HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARRISONS ADDITION BLOCK 95 318 WEST MYRTLE TOWNHOMES - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2010-06-03Plannina Obiectives 318 W. Myrtle Town homes
The 318 West Myrtle Townhome project consists of the redevelopment of a large, underutilized
site containing an historic single family home and an existing non -historic small single family
home. The existing historic single family home will be refurbished, (not formally included in this
proposal), and a non historic home will be remodeled and four new townhomes will be
constructed on the site.
Foremost, this project meets City Plan Policies and Principles in the following ways.
The redevelopment and improvements made to this underdeveloped site will meet overall city
objectives to encourage well -designed in -fill development in keeping with the existing
neighborhood. The site is within the Transit Oriented Development Overlay Zone, (TOD).
The close proximity of this site to the TOD makes it an ideal project to help further the city's goal
to encourage different modes of transportation reducing vehicle miles of travel (VMT). This
renovation and expansion project has the added attractive feature of being an integral part of a
walk able community to activity centers such as Downtown Fort Collins and Colorado State
University.
This infill development also meets the planning objective of encouraging compact development
and has been designed to provide connectivity through walkways, courtyards, patios and porches
in keeping with the character of the existing neighborhood. The site design contributes to the
public realm, yet creates privacy for the residents. The alley is no longer featured as the major
pedestrian walk -way between a large scale office building to the east and the existing site.
Rather, the concept of connectivity guides residents and visitors through an appropriately
human —scaled walk -way featuring landscaped areas and well proportioned buildings in keeping
with the existing historic vernacular. The proposed remodeled facade on Myrtle Street
emphasizes a traditional wrap -around porch addressing the varied streetscape to create balance
with the existing more historic building.
The rationale behind the assumptions made in the preliminary design of this project includes our
continued focus as owners and developers towards re -development and infill opportunities in
unique and positive neighborhood environments.
City Structure Plan encourages designing and developing in dynamic and creative ways which
respect the character of the neighborhood. This objective is met by the emphasis upon
creative configuration and placement of the individual townhome units to highlight compatible
massing, (limited spans), balance of major elements, overall form of the buildings (offsets), line
(roof slopes), texture and pattern (siding and window proportions). The proposed eaves are
lower than contemporary residential plate heights; again, emphasizing relationships to the height
and scale of the existing architectural vernacular.
The selection of materials and construction techniques focus upon the issues of sustainability
including slab -on- grade stained concrete floors providing mass for passive solar benefits of
southern oriented living spaces. Open beams ceilings feature re -cycled wood to create a loft -like
interior feel. Energy conservation is important in the overall approach to specific construction
techniques and materials utilized in this project.
This property has been owned by the same family for the better part of the last sixty-five years
and has been deserving of added attention and investment. As the new owners, intend to
maintain the property and to help to restore and respect its potential contribution to the
neighborhood.
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
Bruce M. Froseth & Susan Kreul/Froseth Date: 2/24/2009
524 Spring Canyon Court
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for 318 WEST MYRTLE TOWNHOMES, PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) - TYPE 1, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: Electric Utility
Number: 18 Created: 2/24/2009
[2/24/09] Justin Fields of Light & Power (224-6150) indicated that each dwelling unit must
be individually metered.
Department: Current Planning
Topic: Fire
Number: 13
[2/20/09] No comments.
Department: Current Planning
Topic: General
Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Created: 2/20/2009
Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Number: 17 Created: 2/24/2009
[2/24/09] Comcast Cable TV indicated that they need a 5' wide utility easement outside of
the alley right-of-way. The developer will need to provide a 1" conduit from each home to
the Comcast facility.
Number: 19 Created: 2/24/2009
[2/24/09] Dana Leavitt, the City's Environmental Planner, indicated that the applicant
should minimize materials going to the landfill during demolition.
