HomeMy WebLinkAboutNORTH COLLEGEMARKET PLACE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2010-08-11STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
BHA Design Date: 3/30/2009
c/o David Kasprzak
1603 Oakridge Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE, IST
FILING, WETLANDS - FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning
Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: General
Number: 115 Created: 1/5/2009
[3/18/091 Add note on plans to remove entire length of fence along property line of ditch.
[2/3/09] On demolition plan add additional notes per redlines.
[1/5/09] All wire fencing along the perimeter of the property shall be removed. Show on
Demolition Plan.
Number: 122 Created: 2/4/2009
[3/18/09]
[2/4/09] Groundwater Report: Per Recommendation #4, page 21, the Development
Agreement shall include language that identifies maintenance responsibilities in regards to
the underdrain system.
Topic: Site/Landscape
Number: 121 Created: 2/4/2009
[3/18/09] Will be part of final submittal of approved plans.
[2/4/09] All plans of the Site/Landscape Plans pertaining to the wetlands are to be provided
as a separate bound exhibit that will be part of the wetland mitigation plan. This is required
to satisfy the language in the URA pertaining to the final wetland mitigation plan that is
approved by the Wetlands PDP.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 81 Created: 12/19/2008
[3/18/09] C-111 missed. .i
[2/3/09] Add signature block to the referenced sheets only.
[12/19/08] Add signature line to sheets C-002, QcVtl, C-012, C-111, C-141, C-142, C-171,
C-172, C-401, C-402 andC-451. 14,
Number: 118 Created: 2/3/2009
[3/18/09] This material contains polypropylene netting. Specify material that contains no
polypropylene materials.
[2/3/09] Provide MSDS for the fabric shown in the erosion control detail on C-502.
Page 1
Number: 122 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Groundwater Report: Per Recommendation #4, page 21, the Development Agreement
shall include language that identifies maintenance responsibilities in regards to the underdrain
system.
-Noted
Number: 123 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Groundwater Report: Per Recommendation #7, page 22, the Development Agreement
shall address the need for a monitoring well to assess the impacts of drawdown on the northern
wetland. This ties in to Comment #45.
-Noted
-Noted in text of the wetland mitigation plan
Topic: SitelLandscape
Number: 59 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] The trail details are considered a site/landscape detail, not a civil one. Provide on said
plans. The detail on C-173 is too generic.
[12/19/08] Provide trail details
-Details have been added to the site/landscape plans — sheet 15 of 15.
Number: 60 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] This detail is typically shown on the Site/Landscape Plans. Remove from sheet C-515.
A brief discussion will clarify your concerns.
[12/19/08] Add an open rail fence along the east side of the trail and provide details of the fence.
The fence will include wire mesh along the bottom half.
-Fence details have been added to the site/landscape plans — sheet 15 of 15.
Number: 68 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Correct. See comment #60. Can be resolved during Final Plan review.
[12/19/08] The fence that is adjacent to the trail will extend along the wetland boundary in the
buffer, in a location to be determined by the City's Environmental Planner. The fence shall be a
minimum of 4 feet high, of an open character, with wire mesh on the bottom half.
-Noted
Number: 69 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Can be resolved at Final Plan review at same time as comments #60 and 68.
[12/19/08] In the location of the retaining wall in the south wetland adjacent to the built
environment, the fence shall be a minimum of 6 feet high (similar to the fence along the Mason
Trail next to the rail road) with wire mesh the full height of the fence.
-6' ht. fence detail added to the site/landscape plans — sheet 15 of 15.
Page 2
r"
Number: 73 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Add note to grading plan that the final grading for the edges of the wetland will be
staked in the field by Steven Long (wetlands biologist) and the City of Fort Collins'
Environmental Planner.
[12/19/08] The new edge of the wetland adjacent to the retaining wall system is to have an
irregular edge, not a straight line. The irregular edge will allow trees and shrubs to form a deeper
transition into the wetland, and to eliminate the current "hedgerow" design.
-Note Added
Number: 80 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Add the following to the end of note #2:
As approved by the City of fort Collins' Environmental Planner.
[12/19/08] Upland and wetland plant material mixture shall be installed by a variety of methods -
drilling, plugs and broadcasting seed methods.
-Note Added
Number: 116 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Show edge Limit of construction line at edge of seeding or planting areas. See redlines.
-Approximate limit line shown on plans.
Number: 119 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Wetland buffer exhibit can be submitted as an 11 "x17" exhibit at time of final review
with final wetland buffers.
-`Natural Feature Buffer' area delineated on sheet 3 of 15.
Number: 121 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] All plans of the Site/Landscape Plans pertaining to the wetlands are to be provided as a
separate bound exhibit that will be part of the wetland mitigation plan. This is required to satisfy
the language in the URA pertaining to the final wetland mitigation plan that is approved by the
Wetlands PDP.
-Site/Landscape Plans are bound and folded as separate documents. Final approved plans
will be provided separately as an exhibit to the wetland mitigation plan.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 81 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Add signature block to the referenced sheets only.
[12/19/08] Add signature line to sheets C-002, C-011, C-012, C-111, C-141, C-142, C-171, C-
172, C-401, C-402 andC-451.
-Signature removed from sheets not listed above.
Number: 83 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Change wetlands buffer label to "Natural Feature Buffer."
[12/19/08] Add wetland buffers to plat with reference to buffer note.
-Adjusted
Number: 117 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Erosion control channel detail on C-501 is redundant with the detail on C-502, the
preferred material and method.
-Removed detail C-501
Page 3
s
Number: 118 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Provide MSDS for the fabric shown in the erosion control detail on C-502.
-Erosion control calculations and literature is provided in Appendix G of the drainage
report.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 13 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The response to this comment in the letter is fine. Please note that with the designation
of Tract A as a blanket temporary construction easement, no building or structure can be placed
within the tract. With Filing 2 presumably vacating the entire easement, this would then not be
of concern. Please also note that by designating this tract as a "temporary construction easement"
this easement is being dedicated to the City, which may or may not be intended.
[12/16/08] All areas that are to be disturbed with this first phase, whether grading, topsoil
removal, or stockpiling onto, should be part of a legally described tract or lot on the plat in order
to have this area be defined as part of the approved PDP and specify that this certain area applies
to the development agreement specific to the PDP.
-Adjusted to designate Tract A as a Private Easement
Number: 15 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The revised Tract table indicates that ownership and maintenance of Outlot B is to be
the City. I don't believe this should be specified on the plat as I don't believe ownership and
maintenance by the City is intended upon the recordation of the plat but at some point after. If it
is intended to assign to the City upon recordation then it should be verified that the appropriate
City signatures are obtained on the plat to properly assign this responsibility.
[12/16/08] With the development being commercial, it seems odd to have Tract A be specified
as being owned and maintained by an HOA.
-Adjusted to 1908 North College
Number: 20 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] Please ensure that proposed easements are shown within the development as well as
existing easements off -site, especially when off -site work is being proposed.
[12/16/08] Please ensure all drawings clearly label existing right-of-way, easements, etc.
-All off -site easements along with all proposed easements are shown and labeled on the
plans.
Number: 21 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The response indicates temporary patching with the City street work to include an
overlay and is indicated as such via Note No. 5 on the demo plan. Please have note No. 5
eliminated for now, pending verification on the overlay aspect. Note No. 4 should address the
patching situation for now.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#16 & 19, please specify street patching limits along Willox Lane for
any utility work to show how the existing Willox Lane pavement is affected.
-Note changed to reflect permanent patch. Since these comments were released,
conversations between my client and City staff revealed that the overlay will occur with the
College Avenue and Willox Lane Roadway Improvements Project.
Page 4
Number: 22 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The proposed driveway needs to be designed and built in accordance with our high
volume driveway detail. The proposed design is more of a public street design detail.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#21, might there be a benefit to have the driveway approach onto
Willox Lane be constructed at this time rather than potentially have to cut Willox Lane with the
potential completion of the road project?
-Driveway adjusted to reflect the high volume driveway detail and added 707.
Number: 25 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/4/09] Technical Services offers the following comments for round 2:
1. Boundary & legal close. —See attached closures
2. Line over text (scanning) issues on site, landscape & utility plans. -Text movement and
masking has been done for clarity.
3. Book & page recording date doesn't match between legal & plat. -Adjusted
4. Why is "Tract A" a temporary construction easement and when does it expire? -Renamed to
Private Easement
[12/16/08] Technical Services offers the following comments:
1. Boundary and legal close.
2. Reception number in legal does not match plat.
3. Reception number for 20' pedestrian access easement is missing (sheet 2).
4. Some easement info is missing and would be useful for locating easements.
5. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on the landscape plans.
6. Description of and who maintain outlots?
7. Does the ditch company need to sign the plat?
Number: 41 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Please add a signature block with name and P.E. registration of the person signing off
on the plans.
[12/19/081 LCUASS requires a consulting engineer's affirmation statement on the cover sheet.
-Signature block added.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 130 Created: 2/4/2009
PFA has no additional comments or concerns at this time.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 28 Created: 12/17/2008
[2/4/09] Locate 3-inch meter vault with a minimum of 4 feet of clearance from the building.
[12/17/08] Locate meter pits in landscaped areas whenever possible (see redlined plans). Is the
3-inch meter vault in a paved area? If so, add bollards to prevent traffic on the vault.
-Design changed from a 3" meter to a 2" meter and located 4' from edge of building.
Number: 31 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] As the plans currently show, it appears there is a conflict between the steel casing on the
sanitary sewer and the triple 1900 culverts. If this area is under revision, please provide new
drawings.
-Design has been adjusted and reflected in current submittal.
Page 5
[12/18/08] Sheets C-202 and C-301show different clearances between the sanitary sewer and
the three 24-inch storm lines. Which is correct? Is there any possible way to increase the
clearance? What is planned for protecting the sanitary?
-Design has been changed and the storm sewer now sits below the sanitary sewer.
Number: 32 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] PVC fittings NOT allowed; change to DIP. Revise labeling on WM sheets as shown on
redlined plans.
[12/18/08] Revise the labeling of water main fittings and connections to include all thrust blocks,
valves, fittings, curb stops, meter pits, etc.
