HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS BREWERY - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2010-04-06FINAL PLAN
Cityof Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT
Planning and Zoning
,in0> ►05 SHEET80
i�����1 Collins.c�) suss?-I�S8o
Fax: 970-410-2020
D • 11 •
TO: Technical Services
PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard M v
# 32-08/A FORT COLLINS BREWERY PDP
2nd Round of Review
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff
review meeting:
April 8, 2009
W� w�P.� �1 oT i4ou rc� APEA%, �/i � �G�✓D�G�E �G�tJS. �"
Note - Please identify Your redlines for future reference
2, 9A-M 6 ! EgW A16-e SH LP �['AT�wk.e-A!7' 1 � Tzz $Gvd4 NEi�D -rb O E CH A-XIG �
No Problems
9 Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
3, W E A),1 L N C-C—D To $ EE 6,7, 4 L ojDS IC 44e-,ALA 5 4, W Se 4 tit I AJG , A0 AI 45
W646 k0'z/TC—i'> To 145 TH/S 4041A1,P,
Name
p
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
lat ,Site _Drainage Report _Other
Utility XRedline Utility X_ Landscape
n
Number: 25 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Pre -hearing: The existing billboard sign on the site does not appear on the site
plan. I'm assuming that it will be removed but want to mention it just in case. If it will NOT
be removed, NextMedia will need to sign approval on the plans. That signage will also
affect the amount of signage allowed on the building if it remains.
Revised. NextMedia lease will expire prior to construction and will not be renewed.
Number: 26 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Pre -hearing: At least one of the handicap parking spaces shall be designated as
"van accessible." Such space shall be at least 8 feet wide with an 8 foot access aisle and a
van accessible sign.
Revised
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 62 Created: 10/15/2008
(10/15/081 Street trees must be chosen from the approved street tree list, available from the
City Forester, Tim Buchanan at tuchanan@fcgov.com. We may allow other species in the
interim to minimize loss of plant material when the project is required to construct the
ultimate improvements.
All street trees have been chosen from "the approved street tree list", where
ornamental trees have been substituted for street trees the trees meet the street tree
`characteristics' requirement for being drought tolerant. We ask that you be specific
with your comments regarding which trees you consider do not meet your standards.
Street tree locations will need to be coordinated and revised as final utility locates are
coordinated.
Number: 27 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Please specify the color of the trash enclosure gate.
Revised
Number: 28 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] The Tree Well Grate Detail is incorrectly labeled as the Exterior Rail Detail.
Revised
Number: 29 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Please provide a detail of the decorative metal fence.
Revised
Number: 35 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] The perennial area adjacent to the bike racks will be quite crowded and I question
how well those plants will survive with the number of people accessing and maneuvering
their bikes in this area. Consider eliminating that perennial bed (at least the eastern edge)
and moving the bike racks closer to the building to free up more roam for people to utilize
the sidewalk. As for the bicycle racks a little further south, also consider moving these
closer to the building to free up more space on the sidewalk for pedestrians to pass.
Revised
Topic: Elevations
Number: 19 Created: 10/8/2008
[10/8/08] Pre -hearing: The Special Height Review requirements pertain to this project. A
sufficient shadow study was submitted and it appears that there are no major solar impacts
Page 2
due to the proposed building height. However, a visual analysis and a summary of
conclusions are also required per Section 3.5.1(G) to complete the Special Height Review.
UPDATE: The applicant submitted the visual analysis and summary of conclusions. The
conclusions drawn are acceptable and there appears to be no major visual impacts with this
proposal. The dates and times of the shadow analysis should be changed to the longest
shadow day and times: December 22 at 9am and 3pm, the day when the sun rises and sets
the farthest north March/September 22 at 9am and 3pm, and for reference, the shortest
shadow day, June 22 at 9am and 3pm.
Revised —submitted under separate cover (via email) to Anne Aspen
Number: 30 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Pre -hearing: Please show building heights and scale elevations.
Building Elevations have been dimensioned to show building heights and heights of
major building elements. Building elevations can't be presented to scale due to
software conflicts. Scale cad drawings will be available at final submittal. Preview
Arch itecture+Planning is happy to meet and review any questions or concerns with
regard to vertical dimensions.
Number: 31 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Pre -hearing if possible (otherwise it will be a condition of approval) Per Section
4.28(E)(b) of the LUC - industrial building faces along arterial streets shall not consist of a
blank wall. The southern portion of the east elevation looks good; however, the rest of that
side of the building is extremely blank (especially the grey metal siding wall). Please
articulate the wall into more human -scale proportions by providing changes in plane,
texture, windows, treillage or similar elements.
Revised and resubmitted building elevations A3.0 (other sheets not affected).
Number: 32 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Pre -hearing: More architectural detailing is needed in the stucco and CMU accent
areas of the mixed -use building - both areas appear quite plain.
Submitted for review and approval to Anne Aspen under separate cover (via email).
Topic: Lighting Plan
Number: 33 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] There are a few small places the lighting levels exceed the maximum allowed 10
foot candles. Please adjust the number of or wattage within the fixtures to comply with
maximum requirements.
Revised. Light fixtures where incorrectly calculated at mounting height 9', fixtures
have been re -calculated at correct mounting height per building elevations (15'-0,1).
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt
Topic: General
Number: 79 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] Strongly recommend that you follow up with Gary Schroeder in Utilities on the
building design with the Integrated Design Assistance Program per his conceptual review
comments.
Work with Gary Schroeder will continue as building design develops.
Page 3
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 78 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] Provide appropriate seed mixes for detention basin - wetland mix for lower "wet"
area and water tolerant for the upper area.
A variety of seed mixes are proposed for this project. Preview Architecture+Planning
look forward to meeting with you and working to refine specific areas of the
detention/garden.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: General
Number: 40 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/14/08] The project needs to look into how pedestrians cross the intersection of Lincoln
and Lemay. A defined pedestrian movement southbound as well as eastbound should be
created and the use of truncated dome warning detection should be implemented for the
east leg only.
R. Acknowledged. Please see the new site plan with the sidewalk extensions to Lincoln
and Lemay.
Number: 42 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Variance requests to the driveway spacing standards are required for both
driveways onto Lemay and Lincoln. I'm understanding that Traffic Engineering is likely to
support a variance request in both cases.
R. That is our understanding also. Variance requests will be submitted.
Number: 45 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] The project will need to fund it's local street obligation for frontage improvements
on Lemay and Lincoln in keeping with the ultimate construction of these roadways. This
obligation could likely also involve additional funds for any necessary interim improvements
that would need to be converted with the ultimate construction (such as driveway
approaches, access ramps, etc.)
R. Acknowledged.
Number: 47 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] A letter of intent should be provided by the overhead electric company that has
facilities within the site; does NextMedia also have an easement right such that they
provided a similar letter of intent?
R. Acknowledged we are in the process of obtaining the letter of intent with Tom McCormick
of PRPA. We will also investigate NextMedia rights.
Topic: Construction Plans
Number: 41 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/14/08] The plan set needs to establish distinct interim and ultimate designs (with distinct
grading, horizontal control plans, plan and profile sheets and also signing and striping plans)
in order to demonstrate that the design's establishment of interim conditions will work in the
ultimate build -out of Lemay and Lincoln.
R. Acknowledged. An interim plan has been added to the drawing set to help clarify
interim versus ultimate improvements.
Page 4
Number: 43 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] The driveway(s) onto the public street systems should be built as a high volume
driveway as required for all driveways accessing onto arterial streets.