Number: 20 Created: 2/24/2009
[2/24/09] The request for Modifications of Standards for the front yard and side yard
setbacks do apply because the applicant is adding a second story to the existing structure at
318 West Myrtle Street.
Number: 21 Created: 2/24/2009
[2/24/09] The proposed new front yard setback (I F-9") for the existing structure at 318 West
Myrtle Street must be shown on the Site Plan.
Page 1
Number: 22 Created: 2/24/2009
[2/24/09] City staff had indicated at staff review on Wednesday, February 18th that the
project did not have to go through another round of review before scheduling the
administrative public hearing; however, several departments (Engineering,
Water/Wastewater, Stormwater, Historic Preservation, and Zoning) had comments that need
to be addressed before scheduling the hearing. Peter Barnes' Zoning comments are the most
significant and must be addressed to his satisfaction prior to scheduling the hearing.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Engineering
Number: 8 Created: 2/17/2009
[2/17/09] Is the overhead utility line along the east side of the property proposing to remain
or be removed? The drawings don't appear to show the existing overhead, which seems to
imply it is to be removed. If this is the case, please indicate this on the plan set. If it is
proposed to remain, please show it on the plans and provide conduit for future
undergrounding.
Number: 9 Created: 2/17/2009
[2/17/09] The drawings seem to imply that the alley is of a consistent pavement width along
the frontage, though the pavement width is not consistent along the east side of the property.
Will the alley remain untouched or will some work occur (in conjunction with any potential
undergrounding of the overhead)? The drawings should reflect the condition on the width of
the alley upon completion of the project.
Number: 10 Created: 2/17/2009
[2/17/09] The level of detail on the utility drawing set is less than a typical utility plan set. I
will defer to Stormwater and Water/Wastewater as to whether the information provided is
sufficient, with the exception of the following concerns:
- The utility plan set will need to be a separate set from the site plan.
- The utility plan set will need to have City signature blocks added to all sheets.
- Please add a detail for the curb and gutter (Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
detail #701).
- Should other departments require that the utility plan set be prepared by a professional
engineer, more information will need to be added.
- The owner's certification and director of planning signature blocks should be removed
from the utility plan set. They belong on the Site Plan.
- Ideally the utility plan set should be showing the existing water line on Myrtle to show
the approximate extent of the patching on Myrtle that's needed.
Page 2
Please add two vertical control benchmarks in accordance with City benchmark datum
to help in verifying the elevations on the plan set.
Please add a note on the plan set indicating that all existing substandard curb, gutter and
sidewalk as well as curb, gutter and sidewalk damaged during the course of construction
are required to be replaced in accordance with City standards.
Number: 14 Created: 2/20/2009
[2/20/09] The developer requested a contact person for Qwest. Bill Johnson at 970 377-
6401 (bpjohn2@qwest.com) has been the contact we've regularly used.
Number: 15 Created: 2/20/2009
[2/20/09] I just noticed on the landscape plan that the trash enclosure detail shows swinging
doors which would swing out into the right-of-way and would not be permitted. Please use
either a sliding door system or (if possible) reorient the trash enclosure in a manner that
prevents swinging doors from entering the right-of-way.
Number: 16 Created: 2/20/2009
[2/20/09] Upon verification on revised drawings for ID #8 and #15, the project would be
ready fro a hearing from Engineering's perspective. The remaining comments can be
addressed at the time of final plan review.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Electric Utility
Number: 1 Created: 2/2/2009
[2/2/09] It is assumed that the house at 320 W. Myrtle will remain a single family residence.
It is also assumed that the 318 West Myrtle Townhomes will each have an electric service
not to exceed 125 amps, and will NOT use electric space heating. The developer will then
need to provide an off -site easement across the rear of the property at 516 Meldrum. If these
assumptions are not correct, a new electric transformer will be required near the corner of the
alley and Myrtle. Normal electric development and system modification charges will apply,
as well as costs to obtain the off -site easement. Please coordinate power requirements with
Light & Power Engineering at 221-6700.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 12 Created: 2/19/2009
Thank you for responding to the Conceptual Review comments. PFA has no additional
comments or concerns at this time.