-Adjusted
Number: 36 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] Add the lowering of the existing WM at Willox and Bristlecone to the lowering table.
Pothole existing mains and include elevations.
[ 12/18/08] On water detail sheet, include a table that lists the following information for each
water main lowering: Diameter of both pipes, elevation of the WM on each side of lowering,
elevation of lowered WM, invert elevation of the pipe being crossed.
-Watermains have been potholed and lowering added to the table.
Number: 37 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] When available, provide the design pumping rate to allow check of downstream
capacity.
[12/18/08] What is the designed pumping rate(s) of the lift station? This is needed to check
downstream sewer capacity.
-The design pumping rate of the lift station is 151 gpm per Romtec Utilities
Number: 124 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Re -align the sanitary sewer at Willox and Bristlecone to eliminate one of the water line
crossings (and potential lowerings).
-Adjusted
Number: 125 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Schedule meeting to discuss switching the water main and sanitary sewer locations
where the mains extend from Willox south of the King Soopers building. This would eliminate
some conflicts between the sewer and services/fire lines.
-Per our meeting on February 101h, the water main has been adjusted to sit above the storm
sewer while incorporating insulation to avoid freeze concerns. Swapping the waterline and
the sanitary sewer would result in an additional water lowering and create service conflicts.
To avoid this lowering, the waterline services near the King Sooper's will cross underneath
the sanitary sewer wrapped with EZ wrap.
Number: 126 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Provide the utility exhibit showing all wet and dry utilities.
-Provided
Page 6
Number: 127 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Add note to core drill opening into existing MH at Willox and Bristlecone, grout around
pipe and reshape invert.
-Added
Number: 128 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Revise the connection for the 3-inch water service to include an 8x8x4 tee, 4-inch valve
and a 4x3 reducer.
-3" meter is no longer included in the design.
Number: 129 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] The 1-inch irrigation service must be copper from water main through the meter pit.
-Noted on the drawings.
Number: 131 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Add the shallow MH detail and the 1-inch meter pit detail.
-Added
Number: 132 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Identify and label all water and sewer services that are to be abandoned. Include notes
directing contractor to coordinate abandonment with Water Utilities Field Operations department
(416-2165).
-Blow-up provided on demolition plan and note added
Number: 133 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] See red -lined utility plans for additional comments.
-Noted
The North College Marketplace, Wetlands PDP has been scheduled for an administrative public
hearing on Monday, February 23, 2009 at 281 North College Avenue. The hearing will begin
promptly at 5:30 p.m. in conference rooms A — C. The comments contained in this letter can be
addressed with your Final Compliance Plan submittal that is required after the PDP public
hearing. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you submit the Final Compliance Plans.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please
feel free to call me at 970-221-6341.
Yours Truly,
Steve Olt,
City's Project Planner
Page 7
cc: Marc Virata
Dana Leavitt
Loveland Commercial
BHA Design
AYRES Associates
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.
Current Planning file #39-08
-Per comment 25 above
Parcel name: BOUNDARY SUB lST
North: 1456701.8184 East : 3118692.0806
Line Course: N 00-41-23 E Length: 141.9709
North: 1456843.7791 East : 3118693.7897
Line Course: N 89-34-37 W Length: 235.0000
North: 1456845.5144 East : 3118458.7961
Line Course: N 00-41-23 E Length: 691.8707
North: 1457537.3350 East : 3118467.1250
Line Course: S 89-23-30 E Length: 548.7657
North: 1457531.5091 East: 3119015.8598
Line Course: N 45-25-43 W Length: 28.8103
North: 1457551.7282 East: 3118995.3360
Line Course: N 44-17-14 W Length: 332.2300
North: 1457789.5548 East : 3118763.3548
Line Course: N 89-23-30 W Length: 43.5000
North: 1457790.0166 East : 3118719.8572
Line Course: S 50-20-01 W Length: 297.5481
North: 1457600.0870 East: 3118490.8121
Line Course: N 89-23-30 W Length: 7.9300
North: 1457600.1712 East: 3118482.8826
Line Course: N 00-41-23 E Length: 44.5217
North: 1457644.6897 East : 3118483.4185
Line Course: S 62-41-23 W Length: 16.9886
North: 1457636.8952 East: 3118468.3236
Line Course: N 00-41-23 E Length: 23.2636
North: 1457660.1572 East: 3118468.6037
Line Course: N 51-28-20 E Length: 206.6659
North: 1457788.8884 East: 3118630.2795
Line Course: N 47-54-03 E Length: 101.8500
North: 1457857.1703 East : 3118705.8506
Line Course: N 55-52-37 E Length: 108.1700
North: 1457917.8508 East : 3118795.3974
Line Course: N 71-24-28 E Length: 111.6600
North: 1457953.4516 East : 3118901.2300
Line Course: S 88-09-20 E Length: 167.1400
North: 1457948.0723 East : 3119068.2834
Line Course: S 84-09-59 E Length: 103.5600
North: 1457937.5466 East: 3119171.3071
Line Course: S 69-59-36 E Length: 103.6800
North: 1457902.0748 East : 3l 19268.7304
Line Course: S 52-08-26 E Length: 161.5200
Page 8
North: 1457802.9459 East: 3119396.2536
Line Course: S 25-22-25 E Length: 86.0500
North: 1457725.1970 East: 3119433.1278
Line Course: S 11-53-51 E Length: 200.9500
North: 1457528.5638 East: 3119474.5562
Line Course: S 16-57-50 E Length: 50.0400
North: 1457480.7012 East : 3119489.1564
Line Course: S 27-50-58 E Length: 55.1100
North: 1457431.9742 East: 3119514.9011
Line Course: S 40-05-17 E Length: 66.0600
North: 1457381.4346 East: 3119557.4415
Line Course: S 51-09-51 E Length: 96.9700
North: 1457320.6257 East: 3119632.9760
Line Course: S 50-53-15 E Length: 102.9100
North: 1457255.7056 East : 3119712.8248
Line Course: S 46-38-51 E Length: 41.4143
North: 1457227.2754 East: 3119742.9390
Line Course: S 00-27-48 W Length: 533.0937
North: 1456694.1991 East: 3119738.6268
Line Course: N 89-34-58 W Length: 1046.5739
North: 1456701.8194 East: 3118692.0806
Perimeter: 5755.8175 Area: 1,232,502 sq. ft. 28.294 acres
Page 9
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
BHA Design Date: 2/9/2009
c/o David Kasprzak
1603 Oakridge Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your revisions re -submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE,
WETLANDS PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) - TYPE 1, and we offer the
following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: General
Number: 45 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] The findings on page twelve of the report are to be evaluated by Steven Long
(wetlands biologist) with recommendations to offset the potential impacts of any drawdown.
[12/19/08] The ground water study does not address the potential impacts as raised
previously. This report shall address any impacts to either wetland.
Number: 47 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Written documentation will be required as referenced in paragraph 3, page 21 of the
report. This can be addressed during the final review of the project.
[12/19/08] The under drain dewatering system will be taking groundwater and converting it
to surface water. Once the water is converted to surface water evapotranspiration occurs and
the issue of augmentations arises. As the under drain water will be draining into the
wetlands, which will be public property, provide information (dewatering plan) that the
evapotranspiration will not create a loss of legally established water rights. This is also part
of the requirements for the groundwater report.
Number: 115 Created: 1 /5/2009
[2/3/09] On demolition plan add additional notes per redlines.
[1/5/09] All wire fencing along the perimeter of the property shall be removed. Show on
Demolition Plan.
Number: 120 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] All comments and issues attributed to Dana Leavitt for this project can be addressed
during the Final Plan review. There are no outstanding issues to be addressed prior to the
Type 1 public hearing.
Number: 122 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Groundwater Report: Per Recommendation #4, page 21, the Development
Agreement shall include language that identifies maintenance responsibilities in regards to
the underdrain system.
Page 1
v
Number: 123 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Groundwater Report: Per Recommendation #7, page 22, the Development
Agreement shall address the need for a monitoring well to assess the impacts of drawdown
on the northern wetland. This ties in to Comment #45.
Topic: Site/Landscape
Number: 59 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] The trail details are considered a site/landscape detail, not a civil one. Provide on
said plans. The detail on C-173 is too generic.
[12/19/08] Provide trail details
Number: 60 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] This detail is typically shown on the Site/Landscape Plans. Remove from sheet C-
515. A brief discussion will clarify your concerns.
[12/19/08] Add an open rail fence along the east side of the trail and provide details of the
fence. The fence will include wire mesh along the bottom half.
Number: 68 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Correct. See comment 460. Can be resolved during Final Plan review.
[12/19/08] The fence that is adjacent to the trail will extend along the wetland boundary in
the buffer, in a location to be determined by the City's Environmental Planner. The fence
shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, of an open character, with wire mesh on the bottom half.
Number: 69 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Can be resolved at Final Plan review at same time as comments 460 and 68.
[12/19/08] In the location of the retaining wall in the south wetland adjacent to the built
environment, the fence shall be a minimum of 6 feet high (similar to the fence along the
Mason Trail next to the rail road) with wire mesh the full height of the fence.
Number: 73 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Add note to grading plan that the final grading for the edges of the wetland will be
staked in the field by Steven Long (wetlands biologist) and the City of Fort Collins'
Environmental Planner.
[12/19/08] The new edge of the wetland adjacent to the retaining wall system is to have an
irregular edge, not a straight line. The irregular edge will allow trees and shrubs to form a
deeper transition into the wetland, and to eliminate the current "hedgerow" design.
Number: 80 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Add the following to the end of note #2:
As approved by the City of fort Collins' Environmental Planner.
[12/19/08] Upland and wetland plant material mixture shall be installed by a variety of
methods -drilling, plugs and broadcasting seed methods.
Page 2
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 20 Created: 12/ 16/2008
[3/24/09] The plat shows several offsite easements (such as at Pobre Panchos and along
Grape Street). They don't seem to be needed specific to this phase of development, and if so,
should be removed from being shown on the plat. If they are required with the project
however, the signed off -site easements need to be in place prior to sign off on the drawings.
[2/3/09] Please ensure that proposed easements are shown within the development, as well
as existing easements off -sites, especially when offsite work is being proposed.
