HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY VILLAGE PUD LOT 9 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-03-16AP, PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: August 15, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #65-93F Harmony Village P.U.D., Lot 9 (Medical
Office Buildings) — Type 1 — Major Amendment
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Tim Blandford
All comments must be received by: September 6, 2000
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Comments:
• Please modify the General Notes. See the attached sheets.
• Please provide curve infonnation for the locations shown on the utility plans.
• Please update the City's signature blocks.
• Because of the new utility connections and the removal of the existing driveway cuts, an
entire overlay will be required for Wilmington Drive, since Wilmington is a brand new
street. Please talk with Rick Richter and refer to the "Street Repairs and Reconstruction
Standards and Guidelines" manual if you have any questions.
• Please add detail D-20 to the utility plan set.
• See utility plans for additional comments and concerns.
C
Date: September 1, 2000 Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
❑ Plat 23 Site 21 Utility 2 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT
/-t9m
City of Foil Collins
Current Plannim,
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: August 15, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT: #65-93F Harmony Village P.U.D., Lot 9
(Medical Office Buildings) Type 1 Major
Amendment
A11 comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
September 6, 2000
Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference
Signature
CHECK HERE IF YOiJ WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site _Drainase Report Other
_Utility Redline Utility Landscape clvoe Fa=tcoltias
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: January 3, 2001 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #65-93F Harmony Village PUD, Lot 9 — Major
PLANNER
Amendment
Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments must be received by:
Wednesday, January 17, 2001
See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, plat, site, and landscape plans. More
specific comments will be mentioned below.
The site and landscape plans should show all easements per the replat.
Please remove "the successors and assigns" statement on the replat. The maintenance and
repair guarantee can not be assigned.
Date: l O$ C' Signature:
PLEASL�SE DCOPIES�LAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS-Q SITE El NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
EQUTILITY
,1 LANDSCAPE
lArwa
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current PlanninE
DATE: November 27, 2000 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #65-93F HARMONY VILLAGE LOT 9, MAJOR
AMENDMENT
Harmony Village Lot 9 Replat — Submitted in conjunction with
the Major Amendment
ti1a,tN;
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
December 13, 2000 1//Z C
No Comment
RProblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
"PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
ILtn 11 , i�S
Signature
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other
Utility Redline Utility _Landscape
DATE: November 22, 2000 DEENGINEERING
PROJECT: #65-93F Harmony Village PUD, Lot 9 — Major
Amendment
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments must be received by. -
Wednesday, December 13, 2000
General Comments
♦ MAJOR ISSUE: I realize that this comment has not been made in the past, but from an engineering
perspective it is a major issue. The building on Lot I is blocking the sight line for the private drive
(see landscape plans). This is not acceptable. A minimum of a 300-foot sight line should be
maintained.
♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, plat, site, and landscape plans. More specific
comments will be mentioned below.
Utility Plan Comments
♦ Because of the new utility connections and the removal of the existing driveway cuts, an entire
overlay will be required for Wilmington Drive, since Wilmington is a brand new street. This is
a repeat comment, so if there are questions. I would like to set up a meeting with the applicant and
Rick Richter, Pavement Management to resolve the issue.
♦ Per Land Use Code Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(f), drainage from a private can not be channeled or directed to
over the public sidewalk. Please correct the western access point.
♦ The offsite trail connection should be shown to the Harmony Village property or at a minimum the
distance should be specified. The applicant will be required to pay into the trail system on building
permit basis. The cost will be determined at the development agreement stage of the process.
Date: /� Signature:
PLEASE END COPIES —9- PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: SITE
6�UTILITY NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
'Ef LANDSCAPE
Site and Landscape Plan
♦ The entrance to Building C shows a fire lane through the pull. Does PFA need an emergency access
easement through this site?
♦ The canopy for Building C needs to be shown with a minimum 13-foot 6-inch clearance per Land Use
Code Section 3.6.6(L).
♦ The offsite trail connection should be shown to the Harmony Village property or at a minimum the
distance should be specified. The applicant will be required to pay into the trail system on building
permit basis. The cost will be determined at the development agreement stage of the process.
Replat Comments
♦ Please correct plat language. See the attached handout.
♦ Please provide a public access easement through all lots. Does PFA need an emergency access
easement?
♦ Please show the existing 9-foot utility easement along Wilmington Drive.
♦ There is an existing 20-foot drainage easement along the south property line. Please show that
easement to be vacated, since you are proposing a larger easement.
♦ Please provide a sight distance easement along Lot I.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: October 11, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: 965-93F Harmony Village PUD, Lot 9 — Major
Amendment
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments must be received by:
Wednesday, November 1, 2000
General Comments
♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, plat, site, and landscape plans. More specific
comments will be mentioned below.
Utilitv Plan Comments
♦ Add the following note Add the following note (as shown as 48 on the redlined utility plans):
All street work necessitating the need to cut into the street shall be done in accordance with the
City's "Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines." The City Inspector and/ or
the City Engineer has final authority over the street repair limits.
♦ Because of the new utility connections and the removal of the existing driveway cuts, an entire
overlay will be required for Wilmington Drive, since Wilmington is a brand new street. This is
a repeat comment, so if there are questions, I would like to set up a meeting with the applicant and
Rick Richter, Pavement Management to resolve the issue.
♦ If the cross walks across Wilmington Drive are enhanced, please provide a detail.
♦ Please show the driveway with concrete to the right-of-way line for both access points.
♦ Prior to public hearing, any easements needed for this development will either have to be provided the
easement(s) or the letter(s) of intent.
Date: IiNSignature:
PLEAS> SEND COPIES PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: ElzSITE
0" UTILITY NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
0-ILANDSCAPE
♦ Per Land Use Code Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(f), drainage from a private can not be channeled or directed to
over the public sidewalk. Please correct the western access point.
♦ The offsite trail connection should be shown to the Harmony Village property or at a minimum the
distance should be specified. The applicant will be required to pay into the trail system on building
permit basis. The cost will be determined at the development agreement stage of the process.
Site and Landscape Plan
♦ If the cross walks across Wilmington Drive are enhanced, please provide a detail.
♦ Please show the driveway with concrete to the right-of-way line for both access points.
♦ Prior to public hearing, any easements needed for this development will either have to be provided the
easement(s) or the letter(s) of intent.
♦ The entrance to Building C shows a fire lane through the pull. Does PFA need an emergency access
easement through this site?
♦ The canopy for Building C needs to be shown with a minimum 13-foot 6-inch clearance per Land Use
Code Section 3.6.6(L).
♦ The offsite trail connection should be shown to the Harmony Village property or at a minimum the
distance should be specified. The applicant will be required to pay into the trail system on building
permit basis. The cost will be determined at the development agreement stage of the process.