Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARTINEZ PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-04-21PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planninc DATE: i/q / OR DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: �0 PLANNER: - ENGINEER: /No Problems LJ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) �y_Q_ �vhrn.u,��p 6Yl b�J O ,�t.LtJ1 � J 072 % �dGIG S Date: Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PL f ❑ SITE ❑---JTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE Page 4 January 30, 1998 Project No. 1558-01-97 Re: Martinez P.U.D. than a curve in the sidewalk where a detached walk is brought to the curb at a corner. 5. The designation of the signs has been added. SHEET 7: The stationing along Sherwood Street features has been revised to match the stationing on Sheet 4. 2. The locations of sections J-J and M-M have been revised. SHEET 8: The valley pan has been revised to provide a minimum of 13/4" depth. 2. A detail ofthe '/2" curb has been added. SHEET 9: A detail of the emergency access connection to the parking lot has been added. A detail of the emergency access connection and 5' concrete path to the Park Access Drive has also been added. SHEET 10: Additional detail has been provided to clarify transitions in grades, street crown, and curb heights. The detail is located in the lower left hand corner of Sheet 6. SHEET 11: The location of the future sidewalk has been revised to tie into the sidewalk south of the sidewalk culvert. The change has been made on other relevant sheets. 2. Wheel stops in the parking area have been added as requested. SHEET 13: The bollards shown blocking the emergency access have been removed. Refer to Sheet 9 for details. The southeast access through the parking lot is restricted by two bollards with a chain, and one "EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY" sign and two "NO PARKING ANY TIME" signs. The northwest access through the Park Access Drive is restricted by two bollards with a chain, and one "EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY" sign. Extra "NO PARKING" signs are not proposed on this access due to the fact that the entire right-hand side of the street is designated as "NO PARKING". SHEET 14: l . The future sidewalk is now shown on this sheet. Page 5 January 30, 1998 Project No. 1558-01-97 Re: Martinez P.U.D. TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS: SHEET 6: 1. The requested sign "DO NOT PASS BIKES IN CIRCLE" has been added to the sheet. SHEET 10: 1. The crosswalk has been added to Mason Street, on the South side of Cherry Street. If you have any further questions or comments, please call me at 226-5334. I believe we have adequately addressed all of your concerns. If there are any further discussion items, we would appreciate sitting down with you and our client to resolve the issues as quickly as possible. Sincerely, Larry7Kctcham, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation Ipk cc Mark Sears, Transportation Services Engineering Dept. Bruce Richardson, Wonderland Hill Development Mikal Torgerson, M. Torgerson Architects �� n)EXt" City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 0)"- PLANNER: ENGINEER No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Martinez PUD January 4, 1998 Plat • Use the new attorney certification paragraph. It is attached to the comments. • The fire access needs to be labeled as an emergency access as it may not be utilized by just the fire authority. • Show the private drive as a public access easement also. • Please provide a recorded copy of the easement or license agreement upon obtaining this. (It is needed before the mylars can be signed.) • Is some sort of easement dedicated to the railroad still needed for where the tracks cross the property and the railroad has quit claimed the land? It may be necessary for the railroad to sign the plat. • Provide places for the reception Ws to be written in in the future for the off site casements. Utility Plans • On the typical street section sheet - please indicate on which street the section lines can be found. See additional comments on this sheet. (Continued on next page) Date: Signature: - - PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE Martinez PUD (page 2 of 2) Mason Court Plan and Profile January 4, 1998 • Just as you have shown it on Sherwood Street provide information on the crown transition and curb height transitions. • There is too much grade change between the railroad crossing and the street pavement. • Provide variance request for the centerline radius not meeting the minimum requirements. • the vertical curves shown do not meet the design speed of 30 mph or a residential street. May wish to address the design speed in the variance for the curve. The vertical curves will need to meet the design speed what ever it is. • Min grade for a cross pan is .6% The mid block pan does not appear to be meeting this. Also a mid block pan needs to have a depth of 1 3/4 inch. Need a detail of this cross pan. Sherwood Street • Provide details for the depressed curb. • does there need to be some sort of a transition from the driveway x-section to the depressed curb section? • Provide flowline profiles. • Minimum depth for a cross pan is 1 3/4 inch. Mason court • 1 did not get a cross slope of 2.0% for the road section at the cul-de-sac island. • What is the height of the retaining wall that is being shown. • Provide ramp details for those ramps that are not standard and for those that details have not been provided for. • See plans for additional comments. City of Fort Collins Current Plannim DATE: PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: i���.