Page 3
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 11 Created: 2/19/2009
[2/19/09] A more detailed grading plan needs to be submitted for review to determine if the
site will drain properly and without negatively affecting neighboring properties. The datum
used needs to be clarified on the plans. If the datum is not an official City of Fort Collins
datum, than please provide a note stating such.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 6 Created: 2/17/2009
[2/17/09] Is the sewer service shown extending to 318 the existing service? If yes, will it be
re -used for the 5-plex?
Number: 7 Created: 2/17/2009
[2/17/09] Provide information on fire sprinkler system so that determination can be made
regarding fire line/domestic water service requirements. Add notes regarding the
abandonment on the existing 3/4-inch water service. The service must be abandoned at the
main. If coordinated with the new 1-inch service, this work can be done at the same time that
the new 1-inch service tap is installed.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: Zoning
Number: 2 Created: 2/6/2009
[2/6/09] The drive aisle width in the parking lot needs to be 24' per Section 3.2.2(L).
Number: 3 Created: 2/6/2009
[2/6/09] Need one deciduous tree per every 40' lineal feet of the parking lot perimeter
landscape strip. Also need a 6' tall privacy fence along the north and west lot lines abutting
the parking lot (Sec. 3.2.1(E)(4)).
Number: 4 Created: 2/6/2009
[2/6/09] Please show all the cantilevers on the Site Plan.
Number: 5 Created: 2/6/2009
[2/6/09] Please show the building footprint dimensions on the Site Plan.
A "formal" re -submittal of the PDP documentation is not needed prior to the required
administrative public hearing. However, there are several issues that must be addressed with
the appropriate City department before the hearing can be scheduled. Be sure and return all
red -lined plans when you submit the required Final Plan documentation for staff review after
the public hearing is held.
Page 4
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
Yours Truly,
h)e�
Steve Olt
City Planner
cc: Marc Virata
Current Planning file #5-09
Page 5
Transportation Development Review Fee Date Received/ Paid V
Total Amount Paid aead
iiA
Citvof Fort Collins Project Name: 318 U) . HY�',_7TA" ��1
Project Location: R3 - , . - _i-tom S= - Date: • Z •�9
Type of Submittal
Please indicate the type of application submitted by checking the box
preceding the appropriate request(s).
Fee structure amount due
❑ Overall Developnient Plan (ODP) $500 each
❑ Final Development Plan (FDP)
This fee includes 2 rounds of review $1000 each
❑ Additional round of review $ 500 each
❑ Annexation $20 x acres = + $250 =
❑ Minor Amendment $250 each
❑ Major Amendment $2,500 each
❑ Re -zone $200 each
❑ Modification to Land Use Code $200 each
❑ Wireless Telecommunication Equipment (WTE) $65 each
❑ Road Projects acres (of roadway) X $250 =
❑ Vacation of Easement(s) ** * # of vacations _ X $400 =
❑ Vacation of Right(s)-of--Way *** # of vacations _ X $800 =
❑ Dedication ofEasement(s) and/or Right(s)-of--Way ***
# of dedications X $250 =
*** This fee does not include the cost of filing fees. Filing fees shall be
determined at the time of final document submittal and will be required prior
to filing.
❑ Project Development Plan (PDP) or Basic Development Review Project
requiring Transportation Services Review and/or utility plan review. This fee
includes 3 rounds of review.