R. Acknowledged.
Number: 44 Created: 10/15/2008
(10/15/08] There are some grading concerns along Lemay with first a portion of a retaining
wall in right-of-way. In addition, there does not appear to be a steepness concern of not
meeting 4:1 slopes for the grading behind the sidewalk.
R. It is possible that the retaining wall may need to be extended at this location. However,
we hope to coordinate with PRPA concerning the details in this area.
Number: 46 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/081 The street centerline design specified the use of centerline grades of .4% when
our minimum requirement is .5%.
R. These are the grades which have previously been designed and approved for these
streets.
Number: 49 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] There appears to be a fairly narrow median nose created with the protected left
turn pocket (3 feet in width?) which does not meet minimum width requirements. I'd like to
have additional discussion with Traffic Engineering as perhaps the median nose can be
reduced or some other design details can be looked at short of widening the median.
R. The ultimate median design can be fine-tuned at final to address any geometry
concerns.
Number: 50 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Please provide turning template information showing that the left turn pocket will
operate acceptably for the vehicles using this entrance. Will delivery trucks have any
issues?
R. We believe this basic design can and will work for the ultimate condition, and will verify
that at final design. The turning templates will be provided at final.
Number: 52 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Figure 19-6 of LCUASS specifies parking stall setbacks off of driveways from the
flowline of the intersecting streets. With Lincoln and Lemay both being arterials and the trip
generation in the TIS specifying 701 daily trips, the parking stalls should be setback at least
75' in both the interim and ultimate condition of the roadways. This doesn't appear to be the
case with either driveway.
R. As discussed, some modifications have been made to the site plan to address this
issue.
Request for variance will be submitted. The traffic model for this site indicates that
only 20% of total site traffic will be at the Lemay access point since it is a right -in
right -out movement. Two parking stalls have been deleted at the Lincoln Access and
handicap parking has been located as near as possible to the site access to best deal
with the parking stall proximity to site access.
Number: 91 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] Please clearly define patching limits for the street cuts needed for utility tie-ins.
R. Acknowledged. This will be addressed at Final.
Page 5
Number: 92 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] Using a larger scale for the drawings is recommended with the final plan
submittal, as the legibility of the plan set is potentially an issue.
R. Acknowledged. This will be addressed at Final.
Topic: Plat
Number: 36 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/14/08] I'd suggest titling the plat "Fort Collins Brewery" rather than "Replat of Lots 2 &
3..." This would be our preference as all the drawings should have the same title.
Revised
Number: 39 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/14/08] We are not in the position to agree that right-of-way on Ninth/Lemay can be
vacated by separate document at this time and would defer any decision until the
realignment of Ninth/Lemay has occurred or is far enough in the process such that it's
viewed as certain that this is truly in excess.
Revised
Number: 48 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/081 The use of building envelopes with blanket easements outside of the building
envelopes isn't recommended. Should the building design evolve such that the need exists
to expand the building(s) beyond the building envelopes, enlarging a building envelope can
only be done via replat. It is suggested that easements are instead defined (which can be
dedicated/vacated via separate document without a replat) without building envelopes
defined.
Revised
Topic: Traffic
Number: 90 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] In discussion with Traffic Engineering and as a follow-up to ID#86, I'm
suggesting the following note be indicated on the plans:
"The left turn access shown onto the site off of Lincoln Avenue is shown for illustrative
purposes only and does not create a vested right of left turn access onto the site. The
granting of a left turn access onto the site shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at
the time of the construction of the ultimate Lincoln Avenue improvements."
R. Acknowledged.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 17 Created: 9/30/2008
[9/30/08] A landscape plan showing planned streetlights was sent to Architecture + on 9-30-
08. The planned lights need to be shown on the landscape plan and street tree locations
adjusted to provide for 40 feet of clearance between trees and light standards (15' if the tree
is an ornamental type).
Revised
Page 6
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 12 Created: 9/30/2008
[9/30/08] The storm sewer shown between the sidewalk and the curb along Lemay needs to
be relocated to provide for electric system installation in this area.
R. Utility locates and coordination will continue through Final.
Will coordinate utility locates with street tree Landscaping.
Number: 13 Created: 9/30/2008
[9/30/08] Electric development charges, plus costs to relocate existing electric facilities (if
necessary) will be at the developers expense.
R. Acknowledged.
Number: 14 Created: 9/30/2008
[9/30/08] The developer needs to coordinate locations for electric transformers. It is
suggested this coordination take place before proceeding further with plans. Contact Light
& Power Engineering at (970)221-6700.
R. Acknowledged. Please see new transformer location.
Number: 15 Created: 9/30/2008
[9/30/08] By City Ordinance, the residential dwelling units must have individual electric
meters.
R. Acknowledged.
Number: 16 Created: 9/30/2008
[9/30/08] If a fire sprinkler pump will be installed, please coordinate associated power
requirements with Light & Power Engineering (970)221-6700.
R. Acknowledged.
Department: PFA
Topic: Fire
Number: 63
[10/16/081 SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS
approved, automatic fire -sprinkler systems.
Acknowledged
Issue Contact: Carle Dann
Created: 10/16/2008
The proposed buildings shall be equipped with
Number: 64 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/081 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: Fire department connections shall be
installed remote from the buildings, and located on the street or fire lane side of buildings,
fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle
access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. If possible, a fire hydrant shall be
located within 100 feet of the FDC. PFA Bureau Policy
Acknowledged
Number: 65 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered
shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire
line.
R. Acknowledged.
Page 7
Number: 66 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] KNOX BOX REQUIRED: Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be
mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or
fire alarm system. 97UFC 902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20
Acknowledged
Number: 67 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] REQUIRED ACCESS: Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every
facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
PFA's jurisdiction when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is
located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route
(from a public street) around the exterior of the building or facility. This fire lane shall be
visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. In addition to the
design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must
meet the following general requirements:
❑ Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of
supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary
fire lanes or at construction sites.
F1 Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable.
Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. (NOTE: Not as part of
a blanket easement.)
❑ Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane
(30 feet for buildings three or more stories in height). Please note: Per my discussion with
Olexa Tkachenko, it is acceptable to have the EAE adjacent to the 4-story building be 26
feet wide.
❑ A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation.
If a fire lane is not provided, all buildings out of access (exceeding the 150-foot requirement)
shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire -sprinkler system. 97UFC 901.2.2.1;
901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1
Acknowledged
Number: 68 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] WATER SUPPLY: Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by
the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water
flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and
spacing requirements include:
• Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 300 feet to
the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter
• Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter
• Residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter.