�'`�+��� P� PLANNER ENGINEER: °>1:� C.G,E'� tjNo Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Martinez PUD January 4, 1998 Plat • Use the new attorney certification paragraph. It is attached to the comments. • The fire access needs to be labeled as an emergency access as it may not be utilized by just the fire authority. • Show the private drive as a public access easement also. • Please provide a recorded copy of the easement or license agreement upon obtaining this. (It is needed before the mylars can be signed.) • Is some sort. of easement dedicated to the railroad still needed for where the tracks cross the property and the railroad has quit claimed the land? It may be necessary for the railroad to sign the plat. • Provide places for the reception #'s to be written in in the future for the off site easements. Utility Plans • On the typical street section sheet - please indicate on which street the section lines can be found. See additional comments on this sheet. (Continued on next page) Date:- Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE Martinez PUD (page 2 of 2) Mason Court Plan and Profile January 4, 1998 • Just as you have shown it on Sherwood Street provide information on the crown transition and curb height transitions. • There is too much grade change between the railroad crossing and the street pavement. • Provide variance request for the centerline radius not meeting the minimum requirements. • the vertical curves shown do not meet the design speed of 30 mph or a residential street. May wish to address the design speed in the variance for the curve. The vertical curves will need to meet the design speed what ever it is. • Min grade for a cross pan is .6% The mid block pan does not appear to be meeting this. Also a mid block pan needs to have a depth of 1 3/4 inch. Need a detail of this cross pan. Sherwood Street • Provide details for the depressed curb. • does there need to be some sort of a transition from the driveway x-section to the depressed curb section? • Provide flowline profiles. • Minimum depth for a cross pan is 1 3/4 inch. Mason court • I did not get a cross slope of 2.0% for the road section at the cul-de-sac island. • What is the height of the retaining wall that is being shown. • Provide ramp details for those ramps that are not standard and for those that details have not been provided for. • See plans for additional comments. November 26, 1997 Project No: 1558-01-97 Sheri Wamhoff City of Fort Collins Engineering Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Martinez P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Sheri, This is a response to your most recent review comments concerning the final submittal for Martinez P.U.D. The following responses are to general plan redline comments which may not have been noted in your written comments dated October 13, 1997. GENERAL COMMENTS A plat redline indicates a 9' utility easement adjacent to the east side of the Sherwood Street right-of-way. Although the plat does not indicate the existing Sherwood Street right-of-way width, a 9' utility easement has not been provided because of the width of the existing right- of-way. Please see attached Sherwood Street typical section for immediate reference. Ile existing right-of-way is 100' wide with a 36' street. There is an extra 17' of right-of-way behind the proposed walk location to facifltate utilities. The following responses are in the order of your written comments dated October 13, 1997. SITE PLAN Concrete parking curb stops will be provided in the parking spaces adjacent to the Mason Street sidewalk. 2. The future pedestrian path is now located at a point where the tracks are not split. The location is now consistent with the Site Plan, the Landscape Plan, and the final plat. The future walk alignment which is currently shown on all documents was requested (directed) by Clark Mapes in Advanced Planning. Please discuss this issue with Clark if you feel further discussion is necessary. 3. The transit stop is now labeled. _PLAT I �4) The easement which was previously shown (Tract A, Book 1684, Page 895) will be �h �� vacated by separate document. 5. The developer is in the process of obtaining an easement or a license agreement to do the work in the railroad right-of-way. We are attempting to negotiate a grading and drainage easement with the railroad. However, it has been a challenge getting information from the railroad on this item. If you are interested, we will be happy to provide you with our railroad contacts concerning this item. We will provide information as soon as we have it. 6. Additional plat revisions have been made. Other plat revision comments are currently being coordinated and will be completed prior to final approval. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-031 1 PAGE 2 November 26, 1997 Project No: 1558-01-97 Re: Martinez P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado FINAL UTILITY PLANS: 7. A note has been added to the General Notes (General Note 23.) stating that the developer is responsible for all signing and striping. The note reads as follows: 23. Developer is responsible for installation of all new street related signage and striping. Developer is responsible I'or coordinating installation of all signage and striping which relates to the railroad with Burlington Northern Railroad Personnel. S. The future sidewalk connection to the civic center is now shown and is consistent with the Site Plan, the Landscape Plan, and the final plat. The future walk alignment which is currently shown on all documents was requested (directed) by Clark Mapes in Advanced Planning. 9. Concrete parking curb stops will be provided in the parking spaces adjacent to the Mason Street sidewalk. I Al 0. The median at the terminus of Mason Court is now detailed on the Mason Court Detail sheet. Concrete is now shown to the property lines at the drive accesses. We will be requesting a variance for the centerline radius of Mason Court. The variance request will be provided immediately upon completion. The posted speed limit on Mason Court will be 15 MPH. Stamped concrete is now shown on all appropriate sheets. 