[12/16/08] Please ensure all drawings clearly label existing right-of-way, easements, etc.
Number: 21 Created: 12/16/2008
[3/24/09] The plans should add a note referencing the overlay to follow the patching as part
of the College/Willox improvements.
[2/3/09] The response indicates temporary patching with the City street work to include an
overlay and is indicated as such via Note No. 5 on the demo plan. Please have note No. 5
eliminated for now, pending verification on the overlay aspect. Note No. 4 should address
the patching situation for now.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#16 & 19, please specify street patching limits along Willox Lane
for any utility work to show how the existing Willox Lane pavement is affected.
Number: 25 Created: 12/ 16/2008
[3/25/09] Technical Services offers the following comments for this final plan review:
1. Boundary & legal close.
2. What is a private easement? It's not shown in the legend and the table on sheet 1 of the
plat shows tract A as a temp const easement.
3. Scanning issues on plat, site & landscape and utility plans.
4. Reception #'s for easements by sep document will need to be added.
[2/4/09] Technical Services offers the following comments for round 2:
1. Boundary & legal close.
2. Line over text (scanning) issues on site, landscape & utility plans.
3. Book & page recording date doesn't match between legal & plat.
4. Why is "Tract A" a temporary construction easement and when does it expire?
[12/16/08] Technical Services offers the following comments:
1. Boundary and legal close.
2. Reception number in legal does not match plat.
3. Reception number for 20' ped access easement is missing (sheet 2).
4. Some easement info is missing and would be useful for locating easements.
5. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on the landscape plans.
6. Description of and who maintain outlots?
7. Does the ditch company need to sign the plat?
Page 2
Number: 116 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Show edge Limit of construction line at edge of seeding or planting areas. See
redlines.
Number: 119 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Wetland buffer exhibit can be submitted as an 11 "x 17" exhibit at time of final
review with final wetland buffers.
Number: 121 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] All plans of the Site/Landscape Plans pertaining to the wetlands are to be provided
as a separate bound exhibit that will be part of the wetland mitigation plan. This is required
to satisfy the language in the URA pertaining to the final wetland mitigation plan that is
approved by the Wetlands PDP.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 81 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Add signature block to the referenced sheets only.
[12/19/08] Add signature line to sheets C-002, C-011, C-012, C-111, C-141, C-142, C-171,
C-172, C-401, C-402 andC-451.
Number: 83 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Change wetlands buffer label to "Natural Feature Buffer."
[12/19/08] Add wetland buffers to plat with reference to buffer note.
Number: 117 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Erosion control channel detail on C-501 is redundant with the detail on C-502, the
preferred material and method.
Number: 118 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] Provide MSDS for the fabric shown in the erosion control detail on C-502.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 13 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The response to this comment in the letter is fine. Please note that with the
designation of Tract A as a blanket temporary construction easement, no building or structure
can be placed within the tract. With Filing 2 presumably vacating the entire easement, this
would then not be of concern. Please also note that by designating this tract as a "temporary
construction easement" this easement is being dedicated to the City, which may or may not
be intended.
[12/16/08] All areas that are to be disturbed with this first phase, whether grading, topsoil
removal, or stockpiling onto, should be part of a legally described tract or lot on the plat in
order to have this area be defined as part of the approved PDP and specify that this certain
area applies to the development agreement specific to the PDP.
Page 3
Number: 15 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The revised Tract table indicates that ownership and maintenance of Outlot B is to
be the City. I don't believe this should be specified on the plat as I don't believe ownership
and maintenance by the City is intended upon the recordation of the plat but at some point
after. If it is intended to assign to the City upon recordation then it should be verified that the
appropriate City signatures are obtained on the plat to properly assign this responsibility.
[12/16/08] With the development being commercial, it seems odd to have Tract A be
specified as being owned and maintained by an HOA.
Number: 20 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] Please ensure that proposed easements are shown within the development as well as
existing easements off -site, especially when off -site work is being proposed.
[12/16/08] Please ensure all drawings clearly label existing right-of-way, easements, etc.
Number: 21 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The response indicates temporary patching with the City street work to include an
overlay and is indicated as such via Note No. 5 on the demo plan. Please have note No. 5
eliminated for now, pending verification on the overlay aspect. Note No. 4 should address
the patching situation for now.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#16 & 19, please specify street patching limits along Willox Lane
for any utility work to show how the existing Willox Lane pavement is affected.
Number: 22 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The proposed driveway needs to be designed and built in accordance with our high
volume driveway detail. The proposed design is more of a public street design detail.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#21, might there be a benefit to have the driveway approach onto
Willox Lane be constructed at this time rather than potentially have to cut Willox Lane with
the potential completion of the road project?
Number: 25 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/4/09] Technical Services offers the following comments for round 2:
1. Boundary & legal close.
2. Line over text (scanning) issues on site, landscape & utility plans.
3. Book & page recording date doesn't match between legal & plat.
4. Why is "Tract A" a temporary construction easement and when does it expire?
[12/16/08] Technical Services offers the following comments:
1. Boundary and legal close.
2. Reception number in legal does not match plat.
3. Reception number for 20' pedestrian access easement is missing (sheet 2).
4. Some easement info is missing and would be useful for locating easements.
5. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on the landscape plans.
6. Description of and who maintain outlots?
7. Does the ditch company need to sign the plat?
Page 4
Number: 41 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Please add a signature block with name and P.E. registration of the person signing
off on the plans.
[12/19/08] LCUASS requires a consulting engineer's affirmation statement on the cover
sheet.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 130 Created: 2/4/2009
PFA has no additional comments or concerns at this time.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 28 Created: 12/17/2008
[2/4/09] Locate 3-inch meter vault with a minimum of 4 feet of clearance from the building.
[12/17/08] Locate meter pits in landscaped areas whenever possible (see redlined plans). Is
the 3-inch meter vault in a paved area? If so, add bollards to prevent traffic on the vault.
Number: 31 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] As the plans currently show, it appears there is a conflict between the steel casing
on the sanitary sewer and the triple 19x30 culverts. If this area is under revision, please
provide new drawings.
[12/18/08] Sheets C-202 and C-301show different clearances between the sanitary sewer
and the three 24-inch storm lines. Which is correct? Is there any possible way to increase
the clearance? What is planned for protecting the sanitary?
Number: 32 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] PVC fittings NOT allowed; change to DIP. Revise labeling on WM sheets as
shown on redlined plans.
[12/18/08] Revise the labeling of water main fittings and connections to include all thrust
blocks, valves, fittings, curb stops, meter pits, etc.
Number: 36 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] Add the lowering of the existing WM at Willox and Bristlecone to the lowering
table. Pothole existing mains and include elevations.
[12/18/08] On water detail sheet, include a table that lists the following information for each
water main lowering: Diameter of both pipes, elevation of the WM on each side of lowering,
elevation of lowered WM, invert elevation of the pipe being crossed.
Number: 37 Created: 12/18/2008
[2/4/09] When available, provide the design pumping rate to allow check of downstream
capacity.
[12/18/08] What is the designed pumping rate(s) of the lift station? This is needed to check
downstream sewer capacity.
Page 5
Number: 124 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Re -align the sanitary sewer at Willox and Bristlecone to eliminate one of the water
line crossings (and potential lowerings).
Number: 125 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Schedule meeting to discuss switching the water main and sanitary sewer locations
where the mains extend from Willox south of the King Soopers building. This would
eliminate some conflicts between the sewer and services/fire lines.
Number: 126 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Provide the utility exhibit showing all wet and dry utilities.
Number: 127 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Add note to core drill opening into existing MH at Willox and Bristlecone, grout
around pipe and reshape invert.
Number: 128 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Revise the connection for the 3-inch water service to include an 8x8x4 tee, 4-inch
valve and a 40 reducer.
Number: 129 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] The 1-inch irrigation service must be copper from water main through the meter pit.
Number: 131 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Add the shallow MH detail and the 1-inch meter pit detail.
Number: 132 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] Identify and label all water and sewer services that are to be abandoned. Include
notes directing contractor to coordinate abandonment with Water Utilities Field Operations
department (416-2165).
Number: 133 Created: 2/4/2009
[2/4/09] See red -lined utility plans for additional comments.
The North College Marketplace, Wetlands PDP has been scheduled for an administrative
public hearing on Monday, February 23, 2009 at 281 North College Avenue. The hearing
will begin promptly at 5:30 p.m. in conference rooms A — C. The comments contained in
this letter can be addressed with your Final Compliance Plan submittal that is required after
the PDP public hearing. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you submit the Final
Compliance Plans.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at 970-221-6341.
Page 6
Yours Truly,
Steve Olt,
�kr
City's Project Planner
cc: Marc Virata
Dana Leavitt
Loveland Commercial
AYRES Associates
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.
Current Planning file #39-08
Page 7
Department: Engineering
Date: February 9, 2009
Project: NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE - WETLANDS PDP - TYPE
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
February 04, 2009
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 13 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The response to this comment in the letter is fine. Please note that with the
designation of Tract A as a blanket temporary construction easement, no building or
structure can be placed within the tract. With Filing 2 presumably vacating the entire
easement, this would then not be of concern. Please also note that by designating this tract
as a "temporary construction easement" this easement is being dedicated to the City, which
may or may not be intended.
[12/16/08] All areas that are to be disturbed with this first phase, whether grading, topsoil
removal, or stockpiling onto, should be part of a legally described tract or lot on the plat in
order to have this area be defined as part of the approved PDP and specify that this certain
area applies to the development agreement specfic to the PDP.
Number: 15 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The revised Tract table indicates that ownership and maintenance of Outlot B is to
be the City. I don't believe this should be specified on the plat as I don't believe ownership
and maintenance by the City is intended upon the recordation of the plat but at some point
after. If it is intended to assign to the City upon recordation then it should be verified that the
appropriate City signatures are obtained on the plat to properly assign this responsibility.
[12/16/08] With the development being commercial, it seems odd to have Tract A be
specified as being owned and maintained by an HOA.
Number: 20 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] Please ensure that proposed easements are shown withing the development as
well as existing easements offsites, especially when offsite work is being proposed.