These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler
systems. Please note: Thank you for adding the fire hydrant at the southwest corner of the
property. This hydrant, along with two existing hydrants located within 300 feet of the
structures, should meet our requirements for hydrant locations and water flow. 97UFC
901.2.2.2
R. Acknowledged.
Page 8
Number: 69 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/081 STANDPIPES AND FIRE PUMP
Buildings four or more stories in height are required to be equipped with firefighting
standpipes in every stairwell. The standpipe system must be capable of supplying a
minimum 100 psi to the top floor; an approved fire pump may be required to obtain this
minimum pressure. IFC 905.3.1
Acknowledged
Number: 70 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] STAIRWELL SIGNAGE
Approved stairwell identification signs shall be posted at each floor level in all enclosed
stairways in buildings four or more stories in height. 97UFC1210.4 and Appendix I-C
Acknowledged
Number: 71 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] OCCUPANT LOAD SIGN
Any room having an occupant load of 50 or more where fixed seats are not installed, and
which is used for assembly purposes, shall have the capacity of the room posted in a
conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the room. Such sign shall
be maintained legible by the owner or the owner's authorized agent and shall indicate the
number of occupants permitted for each room use. 97UFC 2601.16.1
Acknowledged
Number: 72 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] COMMERCIAL COOKING FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM
An approved fire -protection system shall be installed in hood -and -duct locations where
grease -laden vapors are produced from cooking operations. A permit and plan review is
required by the Poudre Fire Authority for the installation of required hood -and -duct fire
extinguishing systems. Two sets of plans, along with an application, are required to be
submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau at 102 Remington St. 97UFC 1006.1; 1006.2.1
Acknowledged
Number: 73 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Toxic, corrosive, or reactive materials, or flammable/combustible liquids (as defined in the
Uniform Fire Code) if used, stored, or handled on site, must have a Hazardous Materials
Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the Planning Department and the Fire
Department. (What do you have? How much? How do you prevent it from being a public
threat?) FCLUC3.4.5
Acknowledged
Number: 74 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] BALCONY FIRE PROTECTION
Balconies on all multi -family dwellings of Type V construction are required to be equipped
with automatic fire sprinklers. IFC 308.3.1
Acknowledged
Page 9
Number: 75 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] TURNING RADII
Minimum turning radii for emergency -response apparatus on any fire apparatus roadway is
25 feet inside, 50 feet outside. UFC 902.2.2.3
R. Acknowledged.
Turning radius is shown per above standards and will be labeled as such for final
submittal.
Number: 76 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] ADDRESS NUMERALS
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a
minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick
are not acceptable). 97UFC901.4.4
Acknowledged
Number: 77 Created: 10/16/2008
[10/16/08] OCCUPANCY TYPE
To clarify the anticipated occupancy of the brewery structure, please specify the percentage
of alcohol in the beer: Is it > 12 percent alcohol (F1 Occupancy), or < or = 12 percent alcohol
(F2 Occupancy)?
Will determine prior to final submittal.
Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford
Topic: Traffic
Number: 83 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] Parking stall spacing from the street flowline needs to meet LCUASS standards.
Request for variance will be submitted
Number: 84 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] The north driveway location on Lemay, as shown, is acceptable.
Acknowledged
Number: 85 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] Please provide a clean Signing and Striping plan of current roadway conditions,
and proposed changes, on Lincoln with further submittals. Please include the proposed
Lincoln access drive on those plans.
R. Acknowledged.
Number: 86 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] Full movement access from Lincoln is acceptable currently. Due to the many
possible scenarios for future growth on or affecting Lincoln, the City is unable to guarantee
support for continuance of the full movement access in the future.
This project does not propose full movement access on Lincoln Avenue in the future.
This project proposes % movement access in the future along Lincoln Avenue. The
proposed movement would allow access (entry) to the site. Anything less than %
movement along Lincoln Avenue renders the site inaccessible. Traffic models have
already shown site volumes reduced to 20% at Lemay's right in right out. A second
right in right out on Lincoln Avenue would jeopardize the viability of this project.
Page 10
Number: 87 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] Please review the Lincoln access for proper sight distance criteria per Figure 7-
16 of LCUASS.Primary concern is sight distance to/from the east. Adjust landscaping if
needed.
Acknowledged
Number: 88 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] If the existing bus stop is to remain in use (regardless of the pull out or not) make
sure trees are of a canopy height from initial planting to not impair visibility of the bus stop or
its signage, or other traffic related signage.
Will coordinate Transfort bus stop location with Landscape plan as information from
transfort becomes available.
Number: 89 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] The project does need to provide an east bound left turn ability outside of the
east bound thru lane (per LCUASS). Please show left turn design on the S&S plan on
further submittals.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Matt Wempe
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 37 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/14/08] In discussion with Transfort, a bus pullout will not be required. Final design of
the bus stop should be coordinated with Transfort. Please contact Nicole Hahn at (970)
224-6195 or email nhahn@fcgov.com
Currently coordinating with Transfort
Number: 38 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/14/08] Additional bicycle parking should be provided near the northeast entrance to the
brewery building if it is accessible to employees and/or visitors.
Revised. Added additional bike parking and revised counts.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 61 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Show utilities on the landscape plan and adjust landscape to provide the
required separation distances.
Will continue to coordinate landscaping with utilities as utility locates are
coordinated.
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 51 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Show the property line on the lot to the west. As the sewer is currently shown,
additional easement may be needed.
R. Please see the new utility drawing showing the existing utility easement and Ultimate
ROW.
Number: 53 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Show all dry utilities on the utility plan to determine if there are conflicts with the
proposed sanitary sewer.
Page 11
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: April 8, 2009
Project: Fort Collins Brewery PDP - Type II and Final Plans
All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, Shelby Sommer
in Current Planning, Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review
meeting:
April 08, 2009
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: i':arc Virata
Topic: Construction Plans
Number: 92 Created: 10/17/2008
[4/7/09] Please do further tweaking on the readability of the plans, spot elevations on sheet
6 for example are problematic.
[3/3/09] Carried over as still a concern. The scale of the drawing combined with different
line weights that appear similar make for a plan set that is difficult to follow.
[10/28/08] As previously mentioned, the scale on Sheet 4 would be more ideal for the rest
of the plan set. Please ensure all sheets of the construction plan set have a standard city
approval block.
[10/17/08) Using a larger scale for the drawings is recommended with the final plan
submittal, as the legibility of the plan set is potentially an issue.
Number: 111 Created: 3/3/2009
[4/7/09] On the revised design with the typical cross section please label dimensions as
minimums for verfication of ":worst case" scenario of drop off concerns.
[3/3/09] Since the previous submittal, it appears that a tiered wall design along Lincoln has
since been changed to a single wall with a steep drop off in close proximity to the sidewalk
along Lincoln. The present design seems less safe for pedestrians along Lincoln and may
require the use of safety railings among other things. Why was this redesigned? Cross
sections for Lincoln should go beyond right-of-way to illustrate the wall (and ditch) situation.
Topic: General
Number: 148 Created: 4/7/2009
[417/09] Note #2 on sheet 6 as well as typical section A -A reference the use of a 2' patch.
Please remove the referencing of using 2' patches as these aren't allowed in travel lanes
(full or half width) as well as bike lanes (full width). 2' patching may only be allowed in
Dail
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page I
R. Dry utility coordination is on going and this will be shown clearly at Final.
Number: 54 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Match crowns at the point where the proposed sewer connects to the existing.
R. Acknowledged. Crowns are matched.
Number: 55 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] The mixed -use building must have separate water/sewer services for the
commercial and residential portions of the building.
R. Acknowledged. Please see the new additions to the Utility plan.
Number: 56 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] It appears there may be an extra fire line shown. Please clarify.
R. There is one to serve the restaurant, one to serve the brewery, and two for the mixed
use building to serve the residential and commercial speculations.
Number: 57 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] More discussion is needed on the water service sizes. Some appear to be too
small for the proposed use.
R. Coordination with mechanical engineering needs is on going and will be finalized at
Final. We will keep you informed of any major changes.
Number: 58 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Input is needed from Industrial Pretreatment on the sampling and monitoring
station requirements.