Detached Single Family $160 per unit
# of units X $160 =
Multifamily or other residential units $115 per unit
# of units X $115 =
Commercial, Industrial, Retail, and/or Non residential
building square footage $0.25 per square foot
sgftX$0.25=
Size of the development (area being platted or if not being
platted size of parcel accompanying all development
improvements) $250 per acre acres X $ 250 =
Project fee $2,000 each
Total of above amounts
If this fee amount exceeds $30,000 then the fee amount shall be adjusted with
the following formula:
$30,000 +'h (the amount over 30,000 ) _
The maximum fee for any residential ONLY project shall be $500 per
residential unit. This check should be used to verify the fee amount (does not
apply to mixed -use developments). PDP fee shall be the lesser of this amount
or the ve calculated amount.
�j�#of residential units X $500 = 20�
Reduction for affordable housing — a copy of the City letter certifying/
authorizing the affordable housing shall be provided with this application.
Amount of reduction to be applied
Total owed for PDP $
Land Use Information:
Total number of single family detached units:
Total number of multifamily/other residential units:
Total number of certified affordable dwelling units (a copy
of the letter/ authorization is required): (_
Non residential building square footage: �_ sq ft
Gross Acreage: . 33 acres
General Information:
Owners Name(s): .6 Sul ,A
Street address:
City/State/Zip: &- GALL/4) S . CO 1��r7
Telephone: Fax:
Applicants/ Consultants Firm Name: L
Contact:
Street address:
City/State/ Zip:
O
Telephone: Fax:
Certification:
By signing this permit I acknowledge that I am acting
with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the
owners of the property (including all owners having
legal or equitable interest in the real property, as
defined in Section 1-2 of the City Code; and
including common areas legally connected to or
associated with the property which is the subject of
this application) without whose consent and authority
the requested action could not lawfully be
accomplished. Pursuant to said authority, I hereby
permit City officials to enter upon the property for
purposes of inspection.
Name (ple print).. 3� M FIZZ
1/215z"'
•
Signature
Telephone: 62EO -%
cc: Christie White, Engineering
Development Review Engineering
.... - _ ......... ._ ._
Marc Viratata 318 w myrtle townhome Page 1
From: Ward Stanford
To: Dev Rev
Date: 1/30/2009 5:07:16 PM
Subject: 318 w myrtle townhome
The motorized vehicle portion of the TIS has been waived.
Page 1 of 2
Steve Olt - public hearing
From: BRUCE M FROSETH <brucefroseth@msn.com>
To: steve Olt <solt@fcgov.com>
Date: 3/9/2009 1:44 PM
Subject: public hearing
Steve,
I have met with or had conversation with most of the departments citing some concerns about the
project. I have listed the departments and the action below:
Engineering
Number: 8 I have met with Bill Johnson w/ Qwest and we have a plan for undergrounding the
existing overhead lines. They will be shown on the final submittal.
Number: 9- I had Intermill Land Surveying locate all property corners and their city of Fort Collins
bench marks for each corner. Alley widths will be show on the final submittal.
Number: 10-Plans will be separated for the final submittal. All information required will be added
or deleted per Engineering's request.
Number: 15- The trash enclosure will be redesign to take the door swings out of the right -a -way.
Water/Waste Water
Number: 6- The building will use the existing 318 sewer service for the new building.
Number: 7- I was provided with water flows by the fire department after the conceptual review.
I have given this data to Front Range Fire Protection and they have designed a NFPA 13R system
for the project. Their calculations show a 1 1/2" water line will handle the project. Front
Range is now installing a similar system for Spanger construction on 700-800 E. Myrtle. On E.
Myrtle they used one tap for the sprinkler and domestic water. If the design needs to be approved
I can supply this information with the final submittal.
Stormwater
Number: 11- I met with Wes Lamarque and showed him how the proposed drainage would work. I
had to raise the finish floor elevation on the four new units by 6" in order to achieve acceptable
drainage.
Historic Preservation
Sue and I met with Karen McWilliams to discuss the plans. We agreed to add some detail to the
west elevation of unit 5. Karen was supportive of not having a fence on our west property line and
I will take that up with Peter Barnes before our final submittal.