[12/16/08] Please ensure all drawings clearly label existing right-of-way, easements, etc.
Signature / Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility --landscape
Page I
Number: 21 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The response indicates temporary patching with the City street work to include an
overlay and is indicated as such via Note No. 5 on the demo plan. Please have note No. 5
eliminated for now, pending verification on the overlay aspect. Note No. 4 should address
the patching situation for now.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#16 & 19, please specify street patching limits along Willox Lane for
any utility work to show how the existing Willox Lane pavement is affected.
Number: 22 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/3/09] The proposed driveway needs to be designed and built in accordance with our high
volume driveway detail. The proposed design is more of a public street design detail.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#21, might there be a benefit to have the driveway approach onto
Willox Lane be constructed at this time rather than potentially have to cut Willox Lane with
the potential completion of the road project?
Number: 25 Created: 12/16/2008
[2/4/09] Technical Services offers the following comments for round 2:
1. Boundary & legal close.
2. Line over text (scanning) issues on site, landscape & utility plans.
3. Book & page recording date doesn't match between legal & plat.
4. Why is "Tract A" a temporary construction easement and when does it expire?
[12/16/08] Technical Services offers the following comments:
1. Boundary and legal close.
2. Reception number in legal does not match plat.
3. Reception number for 20' ped access easement is missing (sheet 2).
4. Some easement info is missing and would be useful for locating easements.
5. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on the landscape plans.
6. Description of and who maintain outlots?
7. Does the ditch company need to sign the plat?
Number: 41 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Please add a signature block with name and P.E. registration of the person signing
off on the plans.
[12/19/08] LCUASS requires a consulting engineer's affirmation statement on the cover
sheet.
Page 2
9A
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
BHA Design Date: 12/19/2008
c/o David Kasprzak
1603 Oakridge Dr
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE -
WETLANDS PDP - TYPE 1, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning
Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: General
Number: 43 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08) Cut Off Wall— Provide information that addresses to the groundwater once it is
intercepted by the wall. Where does the water go? It either will be perched, thus raising the
water table at the wetlands, or it appears that water will migrate to the east end of the wall
and then towards the south wetland. What will be the impacts to the south wetland if the
water table is to rise from the elevation of 4971?-The cut off wall has been removed from
the plans. The water table elevation of the south wetland is controlled by the invert of
the outlet pipe (4971') located in the southeast corner of the wetland.
Number: 44 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The cut-off wall will be a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of any wetland. -
The cut off wall has been removed from the plans
Number: 45 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The groundwater study does not address the potential impacts as raised
previously. This report shall address any impacts to either wetland. - Potential impacts to
the wetlands are addressed in groundwater report.
Number: 46 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The groundwater report shall be prepared according to the requirements of
Section 5.6 — Subsurface Water Investigations of the Larimer County Urban Street Standards.
- The groundwater report conforms to the requirements of Section 5.6 — Subsurface
Water Investigations of the Larimer County Urban Street Standards.
Number: 47 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The under drain dewatering system will be taking groundwater and converting it
to surface water. Once the water is converted to surface water evapotranspiration occurs and
the issue of augmentations arises. As the under drain water will be draining into the
wetlands, which will be public property, provide information (dewatering plan) that the
evapotranspiration will not create a loss of legally established water rights. This is also part
of the requirements for the groundwater report. - Water rights issues and permitting are
addressed in the groundwater report.
Page 1
Number: 48 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The wetlands boundaries do not match on all plans; cross check all plan sets to
ensure boundary is consistent. -The boundaries have been cross checked and are
consistent throughout each plan set.
Number: 49
Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Use a consistent symbol for the wetland boundaries on all plans. -A consistent
linetype for the wetland boundary is shown on all plans.
Number: 50 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Staff questions the need for using retaining walls on all three sides of the south
wetland. A meeting is required to develop an appropriate solution that limits the retaining
walls to the west edge of the wetland where adjacent to the vehicle circulation area for the
King Soopers building. -The retaining walls have been removed from the detention pond
and now utilize of the existing eastern and southern bank. The western edge is graded
in at a 3:1 slope.
Number: 51 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] As part of the DA: Submit wetland and upland seed mix/type specifications from
the supplier to the City's environmental planner for approval prior to the installation. —The
wetland seed mix and type along with a note for environmental planner approval are
included in the drainage report under section 4.2
Topic: Site/Landscape
Number: 52 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Staff suggests combining the Site and landscape plan drawings into one set of
plans. Site and landscape are combined into one set of plans.
Number: 53 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Site Plan —add note to the Cover Sheet: "Refer to Section 3.4.1(E) for allowable
uses in a buffer zone." Note was added to the cover sheet.
Number: 54 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Consider adding an existing conditions plan to the set of drawings. On this plan,
identify all of the trees to be removed for the Wetlands PDP, the trees that will remain and be
protected and the wetlands labeled with size of each. Proposed trees to be removed based on
proposed grading disturbance are identified and assigned a mitigation factor. Additional
trees shall be removed if found to be Siberian Elm or Russian Olive and within the
developinent property but may not be indicated on the plan. Existing wetlands are identified
with sized noted.
Number: 55
Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Overall Site Plan:
Add established buffer line for all wetlands; Added and truncated at property line.
Page 2
Add north property line along the canal; Property line shown.
Show outlots and tracts on plan; Shown and labeled.
Remove grading information; Existing and proposed grading removed.
Remove subsurface infrastructure information; 1Zelnoved.
Label wetlands with total size and acres impacted; Labeled.
Label mitigated wetlands with acres created. Labeled.
Number: 56 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On all other plans, remove trees to be removed; match up with Demolition Plan
in Utility Plan drawings. Trees to be removed are not shown on the site/landscape plans.
Sonic existing trees are shown which may be removed once verified as Siberian Elm or
Russian Olive and fund to be within the property. Most of these trees are near the proposed
grail.
Number: 57 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add the "Limits -of -Development Line" (LOD), to the plans; cross check with the
plans in the Utility Plans. LOD lines added to the site/landscape plans and cross checked with
Utility plans.
Number: 58 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add tree protection line, same as LOD, around all trees to remain within the
limits of construction. Tree protection lines (LODs) added for trees to remain.
Number: 59 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Provide trail details -Trail details are provided on sheet C-173
Number: 60 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add an open rail fence along the east side of the trail and provide details of the
fence. The fence will include wire mesh along the bottom half. -Fencing and details are
provided on sheet C-515. This fence detail may not fit the characteristics desired.
Please provide feedback.
Number: 61 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Re -align trail at the approach to the bridge; no impact to the wetland will be
allowed; if a retaining wall is necessary, a 5 foot separation from the wetland is required. —
The trail has been re -aligned at a minimum of 10 feet off of the wetland boundary. A
simple boulder wall (1:1) may be required to maintain 5-foot of separation.
Number: 62 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The trail will be a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the wetland in all
locations. —The trail has been re -aligned at a minimum of 10 feet off of the wetland
boundary.
Number: 63 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Verify the location of the trail in relation to the existing trees along the property
line. Confirm the trees to be removed and protection of remaining trees with Tim Buchanan
Page 3
Number: 142 Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09] The erosion control plan seems to show erosion control measures (gutter
protection) that occurs within the College and Willox roadways, is this intended? Blocking
portions of the roadways would be problematic.
Number: 143 Created: 3/25/2009
[3/25/09] The site plan should reflect the same information on public infrastructure to be
built with this filing as shown on the construction drawings (the construction of a driveway
off of Willox and sidewalk fronting Outlot B).
Department: Light & Power
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 134
[3/16/09] No comments.
Issue Contact: Justin Fields
Created: 3/16/2009
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 144 Created: 3/27/2009
[3/27/09] More detail is needed for the detention pond outfall. It is unclear how the steel
plate will slide up and down if the plate is needed to be adjusted.
Number: 145
Created: 3/27/2009
[3/27/09] Fort Collins does not allow trash racks on storm sewer outfall due to safety
concerns. Please remove all details showing these trash racks.
Number: 146 Created: 3/27/2009
[3/27/09] Please add a manhole at the 22.5 degree bend along the pond outfall storm sewer.
Number: 147 Created: 3/27/2009
[3/27/09] Please provide .5% slope for all storm sewers where physically possible.
Number: 148 Created: 3/27/2009
[3/27/09] Please add erosion control escrow calculations in the drainage report. The
itemized costs should be multiplied by 1.5 to determine the escrow amount.
Number: 149 Created: 3/27/2009
[3/27/09] Please revise water quality ponds outlet pipes to 8 inches rather than 6 inches to
help avoid clogging. Also, please shorten length of piping as per staff review meeting.
Number: 150 Created: 3/30/2009
[3/30/09] Please widen drainage easements at the PLD locations from 10 feet to the width of
the PLD.
Page 3
and Dana Leavitt. Suggest afield visit to resolve this issue. Meld visit conducted (1-12-09)
and additional trees assigned mitigation factors. Sonic trees left in question along property
line (fence line). Sonic of these trees are shown on the plans as rcmaining but shall be
removed if identified as Siberian Firi or Russian Olive. Regardless crfthe species the trees
west of the trail along the property line were found to have not value and could be removed if
needed.
Number: 64 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] South edge of north wetland will not be impacted by any construction activities,
such as grading or the installation of the cut off wall. -No impacts will be incurred on the
northern wetland.
Number: 65 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The cut-off wall shall be a minimum distance of 10 feet from the edge of the
wetland. -After further analysis and underdrain modifications, the cutoff wall is no
longer necessary.
Number: 66 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Minimum allowable buffer distance adjacent to proposed parking and circulation
is 25 feet with an average buffer of 50 feet; buffer to include the mitigated wetland. Provide
calculations of the different buffer requirements on an exhibit for the next submittal.
Separate exhibit (12x 18") provided.
Number: 67 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Per Section 3.4.1(L) —Compatibility with Public Natural Areas or Conserved
Land, the proposed landscape plantings along the all wetland edges next to the built
environment, shall be 2-3 times denser than shown, creating a solid vegetative buffer.
1"ltc ti cl%i lfl < teas fOr shrubs and trees have been changed as requested bN this
coninient. Upland plantings have been increased as well.