R. We will keep you in the loop as this coordination is on going through Final.
Number: 59 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] Please keep us in the loop as the mechanical plans for the brewery take shape
so we can work together on the metering and monitoring items which affect impact fees and
monthly billings.
R. Acknowledged.
Number: 60 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/15/08] See redlined plans for other comments.
R. Acknowledged.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 80 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] An analysis needs to take place to quantify all of the flow during a 100-year
event that drains in the road side ditches along Lemay and Lincoln. Conveyance needs to
be provided for these flows either by a storm sewer, swale, or combination of both.
R. Acknowledged.
Number: 81 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] Quantity detention is required for half of Lemay and Lincoln along the frontage of
the site.
R. Acknowledged.
Page 12
Number: 82 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/17/08] The additional pond volume required from detaining half of the site's frontage
may be difficult to provide. Our calculations in the office show that the pond may be
oversized when using City pond sizing methods. This may help in coming up with the
volume needed to detain half of the site's street frontage.
R. Acknowledged.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: Zoning
Number: 2 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08]
Building 2 has bike storage for residential tenants, but bike racks are also needed for
commercial uses in building 2. They should be located on the east side of the building. Can
some of the bike parking from building 1 be moved to building 2?
Revised
Number: 3 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] What is the purpose of the raised wood deck?
Patio for summer season.
Number: 4 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] Show distance from the Lincoln Ave. lot line to the covered terrace of Building 1.
Distance from covered terrace to property line is 17'-0" (the dimension has been
added to the site plan since re -submittal (will appear on final).
Number: 5 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] The long term parking stalls will need to have raised signs stating that they are
"employee parking only" or "residential parking only", depending on the building. Add a note
to that effect on the site plan. Per Section 3.2.2(L)(3), the long term parking stalls need to
be 8.5' minimum width, but the plan shows them all to be only 8' wide. 8' is allowed for
compact car stalls in long term parking areas, but no more than 40% of the long term
parking stalls can be compact.
Revised
Number: 6 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/081 Elevation drawings need to show the height of the buildings.
Revised
Number: 7 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] The special height review requirements of Section 3.5.1(G) apply to buildings over
40' tall.
Submitted under separate cover to Anne Aspen
Number: 8 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] The landscape plan shows light post locations, but the site plan doesn't. Add the
locations to the site plan also. Add a note to the site plan General notes stating that all
building and pole mounted lights with be down directional, sharp cut-off, etc.
Revised
Number: 9
Created: 9/29/2008
Page 13
[9/29/08] Provide a trash enclosure detail showing height, materials and color, or provide a
note explaining this on the site plan.
Refer sheet LP1.1 as submitted.
Number: 10 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] Show building footprint dimensions of the 2-car garage buildings and parking
cover connecting them.
Revised
Number: 11 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] Twenty residential parking spaces are required. There's a note on the site plan
stating that there are 20 signed residential parking spaces. Only 17 spaces are obvious
(including the 4 garage spaces), where are the other 3?
Revised
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6206.
Sincerely,
Anne H. Aspen
Senior City Planner
Page 14
F6rt CollinsPlanning
�Cu
PROJECT
COMMENT
PO Box 580 * Fort Collins, CO 80522 SHEET
970.221.6750 * 970.224.6134 - fax
DATE: September 25, 2008
TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT PLANNER: Shelby Sommer
# 32-08 FORT COLLINS BREWERY — TYPE II
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting:
October 15, 2008
Note -_Please identify your redlines for future
reference
R'No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
Name (please print) `
ry
CHECK HEREIF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
_Other
Fort Collins
Planning
PROJECT
COMMENT
SHEET
PO Box 580 " Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750 * 970,224.6134 - fax
DATE: September 25, 2008
TO: Technical Services
PROJECT PLANNER: Shelby Sommer MV
# 32-08 FORT COLLINS BREWERY — TYPE II
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting:
October 15, 2008
Z. f C_ar Loolct C�a�� ��XC.cSpT- r 2 / JAYM;
Note - Please identify your redlines for future
reference
❑ No Problems
EProblems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DM
3, L1i,4t av&n_ 7-Ck7- /"u&s cAJ Sites �AA10JCA10e, %4kli
I _161--r /J 4-c 10 I 's /o e:�.
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE..IFYOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF -REVISIONS..--,--,
L-Plat _LSite _Drainage Report _Other
�-Utility _Redline Utility LLandscape
i
Project Comments Sheet
City of Fort Collins
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: October 31, 2008
Project: Fort Collins Brewery PDP - Type II
All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, Shelby Sommer
in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting:
October 29, 2008
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Construction Plans
Number: 41 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/28/08] The information shown on the plans is sufficient for hearing purposes. For final
all sheets should be indicated as being either interim or ultimate. The plans are in general
still difficult to follow and should provide more labels and look at a scale that enlarges the
site such as sheet 4.
[10/14/08] The plan set needs to establish distinct interim and ultimate designs (with distinct
grading, horizontal control plans, plan and profile sheets and also signing and striping plans)
in order to demonstrate that the design's establishment of interim conditions will work in the
ultimate build -out of Lemay and Lincoln.
Number: 46 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/28/08] With the understanding that the vertical design was taken from a different plan
set, please indicate on the profile view, "vertical design per XX plan set"
[10/15/08] The street centerline design specified the use of centerline grades of .4% when
our minimum requirement is .5%.
Number: 49 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/28/08] This may still be of concern, however additional discussion can be delayed until
final plan review.
[10/15/08] There appears to be a fairly narrow median nose created with the protected left
turn pocket (3 feet in width?) which does not meet minimum width requirements. I'd like to
have additional discussion with Traffic Engineering as perhaps the median nose can be
reduced or some other design details can be looked at short of widening the median.
Signature Date
HECK HEREJF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat /Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
Number: 50 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/28/08] Carried over for reference.
[10/15/08] Please provide turning template information showing that the left turn pocket will
operate acceptably for the vehicles using this entrance. Will delivery trucks have any
issues?
Number: 52 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/28/08] Carried over for reference and appears to be outstanding. I will defer to Traffic
Operations on whether the granting of a variance can be taken into consideration. Overall,
the City is not comfortable with the concept of relocating handicap stalls to this area as a
means to address the concern.
[10/15/08] Figure 19-6 of LCUASS specifies parking stall setbacks off of driveways from the
flowline of the intersecting streets. With Lincoln and Lemay both being arterials and the trip
generation in the TIS specifying 701 daily trips, the parking stalls should be setback at least
75' in both the interim and ultimate condition of the roadways. This doesn't appear to be the
case with either driveway.
Number: 91 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/28/08] The patching shown on the utility plan and the patching shown on the interim
striping plan need to be combined together to show the overall patching (which would ideally
be indicated on a demo plan along with the indication of the asphalt walk removal). This can
all be addressed at the time of final plan review however.
[10/17/08] Please clearly define patching limits for the street cuts needed for utility tie-ins.
Number: 92 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/28/08] As previously mentioned, the scale on Sheet 4 would be more ideal for the rest
of the plan set. Please ensure all sheets of the construction plan set have a standard city
approval block.
[10/17/08] Using a larger scale for the drawings is recommended with the final plan
submittal, as the legibility of the plan set is potentially an issue.
Topic: General
Number: 42 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/28/08] Comment does not appear to have been addressed.
[10/15/08] Variance requests to the driveway spacing standards are required for both
driveways onto Lemay and Lincoln. I'm understanding that Traffic Engineering is likely to
support a variance request in both cases.