Zonin4
Number: 2- The drive aisle will be 24'. Peter acknowledged that the on line version of the LUC is
not current since this change was made over two years ago. We will comply with the newer
version.
Number: 3- landscaping requirements will be shown on the final submittal. I need to have one
more conversation with Peter on the fence issue but if required I will provide the fence.
Number : 4,5 Site plan dimensions and cantilevers will be shown on the final submittal.
If you know of something or know a department which still has concerns please let me know.
Thanks
brucefroseth
file://C:\Documents and Settings\solt\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 3/9/2009
City Of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Fort Collins STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM: Proposed remodel of the dwelling unit at 318 W. Myrtle plus
addition of three attached dwelling units on the lot at 318
and 320 W. Myrtle St..
* New proposal contains an additional attached unit.
MEETING DATE: July 28, 2008
APPLICANT: Bruce Froseth
Susan Kreul-Froseth
524 Spring Canyon Ct.
Fort Collins, CO 80525
brucefroseth(a)-msn.com
archfro(aD-earthlink. net
LAND USE DATA: The property is located on north side of West Myrtle Street
between South Meldrum Street and South Howes Street, adjacent to the north -
south alley. There are two dwelling units on the property and a garage that is
proposed to be demolished.
COMMENTS: The following departmental agencies have offered comments for
this proposal based on a sketch plan and project narrative which were presented
to the review team:
ZONING
Contact Info: Peter Barnes, 416-2356, pbarnes(a fcgov.com
1. The property is located in the NCB — Neighborhood Conservation
Buffer zone district. Information about this zone district can be found
online at:
hftp://www.colocode.com/ftcollins/landuse/article4.htm#div4d9.
2. Multi -family dwelling units located within a street -fronting principal
building are permitted residential uses in this zone, subject to
Administrative (Type 1) review and public hearing approval. The
proposed three new dwelling units need to be attached to the existing
dwelling unit at 318 W. Myrtle in order to comply with the "street -
fronting principal building" requirement.
*The new dwellings are attached
3. This property is also located in the Transit Oriented Development
(TOD) Overlay zone district. Information about this district can be
found online at:
hftp://www.colocode.com/ftcollins/landuse/article3.htm#div3dl 0.
2
City Of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Fort Collins STAFF COMMENTS
Off-street parking or residential uses is not required in the TOD
Overlay zone district; however, off-street parking is highly
recommended in this area.
*There are eight off street parking spaces which includes a hadicaped
space.
5. Minimum lot area shall be equivalent to the total floor area of the
building(s), but not less than five thousand (5,000) square feet for
each principal building.
*Lot area is 14,250 square feet and finished square footage of new and
existing buildings total 6,310 square feet.
6. Lots are subject to a maximum FAR of thirty-three hundredths (0.33)
on the rear fifty (50) percent of the lot.
* rear of lot allows 2,375 S.F. proposed is 2,156
7. Minimum lot width shall be forty (40) feet for each single-family and
two-family dwelling and fifty (50) feet for each other use. If more than
one (1) principal building is proposed to be constructed side -by -side
on the same lot, then each such principal building must have at least
forty (40) feet of street frontage for single-family and two-family
dwellings, and at least fifty (50) feet of street frontage for each other
use.
*The lot has 95 feet of frontage and 90 feet is required
8. Minimum front yard setback shall be fifteen (15) feet
* The existing principal building is 7'-9" off of property line. The
.remodel of 318 W. Myrtle will add another 4'-0" of set back.
9. Minimum rear yard setback shall be five (5) feet from existing alley
and fifteen (15) feet in all other conditions.
*The proposal meets requirements
10. Minimum side yard width shall be five (5) feet for all interior side
yards. Whenever any portion of a wall or building exceeds eighteen
(18) feet in height, such portion of the wall or building shall be set
back from the interior side lot line an additional one (1) foot, beyond
the minimum required, for each two (2) feet or fraction thereof of wall
or building height that exceeds eighteen (18) feet in height.