Number: 68 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The fence that is adjacent to the trail will extend along the wetland boundary in
the buffer, in a location to be determined by the City's Environmental Planner. The fence
shall be a minimum of 4 feet high, of an open character, with wire mesh on the bottom half.
-Fencing and details are provided on sheet C-515. This fence detail may not fit the
characteristics desired. Please provide feedback.
Number: 69 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] In the location of the retaining wall in the south wetland adjacent to the built
environment, the fence shall be a minimum of 6 feet high (similar to the fence along the
Mason Trail next to the rail road) with wire mesh the full height of the fence. -The retaining
walls have been removed from the southern wetland. A sit -foot fence is shown and
labeled as 8' rounded posts on center with wire mesh. Please provide feedback should a
different detail be needed.
Page 4
Number: 70 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Sheet 18 shows planting along the canal embankment; if this property is deeded
to the canal company, provide documentation that the landscape area will be maintained by
developer or the business owners association, not the property owner or the city. A l l
proposed shrubs and trees are relocated xvithin the property.
Number: 71 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Per Section C-C, add a note to the Grading Plan, that the bottom of the mitigated
wetlands shall be an unevenly graded pond bottom. -Note added.
Number: 72 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The west retaining wall system is a potential area for a bio-swale to treat the
runoff from the roof of the king Soopers building and the surface of the paved areas between
the building and the wetlands. This runoff has to be treated for water quality before it drains
into the wetland. The size of the bio-swale can be discussed in the meeting on the overall
grading plan. -A bio-swale has been incorporated on the western edge of the detention
pond/ wetland basin for water quality measures previously treated by snout oil/water
debris separators. This swale is 1 foot in depth, will provide a 12 hour drain time and is
included in the wetland mitigation area.
Number: 73 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The new edge of the wetland adjacent to the retaining wall system is to have an
irregular edge, not a straight line. The irregular edge will allow trees and shrubs to form a
deeper transition into the wetland, and to eliminate the current "hedgerow" design. -The
western edge of the detention pond/wetland basin incorporates an irregular bank.
Number: 74 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The plant material along the cut bank of the canal shall be 2-3 times denser,
forming a solid slope of landscape plantings. This is needed so that the slope is stabilized
with plant material, eliminating the need for maintenance by the City. Plant material has
been revised to increase to approximately 2 times the density previously shown. The intent is
to reach 65% coverage (as discussed and changed from 80%) regarding comment #1 13.
Number: 75 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Plant material along the eastern edge of the south wetland can be minimized to
clumps of plantings and willow cuttings along the edge itself. As per discussions held �Oth
C"ity I>c��; rr�7r °i OII ! 2 ,22 0S, plant'W'S 04)11!' the C�ISICI_11 Cdt!C Oft I IC 5o>uth vv'Ctlaircl 11� Iy C 1N2CI-I
Irlil)ntli/ccl tco inciclde v� 111(m cuttings at ::In m cr:lll tipat. ink of 2.0 feet as prcsent:cd in the
duc1€11k2M \0'etlal�cl 1ili!!;0ion Plan li>r tlic North Collq�c Vlarkctpl<ice Projcct (Ecctl ild
lilt T'ItIon
Number: 76 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Provide tree mitigation requirements and types of trees that meet the standards of
the Land Use Code. Tree mitigation factors are noted in table format on the existing
conditions plan. A tree mitigation planting list is provided oil Sheet 15 of 15.
Page 5
Number: 77 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] All plant material (excluding willow cuttings and seed material) shall be
increased in size to the next size in the nursery industry. 1 he text in SLii)seetions >. y.8 Anc1
leas becn chmlz,, d it) I-equil-e the Use of lart"Cr si/c sl7rr:h Mid twc stc>ck \� lien:
Con;111Crcirlll% av3ilablc.
Number: 78 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add text to the plant lists for the wetland mitigation plant list and the type of root
system. Additional information added.
Number: 79 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add sources of various plant materials, including willow cuttings and seed mixes
to the plant lists, as noted from the wetland mitigation plan. l'otenti:d sot:n-ces of V,11-ions JAIIIi
ln,ilcnals �%ill he added to the do>CUMCnts FC(11111-ed to hC snhn)itted to tl'ie 'HIC hOtezltiai
s0tA3-Cc list lllati Aso he t<rt lld ill the we°timid nliti,,_,�ctioll plall s1,ahnji11Cd tcU 1111S hr01cca. HIC
soun.,cs selccled 1i01- sc°e{1, s11111l-s, \t illoW c:csltili,},s. ,u d trcc phuiting stock cannot be identified
until tilt colltractoi. is seICC101 tuad 11, uitticT CMItrdCt. AVhcn the i,flantirrt�f contr,ic,tor
has hCell 'Clectcd and ih undel' CO]Itl_r11.t, the C0 JI1I_dCt0r Well be if-istI-LI ted to StIhnjit thc., fin,.rl
soclrcca to IIIc ('k%,,, L �2e ir��rrn�Cnt,.tI N"11111er 161- �c�vic«. Tl�iS retluirCIPCH i, also nolcd in the
WC11,111d naiti1;ati0n 1)1,111 1.111der SuhsCclicul 7. 3,9.
Number: 80 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Upland and wetland plant material mixture shall be installed by a variety of
methods -drilling, plugs and broadcasting seed methods. Note added to the plant list on sheet
15 of 15.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 81 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add signature line to sheets C-002, C-011, C-012, C-111, C-141, C-142, C-171,
C-172, C-401, C-402 andC-451.-Signature line added
Number: 82
Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add note to the Plat: "Refer to Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Use Code for
allowable uses within a buffer zone." -Note Added
Number: 83 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add wetland buffers to plat with reference to buffer note. -Buffers and note
added. Plans were printed after a request from the City instructed to have the buffer
truncated on the property line. The revised (trimmed) buffer line is shown on the
Overall. Site Plan.
Number: 84 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Note on plat stating that the northerly boundary of Out Lot B is coincident with
the delineated wetland boundary is not entirely correct at this time. Either the boundary
Page 6
follows the wetland boundary in its entirety or the note is removed from the plat. -Note is
adjusted
Number: 85 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Note of plat stating that the northerly boundary of Out Lot B is coincident with
the delineated wetland boundary is not entirely correct at this time. Either the boundary
follows the wetland boundary in its entirety or the note is removed from the plat.: Note is
adjusted
Number: 86 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Out Lot B shall not contain retaining walls. The western boundary line of Out
Lot B shall be to the east of any retaining wall. -The retaining walls have been removed
from the design.
Number: 87 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] As there will not be any retaining wall along the east boundary of Out Lot B,
there is no need for Out Lot C.-Due to previous discussions with the eastern property
owner, Outlot C will be deeded to that individual.
Number: 88 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add tree protection notes to Sheet C-002. Refer to the demolition and landscape
plans for the tree protection details. Change note #5 of the Standard Grading and Erosion
and Sediment control construction plan Notes so that there is no conflict with the tree
protection notes. The tree protection notes supersede this note. -Tree protection notes have
been added.
Number: 89 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add note to C-002, "Refer to Section 3.4.1(E) of the Land Use Code for
allowable uses within a buffer zone." -Note Added
Number: 90 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On Sheet C-002, add notes for the specifications on stockpiling of the wetland
soils. -Note Added
Number: 91 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On Sheet C-004 the 30" vertical RCP is actually 24". Add elevations for top of
RCP and invert and top and bottom of any openings in the pipe. -Note adjusted on Sheet C-
004 and elevations added to sheet C-011.
Number: 92 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On Sheet C-004, show where the RCP drains to. Use the attached information
(on the redline plan) to resolve. -Drain pipe has been included to the existing conditions
with note describing outfall location.
Page 7
Number: 93 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On Sheet C-011, add recommendations of wetland mitigation plan to the notes
per note #3. This information is critical for the contractors to have during the construction
process. -Per follow up discussions with Dana Leavitt, a more detailed note has been
added for compliance with the wetland mitigation report. ;-k text box %i ill he added to all
pertinent dralving, sheets that l.) a wetland mitigation plan has been prepared for this
project. 2.) each contractor involved in wetland emistruction and planting mast obtain
one copy of this docunient, and., 3.) each contractor must read and dennonstratc
hilmllerlr e of the plan helore site «ork can coninienee.
Number: 94 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On Sheet C-011, add a note that all Russian Olive trees within the limits of
construction shall be removed, including the stump and root ball mass.
Show the trees to remain with the correct canopy size and the location of the LOD around the
root system. -Note added and trees labeled with LOD.
Number: 95 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add the LOD to the Demolition Plan.-LOD added per redlines.
Number: 96 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] In the legend for the Demolition Plan, complete the tree and stump text with "to
be removed." -Legend has been adjusted.
Number: 97 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Show the 24" RCP on the Demolition Plan, and whether it is remaining in place,
abandoned or removed. -The drain pipe has been added to the existing conditions and a
note included to abandon in place.
Number: 98 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Identify wetland soil stockpile locations on the Demolition Plan with reference to
notes on stockpiling specifications on C-002.-Stockpile locations and references have been
added.
Number: 99 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On the Demolition Plan, show the edge of pavement for Grape Street and any
portion of the street to be removed. -The edge of pavement has been included however
improvements to Grape Street will be done with the 2"d Filing.
Number: 100 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On C-111, Overall Plan, see redline comments for changes to the drawing.
Provide the location of the scourstops from the Erosion Control Plan to BHA for inclusion on
the Site/Landscape Plans. -Changes have been made according to redline plans and the
scourstop locations have been adjusted and provided to BHA.
Page 8
Number: 101 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The north most scourstop location on the plans does not reflect the direction of
flow from the flow of the outlet pipe. Adjust to reflect the actual flow..-Scourstop locations
have been adjusted
Number: 102 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On the Erosion Control Plan, the wetland soil location is not delineated, just
labeled. There is a conflict with other sheets in the set of plans on the location of this
stockpile. Change plans to reflect actual location of the stockpile.. -Stockpile locations and
references have been added.
Number: 103 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add the LOD and the tree protection lines to the Erosion Control Plan. -Added
Number: 104 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On the Grading and Site Plan, resolve the inconsistencies of the wetland stockpile
location..-Scourstop locations have been clarified.