11. The sidewalk in the emergency access is now consistently labeled as five feet (5') wide on all sheets. The area circled on the profile is at the intersection of the private drive and the parking lot. The private drive has a cross slope from south to north as shown on all the private drive typical sections. It is negotiable by emergency vehicles. 12. Detailed grading of the sidewalk ramps which are not typical are now provided. 13. Street typical sections for all internal streets are included in the plan set. 14. Additional information has been provided at the "at grade" railroad crossing. We have submitted the application to the P.U.C. on 10/21/97 through Mark Sears for their review. We are awaiting approval from the P.U.C. You may want to check with Mark Sears regarding status. A copy of the application is attached for your reference. 15. The concrete drainage pan along the south property line starts on the east side of the 8' walk at Sherwood Street and ends at the parking lot in Lot 12. An eight foot (8') sidewalk culvert is provided at the parking lot. The plans have been clarified. 16. The grading at the eastern end of the site has been revised to provide a smooth access into the park property. PAGE 3 November 26, 1997 Project No: 1558-01-97 Re: Martinez PX.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado 17. A detailed plan view of Sherwood street improvements is now included in the plan set (Sheet 8). The proposed work north of the entry drive will essentially match existing conditions. No modifications to the existing street will be made north of the entry. Sidewalks will be installed. A concrete pan will be constructed in Sherwood on the north side of the track in order to convey stormwater in a historic manner. This pan will have a low point which lines up with the proposed valley pan along the South property line. Detailed spot elevations are shown on the plan view. Therefore, a profile is not needed. Please refer to Sheet 8, the Sherwood Street Plan. If you have further questions or comments, please call at 226-5334. We have addressed all of your comments. Wonderland Hill Development is hoping to get un5je ftonstruction this winter. Sincerely, p Mark Oberschinidt; Design Engineer Shear Engineering Corporation BW S / meo attachments cc: Jim Leach; Wonderland Hill Development Mikal Stephen Torgerson; M Torgerson Architects Jim Sell; Jim Sell Design Clark Mapes; City Advanced Planning Janet Meisel; City of Fort Collins Parks and Rec Tom Dugan; Pinecrest Planning and Design Rev' d by, Brian W. Shear, P. Shear Engineering Corporation REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 10, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #4-97A Martinez PUD (LDGS) Final PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, October 1, 1997 Martinez Pod Site Plan Plat October 13, 1997 If parking goes up to the sidewalk, a sidewalk width of 6 feet is needed to accommodate overhang. Additional sidewalk with will need to be provided to the south, or the curb would need to be move 2 feet south, or curb stops used to prevent overhang. The future pedestrian path would be better located to a point where the tracks are not splitting. Label transit stop. What about the easement that was shown previously that was dedicated to the City on Lot 11? This will need to be vacated by separate document or on this plat. 5. Need an off -site drainage easement to the south. 6. See Plat for additional comments. Utility Plans T Need general note regarding developer responsible for installation of all signing and striping. 8. Show future sidewalk connection to civic center path. 9. If parking goes up to the sidewalk, a sidewalk width of 6 feet is needed to accommodate overhang. Additional sidewalk with will need to be provided to the south, or the curb would need to be move 2 feet south, or curb stops used to prevent overhang. (Continued on Next page) tSi, �p ?r ovide vrE� Liz Date: by- 6-.I.I CHECK HERE IF YOU PH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS at to _ Drainage Repoli _ Oler — Utility I(e&e Utility Lands* City of Fort Collins Current Plannin£ DATE: PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT:�� Martinez PUD - revisions November 12, 1998 On these changes - Need to identify what he revisions are in the revision block. Those that are shown as revisions that occurred before City signature of the plans are not considered revisions by the City. If revision is indicated in the revision block than a change needs to be bubbled on the sheet. Date:�Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS: Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other — Utility __ Redline Utility — Landscape Martinez Pod (page 2 of 2) 10, Fat Tire Lane - October 13, 1997 Elevations are needed around the median, also need to indicate what type of curb is to be used for the median. Provide concrete to the property line at the drive entrances. Need a variance for the centerline radius not meeting minimum requirements. If there is to be stamped concrete in the cul-de-sac, it should be shown on the plans for the cul-de-sac also (it is currently indicated on the private drive plan and profile) 11. Emergency access - The sheets are conflicting on the size of the ped path that runs through the easement. Some show it as 6 feet and others show it as 5 feet. The profile doesn't look: right to me, if it is I am not sure that it is negotiable by emergency vehicles. 12. Need details for all the sidewalk ramps - non appear to be standard. 