Number: 45 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/28/08] Carried over for reference, to be looked at further at final plan submittal.
[10/15/08] The project will need to fund it's local street obligation for frontage improvements
on Lemay and Lincoln in keeping with the ultimate construction of these roadways. This
obligation could likely also involve additional funds for any necessary interim improvements
that would need to be converted with the ultimate construction (such as driveway
approaches, access ramps, etc.)
Number: 47 Created: 10/15/2008
[10/28/08] Carried over for reference. Still appears to be outstanding.
[10/15/08] A letter of intent should be provided by the overhead electric company that has
facilities within the site; does NextMedia also have an easement right such that they
provided a similar letter of intent?
Page 2
Topic: Plat
Number: 36 Created: 10/14/2008
[10/28/08) The plat was revised to be titled "North Lemay Subdivision Second Filing, Third
Replat". This is certainly fine from the,standpoint of the plat on its own; however from the
City's end we need to have the titles of all documents match. Perhaps the title on all
documents should be "North Lemay Subdivision Second Filing Third Replat, Fort Collins
Brewery".
[10/14/08] I'd suggest titling the plat "Fort Collins Brewery" rather than "Replat of Lots 2 &
3..." This would be our preference as all the drawings should have the same title.
Number: 100 Created: 10/29/2008
[10/29/08] Please remove note #3 it does not seem to be applicable any more with the
building envelopes now removed.
Topic: Traffic
Number: 90 Created: 10/17/2008
[10/28/08] Carried over for reference.
[10/17/08] In discussion with Traffic Engineering and as a follow-up to ID#86, I'm
suggesting the following note be indicated on the plans:
"The left turn access shown onto the site off of Lincoln Avenue is shown for illustrative
purposes only and does not create a vested right of left turn access onto the site. The
granting of a left turn access onto the site shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at
the time of the construction of the ultimate Lincoln Avenue improvements."
Page 3
i J
23 June, 2008
Tom Peters
1900 E. Lincoln Avenue #B
Fort Collins, CO 80524
And via email to: tompeters@fortcollinsbrewery.com and of@previewap.com
1^�•7u1
For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff's comments for the proposed Fort Collins
Brewery facility at the NW corner of Lincoln and Lemay, which was presented before the
Conceptual Review Team on June 16th, 2008.
The comments are informally offered by staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components
of a project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the
time of formal review of this project.
The City's Current Planning Department coordinates the development review process.
I am the Project Planner for your project. I will be commenting as well as coordinating the
process. If you have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review
process, please feel free to call me at 970-221-6206.
Sincerely,
Anne H. Aspen
City Planner
cc: Project File
Project Planner
cc: (via email):
Peter Barnes
Marc Virata
Andrew Carney
Kristin Kirkpatrick
Carie Dann
Rob Irish
Glen Schlueter
Roger Buffington
Dana Leavitt
Gary Schroeder
ITEM: 30,OOOsf building upgrade plus new 7500sf mixed -use buiding at the NW
corner of Lincoln and Lemay
MEETING DATE: June 16, 2008
APPLICANT: Tom Peters
1900 E. Lincoln Avenue #B
Fort Collins, CO 80524
LAND USE DATA: Request to construct a 30,OOOsf building for use as a brewery and
restaurant and a new 7500sf mixed -use building. The property is located on the northwest
corner of Lincoln and Lemay. The property is in the City of Fort Collins and is zoned (—
Industrial.
COMMENTS: The following departmental agencies have offered comments for this proposal
based on the sketch plan which was presented to the review team:
Zoning
Contact Info: Peter Barnes, 416-2356, pbarnes@fcgov.com
1. Light industrial and mixed -use dwellings are permitted in the I —Industrial zone district
subject to a Type 1 (Administrative) Review. Depending on whether there is retail or not,
the remaining uses would either be a convenience shopping center (which requires 4
businesses not including the brewery) or just a restaurant, either of which will require the
whole project to go through a Type II (Planning and Zoning Board) review.
NA
2. Parking for the residential component will require a minimum based on the number of
bedrooms. Eight two -bedroom units would require a minimum of 14 parking spaces,
which need to be reserved for the residents only. The remaining uses are subject to
maximum parking requirements. For detailed information on parking requirements, see
Section 3.2.2(K) of the Land Use Code.
Parking Requirements
a. Residential Parking -minimum parking requirement
2 parking spaces per 3 bedroom unit
1.75 parking spaces per 2 bedroom unit
1.5 parking spaces per 1 bedroom unit
Unit Mix Required parking spaces Provided parking
spaces
(1) 3 bedroom unit 2 2
(5) 2 bedroom units 8.75 9
(6) 1 bedroom units 9 9
2
parking lane situations. Please add the note: "Limits of street repair are approximate. Final
limits are to be deter mined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs are to
be in accordance with City standards."
Number: 149 Created: 4/7/2009
[4/7/09] For verification, will the project build sidewalk along Lemay for a majority of the
frontage while leaving out a portion along the northern edge of the site (and tie into
existing)? It would appear that a portion of ultimate sidewalk will need to be escrowed with
the project.
Number: 150 Created: 4/7/2009
[4/7/09] With a portion of the median on the east leg of Lincoln and Lemay being removed
in the ultimate condition, this will need to be obligated for with the development.
Number: 151 Created: 4/7/2009
[4/7/09] Please provide a signature block for PRPA on the construction plan set (or written
indication otherwise from PRPA that they do not wish to sign the plans).
Number: 152 Created: 4/8/2009
[4/8/09] The cross sections on the construction plan sheets should demonstrate that the
sidewalk proposed with the development ties into both the future ultimate widening (which is
indicated) as well the site development today (which isn't apparent). The cross sections
should also show the proposed widening along Lincoln.
Page 2
20 20
b. Commercial/Retail/General Office/Industrial Parking -maximum
parking requirement
General Office 3 parking spaces per 1000 s.f.
General Retail 4 parking spaces per 1000 s.f.
Restaurant 10 parking spaces per 1000 s.f.
Industrial employee parking .75 parking spaces per employee
Land Use Area Maximum narking spaces Provided parking spaces
12,454 s.f. General Office 37 25
9,274 s.f. General Retail 37 25
3572 s.f. Restaurant 35 25
6 Industrial employees 6 4
Total 715 79
3. The buildings will need to be set back 15-25 feet from the property line. If no utilities
need to use the utility easement behind the walk, the set back may be reduced to 10
feet.
Refer to Engineering Comments `There is also an additional dedication
of 15' Utility Easement from the back of the Right of Way'. The
applicant is proposing building#1 with a 20'setback from R.O.W at
Lincoln Ave, and proposing building#2 with a 15'setback from R.O.W at
Lincoln Ave.
Current Planning
Contact Info: Anne Aspen, 221-6750, aaspen@fcgov.com
1. This development proposal is subject to all applicable standards of the Fort Collins Land
Use Code (LUC), specifically Article 3 - General Development Standards and Division
4.23 - Industrial District Standards.
NA
2. The entire Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC) is available for your review on the web at
http://www.colocode.com/ftcollins/landuse/begin.htm
NA
3. We've just launched our new Development Review Guide which you can find at
fcgov.com/drg. This online guide features a color -coded flowchart with comprehensive,
easy to read information on each step. Links to just about every resource you need
during development review is also at your fingertips. Take a look!