Number: 105 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Add the LOD and the tree protection lines to the Grading and Site Plan.. -Added
Number: 106 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] As shown on the Grading and Site Plan, the grading around the very large
cottonwood tree next to the canal will have an extreme impact on the root system of the tree. -
The grading has been adjusted to within 20 feet from the trunk of the tree. BHA has
discussed this approach with the City Forester during a site visit. Additionally, it was
discussed in the field that the roots are most likely seeking water to the east from the
ditch.
Number: 107 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Demonstrate that the design of Stormwater Line A will not adversely impact the
wetlands as it drains the stormwater from the site. -See drainage report section 3.31 sub
title "Detention/Wetlands Pond" for further discussion.
Number: 108 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On the Underdrain Plan, add a detail for the flapgate and information on its
operation. -A flapgate detail has been added.
Number: 109 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] What is the flow rate of the underdrain system as it goes into the wetlands? -The
flow rate varies depending upon whether or not the north wetlands are irrigated. The
maximum estimated flow rate with wetland irrigation is 21 gpm. The flow estimate
includes a factor of safety equal to 1.5.
Number: 110 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Provide information on the water quality of the underdrain system. -Water
quality sample test results are included with groundwater report.
Page 9
Number: 111 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] In the Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Section 5 — Weed control, add that a member of
the City's Natural Areas program will be included on the site visits. "IIC rcrlclirerlierlt tor° a
C"it% N IILIrttl At-cas I'rol;ra111 represcntatIve to 17c iIIcli.icicd orl ti�"Cca site E isits has bcci7
illeludeed i!1 Section 5.04)1`thc «'ctland ]lilt i ti«rr Ilan.
Number: 112 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] On page 18 of the wetland mitigation plan, the total ground cover shall be 80
percent on average. Tlie ground ct}vcr succes cl-itcrion Ul Section 8.0 t fll)c �ctlar1d
i tiii, atiou Ilan has been wvised ul)ward fivill 70 to 8() I3crccnt.
Number: 113 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] Upland conditions shall be part of the monitoring program of the wetlands
mitigation plan, with the same percentages of cover as stated for the wetland areas. Sect itan
,0) ot'tllc «vetlanci rniti,_,�Itloll clan ha, been 111odrtied to 111clude Mlrtual 111011itorinsr (411l .
co?Il,trLIctccl uplan(l, adjacent to the o�ctlarrd, k� ill' a col -cr success criteria of65 I)ercellt as
a;�recd to at the n7c0111" held oil I7ecCI1)bcr 22. The c()list ructed bio--,Neale area arid the
1���relaav features hm'e also been included in the InonitoI-in protocols.
Number: 114 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The wetlands mitigation plan cites the use of polypropylene erosion control
matting. The Natural Areas program requires cotton netting or no netting at all. : \ I l
rc:Ierences t�7 pi�l�%pr«pti ler�c nctti�� ha�e been removed fi-oiii the text ot`thc wolarid
r �iti� <.�ti<��1 h1��n. phi, iilcltxde4sl7ecif°ie�111�, Sub1,ccti0I ,. .6 4the text and
Sc.2bscoAI()r2, 1.0, 1.7. aiid 20 ot'Appcntlix
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 10 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The demolition plan in the construction drawing set should more clearly define
the area(s) to be disturbed specific to this wetlands PDP. The plan seems to show that trees
are to be removed throughout the entire site, though I believe this should only occur within
the wetland area. Also the area in which stockpiling of the salvaged topsoil is to occur
should be delineated: Demolition for the 1" Filing encompasses the wetland area in
addition to areas where unsuitable material is located. The disturbace performed with
this phase of construction is indicated by the "Limits of Construction" line.
Number: 11 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] With Stormwater's comments 3 and 5 regarding ownership and necessity of the
south wall, please note that if the end result is that the wall along Willox Lane is to be
privately owned and maintained, then right-of-way would need to be vacated.. -The
retaining walls have been removed from the design therefore the ROW can remain as it
currently does.
Page 10
Number: 12 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Please look to have the underdrain that is shown within the easement behind the
Willox Lane right-of-way, relocated to be outside of this utility easement corridor. Can this
underdrain be moved north of storm lines C & H?-Due to the invert of the bio-Swale,
adequate cover cannot be achieved over the underdain by moving north of storm line C
and H. It is proposed that a 5 foot utility easement be dedicated off of the existing
ROW line with placement of the underdrain just outside of this easement.
Number: 13 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] All areas that are to be disturbed with this first phase, whether grading, topsoil
removal, or stockpiling onto, should be part of a legally described tract or lot on the plat in
order to have this area be defined as part of the approved PDP and specify that this certain
area applies to the development agreement specific to the PDP.-Disturbance with the first
filing includes Outlot A, Outlot B, Outlot C, and Tract A. Previously Tract A was
designated as "Future Development". This has been changed to a temporary
construction easemtent.
Number: 14 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] It would appear that Larimer and Weld Canal would need to sign off on the plat. -
A signature line has been added.
Number: 15 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] With the development being commercial, it seems odd to have Tract A be
specified as being owned and maintained by an HOA.- Changed HOA to 1908 North College,
LLC
Number: 16 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] With the proposed drawings showing water, sewer and some storm facilities
being installed, light and power expressed potential concerns with these utilities being
installed at this time. A utility coordination meeting was suggested to discuss this concept.
can facilitate coordinating this meeting if desired. -A utility coordination meeting has been
scheduled for Jan 218t. Developments from that meeting will be incorporated into the
next submittal.
Number: 19 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The various drawings should be showing the existing conditions (such as existing
College and Willox) more prominently than the proposed future improvements to show how
everything ties in with existing conditions. -Noted and adjusted
Number: 20 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Please ensure all drawings clearly label existing right-of-way, easements, etc. -
Additional labels have been included.
Number: 21
Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Related to I13#16 & 19, please specify street patching limits along Willox Lane
for any utility work to show how the existing Willox Lane pavement is affected. -Utility
patch along Willox Lane has been included.
Page 11
Number: 22 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Related to I13#21, might there be a benefit to have the driveway approach onto
Willox Lane be constructed at this time rather than potentially have to cut Willox Lane with
the potential completion of the road project? -Concur, the drive approach is included in
this first phase of construction.
Number: 25 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Technical Services offers the following comments:
1. Boundary and legal close. OK
2. Reception number in legal does not match plat. Legal is correct, revised plat to reflect Rec
No
3. Reception number for 20' ped access easement is missing (sheet 2). Not yet Recorded
4. Some easement info is missing and would be useful for locating easements. Added
dimensions
5. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on the landscape plans. Corrected.
6. Description of and who maintain outlots? Added Outlot Descripiton and Oner &
Maintained By
7. Does the ditch company need to sign the plat? -Added John Andrew from the Larimer and
Weld Irrigation Company
Number: 26 Created: 12/17/2008
[12/17/08] It appears various stormwater pipes are being installed with this PDP that pertain
to the future bioswale behind Willox. How will these be graded in the interim? Is there a
need to have this constructed at this time? -It is the intent to construct as much of the
utility infrastructure around the King Sooper's building to facilitate a pad ready site
once surcharging is complete. The King Sooper's store will have an exposed back
foundation, with a finished floor elevation several feet higher than surrounding £wished
ground. A level pad is needed for loading the site, therefore the storm sewer will be
placed, capped and backfilled to phase I grade during this first phase. A 7 foot high
retaining wall is required on the north side of the bio-swale behind Willox Lane. The
retaining wall and bio-swale grading will occur in phase 2 once the pad has been loaded
to prevent failure of the wall.
Number: 41 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] LCUASS requires a consulting engineer's affirmation statement on the cover
sheet. -Added
Number: 42 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The naming of documents will need to be consistent among the various drawings
and should also take into mind the next PDP submittal. Ideally, this PDP submittal should be
titled "North College Marketplace" with the second PDP for the building titled "North
College Marketplace 2nd Filing". Another option would be to title this "North College
Marketplace 1 st Filing Wetlands" and the building be titled "North College Marketplace 2nd
Filing" ("King Soopers" can be appended to this title or some other identifier if desired.) -The
ls` phase will be titled "North College Marketplace" and the 2"d phase will be titled
"North College Marketplace 2"d Filing"
Page 12
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Janet McTague
Topic: General
Number: 2 Created: 12/9/2008
[12/9/08] No comments - there will be no effect on electric facilities
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 17 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] PLAT: Depending on the location and configurement of the future structures
(affecting emergency access) and whether or not they have automatic fire sprinklers, PFA
might require Emergency Access Easements be dedicated on any eventual replat. This could
not be part of a blanket easement. -Noted
Number: 18 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] FUTURE COMMENTS: PFA will comment on the proposed structures during
the ODP/Phase 2 PDP submittal process. -Noted
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 3 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The tract of land that the City will own cannot include the retaining walls at any
location. The wall will not be maintained by the City. Please revise the Tract which the City
will own to only include the wetland. The boundary should be just inside the retaining wall.
-The retaining walls have been removed from the design and Outlot B has been
adjusted to not include the bio-swale located in the detetion pond.
Number: 4 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The City Stormwater department feels that the east retaining wall is not needed.
The existing slope on the east side of the wetland is acceptable to leave in its current
condition.. -The retaining walls have been removed from the detention pond and now
utilize of the existing eastern and southern bank. The western edge is graded in at a 3:1
slope.
Number: 5 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The City Stormwater department feels the south retaining wall is not needed as
well. The plans appear to show there is enough distance for a 4:1 slope. Removing these
retaining walls will provide a more sustainable design.. -The retaining walls have been
removed from the detention pond and now utilize of the existing eastern and southern
bank. The western edge is graded in at a 3:1 slope.
Number: 6 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The proposed outfall storm sewer from the wetland needs to be in a 20 foot
drainage easement with the pipe centered within.
Also, locating the storm sewer in the street seems to be a more convenient location for
constructability and maintenance. The City would recommend the pipe be in Blue Spruce
Page 13
Number: 151 Created: 3/30/2009
[3/30/09] Please label pond emergency spillway and specify crest elevation on the grading
and drainage plans.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 127 Created: 2/4/2009
[3/24/09] The proposed invert IN is lower than the existing invert OUT. (???)