*The existing principal building is 1.5 feet off side setback. All new
construction conforms to side setbacks and height restrictions. A
modification to standards is submitted.
11. Maximum building height shall be three (3) stories.
*meets requirements, low eave heights are planned and are less than a
typical two story eave height.
12. A modification to the minimum side yard width standard will need to
be requested if the remodeled dwelling unit at 318 W. Myrtle does not
comply with minimum side yard requirements.
* Modification is submitted within.
13. Parking lot perimeter and interior landscaping will be required per
Section 3.2.2 of the Land Use Code.
* See landscape drawing
3
City of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Fort Collins STAFF COMMENTS
ATER UTILITY
Contact Info: Glen Schlueter, 224-6065, gschlueter(&-fcgov.com
1. The amount of new impervious area will affect the Stormwater "new
development fee" and the submittal requirements for redevelopment.
The existing impervious areas are grandfathered; therefore,
documentation is needed with a site plan showing existing and
proposed impervious areas along with a table listing each area and
showing the final amount of new imperviousness.
*Table is included on drawings and as a separate submittal item
2. In the Old Town drainage basin, a drainage and erosion control report
and construction plans are required if there is an increase in
imperviousness greater than 5000 square feet. These must be
prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in Colorado.
*The new impervious area is less than 5000 S.F.
3. If there is an increase in imperviousness greater than 5000 square
feet, onsite detention is required with a 2 year historic release rate for
water quantity. Parking lot detention for water quantity is allowed as
long as it is not deeper than one foot. Water quality treatment is
encouraged as described in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria
Manual, Volume 3 — Best Management Practices (BMPs). However,
this site does drain to the Udall Natural Area which does treat the
runoff so there is not a requirement for onsite wfater quality treatment.
If there are less than 5000 but more than 350 square feet of new
imperviousness, a site grading plan is all that is required.
*New grading plan is part of site plan
4. There is a storm sewer in Myrtle should there be a need for a deeper
outlet than the street or alley.
5. The design of this site must conform to the drainage basin design of
the Old Town Master Drainage Plan as well the City's Design Criteria
and Construction standards.
6. The city wide development fee is $4,420/acre ($0.1015/sq.ft.) for new
impervious area over 350 sq.ft. No fee is charged for existing
impervious area. This fee is to be paid at the time each building
permit is issued.
WATER & WASTEWATER
Contact Info: Roger Buffington, 221-6854, rbuffingtonCEMcgov.com
1. Existing mains: 4-inch water main in Myrtle; 8-inch sanitary sewer in
alley east of site.
*The sanitary service for 318 W. Mytle will service the additional units.
2. The two existing residences on the property each have a 3/-inch water
service. A 3/-inch service for a 4-plex may be marginal. Provide
service sizing calculations.
*There will be a new 1" service from Myrtle St.
4
City of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Fort Collins STAFF COMMENTS
3. s and water rights will be due at building permit.
More information about these fees can be found online at
hfp://fcgov.com/utilities/rates-fees.php.
POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY
Contact Info: Carle Dann, 416-2869, cdann(a-poudre-fire.org
1. ADDRESS NUMERALS
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property,
and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting
background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).
An address kiosk would be helpful for non -street fronting dwelling
units. 97UFC901.4.4
*Numerals will be six inches
2. WATER SUPPLY
Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the
water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant
spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on
type of occupancy. Minimum requirements include:
• Residential: 1,500 gpm (a flow test should be conducted to
determine if the existing hydrant at Myrtle/Meldrum can
adequately serve the property)
These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with
automatic fire sprinkler systems.
97UFC 901.2.2.2
* Flows in the area are adequate for this type of development
3. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINLKERS
Automatic Fire Sprinklers may be required with the adoption of a new
Fire Code for any residential project with more than 2 dwelling units.
Please contact Care for current code requirements and information
about when the new code may be adopted.
