguish existing and proposed features better. i.e. use hidden lines for all existing features and solid, darker lines for proposed features. • Would like to see existing features for 150' outside of the project limits. • How does the existing sidewalk tie-in to the alley? Will part of the sidewalk have to be removed and replaced? Please clarify. • Will you be cutting into Myrtle Street? If so you will need to coordinate with Rick Richter. The city is planning to do some improvements on this street. • Make sure that the pavement design complies with the new standards for streets. Sheet 3 of 5 Would like to see a flowline profile of the alley with elevations, stationing, etc. Label the proposed contours more clearly. Comments continued on the next page uw Comments continued from the previous page... The cross -sections of the alley are incomplete. Need to see full cross -sections with all relevant information including cross -slopes, elevations, etc. Provide a vertical scale. Identify on the plan view where the profile begins and ends. Show stationing on the plan view. Sheet 4 of 5 Make sure that all of the details have been referenced throughout the plan set. Correct the stationing on the profile. Dimension the area of concrete being saw cut and replaced. Sheet 5 of 5 Make sure that all of the details have been referenced throughout the plan set. The general notes need to be shown on the cover sheet. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: Sepl.ember 21, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #13-01 Meldrum/Myrtle - 4 Plex PDP -Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: October 10, 2001 ❑ No Comment ElProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) �;q/ N)eSn19, MAP "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** F)MCK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONSSignature:_ Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility Redd ne Utility _ Landscape i SEP 2 5 2001 Citv of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 3.9.01 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #13-01 Meldrum/Myrtle 4-Plex PDP— Type I (LUC) PLANNER: Brian Grubb ENGINEER: ]Katie Moore All comments must be received by: 4.4.01 ❑ No Problems R1 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: • Please submit a plat and soils report. • Utility plan cover sheet: • Please reference updated/current soils report • Please provide indemnification statement (see attached utility plan checklist). • Please provide name/address/phone for developer and owner • Plat: Please provide current plat language (attached) Please show in!Formation to standards (see attached utility plan checklist), dedicating appropriate easements. • Overall utility plan: • Please label all ROW and easements for Myrtle/Meldrum/alley, and internal to the site. • Sidewalk width should be 4.5' (Table 7-1, street stds) • Please match utility plans with site/landscape plans (specifically: parking pad for existing building off Nleldrurn and curb cut closure along Myrtle). • Along alley, please observe setback requirements (fence minimum 3' from ROW) and design driveway to standards (figure 7-11 F) • Increase building setback from south lot line per zone requirements (4.8.D.3.d). Setback should be 12'. • Trash enclosure is not allowed within the utility easement. • trash show design for PVC pipe outlet at curb. Grading/Drainage/.Erosion Control Plan: • Concentrated runoff is not allowed over a public sidewalk. Please show that this is not occuring. • Please provide 100-year stone statement. Sec ILE on Utility plan checklist. Show temporary as well as permanent erosion control devices. �: Pleas iss��=Atxeu tit rdtt� Date: April 3, 2001 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS Rl Plat 10 Site 2 Utility 21 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS • Detail Sheet: • Please use details from Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. • Site and Landscape plans • Please use a scale of 1:20, 30, 40, or 50. • Please match with utility plans. Parking in yard`? Curb cuts for water line? Need to fix curb/gutter/sw anywhere else'? Improve existing curb cuts to std?-driveway and sidewalk ramps? TIS requirement waived? Development Review Comments — Page 2 PROJECT i..1 COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: March 7, 2001 TO: Street Oversizing PROJECT: #13-01 MELDRUM/MYRTLE 4-PLEX PDP TYPE 1 (LUC) All comments :must be received by Brian Grubb in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: April 4, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference P��- (�o �fjmelot/- _Plat _Utility IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Site _Drainage Report _Other _Redline Utility _Landscape PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Coltins DATE: 2 December, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Myrtle Street Village Apartments ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: December 17, 1997 RNo Problems in Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS: Please address the comments indicated on the utility plans. ad€Jr,essEd- -a4egA*3fte sthent--F.ewew D€ga�-#eFr-eutuag. Date: Signature: ��- PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ® PLAT ® SITE ® UTILITY ® LANDSCAPE PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins DATE: 23 October, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Myrtle Street Village Apartments ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: November 12, 1997 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS: Sheet 1 of 5: Site Plan Please modify note number 4 of the General Notes. It currently doesn't match with what is stated on the plans. Make sure that this note matches what is being proposed throughout the plan set. * Since the alley is not 20 feet wide where the entrance to the apartments is, the entrance needs to be flared. Use the values for an alley that is 18 feet wide. Refer to the street standards for these values. * You will need to contact the adjacent property owner and inform them of what you are proposing to do with the alley, more specifically, the paving of the alley. Comments continued on the next page l Date: 44 NGVEMi�F--R r 1997 Signature: PLF;ASF. SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ® SITE ® UTILITY ® LANDSCAPE Comments continued from the previous page... Inform them that they are encroaching in the ROW and that they will need to relocate their plants/flowers so that the alley can be paved. If they do not comply with this, contact a City inspector. * A couple of issues concerning the paving of the alley: 1. You can ask the adjacent property owner(s) to share the cost of the repaving/improvements of the alley since they will be benefitting from it in the e:nd. This way you will not have to bear all of the cost 2. If the adjacent property owner(s) are not willing to contribute in the cost of the alley improvements, you can enter into a repayment agreement. In other words, when the adjacent property redevelops or changes use, they would need to refund you their share of the cost of the alley improvements. * See sheet number 1 of 5 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 2 of 5: Utility Plan * See sheet number 2 of 5 for comments and concerns. Sheet 3 of 5: Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan * Revise the note regarding the handicap ramps. * See sheet number 3 of 5 for additional comments and concerns. Sheet 4 of 5: Storm Drain Plan and Profile/Details * Recheck the values for the alley detail. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins DATE: 12 August, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Myrtle Street Village Apartments ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: September 3, 1997 ®No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS: Sheet C Please make the appropriate revisions to the General Notes as indicated on Sheet C. Sec Sheet I of 5 for comments about the title block, revision block, etc. See Sheet C for additional comments and concerns. Sheet l of 5: Site Plan Include a revision area including space for the City. Include a signature block area that is 3.5" x 4.5" in the lower right corner. Comments continued on the next page ne Date: 9 3 `� Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ® PLAT ® SITE ® UTILITY ® LANDSCAPE