[2/4/09] Add note to core drill opening into existing MH at Willox and Bristlecone, grout
around pipe and reshape invert.
Number: 136 Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09] Underdrain must be below sanitary sewer as shown in the detail on Sheet C-517 or
be in a separate trench a minimum of 10 feet from water or sewer lines.
Number: 137
Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09] Add a specification and detail for the water main insulation. Also, include
insulation between the water main and the triple storm lines.
Number: 138 Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09] Show and label the steel casings on all water or sanitary sewer lines that pass
below storm lines 24-inch or larger. Include diameter and thickness of casing. Two
locations were noted: Willox & Bristlecone and east of King Soopers building.
Number: 139 Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09] Add a fire hydrant at the west end of the existing water main on Grape where the
dead end was created.
Number: 140 Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09] Remove the note for the locking valve box lid on the fire line for King Soopers.
This is the City's control valve.
Number: 141 Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09] See red -lined plans for other comments.
The applicant can work with the various departments individually to respond to and address
these comments. Mylars can be accepted by the City when all departments indicate that their
comments/concerns are addressed.
Page 4
Drive. -The outfall is included in a 20 foot drainage easement. Due to conflicts with
existing storm and sanitary sewer within Blue Spruce and Willox Lane, alignment
within the ROW is not feasible; however discussions are on -going about other
alternatives.
Number: 7 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] For the marketplace PDP, the drainage for the east part of the site that is draining
into the proposed snouts needs to be treated for water quality. The snouts can not solely be
used for the water quality treatment requirement. This concern needs to be worked out for
the wetland PDP due to the effect it has on the storm sewers and retaining wall locations. .-A
bio-swale has been incorporated on the western edge of the detention pond/ wetland
basin for water quality measures previously treated by snout oil/water debris
separators. This swale is 1 foot in depth, will provide a 12 hour drain time and is
included in the wetland mitigation area.
Number: 8 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The proposed scourstop needs to be designed per manufacturer's
recommendations. The City would like to see the manufacturer design these and provide the
design in the drainage report -Concur; will provide the manufacturer's recommendations
in fmal design.
Number: 9 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] How was the elevation of the detention outlet structure orifice plate determined?
This elevation and outlet design needs to be coordinated and agreed upon. -The outlet
structure includeds an 18" RCP at the invert of pond (elevation 4971) with a bolted
plate restricting flows to .2 cfs per acre or 4.98 cfs. At this release, the pond will drain to a
depth of 2 inches in approximately 40 hours during the 10-year storm event and 54 hours
during the 100-year storm event If monitoring of the wetlands reveal a flooded or drying
condition, the plate attached to the outlet can be adjusted to release more or less flow.
Further details will be worked out in final design.
Number: 30 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] The Stormwater Department is OK with the north slope along the south wetland
to be constructed with a 3:1 slope due to the extensive landscaping, which will eliminate
mowing. Our normal standard slope maximum is 4:1, so please include a variance request in
the drainage report for documentation purposes. -A letter will be submitted requesting this
variance.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffmgton
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 23 Created: 12/17/2008
[12/17/08] Locate underdrain a minimum of 10 feet from the water main. -Adjusted
Number: 24 Created: 12/17/2008
[12/17/08] Clearly label the lift station as private. -Labeled
Number: 27
Created: 12/17/2008
Page 14
[12/17/08] Label size of all water services. -Labeled
Number: 28 Created: 12/17/2008
[12/17/08] Locate meter pits in landscaped areas whenever possible (see redlined plans). Is
the 3-inch meter vault in a paved area? If so, add bollards to prevent traffic on the vault. -
Noted. The 3" meter has been moved to the south face of the building
Number: 31 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] Shts C-202 and C-301show different clearances between the sanitary sewer and
the three 24-inch storm lines. Which is correct? Is there any possible way to increase the
clearance? What is planned for protecting the sanitary? -This conflict has been adjusted to
include 3 19"00" elliptical storm pipes placed directly over the steel casing of the
sanitary sewer.
Number: 32 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] Revise the labeling of water main fittings and connections to include all thrust
blocks, valves, fittings, curb stops, meter pits, etc. -Adjusted
Number: 33 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] Include steel casings on water or sanitary sewer lines when crossing below storm
lines that are 24-inch or larger. -Included
Number: 34 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] Add bollards to protect the fire hydrant behind King Soopers. Add a bollard
detail to the water detail sheet. -Included
Number: 35 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] Show/label curb stop and meter piton irrigation service behind King Soopers.
Locate in landscaped area. Is this intended to serve the entire site? -Labeled
Number: 36 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] On water detail sheet, include a table that lists the following information for each
water main lowering: Diameter of both pipes, elevation of the WM on each side of lowering,
elevation of lowered WM, invert elevation of the pipe being crossed. -Included.
Number: 37 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] What is the designed pumping rate(s) of the lift station? This is needed to check
downstream sewer capacity.-150 gpm is assumed as a peak flow exiting the building at
this point until fixture counts can be completed.
Number: 38 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] On water detail sheets, add the tracer wire details for the PVC WM. (Std Details
25 and 30).-Detail added.
Number: 39
Created: 12/18/2008
Page 15
[12/18/08] Is there a WM raising on the project? ( A detail is included on Sht C-511.)-This
detail has been removed.
Number: 40 Created: 12/18/2008
[12/18/08] See redlined utility plans for other comments. -Noted
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: zoning
Number: 1
[12/5/08] No comments
Created: 12/5/2008
This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time.
Red -lined plans from City departments are included with this comment letter. Additional
comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. At the staff review meeting on December
17`h it was determined that another round of staff review really is necessary This proposal is
subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment
letter, being December 19, 2008) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code.
The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached REVISION
ROUTING SHEET. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
Yours Truly,
Steve Olt
City's Project Planner
cc: Marc Virata
Dana Leavitt
Loveland Commercial
BHA Design
AYRES Associates
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.
Current Planning file #39-08
Page 16
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: December 19, 2008
Project: NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE - WETLANDS PDP - TYPE I
Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 10 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The demolition plan in the construction drawing set should more clearly define
the area(s) to be disturbed specific to this wetlands PDP. The plan seems to show that
trees are to be removed throughout the entire site, though I believe this should only occur
within the wetland area. Also the area in which stockpiling of the salvaged topsoil is to occur
should be delineated.
Number: 11 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] With Stormwater's comments 3 and 5 regarding ownership and necessity of the
south wall, please note that if the end result is that the wall along Willox Lane is to be
privately owned and maintained, then right-of-way would need to be vacated.
Number: 12 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Please look to have the underdrain that is shown within the easement behind the
Willox Lane right-of-way, relocated to be outside of this utility easement corridor. Can this
underdrain be moved north of storm lines C & H?
Number: 13 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] All areas that are to be disturbed with this first phase, whether grading, topsoil
removal, or stockpiling onto, should be part of a legally described tract or lot on the plat in
order to have this area be defined as part of the approved PDP and specify that this certain
area applies to the development agreement specific to the PDP.
Number: 14 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] It would appear that Larimer and Weld Canal would need to sign off on the plat.
Number: 15 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] With the development being commercial, it seems odd to have Tract A be
specified as being owned and maintained by an HOA.
Number: 16 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] With the proposed drawings showing water, sewer and some storm facilities
being installed, light and power expressed tential concerns with these utilities bein
Signature Date
,,,XHECK HERPFYOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
lat Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility Redline Utility ftandscape
Page 1
installed at this time. A utility coordination meeting was suggested to discuss this concept. I
can facilitate coordinating this meeting if desired.
Number: 19 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] The various drawings should be showing the existing conditions (such as
existing College and Willox) more prominently than the proposed future improvements to
show how everything ties in with existing conditions.
Number: 20 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Please ensure all drawings clearly label existing right-of-way, easements, etc.
Number: 21 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Related to ID#16 & 19, please specify street patching limits along Willox Lane for
any utility work to show how the existing Willox Lane pavement is affected.
Number: 22 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Related to ID#21, might there be a benefit to have the driveway approach onto
Willox Lane be constructed at this time rather than potentially have to cut Willox Lane with
the potential completion of the road project?
Number: 25 Created: 12/16/2008
[12/16/08] Technical Services offers the following comments:
1. Boundary and legal close.
2. Reception number in legal does not match plat.
3. Reception number for 20' ped access easement is missing (sheet 2).
4. Some easement info is missing and would be useful for locating easements.
5. Minor line over text (scanning) issues on the landscape plans.
6. Description of and who maintain outlots?
7. Does the ditch company need to sign the plat?
Number: 26 Created: 12/17/2008
[12/17/08] It appears various stormwater pipes are being installed with this PDP that pertain
to the future bioswale behind Willox. How will these be graded in the interim? Is there a'
need to have this constructed at this time?
Number: 41 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] LCUASS requires a consulting engineer's affirmation statement on the cover
sheet.
Number: 42 Created: 12/19/2008
[12/19/08] The naming of documents will need to be consistent among the various drawings
and should also take into mind the next PDP submittal. Ideally, this PDP submittal should
be titled "North College Marketplace" with the second PDP for the building titled "North
College Marketplace 2nd Filing". Another option would be to title this "North College
Marketplace 1st Filing Wetlands" and the building be titled "North College Marketplace 2nd
Filing" ("King Soopers" can be appended to this title or some other identifier if desired.)
Page 2
City of
Fort Collins
Currenntt
Planning
PO Box 580 * Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750 ' 970.224.6134 - fax
DATE: December 1, 2008
TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt
PROJECT
COMMENT
SHEET
# 39-08 NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE
WETLANDS PDP — TYPE I
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting:
December 17, 2008
Note - Please identify your redlines for future
reference
23 No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site
_Drainage Report _Other,
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
Staff comments on the preliminary road plans and traffic study for North College
Marketplace
September 29, 2008
The proposed 3/4 access point on College - okay with the striped median to the north of
this access point as an interim design.
The proposed right -in right -out access point on College - The applicant has indicated
that this access point is very important to the Developer to serve the site, but the TIS
does not corroborate this in the number of right turn movements that are shown to be
entering this access point. If this access point is this important a right turn lane into this
access point should be provided and the TIS adjusted to support this. This right turn
lane, to standards, will fit with minimal to no additional row being needed on Perez
property.