* Automatic fire sprinklers will be installed
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Contact Info: Dana Leavitt, 221-6143, dleavitt(&_fcgov.com
1. Please contact Tim Buchanan, City Forester, at 221-6361 for an
evaluation of the trees on the property. Existing trees that are
deemed significant will need to be protected or if they are removed,
they will need to be replaced with mitigation trees.
*A site visit with Tim Buchanan has occurred and all trees were
considered insignificant and not worth saving. A large elm will remain
at the entrance to the new parking area. An Existing Locust tree
In the front will remain.
5
City of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Fort Collins STAFF COMMENTS
/0000��Trash enclosures should be designed to be compatible with the
building architecture and should be large enough to accommodate
recycling services.
* A trash/recycling center will be provided adjacent to an existing trash
area for the property north of this site
3. Please contact Dana for information about Green Building programs
and services offered by the City.
ELECTRIC UTILITY
Contact Info: Bruce Vogel, 221-6700, utilitiesCc)-fcgov.com
The existing transformer located at the corner of Myrtle and Meldrum
Streets may be adequate to carry the load for this proposal. If not, a
larger transformer will be required and the developer is responsible for
the cost of replacement.
Normal Development Fees and System Modification charges may apply and
more information about these fees can be found online at
http://fcgov.com/utilities/rates-fees.php. Please contact Doug Martine at
224-6152 to discuss development charges and service requirements.
* An existing transformer across the alley @ the North East corner of the
lot will service the sift . A utility easement will be required from the
property directly north of this lot.
ENGINEERING
Contact Info: Randy Maitland, 221-6605, rmaizlanda-fcgov.com
1. Larimer County Road Impact Fees and Street Oversizing Fees for this
project will apply and be due at the time of building permit. Please
contact Matt Baker (970-224-6108) if you have questions about the
Street Oversizing Fees.
2. Transportation Development Review Fees (TDRF) will apply to this
project and are due at the time of submittal. For more information,
visit http://fcgov.com/engineering/dev-review_php.
3. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) may need to be submitted with
this project. Please contact Traffic Operations (Joe Olson or Ward
Stanford) at 221-6630 to discuss TIS requirements and/or to
schedule a scoping meeting.
4. This project will need to prepare and submit utility plans.
5. The City will enter into a development agreement with the developer
for this project.
9
City Of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Fort Collins STAFF COMMENTS
. of any utility or grading work on the site a 10000Development Construction Permit (DCP) may need to be issued. This
permit is issued by Engineering.
7. Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction,
as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged
or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or
restored in like kind at the Developer's expense prior to the
acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance
of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
8. The project shall be designed in accordance with the Larimer County
Urban Area Street Standards (as applicable). The Larimer County
Urban Area Street Standards can be found online at:
http://www.larimer.org/engineering/GMARdStds/UrbanSt.htm.
9. The existing concrete driveway on Myrtle Street will need to be
reconstructed or closed.
*It will be closed to enhance the overall streetscape and add an
additional five parking spaces to the street parking.
10. If the alley needs to be significantly cut and trenched for new utility
service connections, the alley may need to be fully reconstructed with
an approved, engineered design that works with the alley to the north.
*Power has existing sleeves under the alley. No disturbance is planned
in the alley pavement.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Contact Info: Alyson McGee, 221-6597, amcgee@fcgov.com
1. In February 2007 it was determined that the dwelling unit located at
318 W. Myrtle St. is not individually eligible for historic landmark
designation. The house located at 320 W. Myrtle St. was determined
to be individually eligible for local landmark designation. A
determination has not been made for the garage at 318 W. Myrtle St.,
so the applicant will need to submit photos of all 4 sides of the
structure for a determination of eligibility before the structure can be
demolished.
*There are no physical changes planned at this time for 320 W. Myrtle.
Photos of the garage are part of this submittal.