13. Need details for access drives - Fat Tire/ Private Drive, Fat Tire/ Parking lot, Fat Tire/ Parks drive 14_ Need additional information at the railroad crossing. 15 Indicate the beginning and the end of the concrete pan south of the property. Is there a curb chase and curb opening needed? 16. The grading to the East where the park access is appears to be rather steep for a drive approach This needs to be flattened out. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: July 9, 1997 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #4-97 Martinez P.U.D. (LDGS) Final PLANNER: Steve Olt All Comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Wednessday, August 6, 1997 Martinez Pud August 10, 1997 Site and Landscape Plans l There are several discrepancies between the site/landscape plan and the utility plans. The access to Sherwood is shown as a curb cut on the utility plans and not a radius access point The path within the emergency access easement is shown to go down the center of the easement, not meander, and is shown as a 6 foot path on the utility plans. The walk along Cherry Street is shown attached on the Utility plans and the utility plans do not show any of the scored or stamped concrete shown in the cul-de-sac. 2. The sidewalk around the cul-de-sac needs to remain detached. 3. A future pedestrian path needs to be indicated going from the building on lot 12 over to Cherry Street to connect to the path shown in the long range down town plan. 4_ Need to see a cross section of what the north side of the cul-de-sac (walk, curb, gutter and retaining wall ) look like. The retaining wall will not be allowed within the ROW, nor will the city take on the maintenance of the structure. The entire area as walk with trees wells maybe allowed. Need to see a detail of what is proposed before a decision can be made. 5_ Some parking spaces in the retail lot will need to be eliminated. Parking needs to be a min of 40 feet from the edge of the travel lane. See Table 5 of the street standards. 6 The width of the access into the parking lot needs to be reduced. Maximum width allowed is 35 feet. (Continued on next Page) Date* 'If (' Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: � Plat Site Drainage Report Other A Utility _r Redline Utility j�Landscape Martinez Pud (Page 2 of 3) Plat August 10, 1997 7. Need to define an emergency access easement across lot 11. 8_ What kind of easement is the easement that is dedicated to the City across Lot 11? Buildings arc being shown where this easement exists. This easement (and any others) that conflict with building envelopes will need to be vacated for the building to be constructed. 9 I believe that Tract B should also be an access, drainage and utility easement. 10. Need to indicate who is to own and maintain the various tracts. 1 I The easements on this plat are very confusing- It is hard to tell where they end and if they overlap. 12. If the flowline radius of the cul-de-sac is to be 50 feet than the cul-de-sac row needs to have a 60.5 foot radius. 13 The cul-de-sac needs to be labeled as Row and be named. 14 Notes for off site easements needs to be modified. Part of what is to be provided is to be ROW. Utility Plans Master Utility Plan 15 The access point off of Sherwood needs to have concrete to the property line. 16. What is the rest of the emergency access composed of There is the 6 foot concrete walk, but what is the rest of it? 17. There appears to be easements shown on this sheet that are not shown on the plat. 18 The sidewalk around the cul-de-sac needs to remain detached in accordance with the standards 19. The accesses coming off of Mason Ct need to have concrete to the property line. 20 A future pedestrian path needs to be indicated going from the building on lot 12 over to Cherry Street to connect to the path shown in the long range down town plan. Mason Court Plan and Profile NoteThe plans call this a private drive. My comments are based on this being a public street. 21. Need to provide a variance request for the centerline radius of this road as it does not meet design requirements. What will the posted speed around this corner need to be? 22 The sidewalk needs to remain detached around the cul-de-sac. 23. It appears that one of the parking spaces in the parking lot encroaches into the ROW. The parking for the parking lot can not encroach into the ROW. 24_ Some parking spaces in the retail lot will need to be eliminated. Parking needs to be a min of 40 feet from the edge of the travel lane. See Table 5 of the street standards 25. The width of the access into the parking lot needs to be reduced. Maximum width allowed is 35 feet. 26 Provide elevations around the median. A 2.0% min slope needs to be maintained. Is this to be vertical outfall gutter? 27. Need to see a cross section of what the north side of the cul-de-sac (walk, curb, gutter and retaining wall ) look like. The retaining wall will not be allowed within the ROW, nor will the city take on the maintenance of the structure. The entire area as walk with trees wells maybe allowed. Need to see a detail of what is proposed. (Continued on next page) Martinez Pud (Page 3 of 3) August 10, 1997 28. The approach grades at the intersection do not meet standards. See Section 1.02.03.05.b of the Street Standards. 29. The vertical curves are not meeting a 30 mph design speed. 30 The radii at the private drive access point need to be 15 foot or the access needs to be designed as a curb cut. 31 Why not use vertical curb here. Either type is allowed, but since all curb cuts are defined don't need roll over curb and gutter for driveway accesses. Cherry and Mason intersection 32 Elevations need to be shown. 33_ Provide details (or enough info on the plans) for the sidewalk ramps. How do these work with the railroad tracks - they are not standard. Grading Plan 34_ Need easements for all off site grading. Details 35 Need details for the access drives coming off of Mason Court. 