NA
4. When developing your plans, pay particular attention to the following sections of the
Code:
• 3.2.1. Landscaping and Tree Protection including parking lot landscaping,
perimeter and foundation landscaping, street tree requirements and screening
requirements for parking, loading, and equipment.
o Refer landscape plan as submitted with PDP submittal
• 3.2.2 Access, Circulation and Parking including parking minimums, maximums,
handicap accessible parking requirements, bike parking requirements
o Refer architectural site plan as submitted with PDP submittal
9
• 3.2.4 Site Lighting
o Refer site photometric study as submitted with PDP submittal
• 3.25 Trash and Recycling Enclosures
o Refer landscape plan and details for trash enclosure area and
recycling area.
• 3.5.1 General Building Standards including compatibility, materials, and height
standards and standards for outdoor storage and mechanical equipment. These
standards are required for projects containing convenience shopping and/or
restaurants in the Industrial zone district.
o Refer building elevations as submitted with PDP submittal
• 3.5.3 Mixed -Use, Institutional and Commercial Buildings including connecting
walkway standards and fagade treatment standards. These standards are
required for projects containing convenience shopping and/or restaurants in the
Industrial zone district.
• 3.8.7 Signs o Refer building elevations as submitted with PDP submittal
o All building signage per code under separate permit
• 4.23 Industrial Zone District Standards including applicability of building
standards and screening, setback and height standards.
o Refer building elevations and solar study as submitted with
PDP submittal
5. If you are interested in building green and using sustainable methods, you might be
interested in contacting Gary Schroeder in the Utilities Department to inquire about
possible participation in the Integrated Design Assistance Program. Gary can be
reached at 221-6395 or at gschroedercc7)fcgov.com.
NA
6. 1 will have more detailed comments once I have more detailed plans to review.
NA
7. An exhaustive list of submittal requirements for this type of project is available at
http://fcgov.com/currentplanning/pdf/project-dev-plan.pdf. There is a submittal checklist
at http://fcgov.com/currentplanning/pdf/pdp.pdf. Please let me know if you have any
questions about the code requirements or the requirements for your submittal.
NA
8. You will need to set up an appointment to submit your application with the Development
Review Center Counter at 221-6750. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
NA
Engineering
Contact Info: Marc Virata, 221-6605, mvirata@fcgov.com
and Andrew Carney, 221-7128, acarney@fcgov.com
1. Larimer County Road Impact Fees and City Street Oversizing fees will apply to this
development. Contact Matt Baker at 224-6108 or mbaker @fcgov.com for more
information.
Acknowledged.
2. The City's Transportation Development Review Fees (TDRF) will apply to this project.
You can get more information about these fees at http://fcqov.com/engineering/dev-
review.php
Acknowledged.
3. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required for this project. Please contact both
Joseph Olson, Traffic Engineer (new) at 224-6062 or Ward Stanford, Traffic Systems
4
Engineer at 221-6820 and Kristin Kirkpatrick in Transportation Planning at 416-2040 for
further information.
Refer to Transportation Impact Study as submitted with PDP submittal.
4. Applicant will be required to dedicate right-of-way (ROW) and easements per the street
classification of the adjacent street. Lincoln is classified as a 4-lane arterial with a total
ROW width of 115 feet. The applicant is responsible for 57.5 feet from the centerline of
Lincoln. There is also an additional dedication of 15' Utility Easement from the back of
ROW required for a utility easement.
Refer to architectural site plan and Preliminary Utility Plans as submitted
with PDP submittal.
5. You will need to design and improve Lincoln and Lemay. There may be interim and
ultimate scenarios which have street oversizing reimbursement implications.
Refer to Preliminary Utility Plans as submitted with PDP submittal.
Ultimate designs are provided for Lincoln and Lemay in accordance with
previously designed and approved improvements proposed along with
Buffalo Run (Sear -Brown), Walmart (CLC) and the bank (Northstar).
Centerline stationing matches that shown on Northstar's plans. No
revisions are proposed to those previous designs.
6. Utility plans, a Development Agreement (DA), a Development Construction Permit
(DCP) and plat are required for this project.
Refer to Preliminary Utility Plans as submitted with PDP submittal
7. Contact me to arrange a meeting to scope out the design of the improvements. You'll
probably also want to coordinate with North Star Engineering who has done the design
work for the project across the street at the northeast corner of Lincoln and Lemay.
Thank you for recently meeting with us. Please see response to comment
number 5 above.
8. The access points on Lincoln and Lemay are likely not to current standards. They will
require variances and may be changed to right -in -right -out accesses.
Refer to Preliminary Utility Plans submitted with PDP submittal and request
for variance submitted by Apex Engineering.
Transportation Planning
Contact Info: Kristin Kirkpatrick, 416-2040, kkirkpatrick@fcgov.com
1. Please provide plenty of bike parking spaces. The brewery area is popular for bikers
and near a major bike trail.
Refer to Architectural Site Plan as submitted with PDP submittal
2. After a discussion of this site at our weekly transportation coordination meeting, we
determined that a concrete sidewalk along Lincoln will be required and based on the
future right-of-way width established by the Master Street Plan. The sidewalk would
need to be constructed based on the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
(LCUASS). Some interim modifications may be needed as it connects with the existing
temporary asphalt sidewalk along Lemay, which will suffice.
Refer to Preliminary Utility Plans as submitted with PDP submittal
3. The existing transit stop onsite will need to be upgraded with this project. Please contact
me to coordinate.
Refer to Preliminary Utility Plans as submitted with PDP submittal
Poudre Fire Authority
Contact Info: Carie Dann, 416-2869, cdann@ poudre-fire.org
1. Ensure that your addressing is visible from Lincoln using at least 6-inch high numerals
on a contrasting background.
5
Refer architectural building elevations as submitted with PDP submittal.
2. The project needs to be within 300 feet of a hydrant capable of delivering 1500psi water
at 20psi residual pressure.
Refer Civil drawings as submitted with PDP submittal
3. Since the buildings are over 5000sf total, automatic sprinklers and a Knox box will be
required.
Buildings #1 and #2 of this project propose automatic sprinkler systems
and Knox box (Knox box location to be determined with PFA)
4. An emergency access easement with a minimum fire lane width of 20 feet must be
dedicated with this project. You may dedicate by separate document or show it on a
replat. Curvatures must have a minimum of a 25-foot inside radius and 50-foot outside
radius. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained
unobstructed. Contact Carie for more detail.
Refer architectural site plan as submitted with PDP submittal
Light and Power
Contact Info: Rob Irish, 224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com
1. Normal development fees (electric capacity and building site fees) apply to this project.
Contact Light and Power for an estimate of charges and to coordinate transformer
location.
Refer architectural site plan as submitted with PDP submittal
2. Existing electric is located in an oval vault just west of the property or maybe on the
property line. Three-phase power is available.
NA
3. You will need to complete a C-1 form and a one line diagram.
NA
4. Any changes or modifications to the service will be at applicant's expense.
NA
Stormwater Utility
Contact Info: Glen Schlueter, 221-6700, gschlueter@fcgov.com
1. This site is located in the 500-year floodplain of the Cache la Poudre River. No new
critical facilities may be constructed in the 500-year floodplain, and any existing critical
facilities shall not be expanded.
Acknowledged.
2. This property is protected from the 100-year storm by the Oxbow Levee on the Cache la
Poudre River.
Acknowledged.
3. Marsha Hilmes-Robinson is the Floodplain Administrator for the Poudre River basin.
Any floodplain administration questions, comments, or concerns should be referred to
Marsha at 224-6036.