2. Section 3.4.7 of the Land Use Code calls for the development plan
and building design to protect and enhance the historic and
architectural value of any historic property adjacent to the site. Please
work with Historic Preservation staff to design the new structures in a
character that complements the existing historic structures. Financial
assistance may be available for renovations if you choose to
designate the house at 320 W. Myrtle St.
*The new structures complement the existing structure @ 320 W. Myrtle
in the following manner:
7
City of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
F6rt TAFF COMMENTS
Collinsn
-mag�to the existing house @320 Myrtle
er to 1 '/2 story eave heights on new buildings
-massing consistent W/ existing house
-siding materials relates to existing material and textures
-window proportions repeated/patterns matching existing
PLANNING
Contact Info: Shelby Sommer, 416-2138, ssommere-fcgov.com
1. For a step-by-step guide to the Development Review process, please
visit the Development Review Guide online at: http://fcgov.com/drg.
2. You will be required to submit a Project Development Plan (PDP) for
the City to review. This PDP will be evaluated through the
Development Review Process. City of Fort Collins Departments along
with other external agencies will have the opportunity to review and
comment on your Project Development Plan.
3. A decision (approval, approval with conditions or denial) will be made
by the City's Administrative Hearing Officer following an
Administrative Public Hearing (Type One Review). If your Project
Development Plan is approved at the Public Hearing, you will be
required to submit Final Plans for review which will ultimately be
recorded.
4. Please be aware that you will owe both the Transportation
Development Review Fee (TDRF) and the Development Review Fee
with your application submittal. You will follow the Small Project Fee
schedule for your Development Review Fee, found on Page 2 of the
Development Review Fee Schedule online at
hftp://fcqov.com/currentplanning�/Ssubmiftals.php. A final
development review fee of $1000 will be charged when final plans are
submitted after the public hearing. A final Transportation Development
Review Fee of $1000 will also be charged when final plans are
submitted after the public hearing.
5. Your Project Development Plan will be evaluated per the standards set
forth in the Land Use Code (LUC) and the Latimer County Urban
Area Sheet Standards (LCUASS).
6. The entire Fort Collins Land Use Code is available for your review on
the web at hftp://www.colocode.com/ftcollins/landuse/begin.htm.
7. The Latimer County Urban Area Street Standards are online at
hftp://www.larimer.o[g/engineering/GMARdStds/UrbanSt.htm.
I
City of CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
FortTAFF COMMENTS
Collinsolu0ns
his development proposal is subject to all applicable standards of the
Fort Collins Land Use Code, specifically, but not limited to:
• Section 3.2.1 - Landscaping and Tree Protection
• Section 3.2.2 - Access, Circulation and Parking
• Division 3.5 — Building Standards (including project
compatibility)
• Division 3.3 - Engineering Standards
• Division 4.9 — Neighborhood Conservation Buffer District
9. Please pay particular attention to the parking lot layout and landscaping
requirements. All parking stalls, drive aisles and setbacks will need to
conform to the standards in Section 3.2.2 of the Land Use code.
10. A walkway will be required to connect the street sidewalk to all dwelling
unit entrances.
11. Application forms and PDP submittal requirement checklists can be
found online at http://fcqov.com/currentplanning/submiftals.php.
12. Please contact me if you have questions about speck submittal
requirements.
13. Information about Utility Development Fees and Charges can be
found online at hilp://fc-gov.com/utilities/rates-fees.php.
14. Information about Building Permit Fees and the Permitting Process
can be found online at http://fcoov.com/nbs/?departments.
15. A neighborhood meeting is not required for Type 1 (Administrative)
proposals. I suggest that you discuss your proposal with your
immediate neighbors prior to submitting your development plan for
review. If you would like to hold a neighborhood meeting please
contact me to coordinate the meeting logistics.
16. When you are ready to submit your application to the City for review,
please schedule a PDP submittal appointment at the Development
Review Center at 221-6760.
Q