36. Provide additions to existing walk detail D-20. 37. Provide Detail # 4 or at least the dowel detail portion of Detail # 4. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: April 15, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #4-97 Martinez Park P.U.D. - Preliminary (LDGS) PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by Martinez PUD A plat is needed Wednesday, April 30, 1997 May 26, 1997 The plans will be reviewed in more detail once they are submitted with the public street portion designed. Keep these things in mind with the design: • A public street needs to be 36 feet in width with detached sidewalks along both sides. The bike path can serve as the sidewalk on the east, where it parallels the roadway. • Access to the parking lot and the private drive need to be configured as driveway cuts. • The set back: for parking stalls from the travel way of the street will need to be met. See Table 5 of the street standards. • If a mid block cross pan is to be used in a public street it needs to be 12 foot in width. Access off of Sherwood needs to be designed with concrete to the property line. Provide a detail for this access. Provide details: Driveway cut detail; curb, gutter and sidewalk detail; additions to existing walk detail; detail for railroad crossing, handicap ramp details. Date: ��2/�/��'- Signature: 5• ��^ l April 9, 1997 tENGINEERING Project No: 1558-01-97 Sheri Wamhoff City of Fort Collins Engineering Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Martinez P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Sheri, This is a response to your review comments concerning the preliminary submittal for Martinez P.U.D. Comments are addressed according to each sheet of the original reviewed preliminary plan set and your written comments provided on your project comment sheet dated 03/21/97. This response will also address general discussion items which may not specifically associate to the plan comments. GENERAL ITEMS: This project is a part of the Old Town Master Drainage Plan which affects both this property and the Lee Martinez Park property. We are in the process of trying to get Janet Meisel with Parks and Recreation together with Stortwater so the effects of the Old Town Master Drainage Plan on all properties may be coordinated with all affected. We will keep you posted on meeting schedules so you may consider attending. * Attached are copies of response letters to Roger Buffington at Water / Wastewater and to the Stormwater Utility for your reference. * Please note on Steve Olt's comment letter dated March 18, 1997 that Janet McTague with Light and Power may like to have a utility coordination meeting. * We understand that all existing rights -of -way within the boundaries of the plat will need to be vacated. It appears from City records and title work that rights -of -way have already been vacated. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANS: * The westernmost access off of Sherwood has been widened. * Sherwood Street has dedicated right-of-way at the westernmost access. This has been verified with snapping. * Parking will be addressed by Mikal Stephen Torgerson of M Torgerson Architects as a planning issue. Utility Plans will be revised accordingly. • The private drive has been widened. The plan and the typical street section are consistent with one another. The street typical section can be found on the cover sheet. * The driveway width to the commercial parking area will be 28'. • The access point off of Cherry Street has been relocated to the west so that it lines up with the through lane movement on Mason Street. 4836 S. Collcgc, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-031 1 PAGE 2 April 9, 1997 Project No: 1558-01-97 Re: Martinez P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANS: * Both accesses will have concrete placed to the property line. Sidewalk already exists along Cherry Street adjacent to the project. The sidewalk has been field located and has been properly represented on all plans. * As mentioned, the sidewalk already exists along Cherry Street. Therefore, no additional detail has been provided for the sidewalk crossings of the railroad track. If you have further questions or comments, please call at 226-5334. Sincerely, Brian W. Shear, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation BWS / nib cc: James W. Leach; Wonderland Hill Development Company Mika] Stephen Torgerson; M Torgerson Architects PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: January 21, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #4-96 Martinez P.U.D. Preliminary PLANNER: Steve Olt (Yv"'� 17 All comments must be received by: Monday,Sebfuu�, 1997 Martinez PUD - Preliminary March 21, 1997 Plat • Show all lots, tracts, easements and right-of-ways. • All existing right -of -way within the boundaries of the plat will need to be vacated prior to the plat being filed. Site Plan • The head in parking provided on the site does not meet the City parking standards. Will vehicles be able to get out of these spots? • The western access point needs to be a min of 24 feet in width to accommodate two way traffic. Utility Plans • The western access point needs to be a min of 24 feet in width to accommodate two way traffic. For the western access point - is this area row need to provide proof, if it is not then an access and construction easement is needed. (Continued on next page) Date: 3 2i ��� Signature- CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ..PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ff' SITE _S'LANDSCAPE UTILITY Martinez PUD - Preliminary March 21, 1997 • The head in parking provided on the site does not meet the City parking standards. Will vehicles be able to get out of these spots? • The private drive does not correspond with the sections provided. Please indicate the width and the x-section configuration. • What is the driveway cut to the north of the commercial building? • The access point off of cherry street needs to be moved west so that it will line up with the through lane movement on Mason Street. • Both access shall have concrete provided to the property line (or at least on the cherry street entrance) • Sidewalk needs to be provided along Cherry street along the boundaries of the property. • Need to provide details for the driveways and the sidewalk crossings of the railroad tracks. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: January 21, 1997 DEPT: Engineering Pvmnt PROJECT: #4-96 Martinez P.U.D. Preliminary PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by: Monday, Qi'uar�1�0, 1997 A Final Soils Report and a Pavement Design Report will need to be submitted after underground work is completed and streets are rough cut. Date: Signature '�9" CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planninc DATE: 11 :7 / `S' DEPT• Engineering PROJECT: PLANNER: ENGINEER: No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Martinez PUD April 16, 1998 Sheet 5 on section AA label the slope as 1.0% minimum. Shcet 6 • We will allow the slope to 1.0%. I did receive the variance letter and a response letter will be put together. • Provide an inlet on the West side of the cross pan. We realize the volume of flows do not necessitate it, but it is to pick up these minor flows from rain, watering etc so that they do not flow across the cross pan. Yes water will go across this pan, but with the inlet we wilt not have the nuisance flows going across causing problems. And therefore all the curb and gutter on the west side should be inflow. • Per a meeting and conversation with Mark Sears the area around the railroad tracks should be asphalt not concrete as has been shown. Provide the concrete cross pan, but put in asphalt behind it. Apparently this wears better and makes it easier to access the ties if needed. • The City recognizes that the speeds will be slower on Mason court, but it will not have speed limit signs on it. Private speed limit signs can be placed along the private drive by the developer if desired thou h.� Continued on next f 1, ate: Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAN ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 2- PROJECT: A4r vicz DEPARTMENT: PLANNER: All comments must be received by: T e-sl yi ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 01-1LkTC WVZA Date: Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY 27 The work -live opportunity will be enhanced through the use of state -of the art wiring for electronic communication technology, including the potential for shared networking of computers as well as the sharing of other office equipment. 5. Landscaping for a Pedestrian Friendly Environment. Street trees will be provided along the private drive as well as in the private open spaces. Arbors and other entry features will be used at entry points into the CoHousing community. An attractive entry feature and plaza will be provided at the east entry point to the site where it connects to the downtown commercial area. 6. More Sustainable Lifestyle The Martinez PUD will offer and encourage a lifestyle that is much less auto -dependent due to the development's convenient location near both downtown shopping and service opportunities as well as near the recreation facilities offered by the adjacent park. The need for automobile use by residents will be significantly reduced, enabling some residents to live auto -free if they so desire. In addition, the CoHousing community will likely take a proactive position encouraging a more sustainable lifestyle for both its residents and others in the neighborhood. B. Ownership of Public and Private Open Space Areas The eastern portion of the PUD will be sold to the City of Fort Collins as an addition to Lee Martinez Park. Other open space areas as well as drives and parking will be owned and maintained by owners' associations. The drive through the PUD will be owned and maintained by a master association consisting of all properties within the PUD. It is anticipated that the open space and parking areas for the CoHousing community will be owned and maintained by that community's homeowners association. The open space areas on the single family lots will be maintained by private owners of those homes. The parking and plaza area surrounding the commercial building will be owned and maintained by the owners of that building with an agreement to share parking and maintenance of the parking with the City Parks Department. C. Employees At this time we would estimate that the commercial portion of the site will provide employment for between 10 and 20 employees who live off -site. In addition, there will be significant employment opportunities for many individuals living within the PUD. mmkohousmg/margwk.dm 01/15/97 3 D. Rationale for Choices made by Applicant The plan for the Martinez PUD has been based on significant neighborhood input in an effort to provide a development that is economically viable but also contributes the least negative impact to the surrounding Martinez Park residential neighborhood and has the greatest potential to positively influence the neighborhood and the City. E. Point Charts See enclosed Point Chart. F. Potential Conflicts between Land Uses Conflicts between residential and commercial land uses have been significantly mitigated by placing the commercial portion of the development to the east where it has easy access to the downtown area without driving through the residential portion of the site or the adjacent residential :Martinez Park neighborhood. G. Energy Conservation Wonderland Hill Development Company has a long-standing reputation for building exemplary energy conservation developments. See materials enclosed. Also see completed Energy Conservation Worksheet enclosed. Buildings in the project will be built to standards that wiill generate 3 points under Method Two of the City's Energy Point System. 