Acknowledged.
4. The primary drainage issue with this site is that the outfall is a channel along Lincoln
Ave. The channel has downstream constraints that cause frequent flooding of property
in Larimer County. Therefore, the County Engineering Department will need to approve
the drainage plan. In the past, other sites have had to detain two times the 100 year
runoff and release it manually into the channel after the flow in the channel has lowered
to where the properties downstream will not flood. On one project the County allowed a
very small release rate. The contacts at Larimer County are Rex Burns (498-5721) or
Tracy Downs (498-5701).
A
We have discussed this with Tracy Downs. She is OK with using the
Dry Creek basin release rate of 0.2 cfs✓acre for the proposed detention.
5. This site may have a different release rate because of the flooding issue but normally in
the Dry Creek basin the two year historic release rate is 0.2 cfs/acre. Water quality
treatment is required as described in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume
3 — Best Management Practices (BMPs). Extended detention is the usual method
selected for water quality treatment; however, all BMPs are encouraged and may reduce
the water quality capture volume requirement.
Acknowledged.
6. If Lemay Avenue is required to be built to its ultimate configuration, there is a bottleneck
in the storm sewer that crosses Lemay Avenue which needs to be corrected. The
biggest issue with correcting the problem is that a water line would need to be lowered.
Also, if curb and gutter is required along Lincoln and Lemay, the channels may need to
be piped unless the Engineering Department allows the ditches to remain in the ROW.
Another option would be to rebuild the channels in an easement along side the streets.
We are proposing to enclose both borrow ditches with pipe and make a
connection to a proposed type R inlet located on the existing storm
drain pipes. This appears to be in line with the approved plans for this
intersection prepared by CLC.
7. The design of this site must conform to the drainage basin design of the Dry Creek
Master Drainage Plan as well the City's Design Criteria and Construction standards.
Acknowledged.
8. The city wide development fee is $4,420/acre ($0.1015/sq.ft.) for new impervious area
over 350 sq.ft. No fee is charged for existing impervious area. This fee is to be paid at
the time each building permit is issued.
Acknowledged.
Water Wastewater
Contact Info: Roger Buffington, 221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com
1. Existing mains: 16-inch water in Lincoln, 24-inch water in Lemay; 24-inch sanitary sewer
in a N/S alignment on the property line between Vanworks and the mini -storage, 15-inch
sewer in N/S alignment east of the new bank on east side of Lemay.
Acknowledged.
2. The sewer west of the mini -storage is likely the easier of the two to access. Connection
to this sewer would involve extending an 8-inch sewer east from the existing 24-inch
sewer across the front of the proposed site terminating with a manhole.
We are proposing a solution in line with this recommendation.
3. The water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply.
Acknowledged.
4. Development fees and water rights will be due at time of building permit.
Acknowledged.
Natural Resources
Contact Info: Dana Leavitt, 224-6143, dleavitt(cD_fcaov.com
Natural Resources
Contact Info: Dana Leavitt, Environmental Planner, 224-6143, dleavitt@fcgov.com
1. The trash enclosure needs to be designed to accommodate recycling services. The City
of Fort Collins Design Considerations Guidance Document may be found that
http://www.fcgov.com/recycling/pdf/enclosure-guidelines0804.pdf. Please consult this
document to determine the size and appropriate design for your enclosure. If refuse
areas are contained within the facility and recycling practices will be in place within the
7
facility please provide a letter documenting the recycling procedures so that this
subsection can be waived.
Refer Landscape plans and details for trash and recycling enclosures
designed and sized per above mentioned standards.
2. During a previous conceptual review of this property, it was determined that there is a
potential wetland on the site. A site visit including Dana Leavitt will be required to
confirm this and determine if a Wetland Delineation will be required. Guidelines for
conducting this delineation may be found under section 3.4.1 (D) (2) of the Fort Collins
Land Use Code (LUC). These wetlands may be considered jurisdictional wetlands by the
Army Corps of Engineers. A jurisdictional determination letter will be required from the
Corps and possibly Corps permits to provide proof of compliance meeting section 3.4.1
(0) of the LUC.
Per a telephone conversation on September 15, 2008 Dana Leavitt has
indicated that after a number of site observations this project has no
wetland issues or concerns and that the project design should move
forward accordingly.
3. Components of green building could be integrated into your project. The following city
supported programs include: Deconstruction/Construction Debris, Natural Resources,
John Armstrong, 416-2230; Electric Efficiency Program, Utilities, John Phelan, 416-
2539.
NA
Utilities Customer Service
Contact info: Gary Schroeder 221-6395, gschroeder@fcgov.com
1. (For commercial projects over 5000sf): Financial incentives and technical support are
available from Fort Collins Utilities' Integrated Design Assistance Program (IDAP). This
program provides design support with the goal of making facilities more energy efficient
and thereby less costly to operate. Early participation is critical to obtaining optimal
energy savings. See www.fc9lov.com/idap for details or contact Gary.
M.
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: March 9, 2009
Project: Fort Collins Brewery PDP - Type II and Final Plans
All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, Shelby Sommer
in Current Planning, Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review
meeting:
March 04, 2009
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: Construction Plans
Number: 41 Created: 10/14/2008
[3/2/09] The level of information shown for the plans for a final plan review requires more
information in accordance to LCUASS submittal requirements and checklist. Please look to
ensure that the information required is included. Among some (not all) concerns:
- Flowline profiles are required along the frontage of Lincoln and Lemay.
- Cross sections at 50' intervals for Lemay and Lincoln.
- Offsite design (per standards 1,000 feet offsite -- this can use previously approved design
information but it should still be shown; having the offsite design west of the site match a
common point with O'Dell's is satisfactory).
[10/28/08] The information shown on the plans is sufficient for hearing purposes. For final
sheets should all be indicated as being either interim or ultimate. The plans are in general
still difficult to follow and should provide more labels and look at a scale that enlarges the
site such as sheet 4.
[10/14/08] The plan set needs to establish distinct interim and ultimate designs (with distinct
grading, horizontal control plans, plan and profile sheets and also signing and striping plans)
in order to demonstrate that the design's establishment of interim conditions will work in the
ultimate build -out of Lemay and Lincoln.
Number: 46 Created: 10/15/2008
[3/3/09] With the road width for Lincoln now reduced by the elimination of the median and
the use of a center turn lane, the use of referring to previous plan sets for the design of
Lincoln no longer seems appropriate. At this point, the use of .4% flowline grades should be
reconsidered given the change in the design f Lincoln.
Signature
Da e
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat ✓ Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility Redline Utility --Landscape
Page 1
I
[10/28/08] With the understanding that the vertical design was taken from a different plan
set, please indicate on the profile view, "vertical design per XX plan set"
[10/15/08] The street centerline design specified the use of centerline grades of .4% when
our minimum requirement is .5%.
Number: 91 Created: 10/17/2008
[3/3/09] The typical section information on Sheet 6 shows patching that leaves a seam
within the bikelane. The sawcut area should be shown to be expanded to encompass the
entire bikelane width (on both sides of Lincoln). In addition, street patching needs to be
"squared off' and not taper in accordance with our patching standards.
[10/28/08] The patching shown on the utility plan and the patching shown on the interim
striping plan need to be combined together to show the overall patching (which would ideally
be indicated on a demo plan along with the indication of the asphalt walk removal). This can
all be addressed at the time of final plan review however.
[10/17/08] Please clearly define patching limits for the street cuts needed for utility tie-ins.