The intersection of Willox and College Ave -
There is some work that still needs to be done to show that the left turn movements at
the intersection can function. There needs to be a minimum of 4 feet of distance
between the opposing left turn movements, this distance maybe there, but this needs
to be verified and labeled. A few of the left turn movements are shown crossing into
the opposing left turn bay, we cannot have that, the vehicles need to stay out of the
opposing lanes. The median or medians may need to be adjusted to accommodate
that. With that you need to keep and mind and show that nose creating pedestrian
refuge needs to be a minimum of 100 sq ft to meet the City and CDOT standards. It
seems that the pork chop for the right turn lane is creating problems for the left turn and
right turn movements, another possible solution for this corner is to not install a pork
chop island, but move the corner out to resemble the other 3 corners. This could help
with the turning movements and reduce the pedestrian crossing distance. A variance
reguest may be needed for submittal and evaluation should the crossing distance still
be greater than our specified 56 feet.
The signal pole at the NE corner will need to be relocated. Please show where this pole
will sit and the right of -way that will be needed to accommodate this. A pocket of
right-of-way is acceptable to accommodate this. The pole needs to be placed behind
the sidewalk, but close enough so the buttons are accessible.
The right -in right -out access points on Willox into this site and the Albertson site - The
median from the roundabout needs to be extended west across this access point to
control the right -in right -out movements. It can end as the striping for the left turn lane is
shown.
We are okay with the attached sidewalk widths as shown at this intersection. Our group
actually felt it would be better to not have trees and tree wells in these attached
sidewalk areas.
The roundabout -
The pedestrian crossing on the south need to be set back behind the stopped vehicles
as the others are. Since the median and curbing on this site need to be adjusted to
accommodate the roundabout the pedestrian crossings should be able to be
accommodated as well.
In order for the roundabout to function correctly the vehicles exiting the roundabout
and entering the site must have the right of way and not be required to stop at the T
intersection on the site. The two lanes on site that will enter the roundabout will need to
have stop signs at these locations.
The sidewalk at the roundabout where it is the combined sidewalk and bike lane needs
to be a minimum of 8 foot in width at these locations.
The eastern access point - please provide truck turning templates for this access point,
so we can verify that it will work for the truck turning movements.
General comments -
Any driveways other than the two driveways on College Ave that are proposed and
the 3 access points off of Willox will need to be closed with these improvements. Those
are the only access points that will be allowed. To accomplish the changes in access
from the access control plan, the intent will be to vacate Grape Street and all access
to these properties along this current row will need to be accommodated thru the site
and the new access points being proposed.
As to whether there is to be a sidewalk installed on the west side of College Ave that is
something that the URA will need to decide if a sidewalk in either the interim or ultimate
condition is desired with this project as it would not be a requirement of the
development project.
A pedestrian connection is needed across the ditch to the neighborhood to the NE to
meet the pedestrian level of service requirements. We have coordinated with Natural
Resources and there is potential for a pedestrian connection between or around the
two wetland areas. This connection (bridge across the ditch) would provide a great
connection to the grocery store and was identified as a need at the neighborhood
meeting. To NOT provide this connection a modification to this standard in the Land
Use Code would be required. Approval of this would be through the Planning and
Zoning Board.
6a REVISION
Citvof Port Collins
mmml��
Planning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET
PO Box 580
Forl Collins, CO 805??-0580
Ftu: 970-416 -2020
DATE: January 22, 2008
TO: Technical Services
PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt M V
# 39-08 NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE
- WETLANDS PDP - TYPE I
2nd Round of Review
PLEASE NOTE:
¢, TAT' A A 'rcl P. C p A/ STeuGfi ex; 45ASEwI E11T i wNcA) DoEs iT 6c Pioe6.
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff
review meeting:
3, '5"r_ f 4e.E reec&W_V1AJ6 r>A-rE' 17or5N�- MArcK lw-r.
25&V 1 'Vr.4zS1 t IX &4 1- &vS6. February 04, 2009
Note - Please identifv vour redlines or future reference
2. GlN67 0VeR TicT sCs►AW1Ale, / SSUFS del SATE ALA-niD5CA-RW JWT.C,1'tY P !'S�.
❑ No Problems
® Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
r�
Name (pl'ease print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
XPlat XSite _Drainage Report _Other
)-(Utility Redline Utility KLandscape
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
Yours Truly,
Aebpr
Steve Olt
City Planner
cc: Marc Virata
Dana Leavitt
Loveland Commercial
AYRES Associates
Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.
Current Planning file #39-08
Page 5
FINAL PLAN
City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET
Planning and Zoning
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, Co 80522-0580
Fea. 970- 410- 2020
DATE: March 12, 2009
TO: Technical Services
PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt M ✓
#39-08/A NORTH COLLEGE WETLANDS PDP
TYPE I - FINAL PLANS
MARCH 25, 2009
J, 3,v4Z>A-fcy c. C to 5E .
, LJ H #q-r 15 A 1P21 ✓f}Tr 4SC-m E� 7 / T 5 AJ oT JH*WA) IA; TNT G rlo��✓!� j 4AID 7W,6'
TABG,c oA✓ SH&Er / oF�e A Ai- SNoulS TAcT,q 05 R moo. Ct. o
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
3, 5cawA/,A/6 /Ssuc-4 oA) f'cA-r, 517-6't1-Avz15 #,€, 4Wj>c 7'1417yA,*)5.
¢, ,Q6-C_A&1o^J *S f�;Q EA6&"'C,vrr3A3Y4eec-eu-rc Docamr.A - &✓/c.L NEED ro 3cc ¢2>x*-D.
No Problems
® Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
2
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat C�Site _Drainage Report _Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: March 25, 2009
Project:
NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE - WETLANDS PDP - TYPE I AND
FINAL PLANS
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
March 25, 2009
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 20 Created: 12/16/2008
[3/24/09] The plat shows several offsite easements (such as at Pobre Panchos and along
Grape Street). They don't seem to be needed specific to this phase of development, and if
so, should be removed from being shown on the plat. If they are required with the project
however, the signed offsite easements need to be in place prior to sign off on the drawings.
[2/3/09] Please ensure that proposed easements are shown withing the development as
well as existing easements offsites, especially when offsite work is being proposed.
[12/16/08] Please ensure all drawings clearly label existing right-of-way, easements, etc.
Number: 21 Created: 12/16/2008
[3/24/09] The plans should add a note referencing the overlay to follow the patching as part
of the College/Willox improvements.
[2/3/09] The response indicates temporary patching with the City street work to include an
overlay and is indicated as such via Note No. 5 on the demo plan. Please have note No. 5
eliminated for now, pending verification on the overlay aspect. Note No. 4 should address
the patching situation for now.
[12/16/08] Related to ID#16 & 19, please specify street patching limits along Willox Lane for
any utility work to show how the existing Willox Lane pavement is affected.
Number: 25 Created: 12/16/2008
[3/25/09] Technical Services offers the following comments for this final plan review:
1. Boundary & legal close.
2. What is a private easement? It's not shown in the legend and the table on sheet 1 of the
plat shows tract A as a temp cons�qasement.
Signal
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other.
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
W
3. Scanning issues on plat, site & landscape and utility plans.
4. Reception Vs for easements by sep document will need to be added.
[2/4/09] Technical Services offers the following comments for round 2:
1. Boundary & legal close.
2. Line over text (scanning) issues on site, landscape & utility plans.
3. Book & page recording date doesn't match between legal & plat.
4. Why is "Tract A" a temporary construction easement and when does it expire?
[12/16/08] Technical Services offers the following comments:
1. Boundary and legal close.
2. Reception number in legal does not match plat.
3. Reception number for 20' ped access easement is missing (sheet 2).
4. Some easement info is missing and would be useful for locating easements.
5. Minor line over text {scanning) issues on the landscape plans.
6. Description of and who maintain outlots?
7. Does the ditch company need to sign the plat?
Number: 142 Created: 3/24/2009
[3/24/09) The erosion control plan seems to show erosion control measures (gutter
protection) that occurs within the College and Willox roadways, is this intended? Blocking
portions of the roadways would be problematic.
Number: 143 Created: 3/25/2009
[3/25/09] The site plan should reflect the same information on public infrastructure to be
built with this filing as shown on the construction drawings (the construction of a driveway off
of Willox and sidewalk fronting Outlot B).
Page 2
w•
Citv of Fort Collins
BHA Design
c/o David Kasprzak
1603 Oakridge Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Date: 2/9/2009
Staff has reviewed your revisions re -submittal for NORTH COLLEGE MARKETPLACE,
WETLANDS PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) - TYPE 1, and we offer the
following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning
Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: General
Number: 45 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] The findings on page twelve of the report are to be evaluated by Steven Long (wetlands
biologist) with recommendations to offset the potential impacts of any drawdown.
[12/19/08] The ground water study does not address the potential impacts as raised previously.
This report shall address any impacts to either wetland.
- The report was reviewed by S. Long and the results of the review communicated to D. Leavitt
in a letter dated February 18, 2009.
Number: 47 Created: 12/19/2008
[2/3/09] Written documentation will be required as referenced in paragraph 3, page 21 of the
report. This can be addressed during the final review of the project.
[12/19/08] The under drain dewatering system will be taking groundwater and converting it to
surface water. Once the water is converted to surface water evapotranspiration occurs and the
issue of augmentations arises. As the under drain water will be draining into the wetlands, which
will be public property, provide information (dewatering plan) that the evapotranspiration will
not create a loss of legally established water rights. This is also part of the requirements for the
groundwater report.
-Documentation to be provided at a later date.
Number: 115 Created: 1 /5/2009
[2/3/09] On demolition plan add additional notes per redlines.
[1/5/09] All wire fencing along the perimeter of the property shall be removed. Show on
Demolition Plan.
-Added note to relocate fence to east property line.
Number: 120 Created: 2/3/2009
[2/3/09] All comments and issues attributed to Dana Leavitt for this project can be addressed
during the Final Plan review. There are no outstanding issues to be addressed prior to the Type 1
public hearing.
-Noted
Page 1