5. DEVELOPMENT PHASING SCHEDULE The PUD is being; submitted as a one phase development. It is anticipated that construction will begin on the residential portions of this site soon after approvals are obtained by late 1997. The construction on the commercial portion will begin within 2 years of approval. All construction will be completed on the site within 3 years of approval of the PUD. mmkohousing/martpark.dx 01115/97 4 Martinez PUD (page 2 of 2) April 16, 1998 Sheet 8 • The same thing goes for the approach to the rails on Sherwood Street. Provide a 12 foot pan, but make the remaining 4 feet to the tracks asphalt. Sheet 1 I • Please label the 10 foot concrete slab as being a 10 foot exposed concrete slab. It was discussed ar. one of the meetings that it would be done in this way to make it not appear like a sidewalk. Sheet 19 • Show where the path is located in relation to the base of the retaining wall. Provide a minimum separation dimension. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Colflins Current Planning DATE: DEPT: Engineering PROJECT.. PLANNER: J r 0 ENGINEER: )1,� No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Martinez PUD March 2, 1998 Landscape Plan • No site plan was received, therefore comments may also apply to site plan • Show the rip rap areas - currently a tree is shown being planted in the middle of one of these areas. Will it survive there? • Remove the label for 10 foot sidewalk - we talked about it being an exposed aggregate area/pad, label as such. • Show the curb stops in the parking lot and label. • label retaining wall that is adjacent to the path. • see plans for additional comments. Plat • eliminate the word quitclaim in the railroad easement statement. • indicate the type of easement that was dedicated off site on the east - I believe that it was a utility easement. • provide a recorded copy of the drainage easement or license for the railroad for grading and drainage. (Continued on next page) Date: Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: 0 PLAT ©" SITE []'UTILITY ©/ LANDSCAPE Martinez PUD (page 2 of 2) March 2, 1998 Utility plans sheet 5 - street sections On Mason Court a minimum of 1 foot of approximately flat area is needed behind the curb to maintain stability. (On the north side where the park path serves as the sidewalk) see section N-N • Where Mason Court is not crowned a min 2.0% x-slope is still required (obviously this will not be the case at the railroad tracks, but will transition out) Both sides of the street shall have inflow curb and gutter. Sheet 6 - Mason Court plan and profile • Where Mason Court is not crowned a min 2.0% x-slope is still required. • Both sides of the street shall have inflow curb and gutter. Provide an inlet on the west side to capture minor flows and keep them from flowing across the x-pan. This will help to prevent icing problems in the winter. I understand that in large flow/storm conditions that this will not take the flow off of the street. That is why the x-pan is there, since it is intended to carry the overflow flows. • Still not achieving a .6% slope on the x-pan. With the rise in the inflow curb the center point is the low point. Calculation is from lip of gutter to lip of gutter. provide additional clarification as requested on the intersection ramps. The back of' sidewalk around the cul-de-sac should follow the row line. Sheet 8 - Sherwood Street Plan At the entrance drive on the south edge either bring the curb out to the edge of the sidewalk or provide triangular piece of concrete in this area. Since the whole area south of the drive has only '/2 inch curb this area will be driven over. Indicate where the access drive transitions from 20 feet to 24 feet. • Add to the asphalt patch note. Add the following: limits of patch overlay to be determined in the field by the City inspector. Sheet 9 - emergency and pedestrian access provide note indicating that the access is to be made of landscape stone or crushed gravel over base course. Sheet 11 - Mason Court and parking lot detail • Indicate where the transition from concrete to asphalt occurs in the street. • Provide a high point elevation on the cul-de-sac island and label the curb as outfall curb. January 30, 1998 Sheri Wamhoff City of Fort Collins Engineering Dept. 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 RE: Martinez P.U.D. Dear Sheri, This letter will summarize the responses and revisions to the Martinez P.U.D. Utility Plan Set and Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report, as a result of the recent City Departmental reviews. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET: The following section addresses the comments included on the Project Comment Sheet dated January 5, 1998: Plat (Sheet 1 of 2). I. The Plat (Sheet I of 2) has been revised and the attorney's certification has been replaced with the new certification provided. Platfheet 2 of 2 2. The Plat (Sheet 2 of 2) has been revised to change the "fire access" to an "emergency access" as requested. 3. The private drive (Tracts E and B) has been revised to "public access" as requested. 