Number: 92 Created: 10/17/2008
[3/3/09] Carried over as still a concern. The scale of the drawing combined with different
line weights that appear similar make for a plan set that is difficult to follow.
[10/28/08] As previously mentioned, the scale on Sheet 4 would be more ideal for the rest
of the plan set. Please, ensure all sheets of the construction plan set have a standard city
approval block.
[10/17/08] Using a larger scale for the drawings is recommended with the final plan
submittal, as the legibility of the plan set is potentially an issue.
Number: 110 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] The drive approaches out to Lemay and Lincoln have cross slopes for the sidewalk
across the drive approaches that exceed the 1:48 requirement.
Number: 111 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] Since the previous submittal, it appears that a tiered wall design along Lincoln has
since been changed to a single wall with a steep drop off in close proximity to the sidewalk
along Lincoln. The present design seems less safe for pedestrians along Lincoln and may
require the use of safety railings among other things. Why was this redesigned? Cross
sections for Lincoln should go beyond right-of-way to illustrate the wall (and ditch) situation.
Number: 112 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] The elimination of the median along Lincoln no longer creates the need to have the
note added to the plans regarding the vesting of access along Lincoln.
Number: 113 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] The elimination of the median along Lincoln resulted in a narrower road width than
previously shown for Lincoln. A by-product of this change is an offset in lane alignment
along Lincoln Avenue heading westbound across the Lemay intersection. I'm measuring a
T offset which is beyond the maximum allowed in our street standards (2' is the maximum
allowed in a hardship situation).
Number: 114 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] Doesn't the driveway access off Lemay require some sort of sawcut along Lemay in
order to have the driveway built?
Page 2
Number: 115 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] Please provide spot elevation information for the patching along Lincoln in order to
demonstrate that the additional pavement width results in cross slope and drainage
considerations meeting our requirements. Spot elevations should include not just the new
width added but existing. (Cross sections would also provide similar information of benefit
for review).
Number: 116 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] I'm seeing that the Lincoln right-of-way dedication does not coincide with the center
of the street, this does seem to differ slightly from the proposed design from Northern for
O'Dells which is of concern. In addition, I'd like to look at having the middle of the center
turn lane coincide with the section line for several reasons. 1) It more allows for the curb
line on the south side of Lincoln at the Lemay intersection to remain. 2) It reduces the
amount of offset across the intersection of Lemay as noted in ID#114.
Number: 118 Created: 3/3/2009
[3/3/09] The sidewalk shown along Lincoln stops short of the western boundary of the site.
Normally sidewalk should be installed along the entire boundary. If this is acceptable to
Transportation Planning, funds would need to be collected for the extension of the sidewalk
to the property boundary and piping of the ditch to facilitate this. Otherwise, the design
should pipe the ditch further west to ensure the sidewalk is built to the property line.
Number: 125 Created: 3/4/2009
[3/4/09] Please specify the patching on the east side of the driveway out to Lincoln to not
create an angle point with the existing edge of pavement.
Number: 126 Created: 3/4/2009
[3/4/09] With the retaining wall being in the theoretical utility easement for Lincoln (and the
steepness of the retaining wall), we should probably get verification from the utilities that
their needs can be met.
Topic: General
Number: 45 Created: 10/15/2008
[3/3/09] In conjunction with ID#41 more design information needs to be provided in order to'
discern what sort of funding for the local street portion needs to be provided for. Is the
sidewalk along the frontage of the property interim such that it cannot exist in the ultimate
condition? How much of the driveways need to be rebuilt? Ultimate flowline profiles and
cross sections would help in demonstrating this.
[10/28/08] Carried over for reference, to be looked at further at final plan submittal.
[10/15/08] The project will need to fund it's local street obligation for frontage improvements
on Lemay and Lincoln in keeping with the ultimate construction of these roadways. This
obligation could likely also involve additional funds for any necessary interim improvements
that would need to be converted with the ultimate construction (such as driveway
approaches, access ramps, etc.)
Number: 127 Created: 3/4/2009
[3/4/09] Given the 15' U.E. along Lincoln is apparently west of the property, can the pipe be
extended to the west of the property for the sidewalk to be built along the entire frontage?
Page 3
Topic: Plat
Number: 36 Created: 10/14/2008
[3/2/09] Same comment as before; the plat title "North Lemay Subdivision Second Filing,
Third Replat" is fine but if that's intended, then the other documents (site, landscape,
construction drawings, etc) also need to be titled the same. (If the other documents prefer
to be titled "Fort Collins Brewery", it's fine for the plat to have that title as well).
[10/28/08] The plat was revised to be titled "North Lemay Subdivision Second Filing, Third
Replat". This is certainly fine from the standpoint of the plat on its own; however from the
City's end we need to have the titles of all documents match. Perhaps the title on all
documents should be "North Lemay Subdivision Second Filing Third Replat, Fort Collins
Brewery".
[10/14/08] I'd suggest titling the plat "Fort Collins Brewery" rather than "Replat of Lots 2 &
3..." This would be our preference as all the drawings should have the same title.
Page 4
FINAL PLAN
�of Fort Collim - COMMENT SHFF'r
Planning; and Zoning;
PO Box 580
Pon Collins, CO 80522-0580
F a.v: 970-416- 20 20
DATE: February 5, 2009
TO: Technical Services
PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard M d
#32-08/A FORT COLLINS BREWERY PDP
March 04, 2009
Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference
I. B&uwpAAv cw se s.
Z, ✓1'ltn/oR2 LINE (Sc* .#) Aj /.v Z-) 1:5 5 U e7 5 bA) slrc LA�1'v5C Ae PM-105-
❑ No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
3 . j�GC-�45E r✓1 o ✓ Z&l c> L tA) E o F Ti TtE (n1opz7v Lewrx Y _ . _ . , J u 5 r-
GooLc/A45 $2c-W64)'1.
3
Name (ple`ase print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
XC Plat (Site _Drainage Report _Other
Utility XRedline Utility Landscape
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
(:`aE� a�E Icrt C:rl7zc��
OLEXA TKACHENKO Date: 10/20/2008
204 WALNUT STREET, STE A
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524
Staff has reviewed your submittal for Fort Collins Brewery PDP - Type II, and we offer the
following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 9/29/2008
[9/29/08] The following departments have no comments/concerns: Poudre School District,
Park Planning, Neighborhood Services, Water Conservation, GIS, Comcast,
Number: 18 Created: 10/6/2008
[10/6/08] Rick Lee (Building Department): Please see the attached list of codes and
standards that will apply to this proposal. Please schedule a pre -submittal code review
meeting as noted.
Will schedule meeting prior to final submittal.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 20 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Wrong scale is indicated on the site plan. It says 1" = 30' but it should read 1" _
20'.
Revised
Number: 21 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Please show light pole locations on the site plan.
Revised
Number: 22 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Prehearing: It would be helpful if you could label the restaurant portion of the
project on the site plan. This is the only portion of the building that needs to comply with the
building standards contained in Section 3.5.3.
Revised
Number: 23 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Ramps are needed near handicap parking spaces and at sidewalk crossings.
Please show these on the site plan. Where a ramp would pinch down the through walkway,
consider dipping the whole sidewalk down instead.
Revised
Number: 24 Created: 10/9/2008
[10/9/08] Long term parking stalls must be at least 8 1/2 feet wide at a minimum.
Revised. Parking stall dimensions and parking counts have been revised.
Page 1