4. Negotiations with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad continue at this time. The license agreement associated with the waterline bore has been received, but required some revisions based on the City of Fort Collins Attorneys Office. The revisions have yet to be confirmed/received at the time of this response letter. The Public Utility Commission (P.U.C.) has granted approval of the "At Grade Road Crossing", the developer is now in negotiation with the B.N.S.F. to complete the agreement to construct the crossing. The developer is also in negotiation with the B.N.S.F. for a thirty-foot drainage and grading easement. A copy of all license agreements and easements will be provided, as they become available. 5. The surveyor is researching the quit claim deed for the portion of the property - where the railroad has quit claimed the land to the current owner to determine if additional easements or signatures are required. 6. Room for the Reception Numbers has been provided on the Plat (Sheet 2 of 2). 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 292-0311 Page 2 January 30, 1998 Project No. 1558-01-97 Re: Martinez P.U.D. Utility Plans: 1. Reference to the Sheet numbers on which the typical sections are represented is provided as requested. SHEET 6: I. Additional detail has been provided to clarify transitions in grades, street crown, and curb heights. The detail is located in the lower left hand corner of Sheet 6. 2_ Vertical curves have been placed adjacent to the railroad tracks to eliminate the grade change in the street profile. The new profiles also take into account the requested changes to the mid block valley pan. 3. A variance request will be applied for noncompliance with the centerline radius requirements for a local street. The design speed would have to be reduced to 15 mph to come into compliance with standards. Based on the short length of Mason Court, plus the fact that the road will be crossed by a railroad track and mid block valley pan, a design speed of 15 mph has been used. 4. A variance request will be applied for noncompliance with the vertical curve requirements for a 30-mph street. The design speed would have to be reduced to 19 mph to come into compliance with standards. As mentioned above a design speed of 15 mph has been used. 5. The valley pan has been revised to conform to the minimum depth of 13/4" and the minimum flowline slope of 0.6%. Refer to the detail provided in the lower left- hand corner of Sheet 6. SHEET 8: I. Additional details have been provided to clarify transitions in grades, street crown, and curb heights. 2. The details show the various transitions in curb heights and grades. 3. The portion of Sherwood Street being reconstructed is 75 feet on the longest side. The grades are extremely restricted to matching existing conditions in this short distance. The area of new pavement is in effect a pavement patch that transitions from the crown section at Sta. 2+82.50 to the pan at Sta. 2+32.5�. It is felt that the additional spot grades and detailing provided make the set of profiles unnecessary. 4. The valley pan has been revised to conform to the minimum depth of 1'/4" and the minimum flowline slope of 0.6%. Refer to the details provided on Sheet 8. SHEET 11: 1. The spot: grade has been adjusted near the center of the island the necessary 0.02 feet to match the specified cross slope of 2.00%. 2. The retaining walls are proposed to be concrete modular retaining walls, refer to the detail on Sheet 19. Page 3 January 30, 1998 Project No. 1558-01-97 Re: Martinez P.U.D. 3. Detailing of the ramp on the north of the Commercial building has been provided on Sheet 19. PLAN COMMENTS: SHEET 2: I. The 10-foot concrete surface located near the commercial building has been provided at the request of the Water and Wastewater Department. The pad is intended to provide a solid surface for the Water Department crew and equipment to work from, in the event of a future leak or problem with the waterline. The concrete surface could possibly confuse residents and pedestrians in the area, if it becomes a critical issue the area could be signed to discourage use of the surface as a sidewalk. SHEET 4: The sidewalk width has been corrected to match the other sheets in the plan set. SHEET 5: 1. The stations listed for Sherwood Street Section JA are not correct as noted. The asphaltic concrete section is in transition from the concrete valley pan to the tie in point of the existing street crown. The section is not actually a typical section in that it applies to only a short distance of Sherwood Street. As such it has been moved to Sheet 8, where it is applicable. The listing of stations and the reference to the street cross slope has been eliminated from the detail because the portion of work is in transition its entire length. Work north of Sta. 2+82.50 is limited to a trench patch over the waterline installation. The approximate limit of trench patch is shown graphically to clarify the limits of work. 2. The labeling of the "Emergency access", has been revised to eliminate the word "fire". The emergency access Section H-H has been moved to Sheet 9, where it is most applicable. 3. The labeling of street cross slopes has been expanded to show two significant figures after the decimal point. SHEET 6: 1. Two wheel stops have been added in the parking area as requested. 2. The flowline profiles have been revised to show the new vertical curves near the railroad tracks and the changes to the mid block valley pan. Additional detail has been provided to clarify transitions in grades, street crown, and curb heights. The detail is located in the lower left hand corner of Sheet 6. 3. The width of the driveways and adjoining streets has been added. 4. The requested change in the sidewalk radius near the roundabout is not changed as requested. Currently the back of the sidewalk coincides with the property line. it is felt that to alter the sidewalk from that alignment would needlessly push the sidewalk into the private property. The curve in the sidewalk is no more abrupt